One Ala Moana
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
One Ala Moana
Building Overview
One Ala Moana in Downtown-Chinatown, a 2014 concrete building with ocean and mountain views, offering a pool and concierge services.
About One Ala Moana
Based on MLS data, One Ala Moana is located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood and was built in 2014. The building is constructed of concrete. MLS-provided information does not include total building square footage or unit size details.
According to available records, units at One Ala Moana can have ocean, mountain, and sunset views. On-site amenities listed in the MLS include a pool, fitness center, BBQ area, resident manager, concierge, and security guard. The building has central air conditioning.
MLS data indicates parking is available, covered, assigned, with guest parking. Pets are not allowed; short-term rentals are permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or Hawaii property management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit percentages like '80% owner occupied' and qualitative descriptors such as 'majority owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied,' but did not find a building-level figure. A few remarks suggest some owners use the units as second homes or that individual units were owner-occupied, but that is not enough to infer the overall owner-occupancy rate.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator counts like '4 elevators,' 'four elevators,' or 'multiple elevators,' but none were stated. The listings only imply the presence of elevators through phrases about direct access and switching elevators, which is not enough to determine a numeric count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
Only 4/20 MLS records currently list central AC in association fees and multiple public remarks explicitly state 'Electric and A/C are billed separately' or 'electricity, A/C usage... are billed separately.' While a few listings mention 'central A/C' in unit descriptions, the stronger agent statements about separate billing across several listings indicate central A/C is not included in the maintenance fee.
Cable TV inclusion has extremely strong building-level support: 20 of 20 MLS listings include CABTV. The public remarks do not discuss cable directly, but there is no contradictory evidence, so this appears to be a stable building amenity/fee inclusion.
Common-area electricity has moderate MLS support, with 15 of 20 listings marking OTCOEX. Public remarks do not explicitly say “common area electricity included,” and one listing notes “Electric and A/C are billed separately,” so the evidence is mixed and may reflect inconsistent agent entry rather than a building change.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Gas inclusion is strongly supported across the dataset: 18 of 20 MLS records include GAS. Multiple remarks mention gas cooking appliances in the units, which is consistent with the building providing gas as part of maintenance fees rather than a recent change.
Hot water inclusion has solid building-level support, with 16 of 20 listings showing HOTWAT. There is one listing with WTRHTR in inclusions, but that appears to be an outlier rather than evidence of a building-wide change, and the public remarks do not describe a shift away from included hot water.
MLS shows INTSER in 16 of 20 records. No public-remark statements clearly confirm or deny internet service inclusion, so the feature is included with moderate (implied) confidence, likely from MLS checkbox copy/paste.
No analysis available
Moderate-to-strong MLS support: 16 of 20 listings include SEWER. The remarks are silent on sewer billing, and there is no evidence of an owner-reported change that would justify overriding the MLS pattern.
Moderate-to-strong MLS support: 16 of 20 listings include WATER. No public remark contradicts this, so the building should be treated as having water included in maintenance fees.
Very strong evidence from both MLS and remarks. Listings repeatedly mention "BBQ cabanas," "barbecue areas," "gas grills," and "private BBQ pavilions," which clearly indicates shared grilling facilities. The consistency across many descriptions suggests a copied building amenity rather than a one-off unit detail.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No consistent evidence for a clubhouse: only 3 of 20 MLS records show a clubhouse checkbox and the large set of public remarks repeatedly lists other indoor/outdoor amenity spaces (private dining, party room, lounge, chef's kitchen) but not a distinct 'clubhouse', suggesting the clubhouse checkbox is uncommon or possibly inconsistently used by agents.
Concierge service is very well documented and highly consistent across the listings. Many independent remarks explicitly name it, including phrases like "24-hour concierge service," "24/7 concierge," "full service concierge," and "concierge services." The repeated, detailed mentions across multiple agents make this high-confidence building-level evidence.
The building clearly offers a dog park/dog area. Many listings explicitly mention "dog park" or "dog parks," and several also describe the property as pet-friendly. The feature appears frequently enough across remarks to be considered building-level.
Doorman service is less frequently stated than concierge or security, but it is still supported by explicit and implied evidence. The key phrase "24-hour security and doormen" appears in one detailed listing, and other remarks describe 24/7 staffed service at the entry. Overall, this suggests a real doorman-style presence rather than a mere MLS copy-paste artifact.
This is overwhelming building-level evidence. Multiple listings describe a "fitness center," "gym," "exercise center," and even "state-of-the-art gym," while the MLS shows 20/20 listings with the amenity checked. The language is consistent across many agents, so this appears to be a stable shared feature.
No analysis available
There is high-confidence evidence for a shared meeting/conference space. Multiple listings reference a "conference room" or "reserve-able meeting room," and the MLS shows 19/20 listings with the amenity. This looks like a consistent building feature across agents.
Patio/deck amenities are strongly supported by the current remarks and historical MLS pattern. Roughly 20+ listings mention shared outdoor spaces such as the amenity deck, terrace, recreational deck, cabanas, and outdoor lounge areas, indicating this is a real building-level feature rather than a one-off unit detail. The evidence is repeated across many listings and agents, not just copy-paste checkbox data.
The amenity is repeatedly described as "jogging paths" or "walking paths." With 16/20 MLS listings checked and several remarks naming the feature directly, this is strong evidence of a shared building path for walking/jogging.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports a shared putting green. Several listings directly call out a "putting green" or "golf putting green," and the MLS backs this up with 15/20 listings. This is consistent across multiple public remarks.
Multiple listings describe the shared amenity level as a "recreational deck," "amenity deck," or landscaped terrace with outdoor lounge areas. The MLS is also very strong at 18/20. Together, this supports a true shared recreation area rather than a private unit feature.
The building is repeatedly described as having a "game room," "recreation room," and party/recreation spaces. With 18/20 MLS listings including RECROO, this is strong building-level evidence. The references come from many different listings, so this does not look like an isolated agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
High confidence: 16 of 20 listings include sauna and many remarks describe locker rooms with saunas or 'sauna' as an amenity in the fitness/locker area, supporting the presence of saunas in the building.
Storage units/lockers are mentioned across many current listings, often with specific locker numbers or sizes, which strongly supports that the building offers this feature. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and appears repeatedly in unit remarks rather than being a one-off MLS checkbox artifact.
The remarks directly confirm secured surfboard storage facilities. This is strong, explicit evidence that the building has surfboard storage.
No analysis available
The trash chute feature is strongly supported by the MLS data, with 19/20 listings including TRACHU. It is normal for public remarks not to mention trash chutes, so the lack of remark coverage does not weaken the evidence. This should be treated as a building-level feature.
Valet service is not supported by the remarks in this dataset. Across the current listings, there are many references to concierge service, 24-hour staff, and easy/direct parking access, but no explicit mention of valet parking or valet service. Given the lack of corroboration and the historical pattern, the checked MLS boxes appear inconsistent with the narrative descriptions.
No analysis available
Multiple listings refer to a hot tub, jacuzzi, or whirlpool spa, and several mention spa facilities in the same amenity area. The MLS support is also strong at 15/20. This is enough to treat it as a true shared amenity.
Strong building-level evidence supports a shared swimming pool at ONE Ala Moana. Across the remarks, dozens of listings mention "pool," "infinity pool," "lap pool," "saltwater pool," or "resort-style pool," often alongside other common amenities, which looks consistent rather than copy-paste noise.
There is strong evidence that the building’s pool is heated. Multiple independent remarks explicitly say "heated pool" or "heated pools," while others describe spa/pool combinations that align with the heated amenity; this appears across several listings and agents, not just a single reused description.
At least one remark directly identifies the pool as saltwater. That is explicit confirmation, so the feature is marked true with high confidence.
Very strong evidence that ONE Ala Moana units have in-unit laundry. Across the provided listings, many remarks explicitly reference washer/dryer in-unit or a dedicated laundry room, with phrases like 'full-size washer/dryer,' 'walk-in laundry room,' and 'separate laundry room.' This appears to be consistent across multiple agents and is reinforced by the current MLS data showing washer/dryer in inclusions for 20/20 listings.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for evidence of paid shared laundry such as coin-op, card-operated machines, quarters, or a laundry fee. The listings only describe private in-unit laundry, so there is no public-remark evidence that community laundry exists or is paid.
I reviewed the public remarks for wording like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar floor-by-floor laundry descriptions. The listings mention in-unit laundry rooms or walk-in laundry rooms, but nothing indicates community laundry facilities on every floor.
No analysis available
Assigned/reserved parking is clearly supported across the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention '2 assigned parking stalls,' 'deeded' parking, and specific stall numbers, which is consistent with the high-confidence historical MLS pattern. The evidence appears to be genuine and repeated across many listings, not just a single copy-paste remark.
Covered parking is very well supported for One Ala Moana. Listings describe parking on levels 4 and 5, 'covered parking stalls,' and direct elevator access from parking to the unit, which strongly indicates enclosed/garage-style parking. This is consistent across many listings and aligns with the current MLS data.
I searched for explicit deeded-parking language like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed" and did not find it. Some listings mention included, assigned, or easy-access stalls, but that is not enough to confirm deeded parking.
No analysis available
I looked for any monthly parking charge, parking rental, or additional parking fee and found none. The public remarks describe parking as included, assigned, or convenient, but do not state a separate parking cost.
Guest parking appears to be available at the building level. At least one remark explicitly says 'guest parking,' and several listings describe a building geared toward visitors and residents with guest suites and ample guest access. The repeated references make this a strong building feature rather than a one-off agent error.
Secured-entry parking is well supported for the building. Remarks explicitly reference 'secured parking,' 'secure entry,' and 24-hour concierge/security, which fits the high-end controlled-access environment of the property. The evidence is repeated across multiple listings and is consistent with the MLS pattern.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist or waiting list and found none. The remarks describe included and assigned stalls, but there is no indication that parking is managed through a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I checked the remarks for card/fob-based access terms, including key card access, fob entry, and electronic card readers. The listings do mention secured entry, concierge service, and security, but they do not explicitly confirm a card/fob access system.
Security guard service is strongly supported across the building’s remarks and MLS data. Multiple listings explicitly say "24-hour security," "24/7 security," or "staff are on duty 24/7," which is consistent across agents and not just checkbox copying. This is high-confidence building-level evidence.
I searched for public-remark language indicating a patrol service, such as "security patrol" or "roving security." The building is described as having 24-hour security, concierge, and staff on duty, but that is not the same as an explicitly stated patrol service.
No analysis available
Central air conditioning is strongly supported across the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention "central AC," "central A/C," "AC," and even "quarterly ac service" or "A/C usage" charges, which suggests the feature is standard building-wide rather than a one-off unit upgrade. The repeated mentions across many remarks and the high current MLS checkbox frequency make this a very reliable building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS pattern, with 16 of 20 current listings marked CONCRE. Public remarks across many listings describe the building’s luxury features and amenities but do not explicitly discuss construction material, so the MLS data is the primary evidence here. The repeated checkbox pattern suggests this is not a one-off agent entry.
Double-wall construction is supported by 11 of 20 current MLS listings, which is a meaningful building-level signal. The remarks do not explicitly say 'double wall' or similar, but there is also no evidence suggesting the feature was removed or corrected. Because the checkbox is present in a sizable share of listings, it should be retained.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Steel frame appears in 10 of 20 recent MLS listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly reference steel-frame construction. The evidence looks more like partial MLS consistency than a remark-confirmed building characteristic, so confidence is moderate rather than strong.
Only 5 of 20 MLS records currently list 'slab' and historical confidence was low; none of the public remarks mention 'concrete slab' or foundation details. The inconsistent MLS checkbox usage and lack of corroborating remarks make slab foundation unlikely to be reliably asserted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
5 of 20 MLS entries list above-ground construction (ABOGRO), but public remarks across all listings do not reference this attribute or any recent change. Given the low MLS prevalence and absence from remarks, there is insufficient evidence to assert above-ground construction for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks directly state that "30-day rentals permitted," which is clear evidence that short-term rentals are allowed in this building. This is consistent with the building being usable for vacation/short-term stays under its rules.
I searched for hotel-rental-pool language such as "hotel program," "managed by hotel," or branded pool participation and found nothing. Since there is no evidence of a hotel rental pool, this is marked false.
I looked for phrases like "mandatory pool," "required to participate," or "cannot opt out" and found none. There is also no evidence of any rental pool at all, so mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as "lease expires," "ground lease," "land lease to," or any renewal/expiry year and found nothing. The remarks do not mention any land-tenure or lease-expiration details, so the expiry year cannot be extracted.
I searched the public remarks for VA-related language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted" and found none. The listings focus on amenities, views, and parking, with no indication that VA financing is available.
The remarks directly and repeatedly indicate full building insurance coverage, including explicit wording that the building is 'fully insured' and has '100% hurricane insurance.' That is strong evidence for comprehensive HOA coverage / walls-in style insurance. Confidence is very high.
Strong building-level evidence supports fire sprinklers at ONE Ala Moana. Historical MLS data showed 18/20 listings with FIRSPR, and current remarks repeatedly say "sprinklers" / "fire sprinklers" in unit descriptions. This appears to be consistent building information rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
I looked for language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, including FLSE-related wording and fire inspection pass statements, but found none. The remarks do mention sprinklers and strong security/service features, but those do not confirm a fire/life safety evaluation pass.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are confirmed across many listings, with well over 15/20 remarks referencing them. Examples include “ocean views from every room,” “floor-to-ceiling windows with ocean views,” “panoramic views of the Pacific Ocean,” and “direct Pacific Ocean & Ala Moana Beach Park views.” Evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and looks repeatable rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
Mountain views are repeatedly confirmed throughout the current remarks, with many listings describing "mountain views," "mauka side," "cool mountain breezes," and "lush mountain vistas." The evidence is strong across numerous listings and appears consistently used by multiple agents, not a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
City views are clearly supported by the remarks, including phrases like "city views," "city and mountain views," "cityscape," and "glittering city lights." The feature appears consistently across many listings and is reinforced by multiple agents, indicating it is a real building-level offering.
Coastline views are clearly present in the listing remarks, with phrases such as “framing sweeping views of the coastline,” “overlooks Ala Moana Beach Park and Magic Island,” and “views of Ala Moana Beach Park.” The evidence is repeated across several listings and aligns with the building’s location facing the shoreline.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
While the MLS checkbox shows no SUNRIS entries, at least 2 listings explicitly mention sunrise or morning light (quotes: "breathtaking sunrise" and "entertain you Morning, Day, and Night"), suggesting some units capture eastern/sunrise exposure. Evidence is limited but explicit in agent remarks, so the building should be listed as offering sunrise views.
Sunset views are supported by numerous remarks, including “golden sunsets at Ala Moana Beach,” “evening sunsets,” and “vibrant sunsets through your juliet balcony.” Several listings also reference western/cool-side exposure and Friday fireworks, reinforcing that sunset-oriented views are available in the building.
No analysis available
Multiple remarks directly say you can watch the Friday fireworks from the building, including from the recreational deck. This is clear unit/building view evidence, not just proximity to fireworks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is clear evidence of a resident manager at ONE Ala Moana. Historical MLS data showed 14/20 listings with RESMAN, and at least one current remark directly references "an award-winning resident manager and dedicated staff." The repeated staff/service language suggests this is a real building feature, not merely MLS checkbox noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.