Olaloa II
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Olaloa II
Building Overview
Olaloa II in Mililani Mauka-Launani Valley (1992 concrete building) with a fitness center and on-site resident manager.
About Olaloa II
Olaloa II is a condominium building located in the Mililani Mauka–Launani Valley neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1992 using concrete; detailed information on unit count and building size is not provided in the available MLS data.
Key amenities recorded for the property include a fitness center and a resident manager. Units use split air conditioning systems. According to available records, pets and short-term rentals are not allowed at this property.
Parking is listed as available with assigned stalls and guest parking. The management company is not specified in the provided data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify parking arrangements, management contacts, HOA fees, and other building rules with the listing agent or condominium association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or similar owner-occupancy disclosures and found none. Mentions about 55+ residency, investment use, and no age restrictions on ownership do not provide an owner-occupancy percentage.
I found clear confirmation that Olaloa has elevators, but the public remarks do not specify how many. I searched for phrases like "4 elevators," "four elevators," and other numeric counts, but none were mentioned.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable is supported by both the current MLS pattern and the remarks. One listing explicitly states, "Maintenance fees cover water, sewer, basic cable, internet, and common elements," matching the recurring CABTV checkbox in 15/20 listings. This appears to be consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off note.
The evidence points to a common-area/shared-expense inclusion, but the remarks do not explicitly mention electricity. Multiple listings reference maintenance fees covering "common elements" and the MLS OTCOEX flag appears in 14/20 current listings, so this looks like a building-wide association expense included by agents. Confidence is moderate because the wording supports common area costs generally, not clearly electrical service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in the maintenance fee. The current MLS data shows 0/20 listings with HOTWAT, and multiple remarks mention "tankless water heater" or a new water heater in-unit, which strongly suggests units generate their own hot water rather than receiving building-supplied hot water. This is a strong correction against any prior assumption of included hot water.
Internet is explicitly supported by the remarks and reinforced by the current MLS pattern. One listing says maintenance fees cover "water, sewer, basic cable, internet, and common elements," and 13/20 current listings include INTSER. The repeated checkbox pattern suggests this is a building-level amenity, not a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is extremely well supported. The current MLS data shows SEWER in 19/20 listings, and the public remarks explicitly list sewer among the covered maintenance-fee items. This is one of the strongest building-level fee inclusions in the dataset.
Water inclusion is strongly confirmed across the listings. The current MLS data shows WATER in 19/20 listings, and the remarks explicitly say maintenance fees cover water. This appears to be a stable, building-wide inclusion rather than an agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash is the weakest feature in this set. The MLS amenity checkbox appears in nearly half of the listings, but the public remarks do not describe any car wash, auto wash, or vehicle wash area. Because the historical confidence was already high and there is no contrary evidence, it should remain included, but with lower confidence than the other amenities.
The building has a prominent community center described as a hub for social and physical activities, with staff, meeting rooms, fitness facilities, and organized events. This clearly operates as a shared clubhouse/community center for residents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is well supported across the listing set. Several remarks directly say 'fitness room,' 'exercise room,' or 'weight room,' and the MLS amenities checkbox is consistently checked in most listings. The evidence appears to be building-wide and repeatedly copied across agents, but it is also directly confirmed in the text.
No analysis available
Meeting room/common meeting space is strongly supported. Several listings explicitly reference 'meeting rooms' or 'meeting spaces,' and one remark lists a 'meeting room' among the amenities. The consistency across multiple agents suggests this is a real shared building amenity rather than a one-off checkbox error.
At least 5–6 listings mention private outdoor areas, including phrases like "small fenced lanai with a hose bib," "private lanai," "spacious open patio," and "private back lanai faces the well maintained garden courtyard." These references span different units and agents, indicating that multiple units in the building(s) include patio/lanai-style outdoor spaces. Even though only 5/18 MLS entries checked patio-related boxes, the repeated detailed remarks provide strong evidence that the building offers units with patios/lanai.
This feature is repeatedly confirmed in the remarks. Listings describe 'walking and jogging paths,' 'walking path,' and 'beautiful walking areas,' matching the MLS amenity data. The evidence is strong enough to treat this as a shared building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building appears to offer a recreation area in the form of landscaped common grounds, gardens, and courtyards rather than a single explicitly labeled room. Multiple listings mention garden areas, a community garden, greenhouse/garden club, and pleasant walking spaces. This is consistent across several remarks and aligns with the MLS amenity pattern, though the wording is somewhat indirect.
There is clear evidence that the building offers a recreation room or comparable common activity room. One remark explicitly names a 'recreation room,' while others describe social activity spaces and community gathering areas. The combination of repeated MLS checkbox use and matching remarks supports this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported across many listings for this building, with multiple agents describing it in both unit features and remarks. At least 6-7 current remarks explicitly mention storage lockers/closets/extra storage, including phrases like "additional storage," "storage locker right outside the door," and "assigned storage room," which aligns with the historical MLS pattern and suggests this is a real building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
I searched for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or bike and surfboard storage. The public remarks do not mention any such facility, so this feature is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for salt water pool, saltwater pool, salt pool, or saline pool references. There are no such remarks, and the current building context says there is no pool, so this feature is not supported.
Some units offer in-unit laundry: 3 of 19 MLS listings include WASHER/DRYER in inclusions and several public remarks mention "washer/dryer in the apt" or "washer/dryer hookup inside the unit" (also phrased as "washer/dryer hook-up or free use of community laundry"). Evidence is present but limited to a minority of listings, so confidence is moderate.
Community laundry is strongly supported for Olaloa. Across the provided remarks, multiple listings explicitly mention "laundry facilities," "community laundry area," "community laundry," and "free use of community washers & dryers," matching the MLS amenity pattern (19/20 COMLAU). The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and reads like a true building feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
I searched for coin-op, card-operated, quarters, fees, or any paid laundry language. Instead, the remarks say residents have "free use of community washers & dryers," so the laundry does not appear to require payment.
I looked for explicit references to laundry on each floor, floor-by-floor laundry rooms, or similar wording. The remarks mention community laundry, but not that it is available on every floor, so this feature is not supported by the public remarks.
Parking is clearly available for the building. Multiple remarks mention unit parking such as "1 parking," "2 PARKING STALLS," "1 parking stall," and a stall number (#89), which aligns with the strong MLS history showing parking features on nearly every listing.
Assigned/reserved parking is supported by the listing remarks. Several listings reference exact stall counts or locations like "Parking stall (#89)" and "2 PARKING STALLS," which is consistent with the MLS pattern of assigned parking being checked on most records.
No analysis available
I searched for "deeded parking," "owned stall," and similar phrases and found none. The remarks consistently describe parking as included, assigned, or located by stall number, which does not indicate deeded parking.
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to a separate parking fee, monthly parking charge, or parking rental cost and found nothing. The listings mention parking stalls and guest parking, but do not state that parking costs extra.
Guest parking appears to be an established building feature. Multiple listings explicitly say "Lots of guest parking," including references to guest parking in the community center parking lot and by the maintenance area, confirming the MLS history.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for "parking waitlist," "waiting list," and related phrases, but there were no mentions. The remarks describe available stalls and guest parking without indicating a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for key card access, fob access, card reader, keycard entry, or other explicit electronic access language. The remarks only say the building has a secure entry system, which is not specific enough to confirm card-based access.
Security guard/service appears to be present for the building/community. At least 2 listings explicitly mention it, including '24/7 security patrol' and 'GATED COMMUNITY WITH SECURITY,' with current MLS amenities showing SECGUA in 5 of 20 listings. The wording suggests real on-site or patrol-based security rather than a one-off agent checkbox.
I looked for any mention of patrol service, roving security, or patrolled building language. The remarks explicitly state "24/7 security patrol," so this feature is clearly present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is clearly present in the building. At least 2 current listings explicitly mention it, including 'split A/C' and 'Fujitsu split system A/C,' which strongly corroborates the prior high-confidence MLS data. The repeated phrasing suggests this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox error.
No analysis available
Across the provided remarks, there are 0 mentions of concrete construction. The evidence is weak for this feature and appears to be an MLS checkbox carryover rather than something agents are describing in remarks.
Double-wall construction is strongly supported by the MLS pattern, with 17 of 20 current listings checked and historical consistency also reported as high. Public remarks do not explicitly mention 'double wall,' but there is no evidence suggesting a correction, so this remains a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
Across 18 listings for this building, just 4 show 'masonry & stucco' (MASSTU) in the MLS construction materials, while 14 do not, and no remarks mention masonry or stucco. This pattern suggests data-entry inconsistency rather than an actual masonry/stucco building type. Based on the majority MLS data and lack of supporting remarks, masonry & stucco construction is treated as not present.
No analysis available
None of the public remarks mention 'concrete slab' or similar phrases. Although 9 of 19 current MLS listings have a SLAB checkbox, there is no corroborating language in agent remarks and no prior confidence—evidence is insufficient and likely checkbox noise, so slab foundation is omitted.
No analysis available
Wood frame construction appears in the MLS data for 13 of 20 listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly say 'wood frame' or similar. This looks more like consistent checkbox data than remark-based verification, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit short-term rental permissions, minimum-stay rules, and licensing terms like NUC or TVU, but found none. The remarks focus on senior-living ownership and investment potential, not STR allowance, so there is no evidence STR is permitted.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as hotel-managed programs, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool language, and found none. Because there is no evidence that STR is allowed, hotel pool participation is not supported.
I searched for phrases like "mandatory hotel pool," "must participate," and "cannot opt out," but found nothing. With no evidence of a hotel rental program and no indication STR is allowed, mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like "lease expires," "ground lease ends," "leasehold expiring," and any 4-digit lease expiry year, but found nothing. The remarks do not indicate that this is a leasehold property or provide any lease expiration date.
I searched the public remarks for any VA loan language and found none. The listings discuss community features, age restrictions, and parking, but do not mention VA approval or VA financing.
I looked for HOA insurance or walls-in coverage statements, but none appeared in the remarks. There is no public evidence here to confirm the building is fully insured.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for fire/life safety evaluation or fire inspection approval language and found nothing. Because there is no public remark evidence either way, this remains unconfirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden/courtyard views are mentioned in several listings, not just one agent’s remarks. Phrases like 'rear exterior garden views,' 'faces the well maintained garden courtyard,' and 'courtyard' appear across multiple units, while MLS data shows 6/20 listings tagged GARDEN. Even though 11/20 listings show NONE, the repeated explicit remarks support that some units in the building do have garden views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/19) mention sunset views and 11/19 explicitly list View=NONE. Public remarks consistently reference garden/courtyard views, lanai exposure, 'bright natural sunlight' and tradewinds but do not mention 'sunset', 'western exposure', or 'evening sun.' Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, indicating the building does not offer sunset views.
No analysis available
I looked for wording like fireworks view, can see fireworks from the unit, or watch fireworks from the lanai. The remarks do not mention fireworks views at all, only general views and community surroundings.
No analysis available
This feature is strongly supported: 16/20 current MLS listings include RESMAN, and multiple public remarks explicitly say there is an "on-site manager". One remark also describes community center staff, an activity coordinator, office, and maintenance crew, reinforcing that management is present on the property rather than inferred from checkbox data alone.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.