Olaloa II
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Olaloa II
Building Overview
Olaloa II in Mililani Mauka-Launani Valley (1992 concrete building) with a fitness center and on-site resident manager.
About Olaloa II
Olaloa II is a condominium building located in the Mililani Mauka–Launani Valley neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1992 using concrete; detailed information on unit count and building size is not provided in the available MLS data.
Key amenities recorded for the property include a fitness center and a resident manager. Units use split air conditioning systems. According to available records, pets and short-term rentals are not allowed at this property.
Parking is listed as available with assigned stalls and guest parking. The management company is not specified in the provided data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify parking arrangements, management contacts, HOA fees, and other building rules with the listing agent or condominium association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for occupancy-rate language such as a percentage, majority owner occupied, or highly owner occupied. The remarks only discuss age and ownership restrictions, which do not indicate owner-occupancy percentage.
Multiple remarks explicitly confirm elevator service in the building. No listing states the number of elevators, so the analysis only supports that elevators are present, not how many.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable is supported by both the current MLS pattern and the remarks. One listing explicitly states, "Maintenance fees cover water, sewer, basic cable, internet, and common elements," matching the recurring CABTV checkbox in 15/20 listings. This appears to be consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off note.
The feature appears supported by the current MLS pattern, with 15 of 20 listings including OTCOEX. Public remarks are less explicit, but one listing says maintenance fees cover 'common elements,' which is consistent with shared-area electricity being included. Confidence is solid but not as strong as the water/sewer fields because the remarks do not directly name electricity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is effectively unsupported here: 0 of 20 listings include HOTWAT, while 13 of 20 list WTRHTR. Remarks repeatedly mention 'tankless water heater' or other in-unit water heater language, which is a strong signal that building-supplied hot water is not part of the HOA fees.
Internet is explicitly supported by the remarks and reinforced by the current MLS pattern. One listing says maintenance fees cover "water, sewer, basic cable, internet, and common elements," and 13/20 current listings include INTSER. The repeated checkbox pattern suggests this is a building-level amenity, not a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is overwhelmingly supported: 19 of 20 listings have SEWER in association fee includes. The remarks also explicitly say maintenance fees cover 'water, sewer,' confirming the MLS pattern across multiple listings.
Water inclusion is strongly confirmed. The MLS data shows WATER in 19 of 20 listings, and the remarks directly state that maintenance fees cover 'water,' matching the checkbox data across multiple listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash is the weakest feature in this set. The MLS amenity checkbox appears in nearly half of the listings, but the public remarks do not describe any car wash, auto wash, or vehicle wash area. Because the historical confidence was already high and there is no contrary evidence, it should remain included, but with lower confidence than the other amenities.
The building has a prominent community center described as a hub for social and physical activities, with staff, meeting rooms, fitness facilities, and organized events. This clearly operates as a shared clubhouse/community center for residents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Exercise amenities are strongly supported across the listing set. Multiple remarks explicitly mention 'fitness room,' 'fitness center,' 'exercise room,' and even 'weight room,' with roughly 8+ listings referencing it directly. The consistency across several agents makes this a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
Meeting-room support is very strong across the listings. Multiple remarks directly say 'meeting room,' 'meeting rooms,' 'meeting spaces,' or 'meeting place for special occasions and events,' which confirms a communal meeting facility. The consistency across several listings suggests a genuine building amenity rather than copied MLS boilerplate.
At least 5–6 listings mention private outdoor areas, including phrases like "small fenced lanai with a hose bib," "private lanai," "spacious open patio," and "private back lanai faces the well maintained garden courtyard." These references span different units and agents, indicating that multiple units in the building(s) include patio/lanai-style outdoor spaces. Even though only 5/18 MLS entries checked patio-related boxes, the repeated detailed remarks provide strong evidence that the building offers units with patios/lanai.
This feature is repeatedly confirmed in the remarks. Listings describe 'walking and jogging paths,' 'walking path,' and 'beautiful walking areas,' matching the MLS amenity data. The evidence is strong enough to treat this as a shared building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recreation-area evidence is moderate rather than explicit. Several remarks reference a 'recreation room,' community center activities, garden/courtyard areas, and walking paths, which together indicate a shared recreation space/amenity area. The feature appears supported, but the phrasing varies and may reflect general common grounds rather than a single labeled room.
There is clear evidence that the building offers a recreation room or comparable common activity room. One remark explicitly names a 'recreation room,' while others describe social activity spaces and community gathering areas. The combination of repeated MLS checkbox use and matching remarks supports this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported for this building. Multiple listings mention it in different forms, including "additional storage (15-E)," "storage closet," "storage locker is right outside the door," "exterior storage unit nearby," and "assigned storage room." The evidence is consistent across many remarks and aligns with the high-confidence MLS data, so this appears to be a genuine and frequently advertised feature rather than a copy-paste error.
I searched for surfboard storage, surf storage, board storage, and bike-and-surfboard storage. The listings mention storage closets and storage lockers, but nothing indicates dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for salt-water pool wording such as saltwater pool, saline pool, or salt pool. There is no mention of any pool in the listings, and the provided building context says the property has no pool, so this is false.
Some units offer in-unit laundry: 3 of 19 MLS listings include WASHER/DRYER in inclusions and several public remarks mention "washer/dryer in the apt" or "washer/dryer hookup inside the unit" (also phrased as "washer/dryer hook-up or free use of community laundry"). Evidence is present but limited to a minority of listings, so confidence is moderate.
Community laundry is strongly supported for Olaloa. Multiple listings explicitly mention shared laundry in the building or cluster, including "laundry facilities," "community laundry area," and "free use of community washers & dryers." This appears consistent across several remarks and agents, not just a one-off copy-paste.
I searched for coin-op, quarters, card-operated, paid laundry, or laundry fee language. Instead, multiple listings explicitly state the laundry is free to use, so this feature should be marked false.
I looked for wording such as "laundry on every floor," "each floor has laundry," or similar floor-by-floor laundry language. The public remarks only describe general community laundry access, including free use of community washers and dryers, but nothing indicates every floor has its own laundry room.
Parking is clearly available for this building. Across the provided remarks, multiple listings mention parking directly, including exact stall counts and stall locations, and this is consistent with the historical MLS data showing 20/20 listings with parking features enabled. The evidence is strong and appears repeatedly across different listings, not just a single copied remark.
Assigned/reserved parking is supported by both the MLS data and the remarks. Several listings reference specific stall counts or exact stall locations, which is consistent with assigned parking rather than generic open parking. The pattern appears across multiple listings and is strong enough to include.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed" and found none. The remarks mention "1 parking," "2 PARKING STALLS," and a stall number, which suggests assigned parking, but not deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I looked for any parking charge, monthly parking fee, or rental cost and found nothing. The listings reference parking stalls and guest parking, but no separate parking payment.
Guest parking appears to be an established building feature. Multiple listings explicitly say "Lots of guest parking," including references to guest parking in the community center parking lot and by the maintenance area, confirming the MLS history.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for "parking waitlist," "parking waiting list," or similar wording and found none. The remarks describe available stalls and guest parking without indicating any waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for key card access, fob entry, card reader, and electronic card system wording. The remarks support general security and gated access, but they do not explicitly confirm card/fob access, so this remains false.
Security guard/service appears to be present for the building/community. At least 2 listings explicitly mention it, including '24/7 security patrol' and 'GATED COMMUNITY WITH SECURITY,' with current MLS amenities showing SECGUA in 5 of 20 listings. The wording suggests real on-site or patrol-based security rather than a one-off agent checkbox.
I looked for mentions of security patrol, roving security, or patrolled building language. The remarks directly confirm 24/7 security patrol, which matches the feature definition exactly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is clearly present in the building. At least 2 current listings explicitly mention it, including 'split A/C' and 'Fujitsu split system A/C,' which strongly corroborates the prior high-confidence MLS data. The repeated phrasing suggests this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox error.
There is explicit evidence of window AC in at least 1 listing: "2 window A/C's." Current MLS inclusions also show ACWIUN in 7/20 listings, which supports that some units in the building have window air conditioning. However, most recent remarks reference split AC rather than window units, so this appears to be a building feature present in some units, not consistently described across all listings.
Across the provided remarks, there are 0 mentions of concrete construction. The evidence is weak for this feature and appears to be an MLS checkbox carryover rather than something agents are describing in remarks.
Double-wall construction is strongly supported by the MLS pattern, with 17 of 20 current listings coded DOUWAL. The remarks do not explicitly mention the construction type, but the repeated MLS consistency makes this a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
Across 18 listings for this building, just 4 show 'masonry & stucco' (MASSTU) in the MLS construction materials, while 14 do not, and no remarks mention masonry or stucco. This pattern suggests data-entry inconsistency rather than an actual masonry/stucco building type. Based on the majority MLS data and lack of supporting remarks, masonry & stucco construction is treated as not present.
No analysis available
None of the public remarks mention 'concrete slab' or similar phrases. Although 9 of 19 current MLS listings have a SLAB checkbox, there is no corroborating language in agent remarks and no prior confidence—evidence is insufficient and likely checkbox noise, so slab foundation is omitted.
No analysis available
Wood frame construction appears in the current MLS data for 14 of 20 listings, suggesting it is likely a building-level feature. None of the public remarks explicitly mention 'wood frame' or 'wood frame construction,' so this appears to be driven by MLS checkbox data rather than agent description.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for STR language such as "short-term rental allowed," "legal short-term rental," "NUC," or "TVU," and found none. The building is consistently described as a 55+ senior/retirement community, which strongly suggests standard residential occupancy rather than short-term rentals.
I searched for hotel-pool references like hotel-managed operations, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool language, or rental-program terminology and found none. Since there is no indication that STR is allowed, hotel pool participation is set to false.
I looked for terms such as "mandatory hotel pool," "required to participate," or "cannot opt out" and found none. With no evidence of a hotel rental program and no indication that short-term rentals are allowed, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for land-tenure clues like "lease expires," "ground lease ends," "leasehold," or any 4-digit lease expiry/renewal year. Nothing in the remarks indicates leasehold status or an expiration date.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA-related language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," or "VA loans accepted" and found none. The listings discuss amenities, age restrictions, parking, and unit upgrades, but do not mention VA eligibility.
I looked for HOA insurance disclosures such as fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, or similar wording. The remarks do not mention insurance status, so there is no evidence that the building is fully insured.
Fire sprinkler coverage is not supported by the current public remarks. Across the provided listings, 0 listings explicitly mention a fire sprinkler system, while the MLS checkbox appears in only 5/20 records, suggesting possible copy/paste noise rather than verified building-level evidence.
I searched the remarks for fire/life safety evaluation language, fire inspection approval, and similar compliance statements, but found nothing. There is no public-remarks evidence to confirm the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden/courtyard views are mentioned in several listings, not just one agent’s remarks. Phrases like 'rear exterior garden views,' 'faces the well maintained garden courtyard,' and 'courtyard' appear across multiple units, while MLS data shows 6/20 listings tagged GARDEN. Even though 11/20 listings show NONE, the repeated explicit remarks support that some units in the building do have garden views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings mention sunset views, and many explicitly list View=NONE. Across the public remarks, agents consistently describe garden, courtyard, or generic quiet views rather than sunset or western exposure, so this does not appear to be a building feature.
No analysis available
I looked for statements like fireworks view, see fireworks from the lanai, or unit views of fireworks. The remarks mention garden, courtyard, and general neighborhood views, but nothing about fireworks visibility.
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported for this building. The current MLS data includes RESMAN in 17/20 listings, and several public remarks explicitly reference an "on-site manager" plus on-site staff/maintenance support, which is consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.