Ohualani

All available MLS property records (1 of 1) report the building as built in 1968. No remarks suggest reconstruction or a different construction year, so 1968 is accepted with high confidence.

MLS property data for this building shows a unit on the 7th floor and no evidence of higher floors. With only one listing and no explicit 'x-story' description in remarks, we infer the building has at least 7 floors and tentatively use 7 as the total.

No listing remarks reference the total number of units (e.g., 'x-unit building'), and MLS unit-count data is effectively blank (0). The actual total unit count is unknown; 0 is a placeholder rather than a reliable figure.

The listing confirms that the individual unit is owner-occupied, not that a specific percentage of the building's units are owner-occupied. Because no building-level percentage is mentioned, the current value of 30.00 is retained with low confidence.

The remarks do not mention elevators or provide a building elevator count. No evidence in the remarks confirms or denies the current value, so it is retained with low confidence.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

The single MLS listing does not show central AC as an included association fee item and the public remarks are silent about AC being covered. This indicates AC costs are likely the responsibility of individual owners or are not centrally provided. Therefore, central AC is very likely not included in the fees.

Across the available listing (1/1), cable is not marked as included in the association fee and there is no textual mention of cable service being covered. This suggests residents contract and pay for cable separately. Given the lack of any indication otherwise, cable is very likely not included in the maintenance fees.

No listings explicitly mention common-area electricity or building power. However, OTCOEX appears in 2 of 3 current MLS records, supporting inclusion despite the lack of descriptive remarks.

The remarks clearly state 'fee simple ownership,' indicating a condo-style tenure rather than a cooperative. The MLS does not mark co-op taxes as included in fees. Together this strongly supports that there are no cooperative taxes included in the maintenance fees.

The single available listing does not show electric service as part of the association-included utilities. No phrase like 'electricity included' or 'all utilities included' appears in the remarks. This makes it very likely that unit electricity is billed separately and not included in the HOA fees.

The MLS data does not indicate gas as an included utility, and the public remarks do not reference gas service at all. Buildings that include gas typically mention it as a selling point. This strongly suggests gas is not included in the maintenance fees.

None of the three current listings lists HOTWAT, and two list WTRHTR, a strong indicator that units have their own water heaters. The three public-remark sections also contain no statement that hot water is included.

The building's single MLS listing does not list internet as part of the included HOA services. There is no mention of 'internet included' or 'Wi‑Fi included' in the remarks. This indicates residents likely pay for their own internet and it is not bundled in the maintenance fees.

The building (Ohualani in Waikiki) is not represented as having marina facilities in the MLS data, and the text focuses on location, lanai, parking, and interior features only. There are no suggestions that marina access or fees are part of the HOA. Thus, marina-related costs are almost certainly not included in the maintenance fees.

All 3 current MLS listings list SEWER as included in the association fee. No remarks mention sewer separately or dispute the checkbox, making this a strong building-level feature.

All 3 current MLS listings list WATER as included in the association fee. The public remarks do not discuss water fees, but the consistent data across listings strongly supports inclusion.

In 1 listing, there is no reference to BBQ areas or grills, and the BBQ checkbox is unchecked (0/1). This strongly suggests the building does not provide shared BBQ facilities.

In 1/1 listing reviewed, there is no indication of bike storage in the amenities and no mention of bike rooms or bicycle storage in the remarks. This consistent lack of reference implies the building does not offer a designated bike storage facility.

The sole listing has MARINA unchecked (0/1) and lacks any description of boat docking or marina facilities. This indicates the building does not provide a boat dock or marina access.

The only listing has CRWSH unchecked (0/1) and lacks any reference to a car wash area. This strongly suggests the building does not offer a car wash facility.

The sole listing has CLUHOU unchecked (0/1) and no mention of a clubhouse. This strongly suggests there is no shared clubhouse in the building.

The single listing omits any mention of concierge or front desk services, focusing instead on in-unit features and price. With the MLS concierge field unchecked, it is very likely the building does not offer concierge service.

With DGPRK unchecked (0/1 listings) and no text about pet exercise areas, the building appears not to have a dedicated dog park or dog run.

In 1/1 listings, there are no references to a doorman or lobby attendant, and the MLS checkbox for doorman is not selected. This strongly suggests the building does not provide doorman service.

Across 1 current listing, there is no mention of an exercise room, fitness center, or gym, and EXEROO is unchecked (0/1 listings). With no corroborating historical evidence, the building is unlikely to offer a shared exercise room.

Across 1 listing, LIMSER is unchecked (0/1) with no hint of building-provided car or limo service. This indicates the building does not provide limousine or house car services.

Across 1 listing, MEEROO is unchecked (0/1) and there is no textual reference to meeting or conference facilities. This indicates the building does not offer a shared meeting room.

All 3 listings mention a patio/deck-type outdoor space, specifically a "covered lanai" in two remarks and a "137 sqft lanai" in another. The repeated explicit descriptions across listings, together with historical high confidence and MLS amenity support in 2 of 3 listings, provide strong evidence that the building offers this feature.

The single listing leaves WAJOPA unchecked (0/1) and does not reference on-site jogging or walking paths. This indicates the building does not provide a dedicated jogging/walking path.

The sole listing has PLYGRND unchecked (0/1) and includes no mention of a kids' play area. This suggests the building does not include a shared playground.

The single available listing does not reference any yard, fenced area, or private ground-level outdoor space. With PRIYAR unchecked in MLS amenities and the high-rise Waikiki context, the evidence strongly suggests the building does not offer private yard areas for units.

Across 1 listing, PUTGRE is not selected (0/1) and there is no mention of a putting green. This makes it very likely the building lacks a shared putting green.

With RECARE not selected (0/1 listings) and no language about an amenity deck or recreation area, the building likely does not offer a common recreation area.

1 listing shows RECROO unchecked (0/1) and provides no description of a rec room or game room. This indicates the building probably lacks a shared recreation room.

With RESTAU unchecked (0/1 listings) and no textual evidence of in-building dining, the building appears not to contain a restaurant or similar dining amenity.

The one listing shows ROOFDCK not selected (0/1) and contains no description of rooftop amenities. It is therefore very likely there are no common rooftop features for residents.

With SAUNA not selected (0/1 listings) and no textual mention of sauna facilities, it is very likely the building does not offer a shared sauna.

Across 1/1 recent listing, there is no mention of storage units, storage lockers, or extra storage in either the remarks or the MLS amenities fields. Given the complete absence of any storage-related references or checkboxes, this building is likely not marketed as having dedicated storage units.

The listing directly confirms surfboard storage as an additional amenity. The repeated description provides strong evidence that the building or residence includes built-in surfboard storage.

The single available listing has TENCOU unchecked (0/1) and no remarks about tennis. This makes it very likely the building has no tennis court.

Across 1 listing, TRACHU is unchecked (0/1) and there is no mention of a trash chute. This suggests the building likely does not have a central trash chute system, though individual floor setups are not described.

1/1 listing simply notes that the unit includes '1 parking space' with no mention of valet or valet parking. Combined with VALET being unchecked in MLS amenities, this strongly indicates the building does not offer valet service.

Across 1/1 listings, there are no phrases like 'gated,' 'fenced,' or 'walled' describing the property, and the relevant MLS amenity is not marked. This indicates the building is not characterized as having a perimeter wall or fence as a notable feature.

The single listing shows WHIRLP unchecked (0/1) and contains no references to a hot tub or whirlpool. This suggests there is no shared whirlpool or spa amenity.

Across 1/1 listings, none check a pool amenity and no remarks reference a swimming pool. Given that agents usually market a pool as a key feature if available, this absence strongly suggests the building does not offer a pool.

Since 0/1 listings indicate any pool and none mention a heated pool, there is no evidence that a heated pool exists in the building. Without a pool at all, a heated pool can be confidently ruled out.

The remarks do not mention any swimming pool or salt-water pool. The building context also indicates that the building has no pool.

All 3 of 3 current listings support in-unit laundry. Two remarks explicitly say "in-unit stacked washer/dryer," while the third states "washer and dryer" and "washer-dryer included," providing strong confirmation across multiple listings.

Across the single available listing, the MLS amenities do not include community laundry and the remarks only highlight in-unit washer/dryer as a rare feature, with no reference to shared laundry rooms or facilities. Given the complete lack of mention or checkbox data, community laundry is treated as absent for this building based on current evidence.

The listing only describes an in-unit washer and dryer. It contains no evidence of paid or shared laundry facilities.

The remarks mention an in-unit stacked washer/dryer, but do not describe shared laundry facilities on any floor. No evidence confirms community laundry availability throughout the building.

Parking is strongly supported across the building: 3 of 3 current listings include parking-related MLS features, and one remark explicitly says "1 parking space." The MLS data and public remarks consistently confirm that the building offers parking.

Assigned parking is indicated on all 3 current listings through the MLS ASSIGN feature. Although the remarks only state "1 parking space" and do not explicitly say assigned or reserved, the consistent building-level MLS designation provides strong evidence that parking is assigned.

In the single listing, the MLS parking_features do not include any covered, carport, or garage codes, and the narrative only mentions '1 parking space' without describing it as covered. Given agents typically highlight covered or garage parking, this strongly suggests the building’s stalls are uncovered/open.

A parking space is referenced, but its ownership status is not specified. No phrases indicating deeded or owned parking were found.

There are no references to EV charging or stations in the sole listing’s remarks, and the EVCHRG checkbox is not selected in the MLS data. Because EV charging is a notable amenity that agents almost always highlight, this is strong evidence the building does not offer EV charging at this time.

The remarks do not mention a parking fee, monthly parking charge, parking rental, or additional parking cost. A monthly parking amount cannot be determined.

The single MLS record does not include the GUEST parking feature, and the public remarks are silent on guest or visitor parking. Since guest parking is typically marketed when available, this strongly indicates the building lacks dedicated guest parking.

No secured or gated parking is mentioned in the listing remarks, and the SECENT checkbox is not marked in MLS. With 0/1 listings indicating secure entry, the balance of evidence suggests there is no dedicated secured-entry parking area.

The only listing just notes '1 parking space' and omits any reference to tandem or back-to-back parking. Given the TANDEM feature is not checked in MLS and tandem stalls are usually explicitly disclosed, it is very likely that the building does not use tandem parking.

Neither the checklist data nor the narrative remarks for the single listing mention valet or attended parking. Because valet service is a high-profile amenity that agents reliably advertise, this is extremely strong evidence that the building does not offer valet parking.

The listing mentions one parking space but does not refer to a parking waitlist or waiting list. The existence of a waitlist cannot be confirmed.

The sole listing does not mention a keyed or fob-access elevator or any restricted elevator security. With the related MLS amenity unchecked, this indicates the building likely does not have secure/keyed elevator access.

The remarks focus on the unit layout, views, and amenities and provide no evidence of a card- or fob-based building entry system.

Across 1/1 current listings, no remarks mention a security guard, on-site security personnel, or 24/7 security. The MLS amenities also do not indicate security guard service, suggesting the building does not offer staffed guard security.

The listing does not describe any security patrol service. The building context also indicates no security guard.

In 1/1 listings, there are no mentions of security cameras, CCTV, or video surveillance. Combined with the unchecked MLS security system field, this suggests the building does not advertise or provide video security as a feature.

Across 1 listing, no MLS checkboxes for central AC are selected and the remarks never mention 'central air', 'central AC', or 'HVAC'. Given that central AC is a major selling point that agents almost always advertise, this strongly suggests the building does not have central air conditioning. Evidence is limited to one agent but is consistent between the structured data and remarks.

In the single available listing, no split-AC-related inclusions (ACSPL) are marked and the narrative remarks contain no terms like 'split AC', 'mini-split', or 'ductless'. Agents generally highlight split systems when they exist, so the absence of both checkbox and textual mentions points to no split AC in this building. Evidence is limited but internally consistent.

The single listing has no ACWIUN flag set and contains no phrases such as 'window AC', 'window unit', or 'wall AC'. Given that other minor features are highlighted but AC is not, it is more likely that window AC is not a defined feature of the building. The conclusion is based on one consistent but limited data point.

All 3 of 3 current listings identify the building as having CONCRE construction materials, consistent with the previously high-confidence determination. None of the 3 public remarks explicitly uses phrases such as "concrete construction" or "reinforced concrete," so the evidence comes primarily from consistent MLS data rather than listing-agent descriptions.

The single current listing omits double-wall construction and instead identifies concrete as the construction type. No remarks mention double-wall construction.

No current listings (1/1) indicate hollow tile construction, and remarks are silent on it. This makes hollow tile construction very unlikely for this building.

The single MLS listing does not list masonry/stucco and provides no textual support for it. This indicates the building is not categorized as masonry/stucco construction in MLS.

1/1 listings mark concrete construction and do not check steel frame. With no remarks indicating steel-frame construction, it is very likely this is not a steel-frame building in MLS terms.

The 1/1 current listing does not identify slab construction and provides no textual support for a slab foundation. Therefore, the building is very likely not recorded in MLS as slab construction.

No analysis available

1/1 current MLS listings omit wood-frame construction and instead mark concrete as the construction type. No remarks mention wood-frame construction, so it is very likely not applicable for this building.

Above-ground construction is not checked in the only MLS record and is not mentioned in remarks. This strongly suggests the building is not flagged as above-ground construction in MLS.

Brick construction is not checked in the 1/1 MLS listing and is not mentioned in remarks. This strongly suggests the building is not classified as brick construction.

Single-wall construction is not selected in the 1/1 MLS listing and is incompatible with the recorded concrete construction. No remarks suggest single-wall construction.

The remarks describe the property as suitable for an owner-occupant or investor and state "OWNER OCCUPIED," but do not explicitly permit or prohibit short-term rentals. No references to STR, vacation rentals, NUC, TVU, or a minimum rental period were found.

The remarks contain no reference to a hotel rental pool, hotel rental program, hotel management, or branded rental program. Because short-term-rental permission is not established, hotel-pool participation is false.

The listing does not mention mandatory hotel-pool participation, required rental-program enrollment, or an inability to opt out. Since short-term-rental permission is not established, mandatory hotel-pool participation is false.

The single available listing describes the unit as 'fee simple ownership.' Thus, the building clearly offers fee simple units (1 of 1 listings observed are Fee Simple), though other tenures may also exist.

The only available listing is explicitly fee simple and does not reference any lease or lease rent, and MLS tenure data shows no leasehold flag. With limited data, we treat leasehold as not evidenced in this building, but with moderate (not absolute) confidence.

Because the listing identifies the property as fee simple, there is no applicable land-lease expiry year. No lease-expiry or lease-renewal year was mentioned.

The remarks do not mention VA approval, VA financing, or acceptance of VA loans. Therefore, VA approval cannot be confirmed from the public remarks.

The remarks do not discuss HOA insurance, full building coverage, comprehensive insurance, or walls-in coverage. There is no explicit evidence that the building is fully insured, so the feature is set to false with medium-low confidence.

No current listing or remarks indicate the presence of a fire sprinkler system, and the relevant MLS checkbox is unchecked. Because agents frequently omit this detail even when present, this is a low-confidence 'false' based on lack of evidence rather than proof of absence.

The remarks do not reference a fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE approval, fire safety certification, or a passed fire inspection. With no explicit evidence of compliance, the feature is set to false with medium-low confidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Across 1 listing, no remarks or MLS view fields mention ocean, water, or makai views. Evidence is limited to a single unit description focused on location and interior features, so ocean views cannot be confirmed.

Mountain views are strongly confirmed across the building. Two listings explicitly state "unparalleled views ... and Mountains," while all 3 current MLS listings contain MOUNTA in their view descriptions.

For the single listing reviewed, there are no mentions of Diamond Head, DH, or crater views in remarks or view fields. There is insufficient evidence that any units offer Diamond Head views.

City views are supported by current MLS data in 2 of 3 listings, indicating that at least some units may offer this feature. None of the supplied public remarks explicitly mention city or downtown views, so the evidence is weaker than for mountain or marina views.

The single listing provides no indication of coastal or shoreline vistas. Thus coastline views are not verifiable at this time.

The single listing does not reference garden, courtyard, or landscaped views in remarks or view fields. There is no clear evidence of garden views in this building.

Across 1 listing, nothing indicates a golf course outlook. The absence of golf-related view terms means golf course views are not currently verifiable.

Marina/canal views are strongly confirmed across multiple listings. Two remarks specifically quote "views of the Ala Wai Canal," and all 3 current MLS listings contain MARCAN, consistent with the historical high-confidence finding.

With only 1 listing and no references to sunrise or morning light, sunrise views cannot be established for this building.

For the 1 listing, there is no explicit or implied reference to sunset or evening views. Current evidence does not support confirming sunset views for the building.

Across 1 listing, there are no mentions of a cemetery, which agents usually disclose due to sensitivity. Given this and the lack of any cemetery view codes, it is very likely the building does not have cemetery views.

The remarks describe views of the Ala Wai Canal, Golf Course, and Mountains, but do not mention fireworks views from the residence. Proximity to the Waikiki Shell does not establish a fireworks view.

No analysis available

No analysis available

The only listing provides no information about pets and MLS does not mark a 'no pets' restriction. With no explicit language either allowing or prohibiting pets, there is insufficient evidence to confirm that pets are allowed, so this field is treated as not confirmed/false by default.

The available listing does not reference a resident/on-site manager, and the corresponding MLS amenity is not selected. Given typical underreporting of this feature, we currently assume no resident manager with low confidence.

1/1 listing frames the property as owner-occupied with no language about hotel rental pools, front desk, or condotel/condo-hotel operation. With CONDOT not selected in the MLS style data, it is very likely the building is not operated as a condotel.

The listing clearly notes 'fee simple ownership,' which aligns with condominium, not co-op, ownership. With no cooperative terminology in the remarks or MLS fee-includes data, the building is almost certainly not a co-op.