Ocean Ridge at Makakilo
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ocean Ridge at Makakilo
Building Overview
Ocean Ridge at Makakilo in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale — built 2006, sunset views, covered and guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Ocean Ridge at Makakilo
Ocean Ridge at Makakilo is a residential building in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 2006. Size and specific construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Based on MLS data, notable features include sunset views and parking options that list available covered stalls and guest parking. The records indicate that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the available MLS information.
Buyers should verify all details with the listing agent or management, as this narrative is based solely on MLS-derived data and does not include information beyond what is provided in those records.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
None of the listings provide any percentage or qualitative description of how many units are owner-occupied versus rented. Without explicit information, the owner_occupancy rate cannot be determined.
All provided remarks describe townhome-style living with garages, parking, and stairs implied but never reference any elevators. Because the number of elevators is never stated, this field remains unknown rather than guessed.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 13 of 13 current listings include OTCOEX/common area electricity in association_fee_includes. No remarks suggest separate billing, and there is no conflicting evidence, so this appears to be a consistent building-level HOA item.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listings include hot water in the HOA fees, and 11 of 13 instead show WTRHTR, a strong indicator that hot water is not included. The public remarks reinforce this by describing unit water heaters rather than building-supplied hot water.
Internet is explicitly mentioned in one remark as included in the fees, and current MLS data shows 5 of 13 listings with INTSER. The evidence is moderate rather than universal, but it is enough to include internet as an available HOA benefit in the building.
No analysis available
All 13 of 13 current listings include sewer in association_fee_includes. There are no conflicting remarks, so sewer appears to be a standard HOA-covered expense for the building.
Water is included in association fees on all 13 of 13 current listings. The remarks align with the MLS data and provide no sign of separate water charges.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence from many listings supports patio/deck amenities. At least 8+ remarks mention "lanai," "patio," or "patio deck," including phrases like "private lanai," "open lanai," and "weatherproof patio deck." The consistency across multiple agents indicates this is not just MLS checkbox noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Very strong evidence that the building offers private yard space. Multiple listings explicitly say "private fenced yard," "private yard," and "backyard oasis," with several also describing fenced outdoor areas for BBQs, pets, and entertaining. The repeated direct mentions across many remarks make this highly reliable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All provided remarks were reviewed for terms like surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or similar amenities and none were present. Given the lack of any explicit reference, it is moderately likely that the building does not offer dedicated surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks describe views, parking, interior finishes, yard/lanai space, and community features but do not reference any type of pool, including saltwater. I searched for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', and 'saline pool' and found no matches, so this feature is set to false due to lack of evidence.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the building. Current MLS inclusions show washer/dryer for 13 of 13 listings, and remarks explicitly mention phrases like 'washer and dryer with in the garage' and 'in-unit laundry.' This appears consistent across multiple listings and agents, not just a copied checkbox.
No analysis available
Searched for indications such as 'coin-op', 'coin laundry', 'card-operated', 'laundry fee', or 'paid laundry' and found none in any of the remarks. Given the consistent description of private laundry in each home and no hint of shared paid facilities, it is likely there is no paid community laundry.
Remarks emphasize private, in-unit or in-garage laundry for these townhomes and never mention any community laundry rooms or laundry on each floor. Searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'community laundry room', and 'shared laundry' and found none, so it is likely there is no community laundry on every floor.
Parking is strongly supported across the listings: every unit has some form of parking in MLS data, and many remarks explicitly mention a 2-car garage plus driveway spaces. Multiple agents describe the same setup, suggesting this is a building-level feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Covered parking is clearly present building-wide. All listings in the MLS data indicate covered/garage parking, and the remarks repeatedly confirm garages, including attached/enclosed garages and two-car garages. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents.
I looked for terms like deeded parking, owned stall, and parking included in deed. The remarks show plentiful parking, but none explicitly state that the stalls are deeded with the unit.
No analysis available
I searched for monthly parking charges, parking rental fees, or additional parking costs. The listings mention garage, driveway, and guest parking, but no separate parking fee is stated.
Guest parking is well supported by both MLS codes and remarks. Several listings explicitly describe guest/visitor parking, including a remark citing '16 guest parking stalls,' which is strong corroboration. This appears to be a real community amenity, not just checkbox noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist or waiting-list language. The remarks instead emphasize ample parking and guest stalls, with no indication of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
Reviewed all remarks for terms such as key card, fob, card reader, and controlled electronic entry but found none. References to security are limited to individual unit alarm/monitoring systems, not a building-wide card/fob access system.
No analysis available
Searched all remarks for indications of a patrol service, including phrases like security patrol, roving security, and patrolled community, but found no evidence. In the absence of any mention, a dedicated security patrol is assumed unlikely.
No analysis available
No current listings (0/12) have central AC codes (ACCEN/CENAC) in unit_features; instead, remarks repeatedly highlight 'split A/C in every room', 'four split AC units', and similar language, indicating individual split systems rather than a building-wide central system. Only 2 listings show ACCEN in inclusions, likely referencing specific equipment, not a central building system.
Split AC is strongly supported across the listings. At least 9-10 remarks explicitly mention it with details like 'throughout,' 'in every room,' or '4 split AC units,' and the current MLS checkbox data shows ACSPL in 11 of 13 listings. This is consistent, repeated evidence across multiple agents, not just a one-off mention.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Double wall construction is strongly supported by the MLS history: all 13 of 13 current listings mark DOUWAL. The public remarks do not explicitly restate it, but there is no contrary evidence, so this appears to be a stable building-level construction attribute rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Slab foundation is supported by 6 of 13 current MLS listings. The remarks do not explicitly say 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation,' but nothing conflicts with the MLS data, so this is a moderate-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction appears in only 4 of 13 current MLS listings and is not discussed in the remarks. Because there is no explicit confirmation and the checkbox appears inconsistently across listings, this feature is only weakly supported at the building level.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR allowed, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or hotel-style rental language. Nothing in the remarks suggests short-term rentals are allowed in this building.
I looked for hotel rental pool, hotel-managed, or branded program references like Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool. None were found, so there is no evidence of a hotel rental pool.
I searched for wording such as required participation, mandatory rental program, or cannot opt out. The remarks contain no such language, and there is no evidence of a mandatory hotel pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for ground lease, leasehold, lease expiry, and renewal language such as "lease expires" or "ground lease ends." Nothing in the remarks indicates a leasehold tenure or a lease expiration year.
The listings repeatedly confirm VA financing availability at the project level. Phrases like "VA approved" and multiple "VA assumable" references provide strong, direct evidence.
The remarks discuss maintenance fees and what they include (e.g., internet, water, trash) but never state that the HOA provides full or walls-in building insurance. Due to this lack of explicit evidence, the building is assumed not to be confirmed as fully insured in the remarks.
No analysis available
The listings focus on views, parking, interiors, and amenities but do not mention any fire/life safety evaluation or certification. Given the complete absence of such references, this is set to false by default, as there is no evidence the building has a documented FLSE pass in the remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported across the building. At least 12 of 13 current listings show OCEAN in the MLS view descriptions, and remarks repeatedly describe 'ocean views,' 'panoramic ocean views,' and views from the primary suite and lanai. This looks like consistent building-wide copy rather than a one-off agent claim.
Mountain views are well supported by both MLS data and remarks. Eleven of 13 current listings include MOUNTA, and several remarks specifically call out 'mountain views' and 'majestic mountain views.' The evidence is consistent across multiple listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Coastline views are present for some units in the building. Six of 13 current listings show COASTL, and remarks include phrases like 'ocean and coastline views' and 'the leeward coast in the distance.' The evidence is solid, though less pervasive than ocean or sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise views have weaker MLS coverage but are explicitly mentioned in remarks. One listing says the residence captures 'stunning sunrises,' and the feature also appears in the current view descriptions for 2 of 13 listings. This suggests sunrise exposure exists for some units, though not universally.
Sunset views are very strongly supported. Eleven of 13 current listings include SUNSET, and the remarks repeatedly reference 'stunning sunsets,' 'colorful sunsets,' and west-side sunset views from yards and lanais. This aligns with the prior high-confidence history and appears consistently verified.
No analysis available
No listing remarks mention fireworks views or watching fireworks from the building or lanais. The views described are of the ocean, coastline, mountains, and sunsets only, so there is no evidence to support a fireworks view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.