Ocean Ridge at Makakilo
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ocean Ridge at Makakilo
Building Overview
Ocean Ridge at Makakilo in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale — built 2006, sunset views, covered and guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Ocean Ridge at Makakilo
Ocean Ridge at Makakilo is a residential building in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 2006. Size and specific construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Based on MLS data, notable features include sunset views and parking options that list available covered stalls and guest parking. The records indicate that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the available MLS information.
Buyers should verify all details with the listing agent or management, as this narrative is based solely on MLS-derived data and does not include information beyond what is provided in those records.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the listings provide any percentage or qualitative description of how many units are owner-occupied versus rented. Without explicit information, the owner_occupancy rate cannot be determined.
All provided remarks describe townhome-style living with garages, parking, and stairs implied but never reference any elevators. Because the number of elevators is never stated, this field remains unknown rather than guessed.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV does not appear to be a building-wide fee inclusion. Only 1 of 14 current listings checks CABTV, and the remarks across multiple listings consistently mention other inclusions like internet and water but never cable. This looks more like an occasional checkbox entry than a verified common HOA benefit.
No provided listing explicitly quotes "common area electricity" or "common electric," but current MLS data consistently reports OTCOEX in 15/15 listings. Historical evidence was previously high confidence, and the remarks' fee statement ("Fees include: fiber optic internet, water, trash, etc.") is consistent with common building services being included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings mention hot water being included in the maintenance fee, while 12 of 15 MLS records list WTRHTR. Multiple remarks reference individual Rheem water heaters, supporting the established conclusion that hot water is not included.
Seven of 15 listings identify internet service in the association-fee inclusions, and one agent explicitly states that fees include fiber optic internet. The consistent MLS support plus the direct remark makes this strong evidence rather than an isolated copy-paste claim.
No analysis available
Sewer is listed as included in association fees for all 15 current listings. No remarks contradict this, so the evidence is exceptionally consistent across the building.
Water appears in the fee inclusions for all 15 listings, with an explicit remark confirming that fees include water. The unanimous MLS evidence and direct agent statement strongly establish this building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence supports patio/deck amenities for this building. At least 8 listings explicitly mention outdoor spaces such as "lanai," "patio," "covered lanai," "private fenced lanai," and "weatherproof patio deck," across multiple agents and separate remarks. The consistency suggests this is a real building feature, not just MLS copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Very strong evidence that the building offers private yard space. Multiple listings explicitly say "private fenced yard," "private yard," and "backyard oasis," with several also describing fenced outdoor areas for BBQs, pets, and entertaining. The repeated direct mentions across many remarks make this highly reliable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage-related features appear in 5 of 15 MLS records, but no listing explicitly confirms a dedicated storage unit or storage locker. Remarks instead reference unit-specific storage such as custom closet systems, abundant cabinetry, garage storage, and optional overhead racks, so the feature is supported moderately rather than conclusively.
All provided remarks were reviewed for terms like surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or similar amenities and none were present. Given the lack of any explicit reference, it is moderately likely that the building does not offer dedicated surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks describe views, parking, interior finishes, yard/lanai space, and community features but do not reference any type of pool, including saltwater. I searched for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', and 'saline pool' and found no matches, so this feature is set to false due to lack of evidence.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the building: 15/15 current MLS listings include washer/dryer. The remarks explicitly cite "in-unit laundry" and a garage with "washer and dryer," providing confirmation beyond checkbox data, although only a subset of the supplied remarks mentions it directly.
No analysis available
Searched for indications such as 'coin-op', 'coin laundry', 'card-operated', 'laundry fee', or 'paid laundry' and found none in any of the remarks. Given the consistent description of private laundry in each home and no hint of shared paid facilities, it is likely there is no paid community laundry.
Remarks emphasize private, in-unit or in-garage laundry for these townhomes and never mention any community laundry rooms or laundry on each floor. Searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'community laundry room', and 'shared laundry' and found none, so it is likely there is no community laundry on every floor.
Parking is strongly supported across the listings. Every MLS record indicates some parking, and the remarks consistently describe features like “2-car garage,” “driveway parking,” and “4 parking spaces.”
Assigned parking is supported by the MLS coding in a minority of listings, but the public remarks mostly emphasize garage and driveway parking rather than explicitly saying “assigned” or “reserved.” Because the building appears to offer multiple parking configurations, this feature is likely present for at least some units.
Covered parking is strongly confirmed across multiple listings and agents: at least 13 remarks explicitly mention a "2-car garage," "two car garage," "attached garage," or "enclosed garage." Several also describe additional driveway or guest parking, while the MLS data marks covered/garage parking on all 15 of 15 listings, indicating the feature is building-wide rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
The listings establish that units have garage and driveway parking. However, there is no explicit public-remark confirmation that the parking is deeded or separately owned.
No analysis available
The remarks describe garages, driveways, and guest parking but provide no parking-fee information. No evidence confirms a recurring monthly parking charge.
Guest parking is well supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention guest/visitor parking, including “nearby guest parking,” “ample guest parking,” and even “16 guest parking stalls,” which suggests this is a shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings describe ample guest parking and multiple garage or driveway spaces. Nothing indicates that residents must wait for or join a parking allocation list.
No analysis available
Reviewed all remarks for terms such as key card, fob, card reader, and controlled electronic entry but found none. References to security are limited to individual unit alarm/monitoring systems, not a building-wide card/fob access system.
No analysis available
Searched all remarks for indications of a patrol service, including phrases like security patrol, roving security, and patrolled community, but found no evidence. In the absence of any mention, a dedicated security patrol is assumed unlikely.
No analysis available
No current listings (0/12) have central AC codes (ACCEN/CENAC) in unit_features; instead, remarks repeatedly highlight 'split A/C in every room', 'four split AC units', and similar language, indicating individual split systems rather than a building-wide central system. Only 2 listings show ACCEN in inclusions, likely referencing specific equipment, not a central building system.
Split AC is strongly validated across the building: at least 10 current remarks explicitly mention split AC, including multiple descriptions of units in every room or four strategically placed units. Combined with ACSPL appearing in 13/15 listings and the historical high-confidence assessment, this is a genuine building/unit feature rather than simple checkbox copy-paste.
No analysis available
Across the provided remarks, there are 0 explicit mentions of concrete construction. The descriptions repeatedly emphasize interior upgrades, views, parking, and split AC, which suggests the MLS construction field may be copy/paste data rather than verified building material information.
Double-wall construction is recorded in 14/15 current listings. Although none of the supplied remarks explicitly mention a double wall or two-wall construction, the feature is strongly supported by consistent MLS data across nearly all listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Slab foundation appears in 7/15 current MLS records, which provides moderate but not conclusive support. The remarks focus on views, upgrades, parking, and amenities and contain no explicit foundation language, so the evidence may reflect partially inconsistent MLS checkbox usage.
No analysis available
Wood-frame construction appears in 5/15 current MLS records, providing some checkbox evidence. However, no remarks quote or describe wood-frame construction, so the evidence is limited and may reflect inconsistent MLS data entry rather than verified building construction.
Above-ground construction appears in only 4 of 13 current MLS listings and is not discussed in the remarks. Because there is no explicit confirmation and the checkbox appears inconsistently across listings, this feature is only weakly supported at the building level.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for short-term-rental permissions, vacation-rental terms, NUC, TVU, minimum-stay requirements, and occupancy restrictions. No evidence establishes that short-term rentals are allowed.
The remarks contain no evidence that the building participates in a hotel rental pool or hotel-operated rental program. Because short-term-rental permission is not established, this feature is false under the prerequisite rule.
No listing indicates that owners must participate in a hotel rental pool or cannot opt out. Since short-term-rental permission is not established, mandatory hotel-pool participation must also be false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for leasehold, ground lease, lease expiration, lease expiry, and renewal language. No 4-digit expiration year was found.
The listings repeatedly confirm VA financing availability and assumable VA loans. This is direct, consistent evidence across multiple remarks.
The remarks discuss maintenance fees and what they include (e.g., internet, water, trash) but never state that the HOA provides full or walls-in building insurance. Due to this lack of explicit evidence, the building is assumed not to be confirmed as fully insured in the remarks.
No analysis available
The listings focus on views, parking, interiors, and amenities but do not mention any fire/life safety evaluation or certification. Given the complete absence of such references, this is set to false by default, as there is no evidence the building has a documented FLSE pass in the remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
At least 10 of the provided remarks explicitly mention ocean views, including "sweeping ocean views," "stunning ocean and coastline views," and "ocean views from all rooms in the house." This is consistent with the current MLS data showing OCEAN in 14 of 15 listings and strongly supports the building offering ocean-view units.
Approximately 7 of the provided remarks explicitly reference mountain views, including "sweeping mountain views," "majestic mountain views," and "breathtaking views of the mountains." The remarks from multiple listings and the current MLS data showing MOUNTA in 13 of 15 listings provide strong building-level support.
Diamond Head views are clearly present in some units. Remarks include phrases such as "Diamond Head to Ko Olina," "Honolulu and Diamond Head views," and "views stretching from Diamond Head." MLS coverage is lighter than for ocean or sunset, but the explicit remarks are strong enough to support the feature.
No analysis available
At least 3 listings explicitly mention coastline or coast-related views, including "Ewa coastline," "ocean and coastline views," and "the leeward coast in the distance." This aligns with current MLS data showing COASTL in 8 of 15 listings and supports including coastline views as an available building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise views are present in at least some units. One listing explicitly says the home captures "stunning sunrises," and the MLS data also has sunrise-related view descriptions in a smaller subset of listings. Evidence is not as broad as ocean/sunset, but it is direct and credible.
Sunset views are very strongly supported across the building. Multiple remarks reference "stunning sunsets," "colorful sunsets," and "those gorgeous Oahu sunsets," matching the high MLS coverage. This looks like a real and consistent building-level feature.
No analysis available
No listing remarks mention fireworks views or watching fireworks from the building or lanais. The views described are of the ocean, coastline, mountains, and sunsets only, so there is no evidence to support a fireworks view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.