Oahuan Ltd
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Oahuan Ltd
Building Overview
Oahuan Ltd in Makiki-Tantalus (built 1956) features a pool; parking available. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Oahuan Ltd
Oahuan Ltd is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records the building was built in 1956. Size (unit count/square footage) and construction type are not specified in the MLS-provided data.
Key features include a shared pool for resident use. Parking is listed as available. Pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are prohibited, per the MLS information provided.
Management company information is unknown in the MLS data. Buyers should verify parking arrangements, any association fees, management details, and policy enforcement directly with the seller or managing agent, as this summary is based solely on MLS data and may be incomplete.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for an owner-occupancy percentage and phrases such as "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." Nothing indicates the percentage of owner-occupied units, so the value remains unknown.
The remarks consistently characterize the building as a walk-up and do not mention any elevators. This strongly supports the current value of 0 elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable service appears to be included in at least some units, with several remarks directly mentioning cable and one noting maintenance fees include 'all utilities, cable, and internet included.' The evidence is not universal across all listings, so this is a building-level feature available in some listings rather than every unit.
Common area expenses are directly mentioned in several listings, including "common area maintenance" and "common area upkeep." This aligns with the broad current MLS support of 13/16 listings and appears across multiple remarks rather than a single isolated claim.
No analysis available
At least 10 listings explicitly mention "electricity included," "includes electricity," or "all utilities" in the maintenance fees. The evidence is exceptionally strong because every current MLS record includes ELECTR and the remarks from multiple agents consistently confirm it.
No analysis available
At least 5 listings explicitly mention "hot water" as included, including statements that fees include "electricity, water, hot water, sewer" and "everything except cable." HOTWAT appears on 13/16 current listings, so the isolated WTRHTR entry is likely an inconsistent listing-level record rather than evidence of a building-wide change.
Internet is strongly supported at the building level. The MLS is nearly universal and the remarks repeatedly say 'internet included' or 'internet service' is part of the fee, showing consistent support across multiple listings and agents.
No analysis available
At least 9 listings directly mention "sewer included" or list sewer among the utilities covered by maintenance fees. This is consistently confirmed across multiple agents and is supported by unanimous current MLS data.
At least 10 listings explicitly say "water included" or list water among the utilities covered by the maintenance fee. The remarks repeatedly pair water with electricity and sewer, and the 14/16 MLS support indicates strong building-level inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports patio/deck access in the building. At least several listings reference a "lanai," "private balcony," or "spacious lanai to enjoy outdoor meals," which indicates usable outdoor space is available in some units. This is consistent across multiple remarks and does not look like a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no supporting evidence in the remarks for private yard space. Across the listings, agents describe lanais, balconies, pool views, and common landscaping, but not private or enclosed yards; the lone MLS checkbox appears unsupported by the text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All provided public remarks were reviewed for terms like surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or combined bike and surfboard storage and none were present. The remarks focus on the pool, community laundry, utilities, parking options, and location amenities but do not reference any surfboard-specific storage. Given this lack of evidence, it is moderately likely that the building does not offer dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool is strongly validated across the building: at least 12 of the provided listing remarks explicitly mention a pool or swimming pool, using phrases such as 'community swimming pool,' 'tranquil courtyard pool,' and 'lanai overlooking the pool.' The repeated, feature-specific descriptions across multiple listings and agents, together with 16/16 current MLS amenity entries, indicate a legitimate shared building amenity rather than an isolated copy-paste error.
No analysis available
All provided listings describe the presence and condition of the pool but none indicate that it is a saltwater or saline system. I searched for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'salt pool', and 'saline' and found no mentions, so the pool is assumed not to be saltwater based on available information.
No analysis available
Community laundry is strongly validated across the building. At least 9 current listing remarks explicitly mention community or on-site laundry, including descriptions of facilities downstairs, two laundry areas, and clotheslines; together with COMLAU checked in 16/16 listings, this is consistent evidence from multiple listings rather than an isolated copy-paste error.
The public remarks confirm shared laundry facilities but never indicate whether payment is required to use them. In the absence of terms like 'coin-op', 'card-operated', 'paid laundry', or 'laundry fee', there is no evidence that the community laundry is paid.
Listings clearly confirm the presence of community laundry but only refer to it as being on-site or in two facilities/areas. There are no phrases like 'laundry on each floor' or 'laundry room on every floor', so there is no evidence it exists on every floor.
Parking is supported by many of the current listing remarks: 11 remarks explicitly mention rentable, leased, assigned, or waitlist-based stalls/garage parking, while only some units note no deeded parking. Even though current MLS parking_features is mostly marked NONE, the remarks consistently show the building offers parking access through the association or nearby garage, which is a building-level amenity buyers would search for.
Several listings describe parking as available through the Association on a waitlist or application basis, and one specifically mentions 'assigned parking has a waitlist.' The wording is fairly consistent across agents, which supports that the building offers assigned/reserved stalls for some residents. This appears to be a building-level parking option rather than deeded parking.
A handful of listings mention garage-based parking, including 'parking could be available to rent in the garage adjacent to property' and 'Oahuan Tower garage next door,' with one agent also calling it 'secured parking.' The evidence is not as strong as for assignment, but it consistently points to covered/garage parking being available for the building.
Multiple listings confirm that parking is not owned with or included in the unit deed. Parking is instead rented, subject to availability or a waitlist.
No analysis available
The repeatedly reported Association parking fee is $120 per month, and parking is not included with the units. One listing gives a conflicting amount of $125 per month, so $120 is retained based on the greater number of consistent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building uses a waitlist system for assigned or Association parking. Listings indicate that availability is not guaranteed and one recent listing reported an approximately five-month wait.
No analysis available
Reviewed all remarks for phrases like key card access, fob access, card reader, electronic access, and keycard entry. Aside from a reference to 'secured parking' (which does not necessarily imply card/fob access), there is no explicit evidence of a card/fob access security system, so this feature is set to false by default.
No analysis available
Searched the remarks for indications of security patrols, such as 'security patrol', 'roving security', or 'patrolled building', and found none. In the absence of any direct reference to a patrol service, this feature is assumed not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the provided public remarks explicitly states "concrete construction" or "reinforced concrete." However, 11 of 16 current MLS listings identify the construction material as CONCRE, making concrete the dominant building-level description despite the lack of remark confirmation.
No analysis available
Hollow tile appears only in a minority of current MLS records (4 of 14), and there are no public remarks explicitly referencing hollow tile construction. Because the remarks consistently describe the property as Old Hawaiiana with lava rock and wood-louver character instead, hollow tile looks more like occasional MLS checkbox noise than a verified building-wide feature. Confidence is limited because there is still some MLS presence, but the public evidence does not corroborate it.
No listing explicitly uses the phrase "masonry and stucco" or directly mentions stucco. Nevertheless, 9 of 16 current MLS records identify MASSTU, while multiple independent remarks reference "lava rock exterior" or "lava rock walls," providing consistent support for masonry-related construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The complex is repeatedly described as a 'low-rise' and 'walk-up' building with 'ground-level' units, consistent with typical above-ground low-rise construction in this area, and 2/10 MLS records explicitly include ABOGRO for construction_materials.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks mention investors, rental income, and long-term ownership opportunities but do not state that short-term rentals, vacation rentals, NUCs, TVUs, or other legal STR uses are permitted. No explicit prohibition such as a 30-day minimum or owner-occupant-only rule was found either, so STR permission cannot be confirmed from the public remarks.
References to a pool consistently concern a resident amenity rather than a hotel rental pool. No hotel rental program, hotel management arrangement, or rental-pool participation was found; STR is also not established.
The listings contain no evidence of a hotel rental pool, much less a mandatory one. Since STR permission and hotel-pool participation are not established, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings identify the property as fee simple rather than leasehold. No four-digit lease expiration or lease renewal year was found, so the lease expiry value is null.
The remarks were searched for explicit VA financing language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," or "VA loans accepted." None was found, so there is no public-remarks evidence that the building is VA approved.
The remarks were searched for fully insured, full insurance, comprehensive building insurance, walls-in coverage, and equivalent language. No insurance coverage statement was found in the public remarks.
No public remarks in the provided listings mention fire sprinklers, sprinkler systems, or fire suppression. The only signal is a single MLS amenities checkbox out of 13 listings, which is weak and inconsistent with the repeated copy/paste-style remarks seen across the listings. This should be treated as not verified for the building.
The remarks were searched for fire/life safety evaluation passage, FLSE approval, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, and passed fire inspection. None of these statements were found, so there is no public-remarks evidence that the building has passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the remarks reference 'city', 'urban', or 'downtown' views; instead they emphasize pool, grounds, and interior courtyard aspects, and MLS records show 0/10 CITY view codes with some units marked as having no view.
No analysis available
Garden-style views and landscaped surroundings are strongly supported across the listings: 14 of 16 MLS records identify GARDEN views, while 3 identify NONE. Multiple independent remarks describe lush tropical landscaping, a courtyard centered on a pool, mature landscaping, gardens, and greenery, indicating this is a genuine building feature rather than isolated copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing mentions sunset or west-facing views across many units, and one specifically notes a 'beautiful sunrise' instead; MLS view_descriptions show 0/10 with SUNSET and some units explicitly list view as NONE, suggesting the building is not marketed for sunset vistas.
No analysis available
The remarks highlight pool views, grounds, and sunrise but do not mention any fireworks views. This suggests that fireworks views are not a notable feature of this building.
No analysis available
Zero of the 16 provided listings mention a resident manager or on-site management. Although RESMAN is checked in 2/16 MLS records, the lack of any supporting remarks and the otherwise absent historical evidence make this too weak to include as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.