Oahuan Ltd
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Oahuan Ltd
Building Overview
Oahuan Ltd in Makiki-Tantalus (built 1956) features a pool; parking available. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Oahuan Ltd
Oahuan Ltd is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records the building was built in 1956. Size (unit count/square footage) and construction type are not specified in the MLS-provided data.
Key features include a shared pool for resident use. Parking is listed as available. Pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are prohibited, per the MLS information provided.
Management company information is unknown in the MLS data. Buyers should verify parking arrangements, any association fees, management details, and policy enforcement directly with the seller or managing agent, as this summary is based solely on MLS data and may be incomplete.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
There is no information in the provided remarks about the percentage of owner-occupied units. Because no current numeric value is available and remarks contain no owner-occupancy details, the value is unknown (null) with low confidence.
Several listings explicitly call units 'ground-level' or 'walk-up' indicating the building lacks elevators. I searched remarks for explicit elevator counts ('elevator', 'four elevators', '4 elevators') and found consistent language implying no elevators, so I retain the current value of 0 with high confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Multiple public remarks explicitly state 'cable' or 'cable TV included' (e.g., 'all utilities, cable, and internet included'). The MLS currently flags CABTV on 4 of 12 listings, and the language appears across listings from different agents rather than a single isolated line — evidence supports including cable as a building-level included fee.
High-confidence evidence: 9 of 12 MLS records list OTCOEX and many public remarks explicitly state 'common area maintenance' or 'common area upkeep' are included (phrases like 'common area maintenance' and 'common area expenses' appear across listings). This is consistent across multiple agent remarks and prior high-confidence data.
No analysis available
Very strong and consistent evidence: all 12 MLS listings indicate electricity (ELECTR) is included, and multiple public remarks explicitly state 'electricity included' or 'maintenance fee includes electricity'. This is corroborated across many agent remarks and prior high-confidence data.
No analysis available
Strong evidence that hot water is included building-wide: 10 of 12 MLS records list HOTWAT and several public remarks explicitly say 'hot water included' or include hot water among the maintenance-fee inclusions. A single listing noting WTRHTR suggests at least one unit may have its own heater, but the preponderance of MLS flags and agent remarks supports including hot water.
Strong, consistent evidence: 11 of 12 MLS listings list internet service (INTSER) and many public remarks explicitly state 'internet included' or 'internet service' is part of the maintenance fee. Multiple agents mention this across listings, supporting inclusion.
No analysis available
Very strong evidence: all 12 MLS records list SEWER as included and multiple public remarks explicitly state 'sewer included' among the maintenance fee inclusions. Consistent across listings and agents, supporting a high-confidence inclusion.
All 11 listings include water in association_fee_includes and multiple public remarks explicitly state 'water included' as part of the maintenance fee. The consistent language across listings and MLS checkboxes indicates water is included in the building's maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple unit remarks explicitly reference outdoor spaces: at least several listings state "The lanai allows for letting in the fresh natural air and outdoor living," "private balcony," or "lanai overlooking the pool." Historical MLS checkbox data also indicated PATDEC/COVPAT in some listings. Evidence is consistent across different listings/agents, so the building is considered to offer patio/deck amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All provided public remarks were reviewed for terms like surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or combined bike and surfboard storage and none were present. The remarks focus on the pool, community laundry, utilities, parking options, and location amenities but do not reference any surfboard-specific storage. Given this lack of evidence, it is moderately likely that the building does not offer dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 12 current MLS listings have the POOL amenity checked and historical review showed strong consistent evidence. Multiple remarks explicitly reference a pool (quotes include "community swimming pool offers a refreshing retreat", "refreshing pool on premises", and "well-kept pool"), indicating the building offers a shared swimming pool across listings rather than a single erroneous checkbox.
No analysis available
All provided listings describe the presence and condition of the pool but none indicate that it is a saltwater or saline system. I searched for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'salt pool', and 'saline' and found no mentions, so the pool is assumed not to be saltwater based on available information.
No analysis available
Highly consistent evidence: MLS amenities historically list community laundry for the building (COMLAU on all current listings), and multiple agent remarks explicitly state on-site/shared laundry (examples: "community laundry right downstairs", "Community laundry is located on-site", "two community laundry areas"). This feature is repeatedly mentioned across different listings and appears to be a genuine building-level amenity rather than an isolated copy/paste error.
The public remarks confirm shared laundry facilities but never indicate whether payment is required to use them. In the absence of terms like 'coin-op', 'card-operated', 'paid laundry', or 'laundry fee', there is no evidence that the community laundry is paid.
Listings clearly confirm the presence of community laundry but only refer to it as being on-site or in two facilities/areas. There are no phrases like 'laundry on each floor' or 'laundry room on every floor', so there is no evidence it exists on every floor.
Multiple listings (at least 6–8 of the 12 remarks) explicitly state building-related parking is available on a rental/assignment basis, e.g., 'Parking: Available through application at $120/month', 'Association leases out stalls for $120/month', and 'parking could be available to rent in the garage adjacent to property.' Although many units lack deeded stalls, the repeated references to rentable/assigned stalls and a waitlist across different listings indicate the building does offer parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several remarks explicitly deny deeded/owned parking and state parking is not included with the unit. Set to false with high confidence.
No analysis available
Multiple listings describe rentable/leased parking stalls at $120 per month (first-come, first-served). Use $120/month as the monthly parking fee with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building manages parking via a waitlist and listings mention typical wait times (~5 months) and instructions to join the waitlist. Set to true with high confidence.
No analysis available
Reviewed all remarks for phrases like key card access, fob access, card reader, electronic access, and keycard entry. Aside from a reference to 'secured parking' (which does not necessarily imply card/fob access), there is no explicit evidence of a card/fob access security system, so this feature is set to false by default.
No analysis available
Searched the remarks for indications of security patrols, such as 'security patrol', 'roving security', or 'patrolled building', and found none. In the absence of any direct reference to a patrol service, this feature is assumed not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
CURRENT MLS shows 7/12 records checked for CONCRE, but none of the public remarks mention 'concrete', 'reinforced concrete', or similar. Multiple listings repeatedly describe 'lava rock accents' and 'lava rock exterior walls' and 'Old Hawaiiana' character; there is no explicit evidence of concrete construction across agents, suggesting the CONCRE checkbox may be erroneous.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historically the building was rated High confidence for masonry & stucco (majority of MLS records). In these public remarks multiple listings explicitly state 'lava rock exterior walls' and 'lava rock accents' and describe the building as 'Old Hawaiiana', which is consistent with masonry construction; 8/12 current MLS records also have MASSTU checked, and the remarks corroborate masonry presence across several agent entries.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The complex is repeatedly described as a 'low-rise' and 'walk-up' building with 'ground-level' units, consistent with typical above-ground low-rise construction in this area, and 2/10 MLS records explicitly include ABOGRO for construction_materials.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched public remarks for STR language and found none. In absence of explicit allowance and no current value provided, default to false with medium confidence.
No evidence of participation in a hotel rental pool in the remarks. Because STRs are not indicated as allowed, this is false with high confidence.
Listings do not reference any mandatory hotel pool or required participation. With no STR or hotel-pool program indicated, mandatory participation is false with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly describe the condo as fee simple, so this is not a leasehold property. Because the property is fee simple, a lease expiry year is not applicable.
Searched the public remarks for explicit VA loan language (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA financing', 'VA loans accepted') and found no references. With no evidence in the listings, set to false with medium confidence.
The public remarks do not state that the HOA provides full (walls-in) insurance. In absence of any mention, I report false with medium-low confidence.
No analysis available
There is no public-remarks evidence that the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation. Because there is no mention and no prior affirmative value, I return false with medium-low confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the remarks reference 'city', 'urban', or 'downtown' views; instead they emphasize pool, grounds, and interior courtyard aspects, and MLS records show 0/10 CITY view codes with some units marked as having no view.
No analysis available
At least 6 separate listing remarks reference greenery, landscaping, pool/grounds, or lanais overlooking those areas—examples include "lush tropical landscaping," "lanai overlooking the pool and grounds," and "very usable lanai overlooking the swimming pool." Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and matches prior high-confidence data, so the building offers garden/courtyard views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing mentions sunset or west-facing views across many units, and one specifically notes a 'beautiful sunrise' instead; MLS view_descriptions show 0/10 with SUNSET and some units explicitly list view as NONE, suggesting the building is not marketed for sunset vistas.
No analysis available
The remarks highlight pool views, grounds, and sunrise but do not mention any fireworks views. This suggests that fireworks views are not a notable feature of this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.