Oahuan Ltd
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Oahuan Ltd
Building Overview
Oahuan Ltd in Makiki-Tantalus (built 1956) features a pool; parking available. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Oahuan Ltd
Oahuan Ltd is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records the building was built in 1956. Size (unit count/square footage) and construction type are not specified in the MLS-provided data.
Key features include a shared pool for resident use. Parking is listed as available. Pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are prohibited, per the MLS information provided.
Management company information is unknown in the MLS data. Buyers should verify parking arrangements, any association fees, management details, and policy enforcement directly with the seller or managing agent, as this summary is based solely on MLS data and may be incomplete.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy indicators like a percentage, 'majority owner occupied,' or similar phrasing, but found none. The remarks discuss unit condition, amenities, and location, not the ownership mix of the building, so this remains unknown.
The public remarks consistently indicate a walk-up building rather than an elevator-served property. I searched for explicit elevator references such as "elevator," "multiple elevators," or similar phrasing and found none. The current value of 0 is strongly supported.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable service appears to be included in at least some units, with several remarks directly mentioning cable and one noting maintenance fees include 'all utilities, cable, and internet included.' The evidence is not universal across all listings, so this is a building-level feature available in some listings rather than every unit.
There is strong building-level evidence that common area electricity/operations are included. MLS support is broad (11/14 listings), and multiple remarks mention common area maintenance/upkeep, suggesting this is not a one-off agent checkbox but a consistent association expense inclusion.
No analysis available
Electricity inclusion is extremely consistent across the building. Every current MLS record includes ELECTR, and the remarks repeatedly confirm it with phrases like 'includes electricity' and 'maintenance fee includes ELECTRICITY,' indicating very high confidence.
No analysis available
Hot water appears to be included at the building level. The remarks repeatedly confirm it, and the MLS data is strongly aligned with HOTWAT on most records (11/13), with only one WTRHTR indicator that does not overturn the overall pattern.
Internet is strongly supported at the building level. The MLS is nearly universal and the remarks repeatedly say 'internet included' or 'internet service' is part of the fee, showing consistent support across multiple listings and agents.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is one of the clearest features in the dataset. All current MLS listings show SEWER, and the public remarks consistently confirm it, making this a very high-confidence building-level feature.
Water inclusion is strongly supported across the building. The MLS data is nearly universal, and multiple remarks directly say 'water included' alongside electricity, sewer, and internet, which suggests consistent association coverage rather than isolated copy-paste errors.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports patio/deck access in the building. At least several listings reference a "lanai," "private balcony," or "spacious lanai to enjoy outdoor meals," which indicates usable outdoor space is available in some units. This is consistent across multiple remarks and does not look like a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no supporting evidence in the remarks for private yard space. Across the listings, agents describe lanais, balconies, pool views, and common landscaping, but not private or enclosed yards; the lone MLS checkbox appears unsupported by the text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All provided public remarks were reviewed for terms like surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or combined bike and surfboard storage and none were present. The remarks focus on the pool, community laundry, utilities, parking options, and location amenities but do not reference any surfboard-specific storage. Given this lack of evidence, it is moderately likely that the building does not offer dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported for this building. Numerous listings mention it directly, including phrases like 'community swimming pool,' 'refreshing pool on premises,' 'sparkling pool on premises,' and 'very well-maintained pool,' spread across multiple remarks rather than a single copied description. This aligns with the current MLS amenities data, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
All provided listings describe the presence and condition of the pool but none indicate that it is a saltwater or saline system. I searched for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'salt pool', and 'saline' and found no mentions, so the pool is assumed not to be saltwater based on available information.
No analysis available
Community laundry is strongly supported across the listings and appears to be a stable building feature, not a one-off agent copy-paste error. All 14/14 MLS entries include COMLAU, and multiple independent remarks explicitly mention "community laundry," "on-site laundry," "laundry right downstairs," and "two Community laundry areas with clotheslines."
The public remarks confirm shared laundry facilities but never indicate whether payment is required to use them. In the absence of terms like 'coin-op', 'card-operated', 'paid laundry', or 'laundry fee', there is no evidence that the community laundry is paid.
Listings clearly confirm the presence of community laundry but only refer to it as being on-site or in two facilities/areas. There are no phrases like 'laundry on each floor' or 'laundry room on every floor', so there is no evidence it exists on every floor.
Parking is supported by many of the current listing remarks: 11 remarks explicitly mention rentable, leased, assigned, or waitlist-based stalls/garage parking, while only some units note no deeded parking. Even though current MLS parking_features is mostly marked NONE, the remarks consistently show the building offers parking access through the association or nearby garage, which is a building-level amenity buyers would search for.
Several listings describe parking as available through the Association on a waitlist or application basis, and one specifically mentions 'assigned parking has a waitlist.' The wording is fairly consistent across agents, which supports that the building offers assigned/reserved stalls for some residents. This appears to be a building-level parking option rather than deeded parking.
A handful of listings mention garage-based parking, including 'parking could be available to rent in the garage adjacent to property' and 'Oahuan Tower garage next door,' with one agent also calling it 'secured parking.' The evidence is not as strong as for assignment, but it consistently points to covered/garage parking being available for the building.
The listings directly deny deeded parking and consistently describe stalls as rented from the association or available by application/waitlist. That indicates parking is not deeded with the unit.
No analysis available
Several listings give the monthly parking charge as $120, with no conflicting amount in the remarks. This is the clearest parking fee extracted from the public comments.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks repeatedly describe parking as waitlist-based, including first-come, first-served language and explicit waitlist references. This strongly supports that the building uses a parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
Reviewed all remarks for phrases like key card access, fob access, card reader, electronic access, and keycard entry. Aside from a reference to 'secured parking' (which does not necessarily imply card/fob access), there is no explicit evidence of a card/fob access security system, so this feature is set to false by default.
No analysis available
Searched the remarks for indications of security patrols, such as 'security patrol', 'roving security', or 'patrolled building', and found none. In the absence of any direct reference to a patrol service, this feature is assumed not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears to be the dominant MLS description for this building, with 9 of 14 current listings marked CONCRE. None of the public remarks explicitly mention concrete or reinforced concrete, so this is driven primarily by the repeated MLS material field rather than agent commentary. The consistency across listings suggests a building-level characteristic rather than a one-off unit description.
No analysis available
Hollow tile appears only in a minority of current MLS records (4 of 14), and there are no public remarks explicitly referencing hollow tile construction. Because the remarks consistently describe the property as Old Hawaiiana with lava rock and wood-louver character instead, hollow tile looks more like occasional MLS checkbox noise than a verified building-wide feature. Confidence is limited because there is still some MLS presence, but the public evidence does not corroborate it.
Historically the building was rated High confidence for masonry & stucco (majority of MLS records). In these public remarks multiple listings explicitly state 'lava rock exterior walls' and 'lava rock accents' and describe the building as 'Old Hawaiiana', which is consistent with masonry construction; 8/12 current MLS records also have MASSTU checked, and the remarks corroborate masonry presence across several agent entries.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The complex is repeatedly described as a 'low-rise' and 'walk-up' building with 'ground-level' units, consistent with typical above-ground low-rise construction in this area, and 2/10 MLS records explicitly include ABOGRO for construction_materials.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for STR clues such as short-term rental allowed, legal vacation rental language, NUC, TVU, or minimum-stay rules and found none. With no public evidence that STR is permitted, this is set to false.
I looked for hotel rental pool language such as hotel-managed units, branded rental programs, or pool participation references and found none. Because short-term rental allowance is not evidenced in the remarks, this must be false.
I searched for wording like mandatory pool, required participation, cannot opt out, or must rent through the hotel program and found nothing. Since there is no evidence of STR/hotel-pool use in the remarks, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for land lease language like "lease expires," "ground lease ends," "leasehold expiring," or a renewal year, but found nothing. Since no specific expiration year appears in the public remarks, the expiry date remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for explicit VA financing language such as "VA approved," "VA loans accepted," or similar terms and found none. With no public remark evidence, this is treated as not confirmed.
I looked for HOA insurance wording that would indicate the building is fully insured or provides walls-in coverage, but none of the listings mention it. Because the remarks are silent on insurance coverage, this is not confirmed.
No public remarks in the provided listings mention fire sprinklers, sprinkler systems, or fire suppression. The only signal is a single MLS amenities checkbox out of 13 listings, which is weak and inconsistent with the repeated copy/paste-style remarks seen across the listings. This should be treated as not verified for the building.
I searched all public remarks for explicit fire/life safety approval language, but found nothing indicating the building has passed FLSE or a fire inspection. With no direct evidence in the remarks, this remains unconfirmed and is set to false at low confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the remarks reference 'city', 'urban', or 'downtown' views; instead they emphasize pool, grounds, and interior courtyard aspects, and MLS records show 0/10 CITY view codes with some units marked as having no view.
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports garden-style views at The Oahuan. Across the current listings, 12 of 14 have GARDEN in MLS view_descriptions, and multiple remarks independently reference "lush tropical landscaping," "greenery," and views "overlooking the pool and grounds." This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste issue.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing mentions sunset or west-facing views across many units, and one specifically notes a 'beautiful sunrise' instead; MLS view_descriptions show 0/10 with SUNSET and some units explicitly list view as NONE, suggesting the building is not marketed for sunset vistas.
No analysis available
The remarks highlight pool views, grounds, and sunrise but do not mention any fireworks views. This suggests that fireworks views are not a notable feature of this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.