Oahu Surf 2

The MLS property data for all four listings unanimously lists the building’s construction year as 1971. With no remarks indicating a different build or full reconstruction date, 1971 is highly reliable as the year built.

Across four listings, the highest observed unit floor is 12, indicating the building is at least 12 stories tall. No public remarks mention a higher floor count, and the building’s rooftop pool is typical of a 12-story Waikiki midrise, so 12 floors is the best-supported estimate.

No listing remarks state the total number of units in the building, and the NumberOfUnitsTotal MLS field is reported as zero for all listings, which is clearly non-informative. As a result, the building’s unit count remains unknown from the available data.

I searched the remarks for explicit owner-occupancy statements (e.g., '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied', 'owner occupied') and found none. Per the rules, with no mention I kept the existing owner_occupancy value of 52.00% with low confidence.

I searched the remarks for phrases like 'elevator', 'elevators', 'four elevators', or 'multiple elevators' and found no references. Because there is no confirming or contradicting information, I retained the current value of 2 elevators with low confidence.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

One listing notes “AC is allowed in this unit,” indicating individually installed AC rather than a building-supplied central system. With no ACCEN box checked and no mention of central AC being included, maintenance fees almost certainly do not include central AC.

One of six current listings checks CABTV in the association_fee_includes. None of the public remarks mention 'cable' or 'cable TV included', and historical notes warn of copy/paste. The evidence for cable being included is weak (1/6 MLS checks), so this is marked true with moderate confidence.

Four of six listings mark common area electricity in the HOA fee (OTCOEX). No public remark explicitly states 'common area electricity', so the indication comes mainly from MLS checkboxes and appears potentially copy/pasted; included with moderate confidence.

No listing marks co-op taxes as included and the building is marketed as a condo (not a cooperative). This strongly indicates there are no co-op taxes included in the maintenance fees.

All six current listings mark electricity as included, and one listing's public remarks explicitly says 'Maintenance fees include electricity!'. Multiple agents have the MLS checkbox checked and remarks corroborate, giving strong evidence that electricity is included in the HOA fee.

Across 4 listings, the GAS field is never selected and there is no mention of gas utilities in the remarks. This strongly suggests gas is not included in the maintenance fees (and likely not provided by the building).

Five of six listings check HOTWAT as included, but one listing lists a water heater (WTRHTR), which can indicate unit-supplied hot water. No public remarks mention hot water being included, so HOTWAT is retained based on MLS data but with moderate confidence due to the conflicting WTRHTR entry.

No listing checks the internet-service-included field, and there are no phrases like “internet included” or “Wi-Fi included in HOA” in the remarks. This pattern indicates internet is not included in the maintenance fees.

The building is described as being by the Ala Wai Canal but not as having marina facilities or boat slips. With 0/4 marina checkboxes and no textual references, marina-related costs are almost certainly not included in the maintenance fees.

Every current listing (6/6) marks sewer as included in HOA fees. Historical data showed high confidence and there are no public remarks contradicting this, so sewer-included is considered a reliable building-level feature.

All six current listings indicate water is included in the HOA fees. This consistent and repeated MLS checkbox evidence, aligned with historically high confidence for Waikiki condos, supports marking water as included with high confidence.

No listing remarks mention BBQ or grilling areas and agents consistently do not mark BBQ in the amenities. This indicates the building likely does not have BBQ facilities.

Across 4 listings, there are no mentions of bike storage, bike room, or bike racks in the building, and MLS amenities never flag bike storage. The sole bike reference is to nearby Biki bike-share, which is off-site, so current evidence indicates the building does not provide its own dedicated bicycle storage.

Despite the canal-side location, no listing advertises boating or docking facilities. This suggests the building does not provide a boat dock or marina access.

Parking is mentioned (secured and tandem), but no listing describes a car wash facility. This suggests the building does not provide a car wash amenity.

No listing describes or checks a clubhouse amenity. This is strong evidence that the building does not have a clubhouse.

The remarks market location, pool, parking, and layouts but never mention any concierge or front desk service. With all MLS entries also leaving concierge-related amenities unchecked, the building almost certainly does not offer concierge services.

There are no references to pet or dog exercise facilities in remarks, and the MLS amenities never indicate such a feature. This strongly suggests there is no dog park in the building.

None of the listings reference a doorman or lobby attendant, and the MLS amenity is consistently unchecked. This makes it very likely the building does not provide a doorman service.

Across 4 listings, there is no mention of a gym or fitness center and the MLS amenity for EXEROO is never selected. This strongly suggests the building does not offer an exercise room.

The property is presented as a standard Waikiki condo without high-end chauffeur or house-car services. The absence of any such mention strongly indicates no limo or car service is offered.

Agents do not advertise or select a meeting room amenity and remarks focus strictly on residential and pool features. This indicates there is no dedicated meeting room.

Every listing mentions significant outdoor space such as a 'private lanai', 'huge wrap around private lanai', 'patio running around the outside of unit', or 'large lanai'. This, plus consistent MLS patio/deck flags, indicates the building offers patio/deck amenities for its units.

While the location is walkable to Waikiki and Ala Moana, no listing describes dedicated jogging or walking paths on-site. This supports that there is no formal jogging path amenity.

The building is marketed mainly for adult/urban use with pool and lanai features; playground-related terms never appear. This indicates the building does not offer a children's playground.

Across all remarks, outdoor space is described only as lanais/patios, never as a yard or fenced/private yard. Given the high-rise configuration and 0/4 MLS PRIYAR flags, it is very unlikely the building offers private yard areas.

Neither MLS data nor remarks suggest any putting green or golf practice area. It is almost certain the building has no putting green.

While there is a rooftop pool, no listing calls it a recreation or amenity deck and most agents leave RECARE unchecked. This points to the absence of a distinct, advertised recreation area beyond the pool itself.

Agents do not mark a recreation room amenity and remarks focus on the pool and lanais only. This suggests the building lacks a dedicated recreation room.

Listings emphasize proximity to Waikiki restaurants but never state an in-building restaurant or café. MLS amenities also omit RESTAU, indicating there is no on-site restaurant.

Remarks state 'Take a dip in the sparkling rooftop pool' and 'The building features a roof top pool with views in all directions', and another says 'take a stroll up to the rooftop pool'. This provides clear, repeated evidence that the building has rooftop amenities.

Listings highlight the rooftop pool but omit any reference to a sauna or steam facility. This indicates the building does not have a sauna.

Moderate evidence the building offers storage/lockers: 2 of 6 current MLS listings include storage-related amenities and 2 of 6 include storage in unit features, and one public remark explicitly says 'extra storage!'. The mentions are present across multiple listings/agents but limited in number, so confidence is moderate (implied rather than repeatedly described in remarks).

Searched for 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', and related terms; none found. Although 'extra storage' is noted for the unit, there is no explicit evidence of dedicated surfboard storage.

There are no references to tennis courts in any remarks and MLS data shows no agents selecting TENCOU. Given the small Waikiki condo context, the building almost certainly has no tennis court.

Most MLS entries (5/6) list TRACHU in the amenities, indicating a building trash/garbage chute. None of the current public remarks explicitly mention removal or absence of a chute, and multiple agents consistently selected the TRACHU amenity. While public remarks do not call out the chute, the consistent historical MLS selections from several listings provide strong evidence the building has a trash chute.

The remarks reference '2 secured parking', '1 covered, secured parking', and a 'tandem parking stall' but never valet or valet parking. This consistent description across listings strongly suggests there is no valet service at the building.

Three listings do not mark any gated or walled feature and none of the remarks describe the property as gated or fenced. The lone gated/wall/fence checkbox without supporting remarks appears inconsistent, so the building is unlikely to have a notable perimeter wall or gated enclosure.

Descriptions focus on a rooftop pool with views and do not reference any separate hot tub or spa feature. This supports that there is no whirlpool amenity.

Strong evidence the building has a shared pool: multiple current public remarks (at least 4–5 of the listings) explicitly reference a rooftop or sparkling pool, using phrases like "sparkling rooftop pool," "roof top pool," and "inviting pool with huge views." Historical MLS checkbox data also showed all listings reporting pool amenities, so the pool presence is well-supported across agents and listings.

Across four separate listings, the pool is described multiple times but never as heated, and no heated-pool options are selected in MLS. This consistent omission strongly suggests the building’s rooftop pool is not heated.

Searched for 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'salt pool' and found no mentions. Pool exists (building context), but no evidence it is saltwater.

Strong evidence that some units have in-unit laundry: multiple listings (at least 3 distinct remarks) explicitly state "Washer & dryer in unit" or "full size stacked front-loading washer and dryer." Historical MLS checkbox data also shows 6/6 listings include washer/dryer, and multiple agents repeat the feature (consistent, not a single isolated claim). Buyers searching for units with in-unit laundry should consider this building.

None of the four listings mention shared or community laundry (e.g., laundry room, coin laundry), and all 4/4 MLS entries omit the community laundry amenity. Given that building-level amenities are typically marked consistently when present, this provides strong evidence that there is no community laundry in the building. Therefore, the feature is set to false with high confidence.

Searched for 'coin laundry', 'coin-op', 'card operated', 'paid laundry', 'quarters' and found no references. Remarks instead reference in-unit laundry, providing no evidence of paid community laundry.

Searched remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'floor-by-floor laundry' and found none. Multiple remarks explicitly state washer/dryer are in-unit, indicating no evidence of community laundry on every floor.

Every listing for this building includes at least one parking stall in MLS parking_features, and the remarks reference stalls with the units (e.g., '2 secured parking', '1 tandem parking stall'). This strongly indicates the building offers on-site parking for its units.

MLS data shows assigned parking checked on 2 out of 4 listings, suggesting stalls are individually designated even though remarks do not use the term 'assigned'. In Waikiki condo buildings, deeded or reserved stalls are standard, so it's likely stalls here are assigned.

All 6 listings in the current MLS indicate covered parking and several remarks explicitly mention covered/assigned stalls—quotes include 'one assigned covered parking stall #12' and '1 covered, secured parking'. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent listings and matches historical high-confidence data, so covered parking is strongly supported.

Searched for explicit language like 'deeded parking' or 'parking included in deed' but found none. The remarks do indicate assigned/covered/secured parking stalls, which suggests assigned parking but not deeded ownership.

There is no mention of EV charging in any remarks and no EVCHRG checkbox used in MLS for any listing. Given the complete absence of references, the building likely does not offer dedicated EV charging stations.

Looked for phrases such as 'parking $X/month', 'monthly parking fee', or 'additional parking cost' and found no references. Unknown whether any separate parking fee exists based on these remarks.

Neither MLS data nor remarks mention guest or visitor parking. This consistent absence across all listings suggests the building does not provide dedicated guest parking stalls.

At least 2 of the 6 listings and the MLS checkboxes reference secured parking—key phrases include '2 secured parking in the heart of Waikiki' and '1 covered, secured parking'. While not every listing mentions it, consistent references and MLS flags across listings indicate the building offers secured-entry parking for some stalls.

Tandem parking is clearly identified in both MLS checkboxes and the remarks ('1 tandem parking stall'). This shows that at least some units in the building include tandem-style parking stalls.

No listing references valet service or attended parking, and the VALET option is never selected in MLS data. This strongly suggests the building does not offer valet parking.

Searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or similar terms and found none. Remarks only reference assigned/covered stalls for this unit, with no indication of a building waitlist system.

Elevator security is never mentioned in remarks and is not reflected in the amenity checkboxes in any listing. This consistent absence indicates the building does not use keyed or fob-access elevators as a notable feature.

Searched for 'card access', 'fob', 'key card', and similar terms; none found. 'Secured parking' appears but there's no evidence of a card/fob building access system.

Across 4 listings, there are no references to a security guard or on-site security staff. Given the repeated omission in both amenities and remarks, it's highly likely the building does not offer a staffed security guard service.

Searched remarks for 'security patrol', 'roving security', and related phrases and found no references. No evidence in public remarks of a security patrol service.

The listings describe multiple building amenities but never mention video surveillance or security cameras, and agents are not checking any related amenity fields. This strongly suggests the building does not have a formal video security system advertised to buyers.

Across 4 listings, no remarks mention central air or HVAC, and 0/4 MLS entries check any central AC fields. One agent says 'AC is allowed in this unit,' suggesting cooling is not centrally provided. Together this strongly indicates the building does not have central AC.

None of the 4 listings check the split AC field or describe mini-split/ductless systems in the remarks. Agents instead talk about trade winds and AC being merely 'allowed,' not an installed split system. This pattern suggests the building is not characterized by split AC in its units.

MLS data shows 1/4 listings with the window AC inclusion checked, and none of the remarks conflict with this. An agent’s note that 'AC is allowed in this unit' aligns with individual window units rather than a central system. This supports that at least some units in the building have window AC.

All six current MLS entries (6/6) mark the building as concrete (MLS construction_materials = 'CONCRE'). Public remarks do not mention building materials or any recent reconstruction that would contradict concrete construction. Because historical confidence was High and there is no opposing evidence in the remarks, the building is reported as concrete with high confidence.

Listings do not identify any double-wall construction, instead emphasizing concrete as the primary material. The absence of double-wall indicators across all MLS entries strongly suggests it is not categorized as double-wall construction.

Across all available listings, hollow tile construction is never mentioned or selected in MLS. This consistent omission strongly indicates the building is not identified as hollow-tile construction.

At least one listing explicitly flags masonry/stucco construction in MLS, and none contradict it. Although other agents did not check this box, such omissions are common, so there is moderate evidence the structure incorporates masonry/stucco finishes along with concrete.

MLS data never identifies the building as steel frame, while consistently identifying concrete construction. In the absence of any remark-based evidence of steel framing, it is very likely not classified as a steel-frame building in MLS terms.

No listing identifies a slab foundation in the MLS data or remarks. While many concrete buildings may sit on slabs, the consistent non-selection of the SLAB field suggests the building is not classified under this specific MLS construction category.

No analysis available

Across all listings, agents consistently select concrete construction and never select wood frame. For a Waikiki condo tower of this type, that strongly indicates the building is not wood-frame construction. No remarks reference any wood-frame elements.

At least one agent explicitly notes above-ground construction in MLS, and none contradict it. Given the building’s multi-story condo form, it is reasonable to treat above-ground construction as present despite inconsistent checkbox use.

No listing suggests any brick construction, and the MLS checkbox for brick is never used for this building. Given the building type and location, brick construction would be unusual and likely highlighted, so it is very likely not a brick building.

No MLS entry or remark references single-wall construction, and the building type is inconsistent with that method. This strongly indicates the building is not single-wall construction.

Searched for explicit short-term rental language (STR, vacation rental allowed, NUC, TVU, etc.) and found none. Mentions of 'vacation home' and 'rental potential' do not constitute explicit permission for STRs, so STR allowed is set to false based on the remarks.

Looked for phrases like 'hotel rental pool', 'part of hotel operations', or references to a specific hotel managing rentals; none were found. Because STR is not indicated as allowed, hotel pool participation is set false.

Searched remarks for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or any language indicating mandatory rental program and found none. Since STR is not indicated, mandatory pool is false.

No listing remarks refer to fee simple ownership or land being included, and the MLS tenure flags show 0 of 4 as Fee Simple. Because the same MLS summary also shows 0 of 4 as Leasehold, the tenure situation cannot be determined confidently from available data.

None of the public remarks mention leasehold status, lease rent, or expiration dates, and the summarized MLS data shows 0 of 4 listings as Leasehold. With land tenure fields not clearly indicating either FS or LH, the presence of leasehold units remains uncertain.

I searched the remarks for any reference to a land lease, ground lease, or lease expiry year (e.g., 'lease expires 2050', 'ground lease ends') and found no such information. Return null because no expiration year is provided.

Searched the remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. No evidence in the public remarks to indicate VA loan approval.

I searched for terms such as 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', 'full insurance', or 'HOA fully insured' and found no such statements. The remarks do state 'Building now has 100% Hurricane insurance!' which I quoted, but that does not constitute explicit confirmation of HOA walls-in/full building insurance, so I did not mark insured_fully as true.

No listing remarks reference fire sprinklers or a sprinkler system, and none of the four MLS records have the fire-sprinkler amenity flagged. Given the lack of direct evidence either way, the presence or absence of a building-wide sprinkler system is unknown.

I searched the remarks for explicit language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation (e.g., 'FLSE passed', 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'passed fire inspection') and found none. In the absence of any mention, I set this to false with medium confidence per the rules (absence likely means not stated publicly).

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

At least one unit remark says 'Ocean views from all over the apartment,' and rooftop pool comments describe wide Waikiki/South Shore vistas. This confirms the building offers ocean-view units and common-area ocean views.

1 of 6 listings explicitly mention mountain views, with a remark saying 'mountain views on the lanai.' Historical MLS data previously had high confidence for mountain views and current remarks from a listing confirm the feature, indicating some units in the building offer mountain views rather than being a copy-paste error.

Across four listings, agents highlight ocean, mountain, and broad Waikiki/South Shore views but never mention Diamond Head. Given the specificity of other view descriptions, Diamond Head views are unlikely to be a notable feature.

1 of 6 listings mention city/skyline views, including the phrase 'soaking in the skyline' and references to watching Friday night fireworks from the rooftop. Given prior high-confidence data and current remarks confirming skyline/city vistas, the building offers units with city views.

Listings speak of 'huge views of the whole S Shore and all of Waikiki' plus extensive ocean views. These descriptions strongly suggest visible stretches of shoreline/coastline from the building’s higher levels.

Agents emphasize urban and water views rather than garden or courtyard vistas. The absence of any 'garden' or similar view language suggests garden views are not a defining building feature.

Listings discuss ocean, mountain, skyline, canal, and broad Waikiki views but never reference a golf course. Given agents' tendency to highlight golf views when present, golf-course views are unlikely to be a notable feature.

1 of 6 listings explicitly references the building's location 'on the Ala Wai Canal' and rooftop views in all directions, supporting marina/harbor-type (canal) views. Combined with prior high-confidence MLS data, the evidence shows some units in the building offer canal/harbor views.

Across four listings, there are no mentions of sunrise or east-facing views, while other view types are described in detail. This indicates sunrise views are not a notable selling point for the building.

Remarks describe watching 'Friday night fireworks' from the rooftop pool, implying a west-facing orientation with evening/sunset vistas. This supports that the building offers sunset-type views from common areas and likely some units.

All remarks highlight proximity to beaches, canal, shopping, and Waikiki amenities with no reference to a cemetery. Given the location and silence on this point, cemetery views can be safely ruled out.

The public remarks explicitly state Friday night fireworks can be watched from the rooftop pool, confirming fireworks views from the building.

No analysis available

No analysis available

None of the remarks discuss whether pets are allowed or restricted. With no explicit 'pets allowed' or 'no pets' language and no MLS NOPET flags, the building’s pet policy cannot be confirmed and is treated as not verified/likely restricted for now.

Three out of four MLS listings list a resident manager in the building amenities (RESMAN), suggesting this is a standard building feature rather than an isolated error. Even though remarks don’t mention it, the repeated amenity flag across multiple listings provides strong evidence of an on-site resident manager.

The units are marketed simply as condos suitable as a primary residence, vacation home, or investment, without any mention of hotel management or programs. The absence of condotel-specific language across all listings and MLS supports that this is not a condotel building.

Remarks describe the property as 'a 699 sqft condo at Oahu Surf II' with no reference to co-op structures. Combined with the lack of any COOTAX or co-op indicators in MLS, this strongly indicates the building is not a cooperative.