Oahu Surf 2

The MLS property data for all four listings unanimously lists the building’s construction year as 1971. With no remarks indicating a different build or full reconstruction date, 1971 is highly reliable as the year built.

Across four listings, the highest observed unit floor is 12, indicating the building is at least 12 stories tall. No public remarks mention a higher floor count, and the building’s rooftop pool is typical of a 12-story Waikiki midrise, so 12 floors is the best-supported estimate.

No listing remarks state the total number of units in the building, and the NumberOfUnitsTotal MLS field is reported as zero for all listings, which is clearly non-informative. As a result, the building’s unit count remains unknown from the available data.

Retained the existing owner_occupancy value of 52.00 with low confidence because the remarks do not state owner-occupancy or similar language. Per rules, when a current numeric value exists and remarks are silent, we keep it and note lack of corroborating evidence.

Current value retained as 2 because no remarks reference elevators. Per rules, when a current numeric value exists and no remarks mention the field, we keep the current value with low confidence. I searched the remarks for various elevator terms and found nothing to confirm or contradict the count.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

One listing notes “AC is allowed in this unit,” indicating individually installed AC rather than a building-supplied central system. With no ACCEN box checked and no mention of central AC being included, maintenance fees almost certainly do not include central AC.

One of six current listings checks CABTV in the association_fee_includes. None of the public remarks mention 'cable' or 'cable TV included', and historical notes warn of copy/paste. The evidence for cable being included is weak (1/6 MLS checks), so this is marked true with moderate confidence.

MLS checkboxes indicate common area electricity is included in 5 of 7 current listings (OTCOEX). No public remark explicitly states 'common area electricity'; evidence is therefore implied and appears to come from MLS association_fee_includes entries across multiple agents rather than explicit agent remarks.

No listing marks co-op taxes as included and the building is marketed as a condo (not a cooperative). This strongly indicates there are no co-op taxes included in the maintenance fees.

All 7 current MLS listings mark electricity as included (ELECTR) and one public remark clearly states "Maintenance fees include electricity!", giving strong, cross-listing confirmation that electricity is included in the association fees.

Across 4 listings, the GAS field is never selected and there is no mention of gas utilities in the remarks. This strongly suggests gas is not included in the maintenance fees (and likely not provided by the building).

Six of 7 current MLS listings indicate hot water is included (HOTWAT). No public remarks explicitly mention 'hot water included', and one listing elsewhere lists WTRHTR (water heater), so the evidence is moderate and mainly driven by MLS checkboxes rather than explicit agent text.

No listing checks the internet-service-included field, and there are no phrases like “internet included” or “Wi-Fi included in HOA” in the remarks. This pattern indicates internet is not included in the maintenance fees.

The building is described as being by the Ala Wai Canal but not as having marina facilities or boat slips. With 0/4 marina checkboxes and no textual references, marina-related costs are almost certainly not included in the maintenance fees.

Every current listing (7/7) marks sewer as included (SEWER) and historical data showed High confidence. There are no public remarks contradicting this, so the evidence across multiple listings is strong that sewer is included in the association fees.

All 7 current MLS listings indicate water is included in the association fees (WATER). Historical data was High confidence and no public remarks contradict inclusion, so the combined MLS evidence supports a high-confidence conclusion that water is included.

No listing remarks mention BBQ or grilling areas and agents consistently do not mark BBQ in the amenities. This indicates the building likely does not have BBQ facilities.

Across 4 listings, there are no mentions of bike storage, bike room, or bike racks in the building, and MLS amenities never flag bike storage. The sole bike reference is to nearby Biki bike-share, which is off-site, so current evidence indicates the building does not provide its own dedicated bicycle storage.

Despite the canal-side location, no listing advertises boating or docking facilities. This suggests the building does not provide a boat dock or marina access.

Parking is mentioned (secured and tandem), but no listing describes a car wash facility. This suggests the building does not provide a car wash amenity.

No listing describes or checks a clubhouse amenity. This is strong evidence that the building does not have a clubhouse.

The remarks market location, pool, parking, and layouts but never mention any concierge or front desk service. With all MLS entries also leaving concierge-related amenities unchecked, the building almost certainly does not offer concierge services.

There are no references to pet or dog exercise facilities in remarks, and the MLS amenities never indicate such a feature. This strongly suggests there is no dog park in the building.

None of the listings reference a doorman or lobby attendant, and the MLS amenity is consistently unchecked. This makes it very likely the building does not provide a doorman service.

Across 4 listings, there is no mention of a gym or fitness center and the MLS amenity for EXEROO is never selected. This strongly suggests the building does not offer an exercise room.

The property is presented as a standard Waikiki condo without high-end chauffeur or house-car services. The absence of any such mention strongly indicates no limo or car service is offered.

Agents do not advertise or select a meeting room amenity and remarks focus strictly on residential and pool features. This indicates there is no dedicated meeting room.

Multiple listings explicitly describe significant outdoor space: phrases include 'private lanai', 'LARGE 316 sq.ft. wrap around lanai', 'wraparound lanai', 'huge wrap around private lanai', and 'Patio running around the outside of unit.' Although the MLS checkbox is set on 5 of 7 listings, every public remark block mentions a lanai/patio, providing strong, building‑level evidence that patio/deck amenities exist.

While the location is walkable to Waikiki and Ala Moana, no listing describes dedicated jogging or walking paths on-site. This supports that there is no formal jogging path amenity.

The building is marketed mainly for adult/urban use with pool and lanai features; playground-related terms never appear. This indicates the building does not offer a children's playground.

Across all remarks, outdoor space is described only as lanais/patios, never as a yard or fenced/private yard. Given the high-rise configuration and 0/4 MLS PRIYAR flags, it is very unlikely the building offers private yard areas.

Neither MLS data nor remarks suggest any putting green or golf practice area. It is almost certain the building has no putting green.

While there is a rooftop pool, no listing calls it a recreation or amenity deck and most agents leave RECARE unchecked. This points to the absence of a distinct, advertised recreation area beyond the pool itself.

Agents do not mark a recreation room amenity and remarks focus on the pool and lanais only. This suggests the building lacks a dedicated recreation room.

Listings emphasize proximity to Waikiki restaurants but never state an in-building restaurant or café. MLS amenities also omit RESTAU, indicating there is no on-site restaurant.

Remarks state 'Take a dip in the sparkling rooftop pool' and 'The building features a roof top pool with views in all directions', and another says 'take a stroll up to the rooftop pool'. This provides clear, repeated evidence that the building has rooftop amenities.

Listings highlight the rooftop pool but omit any reference to a sauna or steam facility. This indicates the building does not have a sauna.

Moderate evidence the building offers storage/lockers: 2 of 6 current MLS listings include storage-related amenities and 2 of 6 include storage in unit features, and one public remark explicitly says 'extra storage!'. The mentions are present across multiple listings/agents but limited in number, so confidence is moderate (implied rather than repeatedly described in remarks).

Searched public remarks for 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', and related terms; no references were found, so surfboard storage is not indicated in the listings.

There are no references to tennis courts in any remarks and MLS data shows no agents selecting TENCOU. Given the small Waikiki condo context, the building almost certainly has no tennis court.

Six of seven current MLS listings list the TRACHU amenity (previously 5 of 6), which provides strong evidence the building has a trash/garbage chute. None of the public remarks explicitly reference the chute, but the consistency across multiple MLS entries (likely entered by different agents) supports that the feature exists.

The remarks reference '2 secured parking', '1 covered, secured parking', and a 'tandem parking stall' but never valet or valet parking. This consistent description across listings strongly suggests there is no valet service at the building.

Three listings do not mark any gated or walled feature and none of the remarks describe the property as gated or fenced. The lone gated/wall/fence checkbox without supporting remarks appears inconsistent, so the building is unlikely to have a notable perimeter wall or gated enclosure.

Descriptions focus on a rooftop pool with views and do not reference any separate hot tub or spa feature. This supports that there is no whirlpool amenity.

Strong evidence the building has a shared pool: all 7 current MLS listings list pool in amenities and at least five public remarks explicitly mention a rooftop or sparkling pool (quotes: "sparkling rooftop pool," "roof top pool," "inviting pool with huge views"). Mentions appear across multiple agent remarks and align with historical high-confidence data, indicating a building-level shared pool.

Across four separate listings, the pool is described multiple times but never as heated, and no heated-pool options are selected in MLS. This consistent omission strongly suggests the building’s rooftop pool is not heated.

The building/rooftop pool is mentioned several times, but there is no explicit statement that the pool is salt water; searched for 'salt', 'saltwater', and 'saline' with no matches.

Strong evidence that some units have in-unit laundry: MLS property data lists washer/dryer in all 7 current listings and multiple agent remarks explicitly state "Washer & dryer in unit", "full size stacked front-loading washer and dryer", and "Washer & dryer conveniently located in the unit." The consistency across several listing remarks and the historical 7/7 inclusion indicate high confidence that the building offers in-unit laundry.

None of the four listings mention shared or community laundry (e.g., laundry room, coin laundry), and all 4/4 MLS entries omit the community laundry amenity. Given that building-level amenities are typically marked consistently when present, this provides strong evidence that there is no community laundry in the building. Therefore, the feature is set to false with high confidence.

Searched public remarks for terms like 'coin laundry', 'paid laundry', 'card operated', and 'quarters'. No evidence of paid community laundry; instead listings emphasize in-unit washer/dryer.

Searched public remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'floor-by-floor laundry'. Found no references; multiple listings explicitly state washer & dryer are in-unit, indicating no community laundry on every floor.

Every listing for this building includes at least one parking stall in MLS parking_features, and the remarks reference stalls with the units (e.g., '2 secured parking', '1 tandem parking stall'). This strongly indicates the building offers on-site parking for its units.

MLS data shows assigned parking checked on 2 out of 4 listings, suggesting stalls are individually designated even though remarks do not use the term 'assigned'. In Waikiki condo buildings, deeded or reserved stalls are standard, so it's likely stalls here are assigned.

Strong evidence across listings that the building offers covered parking: 7 of 7 current MLS listings show covered/garage parking in the parking_features and several remarks explicitly state 'one assigned covered parking stall #12' and '1 covered, secured parking'. Evidence is consistent across multiple agents/listings and aligns with historical high-confidence data.

Public remarks describe assigned/covered/secured/tandem parking stalls and specific stall numbers, but do not use language such as 'deeded', 'included in deed', or 'owned parking'. Therefore there is no evidence parking is deeded.

There is no mention of EV charging in any remarks and no EVCHRG checkbox used in MLS for any listing. Given the complete absence of references, the building likely does not offer dedicated EV charging stations.

Searched for phrases like 'parking fee', '$ per month', 'monthly parking', or 'parking rental' and found no mentions. The presence or amount of a monthly parking fee cannot be determined from the remarks.

Neither MLS data nor remarks mention guest or visitor parking. This consistent absence across all listings suggests the building does not provide dedicated guest parking stalls.

At least 2 of the 6 listings and the MLS checkboxes reference secured parking—key phrases include '2 secured parking in the heart of Waikiki' and '1 covered, secured parking'. While not every listing mentions it, consistent references and MLS flags across listings indicate the building offers secured-entry parking for some stalls.

There is clear building-level tandem parking availability: 4 of 7 current MLS listings indicate TANDEM in parking_features and at least one remark explicitly states '1 tandem parking stall'. Multiple listings/agents reflect tandem stalls, corroborating the historical high-confidence assessment.

No listing references valet service or attended parking, and the VALET option is never selected in MLS data. This strongly suggests the building does not offer valet parking.

Searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or similar phrases and found none. Absence of any waitlist language suggests there is no formal waitlist described in the public remarks.

Elevator security is never mentioned in remarks and is not reflected in the amenity checkboxes in any listing. This consistent absence indicates the building does not use keyed or fob-access elevators as a notable feature.

Searched public remarks for electronic/card/fob access terms. Listings reference 'secured parking' but do not explicitly describe card/fob access, so no confirmation.

Across 4 listings, there are no references to a security guard or on-site security staff. Given the repeated omission in both amenities and remarks, it's highly likely the building does not offer a staffed security guard service.

Searched public remarks for indications of a security patrol service and found none. Absence of mention suggests no patrol service is advertised.

The listings describe multiple building amenities but never mention video surveillance or security cameras, and agents are not checking any related amenity fields. This strongly suggests the building does not have a formal video security system advertised to buyers.

Across 4 listings, no remarks mention central air or HVAC, and 0/4 MLS entries check any central AC fields. One agent says 'AC is allowed in this unit,' suggesting cooling is not centrally provided. Together this strongly indicates the building does not have central AC.

None of the 4 listings check the split AC field or describe mini-split/ductless systems in the remarks. Agents instead talk about trade winds and AC being merely 'allowed,' not an installed split system. This pattern suggests the building is not characterized by split AC in its units.

MLS data shows 1/4 listings with the window AC inclusion checked, and none of the remarks conflict with this. An agent’s note that 'AC is allowed in this unit' aligns with individual window units rather than a central system. This supports that at least some units in the building have window AC.

All seven current MLS listings list the building material as concrete (MLS: 'CONCRE'), consistent with prior high-confidence data. Public remarks do not explicitly state the building material but contain no contradictions; evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents/listings.

Current MLS shows 1/7 listings with double-wall checked, but historical/high-confidence data indicated the building is concrete (no double-wall). None of the public remarks mention 'double wall' or similar phrasing; the single checked box appears to be a copy/paste or entry error, so double-wall is omitted.

Across all available listings, hollow tile construction is never mentioned or selected in MLS. This consistent omission strongly indicates the building is not identified as hollow-tile construction.

At least one listing explicitly flags masonry/stucco construction in MLS, and none contradict it. Although other agents did not check this box, such omissions are common, so there is moderate evidence the structure incorporates masonry/stucco finishes along with concrete.

MLS data never identifies the building as steel frame, while consistently identifying concrete construction. In the absence of any remark-based evidence of steel framing, it is very likely not classified as a steel-frame building in MLS terms.

Only one listing out of seven has 'SLAB' checked in MLS, but prior data showed no slab foundation identification and none of the public remarks mention 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation.' The weight of evidence indicates no slab designation for the building and the lone checked box is likely an error.

No analysis available

Across all listings, agents consistently select concrete construction and never select wood frame. For a Waikiki condo tower of this type, that strongly indicates the building is not wood-frame construction. No remarks reference any wood-frame elements.

At least one agent explicitly notes above-ground construction in MLS, and none contradict it. Given the building’s multi-story condo form, it is reasonable to treat above-ground construction as present despite inconsistent checkbox use.

No listing suggests any brick construction, and the MLS checkbox for brick is never used for this building. Given the building type and location, brick construction would be unusual and likely highlighted, so it is very likely not a brick building.

No MLS entry or remark references single-wall construction, and the building type is inconsistent with that method. This strongly indicates the building is not single-wall construction.

Looked for explicit statements such as 'short-term rental allowed', 'STR permitted', 'vacation rental allowed', or references to NUC/TVU/hotel rental program and found none. Marketing language alone is not sufficient to determine STR legality, so STR is not marked allowed based on the remarks.

Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', 'managed by hotel', or brand hotel pool references and found none. Because STR is not indicated as allowed, hotel pool participation is set to false.

Searched remarks for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or similar phrasing and found none. Additionally, STR is not indicated as allowed, so mandatory pool participation is false.

No listing remarks refer to fee simple ownership or land being included, and the MLS tenure flags show 0 of 4 as Fee Simple. Because the same MLS summary also shows 0 of 4 as Leasehold, the tenure situation cannot be determined confidently from available data.

None of the public remarks mention leasehold status, lease rent, or expiration dates, and the summarized MLS data shows 0 of 4 listings as Leasehold. With land tenure fields not clearly indicating either FS or LH, the presence of leasehold units remains uncertain.

Searched for terms like 'lease expires', 'land lease', 'ground lease', or explicit years (e.g., 'lease expires 2050') and found no references. No leasehold expiry year can be determined from the public remarks.

Searched the remarks for phrases such as 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. There is no evidence in the provided public remarks that the building is VA-approved.

The public remarks explicitly state the building has full hurricane insurance, indicating comprehensive/’walls-in’ style coverage for the building. This explicit phrasing supports a high-confidence true for insured_fully.

No listing remarks reference fire sprinklers or a sprinkler system, and none of the four MLS records have the fire-sprinkler amenity flagged. Given the lack of direct evidence either way, the presence or absence of a building-wide sprinkler system is unknown.

There is no language in the public remarks indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation. I searched for 'FLSE', 'fire life safety', 'passed fire inspection', and similar phrases and found none, so default to false with medium confidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

At least one unit remark says 'Ocean views from all over the apartment,' and rooftop pool comments describe wide Waikiki/South Shore vistas. This confirms the building offers ocean-view units and common-area ocean views.

At least 2 of the 7 listing remarks explicitly mention mountain views (quotes include "Enjoy beautiful mountain views" and "mountain views on the lanai"). Historical MLS summary also reported mountain views with high confidence. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and supports including building-level mountain views.

Across four listings, agents highlight ocean, mountain, and broad Waikiki/South Shore views but never mention Diamond Head. Given the specificity of other view descriptions, Diamond Head views are unlikely to be a notable feature.

1 of 6 listings mention city/skyline views, including the phrase 'soaking in the skyline' and references to watching Friday night fireworks from the rooftop. Given prior high-confidence data and current remarks confirming skyline/city vistas, the building offers units with city views.

Listings speak of 'huge views of the whole S Shore and all of Waikiki' plus extensive ocean views. These descriptions strongly suggest visible stretches of shoreline/coastline from the building’s higher levels.

0 of 7 listing remarks mention garden/courtyard/landscaped views; language emphasizes mountain, ocean, skyline and palm tree views rather than garden vistas. Given prior high-confidence absence and no current supporting remarks, the building is treated as not offering garden views.

Listings discuss ocean, mountain, skyline, canal, and broad Waikiki views but never reference a golf course. Given agents' tendency to highlight golf views when present, golf-course views are unlikely to be a notable feature.

1 of 6 listings explicitly references the building's location 'on the Ala Wai Canal' and rooftop views in all directions, supporting marina/harbor-type (canal) views. Combined with prior high-confidence MLS data, the evidence shows some units in the building offer canal/harbor views.

Across four listings, there are no mentions of sunrise or east-facing views, while other view types are described in detail. This indicates sunrise views are not a notable selling point for the building.

Remarks describe watching 'Friday night fireworks' from the rooftop pool, implying a west-facing orientation with evening/sunset vistas. This supports that the building offers sunset-type views from common areas and likely some units.

All remarks highlight proximity to beaches, canal, shopping, and Waikiki amenities with no reference to a cemetery. Given the location and silence on this point, cemetery views can be safely ruled out.

Remarks explicitly state Friday night fireworks can be watched from the rooftop pool (and thus from the building), providing strong evidence of fireworks view from the property.

No analysis available

No analysis available

None of the remarks discuss whether pets are allowed or restricted. With no explicit 'pets allowed' or 'no pets' language and no MLS NOPET flags, the building’s pet policy cannot be confirmed and is treated as not verified/likely restricted for now.

MLS checkbox data indicates 4 of 7 listings list RESMAN, supporting that the building has a resident/on-site manager. None of the current public remarks explicitly mention a resident or on-site manager (no phrases like 'resident manager' or 'on-site manager'), so while the feature is supported across multiple listings it may reflect standard checkbox usage by agents; retained with high confidence.

The units are marketed simply as condos suitable as a primary residence, vacation home, or investment, without any mention of hotel management or programs. The absence of condotel-specific language across all listings and MLS supports that this is not a condotel building.

Remarks describe the property as 'a 699 sqft condo at Oahu Surf II' with no reference to co-op structures. Combined with the lack of any COOTAX or co-op indicators in MLS, this strongly indicates the building is not a cooperative.