Oahu Surf 1

MLS property data is unanimous: 13 of 13 listings report the building as built in 1972. No listing text suggests a different construction year or a complete rebuild, so 1972 is accepted with high confidence.

The penthouse listing is on floor 13, and the MLS floor field also reaches 13. The county and state figures of 14 are treated as non-residential or record-level floor counts.

County assessor data reports 58 reconciled residential units, matching the state registration's 58 units. The parcel has one structure and one condominium registration, so these figures apply to this building.

Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 268. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.

Multiple listings explicitly confirm that the building has two elevators, including references to both elevators being overhauled and two new elevators. This matches the current value of 2 with very high confidence.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Listings specifically reference split AC and wall-mounted AC inside units, not a building-wide central system. With 0/13 listings checking central AC in the fee-includes field, it is very unlikely that central AC is a fee-covered utility.

Across 13 listings, none indicate cable TV is included in the association fees and no public remarks reference cable in the maintenance. This strongly suggests residents pay for their own cable service separately.

One listing explicitly says, 'Maintenance fee includes hot water, water, sewer, and common area expenses.' OTCOEX appears in 11 of 16 current MLS records, providing strong building-level support despite limited direct remark detail.

No MLS records indicate cooperative taxes are part of the fees, and the language used is consistent with a condominium rather than a co-op. This makes it highly unlikely that co-op taxes are included in the maintenance fee.

The combination of 0/13 MLS entries including electricity and a remark that the fee is charged 'plus electric usage' is strong direct evidence that unit electricity is not included. Residents appear responsible for their own electric bills.

Gas inclusion is effectively unsupported: only 1 of 15 MLS records checks GAS, and the public remarks contain no gas-related HOA coverage language. This is consistent with the prior high-confidence assessment that gas is not included.

One listing directly states, 'Maintenance fee includes hot water,' while HOTWAT is present in 12 of 16 current records. No listings contain WTRHTR, and the repeated MLS pattern strongly supports building-supplied hot water.

Neither MLS data nor public remarks suggest that internet service is bundled into the maintenance fees. This indicates residents arrange and pay for their own internet separately.

No MLS entries or remarks indicate marina access or boat slip fees are part of the association fees. The building is marketed for its rooftop pool and Waikiki location, not marina amenities, so marina fees are almost certainly not included.

One listing explicitly states that the HOA fee covers sewer, and SEWER appears in 15 of 16 current listings. The evidence is strong across the MLS records and is reinforced by direct public-remark language.

One listing directly states that the HOA fee covers water, while WATER appears in 15 of 16 current MLS records. The near-unanimous MLS pattern and explicit remark strongly support water inclusion.

None of the listings describe any BBQ grills or outdoor cooking areas. The absence of both remarks and MLS amenity flags indicates the building likely does not provide BBQ facilities.

Across all provided remarks, there are no explicit mentions of bike storage, a bike room, or bicycle racks as a building amenity, and MLS amenities show 0/13 listings with bike storage checked. Because agents repeatedly describe key amenities (pool, storage, security, resident manager) but never reference any dedicated bike storage, it is very likely that the building does not offer a formal bike storage facility.

Listings highlight proximity to beaches and Ala Wai Canal views but do not reference any direct boating or dock facilities. Combined with MLS data, this indicates there is no boat dock amenity.

Parking and storage are mentioned, but not any car wash amenity. With no supporting MLS data, it is highly likely the building does not have car wash facilities.

The building’s amenities are consistently described as a rooftop pool, deck, resident manager, storage, and parking, with no reference to a clubhouse. MLS data likewise does not list a clubhouse amenity.

Across all public remarks, there is no mention of concierge, front desk service, or similar services. The only staff role highlighted is a resident manager, indicating the building likely does not offer concierge service.

One listing calls the building "pet-friendly," but there is no indication of a dedicated dog park or run. The absence of both textual and MLS evidence suggests no formal dog park amenity.

Multiple listings describe building amenities and staff but never mention a doorman or lobby attendant. The focus on a resident manager and electronic access systems suggests the building does not have a doorman service.

Across all provided remarks, there is no reference to a fitness center, gym, or exercise room. Combined with the MLS data showing no exercise-room amenity checked, this strongly suggests the building does not offer this feature.

Despite being a Waikiki building, none of the listings mention limousine or building-operated car service. MLS also does not indicate such a service, so this amenity can be safely ruled out.

Listings focus on residential and rooftop amenities only, without mentioning any meeting or conference space. MLS amenity checkboxes also do not indicate a meeting room exists.

Patio/deck access is strongly supported. Across the listings, roughly 15+ remarks mention outdoor space using phrases like "spacious lanai," "wraparound lanai," "large lanai," "private lanai," "balcony," and "rooftop deck." The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and appears to be a genuine building feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox error.

Although the location is near beaches and parks, listings do not describe any dedicated jogging or walking path within the property. MLS amenity data confirms no jogging path is recorded for the building.

Amenities discussed are adult-oriented (rooftop pool, views, storage, parking) with no reference to children’s play structures or playgrounds. MLS also does not list a playground, indicating this feature is not present.

Across all listings, outdoor space is consistently described as lanais and a rooftop deck/pool, with no mention of any yard or enclosed ground-level outdoor area. Given the high-rise, urban nature of the building and lack of PRIYAR in MLS amenities, it is very unlikely that any units have a true private yard.

No agent remarks describe a putting green or similar golf amenity. MLS data likewise shows no putting-green amenity, so it is very likely the building does not offer one.

Several listings mention a rooftop pool and deck where residents can "relax," "soak up the sun," and enjoy panoramic city, mountain, and ocean views. This shared rooftop deck serves as a common recreation area for residents.

Agents describe unit interiors and rooftop amenities but not an indoor rec or game room. The lack of both textual and MLS evidence points to there being no dedicated recreation room.

Agents emphasize proximity to Waikiki’s restaurants and cafes rather than any in-building dining facility. The lack of on-site restaurant references and MLS flags indicates this amenity is not present.

At least eight listings describe a rooftop pool and/or rooftop deck (e.g., "residents can relax at the rooftop heated saltwater pool" and "Enjoy the rooftop deck with a pool"). This repeated, detailed wording across multiple agents confirms shared rooftop amenities for the building.

Amenities lists are fairly detailed but never include a sauna or steam facility. With zero MLS flags for a sauna, it is very likely this building does not have one.

Storage is clearly present in this building. Multiple listings explicitly mention it in both unit and building contexts, including phrases like 'additional storage,' 'extra storage,' 'storage unit,' and 'Amenities include resident Manager, storage.' This is consistent with the prior MLS data showing storage in many listings, so confidence is very high.

The remarks mention storage lockers and generic additional storage but do not identify surfboard or board storage facilities. Generic storage is insufficient to establish this specific feature.

Listings consistently highlight the rooftop pool and views but never mention tennis courts. With MLS also not showing tennis, it is very likely this building has no tennis court facilities.

Trash chute appears in 9 of 15 MLS records for this building, giving moderate support that the amenity exists. None of the public remarks explicitly mention a trash/garbage chute, so this is based mainly on the MLS amenity pattern rather than descriptive confirmation. Because it is a building-level feature buyers would care about, it should be included with medium confidence.

Parking is described in detail (e.g., "2 parking stalls," "tandem parking," "secure, covered parking stall"), yet valet or valet parking is never referenced. This consistent omission, combined with unchecked MLS valet amenities, strongly indicates there is no valet service in the building.

Listings describe the building as a Waikiki condo with street access and make no reference to gates, walls, or perimeter fencing. With MLS amenities for GATED/WALFEN unchecked, it is very unlikely the property is enclosed by a wall or fence.

The only water amenity described is a rooftop heated saltwater pool; no separate spa or whirlpool is referenced. MLS amenity data supports that there is no whirlpool/hot tub feature.

The pool feature is strongly confirmed by the current remarks and prior MLS data. At least 10+ listings mention a rooftop pool, often with phrases like 'heated rooftop pool,' 'rooftop heated saltwater pool,' and 'rooftop pool and deck,' indicating this is a consistent building amenity rather than a one-off agent error.

At least 9 of 16 current listings explicitly mention the heated pool, including repeated phrases such as 'heated rooftop swimming pool' and 'rooftop heated saltwater pool.' The evidence is consistent across multiple listing descriptions and confirms the historically high-confidence building amenity, despite the HEATED checkbox being absent from pool_features.

Several listings directly identify the building's heated rooftop pool as saltwater. The repeated wording provides strong evidence that the pool is saltwater.

At least 9 of the 16 provided remarks explicitly mention in-unit laundry, including "in-unit washer and dryer," "washer/dryer," "Electrolux W/D," and "private washer/dryer." The evidence is strong across multiple listings and aligns with the 16/16 current MLS inclusion records, confirming that in-unit laundry is available in the building.

There is no indication of shared/community laundry facilities in either the MLS amenity checkboxes (0/13 listings) or in any of the detailed remarks, which instead consistently highlight in-unit laundry. This absence across many listings and agents, combined with the focus on in-unit washer/dryers, supports concluding that the building does not have community laundry.

The remarks consistently refer to in-unit laundry and provide no evidence of paid community laundry. No coin, card, fee, or payment-related laundry language was found.

The remarks mention in-unit washers and dryers but do not describe community laundry facilities on every floor. No floor-by-floor laundry wording was found, so this feature is treated as not present with low-to-medium confidence.

Parking is clearly available for this building across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention parking in varied forms, including '2 parking unit,' '2 PARKING STALLS,' 'one parking stall,' and 'covered parking stall,' confirming this is not a copy-paste anomaly.

Assigned parking is strongly supported by the current MLS data and remarks. At least 1 listing explicitly says "1 assigned parking stall," and several others reference specific secured or designated parking spaces; the evidence is consistent with the previously high-confidence assessment.

Covered parking is confirmed by multiple independent listing remarks. At least 3 listings explicitly reference a secured garage or "covered parking stall," in addition to 8 of 16 current MLS records carrying covered/garage indicators, making this a strong building-level feature.

The listings consistently confirm that parking is available, including tandem and assigned stalls. However, no direct language says the parking is deeded, included in the deed, or separately owned.

Across all provided listings, there are no references to EV charging or stations, and no MLS entries show EVCHRG. Given the number of independent listings and the marketing value of EV amenities, it is very likely this building does not offer EV charging.

I searched for parking fees, monthly parking charges, rental costs, and additional parking expenses. The remarks discuss parking availability but provide no parking fee amount.

The listings discuss resident stalls in detail but never mention 'guest parking' or 'visitor parking,' and the MLS data shows no GUEST flag for any unit. This consistent absence strongly suggests the building does not provide designated guest parking.

Multiple units reference secured parking, including phrases like 'secure, covered parking stall' and '2 secured tandem parking stalls,' and building security features like FOB access are mentioned. Together with some MLS SECENT flags, this indicates the parking area has secured entry.

Tandem parking is very strongly supported across the listing history and current remarks. At least 5 listings explicitly describe tandem parking, including "rare tandem parking," "2 PARKING (tandem)," and "2 secured tandem parking stalls," indicating this is a legitimate building feature rather than an isolated checkbox error.

Across all listings, there is detailed discussion of stall type and security but no mention of 'valet' or 'attended' parking, and the MLS data never flags VALET. This consistent omission indicates the building does not offer valet parking.

The remarks describe available, assigned, covered, secured, and tandem parking. None mention a building parking waitlist or a process for joining one.

One listing specifically describes 'FOB entry' and 'secured elevator access,' implying that elevator access is controlled by a key or fob. This strongly supports that the building has secure, restricted-access elevators.

The remarks describe FOB entry and secured elevator access, which directly indicates a card or fob-based access security system. This evidence is consistent across the building descriptions.

Across all listings, there are no references to a security guard, 24/7 security personnel, or on-site security staff. Security is instead described in terms of secure entry, FOB access, and security cameras, making it unlikely that the building offers a staffed guard service.

The remarks mention secure entry, FOB access, secured elevators, and security cameras, but do not mention security guards or patrol services. Because no patrol evidence was found, this feature is treated as not present with low-to-medium confidence.

At least one listing clearly notes 'security cameras' as part of the building's security. Even though other listings don’t repeat this phrase, this explicit mention is strong evidence that the building has a video security system.

No listing remarks mention central air or HVAC, and instead describe individual systems such as 'split AC' and 'wall-mounted AC' in specific units. Only 1 of 13 MLS records checks a central A/C box, which conflicts with the consistent remark pattern and strongly points to a checkbox mistake rather than a true building-wide feature. Based on this, central air conditioning is treated as not present in the building.

Split AC is clearly present in this building/unit set. At least 2 listings explicitly say "split AC" or "3 split AC systems," and the historical MLS pattern showed ACSPL appearing in most listings. The evidence is consistent across multiple remarks and aligns with the existing MLS inclusion code.

A small minority of MLS records (2 of 13) indicate window A/C via checkboxes, but no listing remarks describe window units explicitly. The narrative descriptions instead focus on split and wall-mounted systems, suggesting the window A/C entries may be inconsistent or erroneous. Because of this, window A/C is not considered a confirmed feature of the building.

Concrete construction is supported by all 16 current listings marking the construction material as “CONCRE.” None of the provided remarks explicitly mentions concrete or reinforced concrete, but the consistent building-level MLS data across all listings provides strong evidence that the building is constructed with concrete.

Most agents do not mark double-wall construction, and all mark concrete, suggesting the building is not considered a double-wall structure. Double-wall is mainly used to describe wood-framed houses, not reinforced-concrete Waikiki condos like this one.

No agents have marked hollow tile in the MLS, and none of the listing narratives mention hollow tile. Given the consistent concrete classification, hollow tile construction is very unlikely here.

A small minority of listings mark masonry/stucco, but the vast majority do not, and none of the remarks mention stucco or masonry walls. This pattern, combined with consistent concrete classification, indicates the building is not treated as masonry-stucco construction in practice.

Agents consistently classify the building as concrete, not steel frame, across all recent listings. Listing remarks focus on finishes and amenities but never mention steel framing, which would likely be highlighted if it were a defining construction type.

Only one listing marks slab construction, while the overwhelming majority do not, and no remarks reference slab-on-grade or similar terms. Following the guidance to disregard sparsely checked features without remark support, this building is not treated as having a notable slab-construction attribute in the MLS data.

No analysis available

No listings indicate wood frame construction, and this is a high-rise condo with features like rooftop pool and elevators, which in Waikiki are almost exclusively concrete rather than wood frame. Remarks never mention any wood frame structure or similar terms.

The above-ground construction flag appears in a small minority of MLS entries and is not supported by any narrative remarks. Given the concrete high-rise form, it is more consistent with a standard tower on a structural foundation than a raised above-ground structure.

There is no MLS or remarks evidence that the building has brick construction. In a Waikiki high-rise context, brick construction would be atypical and likely called out if present.

No MLS records or remarks indicate single-wall construction. The high-rise style, elevators, and rooftop pool are fundamentally at odds with the single-wall construction method used in older Hawaiian cottages.

The listings mention potential rental income and excellent long-term rental potential, but do not establish that short-term rentals are allowed. One listing specifically says, "Buyer to verify rental guidelines," so STR permission is not supported by the remarks.

I searched for hotel rental pool, hotel rental program, hotel management, Hilton pool, Trump pool, and similar language. The references to Hilton are only about fireworks views, and STR is not established, so this is false.

The remarks do not say that owners must participate in a hotel rental pool or that units must be enrolled in a rental program. Because STR is not supported and no mandatory participation language appears, this is false.

None of the 13 listings mention 'fee simple' or similar language in the remarks, and the provided tenure fields are blank for both FS and LH. Because tenure is not discussed in the text, the presence of fee simple units remains unknown and is defaulted to false with low confidence.

Listing remarks do not reference leasehold status or any land lease terms, and the structured tenure data provided does not show LH on any of the 13 listings. Leasehold tenure for this building therefore cannot be confirmed and is treated as absent with low confidence.

I searched for leasehold language, lease expiration years, ground lease terms, and renewal dates. None of the remarks identify a specific lease expiry year, so the value is unknown.

The listings repeatedly advertise assumable VA financing and eligibility for veterans. This is strong, direct public evidence that VA financing is supported.

The remarks were searched for fully insured, full insurance, comprehensive building insurance, walls-in coverage, and equivalent HOA insurance language. No such statement was found; references to maintenance fees and common-area expenses do not establish full building insurance coverage.

Across all 13 listings, neither the MLS amenities nor the public remarks mention fire sprinklers. This consistent absence strongly suggests that a building-wide fire sprinkler system is not present.

The remarks were searched for fire/life safety evaluation language, FLSE, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, and passed fire inspection statements. None of these terms or equivalent claims were found, so there is no public-remarks evidence that the evaluation passed.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are strongly supported across multiple listings and agents, with at least 8 of 16 MLS records identifying ocean views. Remarks explicitly describe 'breathtaking, panoramic ocean' views, 'stunning ocean views,' ocean-facing units, and rooftop or lanai views of the ocean, indicating this is a legitimate building-level offering rather than a single unsupported claim.

Mountain views are clearly present in multiple listings, with at least 5-6 remarks referencing mountains directly. Key phrases include 'Ko'olau mountains,' 'green mountain & Ala Wai views,' and rooftop views that include mountains. The evidence is consistent across several agents and unit types.

Across many listings, agents detail a wide range of views (ocean, Fort DeRussy, Ala Wai canal, Tantalus, St. Louis Heights) but never mention Diamond Head. Combined with 0 of 13 MLS records checking DIAHEA, there is strong evidence that Diamond Head views are not a notable building feature.

City views are strongly established, appearing in 13 of 16 current MLS view descriptions and being confirmed by multiple public remarks. Key phrases include 'breathtaking views of the city,' 'check out the sites of the city,' 'city, mountain, and ocean views,' and rooftop views of the city, supporting a building-level feature.

Even in highly detailed view descriptions such as '270 degree view from the ocean and Fort Derussy to Tantalus', agents stop at 'ocean views' and do not claim specific coastline/shoreline vistas. With only one MLS checkbox for COASTL and no textual corroboration, coastline view is likely not a consistent selling point.

Agents highlight 'palm trees' and Fort DeRussy Park, but not in the sense of a dedicated garden or courtyard view. Given the lack of any explicit garden-view language and zero MLS checks for GARDEN, this is not treated as a distinct garden-view building feature.

Although the building is near Ala Wai Golf Course and that course is mentioned as a nearby amenity, none of the many detailed view descriptions mention a golf course or fairways. With 12 of 13 MLS listings not checking GOLCOU and no textual support, golf course views are unlikely to be a meaningful building feature.

Marina-style waterway views are supported by remarks referencing the Ala Wai canal, which fits the canal/harbor definition in the feature guidance. While fewer listings mention it than ocean/mountain/city, the explicit 'Ala Wai canal' reference is enough to include it with high confidence. The evidence suggests some units have canal-facing exposure.

Sunrise views are directly confirmed in current remarks. At least 3-4 listings mention sunrise or morning light, including 'sunrise to sunset views' and 'the sun rising over the ocean.' This is strong evidence that some stacks have eastern exposure or sunrise-facing outlooks.

Sunset views are very well supported, with at least 5-6 listings referencing sunset, evening views, or rooftop enjoyment at sunset. Phrases like 'sunrise to sunset views,' 'admiring the sunset,' and fireworks from the lanai reinforce the evening exposure. This appears to be a reliable and recurring building feature.

Across numerous listings covering many orientations and high-floor units, no agent mentions a cemetery in the view description. Combined with zero MLS records checking a cemetery view, this feature can be confidently excluded.

The remarks repeatedly and directly describe views of Hilton Hawaiian Village Friday night fireworks from residences and lanais. This is strong, consistent evidence that units in the building have fireworks views.

No analysis available

A listing states clearly that this is a "pet-friendly building," which directly confirms pets are allowed. No remarks or MLS restrictions contradict this, so the evidence supports that pets are permitted, possibly with standard building rules.

Strong, repeated evidence across the listings indicates this building has an on-site resident manager. At least 2 listings explicitly mention a "resident manager," and the historical MLS pattern (12/15 listings with RESMAN) suggests this is a consistent building feature rather than a one-off agent entry. The wording appears consistent across agents and is reinforced by the current remarks.

Remarks focus on residential and long-term use (e.g., "ideal investment" with "long term rental potential," "first time home buyers") and do not reference nightly rentals or hotel programs. The absence of any condotel language across many listings and in MLS strongly indicates this is not a condotel building.

All descriptions treat the property as a standard fee-simple condo with HOA fees, not a share-based cooperative. The complete lack of co-op terminology in remarks and MLS data makes it very likely this is not a cooperative building.