Northbrook-Melemanu
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Northbrook-Melemanu
Building Overview
Northbrook-Melemanu in Mililani-Waipio; concrete 1973 building with pool and BBQ area.
About Northbrook-Melemanu
Based on MLS data, Northbrook-Melemanu is a concrete residential building located in the Mililani‑Waipio neighborhood, originally built in 1973. Unit size information is not provided in the available MLS records.
The building has one elevator and on-site amenities that include a pool, a BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. Air conditioning is provided via window units according to the listing details.
Parking is available, covered, and assigned, with additional guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS data. The management company is listed as unknown. These details are based on MLS data and should be independently verified by prospective buyers or their agents.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy percentages and softer indicators such as "mostly owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied," but found none. Because the remarks provide no ownership-rate data, the percentage remains unknown.
The public remarks do mention elevator access several times, including units being near "the elevator" and residents accessing the building by "either the elevator or stairs." That supports the current value of 1 elevator. I did not find any indication of multiple elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity appears to be included based on the MLS consensus, with 14 of 20 listings checking OTCOEX. The public remarks across listings do not specifically call this out, so the evidence is primarily from the MLS pattern rather than agent commentary. This looks like a consistent building-level inclusion rather than a one-off listing error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is very likely not included in the maintenance fee. None of the current MLS listings include HOTWAT, while many explicitly show WTRHTR, which is a strong counter-signal for building-supplied hot water. The remarks across listings do not contradict that pattern.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included in the maintenance fee. The MLS data is very strong at 19 of 20 listings checking SEWER, and the public remarks do not indicate a change. This looks like a stable building-wide inclusion.
Water appears to be included in the maintenance fee. Nineteen of 20 MLS listings check WATER, which is a highly consistent signal across the building. The public remarks do not contradict the MLS consensus.
The building has clear shared BBQ/grilling facilities. Multiple current remarks mention 'BBQ areas,' 'BBQ area,' or 'BBQ' alongside pool and recreation amenities, reinforcing the historical MLS signal. The evidence appears consistent across several listings and different agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks do not mention 'car wash', 'auto wash', or similar terms in any listing, and there is no historical support for a car wash amenity. Given complete absence in remarks across the dataset, the car wash amenity is omitted despite a lone MLS checkbox, which likely reflects inconsistent data entry.
Several listings reference a 'Valley Recreation Center' and a 'recreation area with pool table, chairs and shade', which functions as a community clubhouse.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence from at least 15 listings describes private lanais, balconies, patios, or yards (e.g., “large private lanai,” “private, covered lanai,” “screened-in patio,” and “spacious balcony”). These repeated, detailed remarks from multiple agents across different units indicate that the building commonly offers patio/lanai-style outdoor spaces, even if the MLS checkbox is inconsistently used.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Some ground-floor listings explicitly mention 'dual private yards', a 'shared yard', and enjoying 'views of your backyard oasis', indicating certain units have direct yard access.
No analysis available
The building offers a shared recreation area / recreation space. Current remarks repeatedly mention 'recreation area,' 'recreation space,' and 'rec area,' and one listing describes resident access to a recreation area with a pool table, chairs, and shade. This is strong building-level evidence across multiple remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Current MLS data shows 2 of 20 listings with STORAG in unit_features, suggesting dedicated extra storage is available with at least some units, although remarks do not detail storage lockers.
I searched for surfboard-storage language such as surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or bike-and-surfboard storage and found none. The public remarks focus on parking, pool, recreation, and storage inside units, not dedicated surfboard storage.
No public remarks mention a tennis court (search terms like 'tennis court' or 'tennis' are absent) while historical data shows no prior confidence. Given the absence of any descriptive remarks across the listings, the tennis court amenity is omitted; the small number of MLS checkbox flags (2/20) likely reflects inconsistent agent entry rather than a true building amenity.
The building has a trash chute system. While fewer current remarks mention it than BBQ or recreation amenities, the historical MLS data was already direct, and at least one current listing explicitly says the building is 'equipped with a trash chute.' This supports a building-level amenity rather than a unit-specific feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool evidence is overwhelming and consistent. Dozens of current remarks explicitly reference a "pool," "large swimming pool," "community pool," "pool on property," or access to the recreation center with a swimming pool. This appears across many different listings/agents, so it is not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
I reviewed all pool references for salt-water wording such as saltwater pool, salt pool, or saline pool and found none. The remarks only say there is a pool or swimming pool.
In-unit laundry is very strongly supported across the listing set. Multiple remarks explicitly mention it in different units and time periods, including "in-unit washer/dryer," "new stacked washer and dryer," "washer and dryer INSIDE the unit," and "full-size, in-unit washer and dryer." This appears consistent across many listings and agents, not a one-off or copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
I looked for wording indicating paid shared laundry facilities, such as coin laundry, card-operated machines, or laundry fees, and found nothing. The remarks consistently describe in-unit washer/dryer instead of community laundry.
I searched the public remarks for language like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," or similar community-laundry references and found none. The listings only mention in-unit washer/dryer, which does not support this feature.
Parking is overwhelmingly confirmed at the building level. Across the current remarks, dozens of listings mention phrases like "2 assigned parking stalls," "2 covered parking stalls," "one open parking," and "parking garage," which strongly supports that the building offers parking across units.
Assigned parking is strongly supported by both the MLS history and the remarks. Many listings explicitly state "2 ASSIGNED PARKING STALLS," "two assigned parking stalls," or "assigned parking stall conveniently located near the building," indicating this is a real building-level feature rather than a one-off agent error.
Covered parking is well supported and appears repeatedly across the remarks. Multiple listings mention "2 covered parking stalls," "one covered parking and one open parking," and direct access from the parking garage, which is consistent with the MLS history and confirms covered parking is available in the building.
I looked for explicit deeded-parking wording such as deeded stall, owned parking, or parking included in deed. The listings describe parking as assigned and covered/open, which does not establish deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language, including monthly charges or rental fees for stalls. The remarks only describe how many stalls are included, not any separate parking cost.
Guest parking is supported by both historical MLS data and numerous current remarks. Several listings explicitly call out "ample guest parking," "multiple guest stalls," and even "14 guest parking stalls on the same level," suggesting this is a shared building amenity and not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, joining a list, or waiting for a stall, and found none. The remarks instead consistently mention assigned or included stalls.
No analysis available
I searched for card/fob access language like keycard entry, electronic access, or card reader and found no evidence. The remarks mention security patrol and a security screen, but not a card-based access system.
Security guard service is supported by multiple remarks across the listing set. At least 2 listings explicitly mention it with phrases like "on-site security patrol" and "24-hour security," which aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS amenity data (SECGUA in 7/20 listings). The evidence appears consistent across different agents, not just a single copy-paste remark.
This feature is directly supported by multiple listings. The remarks explicitly describe on-site security patrol, with one listing also noting 24-hour security, which strongly confirms patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks for this building mention split, mini-split, or ductless AC, despite many detailed renovation descriptions; when AC is described, it is explicitly "window AC in every room," not split systems. Only 2 of 20 MLS records check the split-AC box and none back it up in text, suggesting these are agent input errors rather than real features. Taken together, the evidence strongly indicates that units in this building do not have split AC systems.
At least one listing states 'a window AC in every room' after describing upgrades, indicating that window air conditioners are present and allowed.
There is overwhelming building-level evidence for concrete construction: 20 of 20 MLS listings show CONCRE in construction_materials. The remarks do not directly say 'concrete,' but they consistently describe the same Northbrook-Melemanu condo building, and the MLS data is uniformly aligned, indicating this is not a copy-paste outlier.
Limited evidence for double-wall construction: only 3 of 20 current MLS records list DOUWAL, and none of the public remarks mention "double wall," "double-wall construction," or similar. This suggests the few checked boxes may be agent data-entry choices rather than an actual building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 3 of 20 current listings include SLAB in construction_materials, so the evidence is limited and likely reflects either partial MLS entry consistency or a subset of records. None of the public remarks explicitly mention a slab foundation, so this feature is included with moderate confidence based on MLS data only.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No substantive evidence of 'above ground' construction: only 2 of 20 MLS records checked ABOGRO and no public remarks describe the building as "above ground" or reference above-ground construction materials. Many remarks explicitly reference ground-floor units, suggesting ABOGRO is not supported by listing text.
Across 20 recent listings, there are no narrative references to brick, brick exteriors, or brick-and-mortar construction, while one listing explicitly notes 'solid concrete' construction. With just 3/20 MLS records checking BRICK and all others omitting it, the weight of evidence indicates the structure is not brick-built. The small number of BRICK selections are most consistent with copy/paste or checkbox mistakes rather than actual brick construction.
No analysis available
I searched for STR indicators such as legal vacation rental, NUC, TVU, hotel-style rental language, or explicit permission to short-term rent. Nothing in the remarks suggests STR is allowed, so the safest read from public remarks is false.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as Hilton, Trump, Ritz, managed-by-hotel, or hotel program language. None appeared, and because STR is not supported, this must be false.
I searched for wording like mandatory participation, required rental program, or cannot opt out. There were no such mentions, and with no evidence of STR, this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as lease expiry years, ground lease dates, or renewal terms, but found nothing. Because there is no explicit expiration year in the remarks, the lease expiry remains unknown.
The public remarks consistently confirm VA financing is accepted in this building. This is repeated across many listings with direct language, so confidence is very high.
I looked for insurance-related language that would indicate fully insured HOA coverage or walls-in insurance, but the remarks do not mention it. Since there is no direct evidence in the listing text, this feature remains unverified and is treated as false at low confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit fire/life safety compliance language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, or passed fire inspection, but found nothing. With no positive evidence in the public remarks, this remains unverified and is treated as false at low confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are strongly supported across many current listings, with explicit phrases like "breathtaking mountain views," "lush mountain views," "scenic mountain views," and "breathtaking mountain vistas." The evidence appears across multiple agents and unit types, so this is not just one isolated remark or checkbox artifact. This aligns with the previously high-confidence history that the building offers mountain-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden/greenery views are strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention 'garden views' or closely matching terms such as 'lush greenery,' 'green views,' 'trees and lawn,' and 'well-manicured lawn,' indicating the building offers units with garden-like outlooks. This appears to be a real building-level feature, not just one agent's copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are supported by both historical and current remarks. At least 2 current listings explicitly reference sunsets, including phrases like "beautiful sunrises or sunsets" and "enriching every sunset," alongside other listings describing western-facing style views and evening light. The evidence looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit references to viewing Friday night fireworks from the unit, lanai, or building, and found none. Remarks describe mountain, garden, green, stream, and treetop views, but not fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is supported primarily by MLS amenity data rather than the public remarks. Across the recent listing set, 14 of 20 listings include RESMAN, which suggests this is a commonly reported building feature. The remarks reviewed here do not explicitly say 'resident manager' or 'on-site manager,' so the evidence is moderate rather than explicit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.