Northbrook-Melemanu
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Northbrook-Melemanu
Building Overview
Northbrook-Melemanu in Mililani-Waipio; concrete 1973 building with pool and BBQ area.
About Northbrook-Melemanu
Based on MLS data, Northbrook-Melemanu is a concrete residential building located in the Mililani‑Waipio neighborhood, originally built in 1973. Unit size information is not provided in the available MLS records.
The building has one elevator and on-site amenities that include a pool, a BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. Air conditioning is provided via window units according to the listing details.
Parking is available, covered, and assigned, with additional guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS data. The management company is listed as unknown. These details are based on MLS data and should be independently verified by prospective buyers or their agents.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The county records 10 floors, and listings support floor 10 through both the MLS floor field and unit-number-derived floors. The lone floor-field value of 301 is inconsistent and was set aside.
The county parcel record gives 132 reconciled residential units, matching its residential CPR and dwelling sum; the parcel contains one structure grouping for this record. No independent state or MLS unit total is available.
I searched for explicit percentages and qualitative descriptions such as majority, mostly, or highly owner occupied. Although one listing mentions owner-occupants as a possible buyer type, it does not establish the percentage of owner-occupied units.
Multiple listings consistently describe a singular elevator, including 'the elevator' and 'either the elevator or stairs.' This supports the current value of 1 elevator.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity appears to be included based on the MLS consensus, with 14 of 20 listings checking OTCOEX. The public remarks across listings do not specifically call this out, so the evidence is primarily from the MLS pattern rather than agent commentary. This looks like a consistent building-level inclusion rather than a one-off listing error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is very likely not included in the maintenance fee. None of the current MLS listings include HOTWAT, while many explicitly show WTRHTR, which is a strong counter-signal for building-supplied hot water. The remarks across listings do not contradict that pattern.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included in the maintenance fee. The MLS data is very strong at 19 of 20 listings checking SEWER, and the public remarks do not indicate a change. This looks like a stable building-wide inclusion.
Water appears to be included in the maintenance fee. Nineteen of 20 MLS listings check WATER, which is a highly consistent signal across the building. The public remarks do not contradict the MLS consensus.
The building has clear shared BBQ/grilling facilities. Multiple current remarks mention 'BBQ areas,' 'BBQ area,' or 'BBQ' alongside pool and recreation amenities, reinforcing the historical MLS signal. The evidence appears consistent across several listings and different agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks do not mention 'car wash', 'auto wash', or similar terms in any listing, and there is no historical support for a car wash amenity. Given complete absence in remarks across the dataset, the car wash amenity is omitted despite a lone MLS checkbox, which likely reflects inconsistent data entry.
Several listings reference a 'Valley Recreation Center' and a 'recreation area with pool table, chairs and shade', which functions as a community clubhouse.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence from at least 15 listings describes private lanais, balconies, patios, or yards (e.g., “large private lanai,” “private, covered lanai,” “screened-in patio,” and “spacious balcony”). These repeated, detailed remarks from multiple agents across different units indicate that the building commonly offers patio/lanai-style outdoor spaces, even if the MLS checkbox is inconsistently used.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Some ground-floor listings explicitly mention 'dual private yards', a 'shared yard', and enjoying 'views of your backyard oasis', indicating certain units have direct yard access.
No analysis available
The building offers a shared recreation area / recreation space. Current remarks repeatedly mention 'recreation area,' 'recreation space,' and 'rec area,' and one listing describes resident access to a recreation area with a pool table, chairs, and shade. This is strong building-level evidence across multiple remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Current MLS data shows 2 of 20 listings with STORAG in unit_features, suggesting dedicated extra storage is available with at least some units, although remarks do not detail storage lockers.
The listings describe parking, closets, and other storage-related features but do not identify a dedicated surfboard or board-storage facility.
No public remarks mention a tennis court (search terms like 'tennis court' or 'tennis' are absent) while historical data shows no prior confidence. Given the absence of any descriptive remarks across the listings, the tennis court amenity is omitted; the small number of MLS checkbox flags (2/20) likely reflects inconsistent agent entry rather than a true building amenity.
The building has a trash chute system. While fewer current remarks mention it than BBQ or recreation amenities, the historical MLS data was already direct, and at least one current listing explicitly says the building is 'equipped with a trash chute.' This supports a building-level amenity rather than a unit-specific feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool evidence is overwhelming and consistent. Dozens of current remarks explicitly reference a "pool," "large swimming pool," "community pool," "pool on property," or access to the recreation center with a swimming pool. This appears across many different listings/agents, so it is not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
A pool is confirmed in the listings, consistent with the building context, but no salt-water terminology appears. Therefore, saltwater status is unsupported.
In-unit laundry is very strongly supported across the listing set. Multiple remarks explicitly mention it in different units and time periods, including "in-unit washer/dryer," "new stacked washer and dryer," "washer and dryer INSIDE the unit," and "full-size, in-unit washer and dryer." This appears consistent across many listings and agents, not a one-off or copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
The listings generally describe in-unit washers and dryers rather than community laundry. No explicit paid-laundry wording was found.
The remarks mention in-unit washers and dryers in several listings but do not describe shared laundry facilities on every floor. No explicit evidence supports this feature.
Parking is overwhelmingly confirmed at the building level. Across the current remarks, dozens of listings mention phrases like "2 assigned parking stalls," "2 covered parking stalls," "one open parking," and "parking garage," which strongly supports that the building offers parking across units.
Assigned parking is strongly supported by both the MLS history and the remarks. Many listings explicitly state "2 ASSIGNED PARKING STALLS," "two assigned parking stalls," or "assigned parking stall conveniently located near the building," indicating this is a real building-level feature rather than a one-off agent error.
Covered parking is well supported and appears repeatedly across the remarks. Multiple listings mention "2 covered parking stalls," "one covered parking and one open parking," and direct access from the parking garage, which is consistent with the MLS history and confirms covered parking is available in the building.
The listings consistently mention assigned or covered parking, including multiple stalls, but provide no explicit deeded-parking language. Based on the absence of such language, deeded parking is treated as not indicated.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fees, monthly parking charges, parking rental, and additional parking costs. The remarks discuss assigned and guest parking but do not mention a fee.
Guest parking is supported by both historical MLS data and numerous current remarks. Several listings explicitly call out "ample guest parking," "multiple guest stalls," and even "14 guest parking stalls on the same level," suggesting this is a shared building amenity and not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist and limited-parking language requiring a waiting list. Nothing was found; the remarks instead describe assigned stalls and guest parking.
No analysis available
The remarks refer to security patrol and 24-hour security but provide no evidence of a card- or fob-based access system. This feature is not supported by the public remarks.
Security guard service is supported by multiple remarks across the listing set. At least 2 listings explicitly mention it with phrases like "on-site security patrol" and "24-hour security," which aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS amenity data (SECGUA in 7/20 listings). The evidence appears consistent across different agents, not just a single copy-paste remark.
Security patrol is directly and repeatedly supported by the public remarks. This agrees with the historical high-confidence assessment.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks for this building mention split, mini-split, or ductless AC, despite many detailed renovation descriptions; when AC is described, it is explicitly "window AC in every room," not split systems. Only 2 of 20 MLS records check the split-AC box and none back it up in text, suggesting these are agent input errors rather than real features. Taken together, the evidence strongly indicates that units in this building do not have split AC systems.
At least one listing states 'a window AC in every room' after describing upgrades, indicating that window air conditioners are present and allowed.
There is overwhelming building-level evidence for concrete construction: 20 of 20 MLS listings show CONCRE in construction_materials. The remarks do not directly say 'concrete,' but they consistently describe the same Northbrook-Melemanu condo building, and the MLS data is uniformly aligned, indicating this is not a copy-paste outlier.
Limited evidence for double-wall construction: only 3 of 20 current MLS records list DOUWAL, and none of the public remarks mention "double wall," "double-wall construction," or similar. This suggests the few checked boxes may be agent data-entry choices rather than an actual building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 3 of 20 current listings include SLAB in construction_materials, so the evidence is limited and likely reflects either partial MLS entry consistency or a subset of records. None of the public remarks explicitly mention a slab foundation, so this feature is included with moderate confidence based on MLS data only.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No substantive evidence of 'above ground' construction: only 2 of 20 MLS records checked ABOGRO and no public remarks describe the building as "above ground" or reference above-ground construction materials. Many remarks explicitly reference ground-floor units, suggesting ABOGRO is not supported by listing text.
Across 20 recent listings, there are no narrative references to brick, brick exteriors, or brick-and-mortar construction, while one listing explicitly notes 'solid concrete' construction. With just 3/20 MLS records checking BRICK and all others omitting it, the weight of evidence indicates the structure is not brick-built. The small number of BRICK selections are most consistent with copy/paste or checkbox mistakes rather than actual brick construction.
No analysis available
The listings contain no explicit short-term-rental authorization. They mention owner-occupants, investors, and general rental potential, but none of those statements confirms STR eligibility.
I searched for hotel-pool and hotel-operated rental language and found none. Because short-term rental permission is not established, hotel-pool participation is false.
The remarks do not mention any rental-pool requirement or mandatory hotel program. Since STR and hotel-pool participation are not supported, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold, ground lease, land lease, lease expiry, renewal, and extension language. No specific land-tenure expiration year was found, so the value remains unknown.
The remarks repeatedly and directly confirm VA approval and VA assumable loans across many listings. This is strong, consistent evidence that the building is VA loan approved.
I searched for statements about full insurance, comprehensive building insurance, walls-in coverage, or fully insured status. No relevant insurance language appears in the remarks, so full HOA insurance cannot be confirmed.
No analysis available
I searched for fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE, fire inspection passage, certification, and life-safety compliance language. None of the public remarks mention these items, so there is no evidence to confirm that the building has passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are strongly supported across many current listings, with explicit phrases like "breathtaking mountain views," "lush mountain views," "scenic mountain views," and "breathtaking mountain vistas." The evidence appears across multiple agents and unit types, so this is not just one isolated remark or checkbox artifact. This aligns with the previously high-confidence history that the building offers mountain-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden/greenery views are strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention 'garden views' or closely matching terms such as 'lush greenery,' 'green views,' 'trees and lawn,' and 'well-manicured lawn,' indicating the building offers units with garden-like outlooks. This appears to be a real building-level feature, not just one agent's copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are supported by both historical and current remarks. At least 2 current listings explicitly reference sunsets, including phrases like "beautiful sunrises or sunsets" and "enriching every sunset," alongside other listings describing western-facing style views and evening light. The evidence looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
The remarks describe mountain, garden, woodland, stream, and panoramic views, but none specifically mention fireworks views from the building or units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is supported primarily by MLS amenity data rather than the public remarks. Across the recent listing set, 14 of 20 listings include RESMAN, which suggests this is a commonly reported building feature. The remarks reviewed here do not explicitly say 'resident manager' or 'on-site manager,' so the evidence is moderate rather than explicit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.