Northbrook-Melemanu
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Northbrook-Melemanu
Building Overview
Northbrook-Melemanu in Mililani-Waipio; concrete 1973 building with pool and BBQ area.
About Northbrook-Melemanu
Based on MLS data, Northbrook-Melemanu is a concrete residential building located in the Mililani‑Waipio neighborhood, originally built in 1973. Unit size information is not provided in the available MLS records.
The building has one elevator and on-site amenities that include a pool, a BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. Air conditioning is provided via window units according to the listing details.
Parking is available, covered, and assigned, with additional guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS data. The management company is listed as unknown. These details are based on MLS data and should be independently verified by prospective buyers or their agents.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched all public remarks for explicit owner-occupancy numbers or descriptive statements and located no references. Owner-occupancy is unknown from the remarks, so the value is left null with low confidence; further verification (owner/manager/site visit) would be required.
Remarks confirm the building has elevator access (several listings reference 'the elevator' or units 'nearest the elevator'), but none of the public remarks specify a numeric count. Per rules, keep the existing numeric value when no explicit number appears in remarks; confidence is low due to lack of an explicit elevator count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
12 of 20 current MLS listings list OTCOEX (common area electricity) in association_fee_includes. No public remarks explicitly state 'common area electricity included'; the evidence is moderate and appears across multiple agent listings (possible copy/paste), so building likely includes common-area electric in HOA fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current MLS listings list HOTWAT (0 of 20) while 12 of 20 explicitly list WTRHTR (water heater), a strong signal that units have individual water heaters rather than building-supplied hot water. Public remarks do not mention hot water being included. Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, indicating maintenance fees do not include hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong MLS consensus: 19 of 20 current listings list SEWER as an HOA inclusion. Public remarks across listings do not mention any change or contradiction, so evidence is consistent and robust across multiple agents.
Strong MLS consensus: 19 of 20 listings list WATER as included in the association fee. Public remarks contain no statements contradicting this, and multiple agents consistently report water as an HOA inclusion, supporting high confidence.
Strong evidence across listings: 15 of 20 listings mention BBQ-related amenities. Remarks include explicit phrases such as 'BBQ area', 'BBQ areas', and 'community pool, BBQ area', indicating building-level shared grilling facilities noted by multiple agents rather than a single outlier.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks do not mention 'car wash', 'auto wash', or similar terms in any listing, and there is no historical support for a car wash amenity. Given complete absence in remarks across the dataset, the car wash amenity is omitted despite a lone MLS checkbox, which likely reflects inconsistent data entry.
Several listings reference a 'Valley Recreation Center' and a 'recreation area with pool table, chairs and shade', which functions as a community clubhouse.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence from at least 15 listings describes private lanais, balconies, patios, or yards (e.g., “large private lanai,” “private, covered lanai,” “screened-in patio,” and “spacious balcony”). These repeated, detailed remarks from multiple agents across different units indicate that the building commonly offers patio/lanai-style outdoor spaces, even if the MLS checkbox is inconsistently used.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Some ground-floor listings explicitly mention 'dual private yards', a 'shared yard', and enjoying 'views of your backyard oasis', indicating certain units have direct yard access.
No analysis available
Moderately strong evidence: 9 of 20 listings reference recreation amenities. Key phrases in remarks include 'Valley Recreational Center', 'recreation area', 'recreation space', and 'recreation deck', showing building-level shared recreation facilities confirmed across multiple listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Current MLS data shows 2 of 20 listings with STORAG in unit_features, suggesting dedicated extra storage is available with at least some units, although remarks do not detail storage lockers.
The public remarks focus on in-unit amenities, parking, pool, BBQ, and recreation areas but do not reference surfboard or board storage. With no evidence, surfboard_storage is set to false with low confidence.
No public remarks mention a tennis court (search terms like 'tennis court' or 'tennis' are absent) while historical data shows no prior confidence. Given the absence of any descriptive remarks across the listings, the tennis court amenity is omitted; the small number of MLS checkbox flags (2/20) likely reflects inconsistent agent entry rather than a true building amenity.
Reasonable evidence: 8 of 20 listings list a trash chute and at least one remark explicitly states 'This pet-friendly building is equipped with a trash chute and an elevator.' While less frequently mentioned than BBQ/recreation, direct language in remarks confirms a building-wide trash chute.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
High-confidence evidence that the building offers a pool: MLS checkbox was set on all 20 listings and current public remarks across listings explicitly reference the amenity (quotes include "large swimming pool", "community pool", and "access to the Valley Recreational Center"). Mentions are consistent across multiple agent remarks (likely copy/paste of community amenities) and corroborate the historical 20/20 MLS entries.
No analysis available
Remarks reference a community pool and Valley Recreational Center pool but never specify salt water or salt system. With no evidence, pool_salt is set to false with low confidence.
Strong, consistent evidence that some units have in-unit laundry: 20 of 20 current MLS listings include washer/dryer in inclusions and numerous remarks explicitly state phrases like "in-unit washer and dryer", "washer/dryer inside the unit", and "washer and dryer included." The mentions appear across many different listings and agents (while some copy-paste is possible), the consistency and ubiquity of the statements support a high-confidence true value.
No analysis available
I searched for terms indicating paid community laundry (coin-op, card operated, quarters, paid laundry) and found none. Remarks consistently mention in-unit washers rather than paid community laundry.
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'floor-by-floor laundry' and found no references. Multiple listings emphasize an in-unit washer/dryer instead, so there is no evidence of community laundry on every floor.
Strong evidence across listings that the building provides parking: 20/20 current MLS entries include parking features and numerous remarks state 'two parking stalls', '3 parking stalls', 'includes two dedicated parking spaces', or 'direct access from the parking garage'. Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listings, indicating building-level parking is available.
High, repeated confirmation that units include assigned parking: numerous remarks say 'assigned parking stall', 'two assigned parking stalls', or 'assigned parking located near the building', appearing across many listings (majority of current entries).
Clear evidence building offers covered parking: multiple listings explicitly state 'covered parking stall', 'two covered stalls', 'covered tandem', or 'covered parking located at the same level as the unit.' This is corroborated by MLS parking feature codes in the majority of listings.
I searched the remarks for wording that would indicate deeded/owned parking (e.g., 'deeded parking', 'included in deed') but found only 'assigned' and 'covered' stalls. That indicates reserved parking but not explicit deeded ownership, so deeded is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
Searched for phrases indicating a monthly parking fee or rental cost and found none. The remarks describe assigned/covered/guest parking but do not state any parking fee amount or monthly charge.
Moderate-to-strong evidence that guest parking exists: many public remarks mention 'guest parking', 'ample guest parking', or specific counts ('14 guest parking stalls'), and MLS flags guest parking on about half the listings, so guest parking is available at the property.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating a parking waitlist or waiting list procedures but found no such references. The remarks only reference assigned stalls and guest parking, with no waitlist information.
No analysis available
I searched for 'key card', 'fob', 'card reader', and similar electronic access terms and found none. Although security presence is mentioned, there is no evidence of card/fob access systems.
Multiple listings explicitly mention staffed security, including phrases like “on-site security patrol,” “24-hour security,” and that the building “has security patrol.” These remarks come from different units/agents and are consistent with MLS amenities where 9 of 20 listings check security guard. Together, this strongly supports that the building offers on-site security personnel as a shared amenity.
Several listings explicitly note on-site or 24-hour security and security patrol, supporting a high-confidence true for security_patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks for this building mention split, mini-split, or ductless AC, despite many detailed renovation descriptions; when AC is described, it is explicitly "window AC in every room," not split systems. Only 2 of 20 MLS records check the split-AC box and none back it up in text, suggesting these are agent input errors rather than real features. Taken together, the evidence strongly indicates that units in this building do not have split AC systems.
At least one listing states 'a window AC in every room' after describing upgrades, indicating that window air conditioners are present and allowed.
Strong evidence that the building is concrete: 20 of 20 current MLS listings list 'CONCRE' in construction_materials and at least one public remark explicitly states 'Uniquely designed condo of solid concrete.' Multiple agents consistently list concrete construction (likely not copy-paste error), so confidence is high.
Limited evidence for double-wall construction: only 3 of 20 current MLS records list DOUWAL, and none of the public remarks mention "double wall," "double-wall construction," or similar. This suggests the few checked boxes may be agent data-entry choices rather than an actual building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No substantive evidence of 'above ground' construction: only 2 of 20 MLS records checked ABOGRO and no public remarks describe the building as "above ground" or reference above-ground construction materials. Many remarks explicitly reference ground-floor units, suggesting ABOGRO is not supported by listing text.
Across 20 recent listings, there are no narrative references to brick, brick exteriors, or brick-and-mortar construction, while one listing explicitly notes 'solid concrete' construction. With just 3/20 MLS records checking BRICK and all others omitting it, the weight of evidence indicates the structure is not brick-built. The small number of BRICK selections are most consistent with copy/paste or checkbox mistakes rather than actual brick construction.
No analysis available
Searched all remarks for any short-term rental (STR) related terms and found none; the listings focus on VA approval, assigned parking, amenities, and tenant/lease notes. Absence of STR language suggests STR is not indicated in the public remarks.
I searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or hotel-managed rental language and found none. Because STRs are not indicated as allowed, there is no evidence of hotel rental pool participation.
Searched for wording like 'mandatory hotel pool' or 'required to participate' and found none across the remarks. There is no evidence that any rental-pool participation is required or mandatory.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched all remarks for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to XXXX', or a 4-digit expiry year. There is no leasehold or lease-expiry information in the public remarks, so the expiry year is unknown.
Numerous public remarks explicitly indicate the building/units are VA-approved and reference VA-assumable loans and VA loan terms. This is strong, repeated evidence in the remarks supporting VA financing availability.
I reviewed all public remarks for explicit HOA insurance language (e.g., 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', 'comprehensive building insurance') and found no references. With no explicit statement and no existing true value, this is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched all public remarks for terms like 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'passed fire inspection', 'fire safety certified', and related phrases and found none. Because there is no explicit mention and no current affirmative value, the field is set to false with medium confidence (absence likely indicates not stated publicly).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Many current public remarks for units in this building explicitly reference mountain views — phrases include "breathtaking mountain views", "scenic mountain views", and "mountain views from your 97 sq. ft. lanai." At least a dozen listings' remarks mention mountain or valley vistas, and this confirms the building offers units with mountain views despite the MLS view_descriptions checkbox showing NONE.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least three current listings explicitly describe 'garden views' (e.g., 'serene, garden views,' 'unobstructed views of the nearby garden,' and 'lovely garden views'), and several others reference views of a well-manicured lawn, shared yard, and lush greenery. This aligns with prior high-confidence data that the building offers units with garden views, so the feature remains valid even though the MLS checkbox is not being used consistently.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historical compilation showed at least two listings explicitly described sunset views. In the current remarks at least two listings again mention sunsets or evening views, quoting phrases like "beautiful sunrises or sunsets" and "enriching every sunset with spectacular hues." Evidence appears in multiple agents' remarks (not a single copy/paste), supporting inclusion of view_sunset for the building.
No analysis available
Listings describe mountain, stream, valley, pool, and garden views but never state the ability to view fireworks from the unit or building. Therefore there is no evidence supporting a fireworks view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
14 of 20 recent MLS listings include the RESMAN amenity checkbox, indicating a resident/on-site manager is commonly reported. Public remarks across these listings do not explicitly say 'resident manager' or 'live-in manager'—they mention 'on-site security patrol' or '24-hour security' instead—so the evidence is primarily the repeated MLS checkbox entries across multiple agents rather than explicit remark confirmations.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.