Nohona at Kapolei I
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Nohona at Kapolei I
Building Overview
Nohona at Kapolei I in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale, built 2010; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed, management company unknown.
About Nohona at Kapolei I
Nohona at Kapolei I is a condominium property located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 2010. Size and construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Based on MLS data, key policies for the building include a prohibition on pets and a prohibition on short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. No additional amenities or interior features are specified in the MLS excerpt supplied.
Additional details such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, lease restrictions beyond short-term rentals, and other assessments are not provided in the MLS data available here. Buyers and their agents should verify all property specifics, policies, and fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
8 of 10 current MLS listings list OTCOEX (common area electric) in association_fee_includes. Public remarks reference 'well-maintained common areas' and shared amenities (e.g., recreation pool) but do not explicitly state 'common electric included', suggesting multiple agents checked the MLS box; evidence is moderately strong but mainly implied from MLS data rather than explicit remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current MLS listings (0/9) list HOTWAT in association_fee_includes while 5/9 show WTRHTR in inclusions. Public remarks on units explicitly reference 'solar hot water' and owned PV panels, implying hot water is provided at the unit level, not via HOA fees. Given the MLS checkboxes and unit-level hot water evidence, set hot water included = false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
9 of 10 current MLS listings list SEWER in association_fee_includes. Public remarks across listings do not explicitly say 'sewer included', but the very consistent MLS checkbox usage across multiple listings provides moderately strong evidence that sewer is included in the maintenance fees.
7 of 10 current MLS listings list WATER in association_fee_includes. Remarks mention lower utility costs due to owned solar panels and reference common areas, but none explicitly say 'water included', so evidence for water being included is moderate and primarily based on MLS checkbox frequency rather than explicit agent statements.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of the provided listings mention a dog park, dog run, or pet exercise area; 1/9 current MLS listings has DGPRK checked. Listings do note the property is pet-friendly and a private yard may be suitable for pets, but there is no explicit evidence of a dedicated dog park or dog run in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of the provided listings explicitly mention a recreation room or 'rec room'; 2/9 current MLS listings show RECROO checked (low prevalence). Remarks reference a 'recreation pool' and 'Villages of Kapolei Recreation Center' but do not describe an on-site indoor recreation/game room, so evidence for a dedicated recreation room is weak and likely a checkbox inconsistency.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 5 listings' remarks mention extra storage (phrases include 'extra storage space', 'built-in shelving and extra storage space', 'built-in cabinets for bonus storage', and 'ample storage'), and 1 of 9 listings has STORAG in unit_features. Building-level storage checkbox is not checked on most MLS records, so evidence indicates storage is available in some units (or via garage storage) rather than as a widely listed building amenity; confidence is moderate (0.75).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
High-confidence evidence that the building offers a community/recreation swimming pool: 8 of 10 current MLS listings have the pool amenity checked and multiple public remarks explicitly state "recreation pool" or "community amenities include a recreation pool." Mentions appear across several different listings/agents (e.g., "Community amenities include a recreation pool", "Within walking distance to... the pool!"), indicating the pool is a shared building/community feature rather than an isolated listing claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 10 current MLS listings include 'WASHER/DRYER' in the inclusions, but none of the combined public remarks explicitly state in-unit laundry (no phrases like 'washer/dryer in unit' or 'in-unit laundry'). The evidence from MLS checkboxes strongly suggests some units have in-unit laundry, but lack of explicit remarks and possible copy/paste lowers confidence to moderate (0.80).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 9 current MLS listings include parking features (OPEN/CO/GARAGE/etc.) and remarks repeatedly reference private garages, driveway/tandem stalls and additional parking. Examples: '1 enclosed garage', 'two-car enclosed garage', and 'driveway parking.' Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and MLS checkbox data, giving high confidence that the building has parking.
Multiple agent remarks explicitly reference assigned/reserved stalls — for example, '1 additional assigned stall conveniently located right in front of the unit' and similar phrasing appears in several listings (at least 3 distinct remark blocks). Historical MLS data also indicated assigned parking on multiple listings (5/10 flagged ASSIGN), so evidence supports the building offers assigned parking.
Strong, consistent evidence across many listings: agents repeatedly mention enclosed/covered garages (examples: '1-car garage', '1 enclosed garage', 'two-car enclosed garage', 'two parking stalls'). All MLS listings historically indicated covered/garage parking and multiple agent remarks confirm it, so coverage is well-supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Guest parking is affirmed by multiple agent remarks and MLS flags: at least one remark explicitly notes 'three easily accessible guest stalls adjacent to the unit' and MLS data historically flagged guest parking on most listings (8/10), indicating the building provides guest/visitor parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Seven of nine current MLS listings list ACWIUN in the inclusions, and one remark specifically states "Air conditioning in living room & bedrooms." No public remark explicitly says "window AC" or "window unit," so the evidence is mainly from agents' MLS checkbox entries across multiple listings and appears implied rather than explicitly described in remarks.
Historical MLS data indicated concrete construction with high confidence and 3 of 10 current listings still list CONCRE in construction_materials. None of the public remarks explicitly state 'concrete' or 'reinforced concrete', so confirmation is implied by MLS checkbox data rather than remark text; evidence is mixed across agents and may reflect inconsistent checkbox use.
Although 6/9 MLS records currently have the DOUWAL checkbox, none of the public remarks mention 'double wall,' 'double-wall construction,' or similar phrasing in any listing. With no corroborating remarks and no prior confirmation, this appears to be checkbox inconsistency across agents, so double-wall construction is omitted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
A majority of current listings (7/10) list WOOFRA in construction_materials and previous confidence was Medium. Remarks frequently mention wood finishes—'wood flooring', 'engineered wood', 'custom wood accents'—which supports (but does not definitively prove) wood-frame construction; evidence appears across multiple listings but may include agent copy/paste.
Current remarks frequently describe unit locations as 'ground floor' but do not state 'above ground construction' or 'above ground materials.' Only 2/9 MLS entries had ABOGRO flagged, but no listing text corroborates it, indicating the checkbox is likely inconsistent and the building should not be marked as above-ground construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/9) include 'GARDEN' in view_descriptions while 5/9 explicitly list 'NONE'. The public remarks repeatedly describe private yards, lanai, parks, and nearby amenities but do not mention any garden or courtyard views. Given the absence across MLS checkbox data and remarks, it's very likely the building does not offer a garden view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/10) mention sunset views; view_descriptions are recorded as 'NONE' across the board and public remarks do not reference 'sunset', 'western exposure', or 'evening sun'. Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, suggesting the building does not offer sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.