
Nohona at Kapolei I
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Nohona at Kapolei I
Building Overview
Nohona at Kapolei I in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale, built 2010; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed, management company unknown.

About Nohona at Kapolei I
Nohona at Kapolei I is a condominium property located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 2010. Size and construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Based on MLS data, key policies for the building include a prohibition on pets and a prohibition on short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. No additional amenities or interior features are specified in the MLS excerpt supplied.
Additional details such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, lease restrictions beyond short-term rentals, and other assessments are not provided in the MLS data available here. Buyers and their agents should verify all property specifics, policies, and fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data indicates common area electricity is included in most listings (6/8). No public remarks in the provided listing mention building electricity being included or a recent change, so the evidence is primarily from multiple MLS listings and may reflect agents checking the box rather than explicit confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
A strong majority of current MLS listings (7/8) indicate sewer is included in HOA/maintenance fees. The supplied public remarks contain no mention of sewer; therefore the conclusion is based on consistent MLS checkbox usage across listings but lacks direct confirmation in the remarks.
Five out of eight current MLS listings list water as included in association fees. The single set of public remarks reviewed does not mention water being included, so the evidence is based on multiple MLS entries but not corroborated by agent remarks in this file.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
6 of 8 current listings have pool amenities checked and the public remarks repeatedly mention a community or recreation pool (quotes: "Community amenities include a recreation pool", "Within walking distance... & the pool!"). Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and aligns with the MLS amenity checkboxes, supporting high confidence that the building offers a swimming pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 8 current MLS listings include 'WASHER/DRYER' in the inclusions, but none of the combined public remarks explicitly mention 'washer/dryer in unit' or 'in-unit laundry.' The uniform checkbox presence across multiple listings suggests the building likely offers in-unit laundry, but the absence of explicit remarks and no prior historical confidence indicate possible agent copy/paste, so confidence is moderate (0.78).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks explicitly state assigned or reserved parking. Multiple remarks describe an enclosed 1-car or 2-car garage, tandem stalls, and driveway spaces but use generic phrasing (e.g., 'additional spot right in front', 'tandem garage and driveway parking') with no mention of assigned or deeded stalls. MLS checkboxes show some ASSIGN but agent remarks do not corroborate assignment, so there is weak evidence for assigned parking.
Multiple remarks across listings explicitly reference covered parking: '1-car garage', '2-car enclosed garage', 'enclosed garage parking space', and 'garage is EV ready'. These consistent mentions from different listings/agents provide strong evidence the building offers covered parking (garages).
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several remarks explicitly note guest/visitor stalls: 'three easily accessible guest stalls adjacent to the unit' and other listings reference 'three guest stalls' near the unit. With multiple MLS checkboxes also indicating guest parking (6/8), there is moderate-to-strong evidence that guest parking is available in the complex.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' remarks (sampled listing provided) mention concrete construction or phrases like 'reinforced concrete' or 'concrete building'. Although 2/8 MLS entries currently list CONCRE in construction_materials, the absence of any confirming remarks and lack of prior high-confidence data indicate the concrete checkbox is likely inconsistent agent input rather than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks repeatedly describe interior wood finishes (e.g., 'wood flooring', 'custom wood accents') but do not explicitly state the building is wood-frame. Given absent explicit mentions and only partial MLS checkbox support (5/8), the evidence suggests the wood-frame checkbox entries are inconsistent and not confirmed as a building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/8) include 'SUNSET' in view_descriptions while 5/8 explicitly list NONE. The provided public remarks (and other listings) mention beaches and nearby amenities but do not reference 'sunset view', 'western exposure', or similar phrases. Given the absence across multiple MLS records and remarks, and no user/site-verified claim, the building should be treated as not offering sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.