Nob Hill 3
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Nob Hill 3
Building Overview
Nob Hill 3 in Mililani-Waipio, built 1974 — pets not allowed; short-term rentals prohibited (based on available MLS data).
About Nob Hill 3
Based on MLS data, Nob Hill 3 is a residential building located in the Mililani‑Waipio neighborhood. The property was built in 1974. Size (unit count/square footage) and construction type are not specified in the available MLS records.
According to available records, pets are not allowed in the building and short-term rentals are prohibited. The management company is listed as unknown in MLS data. No specific shared amenities (such as pool, gym, or common areas) are indicated in the provided MLS information.
Additional details commonly of interest to buyers — including parking arrangements, maintenance or association fees, and specific unit-level rules — are not included in the MLS data provided. Prospective buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management and review official association documents.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy figures or descriptive phrases such as "80% owner occupied" or "majority owner occupied," but found none. The listings do not provide any percentage or occupancy mix information for the building.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator references such as "elevator," "lift," "4 elevators," or "multiple elevators," but found none. These listings describe a townhouse community with parking and yard features, but do not mention any building elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
16 of 20 current listings have OTCOEX checked, indicating common area electricity is typically included in the HOA/maintenance fee. The public remarks do not directly mention common electric, but the recurring MLS pattern across many listings suggests this is a standard building expense rather than a one-off entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listings have HOTWAT checked, while a large share include WTRHTR, which is a strong indicator that hot water is not building-supplied. Remarks mention items like a "new water heater" and unit-level water heater references, so this appears to be a genuine building pattern rather than a copy-paste MLS error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
18 of 20 current listings have SEWER included in the association fee, making this a very strong building-level feature. The public remarks are silent on sewer, but the MLS pattern is highly consistent across listings and does not look like an isolated agent mistake.
18 of 20 current listings include WATER in association_fee_includes, which strongly supports that water is covered by the HOA/maintenance fee. The remarks do not directly mention water, but the repeated MLS checkbox pattern across many listings is consistent and credible.
Evidence that the building offers BBQ/grilling facilities appears in multiple listings: at least two public remarks explicitly reference 'BBQ space' and 'option for BBQ' (lanai/patio). Additionally, 11 of 20 current MLS listings have the BBQ amenity checked, so while some agent copy/paste is possible, the explicit remarks across different listings corroborate the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the listings reference car wash facilities in the building or community. With only 2/20 MLS entries showing the code and no corroborating remarks, this appears to be unverified checkbox data rather than a confirmed building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across many listings supports patio/deck amenities in this building. Roughly 10+ remarks mention outdoor spaces directly, including 'covered lanai,' 'private lanai,' 'covered patio,' 'outdoor lanai area,' and 'recently refinished deck,' suggesting this is a common and repeatedly marketed feature rather than a one-off typo.
At least 6 listings mention walking/jogging routes—phrases found include 'walking paths', 'walking trail', and 'backyard transitions to a walking trail'. Multiple agents reference access to walking paths associated with the Mililani Town Association and the complex, providing moderate consistent evidence that the building/community offers walking/jogging paths.
No analysis available
Private yard space is very well supported by the remarks, with many listings describing fenced, gated, enclosed, or otherwise private outdoor areas. At least 10+ listings mention it in some form, and the consistency across different agents strongly confirms that some units in Nob Hill offer private yard or courtyard space.
No analysis available
Across the provided remarks, there are many references to nearby or association recreation centers, pools, and community activities, but no explicit mention of a Nob Hill building recreation area. The 5/20 MLS checkbox rate is weak support on its own and looks inconsistent with the remarks, so this feature should not be treated as confirmed for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by several independent remarks across the building, not just checkbox data. At least 3 separate listings explicitly reference storage details such as “extra storage,” “new storage shed outside,” and “storage space under the stairs,” indicating buyers can find storage options here. The repeated mentions across multiple agents make this a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple current remarks (consistent across listings) state resident access to Mililani Town Association recreation centers and pools; examples include phrases like "access to all 7 rec centers and 6 pools!" and "recreation centers offering pools". Historical MLS checkbox data also indicated pool amenity in 13 of 20 listings, so evidence is strong and corroborated across multiple agents rather than a single copy/paste instance.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported and appears consistent across the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention it, including quotes such as "Full size Washer and Dryer," "washer/dryer in unit," "laundry area with washer and dryer," and "full size washer/dryer." This looks like reliable, repeated evidence from many agents, not a one-off claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly present for this building. Multiple listings mention phrases like "2 Assigned Parking Spaces," "two parking stalls," "parking spaces located right in front of the unit," and "2 open parking spaces," which is consistent across many agents and not a copy-paste anomaly.
Assigned parking is well supported by both MLS data and public remarks. Listings repeatedly say "assigned parking stall," "two assigned parking stalls," "two side-by-side parking stalls," and "2 assigned parking spots," showing this is a standard building feature rather than a one-off unit detail.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit deeded or owned parking language, such as deeded stall or parking included in the deed. The listings consistently use assigned/open parking wording instead, which does not support deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched for parking rental costs, monthly charges, or any stated parking fee. While one listing mentions an extra stall for rent, none of the remarks provide an actual fee amount, so the monthly parking fee is unknown.
Guest parking appears to be an available building amenity. Multiple listings explicitly state "Guest Parking," "guest stall nearby," "guest parking nearby," and "lots of guest parking around the complex," confirming it across several remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist phrases like waiting list, join the list, or parking lottery. The remarks do not mention any waitlist system, so there is no evidence that one exists.
No analysis available
No analysis available
7 of 20 current MLS listings include the SECGUA checkbox indicating a security guard, but none of the public remarks contain phrases like 'security guard', '24-hour security', or 'on-site security'. Evidence is inconsistent and appears to be checkbox data possibly copied by agents rather than described in remarks, so the feature is included with low confidence pending owner/manager verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Double wall construction is checked in 14 of 20 current MLS records, giving it stronger support than the wood frame field. No public remarks explicitly mention "double wall" or "double-wall construction," so the evidence is primarily from consistent MLS material data across listings rather than agent commentary.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of 20 current MLS listings include 'SLAB' in construction_materials, but none of the combined public remarks mention concrete slab, solid concrete foundation, or similar phrasing. Given the small number of MLS checkboxes and absence of corroborating remarks or owner verification, slab foundation is possible for some units but the evidence is weak and uncertain.
No analysis available
Wood frame construction appears in 11 of 20 current MLS records, which is enough to support the feature at moderate confidence. The public remarks do not explicitly say "wood frame" or describe a construction change, so this looks like a repeated MLS listing attribute rather than remark-based verification.
While 6 of 20 MLS listings flag ABOGRO, the supplied public remarks contain no references to above-ground construction or recent changes that would indicate this feature. The available evidence comes only from MLS checkbox data and is not supported by agent remarks or firsthand verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR allowed, legal vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or hotel-style rental terms. The listings contain no such language, so there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed here.
I looked for hotel pool references such as hotel rental program, managed by hotel, or branded pool participation. None were mentioned, and because STR is not supported by the remarks, this is set to false.
I searched for mandatory hotel pool language like required participation, must rent, or cannot opt out. Nothing in the remarks suggests a mandatory rental pool, so this is set to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold language such as lease expires, ground lease ends, leasehold, or any renewal year. Nothing in the listings indicates the building is leasehold or provides a lease expiry date, so this remains unknown.
The public remarks directly and repeatedly indicate VA-related financing is relevant to this building. Several listings advertise assumable VA loans and specifically mention VA buyers. This is strong evidence that the building is VA loan approved or at least VA financing is accepted.
I searched for insurance-related phrases like "fully insured," "full insurance," "walls-in coverage," or similar HOA coverage wording, but none appeared. The remarks focus on unit condition and community amenities, not insurance coverage details.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation, fire safety certification, or passed fire inspection, and found nothing in the public remarks. There is no evidence here that the building has FLSE/pass status mentioned in listing text.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence supports garden/courtyard views in this building. About 7 of 20 current listings have GARDEN in view descriptions, while several remarks explicitly reference "lush garden views," "green area," "gorgeous grassy area," "park-like backdrop," and courtyard-adjacent settings. The pattern appears consistent across multiple agents and is not just a single copied remark.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0 of 20) mention 'sunset', 'western exposure', 'evening sun', or similar phrases. Public remarks reference lanai/yard, cool upland breezes, and outdoor spaces but contain no explicit sunset/view language; evidence across multiple agents is uniformly absent, so the building does not appear to offer documented sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox lists a resident/on-site manager on roughly 6–7 of 20 current listings, supporting prior high-confidence data that the building has a resident manager. None of the provided public remarks include phrases like "resident manager," "on-site manager," or "live-in manager," so the presence is not corroborated in remarks; however the repeated MLS amenity entries across multiple listings suggest the feature is present though buyers should verify with owner/management.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.