Nauru Tower
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Nauru Tower
Building Overview
Nauru Tower in Ala Moana-Kakaako (1990) — concrete high-rise with ocean and Diamond Head views; amenities include pool and on-site management.
About Nauru Tower
Based on MLS data, Nauru Tower is a residential high-rise located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood. The building was completed in 1990 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit count are not provided in the available MLS records.
According to available records, Nauru Tower offers ocean, Diamond Head, and sunset views. Building amenities listed in MLS data include a pool, BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. The building uses central air conditioning.
MLS data also indicates covered, assigned parking is available with additional guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the provided records. The management company is listed as Unknown in the MLS. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify current building details, policies, fees, and availability with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy percentages such as "80% owner occupied" as well as qualitative wording like "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." None of the remarks provided any owner-occupancy information. Because this is a numeric percentage field and there is no supporting evidence, the value remains unknown.
The remarks explicitly mention two dedicated elevators serving the upper-floor stack, which is the only elevator count found. However, this does not clearly state the total number of elevators in the entire building, so the value is based on partial evidence only. I searched for broader phrases like "multiple elevators" or a building-wide elevator count, but found only stack-specific references.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
Current MLS data shows ACCEN in many listings, and several remarks explicitly say “central AC” or “maintenance fee include central AC.” The consistency across listings strongly supports that the building fee includes central air conditioning.
Strong evidence across the building: current MLS data shows CABTV in many listings, and remarks explicitly state “maintenance fee include central AC, cable, internet, hot water, sewer and water” and “Utilities include ... basic Cable TV.” This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
Limited/contradictory evidence for common-area electricity being included: only 7 of 20 MLS association entries list OTCOEX and remarks include phrases like 'sub metered electricity' and generally omit common electric from the maintenance inclusions. Given the sparse MLS checkbox usage and remarks implying separate metering, common-area electricity appears not to be included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building’s fee inclusions are repeatedly described in current remarks as including “hot water,” and the MLS history shows HOTWAT in many listings. There is no WTRHTR evidence suggesting individual water heaters replace building-supplied hot water.
Current MLS data shows INTSER in many listings, and remarks explicitly state “maintenance fee include ... internet” and “Utilities include ... High Speed Internet.” This is strong, repeated evidence across listings.
No analysis available
The MLS history shows SEWER in many association_fee_includes entries, and current remarks repeatedly say “maintenance fee include ... sewer.” Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents.
Water inclusion is strongly supported by current MLS data and remarks such as “maintenance fee include ... water” and “Utilities include ... Water.” The evidence is broad and consistent across the listing set.
Very strong building-level evidence for BBQ amenities across many listings. Multiple remarks from different agents mention "BBQ area," "barbeque areas," "BBQ stations," and "BBQ grilling stations," which is consistent with the historically high MLS checkbox rate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate evidence: while fewer listings list this amenity historically (5/20), the public remarks include explicit mentions such as "car wash access" and "car wash area" in multiple remarks, indicating a shared car-wash facility is available on-site.
There is no meaningful public-remark support for a clubhouse/community center. With only 1/20 current MLS entries checking the box and no consistent remarks using "clubhouse" or "community center," this looks more like an unverified MLS entry than a confirmed amenity.
Limited/ambiguous evidence for a formal concierge service: only 2/20 current listings have the concierge amenity checked, and while remarks reference staff (e.g., 'residential staff services', 'porter cochere', 'attentive service'), none explicitly state 'concierge' or 'front desk service'. Given the lack of explicit mentions across multiple agents, there is insufficient clear evidence to mark a dedicated concierge service as present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings for this building describe unit-specific outdoor spaces, with several calling out lanai sizes such as “1,892 Sq. FT of Living Space plus a 288 SF lanai” and “1385 SF plus 150 SF lanai,” as well as phrases like “covered lanai,” “large lanai,” and “enjoy sitting on your inviting lanai.” At least 8–10 different remarks from different agents reference lanais or similar outdoor deck areas, indicating this is a consistent feature across many units rather than a copy‑pasted anomaly. This corroborates the MLS PATDEC/COVPAT data and supports that the building offers patio/deck amenities.
Moderately strong evidence across listings: historical data showed ~5/20 with WAJOPA and current remarks include explicit phrases like 'walking/jogging paths', 'walking path', and 'jogging areas' in multiple listings (examples: 'walking/jogging paths', 'walking pathing & tennis court', 'BBQ and jogging areas'). Evidence is consistent but not universal, so confidence is medium-high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is good building-level evidence for a shared recreation area or comparable amenity space. Multiple listings mention "recreation area," "recreation deck," or "recreation center," suggesting this is a real common amenity rather than a single-agent embellishment.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is mentioned in well over half of the current listing remarks, with multiple agents describing it in different ways: "one storage unit on the same floor," "private storage locker," "assigned storage locker," "large storage room," and "storage included." The evidence is consistent across many listings and appears to be genuine building/unit storage availability rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Multiple public remarks explicitly reference surfboard storage or racks. That directly confirms surfboard storage facilities are available.
Very strong and consistent evidence that the building has tennis facilities. Across many listings, agents repeatedly describe a "tennis court" or "tennis/pickleball court," matching the historically high MLS pattern and showing no sign of a one-off copy/paste error.
Trash chute is not supported by the public remarks provided here. Although many MLS entries historically checked the amenity box, the remarks themselves never explicitly reference a trash, garbage, or refuse chute, so this remains unverified from the listing text alone.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports whirlpool/hot tub/spa amenities at the building. Multiple listings independently describe "hot tub," "Jacuzzi," "whirlpool spa," and even "2 whirlpool spas," which aligns well with the historically high MLS pattern.
The pool amenity is confirmed across many listings and appears to be a consistent building feature. Public remarks repeatedly describe it as a "heated pool," "salt-water pool," or "swimming pool," often alongside other shared amenities like hot tubs, BBQ areas, and tennis/pickleball courts. This is strong, repeated evidence across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Multiple listings explicitly state the pool is heated (quotes include "heated pool", "salt-water heated pool", and "heated salt water swimming pool"). While fewer MLS checkboxes were set for HEAPOO, the repeated explicit remarks across many agents provide strong evidence that the building's pool is heated.
Several remarks directly identify the pool as salt water/salt-water heated. This is strong public-remark evidence that the building pool is salt-water.
Strong evidence that Nauru Tower offers in-unit laundry: historical MLS inclusions show washer/dryer in 18 of 20 listings, and current remarks explicitly mention it in-unit. Key phrases include "an in-unit Bosch washer/dryer" and "new W/D," which confirms the feature across multiple remarks rather than a single agent’s unchecked assumption.
No analysis available
I looked for public remarks indicating that community laundry requires payment, including terms like coin laundry, paid laundry, or card-operated machines. No such language appeared in the listings, so there is no public-remark evidence of paid community laundry.
I searched the public remarks for references to laundry being available on each floor, such as 'laundry on every floor' or 'floor laundry room,' and found nothing. The listings mention many amenities and building features, but none describe community laundry placement.
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence that Nauru Tower offers assigned parking. Across the remarks, many listings explicitly mention 'assigned parking stall,' 'assigned/covered parking stall,' 'designated parking stall,' or specific numbered stalls included with the unit. The pattern appears across multiple agents and listings, not just checkbox copy-paste.
Nauru Tower clearly offers covered parking. Numerous listings reference 'covered parking,' 'secured, covered stall,' 'secured subterranean,' 'full parking stalls at lobby level,' and garage access, with about 18+ listings supporting it. The evidence is consistent across many remarks and unit types.
The remarks repeatedly describe parking stalls as owned or separately conveyed, including explicit references to separate TMKs and fee simple parking stalls. That is strong evidence the building allows deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched for parking rental amounts, monthly fees, or additional parking cost language and found none. The listings mention assigned stalls, guest parking, and parking locations, but not a fee.
Guest parking is repeatedly advertised for Nauru Tower. The remarks include 'guest parking,' 'ample guest parking,' 'lots of guest parking,' and even '24 guest parking stalls,' appearing in many listings from different agents. This is strong building-level evidence, not an isolated mention.
The building’s parking is consistently described as secured. Multiple remarks reference a 'secured garage door,' 'secured, covered stall,' 'secure, gated complex,' and '24-hour security,' with several listings also mentioning controlled garage access. The evidence is broad and consistent across listings.
Moderate evidence that some stalls are tandem: at least four public remarks explicitly mention 'tandem' or 'tandem parking stalls' (e.g., 'secured subterranean, tandem', '2 tandem parking stalls included', 'extra: 2 tandem parking stalls'), and MLS checkbox shows TANDEM on multiple units (4/20). Evidence indicates tandem parking exists for some units but is not building-wide.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like "parking waitlist," "waiting list," or instructions to join a queue for parking, and found nothing. The remarks describe parking availability and assigned stalls, but not a waitlist process.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit card-access language such as keycard entry, fob access, or electronic door systems. The listings repeatedly mention security and secured access, but not a card/fob access system.
Strong building-level evidence that Nauru Tower has security guard service. Across many current listings, agents repeatedly mention "24 hour security," "24 hr security," "24/7 security," and "security staff," which matches the high historical MLS checkbox rate (16/20). The consistency across multiple remarks suggests this is a real shared amenity, not just copy-paste noise.
I looked for public remarks describing patrol service or a patrolled building, including wording like security patrol or roving security. The listings mention 24-hour security and secure building features, but not an active patrol service.
No analysis available
Central AC is strongly supported for Nauru Tower. Historical MLS data showed high-confidence evidence, and current remarks repeatedly confirm it in multiple listings, including explicit mentions such as "central AC," "Maintenance fee includes central AC," and "air-conditioning included in the maintenance fee." The evidence appears consistent across many agents and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears to be a stable building-level feature. Current MLS data has 15/20 listings marked CONCRE, consistent with prior high-confidence patterns (16/20 and 17/20). The remarks do not explicitly say “concrete,” but there is no evidence of a change, so the building should still be treated as concrete construction.
Double-wall construction appears in a minority of current MLS listings: 7 out of 20 are marked DOUWAL. None of the public remarks explicitly mention double-wall construction, so there is no stronger corroboration from text descriptions. This looks like a limited but current building-level data point rather than a clearly documented universal feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 20 MLS listings lists STONE in construction materials (low prevalence). None of the many public remarks describe the building as built of stone or having a stone exterior; they instead reference interior stone finishes such as "marble bathrooms," "Turkish travertine flooring," and "Limestone flooring." Evidence points to copy/paste or interior-material notes rather than true stone construction, so building-level construction_stone is unlikely.
No analysis available
Only 3 of 20 current MLS listings list 'above ground' (ABOGRO) as a construction material and there are no public-remark references to above-ground materials or recent changes. The feature is included because some listings report it, but the evidence is sparse and therefore assigned lower, implied confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR indicators such as "short-term rental allowed," "vacation rental," "NUC," or "TVU," and found none. In the absence of any public-remark evidence, STR is treated as not confirmed/likely not allowed.
I looked for hotel-pool language such as Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, hotel rental program, or hotel-managed operations, and found none. Since STR is not evidenced as allowed, hotel pool participation is also false.
I searched for language like "mandatory pool," "required to participate," or "cannot opt out" and found nothing. With no evidence of any STR or hotel pool program, mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for ground lease expiration language such as "lease expires 2050," "ground lease ends," or a renewed-through year, but no specific year appears in the remarks. Since the leasehold status is mentioned without an expiry date, the expiry year remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for VA-specific lending language such as "VA approved" or "VA loans accepted" and found none. The only financing-related note is that the building is "Lendable," which is not the same as VA approval.
The remarks directly advertise full insurance coverage at the building level. This is strong evidence for walls-in/full HOA insurance coverage, so I set the feature to true with very high confidence. No contrary language appears in the listings.
Evidence supports fire sprinklers as an actual building feature. Current MLS data shows 7 of 20 listings with FIRSPR checked, and at least one listing explicitly says, "The unit also features fire sprinklers." The remarks do not show a clear change, so this appears to be a real building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
I searched the public remarks for explicit FLSE/fire-life-safety approval language and did not find any. The only related phrase was "fire sprinklers," which indicates a safety feature but not a passed evaluation. With no direct mention, this remains unconfirmed and is set to false at low confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Very strong, consistent evidence that Nauru Tower offers ocean views in many units. Across the public remarks, dozens of listings mention 'ocean view,' 'Pacific Ocean,' 'unobstructed ocean views,' or 'front row' ocean-facing units, confirming the building has ocean-view offerings rather than a single one-off unit feature.
No analysis available
Strong evidence: many listings explicitly reference Diamond Head (e.g., "Diamond Head", "DH", "view of Diamond Head"), with repeated mentions across multiple unit remarks and agents, showing the building offers Diamond Head-view units.
There is solid evidence that some Nauru Tower units have city views. Multiple remarks mention city lights, cityscape, Honolulu city views, or views of Waikiki's urban area, indicating this is a real building-level offering and not just checkbox noise.
There is clear evidence that Nauru Tower has coastline-view units. Public remarks repeatedly cite coastline, shoreline-adjacent, and sweeping east-to-west coastal panoramas, which aligns with the MLS view descriptions and supports including this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (15-20 mentions) explicitly reference marina/harbor or Ala Wai Boat Harbor views. Mentions occur in several unit descriptions and are not limited to a single agent, indicating that marina/harbor views are offered by units in the building.
No evidence in current remarks: across the many listings there are no explicit mentions of "sunrise", "morning sun", or "eastern exposure." Listings repeatedly advertise ocean, Diamond Head and sunset views, so there is strong reason to conclude sunrise views are not a marketed building feature.
Strong evidence supports sunset views in Nauru Tower, with numerous listings calling out 'sunset views' and related western-exposure style remarks. The repeated references across different units and agents suggest this is a genuine and marketable building feature.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly say fireworks can be viewed from the unit/building, which satisfies the view requirement. This is not just proximity to fireworks; it is a direct from-unit viewing claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident-manager/on-site management is strongly supported by the current MLS pattern: 15 of 20 listings have RESMAN checked. Public remarks repeatedly mention on-site staff or management-style support, including phrases like "residential staff services," "friendly staff," and "resident support team," which is consistent across multiple listings rather than a single agent remark.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.