
Nauru Tower
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Nauru Tower
Building Overview
Nauru Tower in Ala Moana-Kakaako (1990) — concrete high-rise with ocean and Diamond Head views; amenities include pool and on-site management.

About Nauru Tower
Based on MLS data, Nauru Tower is a residential high-rise located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood. The building was completed in 1990 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit count are not provided in the available MLS records.
According to available records, Nauru Tower offers ocean, Diamond Head, and sunset views. Building amenities listed in MLS data include a pool, BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. The building uses central air conditioning.
MLS data also indicates covered, assigned parking is available with additional guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the provided records. The management company is listed as Unknown in the MLS. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify current building details, policies, fees, and availability with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for ownership-ratio clues such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or similar phrasing. Nothing in the provided remarks indicates an owner-occupancy percentage, so this remains unknown from public remarks.
The remarks directly confirm two elevators serving the building’s higher floors, which matches the current value. This is explicit public-remarks evidence, so confidence is very high.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
Central AC is repeatedly confirmed at the building level. Multiple listings mention "central AC" in the fee package, including one explicit maintenance-fee statement and another describing the unit as having central AC with 3 zones. The evidence is strong and consistent across listings.
Strong building-level evidence supports cable being included. One remark explicitly says, "Maintenance fee includes central AC, cable, internet, hot water, sewer and water," and another says utilities include "...trash and basic Cable TV." This appears consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off agent note.
Evidence for common-area electricity is weak and contradictory. Only 7 of 20 current MLS entries carry the code, while the remarks mainly reference sub-metered electricity or omit the topic entirely, so this does not look reliably established at the building level.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water inclusion is strongly supported across the listings. One remark explicitly says maintenance fees include "hot water," and another lists "Utilities include AC, High Speed Internet, Water, Hot water, Sewer and ... Cable TV." The recurring wording across multiple listings indicates this is a real building feature.
Internet inclusion is confirmed by multiple remarks. The clearest statement says maintenance fees include "internet," and another says "Utilities include AC, High Speed Internet, Water, Hot water, Sewer and ... Cable TV." This looks like building-level information, not copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
Sewer is consistently included in the maintenance fee package. Multiple remarks explicitly list "sewer" among included utilities or fees, and the MLS data also shows a strong majority of listings marked with SEWER. Evidence is highly consistent across listings.
Water inclusion is strongly confirmed by both remarks and MLS data. One remark explicitly says maintenance fees include "water," while another lists "Water" among included utilities. The pattern repeats across multiple listings, suggesting reliable building-level inclusion.
BBQ facilities are very well supported at Nauru Tower. Dozens of remarks across multiple listings mention "BBQ areas," "BBQ stations," "BBQ grilling stations," and "barbeque spaces," which matches the strong MLS signal (18/20).
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash facilities appear to exist at Nauru Tower, but they are mentioned less often than the core resort amenities. One listing explicitly includes a “car wash area,” and the current MLS data still shows the checkbox in use on a subset of listings. This is enough to support inclusion, though with lower confidence than the strongest amenities.
There is no meaningful public-remark support for a clubhouse/community center. With only 1/20 current MLS entries checking the box and no consistent remarks using "clubhouse" or "community center," this looks more like an unverified MLS entry than a confirmed amenity.
Limited/ambiguous evidence for a formal concierge service: only 2/20 current listings have the concierge amenity checked, and while remarks reference staff (e.g., 'residential staff services', 'porter cochere', 'attentive service'), none explicitly state 'concierge' or 'front desk service'. Given the lack of explicit mentions across multiple agents, there is insufficient clear evidence to mark a dedicated concierge service as present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across many listings supports patio/deck access at Nauru Tower. Multiple remarks mention "lanai," "covered lanai," "large lanai," and shared outdoor spaces such as a "garden-like picnic deck" and "dining deck and patio." This appears consistently across listings from multiple agents, not just isolated copy-paste.
Jogging/walking path amenities are supported, though less frequently than BBQ or tennis. A number of listings mention “walking/jogging paths,” “walkways,” or “walking path,” indicating a real shared amenity even if not every agent includes it. The evidence is moderate-to-strong and consistent enough to include.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no public-remarks evidence supporting a putting green at Nauru Tower. Although one MLS entry appears to have checked PUTGRE, the remarks across many listings consistently describe pool, tennis, and BBQ amenities instead, with no mention of golf practice or putting facilities. This looks like an unsupported MLS checkbox rather than a confirmed shared amenity.
There is good evidence for a shared recreation area or comparable amenity space at Nauru Tower. Several remarks refer to a "recreation area," "recreation center," or "recreation deck," and the MLS data supports this with 13/20 listings checked.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no meaningful public-remark support for a sauna at Nauru Tower. With only 1/20 MLS listings showing the amenity and no confirming remarks across many listings, this likely reflects a mistaken checkbox rather than a real building feature.
Storage is strongly supported across Nauru Tower and appears in many independently written remarks, not just a single copy-paste entry. Current listings repeatedly mention phrases like "private storage locker," "assigned storage locker on the same floor," "storage unit on the same floor," and "large storage room," with numerous listings also noting building-level storage or bike/surfboard storage. The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents, so this feature should be included.
There is strong direct evidence for surfboard storage facilities in multiple listings. The wording is explicit enough to confirm the feature for the building.
Tennis facilities are clearly present at Nauru Tower. Multiple listings describe a "tennis court," "tennis and pickleball courts," or "tennis/pickle ball court," consistent with the strong MLS support (17/20).
Trash chute appears to be a real building feature at Nauru Tower based on the MLS pattern (14/20 listings). The public remarks do not explicitly discuss it, but there is also no indication of a recent change or correction, so the feature remains supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool/hot tub/spa amenities are strongly supported at Nauru Tower. Many remarks describe "whirlpools," "hot tub(s)," "Jacuzzi," and "whirlpool spas," aligning with the strong MLS presence (15/20).
The pool amenity is strongly supported. Dozens of current remarks mention it across multiple agents and time periods, with phrases like 'saltwater pool,' 'heated pool,' 'large swimming pool,' and 'sparkling pool,' indicating this is a shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste error. Historical MLS data is also highly consistent (18/20 listings showing pool-related amenities), so confidence is very high.
The heated pool feature is clearly present and repeatedly advertised. Multiple listings explicitly use phrases like "heated pool," "heated swimming pool," and "heated salt water pool," indicating this is a real building amenity rather than checkbox noise. Evidence is consistent across several remarks and not limited to a single agent.
The pool is explicitly identified as saltwater in several listings, which is clear and repeated evidence. This aligns with the building context noting a pool.
Evidence strongly supports in-unit laundry at Nauru Tower. Historical MLS data showed washer/dryer included in 18 of 20 listings, and current remarks explicitly confirm it in multiple places, including "an in-unit Bosch washer/dryer" and "new W/D." This looks consistent across listings rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
I looked for public-realm wording indicating paid community laundry, such as coin-op, card-operated machines, or laundry fees, and did not find any. Without explicit mention in the remarks, this remains unconfirmed.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like "laundry on every floor," "laundry room on each floor," and similar floor-by-floor laundry references, but found none. Because this feature is only confirmed by public remarks, I am not inferring it from the building age or amenities.
No analysis available
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the listings, with many remarks explicitly stating "assigned parking stall," "designated parking stall," "one assigned parking stall," and unit-specific stall counts. The evidence appears consistent across many agents rather than a one-off copy-paste claim, so this feature is clearly present in the building.
Covered parking is very well supported by the remarks, which repeatedly reference garage access, covered stalls, and subterranean parking. Multiple listings mention phrases like "covered parking stall," "secured subterranean," and "easy access via Waimanu Street through a secured garage door," indicating this is a building-wide feature.
The public remarks repeatedly indicate parking is separately owned or deeded rather than merely assigned. Strong examples include stalls with separate TMK and a "fee simple" parking stall, which is consistent with deeded parking ownership.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like parking fee, monthly parking charge, stall rental, or additional parking cost, but found nothing explicit. The listings mention included stalls, guest parking, and EV charging, but no recurring parking fee.
Guest parking is clearly advertised in multiple remarks and appears repeatedly across listings from different agents. Phrases like 'ample guest parking,' 'lots of guest parking,' and '24 guest parking stalls' provide strong confirmation that guest parking is available.
Secured parking/entry is well supported by explicit references to "secured garage door," "secured subterranean," "secure building," and "private, secure, gated complex." These mentions appear across multiple listings and align with the building’s 24-hour security, making this feature strongly credible.
Moderate evidence that some stalls are tandem: at least four public remarks explicitly mention 'tandem' or 'tandem parking stalls' (e.g., 'secured subterranean, tandem', '2 tandem parking stalls included', 'extra: 2 tandem parking stalls'), and MLS checkbox shows TANDEM on multiple units (4/20). Evidence indicates tandem parking exists for some units but is not building-wide.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases such as "parking waitlist," "parking waiting list," or "join waitlist for parking" and found none. The remarks discuss guest parking and assigned stalls, but not any waitlist process.
No analysis available
I searched for card-based access terms such as key card, fob access, card reader, and keycard entry, but found no explicit mention. The remarks do reference 24-hour security, but that is not the same as a card access system.
Security guard service is strongly supported and appears to be a consistent building amenity, not a one-off agent entry. Multiple listings explicitly mention "24-hour security" or "24/7 security," and some add related wording like "security staff" and "residential staff services." The evidence is repeated across many agents and aligns with the historical MLS checkbox data.
I looked for explicit language about patrol service or roving security and found none. The listings mention 24-hour security and security staff, but that does not confirm patrol service.
No analysis available
Central AC is strongly supported for Nauru Tower. Roughly 8+ current remarks explicitly mention it, with several agents using clear building-level language such as "central AC," "maintenance fee includes central AC," and "central a/c with 3 zones," which is consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off copy-paste error. The historical MLS data was already high-confidence, and the current remarks confirm it rather than contradict it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears to be a building-level feature for Nauru Tower. The current MLS data shows 17 of 20 listings marked CONCRE, and the remarks repeatedly describe the property as a high-rise/luxury tower with no contradictory evidence. This is strong building-wide support rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Double-wall construction is not supported by the current remarks. Although 8 of 20 MLS listings carry DOUWAL, the listings consistently focus on views, amenities, and renovations without describing double-wall construction. This looks more like inconsistent MLS checkbox data than a verified building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete slab foundation is not supported by the current building-wide evidence. Just 1 of 20 listings is marked SLAB, and none of the public remarks mention a slab foundation or any construction detail that would confirm it. The feature appears to be an isolated MLS entry rather than a verified building characteristic.
Only 1 of 20 MLS listings lists STONE in construction materials (low prevalence). None of the many public remarks describe the building as built of stone or having a stone exterior; they instead reference interior stone finishes such as "marble bathrooms," "Turkish travertine flooring," and "Limestone flooring." Evidence points to copy/paste or interior-material notes rather than true stone construction, so building-level construction_stone is unlikely.
No analysis available
Only 3 of 20 current MLS listings list 'above ground' (ABOGRO) as a construction material and there are no public-remark references to above-ground materials or recent changes. The feature is included because some listings report it, but the evidence is sparse and therefore assigned lower, implied confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR indicators like "short-term rental allowed," "vacation rental allowed," "NUC," "TVU," or similar language and found none. The remarks do mention one unit being rented long-term, but that does not establish that short-term rentals are allowed.
I looked for hotel pool language such as 'hotel rental pool,' 'managed by hotel,' or branded pool programs and found nothing. Because there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this feature must remain false.
I searched for terms like 'mandatory pool,' 'required to participate,' or 'must be in rental program,' but found no such references. Since there is no evidence of STR allowance or a hotel pool program, mandatory participation is also false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for specific lease end language such as "lease expires [year]," "ground lease ends," "renewed through," or "extended to," but did not find any 4-digit expiry year. Since the building is described as leasehold in one remark, the expiry year would only apply if a specific date were provided.
I searched the public remarks for explicit phrases like "VA approved," "VA financing," or "VA loans accepted" and found none. The only financing-related language was about being "lendable," which does not confirm VA eligibility.
The public remarks repeatedly advertise 100% hurricane insurance coverage, which strongly indicates the HOA/building is fully insured. This is direct, repeated evidence rather than inference.
Fire sprinklers are explicitly mentioned in at least 1 public remark ('The unit also features fire sprinklers'), and the MLS data still shows the feature checked in 9 of 20 listings. Combined with the prior high-confidence assessment, the evidence supports this as a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
I searched the remarks for fire/life safety evaluation language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, and passed fire inspection. None was found, so there is no public-remarks evidence that the building has passed that evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported building-wide. The current remarks repeatedly mention “Pacific Ocean views,” “unobstructed ocean views,” “front-row oceanfront,” and similar phrasing across many listings, indicating this is a common building feature rather than a one-off unit trait. Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and stacks, not just copy-paste checkbox data.
No analysis available
Diamond Head views are well supported in both MLS data and remarks. About 12 of 20 current records show DIAHEA, and many remarks explicitly say “Diamond Head,” “direct Diamond Head,” or “breathtaking Diamond Head views.” The evidence is consistent across multiple stacks and agents.
City views appear to be available in a meaningful subset of units. Multiple remarks explicitly mention “city views,” “city lights at night,” and “cityscape,” alongside the historical MLS pattern showing CITY in roughly 11 of 20 records. This looks like a real building-level offering for some stacks rather than an agent error.
There is clear evidence that Nauru Tower has coastline-view units. Several listings explicitly reference “coastline,” “southern coastline,” or “Waikiki coastline,” alongside ocean and beach park views, which aligns with the historical MLS pattern. The evidence suggests this is a genuine feature available in select units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is solid evidence that some units in Nauru Tower offer marina/harbor views. Current remarks include phrases like “marina and ocean view,” “marina, and Diamond Head,” “Ala Wai Boat Harbor,” and “Harbor views,” showing this is a real but less common view type in the building. The pattern suggests a genuine feature available in select stacks rather than an MLS checkbox artifact.
Sunrise views are less consistently documented than the other views, but they are not unsupported. While only 7 of 20 current MLS records show SUNRIS and the prior summary noted little explicit mention, one remark specifically references “gorgeous Hawaiian sunrises and sunsets from Magic Island.” That suggests sunrise is possible in some units, but evidence is weaker than for ocean, Diamond Head, city, or sunset.
Sunset views are strongly supported at the building level. The remarks repeatedly mention “sunset views,” “world class sunsets,” and even “Friday night fireworks” tied to west-facing view corridors, matching the historical MLS pattern of many SUNSET references. This is consistent across multiple listings and stacks.
No analysis available
The remarks repeatedly confirm fireworks views from units, which satisfies the requirement that the view be from the building. This is strong direct evidence and appears in multiple listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident-manager/on-site management is supported by the MLS pattern, with 12 of 20 listings checked for RESMAN. Public remarks repeatedly reference on-site staff and management support—phrases like 'residential staff services,' 'very helpful management staff,' and 'exceptional resident support team'—which are consistent with a resident manager being present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.