Nanea Kai
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Nanea Kai
Building Overview
Nanea Kai in Hawaii Kai (built 2003) with mountain views and central air conditioning.
About Nanea Kai
Based on MLS data, Nanea Kai is a residential building located in the Hawaii Kai neighborhood, completed in 2003. Specifics on unit sizes and construction type are not provided in the available MLS records.
According to available records, units at Nanea Kai offer central air conditioning and mountain views. The property does not allow pets and prohibits short-term rentals. The listing does not provide details on onsite amenities beyond these features.
Parking is noted as available, covered, assigned, and there is guest parking. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, fees, and policies with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for specific indicators like '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied', or similar quantitative statements but none appear. As no explicit owner-occupancy rate is given, the percentage of owner-occupied units remains unknown.
The remarks repeatedly describe multi-story townhomes with garages and stairs but never reference any elevators or shared lift systems. Because elevator counts are only set from explicit statements and none are present, the number of elevators remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included with strong consistency across the building: 13 of 16 listings have OTCOEX in association_fee_includes. The current remarks do not explicitly spell out 'common electric,' but nothing contradicts the long-running MLS pattern, which looks consistent across multiple agent remarks and likely copy/paste listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not supported by the current evidence. MLS data shows HOTWAT in 0 of 15 listings and WTRHTR in 13 of 15, a strong indicator that units have their own water heaters instead of building-provided hot water. The remarks mentioning a new or virtually new water heater align with that interpretation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is supported by an exceptionally strong MLS pattern: 15 of 16 listings show SEWER in association_fee_includes. None of the remarks suggest a change, so this remains a high-confidence building feature rather than an agent-copy artifact.
Water is included with very high confidence: all 16 of 16 listings show WATER in association_fee_includes. The consistency across listings is stronger than typical copy/paste noise, and there is no remark evidence of a change or exception.
No listing remarks describe BBQ facilities, grilling areas, or outdoor grills. The evidence is weak and appears to come only from some MLS amenity checkboxes rather than agent commentary, so I’m treating BBQ as not verified for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence that Nanea Kai offers patio/deck-style outdoor spaces. Across the provided remarks, well over half the listings explicitly mention a lanai, patio, covered patio, or enclosed courtyard, suggesting this is a recurring community feature rather than a one-off unit upgrade. The consistency across multiple listings and agents supports keeping this feature enabled.
Several listings mention access to walking paths, with at least one explicitly saying "convenient access to walking paths." Current MLS data also has a smaller share of listings (3/16) checking a walking/jogging-path amenity, which aligns with the remarks and suggests this is a real shared feature or nearby building access point.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings mention storage-related features: phrases include 'added storage with shelving in the laundry area', 'large outdoor storage area off the lanai', 'storage closet', 'attic with extra storage', and 'one car enclosed garage includes storage cabinets.' At least several different listings (approximately 4–6) describe storage in unit or adjacent to unit, and MLS checkboxes also partially indicate storage (3/12 building amenities, 4/12 unit features), so there is consistent evidence across agents that the building offers storage options.
Public remarks describe various private storage options within units (cabinets, closets, attic, outdoor storage) but never a dedicated building surfboard or board storage facility. I searched for phrases like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and 'bike and surfboard storage' and found no matches, so this feature is likely not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched all remarks for 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', and 'saline pool' and found no references. The building is described as a 'Non-amenity building,' which strongly suggests there is no pool at all, and therefore no saltwater pool.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the current listings: MLS inclusions show washer/dryer in 16 of 16 listings, and several remarks explicitly confirm it with phrases like 'full size washer and dryer' and 'laundry closet.' The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, suggesting this is a reliable building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Remarks were searched for terms such as 'coin-op', 'coin laundry', 'card-operated', 'paid laundry', or 'laundry fee'. None appear, and the only laundry references are to private in-unit areas, so paid community laundry is assumed not to exist.
Remarks were checked for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'community laundry on every floor', or similar. Only in-unit laundry (laundry area/closet) is mentioned, with no indication of floor-by-floor community facilities, so this feature is assumed not present.
Parking is confirmed by the current remarks and historical MLS data. Multiple listings explicitly describe a garage plus an additional open or assigned stall, and no listings indicate parking is absent. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported across the listings. At least several remarks directly reference an assigned, reserved, or additional stall, and this appears consistently across multiple agents rather than a one-off description.
Covered parking is very well supported by the public remarks. Multiple listings explicitly mention garages or enclosed garages, indicating the building offers covered parking options for buyers searching this feature.
I searched for wording like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in the deed and found none. The listings consistently describe the parking as attached, assigned, open, or reserved, which is not the same as explicitly deeded parking.
No analysis available
I looked for any parking charge, monthly fee, additional parking cost, or stall rental language and found nothing. The remarks only describe the parking setup, not any separate fee.
Guest parking is weakly supported overall. The remarks do not explicitly reference guest or visitor parking, but the current MLS data shows the checkbox appearing in a minority of listings (9/16), so this is more likely an MLS-data indicator than a feature clearly documented in the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or joining a list for parking and found none. The remarks describe available stalls and garages directly, with no indication of a waitlist process.
No analysis available
Remarks describe interiors, parking, yard space, and general convenience but do not reference any card or fob-based building access system. Searched for terms like key card, fob access, card reader, and electronic entry and found no evidence, so this feature is assumed not present.
No analysis available
The comments highlight location, layout, and community qualities but never mention patrolled security or roving guards. Searched specifically for security patrol-related terms and found no evidence, so this is assumed not to exist.
No analysis available
Central air conditioning is strongly supported for Nanea Kai. The current MLS history shows 14/16 listings with ACCEN/CENAC in unit_features and 16/16 with ACCEN in inclusions, and several public remarks explicitly repeat phrases like "central AC," "central air conditioning," and "new central air conditioner." The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and appears to reflect a real building-level feature rather than a one-off agent error.
There is only limited support for split AC at Nanea Kai. Current MLS data shows ACSPL in inclusions for 2 of 16 listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly describe split, ductless, or mini-split systems, while many remarks instead reference central AC. Because the evidence is sparse and not reinforced by remarks, this remains a tentative feature rather than a confirmed one.
No analysis available
No listing remarks explicitly say the building is concrete or reinforced concrete. Although 5/15 current MLS records check CONCRE, the language across agents is generic ('newer, quality constructed') and does not verify concrete construction.
Double-wall construction is the best-supported feature here. 14 of 16 current listings list DOUWAL, and the remarks do not show any sign of a different construction type, which suggests the MLS data is consistent across listings rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Steel-frame construction has moderate support from the MLS record: 8 of 16 current listings check STEFRA. None of the public remarks explicitly mention steel framing, so this looks like a MLS-driven building attribute rather than something agents are describing in remarks.
Concrete slab construction has weaker support than the other construction features, but it still appears in 7 of 16 current MLS records. The public remarks do not mention a slab or solid concrete foundation, so this is driven entirely by MLS checkbox data rather than descriptive confirmation.
No analysis available
I found no remark language such as 'wood frame' or similar construction wording. The MLS checkbox coverage is modest (6/15), but the public remarks do not support including wood-frame construction.
Only 4 of 11 listings show ABOGRO, with no remarks referencing above-ground or elevated construction. Descriptions of fenced yards, community yard areas, and patios at grade indicate typical ground-level townhomes, so above-ground construction is unlikely to be a defining feature of this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit STR indicators such as legal short-term rental, NUC, TVU, vacation rental, or hotel-rental language and found none. Since there is no evidence in the remarks that short-term rentals are allowed, this is marked false by absence.
I searched for hotel-rental-pool references such as Hilton, Ritz, Trump, or a hotel-managed rental program and found nothing. Because there is also no evidence that STR is allowed, hotel-pool participation is marked false.
I looked for wording like mandatory hotel pool, required participation, or cannot opt out and found none. With no STR evidence and no rental-pool language, there is no basis to mark this as mandatory.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any ground lease, leasehold, lease expiration, or renewal year and found nothing. The remarks specifically describe the home as "fee-simple," which means there is no lease-expiry year to extract from these listings.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA-loan language such as "VA approved" or "VA financing accepted" and found none. The listings discuss price, layout, parking, and renovations but do not mention VA eligibility.
I looked for terms such as 'fully insured', 'full insurance coverage', 'walls-in coverage', or 'comprehensive building insurance' and found no references. Without explicit confirmation in the remarks, full building insurance coverage by the HOA cannot be assumed.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'fire safety certified', or 'passed fire inspection' and found none. In the absence of any such mentions, the building is assumed not to have a documented FLSE pass in the listing remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are strongly supported across the current remarks, with several listings explicitly describing 'mountain views' and Koko Head/Koko Crater views. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error, and it aligns with the prior high-confidence history.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden/yard/courtyard-related features are mentioned across multiple listings, not just one agent remark. At least 4-5 remarks explicitly describe outdoor garden, yard, courtyard, or landscaped areas, and the historical MLS data shows 6/16 listings with GARDEN in the view description. This looks like a real building-level offering for some units rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
Marina views are supported, but less strongly than mountain views. Only one remark explicitly states 'marina/canal and mountain views,' while the rest mainly mention nearby access to Hawaii Kai Marina or West Marina rather than an actual view, so this looks like limited but real building-level availability.
No analysis available
No listings for this building describe sunset views or western exposure, and 0/10 MLS view_descriptions include 'SUNSET' while 2/10 explicitly report 'NONE'. When views are mentioned, they consistently reference 'Koko Head/Crater' rather than sunsets, suggesting the building does not meaningfully offer sunset-view units. Given the marketing emphasis on views in several listings and the complete absence of sunset language, it is very likely that sunset views are not a feature of this property.
No analysis available
Remarks highlight views of Koko Head/Crater but do not mention any fireworks views. Searched for fireworks-related view phrases and found none, so this feature is considered not present based on current information.
No analysis available
Across the provided remarks, there are 0 explicit mentions of a resident manager, on-site manager, live-in manager, or building manager. With only 4 of 16 listings checking RESMAN and no supporting narrative detail, the evidence leans toward MLS copy/paste noise rather than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.