Nanea Kai
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Nanea Kai
Building Overview
Nanea Kai in Hawaii Kai (built 2003) with mountain views and central air conditioning.
About Nanea Kai
Based on MLS data, Nanea Kai is a residential building located in the Hawaii Kai neighborhood, completed in 2003. Specifics on unit sizes and construction type are not provided in the available MLS records.
According to available records, units at Nanea Kai offer central air conditioning and mountain views. The property does not allow pets and prohibits short-term rentals. The listing does not provide details on onsite amenities beyond these features.
Parking is noted as available, covered, assigned, and there is guest parking. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, fees, and policies with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for specific indicators like '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied', or similar quantitative statements but none appear. As no explicit owner-occupancy rate is given, the percentage of owner-occupied units remains unknown.
The remarks repeatedly describe multi-story townhomes with garages and stairs but never reference any elevators or shared lift systems. Because elevator counts are only set from explicit statements and none are present, the number of elevators remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity is included according to the OTCOEX association-fee inclusion code in 15 of 18 listings. Public remarks do not discuss this fee item, but the strong, repeated MLS pattern across many listings supports inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listing identifies hot water as included, while 15 of 18 identify a water heater (WTRHTR). One remark specifically states that the water heater is 'virtually new,' reinforcing that hot water is supplied at the unit level and is not included in maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is included in 17 of 18 listings based on the SEWER association-fee inclusion code. Public remarks do not independently mention sewer fees, but the near-universal MLS pattern across multiple listings strongly supports inclusion.
All 18 current listings identify WATER as included in the association fees. Although the public remarks do not discuss water billing, unanimous MLS coding across the building provides extremely strong support.
No listing remarks describe BBQ facilities, grilling areas, or outdoor grills. The evidence is weak and appears to come only from some MLS amenity checkboxes rather than agent commentary, so I’m treating BBQ as not verified for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 9 of 18 listings explicitly mention patio, lanai, or similar outdoor space, with repeated references across multiple listing remarks rather than relying solely on checkbox data. Key phrases include "large, sunny lanai," "400 sq. ft. patio / enclosed courtyard," and "private covered patio," strongly confirming that Nanea Kai offers patio/deck-style outdoor spaces.
Several listings mention access to walking paths, with at least one explicitly saying "convenient access to walking paths." Current MLS data also has a smaller share of listings (3/16) checking a walking/jogging-path amenity, which aligns with the remarks and suggests this is a real shared feature or nearby building access point.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 5 current listings explicitly mention storage-related features, including "added storage with shelving in the laundry area," "garage includes storage cabinets," "a large outdoor storage area off the lanai," "storage closet," and an "attic with extra storage." This corroborates the historical high-confidence determination and shows the feature is present in multiple units, even though it is generally unit-specific rather than a common building locker system.
Public remarks describe various private storage options within units (cabinets, closets, attic, outdoor storage) but never a dedicated building surfboard or board storage facility. I searched for phrases like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and 'bike and surfboard storage' and found no matches, so this feature is likely not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched all remarks for 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', and 'saline pool' and found no references. The building is described as a 'Non-amenity building,' which strongly suggests there is no pool at all, and therefore no saltwater pool.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the building: current MLS inclusions show washer/dryer in 18 of 18 listings. Public remarks from multiple listings mention a "Full size washer and dryer," storage in the laundry area, and a laundry closet, confirming this is not solely a copied checkbox.
No analysis available
Remarks were searched for terms such as 'coin-op', 'coin laundry', 'card-operated', 'paid laundry', or 'laundry fee'. None appear, and the only laundry references are to private in-unit areas, so paid community laundry is assumed not to exist.
Remarks were checked for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'community laundry on every floor', or similar. Only in-unit laundry (laundry area/closet) is mentioned, with no indication of floor-by-floor community facilities, so this feature is assumed not present.
At least 12 listings explicitly mention parking, including phrases such as "attached 1-car garage plus an additional open parking stall," "attached garage plus an additional parking stall," and "enclosed garage and an open stall." The evidence is strong across multiple listings and agents, not merely based on checkbox data.
Several listings state "one open assigned parking stall," "2nd assigned uncovered stall," or "one reserved open parking space." This directly confirms that at least some units in the building offer assigned or reserved parking.
At least 10 listings explicitly mention garages, including "private attached 2-car garage," "two-car enclosed garage," and "1 car enclosed garage." The repeated garage descriptions across multiple agents strongly confirm covered parking.
Multiple listings describe garages and assigned or open parking stalls. No remark confirms deeded parking, owned parking, or a parking stall included in the unit deed.
No analysis available
The listings describe garages and additional or assigned stalls but do not identify a separate parking fee. A parking charge is therefore not established from the public remarks.
No listing remarks use phrases such as "guest parking" or "visitor parking." The only support is the current MLS checkbox appearing in 11 of 18 listings, while the prior assessment characterized this evidence as weak, so guest parking is omitted as unverified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks discuss garages and assigned or open stalls without describing a waitlist system. Parking waitlist status is not otherwise established.
No analysis available
Remarks describe interiors, parking, yard space, and general convenience but do not reference any card or fob-based building access system. Searched for terms like key card, fob access, card reader, and electronic entry and found no evidence, so this feature is assumed not present.
No analysis available
The comments highlight location, layout, and community qualities but never mention patrolled security or roving guards. Searched specifically for security patrol-related terms and found no evidence, so this is assumed not to exist.
No analysis available
At least 7 of the 18 provided remarks explicitly mention central air or central A/C, including several independent descriptions of a new or newer system. This aligns with the very strong MLS evidence of 15/18 listings carrying ACCEN/CENAC and 18/18 carrying ACCEN, indicating the feature is consistently supported rather than merely copied in a single listing.
There is only limited support for split AC at Nanea Kai. Current MLS data shows ACSPL in inclusions for 2 of 16 listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly describe split, ductless, or mini-split systems, while many remarks instead reference central AC. Because the evidence is sparse and not reinforced by remarks, this remains a tentative feature rather than a confirmed one.
No analysis available
No listing remarks explicitly say the building is concrete or reinforced concrete. Although 5/15 current MLS records check CONCRE, the language across agents is generic ('newer, quality constructed') and does not verify concrete construction.
Double-wall construction is reported in 16 of 18 current MLS listings, making it the strongest-supported construction feature. No remarks explicitly quote “double wall” or “two walls,” but the high consistency across listings supports the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Steel-frame construction appears in 10 of 18 current MLS records. None of the 18 public remarks mention “steel frame” or provide construction details, so the evidence is based on MLS checkbox data and may partly reflect agent copy-paste.
Concrete slab construction appears in 8 of 18 current MLS records. None of the public remarks mention “concrete slab” or “solid concrete foundation,” leaving the evidence moderate and potentially influenced by inconsistent or copied MLS checkbox entries.
No analysis available
I found no remark language such as 'wood frame' or similar construction wording. The MLS checkbox coverage is modest (6/15), but the public remarks do not support including wood-frame construction.
Only 4 of 11 listings show ABOGRO, with no remarks referencing above-ground or elevated construction. Descriptions of fenced yards, community yard areas, and patios at grade indicate typical ground-level townhomes, so above-ground construction is unlikely to be a defining feature of this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks do not explicitly authorize short-term rentals or state a specific prohibition. Under the absence-of-mention rule, this is returned as false with low-to-medium confidence.
None of the listings describe participation in a hotel rental program. Because short-term rental permission is not established, the hotel-pool feature is false.
The remarks contain no language requiring owners to participate in a rental pool. Since STR and hotel-pool participation are not established, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Fee-simple ownership indicates that no ground lease expiration applies. No lease expiry, extension, renewal, or ground-lease year was found in the remarks.
The remarks were searched for explicit VA approval or financing language, but none was found. This does not confirm that VA financing is unavailable.
I looked for terms such as 'fully insured', 'full insurance coverage', 'walls-in coverage', or 'comprehensive building insurance' and found no references. Without explicit confirmation in the remarks, full building insurance coverage by the HOA cannot be assumed.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'fire safety certified', or 'passed fire inspection' and found none. In the absence of any such mentions, the building is assumed not to have a documented FLSE pass in the listing remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are strongly supported across the current listings: 11 of 18 MLS records contain MOUNTA, while multiple remarks explicitly mention "mountain views," "iconic Koko Head," and "stunning Koko Crater/Head views." Although 5 listings show NONE, the repeated detailed references across several listings and the previously high historical confidence support including this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden/yard/courtyard-related features are mentioned across multiple listings, not just one agent remark. At least 4-5 remarks explicitly describe outdoor garden, yard, courtyard, or landscaped areas, and the historical MLS data shows 6/16 listings with GARDEN in the view description. This looks like a real building-level offering for some units rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
Marina views are supported, but less strongly than mountain views. Only one remark explicitly states 'marina/canal and mountain views,' while the rest mainly mention nearby access to Hawaii Kai Marina or West Marina rather than an actual view, so this looks like limited but real building-level availability.
No analysis available
No listings for this building describe sunset views or western exposure, and 0/10 MLS view_descriptions include 'SUNSET' while 2/10 explicitly report 'NONE'. When views are mentioned, they consistently reference 'Koko Head/Crater' rather than sunsets, suggesting the building does not meaningfully offer sunset-view units. Given the marketing emphasis on views in several listings and the complete absence of sunset language, it is very likely that sunset views are not a feature of this property.
No analysis available
Remarks highlight views of Koko Head/Crater but do not mention any fireworks views. Searched for fireworks-related view phrases and found none, so this feature is considered not present based on current information.
No analysis available
Across the provided remarks, there are 0 explicit mentions of a resident manager, on-site manager, live-in manager, or building manager. With only 4 of 16 listings checking RESMAN and no supporting narrative detail, the evidence leans toward MLS copy/paste noise rather than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.