Nanea Kai
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Nanea Kai
Building Overview
Nanea Kai in Hawaii Kai (built 2003) with mountain views and central air conditioning.
About Nanea Kai
Based on MLS data, Nanea Kai is a residential building located in the Hawaii Kai neighborhood, completed in 2003. Specifics on unit sizes and construction type are not provided in the available MLS records.
According to available records, units at Nanea Kai offer central air conditioning and mountain views. The property does not allow pets and prohibits short-term rentals. The listing does not provide details on onsite amenities beyond these features.
Parking is noted as available, covered, assigned, and there is guest parking. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, fees, and policies with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for specific indicators like '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied', or similar quantitative statements but none appear. As no explicit owner-occupancy rate is given, the percentage of owner-occupied units remains unknown.
The remarks repeatedly describe multi-story townhomes with garages and stairs but never reference any elevators or shared lift systems. Because elevator counts are only set from explicit statements and none are present, the number of elevators remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included in the maintenance fee. Current MLS data shows OTCOEX in 12 of 15 listings, which is a strong and fairly consistent pattern across agents. The public remarks do not explicitly mention it, but there is no evidence against the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not supported by the current evidence. MLS data shows HOTWAT in 0 of 15 listings and WTRHTR in 13 of 15, a strong indicator that units have their own water heaters instead of building-provided hot water. The remarks mentioning a new or virtually new water heater align with that interpretation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included in the maintenance fees. MLS data shows SEWER in 14 of 15 listings, which is a very strong and consistent cross-listing signal. There are no public-remark contradictions, so this looks reliable.
Water is included in the maintenance fees with very high confidence. MLS data shows WATER in all 15 listings, making this the strongest pattern in the dataset. No remarks contradict the inclusion.
Six of 13 current MLS listings list BBQ in the amenities checkbox, but none of the public remarks describe a BBQ, grill, or grilling area. Evidence is therefore mixed: the amenity box is frequently checked across agents (possible copy/paste), but there are no explicit remarks confirming a shared BBQ facility on-site.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that Nanea Kai offers patio/deck-style outdoor spaces. At least 8 listings in the provided remarks explicitly mention a patio, lanai, covered patio, courtyard, or yard, and the language is consistent across multiple agents rather than a single copy-paste source. This supports keeping patio_deck=true with very high confidence.
Remarks in multiple listings reference "convenient access to walking paths" and "convenient access to walking paths" (mentioned at least twice), supporting that the community offers walking/jogging routes or easy access to them. While remarks do not clearly describe a dedicated internal jogging trail, historical MLS confidence was high and current remarks imply available paths, so the building is marked as offering jogging/walking path access.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings mention storage-related features: phrases include 'added storage with shelving in the laundry area', 'large outdoor storage area off the lanai', 'storage closet', 'attic with extra storage', and 'one car enclosed garage includes storage cabinets.' At least several different listings (approximately 4–6) describe storage in unit or adjacent to unit, and MLS checkboxes also partially indicate storage (3/12 building amenities, 4/12 unit features), so there is consistent evidence across agents that the building offers storage options.
Public remarks describe various private storage options within units (cabinets, closets, attic, outdoor storage) but never a dedicated building surfboard or board storage facility. I searched for phrases like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and 'bike and surfboard storage' and found no matches, so this feature is likely not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched all remarks for 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', and 'saline pool' and found no references. The building is described as a 'Non-amenity building,' which strongly suggests there is no pool at all, and therefore no saltwater pool.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the current listings: MLS inclusions show washer/dryer in 15 of 15 listings, and several remarks explicitly confirm it. Key phrases include 'Full size washer and dryer,' 'laundry closet too,' and 'laundry area,' indicating this is a consistent building feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
Remarks were searched for terms such as 'coin-op', 'coin laundry', 'card-operated', 'paid laundry', or 'laundry fee'. None appear, and the only laundry references are to private in-unit areas, so paid community laundry is assumed not to exist.
Remarks were checked for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'community laundry on every floor', or similar. Only in-unit laundry (laundry area/closet) is mentioned, with no indication of floor-by-floor community facilities, so this feature is assumed not present.
Parking is confirmed by the current remarks and historical MLS data. Multiple listings explicitly describe a garage plus an additional open or assigned stall, and no listings indicate parking is absent. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
Assigned/reserved parking is well supported across the remarks. At least 6 listings explicitly reference assigned, reserved, or additional stalls, with phrases like 'one reserved open parking space,' 'one open assigned parking stall,' and '2nd assigned uncovered stall.' The pattern is consistent across multiple listings and agents, not just a single copied description.
Covered parking is supported by many listings, with numerous explicit references to garages and enclosed garages. Phrases like "private 2-car garage" and "enclosed two-car garage" appear several times, making this a high-confidence building feature. The evidence is strong across multiple listings and consistent with current MLS data.
I searched for terms like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed and found no direct confirmation. The listings consistently mention an attached garage, open/assigned stalls, and an EV charger, but that is not the same as deeded parking.
No analysis available
I looked for any parking fee, stall rental, or added monthly parking cost and found none. The remarks describe garages and assigned stalls, but no pricing detail for parking is provided.
Guest parking is not supported by the public remarks provided. While historical MLS data showed 8/14 listings with GUEST, the remarks here do not reference visitor or guest stalls at all, so this appears more like inconsistent MLS checkbox usage than confirmed building-level evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist, joining a list, or delayed parking assignment and found nothing. The listings describe parking as attached, assigned, or available, which does not indicate a waitlist system.
No analysis available
Remarks describe interiors, parking, yard space, and general convenience but do not reference any card or fob-based building access system. Searched for terms like key card, fob access, card reader, and electronic entry and found no evidence, so this feature is assumed not present.
No analysis available
The comments highlight location, layout, and community qualities but never mention patrolled security or roving guards. Searched specifically for security patrol-related terms and found no evidence, so this is assumed not to exist.
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence across many listings supports central air conditioning at Nanea Kai. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "central AC" or "central air conditioning," including details like a Nest controller and a newly installed unit, which aligns with the existing high-confidence MLS data. This appears to be a real building-level feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Limited evidence that some units may have split (ductless) AC: 1 of 13 current MLS listings includes ACSPL in inclusions, but none of the public remarks mention "split AC", "mini-split", or "ductless". Include the feature for buyers searching for split systems, but confidence is low-to-moderate and further verification is recommended.
No analysis available
No listing remarks explicitly say the building is concrete or reinforced concrete. Although 5/15 current MLS records check CONCRE, the language across agents is generic ('newer, quality constructed') and does not verify concrete construction.
Double-wall construction is the strongest-supported construction feature here. 13/15 current MLS records list DOUWAL, matching the prior high-confidence assessment, and there is no contrary evidence in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Steel-frame construction has moderate support: 7/15 current MLS records check STEFRA, and the building-level history was already leaning that way. The remarks themselves are generic and look somewhat copy-paste, so this is supported more by MLS consistency than by explicit public description.
There are no remarks referencing a concrete slab or solid foundation. With only 6/14 MLS records indicating SLAB and no remark-level confirmation, the evidence remains too weak to treat this as a verified building feature.
No analysis available
I found no remark language such as 'wood frame' or similar construction wording. The MLS checkbox coverage is modest (6/15), but the public remarks do not support including wood-frame construction.
Only 4 of 11 listings show ABOGRO, with no remarks referencing above-ground or elevated construction. Descriptions of fenced yards, community yard areas, and patios at grade indicate typical ground-level townhomes, so above-ground construction is unlikely to be a defining feature of this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit STR language such as short-term rental allowed, NUC, TVU, or vacation rental references and found none. There is also no conflicting language suggesting STR is permitted, so the remarks do not support STR allowance.
I searched for hotel rental pool references such as hotel-managed programs, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool language, or any comparable rental-pool wording and found none. Because there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this must be false.
I looked for any indication that owners must participate in a hotel rental pool or similar rental program and found none. The remarks also do not describe any required rental arrangement, so mandatory pool participation is unsupported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold wording such as "lease expires," "ground lease ends," or any 4-digit expiry year and found nothing. The remarks instead identify the property as fee-simple, so there is no lease-expiry year to extract.
I searched the remarks for explicit VA-loan approval language and found none. The listings describe the building as fee-simple and focus on layout, upgrades, and parking, but do not indicate VA eligibility.
I looked for terms such as 'fully insured', 'full insurance coverage', 'walls-in coverage', or 'comprehensive building insurance' and found no references. Without explicit confirmation in the remarks, full building insurance coverage by the HOA cannot be assumed.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'fire safety certified', or 'passed fire inspection' and found none. In the absence of any such mentions, the building is assumed not to have a documented FLSE pass in the listing remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are strongly supported across the current remarks, with several listings explicitly describing 'mountain views' and Koko Head/Koko Crater views. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error, and it aligns with the prior high-confidence history.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least six of the combined listings explicitly reference garden/yard/courtyard features—key phrases include '400 sq. ft. patio / enclosed courtyard adorned with beautiful landscaping,' 'dreamy outdoor garden,' 'small community yard perfect for kids and pets,' and 'nice sized yard space in the back to garden.' Although current MLS view_descriptions show 0/13 with GARDEN, multiple agents' remarks consistently describe landscaped yards/courtyards, indicating the building offers garden views/features.
No analysis available
Marina views are supported, but less strongly than mountain views. Only one remark explicitly states 'marina/canal and mountain views,' while the rest mainly mention nearby access to Hawaii Kai Marina or West Marina rather than an actual view, so this looks like limited but real building-level availability.
No analysis available
No listings for this building describe sunset views or western exposure, and 0/10 MLS view_descriptions include 'SUNSET' while 2/10 explicitly report 'NONE'. When views are mentioned, they consistently reference 'Koko Head/Crater' rather than sunsets, suggesting the building does not meaningfully offer sunset-view units. Given the marketing emphasis on views in several listings and the complete absence of sunset language, it is very likely that sunset views are not a feature of this property.
No analysis available
Remarks highlight views of Koko Head/Crater but do not mention any fireworks views. Searched for fireworks-related view phrases and found none, so this feature is considered not present based on current information.
No analysis available
Historical MLS/aggregation indicated a resident/on-site manager for Nanea Kai and 3 of the 13 current listings have the RESMAN amenity checked. However, 0 of the supplied public remarks mention a resident, on-site, or live-in manager and one remark explicitly calls the complex a "Non-amenity building," suggesting agents may be copying checkbox data. Inclusion is based on prior high-confidence records and a few current listings still marking RESMAN, but absence in remarks lowers confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.