Nanea Kai
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Nanea Kai
Building Overview
Nanea Kai in Hawaii Kai (built 2003) with mountain views and central air conditioning.
About Nanea Kai
Based on MLS data, Nanea Kai is a residential building located in the Hawaii Kai neighborhood, completed in 2003. Specifics on unit sizes and construction type are not provided in the available MLS records.
According to available records, units at Nanea Kai offer central air conditioning and mountain views. The property does not allow pets and prohibits short-term rentals. The listing does not provide details on onsite amenities beyond these features.
Parking is noted as available, covered, assigned, and there is guest parking. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, fees, and policies with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for specific indicators like '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied', or similar quantitative statements but none appear. As no explicit owner-occupancy rate is given, the percentage of owner-occupied units remains unknown.
The remarks repeatedly describe multi-story townhomes with garages and stairs but never reference any elevators or shared lift systems. Because elevator counts are only set from explicit statements and none are present, the number of elevators remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox OTCOEX (common area electric) appears in 10/13 current listings, a consistent pattern across multiple agents. None of the public remarks for this building explicitly mention a change or removal of common area electricity being included; evidence is strong and consistent with prior High confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings show HOTWAT (0/12) and 11/12 list WTRHTR (water heater) in unit inclusions; public remarks mention 'water heater also virtually new' confirming water heaters are unit-level. Strong evidence that hot water is not included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox SEWER is present in 12/13 current listings, consistent across multiple agents and matching prior High confidence. Public remarks do not contradict or describe any change (e.g., 'sewer no longer included'), so the evidence supports that sewer is included in maintenance fees.
MLS checkbox WATER appears in all 13/13 current listings, a uniform and strong signal across listings and agents. Public remarks mention 'maintenance fees' being reduced but do not state water is excluded; evidence is clear that water is included in association fees.
Six of 13 current MLS listings list BBQ in the amenities checkbox, but none of the public remarks describe a BBQ, grill, or grilling area. Evidence is therefore mixed: the amenity box is frequently checked across agents (possible copy/paste), but there are no explicit remarks confirming a shared BBQ facility on-site.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence building offers patios/decks: at least 8 separate listing remarks explicitly mention outdoor spaces with phrases like "back patio," "charming lanai," "covered & tiled lanai," "private covered patio with storage closet," and a "400 sq. ft. patio / enclosed courtyard." Multiple agents describe private patios or lanais across different units rather than a single unit-only feature, indicating this is a building-level amenity available in some units.
Remarks in multiple listings reference "convenient access to walking paths" and "convenient access to walking paths" (mentioned at least twice), supporting that the community offers walking/jogging routes or easy access to them. While remarks do not clearly describe a dedicated internal jogging trail, historical MLS confidence was high and current remarks imply available paths, so the building is marked as offering jogging/walking path access.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings mention storage-related features: phrases include 'added storage with shelving in the laundry area', 'large outdoor storage area off the lanai', 'storage closet', 'attic with extra storage', and 'one car enclosed garage includes storage cabinets.' At least several different listings (approximately 4–6) describe storage in unit or adjacent to unit, and MLS checkboxes also partially indicate storage (3/12 building amenities, 4/12 unit features), so there is consistent evidence across agents that the building offers storage options.
Public remarks describe various private storage options within units (cabinets, closets, attic, outdoor storage) but never a dedicated building surfboard or board storage facility. I searched for phrases like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and 'bike and surfboard storage' and found no matches, so this feature is likely not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched all remarks for 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', and 'saline pool' and found no references. The building is described as a 'Non-amenity building,' which strongly suggests there is no pool at all, and therefore no saltwater pool.
All 13 current MLS listings list washer/dryer in the inclusions and several public remarks explicitly state in-unit laundry—quotes include "Full size washer and dryer," "laundry closet," and "added storage with shelving in the laundry area." Evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agent listings, supporting a high-confidence determination that some units in the building have in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
Remarks were searched for terms such as 'coin-op', 'coin laundry', 'card-operated', 'paid laundry', or 'laundry fee'. None appear, and the only laundry references are to private in-unit areas, so paid community laundry is assumed not to exist.
Remarks were checked for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'community laundry on every floor', or similar. Only in-unit laundry (laundry area/closet) is mentioned, with no indication of floor-by-floor community facilities, so this feature is assumed not present.
Strong evidence building has parking: multiple remarks explicitly mention 'enclosed garage', '2-car garage', '1 car enclosed garage' and 'additional/open stall'. Current MLS parking_features show parking types (OPEN/CO/GARAGE/ASSIGN) on the vast majority of listings (12/12 entries include parking-related features).
At least 5 listings explicitly reference assigned/reserved parking (phrases include "one reserved open parking space", "one open assigned parking stall", "2nd assigned uncovered stall"). Evidence appears across multiple agent remarks and units (both single assigned stall and an additional assigned uncovered stall), supporting that some units in the building have assigned parking.
Numerous listings (9+ mentions) explicitly state covered parking such as "one car enclosed garage", "two-car enclosed garage", "private 2-car garage", and "enclosed two-car garage with EV charger." Evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agent remarks indicating the building offers covered/enclosed parking for some units.
The public remarks consistently describe enclosed/attached/private garages and assigned/reserved parking stalls (e.g., 'private 2-car garage', 'attached garage', 'one car enclosed garage includes storage cabinets', 'an open assigned parking stall'). While the explicit word 'deeded' is not used, the consistent references to enclosed/attached garages and assigned stalls imply parking ownership/assignment with the unit, so we mark parking_deeded true with moderate-high confidence.
No analysis available
Searched the remarks for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking charge', 'parking rental', or similar phrases. The listings only reference included/assigned garages and stalls, with no mention of a separate parking fee, so the monthly parking fee is unknown.
Moderate evidence for guest parking: 6 out of 12 current MLS entries flag GUEST, suggesting some visitor stalls exist, but public remarks do not explicitly mention guest/visitor parking. Because MLS data indicates guest stalls but remarks are silent (possible agent copy/paste), confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for terms like 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or instructions to join a waitlist. The remarks reference assigned/reserved stalls and garages but do not mention any waitlist system, so parking_waitlist is marked false with low-medium confidence.
No analysis available
Remarks describe interiors, parking, yard space, and general convenience but do not reference any card or fob-based building access system. Searched for terms like key card, fob access, card reader, and electronic entry and found no evidence, so this feature is assumed not present.
No analysis available
The comments highlight location, layout, and community qualities but never mention patrolled security or roving guards. Searched specifically for security patrol-related terms and found no evidence, so this is assumed not to exist.
No analysis available
Strong evidence across multiple listings that the building offers central air: 11/13 listings list ACCEN/CENAC in unit_features and 13/13 list ACCEN in inclusions, and many public remarks explicitly state "central air conditioning", "central A/C", "new central air conditioner", or "Nest controller". Evidence is consistent across different agent remarks and aligns with historical MLS checkbox data.
Limited evidence that some units may have split (ductless) AC: 1 of 13 current MLS listings includes ACSPL in inclusions, but none of the public remarks mention "split AC", "mini-split", or "ductless". Include the feature for buyers searching for split systems, but confidence is low-to-moderate and further verification is recommended.
No analysis available
No analysis available
A strong MLS pattern (11/13 listings checked DOUWAL) combined with prior high-confidence building-level data indicates double-wall construction is present. Public remarks do not explicitly state 'double wall' (0 listings), but the consistency of the MLS field across many agents supports a high level of confidence that the building uses double-wall construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkboxes show STEFRA in 6/13 current listings and prior building-level data indicated high confidence for steel framing, but public remarks contain no mentions of 'steel frame' or related wording (0 listings). The pattern across multiple agent-entered listings suggests the building likely has steel-frame construction, though the absence of explicit remarks suggests moderate (implied) confidence and possible copy/paste of MLS fields.
Five of 13 current MLS listings indicate SLAB and previous building-level data showed medium confidence for a concrete slab foundation, but none of the public remarks mention 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation' (0 listings). Given mixed/limited evidence, slab foundation is included with moderate (implied) confidence based mainly on MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
No public remarks (0/12 listings) mention 'wood frame' or similar language. While 4 of 12 current MLS records list WOOFRA, there is no corroborating descriptive text and no prior confidence history, so the agent checkbox entries appear inconsistent and the evidence for wood-frame construction is weak.
Only 4 of 11 listings show ABOGRO, with no remarks referencing above-ground or elevated construction. Descriptions of fenced yards, community yard areas, and patios at grade indicate typical ground-level townhomes, so above-ground construction is unlikely to be a defining feature of this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for explicit short-term rental language (e.g., 'short-term rental allowed', 'STR permitted', 'vacation rental allowed', 'TVU', '30-day minimum' etc.). The public remarks do not reference STR permissions or prohibitions. In absence of any mention and no current value provided, we default to false with medium confidence.
I looked for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or 'managed by hotel' and found nothing. Because STR is not indicated and there is no hotel affiliation, hotel pool participation is false with high confidence.
I searched for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', and similar phrases; none were present. With no hotel pool or STR program indicated, mandatory pool participation is false with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for explicit leasehold language and 4-digit lease expiry years (e.g., 'lease expires 2050', 'land lease to 2065', 'leasehold expiring in 2040'). The remarks contain no references to a land lease or a lease expiry year, so the lease expiry is unknown.
Searched the public remarks for phrases indicating VA loan approval (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA financing', 'VA loans accepted'). There are no references to VA financing in any of the provided remarks, so we mark this as false with low-medium confidence.
I looked for terms such as 'fully insured', 'full insurance coverage', 'walls-in coverage', or 'comprehensive building insurance' and found no references. Without explicit confirmation in the remarks, full building insurance coverage by the HOA cannot be assumed.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'fire safety certified', or 'passed fire inspection' and found none. In the absence of any such mentions, the building is assumed not to have a documented FLSE pass in the listing remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple current listings explicitly advertise mountain views of Koko Head/Crater (at least 6 remarks), with phrases like "magnificent views of iconic Koko Head" and "stunning Koko Crater views." Historical MLS data already showed high confidence for mountain views and current remarks from different listings/agents consistently confirm this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least six of the combined listings explicitly reference garden/yard/courtyard features—key phrases include '400 sq. ft. patio / enclosed courtyard adorned with beautiful landscaping,' 'dreamy outdoor garden,' 'small community yard perfect for kids and pets,' and 'nice sized yard space in the back to garden.' Although current MLS view_descriptions show 0/13 with GARDEN, multiple agents' remarks consistently describe landscaped yards/courtyards, indicating the building offers garden views/features.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings for this building describe sunset views or western exposure, and 0/10 MLS view_descriptions include 'SUNSET' while 2/10 explicitly report 'NONE'. When views are mentioned, they consistently reference 'Koko Head/Crater' rather than sunsets, suggesting the building does not meaningfully offer sunset-view units. Given the marketing emphasis on views in several listings and the complete absence of sunset language, it is very likely that sunset views are not a feature of this property.
No analysis available
Remarks highlight views of Koko Head/Crater but do not mention any fireworks views. Searched for fireworks-related view phrases and found none, so this feature is considered not present based on current information.
No analysis available
Historical MLS/aggregation indicated a resident/on-site manager for Nanea Kai and 3 of the 13 current listings have the RESMAN amenity checked. However, 0 of the supplied public remarks mention a resident, on-site, or live-in manager and one remark explicitly calls the complex a "Non-amenity building," suggesting agents may be copying checkbox data. Inclusion is based on prior high-confidence records and a few current listings still marking RESMAN, but absence in remarks lowers confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.