Nalanui Hale
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Nalanui Hale
Building Overview
Nalanui Hale in Downtown-Chinatown (built 1975), concrete construction with sunset views and covered assigned parking.
About Nalanui Hale
Nalanui Hale is a residential building located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1975 using concrete construction. Unit count or building size is not provided in the MLS data.
Key features recorded in the MLS include sunset views from the building. The MLS also indicates that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted; no additional amenities or common-area features are specified in the provided data.
Parking is listed as covered and assigned. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Based on MLS data analysis, buyers should verify all details, including HOA fees, unit configuration, management, and any building rules, with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy data, including percentage figures and qualitative phrases about the resident mix. The remarks do not include any such information. Since no percentage can be supported from the text, the value is unknown.
I searched the remarks for elevator references and found one clear mention: "Amenity highlights include ... elevator." That confirms the building has elevator service, but the remarks do not state how many elevators there are. I used 1 as the minimum supported value, with moderate confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV is clearly included in the maintenance fee. All six remarks mention cable (often as 'basic cable TV' or 'basic cable/internet'), and 6/6 current MLS entries check cable, consistent with prior high-confidence data.
There is some evidence that common-area expenses are included: one listing describes the fee as covering 'common maintenance', and one MLS entry flags other common expenses. Combined with the building’s all-utilities-included structure, this reasonably implies common-area electric is covered, though it is not spelled out in most remarks.
No analysis available
Electricity is consistently advertised as part of the maintenance fee. Every remark lists electricity among included utilities and all current MLS records mark electricity included, confirming this building-wide feature.
No analysis available
None of the six remarks list hot water among the detailed, repeated descriptions of included utilities, even where they describe the fees as 'all-inclusive'. With only mixed MLS checkbox usage and no explicit marketing of hot water, it is likely not included in the maintenance fee and prior data did not indicate otherwise.
Internet is clearly included in the maintenance fee. Every listing’s remarks reference internet (often paired with basic cable), and all current MLS entries mark internet service included, reinforcing the prior high-confidence assessment.
No analysis available
Sewer charges are included in the maintenance fee. Multiple independent remarks list sewer alongside electricity, water, cable, and internet, and all current MLS records confirm sewer in the association fee includes field.
Water is a clearly advertised included utility. Several listings explicitly note water in the maintenance fee along with electricity, sewer, and cable/internet, and every current MLS entry marks water as included, confirming this building-wide feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of six public remarks explicitly states 'Amenity highlights include ... car wash area, and trash chute,' describing it among common building amenities. Two of six current MLS listings also have CRWSH checked, which aligns with the narrative description. Evidence suggests this is a genuine building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One recent listing explicitly describes building amenities including 'additional storage' along with elevator and other common facilities, indicating shared storage is offered. Although only 1 of 6 MLS entries has a storage-related amenity box checked and no remarks from other listings mention it, none contradict its existence. The clear textual description provides strong evidence that the building offers storage units or lockers for residents.
I searched for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or bike-and-surfboard storage. The listings only mention general storage, which is not enough to confirm dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
One of six public remarks clearly notes 'Amenity highlights include ... car wash area, and trash chute' as part of the building’s shared amenities. This is supported by 2/6 listings with TRACHU checked, providing consistent evidence that the building has a trash chute system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I checked for any pool references, especially salt water pool wording like saltwater, saline, or salt pool. With no pool in the building context and no pool mentioned in the remarks, this is effectively absent.
No analysis available
Multiple MLS listings for this building consistently check the community laundry amenity, and one current listing explicitly lists “community laundry” among the building’s features. No remarks suggest in-unit-only laundry or the absence of shared facilities. The combination of repeated MLS checkbox data and clear textual confirmation supports that the building offers shared/community laundry for residents.
I looked for terms indicating paid laundry such as coin laundry, coin-op, card-operated, or quarters. The remarks do not specify that laundry requires payment, so this cannot be confirmed from the listings.
I searched for language like laundry on each floor, every-floor laundry, or floor-by-floor laundry. The public remarks only list community laundry as an amenity, so there is no evidence that laundry facilities exist on every floor.
No analysis available
Multiple listings confirm that units come with a specific parking stall, with one explicitly describing '1 assigned covered parking stall.' MLS parking_features show assigned parking for 6/6 current listings, consistent with prior high-confidence data, indicating the building provides assigned/reserved stalls rather than first-come parking.
Remarks for multiple units clearly describe included covered parking stalls, and half of the current MLS entries flag covered or garage-type parking. Combined with prior high-confidence evidence, this strongly indicates the building offers covered parking stalls for at least some units.
The listings consistently show parking included and assigned, but I found no direct wording like 'deeded parking' or 'owned stall.' Because the remarks do not explicitly confirm ownership of the stall, this is set to false.
No analysis available
I searched for parking cost language such as 'parking fee,' 'parking rental,' or a monthly parking charge and found nothing. The remarks only say the unit includes one parking stall, so no separate fee can be confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for 'parking waitlist' or similar wording and found none. The public remarks indicate parking is included with the unit, with no sign of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for key card, fob, card reader, and keycard entry language. The listing directly states fob access, which is clear evidence of card/fob-based security.
No analysis available
I looked for patrol-related terms such as security patrol, roving security, or patrolled building. The remarks only reference controlled access and video surveillance, so there is no evidence of patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is consistently indicated: previously 4/4 listings, and currently 5/6 listings, mark CONCRE in construction_materials. Public remarks never mention an alternative structure, so the lone omission is likely a checkbox oversight rather than evidence of a change.
No analysis available
Hollow tile construction appears consistently: 5 of 6 current listings include HOLTIL, and prior MLS data also largely did so, with no conflicting descriptions in remarks. This pattern across multiple agents strongly supports that the building is concrete/hollow-tile construction.
Masonry/stucco appears only once (1/6 listings with MASSTU) against a long, consistent record of concrete and hollow-tile construction and no stucco/masonry references in any remarks. Given MLS copy/paste noise and the clear prevailing pattern, this is treated as an incorrect outlier rather than a building feature.
No analysis available
SLAB is checked in 1 of 6 current listings, and the building’s concrete midrise form with structured parking strongly implies a slab foundation. No remarks suggest any alternative foundation type, so this is treated as an implied feature with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR indicators such as 'short-term rental allowed,' 'NUC,' 'TVU,' or 'vacation rental' and found no supporting language. Based on the absence of any permission language, STR is marked false.
I looked for hotel pool terms such as 'hotel rental pool,' 'managed by hotel,' or branded pool programs and found nothing. Since the building does not appear to allow STRs in the remarks, hotel pool participation is false as well.
I searched for language suggesting owners must participate in a rental program, but found none. With no STR permission shown in the remarks and no mandatory program language, this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold wording such as ground lease end dates or lease expiry years, but the remarks instead identify the property as Fee Simple. That means there is no lease expiration year to report.
I searched the remarks for explicit VA-related language such as 'VA approved' or 'VA financing' and found none. With no public remark support, this remains false at low confidence.
I searched the remarks for HOA insurance language like "fully insured," "walls-in coverage," or "fully covered." There were no such references in any of the listings. Because the remarks are silent on this point, the feature is set to false with low confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit fire/life safety language such as "FLSE passed," "fire life safety evaluation passed," and similar wording. None of the provided public remarks mention this. With no evidence, this remains unsupported and is set to false with low confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across 6 listings, no agent remarks mention mountain views and 0/6 have MOUNTA in the view_descriptions (with 1/6 explicitly marked NONE). Even the rarely available top-floor corner unit highlights city skyline and sunset views instead of mountains, indicating mountain views are not a feature buyers can expect in this building.
No analysis available
1 of the 6 listings clearly states 'sweeping views of the Honolulu skyline,' confirming that some units in this building enjoy city/skyline views. Although no listings check CITY in the MLS view_descriptions, this explicit remark from a top-floor corner unit shows the building offers city-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
1 of the 6 listings highlights 'vibrant sunsets' along with skyline views, providing explicit evidence that some units enjoy sunset views. Even though SUNSET is not checked in any MLS view_descriptions, this detailed remark supports including sunset views as a building feature.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit fireworks-view language, including seeing fireworks from the lanai, unit, or building. The listings only describe city skyline and sunset views, which is not enough to confirm a fireworks view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.