Nalanui Hale
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Nalanui Hale
Building Overview
Nalanui Hale in Downtown-Chinatown (built 1975), concrete construction with sunset views and covered assigned parking.
About Nalanui Hale
Nalanui Hale is a residential building located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1975 using concrete construction. Unit count or building size is not provided in the MLS data.
Key features recorded in the MLS include sunset views from the building. The MLS also indicates that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted; no additional amenities or common-area features are specified in the provided data.
Parking is listed as covered and assigned. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Based on MLS data analysis, buyers should verify all details, including HOA fees, unit configuration, management, and any building rules, with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for numeric owner-occupancy statements and qualitative phrases such as '80% owner occupied', 'mostly owner occupied', or 'high owner occupancy'. None of the listings provide any information about how many units are owner-occupied, so the owner-occupancy rate is unknown.
I searched the remarks for terms like 'elevator', 'elevators', and 'lift'. While they clearly state there is an elevator in the building, they never specify a number, so the exact elevator count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV is clearly included in the maintenance fee. All six remarks mention cable (often as 'basic cable TV' or 'basic cable/internet'), and 6/6 current MLS entries check cable, consistent with prior high-confidence data.
There is some evidence that common-area expenses are included: one listing describes the fee as covering 'common maintenance', and one MLS entry flags other common expenses. Combined with the building’s all-utilities-included structure, this reasonably implies common-area electric is covered, though it is not spelled out in most remarks.
No analysis available
Electricity is consistently advertised as part of the maintenance fee. Every remark lists electricity among included utilities and all current MLS records mark electricity included, confirming this building-wide feature.
No analysis available
None of the six remarks list hot water among the detailed, repeated descriptions of included utilities, even where they describe the fees as 'all-inclusive'. With only mixed MLS checkbox usage and no explicit marketing of hot water, it is likely not included in the maintenance fee and prior data did not indicate otherwise.
Internet is clearly included in the maintenance fee. Every listing’s remarks reference internet (often paired with basic cable), and all current MLS entries mark internet service included, reinforcing the prior high-confidence assessment.
No analysis available
Sewer charges are included in the maintenance fee. Multiple independent remarks list sewer alongside electricity, water, cable, and internet, and all current MLS records confirm sewer in the association fee includes field.
Water is a clearly advertised included utility. Several listings explicitly note water in the maintenance fee along with electricity, sewer, and cable/internet, and every current MLS entry marks water as included, confirming this building-wide feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of six public remarks explicitly states 'Amenity highlights include ... car wash area, and trash chute,' describing it among common building amenities. Two of six current MLS listings also have CRWSH checked, which aligns with the narrative description. Evidence suggests this is a genuine building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One recent listing explicitly describes building amenities including 'additional storage' along with elevator and other common facilities, indicating shared storage is offered. Although only 1 of 6 MLS entries has a storage-related amenity box checked and no remarks from other listings mention it, none contradict its existence. The clear textual description provides strong evidence that the building offers storage units or lockers for residents.
Amenities listed include storage, elevator, community laundry, car wash area, and trash chute, but nothing about surfboard-specific storage. The lack of surf-related storage terms suggests this feature is not available.
No analysis available
One of six public remarks clearly notes 'Amenity highlights include ... car wash area, and trash chute' as part of the building’s shared amenities. This is supported by 2/6 listings with TRACHU checked, providing consistent evidence that the building has a trash chute system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Neither a pool nor a saltwater pool is mentioned anywhere in the remarks, and building data indicates there is no pool. A saltwater pool therefore cannot be present.
No analysis available
Multiple MLS listings for this building consistently check the community laundry amenity, and one current listing explicitly lists “community laundry” among the building’s features. No remarks suggest in-unit-only laundry or the absence of shared facilities. The combination of repeated MLS checkbox data and clear textual confirmation supports that the building offers shared/community laundry for residents.
While community laundry is mentioned, nothing indicates that it requires payment (e.g., coin-op, card, or fees). In the absence of such language, the paid aspect is treated as not present.
Listings confirm the presence of community laundry but provide no detail about its location by floor. There are no phrases like 'laundry on each floor' or 'on every floor,' so it is assumed not to be available on every floor.
No analysis available
Multiple listings confirm that units come with a specific parking stall, with one explicitly describing '1 assigned covered parking stall.' MLS parking_features show assigned parking for 6/6 current listings, consistent with prior high-confidence data, indicating the building provides assigned/reserved stalls rather than first-come parking.
Remarks for multiple units clearly describe included covered parking stalls, and half of the current MLS entries flag covered or garage-type parking. Combined with prior high-confidence evidence, this strongly indicates the building offers covered parking stalls for at least some units.
Listings consistently mention an assigned or included parking stall but do not state that parking is deeded. Without explicit language about ownership in the deed, deeded parking is considered not confirmed and thus marked as not present.
No analysis available
Remarks detail what the maintenance fee includes but do not reference any separate parking fee or rental cost. Because no explicit parking fee is mentioned, the presence or absence of a monthly parking fee remains unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All units referenced appear to have an assigned stall, and there is no language about a waitlist system for parking. In the absence of any mention, a parking waitlist is treated as not present.
No analysis available
Multiple remarks clearly describe fob or key-based secured entry, which matches card/fob access security. This strongly supports the presence of a card/fob access system in the building.
No analysis available
The security described is based on controlled entry and surveillance, with no indication of patrolling personnel. With no terms like 'security patrol' or 'roving security,' patrol service is considered absent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is consistently indicated: previously 4/4 listings, and currently 5/6 listings, mark CONCRE in construction_materials. Public remarks never mention an alternative structure, so the lone omission is likely a checkbox oversight rather than evidence of a change.
No analysis available
Hollow tile construction appears consistently: 5 of 6 current listings include HOLTIL, and prior MLS data also largely did so, with no conflicting descriptions in remarks. This pattern across multiple agents strongly supports that the building is concrete/hollow-tile construction.
Masonry/stucco appears only once (1/6 listings with MASSTU) against a long, consistent record of concrete and hollow-tile construction and no stucco/masonry references in any remarks. Given MLS copy/paste noise and the clear prevailing pattern, this is treated as an incorrect outlier rather than a building feature.
No analysis available
SLAB is checked in 1 of 6 current listings, and the building’s concrete midrise form with structured parking strongly implies a slab foundation. No remarks suggest any alternative foundation type, so this is treated as an implied feature with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Short-term rental permission is typically prominently advertised when available, but there are no such statements here. Given the complete lack of STR-related terms, short-term rentals are assumed not to be allowed.
There is no language suggesting participation in any hotel-operated rental program. Given the lack of STR indications, a hotel rental pool is considered not present.
The remarks do not describe any obligation to join a rental or hotel pool program. Accordingly, mandatory pool participation is treated as not applicable and set to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Because the listings clearly describe the property as 'Fee Simple', there is no ground lease involved. As a result, a lease expiry year is not applicable and is recorded as null.
Searched all remarks for indications of VA approval or VA financing terms and found none. In the absence of explicit statements, VA approval cannot be confirmed and is treated as not present.
I checked for terms like 'fully insured', 'full insurance', 'walls-in coverage', and 'comprehensive building insurance'. Since the remarks only list utilities and common maintenance in the fees and do not mention building insurance coverage, full/walls-in insurance cannot be confirmed and is treated as not present in the remarks.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases such as 'fire life safety evaluation', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', 'life safety compliant', or 'passed fire inspection'. None of the listings reference any fire or life safety evaluation, so this is assumed not documented/passed in the remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across 6 listings, no agent remarks mention mountain views and 0/6 have MOUNTA in the view_descriptions (with 1/6 explicitly marked NONE). Even the rarely available top-floor corner unit highlights city skyline and sunset views instead of mountains, indicating mountain views are not a feature buyers can expect in this building.
No analysis available
1 of the 6 listings clearly states 'sweeping views of the Honolulu skyline,' confirming that some units in this building enjoy city/skyline views. Although no listings check CITY in the MLS view_descriptions, this explicit remark from a top-floor corner unit shows the building offers city-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
1 of the 6 listings highlights 'vibrant sunsets' along with skyline views, providing explicit evidence that some units enjoy sunset views. Even though SUNSET is not checked in any MLS view_descriptions, this detailed remark supports including sunset views as a building feature.
No analysis available
Remarks discuss skyline views and sunsets but do not mention fireworks. Since fireworks views are typically highlighted when present, this feature is considered not available.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.