Nalanui Hale
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Nalanui Hale
Building Overview
Nalanui Hale in Downtown-Chinatown (built 1975), concrete construction with sunset views and covered assigned parking.
About Nalanui Hale
Nalanui Hale is a residential building located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1975 using concrete construction. Unit count or building size is not provided in the MLS data.
Key features recorded in the MLS include sunset views from the building. The MLS also indicates that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted; no additional amenities or common-area features are specified in the provided data.
Parking is listed as covered and assigned. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Based on MLS data analysis, buyers should verify all details, including HOA fees, unit configuration, management, and any building rules, with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy figures like "80% owner occupied" or descriptive phrases like "majority owner occupied," and found none. Since the remarks provide no resident-mix data, the owner-occupancy rate cannot be determined from this text.
The remarks directly confirm that the building has an elevator. No number of elevators is given, but the presence of at least one elevator is explicit and reliable from the listing text.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV is consistently listed as included in the maintenance fee. Multiple remarks say "basic cable," "basic cable/internet," or "basic cable TV," and the current MLS data shows 7/7 listings with CABTV in association_fee_includes.
There is some evidence that common-area expenses are included: one listing describes the fee as covering 'common maintenance', and one MLS entry flags other common expenses. Combined with the building’s all-utilities-included structure, this reasonably implies common-area electric is covered, though it is not spelled out in most remarks.
No analysis available
Electricity is clearly included across the building. Remarks explicitly say "Maintenance fees include electricity" and "Electricity & Basic Cable/Internet are included," matching the current MLS data showing 7/7 listings with ELECTR.
No analysis available
Hot water appears to be present in some current MLS entries, but the public remarks do not clearly describe it. Because only 4 of 7 listings have HOTWAT and the earlier remarks were silent on it, this is moderate-confidence rather than a strong consensus.
Internet is consistently advertised as included in the maintenance fee. Remarks mention "basic cable/internet" and "maintenance fees cover electricity, internet, cable," and the current MLS data shows 7/7 listings with INTSER.
No analysis available
Sewer charges are clearly included. Several remarks explicitly list sewer alongside electricity, cable, internet, and water, and the current MLS data shows 7/7 listings with SEWER.
Water is consistently included in the maintenance fee. Remarks repeatedly say "water" is included together with electricity, cable, internet, and sewer, and the current MLS data shows 7/7 listings with WATER.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of six public remarks explicitly states 'Amenity highlights include ... car wash area, and trash chute,' describing it among common building amenities. Two of six current MLS listings also have CRWSH checked, which aligns with the narrative description. Evidence suggests this is a genuine building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One recent listing explicitly describes building amenities including 'additional storage' along with elevator and other common facilities, indicating shared storage is offered. Although only 1 of 6 MLS entries has a storage-related amenity box checked and no remarks from other listings mention it, none contradict its existence. The clear textual description provides strong evidence that the building offers storage units or lockers for residents.
I searched for surfboard storage, board storage, or surf storage references. The listings only mention general storage, so there is no evidence of dedicated surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
One of six public remarks clearly notes 'Amenity highlights include ... car wash area, and trash chute' as part of the building’s shared amenities. This is supported by 2/6 listings with TRACHU checked, providing consistent evidence that the building has a trash chute system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I checked for any pool mention, especially salt-water pool wording. With the current building context showing no pool and no pool-related remarks, this feature is not present.
No analysis available
Community laundry is strongly supported for this building. One current listing explicitly says "Amenity highlights include ... community laundry," and the MLS history shows 7/7 listings with COMLAU checked. The evidence is consistent across multiple remarks and agents, so this feature should be included.
I searched for wording that would indicate paid laundry, such as coin laundry, coin-op, or card-operated machines. The public remarks do not specify any payment requirement for laundry, so this cannot be confirmed.
I looked for explicit language such as laundry on each floor, every-floor laundry, or floor-by-floor laundry. The remarks only confirm general community laundry, so there is no evidence that laundry is available on every floor.
No analysis available
Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention a specific stall, including the phrase "1 assigned covered parking stall," and the MLS data shows 7/7 listings flagged with ASSIGN. This appears consistent across agents rather than a one-off copy/paste issue.
Covered parking is confirmed by multiple remarks, including direct phrases like "1 covered parking stall" and "1 assigned covered parking stall." The MLS data also flags covered/garage parking in 4 of 7 listings, so the building clearly offers covered parking for at least some units.
I found clear evidence that parking is included and assigned, but not that it is deeded/owned with the unit. Since the remarks never use deeded-parking language, this is best treated as not confirmed.
No analysis available
I searched for any monthly parking charge, parking rental, or additional parking cost and found none. The listings consistently describe one included parking stall, so there is no evidence of a separate parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist language such as 'waitlist,' 'waiting list,' or 'join waitlist for parking' and found nothing. The remarks indicate parking is included, with no sign that parking access is waitlisted.
No analysis available
I searched for card/fob/keycard access language. The remarks directly mention fob access, which is clear evidence of a card/fob-based security system.
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to patrol service or roving security. The remarks mention secured access and video surveillance, but nothing about an actual security patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears consistently in the MLS across 6 of 7 current listings, with prior data also indicating the same. None of the public remarks explicitly mention construction materials, but there is no conflicting evidence, so the high-confidence MLS signal is persuasive.
No analysis available
Hollow tile construction is also repeatedly indicated in the MLS, appearing in 6 of 7 current listings and in earlier data as well. The public remarks do not discuss the building shell, but the repeated MLS tagging across multiple listings supports keeping this feature as true.
Masonry/stucco appears only once (1/6 listings with MASSTU) against a long, consistent record of concrete and hollow-tile construction and no stucco/masonry references in any remarks. Given MLS copy/paste noise and the clear prevailing pattern, this is treated as an incorrect outlier rather than a building feature.
No analysis available
SLAB is checked in 1 of 6 current listings, and the building’s concrete midrise form with structured parking strongly implies a slab foundation. No remarks suggest any alternative foundation type, so this is treated as an implied feature with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any indication that short-term rentals are permitted, including legal STR terms and certificate references, but found none. With no supportive language in the public remarks, STR is not evidenced here.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as hotel-managed programs or branded pool participation and found none. Because there is also no evidence that STR is allowed, this feature is false.
I searched for mandatory rental-pool wording like 'must participate,' 'cannot opt out,' or similar terms and found nothing. Since the remarks do not show STR permission or any rental-pool requirement, this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for ground-lease or leasehold wording such as an expiry year, lease end date, or renewal language. The remarks instead indicate Fee Simple ownership, so no lease expiration applies here.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA-loan approval or VA financing language and found none. Based on the available remarks, there is no evidence that the building is VA approved.
I looked for HOA insurance wording that would indicate walls-in or full building coverage, but the listings do not mention it. Maintenance fee inclusions are described, but those do not establish full insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit fire/life-safety language such as FLSE passed, passed fire inspection, or fire/life safety compliant, and found nothing. Because there is no direct mention, this remains unconfirmed and is treated as absent in the provided remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across 6 listings, no agent remarks mention mountain views and 0/6 have MOUNTA in the view_descriptions (with 1/6 explicitly marked NONE). Even the rarely available top-floor corner unit highlights city skyline and sunset views instead of mountains, indicating mountain views are not a feature buyers can expect in this building.
No analysis available
1 of the 6 listings clearly states 'sweeping views of the Honolulu skyline,' confirming that some units in this building enjoy city/skyline views. Although no listings check CITY in the MLS view_descriptions, this explicit remark from a top-floor corner unit shows the building offers city-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are supported by explicit language in 1 of the 7 public remarks, including the phrase 'vibrant sunsets' alongside skyline views. MLS data also has 1/7 listings marked SUNSET in view descriptions, while 3/7 show NONE, indicating sunset views are available in some units but not all.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit statements that units have a view of Friday night fireworks. The remarks only describe skyline and sunset views, so there is no evidence of a fireworks view from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.