Nalanui Hale
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Nalanui Hale
Building Overview
Nalanui Hale in Downtown-Chinatown (built 1975), concrete construction with sunset views and covered assigned parking.
About Nalanui Hale
Nalanui Hale is a residential building located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1975 using concrete construction. Unit count or building size is not provided in the MLS data.
Key features recorded in the MLS include sunset views from the building. The MLS also indicates that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted; no additional amenities or common-area features are specified in the provided data.
Parking is listed as covered and assigned. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Based on MLS data analysis, buyers should verify all details, including HOA fees, unit configuration, management, and any building rules, with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit percentages (e.g., '80% owner occupied') and qualitative phrases ('mostly owner occupied', 'highly owner occupied'). The remarks contain no owner-occupancy information, so the percentage cannot be determined from public remarks.
I searched the remarks for '4 elevators', 'four elevators', 'multiple elevators' and other numeric elevator mentions. The public remarks confirm an elevator exists ('Amenity highlights include ... elevator') but provide no count, so a numeric value cannot be determined from remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV is clearly included in the maintenance fee. All six remarks mention cable (often as 'basic cable TV' or 'basic cable/internet'), and 6/6 current MLS entries check cable, consistent with prior high-confidence data.
There is some evidence that common-area expenses are included: one listing describes the fee as covering 'common maintenance', and one MLS entry flags other common expenses. Combined with the building’s all-utilities-included structure, this reasonably implies common-area electric is covered, though it is not spelled out in most remarks.
No analysis available
Electricity is consistently advertised as part of the maintenance fee. Every remark lists electricity among included utilities and all current MLS records mark electricity included, confirming this building-wide feature.
No analysis available
None of the six remarks list hot water among the detailed, repeated descriptions of included utilities, even where they describe the fees as 'all-inclusive'. With only mixed MLS checkbox usage and no explicit marketing of hot water, it is likely not included in the maintenance fee and prior data did not indicate otherwise.
Internet is clearly included in the maintenance fee. Every listing’s remarks reference internet (often paired with basic cable), and all current MLS entries mark internet service included, reinforcing the prior high-confidence assessment.
No analysis available
Sewer charges are included in the maintenance fee. Multiple independent remarks list sewer alongside electricity, water, cable, and internet, and all current MLS records confirm sewer in the association fee includes field.
Water is a clearly advertised included utility. Several listings explicitly note water in the maintenance fee along with electricity, sewer, and cable/internet, and every current MLS entry marks water as included, confirming this building-wide feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of six public remarks explicitly states 'Amenity highlights include ... car wash area, and trash chute,' describing it among common building amenities. Two of six current MLS listings also have CRWSH checked, which aligns with the narrative description. Evidence suggests this is a genuine building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One recent listing explicitly describes building amenities including 'additional storage' along with elevator and other common facilities, indicating shared storage is offered. Although only 1 of 6 MLS entries has a storage-related amenity box checked and no remarks from other listings mention it, none contradict its existence. The clear textual description provides strong evidence that the building offers storage units or lockers for residents.
While the building offers additional storage, the public remarks do not specify surfboard storage or dedicated board racks. I searched for 'surfboard', 'board storage', and 'surf storage' and found no mentions.
No analysis available
One of six public remarks clearly notes 'Amenity highlights include ... car wash area, and trash chute' as part of the building’s shared amenities. This is supported by 2/6 listings with TRACHU checked, providing consistent evidence that the building has a trash chute system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no pool for the building per provided building context and no mention of a saltwater pool in the remarks, so a salt pool can be ruled out with high confidence.
No analysis available
Multiple MLS listings for this building consistently check the community laundry amenity, and one current listing explicitly lists “community laundry” among the building’s features. No remarks suggest in-unit-only laundry or the absence of shared facilities. The combination of repeated MLS checkbox data and clear textual confirmation supports that the building offers shared/community laundry for residents.
Although community laundry is mentioned, there is no indication it requires payment. I searched for terms like 'coin', 'paid', 'card', 'coin-op', and 'quarters' in the public remarks and found none.
Listings mention 'community laundry' as an amenity, but none specify that laundry facilities are located on every floor. I searched the public remarks for phrases such as 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'floor-by-floor laundry' and found no matches.
No analysis available
Multiple listings confirm that units come with a specific parking stall, with one explicitly describing '1 assigned covered parking stall.' MLS parking_features show assigned parking for 6/6 current listings, consistent with prior high-confidence data, indicating the building provides assigned/reserved stalls rather than first-come parking.
Remarks for multiple units clearly describe included covered parking stalls, and half of the current MLS entries flag covered or garage-type parking. Combined with prior high-confidence evidence, this strongly indicates the building offers covered parking stalls for at least some units.
Multiple listings mention an assigned or included parking stall but none explicitly say parking is deeded/owned. Given no explicit deeded language, set to false with low confidence.
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking rental' and similar phrases; nothing found. No numeric parking fee information available.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Looked for 'parking waitlist' or 'join waitlist' and found no reference. Because units reference assigned stalls and no waitlist is mentioned, set to false with low confidence.
No analysis available
Remarks explicitly state the building is secured with fob access (key card/fob), which satisfies the 'security_card' feature. This is direct language indicating card/fob access.
No analysis available
Security is described as controlled entry and video surveillance; there is no reference to patrol personnel or a roving security service. I searched for words like 'patrol', 'roving', and 'security patrol' and found none.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is consistently indicated: previously 4/4 listings, and currently 5/6 listings, mark CONCRE in construction_materials. Public remarks never mention an alternative structure, so the lone omission is likely a checkbox oversight rather than evidence of a change.
No analysis available
Hollow tile construction appears consistently: 5 of 6 current listings include HOLTIL, and prior MLS data also largely did so, with no conflicting descriptions in remarks. This pattern across multiple agents strongly supports that the building is concrete/hollow-tile construction.
Masonry/stucco appears only once (1/6 listings with MASSTU) against a long, consistent record of concrete and hollow-tile construction and no stucco/masonry references in any remarks. Given MLS copy/paste noise and the clear prevailing pattern, this is treated as an incorrect outlier rather than a building feature.
No analysis available
SLAB is checked in 1 of 6 current listings, and the building’s concrete midrise form with structured parking strongly implies a slab foundation. No remarks suggest any alternative foundation type, so this is treated as an implied feature with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'short-term rental', 'vacation rental', 'STR', 'NUC', '30-day minimum' etc. and found no indications that STRs are allowed. In absence of explicit allowance, set to false with medium confidence.
Because public remarks contain no reference to hotel rental pools or hotel management and STRs are not indicated, this is set to false with high confidence.
There is no language suggesting mandatory participation in any rental program; therefore mandatory pool participation is false with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings explicitly state 'Fee Simple', indicating this is not a leasehold property; therefore a lease expiry year is not applicable.
Searched the public remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. In absence of explicit statement that the building is VA-approved, set to false with medium confidence.
I searched the remarks for terms like 'fully insured', 'full insurance', 'walls-in coverage', and 'comprehensive building insurance'. The public remarks do not state that the HOA provides walls-in or full building insurance.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases such as 'fire life safety evaluation', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', 'life safety compliant', and 'passed fire inspection'. There are no references to a passed fire/life safety evaluation in the public remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across 6 listings, no agent remarks mention mountain views and 0/6 have MOUNTA in the view_descriptions (with 1/6 explicitly marked NONE). Even the rarely available top-floor corner unit highlights city skyline and sunset views instead of mountains, indicating mountain views are not a feature buyers can expect in this building.
No analysis available
1 of the 6 listings clearly states 'sweeping views of the Honolulu skyline,' confirming that some units in this building enjoy city/skyline views. Although no listings check CITY in the MLS view_descriptions, this explicit remark from a top-floor corner unit shows the building offers city-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
1 of the 6 listings highlights 'vibrant sunsets' along with skyline views, providing explicit evidence that some units enjoy sunset views. Even though SUNSET is not checked in any MLS view_descriptions, this detailed remark supports including sunset views as a building feature.
No analysis available
Remarks describe skyline views and sunsets but do not reference watching fireworks from the lanai, unit, or building. I looked for phrases such as 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from', or 'see fireworks from' and found no matches.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.