Nahele at Hoopili
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Nahele at Hoopili
Building Overview
Nahele at Hoopili in Ewa — 2023 concrete construction with mountain views, pool, BBQ area, and resident manager.
About Nahele at Hoopili
Nahele at Hoopili is a condominium building located in the Ewa neighborhood. According to available records, the building was completed in 2023 and is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count are not provided in the MLS data available for this summary.
Based on MLS data, building amenities include a pool, a BBQ area, and a resident manager. Units offer split-system air conditioning and the building has one elevator. Mountain views are noted in the listing information.
Parking is available, covered, and assigned, with guest parking also indicated. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS information provided. Management company details and any association fees were not specified in the available data. Buyers should verify all details with the listing agent or management, as this summary is based solely on MLS data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for numeric owner-occupancy figures such as '80% owner occupied' and qualitative hints like 'mostly owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied.' The remarks contain none of that information, so the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown.
The remarks provide explicit, repeated evidence that Nahele has elevator service in the building(s). Because the listings clearly describe the property as an elevator building, the current value of 1 is contradicted and should be updated to 4 as the best representation from the remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included at the building level. Across the current listing set, 17 of 20 listings show OTCOEX, which is a strong and consistent pattern across multiple agents/listings. No remarks suggest this feature was removed or changed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not supported as a maintenance-fee inclusion in the current listing set. Only 1 of 20 listings includes HOTWAT, while 19 of 20 instead show WTRHTR, a strong indicator that hot water is unit-supplied rather than provided by the building. The pattern is consistent across listings and appears stronger than any isolated checkbox entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included on some listings, but the signal is only moderate. About 6 of 20 current MLS records include SEWER, and the public remarks do not explicitly confirm or deny it. This may reflect incomplete or inconsistent agent input, so confidence is lower than for the common-area electricity field.
Water appears to be included in association fees for some Nahele at Ho'opili listings. The current MLS data shows WATER checked in 5 of 20 listings (previously 6 of 20), but none of the public remarks explicitly mention 'water included' or similar language. This suggests moderate building-level evidence, likely from MLS input rather than repeated remark confirmation.
BBQ/grilling appears in the remarks only indirectly, most clearly in the phrase "like to grill outdoors." Combined with current MLS data showing BBQ in 13/20 listings, this is a moderate-confidence amenity rather than a universally repeated feature. The evidence looks partially copy-paste driven across listings, so I would keep it but not treat it as perfectly verified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Clubhouse/community-center style amenities are supported by repeated references to the SoHo Community Center and Rec Center. While the exact word "clubhouse" is not always used, the community center/rec center language is a strong equivalent and aligns with the MLS checkbox history. This appears to be a shared community amenity rather than an isolated unit feature.
No analysis available
Dog park access is overwhelmingly supported. The remarks repeatedly list "dog park"/"dog parks" alongside other community amenities, and the MLS data shows 19/20 listings with DGPRK. This is one of the strongest amenities in the dataset and should definitely remain included.
No analysis available
There is no substantive mention of an on-site exercise room or gym in the public remarks while multiple listings call out outdoor workout parks and nearby commercial gyms. Only 1/20 MLS listings currently check an exercise-room amenity, suggesting the checkbox was likely misused; evidence indicates the building does not offer a shared indoor exercise room.
No analysis available
Meeting-room support is explicit: remarks mention both "meeting room" and "meeting space" tied to the SoHo Community Center. That matches the MLS history showing 4/20 listings with MEEROO, so this is a legitimate shared amenity. The repetition across listings suggests more than one agent independently referencing the same facility.
Strong evidence across the current remarks consistently describes outdoor spaces: many listings state "covered lanai", "private lanai", "covered patio balcony" or "covered tiled patio balcony" (appearing in numerous unit listings, including ground-floor units with "private yard"). This confirms the building offers patios/decks/covered lanais as a common feature across units rather than isolated or copy-pasted claims.
There is no direct jogging-path language in the remarks, only broader references to parks, landscaping, and outdoor fitness/workout areas. Given the prior confidence was only medium and the current remarks do not explicitly support a walking/jogging path, this appears to be an over-inferred MLS amenity. I would treat this as not verified.
No analysis available
Private yard space is mentioned across several listings, including phrases like 'private yard,' 'Gated Yard & Covered Lanai,' and 'ground-floor, corner unit ... with a spacious living area and private yard.' The evidence is repeated by multiple remarks and aligns with the current MLS PRIYAR amenity, so confidence is very high that some units in the building offer private yard space.
No analysis available
Recreation-area amenities are strongly supported across the listings. The remarks reference "recreation centers," "rec center," "party room," and similar shared amenity spaces, matching the strong MLS signal of 14/20 listings with RECARE. This looks like a genuine building/community-level amenity.
Multiple listings reference shared recreation-room-type amenities, most explicitly through the SoHo Community Center's "party room" and "meeting room." The evidence is repeated across many remarks rather than a single agent note, so this looks like a real building/community amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for surfboard-specific storage terms like surfboard storage, board storage, or surf storage. The remarks mention bike storage and bike racks, but nothing about surfboard storage.
Tennis court access is explicitly supported in the remarks, including phrases like "pickleball/tennis court" and "tennis facilities." Historical MLS data also shows 5/20 listings with TENCOU, so this is a real building/community amenity even if not every listing mentions it. The wording appears in multiple remarks, suggesting genuine support rather than a single agent’s copy-paste.
Trash chute access is explicitly mentioned multiple times in the remarks, often together with secured entry and other building amenities. The MLS data is also strong at 16/20 listings with TRACHU, so this is a well-supported shared building feature. This looks consistent across listings rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool evidence is overwhelming across the current remarks and matches the existing MLS history. Dozens of listings mention it directly, including phrases like "community pool," "large pool," "rec center w/ pool," and "SoHo Community Center for all its wonderful amenities including: a large pool." This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit salt-pool wording such as "salt water pool" or "saltwater pool." The listings only mention a community pool, with no indication that it is saltwater.
In-unit laundry is overwhelmingly supported by the remarks: dozens of listings explicitly say "washer and dryer in unit," "full-size washer/dryer," or brand-name washer/dryer packages such as Whirlpool. This is consistent across multiple agents and repeated listing templates, so the evidence looks strong rather than accidental copy-paste noise. Historical MLS data also matches this exactly, with 20/20 listings including washer/dryer.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit paid-laundry language such as coin laundry, coin-op, quarters, card-operated machines, or laundry fees. The remarks consistently reference in-unit washer/dryer instead, so there is no evidence of paid community laundry.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like "laundry on every floor," "laundry room on each floor," or similar community-laundry wording. The listings only mention in-unit washer/dryer, which does not indicate a shared laundry facility on each floor.
Parking is strongly confirmed across the building. Multiple remarks explicitly reference parking availability in varied forms, including '2 pkg stalls in front of the lobby,' 'ample street parking,' '1-parking condo,' and 'one car garage/driveway 2nd stall.' This appears consistent across many agents and is not just a copied checkbox.
Assigned/reserved parking is clearly offered in this building. The public remarks include multiple explicit confirmations such as 'two assigned parking spaces,' 'assigned parking stall is close to entrance,' and 'two assigned parking spaces (tandem).' The evidence is strong and repeated across many listings, suggesting a real building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
Covered parking is strongly supported for Nahele at Ho'opili. Numerous remarks explicitly describe garages and detached one-car garages, plus some units with driveway stalls in addition to the garage. This is repeated across multiple listings and agents, indicating a genuine covered-parking offering in the building.
I looked for explicit public-remark language such as deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The listings consistently describe assigned or designated stalls and garages, which suggests parking assignment rather than deeded ownership, so there is no evidence to mark it deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee, monthly parking charge, rental fee, or any extra cost tied to parking. The remarks only mention parking availability and stall counts, not a separate parking fee, so this is unknown from the text.
Moderate evidence for guest parking: 11 of 20 MLS listings flag guest parking and multiple remarks reference 'guest stalls' or 'additional guest parking'. Mentions are present but not as ubiquitous as assigned parking, giving medium confidence.
No analysis available
Tandem parking is present at the building, though not for every unit. The remarks include multiple explicit tandem references across listings, alongside MLS data where 6 of 20 listings flag TANDEM, indicating consistent building-level availability rather than a one-off error. Some other listings mention garages or two stalls without specifying tandem, so tandem appears to apply only to certain units.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like parking waitlist, waiting list, or join the waitlist for parking. Nothing in the listings indicates a waitlist system, and the parking is described as assigned or designated instead.
No analysis available
There is strong public-remarks evidence for card/fob-based access security. Multiple listings consistently describe secured entry, secured lobby, and key-fob access, which supports a building-level electronic access system.
No analysis available
I looked for wording that would indicate patrol service, such as security patrol, roving security, or a patrolled building. The remarks mention secured entry, key-fob access, and a security panel, but not patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is strongly confirmed across Nahele at Ho'opili listings. Dozens of current remarks from multiple listings and agents explicitly mention split A/C, often in detailed forms like "split A/C in every room," "three split A/C systems," and "Every room is equipped with a split AC unit." This looks consistent and not like a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the remarks and MLS data. Dozens of listings use consistent phrases like 'concrete masonry block wall' and 'concrete masonry accent wall,' which appears to be repeated boilerplate rather than a one-off comment. The current MLS data showing CONCRE in 9/20 listings is consistent with this being a real building feature.
Double-wall construction is strongly supported by the MLS pattern and is not contradicted by the remarks. While the public remarks do not usually say 'double wall' verbatim, they repeatedly mention concrete masonry block/accent walls across many listings, and the feature appears in the vast majority of recent MLS records.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not contain any explicit steel-frame references. Across the listings, the construction language is overwhelmingly about concrete masonry block walls, not steel framing. The limited MLS steel-frame checkbox appearances are not supported by the public remarks.
There is no meaningful remark-based support for slab construction in the listings reviewed. With only 2 of 20 MLS records checked and no explicit references to a concrete slab foundation, this feature appears to be absent or at least not reliably reported for the building.
No analysis available
Wood frame construction is not explicitly supported in the public remarks; across the provided listings there are 0 clear mentions of 'wood frame' or 'wood frame construction.' The remarks repeatedly emphasize concrete masonry block/wall details, suggesting the wood-frame checkbox is probably inconsistent copy/paste data rather than a verified building characteristic.
Strong, consistent evidence across listings: numerous remarks state the development is made up of 'four- and five-story condominiums' and repeatedly reference 'ground floor' or 'ground level' units. This confirms the buildings are above ground (no indication of subterranean residential levels).
Brick construction is not supported by the remarks. The repeated boilerplate instead highlights concrete masonry block walls and similar concrete features, which conflicts with a brick interpretation. The sparse MLS brick checkboxes look unverified and likely erroneous.
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators including STR permitted, NUC, TVU, vacation rental, and minimum-stay rules. The remarks contain no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, so the safest reading from the public text is false.
I looked for hotel pool references such as hotel-managed, rental pool, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or similar. None were found, and because STR is not supported in the remarks, this is definitively false.
I searched for mandatory participation wording like must join, cannot opt out, or required rental program. There is no hotel pool reference at all, so mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like leasehold, ground lease, lease expires, renewed through, or lease expiry year. The listings describe new construction and amenities, but they do not state any land tenure or expiration year, so this remains unknown.
Public remarks repeatedly confirm VA eligibility for this building. The evidence is direct and consistent across multiple listings, including explicit VA approved language and an assumable VA loan mention.
I looked for insurance-related wording that would indicate the HOA provides full building coverage or walls-in insurance. The remarks do not discuss insurance at all, so there is no evidence to confirm that the building is fully insured.
Fire sprinkler coverage appears to be a real building feature at Nahele at Ho'opili. The current MLS dataset shows FIRSPR in 17 of 20 listings, which is strong and consistent across multiple listings despite remarks not calling it out. This looks like reliable MLS-level data rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
I searched the public remarks for explicit fire/life safety language, including FLSE, fire inspection, and life safety compliance. Nothing in the listings indicates the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation, so there is no evidence to mark this true.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are well supported across Nahele at Ho'opili. Roughly 6+ remarks explicitly mention them, including phrases like "covered lanai with mountain views," "mountain & sunset views," and "incredible mountain and Kapolei skyline views." The pattern appears consistent across multiple agents, not just copy-paste MLS checkbox data.
One listing explicitly mentions 'Diamond Head in the backdrop.' Because this is a single occurrence (possible agent-specific remark) the evidence is limited—buyers should know at least some units may have Diamond Head views, but confidence is moderate.
Several current listings explicitly mention city-oriented views, especially "Kapolei skyline views" and "views of the mountains and City of Kapolei." While the MLS checkbox appears limited, the remarks repeatedly confirm city views from multiple units, indicating this is a real feature available in the building.
No analysis available
Several listings (multiple agent remarks — at least 3–4 separate listings) reference courtyard/garden or landscaped views with phrases like 'ground floor courtyard unit', 'peaceful greenery views', and 'beautifully landscaped surroundings'. This recurring language across listings supports high confidence that the building offers garden/courtyard views for some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise views are weakly supported at the building level: the current MLS data shows SUNRIS in 3/20 listings, but the remarks provided do not explicitly mention 'sunrise,' 'morning sun,' or eastern exposure. Most remarks instead reference mountain, sunset, greenery, or city views, so this looks like a feature present in only a few units and not broadly described by agents.
Sunset views are mentioned in several listings, not just one, with wording such as "mountain and sunset views" and "perfect for ... unwinding at sunset." The MLS view field currently does not show SUNSET in any of the sampled listings, so this looks like a case where the remarks are more reliable than the checkbox data. Because the mentions are repeated across multiple listings, the feature should be included for buyers searching for sunset-view units.
No analysis available
I searched for direct references to viewing Friday night fireworks from the building, unit, or lanai. The remarks mention mountain, city, Diamond Head, sunset, and tree-lined views, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is evidence that Nahele at Ho'opili has resident or on-site management. While only 8 of 20 MLS listings check RESMAN, one public remark explicitly mentions "on-site management," which is the key corroborating detail. This suggests the amenity exists, though the MLS checkbox is not uniformly applied.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.