Nahele at Hoopili
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Nahele at Hoopili
Building Overview
Nahele at Hoopili in Ewa — 2023 concrete construction with mountain views, pool, BBQ area, and resident manager.
About Nahele at Hoopili
Nahele at Hoopili is a condominium building located in the Ewa neighborhood. According to available records, the building was completed in 2023 and is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count are not provided in the MLS data available for this summary.
Based on MLS data, building amenities include a pool, a BBQ area, and a resident manager. Units offer split-system air conditioning and the building has one elevator. Mountain views are noted in the listing information.
Parking is available, covered, and assigned, with guest parking also indicated. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS information provided. Management company details and any association fees were not specified in the available data. Buyers should verify all details with the listing agent or management, as this summary is based solely on MLS data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for numeric ownership percentages and phrases like "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." The remarks do not provide any owner-occupancy information, so this cannot be determined from the listing text. No reliable value is available from the remarks.
I found repeated references to elevator access and to the property being an elevator building, which supports that elevators are present. However, I did not find any explicit count like "2 elevators" or "multiple elevators," so the current value of 1 is retained. No evidence in the remarks was strong enough to change the numeric value.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included at the building level. Current MLS data is very strong, with 16 of 20 listings showing OTCOEX, while remarks across many listings reference common building systems like elevators, lobby, bike storage, and landscaped common areas. This looks like a reliable building feature rather than a one-off agent copy/paste item.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is very likely not included in the maintenance fee. The MLS pattern is especially strong here: zero listings show HOTWAT, and 18 of 20 show WTRHTR, a strong indicator that each unit has its own water heater. No public remarks contradict this or describe building-supplied hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included on some listings, but the signal is only moderate. About 6 of 20 current MLS records include SEWER, and the public remarks do not explicitly confirm or deny it. This may reflect incomplete or inconsistent agent input, so confidence is lower than for the common-area electricity field.
Water appears to be included for at least some units in this building. Current MLS data shows WATER in 6 of 20 listings, but the remarks do not explicitly state it, so the evidence is moderate rather than definitive. This could reflect inconsistent checkbox usage across agents.
BBQ/grilling is referenced in remarks (notably private yard areas noted as 'convenient for... those who like to grill outdoors') and 11/20 MLS entries mark BBQ amenities. The evidence suggests buyers can expect grilling opportunities (often private-yard or outdoor), though there is limited explicit language about formal communal BBQ facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Agents repeatedly refer to the SoHo Community Center or Rec Center ('SoHo Community Center', 'Rec Center w/ Pool & Party Venues') offering party rooms and large pool access. These consistent multi-listing remarks plus MLS checkbox support indicate a clubhouse/community center is available to residents.
No analysis available
Dog-park access is mentioned repeatedly across many listings, often verbatim as "dog park" or "dog parks." The references are consistent across multiple agents and align with the historical MLS data, making this a very strong building/community feature.
No analysis available
There is no substantive mention of an on-site exercise room or gym in the public remarks while multiple listings call out outdoor workout parks and nearby commercial gyms. Only 1/20 MLS listings currently check an exercise-room amenity, suggesting the checkbox was likely misused; evidence indicates the building does not offer a shared indoor exercise room.
No analysis available
Meeting/conference space is called out in listings (phrases like 'meeting room' and 'meeting space' tied to the SoHo Community Center) and multiple MLS entries mark meeting-room amenities. The cross-listing mentions indicate residents have access to community meeting facilities.
Strong evidence across the current remarks consistently describes outdoor spaces: many listings state "covered lanai", "private lanai", "covered patio balcony" or "covered tiled patio balcony" (appearing in numerous unit listings, including ground-floor units with "private yard"). This confirms the building offers patios/decks/covered lanais as a common feature across units rather than isolated or copy-pasted claims.
Moderate evidence from multiple listings: while explicit 'jogging path' wording is uncommon, numerous remarks mention outdoor fitness parks, walking/outdoor workout areas, and landscaped open spaces suitable for walking/running. This pattern across several listings supports inclusion of a walking/jogging path or similar fitness trail, but the language is more implied than explicitly named, so confidence is set at a medium level.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is supported by many listings, with repeated references to "rec center," "recreation centers," and community amenity spaces like the SoHo Community Center. The consistency across numerous remarks suggests a true shared recreation area for the building/community.
Multiple listings reference shared recreation-room-type amenities, most explicitly through the SoHo Community Center's "party room" and "meeting room." The evidence is repeated across many remarks rather than a single agent note, so this looks like a real building/community amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or bike-and-surf storage. The remarks do mention bike storage/racks, but nothing about surfboard storage facilities.
Tennis (and pickleball) courts are mentioned explicitly in several remarks—phrases include 'pickleball/tennis court' and 'tennis facilities'—and 7/20 MLS listings list tennis amenities. Remarks consistently tie these courts to the community/SoHo recreation facilities, providing strong multi-listing confirmation.
Trash chute/garbage chute is referenced in building feature lists and some remarks (e.g., 'trash chute', 'trash/recycling') and 16/20 MLS entries mark this amenity. The strong, repeated checklist and remarks across listings support including trash-chute as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool evidence is extremely strong across the listing remarks. Multiple listings explicitly mention a pool or community pool, including descriptions of the SoHo Community Center and Ho'opili amenities; this appears consistent across many agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error. Current remarks align with the historical MLS checkbox data, so the building should be treated as having a swimming pool.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for salt-water pool language such as "salt water pool" or "saline pool." The remarks only say the community has a pool, without specifying that it is salt water.
Laundry in unit is strongly supported across the remarks: well over 20 listings explicitly mention washer/dryer in the unit. The language is consistent across many separate listings and agents, including details like "full-size washer & dryer," "in-unit washer and dryer," and "Whirlpool washer/dryer," so this does not look like a copy-paste error to omit.
No analysis available
I looked for public remarks mentioning paid community laundry such as coin laundry, coin-op, card-operated machines, quarters, or laundry fees. There were no such references; the remarks instead emphasize in-unit washer/dryer appliances.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar wording, but found none. The listings repeatedly describe in-unit washer and dryer instead, which does not indicate community laundry facilities on every floor.
Parking is strongly confirmed across the building. All 20 current MLS listings indicate parking features, and the remarks repeatedly reference garages, assigned stalls, tandem parking, driveway stalls, and guest parking. The evidence is consistent across many listings and appears to reflect the building’s standard offering rather than a copy-paste error.
High-confidence evidence assigned/reserved parking is offered: 16 of 20 MLS listings flag ASSIGN and many public remarks explicitly reference 'assigned parking stall' or 'two assigned parking spaces (tandem)'. This language appears in multiple listings across agents.
Multiple listings and remarks explicitly describe covered parking (garages/detached one-car garages): 9 of 20 MLS listings flag covered/garage and numerous public remarks refer to garages and 'covered' parking stalls, supporting that covered parking is available in the building.
I looked for deeded, owned, or parking included in deed language and found none. The listings describe assigned/designated parking and garages, which suggests parking exists, but not that it is deeded with the unit.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee, monthly parking charge, parking rent, and similar cost language, but found no mention. The remarks discuss assigned stalls and garages, but do not provide any separate parking cost.
Moderate evidence for guest parking: 11 of 20 MLS listings flag guest parking and multiple remarks reference 'guest stalls' or 'additional guest parking'. Mentions are present but not as ubiquitous as assigned parking, giving medium confidence.
No analysis available
Evidence that some units have tandem parking: 6 of 20 MLS listings flag TANDEM and several public remarks explicitly state 'tandem' parking or 'driveway stall tandem to the garage', indicating tandem stalls exist for at least some units.
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist, parking waiting list, and join-waitlist language and found nothing. The remarks consistently reference assigned or designated parking instead, so there is no evidence of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
The remarks repeatedly describe secured entry using key-fob access, including phrases like "secured lobby with key-fob entry" and "secured key fob access." This is strong direct evidence that the building has card/fob access security.
No analysis available
I searched for public remarks mentioning security patrol or similar services such as roving security or a patrolled building. The listings only mention secured entry, lobby access, and on-site management, not patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence across many listings confirms split AC systems throughout the building. Multiple remarks explicitly mention 'split A/C in every room,' 'three split A/C systems,' and 'high efficiency split A/C,' indicating this is not a copy-paste anomaly but a recurring building feature. This aligns with the historical MLS inclusion data (20/20 listings with ACSPL).
No analysis available
Strong evidence across listings for concrete construction elements: multiple public remarks (dozens of listings) mention 'concrete masonry block wall' or 'concrete masonry accent wall' (e.g., 'concrete masonry block wall at the entry', 'concrete masonry accent wall at the entry'). Historical MLS data also had 10/20 listings marked CONCRE, so the building-level concrete construction is well supported by both MLS data and repeated agent remarks.
Double-wall construction appears to be a common building feature for Nahele at Hoopili. The current MLS records show 17 of 20 listings with DOUWAL checked, and many remarks reference the building's "concrete masonry block wall" or similar masonry wall details, reinforcing the checkbox data. This looks like a broadly repeated building-level attribute rather than a one-off unit upgrade.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Minimal support for steel-frame construction: 3/20 MLS records include STEFRA, but public remarks contain no references to 'steel frame' or similar phrasing. Given the absence of any explicit mentions in agent remarks and the dominant references to concrete masonry, steel-frame construction is unlikely but not ruled out with high confidence.
There is no meaningful remark-based support for slab construction in the listings reviewed. With only 2 of 20 MLS records checked and no explicit references to a concrete slab foundation, this feature appears to be absent or at least not reliably reported for the building.
No analysis available
Mixed evidence: 4 of 20 current MLS entries include WOOFRA, but none of the public remarks explicitly say 'wood frame' — descriptions focus on 4-5 story elevator buildings with concrete masonry elements. Presence of WOOFRA boxes suggests some records identify wood framing, but the public remarks do not confirm it outright, so confidence is moderate (implied).
Strong, consistent evidence across listings: numerous remarks state the development is made up of 'four- and five-story condominiums' and repeatedly reference 'ground floor' or 'ground level' units. This confirms the buildings are above ground (no indication of subterranean residential levels).
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental allowed, STR permitted, vacation rental, TVU, and NUC language, but found no evidence. Based on the public remarks, there is no indication that short-term rentals are allowed in this building.
I looked for hotel pool references such as hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, and found none. Because there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this must also be false.
I searched for mandatory hotel pool or required rental-program language and found nothing. Since there is no evidence of STR allowance or a hotel pool, mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for ground lease, leasehold, lease expiry, lease ends, and renewal language, but found nothing. Since no specific expiration year is stated in the public remarks, this remains unknown.
The remarks repeatedly and explicitly confirm VA approval for the building. This is strong public evidence, including direct language that the community is on the VA approved list.
I looked for HOA insurance wording that would indicate the building is fully insured or that owners have walls-in coverage. The remarks do not mention insurance coverage at all, so there is no support for a true value. This remains false with low confidence due to absence of evidence.
13 of 20 current MLS listings include the FIRSPR amenity checkbox, but 0 public remarks mention 'fire sprinkler' or similar phrases. The evidence for sprinklers comes from agent-entered MLS amenities (possible copy/paste); no listing text confirms installation or recent change, so presence is implied rather than explicitly documented.
I searched the public remarks for explicit fire/life safety language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection. Nothing like that appears in the remarks, so there is no basis to mark this true. With no evidence, it remains false at low confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence for mountain views across many listings. Multiple remarks explicitly say "mountain and sunset views," "incredible mountain... views," and "views of the mountains and City of Kapolei," so this appears to be a consistent feature of some units. The repetition across many agent remarks supports it as a real building offering.
One listing explicitly mentions 'Diamond Head in the backdrop.' Because this is a single occurrence (possible agent-specific remark) the evidence is limited—buyers should know at least some units may have Diamond Head views, but confidence is moderate.
Several current listings explicitly mention city-oriented views, especially "Kapolei skyline views" and "views of the mountains and City of Kapolei." While the MLS checkbox appears limited, the remarks repeatedly confirm city views from multiple units, indicating this is a real feature available in the building.
No analysis available
Several listings (multiple agent remarks — at least 3–4 separate listings) reference courtyard/garden or landscaped views with phrases like 'ground floor courtyard unit', 'peaceful greenery views', and 'beautifully landscaped surroundings'. This recurring language across listings supports high confidence that the building offers garden/courtyard views for some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' remarks mention 'sunrise', 'morning sun', or eastern exposure (0 mentions). Several listings specifically reference 'sunset' views rather than sunrise, and historical/current MLS checkbox data do not show sunrise entries; therefore there is strong evidence the building does not offer sunrise views as a building-level feature.
Current MLS has 0/20 listings with SUNSET in view_descriptions and 7/20 explicitly list NONE; across extensive remarks, views mentioned are 'mountains and City of Kapolei' but never sunsets, suggesting sunset views are not a notable or marketable feature here.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit view language tied to fireworks, such as being able to see fireworks from the lanai or unit. The remarks only mention mountain, city, greenery, and sunset views, not fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
7 of 20 MLS listings include the RESMAN amenity and at least one public remark explicitly states 'on-site management' (quote: "on-site management, trash/recycling"). Historical confidence was High and current remarks continue to show explicit mentions, indicating strong evidence this building offers on-site/resident management.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.