Nahele at Hoopili
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Nahele at Hoopili
Building Overview
Nahele at Hoopili in Ewa — 2023 concrete construction with mountain views, pool, BBQ area, and resident manager.
About Nahele at Hoopili
Nahele at Hoopili is a condominium building located in the Ewa neighborhood. According to available records, the building was completed in 2023 and is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count are not provided in the MLS data available for this summary.
Based on MLS data, building amenities include a pool, a BBQ area, and a resident manager. Units offer split-system air conditioning and the building has one elevator. Mountain views are noted in the listing information.
Parking is available, covered, and assigned, with guest parking also indicated. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS information provided. Management company details and any association fees were not specified in the available data. Buyers should verify all details with the listing agent or management, as this summary is based solely on MLS data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched all remarks for explicit percentages or phrases describing the owner-vs-renter mix and found none. Owner-occupancy is a numeric field and cannot be inferred from the remarks, so it remains unknown (null) with low confidence.
Multiple public remarks mention elevator access and that these are 4-5 story buildings with elevators, confirming presence of elevators but no explicit numeric count. Per rules we do not change numeric fields without an explicit number in remarks, so the current value of 1 is retained with low confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
13 of 20 current listings include OTCOEX in association_fee_includes (historically ~12/20), which typically denotes common-area operating costs including building/common electricity. No remarks explicitly say 'hot water included' or 'common electric' but the OTCOEX checkbox is consistently present across multiple agent listings, indicating the association fee likely covers common-area electricity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 20 listings list HOTWAT as part of association fees, and 16 of 20 listings reference WTRHTR (individual water heaters) in inclusions or unit features (e.g., boiler/WH mentions absent but many unit-level appliance notes). Multiple listings explicitly list in-unit appliances and WTRHTR presence, so evidence is strong across agents that hot water is not supplied/included by the HOA.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Four of 20 current listings have SEWER in the association_fee_includes field, and no remarks mention separate sewer billing or exclusions. The consistency of this checkbox across multiple agents, without any conflicting narrative comments, supports that sewer is included in the maintenance fees for the building.
Four of 20 current listings indicate WATER in the association_fee_includes field, and listing remarks never say that water is separately metered or excluded from HOA fees. This pattern across multiple listings suggests that water is part of the maintenance fee rather than an agent-specific error.
MLS checkbox shows BBQ in 9 of 20 recent listings, and historical data indicated high confidence. Public remarks include only sparse/indirect language about grilling (e.g., 'private yard ... convenient for ... those who like to grill outdoors') rather than clear building-level BBQ amenities, so evidence is moderate and may reflect checkbox usage or private-yard grilling rather than dedicated communal BBQ stations.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Agents consistently highlight access to the 'SoHo Community Center' or 'rec center' with 'a large pool, spacious lawn, party room, pickleball courts, multiple playgrounds and meeting space.' With CLUHOU in the MLS and repeated, detailed descriptions across different listings, the community clearly provides a shared clubhouse-style facility.
No analysis available
Well-supported across listings: MLS shows DGPRK in 11 of 20 listings and the public remarks repeatedly mention 'dog park'/'dog parks' and pet-friendly community features, providing strong evidence that dog park facilities are part of the community amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS data shows MEEROO for multiple units and at least one remark explicitly references a 'meeting room' at the SoHo Community Center used by residents.
Multiple listings across various floor plans repeatedly state residents can “step out to the covered lanai,” with additional mentions of “covered & tiled patio balcony,” “open lanai,” “private lanai,” and “spacious covered lanai,” showing that patio/lanai spaces are a built-in part of these homes. This language appears in dozens of developer and resale remarks, not just a single copy-pasted listing, so buyers can expect patio/deck-style outdoor space in this building. The MLS checkbox under-represents the feature, but the consistent remarks provide strong evidence it exists building-wide.
Moderate evidence that jogging/walking paths or fitness paths exist: MLS shows WAJOPA in 11/20 listings and many remarks reference 'outdoor fitness parks', landscaped open spaces, and parks—suggesting walking/jogging routes are present in the master-planned community even if explicit 'jogging path' wording is limited.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is strong, multi-listing support for building/community recreation areas: MLS shows RECARE in 9/20 listings and numerous remarks cite 'rec center', 'recreation center', 'party room', 'spacious lawn' and similar amenity language across multiple agents, indicating a building/community recreation area is available.
Several listings note that residents can use the SoHo Community Center, which includes a 'party room' and 'meeting room' along with other amenities. Combined with RECROO checked in 4 of 20 MLS entries and prior high-confidence data, this supports that a shared recreation/party room is available to the building/community.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and 'bike and surfboard storage' and found only 'bike storage' references. There is no evidence of dedicated surfboard storage in the public remarks.
MLS has TENCOU on several entries and the remarks specifically mention 'pickleball/tennis court' and 'tennis facilities' as community amenities.
Strong, consistent evidence: trash chute is checked in 15 of 20 MLS listings and multiple public remarks explicitly list 'trash chute' or 'trash/recycling' as a building amenity, corroborating historical high-confidence data that the building includes a trash chute system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that the building/community offers a swimming pool: MLS amenities previously indicated 17/20 listings include pool and numerous current public remarks explicitly reference a community pool (quotes include “community complete with a pool” and “SoHo Community Center with its pool”). The language appears across multiple agents/listings (not a single outlier), indicating reliable, community-level pool access.
No analysis available
I searched for 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool' and found no matches. The remarks reference a pool generically, so there is no evidence it is a saltwater pool.
All recent listings (20/20 per MLS summary) and the current public remarks consistently advertise in‑unit laundry. Remarks contain repeated phrases such as "in‑unit washer and dryer", "full-size washer/dryer", and "Whirlpool washer & dryer", appearing across multiple agent listings and builder model descriptions—strong evidence the building offers units with in‑unit laundry (some language appears copied across listings, but the volume and consistency confirm the feature).
No analysis available
I searched for 'coin-op', 'quarters', 'paid laundry', 'card operated' and similar terms and found none in the remarks. The public remarks emphasize in-unit laundry rather than any paid community laundry.
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'floor-by-floor laundry' and found no references. Listings consistently advertise in-unit washers/dryers rather than shared floor-by-floor laundry.
Strong evidence across listings that the building provides parking: 20/20 MLS listings indicate parking features and remarks frequently mention 'garage', 'detached one-car garage', 'driveway 2nd stall', and 'street parking'. This is consistent across many agents and appears to be a stable building feature.
Multiple listings (14/20 in MLS checkboxes) and many remarks explicitly mention 'assigned' or 'designated' stalls (e.g., '2 designated pkg stalls', 'assigned parking stall is close to entrance', 'two assigned parking spaces'). Evidence is strong and consistent across different listings/agents.
Several listings highlight garage parking, such as 'this unit comes with a 1-car detached garage and driveway 2nd stall' and an 'oversized corner-end garage.' With over half of MLS entries marking covered/garage parking, the building clearly offers covered parking options via garages.
Public remarks consistently state assigned/designated parking stalls and garages that are described as coming with the unit (e.g., detached garage + driveway stall, assigned/tandem assigned spaces). While the word 'deeded' is not used explicitly, repeated unit-level garage/assigned parking language strongly indicates parking is conveyed with the unit.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', '$', 'rent parking' and similar phrases; none were present. No parking fee information is available from the public remarks.
Guest parking is mentioned across multiple listings (9/20 MLS flags) with remarks like 'additional guest parking' and 'access to nearby guest stalls'. Evidence is moderate — present in a number of listings but not ubiquitous.
No analysis available
Tandem parking is described in a subset of listings (6/20 MLS flags) with remarks explicitly using 'tandem' and describing garage + driveway-stall arrangements. Evidence is moderate and consistent for some units, indicating tandem parking is offered in the building.
No analysis available
Remarks describe assigned and guest parking, garages, and tandem stalls but do not reference any waitlist system. Absence of any 'parking waitlist' language suggests no documented waitlist in the public remarks.
No analysis available
Listings explicitly state secured lobby/entry with key-fob/key access in several places, providing strong evidence of card/fob access security in the building.
No analysis available
I searched for 'security patrol', 'roving security', 'patrol service' and related phrases and found none. The remarks reference secured entry and on-site management but do not describe a patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
High-confidence evidence: MLS inclusions show ACSPL for all 20 listings and numerous agent remarks explicitly state split or split A/C units (examples: 'split A/C in every room', '3-split ACs', 'Every room is equipped with a split AC unit'). The references are consistent across multiple agents/listings and match the MLS checkbox, so the building offers split (ductless mini-split) AC in units.
No analysis available
Strong multi-listing evidence: numerous public remarks (dozens across the dataset) explicitly reference concrete masonry elements—phrases include 'concrete masonry block wall', 'concrete masonry accent wall', and 'cosmopolitan concrete masonry block wall'. Historical data also showed high confidence and several MLS listings checked concrete, so concrete construction is well-supported across multiple agents and unit listings.
MLS checkbox evidence is strong: 18 of 20 current listings mark double-wall construction. Although public remarks do not explicitly state 'double wall' terminology, the widespread and consistent MLS coding (and prior high confidence) indicates the building offers double-wall construction—likely a project-level specification repeated across listings rather than repeated in marketing text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Little to no supporting evidence: only 2 of 20 current MLS listings include steel-frame in construction_materials and none of the public remarks mention 'steel frame' or similar. Given prior high confidence that the project emphasizes concrete masonry rather than steel framing and the absence of corroborating remarks, steel-frame construction is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: Only 3/20 MLS entries list WOOFRA despite consistent descriptions of 4–5 story elevator buildings with concrete masonry block walls; mid-rise elevator condos in this market are rarely primary wood frame, so the small number of wood-frame flags likely reflect miscoding.
Confidence 90%: All descriptions portray Nahele as "four- and five-story" elevator condominium buildings with no indication of subterranean residential levels, and MLS data includes ABOGRO for some units, consistent with standard above-ground mid-rise construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR language (short-term rental allowed, vacation rental, TVU, 30-day minimum, NUC, etc.) and found none. Because remarks are silent on STR permission and emphasize residential use, STR allowance cannot be confirmed and is marked as not allowed per remarks.
I searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel program', 'managed by hotel', and brand-pool references and found none. Since STR is not allowed per remarks, hotel-pool participation is not applicable.
I searched for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', and similar phrases and found none. With no STR or hotel pool mentioned, there is no evidence of any mandatory rental-pool requirement.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease', 'leasehold', 'lease expiry', and any four-digit expiry year; none were found. Because there's no lease information in the remarks, the lease expiry year is unknown.
Multiple listings include the explicit phrase 'ASSUMABLE VA LOAN', indicating VA approval/VA financing is available. Phrase is explicit in the remarks so confidence is high.
I scanned the remarks for explicit HOA/building insurance language (e.g., 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', 'comprehensive building insurance') and found no occurrences. Because there is no explicit statement that the building is fully insured by the HOA, the field is set false with medium confidence.
12 of 20 current MLS entries have the FIRSPR amenity checked, but 0 listings' public remarks explicitly mention 'fire sprinkler', 'sprinkler system', or 'fire suppression'. The presence appears to come from MLS checkbox data (possible copy/paste) rather than explicit agent remarks, so inclusion is cautious (moderate confidence).
I searched all public remarks for explicit language indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation (e.g., 'FLSE passed', 'passed fire inspection', 'life safety compliant') and found none. With no explicit mentions and no current true value, the field is set false with medium confidence (absence = likely not stated).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings' remarks (at least 6–8 separate listings) explicitly advertise mountain views with phrases like 'mountain & sunset views' and 'mountain and Kapolei city views'. Evidence is consistent across different agents' remarks and aligns with prior high-confidence historical data, indicating the building offers mountain views for some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' remarks mention 'sunrise', 'morning sun', or eastern exposure (0 mentions). Several listings specifically reference 'sunset' views rather than sunrise, and historical/current MLS checkbox data do not show sunrise entries; therefore there is strong evidence the building does not offer sunrise views as a building-level feature.
Current MLS has 0/20 listings with SUNSET in view_descriptions and 7/20 explicitly list NONE; across extensive remarks, views mentioned are 'mountains and City of Kapolei' but never sunsets, suggesting sunset views are not a notable or marketable feature here.
No analysis available
Searched for 'fireworks', 'watch fireworks from', and similar phrases; none were found. Views described are mountain, sunset, greenery, and city—not fireworks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (at least 3 distinct public remarks) explicitly state 'on-site management' or 'on-site management, trash/recycling' and current MLS amenities also list RESMAN on multiple units. Remarks come from different listings/agents and confirm the building has on-site/resident management (high confidence).
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.