Na Pali Gardens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Na Pali Gardens
Building Overview
Na Pali Gardens in Kaneohe (built 1967) — concrete construction with 2 elevators; pets and short-term rentals not allowed (per MLS).
About Na Pali Gardens
According to available records, Na Pali Gardens is a condominium building located in the Kaneohe neighborhood, originally built in 1967. The building is constructed of concrete and, per MLS data, is served by two elevators. Size details such as number of units or floors are not specified in the provided MLS information.
Key features noted in the MLS data include the building's concrete construction and two elevators. Pet ownership and short-term rentals are not allowed, as stated in the available records. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data.
Additional details commonly sought by buyers — such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, insurance, amenities beyond elevators, and specific unit-level information — are not provided in the MLS data supplied. This summary is based on MLS-derived information; prospective buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with official documents or the managing entity before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for numeric owner-occupancy percentages and qualitative clues about owner-heavy occupancy, but the remarks do not mention them. Because owner occupancy is only supported by explicit remark evidence here, the percentage remains unknown.
The remarks repeatedly confirm that the building has two elevators. This is direct, explicit evidence from multiple listings, so the current value is well supported.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
13 of 20 current MLS listings check CABTV in association_fee_includes. Across the public remarks provided, there are no explicit statements like "cable included" or similar, so the evidence comes from MLS data rather than marketing text. Because agent copy-paste behavior is common, this is plausible but not strongly verified by remarks.
17 of 20 current listings check OTCOEX, while the public remarks across the sample do not explicitly say 'common area electricity' or 'building power included.' This looks like a consistent MLS building-level inclusion rather than agent-generated remark text, though the absence of mention in remarks keeps confidence a bit below the sewer/water features.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water inclusion is not supported here: just 1 of 20 MLS entries check HOTWAT, while 15 of 20 list WTRHTR, which is a strong indicator the building does not supply hot water as a fee-included utility. None of the public remarks explicitly mention hot water being included in maintenance fees. This is consistent across multiple listings and fits the pattern of MLS checkbox noise rather than a shared amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
19 of 20 current MLS listings check SEWER, which is very strong evidence that sewer is included in the maintenance fee. The public remarks do not explicitly repeat it, suggesting this is coming from MLS checkbox data rather than copied marketing text.
19 of 20 current MLS listings check WATER, making this a highly reliable building-level fee inclusion. The remarks themselves do not mention water inclusion, so the evidence comes primarily from consistent MLS association fee data rather than listing copy.
BBQ is supported by the public remarks in several listings, including explicit phrases like "BBQ area" and "barbecue area." This is consistent across multiple agents/listings and is strong evidence that the building offers shared grilling facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence supports a shared meeting/community room at Na Pali Gardens. 6 of 20 current MLS listings check MEEROO, and at least one public remark explicitly says 'meeting rooms,' with another noting a 'recreation room,' suggesting the amenity is real and may be inconsistently copied into MLS data. The pattern looks more like a genuine building feature than a one-off agent error, but it is not mentioned in every listing.
Multiple listing remarks (approximately 10–12 entries) explicitly describe outdoor living areas such as '105 sq ft lanai', 'private fenced-in grassy area', 'private gated entryway/balcony', 'covered lanai', and 'private lanai'. The MLS amenity checkbox also indicates PATDEC/COVPAT on 7 of 20 listings; evidence is consistent across different agent remarks rather than a single copy/paste, so there is strong support that the building offers patios/decks/lanai spaces.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The MLS amenity checkbox RECROO is present in 7 of 20 current listings, and multiple remarks reference communal recreation/meeting areas (e.g., one remark explicitly states 'a recreation room' and others mention 'recreation areas' or 'meeting rooms'). Evidence is consistent across several listings and supported by the MLS checkbox entries, but references are not universal and may reflect some agent copy/paste, so the building is marked as having a recreation room with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for surfboard storage facilities or any mention of board storage. The remarks do not reference surfboard storage, bike-and-surfboard storage, or similar amenities.
There are no public-remark mentions of a tennis court, tennis facilities, or private tennis court anywhere in the supplied listings. With only 1/20 MLS listings showing the tennis code and no supporting remarks, the evidence points to a likely erroneous or copy-pasted MLS checkbox rather than a confirmed amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building clearly has a shared pool. Across the provided remarks, the pool is mentioned in many listings by multiple agents, often alongside other common amenities, which makes this strong and consistent evidence rather than a one-off copy-paste error. Current remarks repeatedly reference "swimming pool" or "pool" as part of the community amenities.
No analysis available
I looked for salt-water pool wording such as 'saltwater pool,' 'salt pool,' or 'saline pool.' The listings only say there is a pool, so there is no evidence that it is salt water.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported by the remarks: well over a dozen listings mention it directly, including phrases like 'in-unit laundry,' 'washer/dryer in unit,' 'stackable washer/dryer,' and 'washer/dryer is installed in the unit.' The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listings, so this appears to be a real building feature available in some units.
Community laundry appears to be a real building amenity, not just an MLS copy/paste artifact. It is explicitly mentioned in several remarks across different listings, including descriptions like 'community laundry room with commercial size washers and dryers' and 'community laundry in complex, as well!' The MLS checkbox support is strong at 14/20 listings, reinforcing that shared laundry is available in the building.
I searched for language indicating paid laundry, including coin laundry, coin-op, quarters, card access, or a laundry fee. The remarks mention community laundry and even commercial-size washers/dryers, but they do not say the laundry requires payment.
I looked for explicit references to laundry facilities being available on every floor, such as 'laundry on each floor' or 'floor-by-floor laundry.' The remarks only mention a community laundry room in the complex, which does not establish that every floor has laundry.
Parking is strongly confirmed for Na Pali Gardens. All 20 current MLS listings include parking features, and the remarks across many listings explicitly mention assigned, open, reserved, or guest parking. This appears consistent across multiple agents and is not just copy-paste checkbox data.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention '1 assigned parking stall,' 'one assigned parking stall,' 'reserved parking,' and a stall near the entrance, which is consistent with the high-confidence MLS assignment data. The evidence appears to come from multiple agents and is not just copy-paste, so this feature should be included.
No analysis available
I looked for terms like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The remarks only describe parking as assigned, open, reserved, or included, so there is no evidence that parking is deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for monthly parking charges, rental fees, or extra parking costs and found none. The listings describe parking as included or assigned, but do not mention any separate parking fee.
14 of 20 MLS records include guest parking and numerous public remarks confirm guest parking availability (e.g., 'ample guest parking', 'guest parking near the basketball court', '7 guest stalls for your visitors'). The consistency across listings shows guest parking is provided.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist language such as parking waiting list or join the waitlist for parking and found nothing. There is no indication that the building uses a parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for key card, fob, card reader, and electronic access terms. The remarks directly state the building has fob access and a fobbed elevator, which is strong evidence of a card/fob security system.
Evidence is strong that Na Pali Gardens has building security service. Multiple current remarks mention "security patrols," "secure building," and "security" in connection with the building, reinforcing the prior high-confidence MLS data (16/20 listings marked SECGUA). This appears to be consistent across several agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
I looked for references to security patrol, roving security, or patrolled building service. The remarks clearly state that the property has security patrols, so this feature is confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears to be the dominant pattern for Na Pali Gardens, with 16 of 20 current listings marked CONCRE. While the public remarks rarely state it explicitly, nothing in the listings suggests a different construction type, and the MLS pattern is strong enough to treat this as a confirmed building feature.
Double wall construction is suggested by 7 of 20 current MLS listings, but the public remarks do not explicitly describe the building as double-wall or two-wall construction. This looks like a weaker MLS-driven signal rather than a heavily corroborated feature, so confidence is moderate.
Hollow tile is not supported by the public remarks for Na Pali Gardens, and only 3 of 20 current listings carry the HOLTIL code. Because the feature is sparsely checked and there are no remarks describing hollow tile construction, it appears more likely to be an inconsistent MLS entry than a confirmed building characteristic.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 3 of 20 MLS listings include ABOGRO, and no listing remarks explicitly describe 'above ground' construction or materials. Given the lack of corroborating language in seller/agent remarks and the low prevalence in MLS checkboxes, there is weak evidence for this feature.
MLS construction_materials lists BRICK on 4 of 20 listings and at least 2 separate listing remarks explicitly reference exposed brick features such as “exposed brick accent” and “Real exposed brick wall.” The mentions appear in multiple agents' remarks and indicate brick is present in the building fabric (noted mainly as interior/exposed brick), so evidence is moderately strong but not definitive that the entire building is brick-constructed.
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR allowed, TVU, NUC, legal vacation rental, or 30-day minimum rules and found no evidence. With no supporting remarks, there is no basis to say short-term rentals are allowed.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as managed by hotel, Hilton pool, or similar program language and found none. Since there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this must remain false.
I searched for wording like mandatory hotel pool, required participation, or cannot opt out and found nothing. There is also no indication of an STR/hotel program in the public remarks, so this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as ground lease, lease expiry, lease ends, or renewal dates and found nothing. There is no public-remarks evidence indicating a leasehold expiration year.
Public remarks repeatedly confirm VA financing is available for this building. The listings include explicit VA-approved language and multiple VA assumable loan mentions, which is strong evidence.
I looked through the remarks for HOA insurance references such as fully insured or walls-in coverage, but nothing was stated. Since this is only determined from public remarks and none were found, there is no evidence to confirm full insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for explicit fire/life safety language, including FLSE, fire inspection pass language, and safety certification wording, but found none. With no direct evidence in the remarks, the feature remains unsupported and is treated as not indicated.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are very strongly supported. Roughly 16/20 listings show mountain-oriented view descriptions, and multiple remarks explicitly say “Koolau mountains,” “Ko'olau views,” “breathtaking Ko‘olau views,” and “stunning Ko‘olau Mountain views.” The consistency across many listings suggests this is a real building-level feature, not a copy/paste anomaly.
No analysis available
City views are weakly to moderately supported. Only 1/20 current MLS view descriptions mention CITY, but one listing explicitly states “stunning ocean, city, and Ko‘olau views,” which is enough to confirm the feature exists for at least some units. The evidence is limited compared with mountain views, so confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
Garden views appear to exist in at least some units, though the wording is less direct than for mountain views. About 4/20 current MLS records show GARDEN in the view descriptions, and remarks mention “views of greenery,” “lush landscaped grounds,” a “private, fenced-in grassy area,” and a balcony large enough for “a relaxing garden.” This supports a real but more modestly documented building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for direct statements about seeing Friday night fireworks from a lanai, unit, or building viewpoint. The remarks discuss mountain, ocean, and bay views, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports a resident manager at Na Pali Gardens. At least 3 current listings explicitly mention an on-site manager or resident manager, including phrases like "on-site manager," "on-site resident manager’s office," and "site manager," which aligns with the historically high-confidence MLS amenity data. This appears to be consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.