Mountain View Terrace
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Mountain View Terrace
Building Overview
Mountain View Terrace in Kaneohe — concrete building (1974) with mountain views and an on-site pool.
About Mountain View Terrace
Mountain View Terrace is located in Kaneohe and was built in 1974. According to available records the building is of concrete construction and offers mountain views. Unit size and number of units are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Based on MLS data, the building has two elevators and on-site amenities that include a pool, BBQ area, and a resident manager. The property is described as offering mountain views and concrete construction.
Parking is available with assigned stalls. Pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted according to the MLS information. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. Buyers should verify all details, fees, rules, and current management information with the listing agent or property management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy figures like '80% owner occupied' or descriptive phrases such as 'majority owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied.' No such information appeared in the public remarks, so the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown from this source.
Multiple listings directly confirm there are 2 elevators in the building. This matches the current value, so it can be kept with very high confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the current listings, 14 of 20 have OTCOEX checked in association_fee_includes. None of the public remarks explicitly say “common area electricity” or similar, so this appears to be an MLS pattern rather than agent-described detail, but the volume of checked listings is still a meaningful signal.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is little support for hot-water-included at the building level: only 4 of 20 current listings check HOTWAT, and 4 also show WTRHTR, which usually points to unit water heaters rather than a shared hot-water system. No public remarks explicitly describe hot water as included, so the evidence leans against this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly supported: 19 of 20 current listings have SEWER checked in association_fee_includes. Several remarks reinforce this with phrases like “the building's plumbing system has also been recently upgraded” and “all new pipes throughout building and unit completed,” indicating a shared building utility rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Water inclusion is very strongly supported by the MLS pattern, with 19 of 20 current listings checking WATER. Multiple remarks about comprehensive plumbing upgrades across the building make this look like a genuine association-covered utility rather than inconsistent agent input.
Strong building-level evidence confirms BBQ/grilling facilities are available. Across many listings, agents repeatedly reference 'BBQ areas' or 'BBQ facilities,' which is consistent and appears to be copied across multiple remarks rather than a one-off mention.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash facilities are explicitly named in multiple listings, including phrases like 'car wash bay,' 'car wash station,' and 'car wash area.' The repeated mentions across different remarks align with the MLS history and support this as a shared building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building offers patio/deck-type outdoor spaces. About 10+ listings mention lanai/balcony/deck language, including phrases like "private lanai," "covered lanai," "small private balcony," and "the outdoor deck has views," which is consistent across multiple agents. The MLS amenity data also shows PATDEC/COVPAT in many current listings, so this appears to be a legitimate shared feature for at least some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current remarks explicitly describe a recreation area, despite the MLS showing mixed RECARE activity (8/20). The amenities consistently described are pool, courts, BBQ, and car wash, so there is not enough public-remarks evidence to support a building-level recreation area feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across these remarks, 3 listings reference some form of storage, but it is described as in-unit or under-stair storage rather than building storage lockers/units. There are no explicit mentions of common storage rooms, lockers, or assigned storage units in the building, so the evidence does not support a building-level storage_unit feature.
I looked for surfboard storage references such as "surfboard storage," "board storage," or combined bike-and-surf storage amenities. The public remarks do not mention any surfboard storage facility.
High-confidence evidence: 16 of 19 current MLS listings include TENCOU and numerous public remarks explicitly state 'tennis court', 'pickleball court', or 'tennis / pickleball court' (e.g., 'pool, basketball and tennis courts', 'recent resurface of the pickleball court and basketball court'). Mentions appear across multiple agents/listings and align with historical high confidence that the building offers tennis facilities.
Moderately high evidence: 7 of 19 listings currently list TRACHU and several unit remarks explicitly mention 'trash chute on every floor' or similar phrases (also a listing noting 'trash chute on 3rd level'). Multiple independent remarks across listings indicate the building has a trash chute system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that the building has a pool. Numerous current listings mention it directly, including phrases like 'swimming pool,' 'community pool,' and 'pool, tennis and basketball court in complex,' which appears across many different remarks rather than a single copied description. This aligns with the current MLS amenities data showing pool on all listings.
No analysis available
I checked for explicit saltwater-pool language like "salt water pool," "saltwater pool," or "saline pool." The listings mention a pool, but nothing indicates it is salt water.
Strong, consistent evidence across many listings confirms in-unit laundry. Multiple remarks from different listings explicitly mention "in-unit Washer & Dryer," "washer & dryer in unit," "stack washer/dryer," and "full size stack washer and dryer," matching the already strong MLS inclusion history. This appears to be consistent building/unit-level feature information rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for coin-op, card-operated, quarters, laundry fee, or other paid community laundry wording. The public remarks do not mention any shared laundry system, so there is no evidence of paid community laundry.
I searched for phrases like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar floor-by-floor community laundry references. The remarks only mention in-unit washer/dryer or a laundry room inside the unit, not shared laundry facilities on every floor.
Parking is strongly supported across the listings: 20/20 current MLS records include a parking-related feature, and remarks repeatedly mention "one dedicated parking stall," "assigned parking stall," and "two assigned parking stalls." The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and does not appear to be a copy-paste error.
Assigned parking appears to be a real building feature, not just MLS noise: 16/20 current listings mark ASSIGN, and many remarks explicitly say "assigned parking stall(s)." The consistency across multiple listings supports high confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit deeded-parking language such as 'deeded parking,' 'owned stall,' or 'parking included in deed' and found none. The remarks repeatedly indicate assigned/dedicated stalls, which suggests parking is not confirmed as deeded from public remarks.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for parking fee language, including monthly parking charges and parking rental references, but found nothing. There is no public-remarks evidence to confirm a parking fee.
Guest parking is only weakly supported: 1/20 current MLS records show GUEST, and one listing mentions "ample street parking for guests." Because this could refer to street parking rather than a dedicated guest-parking area, confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for 'parking waitlist,' 'waiting list,' or similar language and found none. The listings describe individual parking stalls rather than a waitlist system, so there is no evidence of parking waitlist management in the remarks.
No analysis available
The remarks repeatedly describe secured access, including a secured lobby, key secured entry, and a secured front entrance. While they do not explicitly say "key card" or "fob," the repeated secure-entry references strongly suggest a card/fob-style access system.
0 of 18 public-remark sections explicitly mention a security guard or 24/7 security. Listings repeatedly state 'secured lobby', 'secure entry', 'key secured entry', and 'on-site/resident manager' (e.g., 'key secured entry with a Property Manager Office & Mailbox Area in the Secured Lobby'), but do not use phrases like 'security guard' or 'security personnel'. MLS checkbox SECGUA appears in only 1/18 listings, suggesting a likely checkbox error or isolated listing entry rather than a building-wide staffed security service.
I searched for explicit security patrol wording such as "security patrol," "roving security," or "patrolled building." The remarks mention a resident manager and secured entry, but no patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
10 of 18 current MLS listings include the ACWIUN inclusion and multiple public remarks explicitly state the unit has AC (e.g., 'AC & downstairs assigned parking stall', 'Fully equipped ... and AC'). Evidence comes from several different agent remarks plus the repeated MLS ACWIUN checkbox across listings, indicating some units in the building have window/room air-conditioning units.
All 20 current listings list CONCRE in construction materials, which is strong building-level evidence of concrete construction. The public remarks do not mention construction type, but there is no contrary evidence, and the MLS checkbox data is completely consistent across agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks repeatedly restrict ownership/use to owner-occupants and principal residences. That is strong evidence that short-term rentals are not allowed in this building.
I searched for hotel pool, hotel-managed rental program, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool language, and found none. Since short-term rentals are not allowed, a hotel rental pool cannot be supported here.
I looked for mandatory participation language such as required rental program, cannot opt out, or must be in a pool, and found none. With STRs disallowed, mandatory pool participation is also not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'lease expires,' 'ground lease,' 'leasehold,' and any 4-digit expiration year, but found nothing. Based on the listings provided, there is no evidence to identify a lease expiry date.
The listings directly support VA loan eligibility/usage. One remark says "VA assumable loan opportunity," and another says "VA Financing eligible!" This is strong public-remarks evidence that VA financing is approved.
I reviewed the remarks for any indication that the HOA/building provides full walls-in or comprehensive insurance coverage. The listings do not mention insurance status, so there is no evidence in the remarks to confirm that the building is fully insured.
No analysis available
I searched all public remarks for explicit fire/life safety language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, and fire inspection references. None were found, so there is no public-remarks evidence that the building has passed this evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that this building offers mountain views. In the current remarks, well over 10 listings explicitly mention Koolau or mountain views, and the language is repeated across multiple agents rather than appearing as a one-off. This aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS data showing mountain views in 20/20 listings.
No analysis available
Two of 18 current MLS view_descriptions list CITY, suggesting some units may have city/downtown views; however, none of the public remarks reference city or downtown views and the mentions are limited to a small number of listings, so the evidence is moderate and could be due to individual unit orientations or agent checkbox entries.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit views of Friday night fireworks from units or lanais. The remarks discuss mountain views, breezes, and sunsets, but do not mention fireworks views from the building.
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports a resident manager on-site. Multiple public remarks explicitly say "with an onsite resident manager" and "Property Manager Office" in the secured lobby, while the MLS history already showed RESMAN in 17/20 listings. This appears consistent across several listings rather than a one-off agent copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.