Moanalua Village
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Moanalua Village
Building Overview
Moanalua Village in Moanalua (built 1992) offers a pool and fitness center; assigned parking available. Pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Moanalua Village
Based on MLS data, Moanalua Village is a residential building located in the Moanalua neighborhood. The property was built in 1992. Size and construction type are not specified in the available MLS information.
According to available records, building amenities include a pool and a fitness center. The listing notes that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are prohibited.
Parking is available and assigned. The management company is not identified in the MLS data. This summary is based on MLS information; buyers should verify all details, including fees, exact unit sizes, building materials, and management arrangements, with the seller or their agent.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Agents focus on views, amenities, renovations, and proximity to bases and hospitals, but do not discuss how many units are owner-occupied versus rented. Without any quantitative or qualitative owner-occupancy statements, the owner_occupancy percentage is unknown.
The remarks describe multi-level townhomes accessed via garages and internal stairs, but never reference any elevators or lift access. Because elevator count is rarely listed in MLS data and no explicit evidence appears here, the number of elevators remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No public remarks mention cable TV being covered by HOA fees and only 4 of 19 current MLS records check CABTV, suggesting agents may be inconsistently marking this. Evidence is weak and likely due to copy/paste; therefore cable-included is omitted for the building (low confidence).
Common-area electricity is supported by the current MLS data in 13 of 20 listings (OTCOEX). The public remarks repeatedly describe shared amenities like the pool, clubhouse, fitness center, BBQ area, and recreation room, which fits a building-level maintenance structure, though the remarks do not explicitly name common electric.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not supported by the current evidence. Only 1 of 20 MLS records checks HOTWAT, while 14 of 20 list WTRHTR in unit inclusions, which is a strong indicator that hot water is not a building-paid maintenance item. None of the public remarks mention hot water being included, so this is best treated as false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is confirmed by the MLS data across all 20 listings. There are no public-remark contradictions, and the consistency across records suggests this is a stable building-level fee component rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Water inclusion is confirmed by the MLS data in all 20 listings. The evidence is uniform across records and there are no remarks suggesting otherwise, so this appears to be a dependable building-level feature.
BBQ facilities appear to be a shared building amenity. Multiple listings mention "BBQ area," "barbecue area," or "BBQ," and the current MLS data is consistently high (16/20), suggesting this is not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The clubhouse amenity is well supported at Moanalua Village. Several listings explicitly say "clubhouse" or reference the community center/recreation center, aligning with the high historical amenity rate (14/20).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports an exercise room/fitness facility at Moanalua Village. Across the remarks, roughly 8+ listings mention phrases like "fitness center," "fitness room," "exercise room," or "gym," and this is consistent with the high historical MLS rate (16/20).
No analysis available
Evidence for a meeting room is weaker than for the other amenities, but there are multiple references to a "recreation center," "rec area," and one "recreation room." That makes it plausible the building has a shared community/meeting space, even though the current MLS data only shows 3/20.
Building-level outdoor spaces are repeatedly mentioned in the listing remarks: at least 12 of 19 active public remarks reference a lanai/covered lanai (quotes include 'private lanai', 'covered lanai', and '2 lanais'). MLS checkbox is also set for 6/19 units; combined checkbox and consistent, multi-agent remarks provide strong evidence that the building offers patios/decks/lanais as amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderately strong evidence: around 9–11 listings explicitly mention a 'recreation area', 'rec area', or 'recreation center' (phrases include 'rec area' and 'recreation center'). The mentions are consistent across several listings though less ubiquitous than fitness/BBQ, so confidence is solid but slightly lower.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sauna is not supported by the remarks for this building. With only 1/20 MLS listings showing the amenity and no descriptive references in the public remarks, there is not enough evidence to treat it as an actual shared building feature.
No analysis available
I looked for surfboard storage facilities and related terms like board storage or surf storage. The remarks mention general storage in garages, units, and lanais, but nothing that indicates dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported by the current remarks across the building: roughly 18+ listings explicitly mention a pool, often alongside related amenities like jacuzzi, clubhouse, BBQ area, and fitness center. The language is consistent across multiple agents and appears to be standard amenity copy, but it still clearly confirms that the building offers a shared pool.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like salt water pool, saltwater pool, salt pool, or saline pool. The remarks consistently mention a pool, jacuzzi, spa, or whirlpool, but do not specify that the pool is saltwater.
In-unit laundry appears to be a building feature for this property type, with 18 of 20 recent MLS listings including washer/dryer in the inclusions. The public remarks reinforce this by describing 'the laundry on the ground floor' as part of the unit layout. Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like coin laundry, coin-op, quarters, card-operated machines, or laundry fees. The listings do not describe any shared paid laundry facility, so there is no evidence this building has paid community laundry.
I looked for language such as "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," or similar floor-by-floor laundry references. The remarks only mention laundry as being placed on the ground floor in one townhome layout, which does not support community laundry on every floor.
All 19 current MLS listings indicate some form of parking in parking_features and remarks repeatedly reference parking: 'one-car garage', 'attached one-car garage', 'tandem parking', 'assigned parking stall', and 'open parking'. Evidence is consistent across many agents/listings and aligns with prior high-confidence data, so the building clearly offers parking.
Assigned parking is clearly supported across many listings. At least several remarks explicitly say '1 assigned parking right across from the front door,' 'garage plus tandem parking,' or 'designated' unit-specific parking, and the MLS history shows 11/20 listings with ASSIGN. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Covered parking is supported by many remarks and the MLS history. Listings mention 'two-car garage,' 'attached one-car garage,' 'covered garage,' and 'covered parking space,' with only a few units phrased differently. The high frequency across the listings indicates this is a building-level feature, not an isolated unit amenity.
I looked for explicit wording like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in the deed. The listings describe garage, assigned, tandem, guest, and uncovered/open parking, but do not explicitly state that any stall is deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for parking cost language such as monthly parking fees, additional parking costs, or parking rental charges. The remarks discuss parking arrangements, but no parking fee is stated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like parking waitlist, waiting list for parking, or instructions to join a parking queue. Nothing in the remarks suggests a parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
I looked for card/fob access language such as keycard entry, fob access, or electronic access. The community is described as gated, private, and secure, but there is no public remark evidence of a card-based security system.
No analysis available
I searched for patrol-service language including security patrol, roving security, and patrolled building. The listings describe the community as gated and secure, but do not mention any patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is strongly supported across many listings for this building. Multiple remarks from different listings explicitly describe 'split AC,' 'split ACs in the living and main bedroom,' 'two Split AC systems,' and '3 split AC's,' indicating this is a real building/unit feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error. This aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS pattern, so the feature should remain included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Double-wall construction appears to be a stable building feature. It is supported by the current MLS data in 17 of 20 listings, and none of the remarks contradict it or suggest a switch to single-wall construction. The repeated listing pattern looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete slab foundation is not supported by the remarks provided. Only 3 of 20 current MLS listings check SLAB, and none of the public remarks explicitly mention a 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation.' Based on the available evidence, this appears to be an unreliable MLS checkbox rather than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
10 out of 19 recent MLS listings include WOOFRA (wood frame) in construction materials. None of the public remarks explicitly state 'wood frame' or 'wood frame construction', so the evidence relies on multiple agents checking the MLS box rather than explicit remarks. Given the majority of listings indicate wood-frame, it is likely the building is wood-frame, but confidence is moderate because descriptions do not explicitly confirm it and there is no owner/site verification.
There is moderate support for above-ground construction. While only 7 of 20 MLS listings currently check the box, several remarks say things like '2 stories above the lower-level garage,' 'three-level residence,' and floor plans with the garage on the first floor and living space above. That suggests the building is constructed above grade, but the evidence is not as strong as for double-wall construction.
No analysis available
Across 18 listings, none of the public remarks reference single-wall or old Hawaiian-style construction. Only 2/18 MLS entries checked single-wall versus 16/18 checking double-wall, strongly suggesting the single-wall entries are mistakes. Given the building’s modern, multi-level townhouse form, it is highly likely the project is not single-wall construction.
I searched for explicit STR indicators such as short-term rental allowed, vacation rental, NUC/TVU, or hotel-style rental wording. The remarks do not mention any STR permission, so there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed.
I checked for hotel pool references like hotel rental program, hotel-managed units, Hilton/Ritz/Trump pool participation, or similar language. None appears in the remarks, and there is no evidence of STR allowance to support this being true.
I searched for wording such as mandatory pool, required participation, cannot opt out, or must be in the rental program. The remarks contain no such language, so mandatory hotel-pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold language such as "lease expires," "ground lease," "land lease," and any four-digit lease end year. Nothing in the public remarks indicates that this is a leasehold property or gives a lease expiry date.
Public remarks directly confirm VA financing availability through a VA assumable loan. This is strong evidence that the building/unit can be marketed with VA financing, so the feature is true.
The text shows that the HOA carries some form of insurance (mentioned via a special assessment) but does not clarify the scope or whether it is walls-in/full coverage. Since no listing explicitly states that the building is fully insured, we treat full/walls-in coverage as not verified.
No analysis available
Listings highlight amenities (pool, clubhouse, fitness center) and location but never mention any fire/life safety evaluation or certification. In the absence of explicit statements, we cannot confirm a passed evaluation and default to not having verified FLSE status.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported across the building. Current MLS data shows ocean in 11/20 view descriptions, and the remarks repeatedly confirm it with phrases such as "sweeping ocean views," "partial Pacific Ocean views," and "ocean and golf course views." This appears consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
Mountain views are present in the building, though less frequently than ocean or golf course views. The current MLS data shows mountain in 9/20 listings, and the remarks include an explicit "serene mountain views" reference. This suggests some units have mountain-facing exposures while others do not.
No analysis available
City views are mentioned in multiple listings (CURRENT MLS: 7/19) with phrases such as "city lights" and "Downtown Honolulu" appearing in agent remarks. Evidence comes from several different listings, so the building does offer units with city views.
Coastline views appear to be a real offering in the building, though the remarks more often describe them as ocean views rather than using the exact word "coastline." Current MLS data shows coastline in 10/20 listings, and several remarks describe ocean-facing or partial Pacific Ocean vistas. Evidence is moderately strong and consistent across multiple listings.
No analysis available
Golf course views are one of the building's most consistently advertised features. The current MLS data shows golf course views in 14/20 listings, and numerous remarks explicitly say "overlooking Moanalua Golf Course" or mention "golf course views" from lanais, primary suites, and living areas. This is strong multi-listing evidence, not just checkbox noise.
No analysis available
Although 1/19 MLS view_descriptions list SUNRIS, the public remarks contain no references to "sunrise," "morning sun," or eastern exposure. Given the lack of corroborating remarks across multiple listings, there is insufficient evidence that the building widely offers sunrise views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit references to watching Friday night fireworks from the building or from a unit/lanai. The remarks mention ocean, golf course, harbor, city, mountain, and Diamond Head views, but nothing about fireworks views from the property.
No analysis available
No analysis available
10 of 20 current listings include RESMAN in the MLS amenities, which suggests the building likely has a resident manager on-site. However, none of the public remarks explicitly mention a resident manager, so the evidence appears to come from the checkbox data rather than repeated descriptive confirmation. This is moderate-confidence building-level evidence, not strong enough to treat as fully verified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.