Mililani Parkway
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Mililani Parkway
Building Overview
Mililani Parkway in Mililani-Waipio; concrete building (1990) with pool and resident manager.
About Mililani Parkway
Mililani Parkway is located in the Mililani-Waipio neighborhood and was built in 1990. According to available records the building is constructed of concrete. Unit counts and specific floorplan/size details are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, building amenities include a pool and a resident manager. Air conditioning is listed as window units. The listing specifies that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed.
Parking is available with assigned stalls and guest parking. The management company is listed as Unknown in the MLS records. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, fees, rules and availability directly with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for owner-occupancy indicators such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or other qualitative ownership mix statements, but none appeared. The only related phrase was "Original owner," which refers to a unit owner, not the building-wide occupancy rate.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as "elevator," "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," and any lift-access language, but found nothing. Based on the remarks alone, the elevator count cannot be determined.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
About half of the recent listings (11/20) include OTCOEX in association_fee_includes, suggesting the building likely includes some common-area electricity costs in maintenance. The public remarks are largely silent on this item, so the support comes mainly from MLS checkbox data rather than agent commentary.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No recent listing includes HOTWAT in association fees, and most listings instead show WTRHTR as a unit feature. Several public remarks mention unit-owned water heaters, including "new hot water heater" and "tankless water heater," which strongly supports that hot water is not provided by the HOA.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is listed as included in maintenance fees on every recent MLS listing reviewed (20/20). There are no public remarks suggesting otherwise, so this appears to be a stable building-wide feature.
Water is included in the association fees on all recent listings reviewed (20/20). The public remarks are consistent with the MLS data and do not suggest any deviation, making this a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The compiled public remarks emphasize parking, in-unit laundry, nearby parks, and Mililani Town Association recreation centers but do not reference any dedicated surfboard or board storage facilities. I specifically searched for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and 'bike and surfboard storage' and found no evidence. Based on this absence, it is moderately likely that the building does not offer dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool access is strongly supported across the listings. At least 6+ remarks explicitly mention Mililani’s recreation centers with pools, including phrases like "seven recreation centers with pools," "swimming pools," and "community pool." The evidence is consistent across multiple agents/listings and aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS amenity data.
No analysis available
Listing remarks reference access to multiple recreation centers and community swimming pools but never specify that any are salt water. Searched for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline', and 'salt pool' and found none, so there is no evidence the building or association offers a salt water pool.
Strong evidence confirms in-unit laundry for this building. At least 6 listings explicitly mention it with phrases like "indoor washer and dryer," "full size washer and dryer," "washer and dryer in the unit," and "washer and dryer hook-ups right in your unit." This aligns with the historical MLS pattern (18/20 listings including washer/dryer), suggesting the feature is common and not just an agent copy/paste error.
No analysis available
Remarks were reviewed for any indication that residents pay per use for community laundry, including terms like coin laundry, card-operated machines, or laundry fees, and none appeared. Because only in‑unit laundry is mentioned and no shared or paid laundry is referenced, paid community laundry is assumed not to be present.
Public remarks were searched for phrases indicating shared laundry on every floor, such as 'laundry on each floor', 'community laundry room on every floor', or similar, and none were found. Repeated references to in‑unit washer/dryer suggest that laundry is provided within units rather than via community facilities on each floor.
Parking is clearly available for this building. Across the remarks, many listings mention either "two parking stalls," "2 parking spaces," or simply "2 parking," and none contradict parking availability. This appears consistent across multiple agents and is not just copy-paste MLS checkbox data.
Assigned parking is strongly supported for this building. Multiple listings explicitly state "2 assigned parking stalls" or similar wording, and some add that the stalls are "right in front of the unit" or "right outside your doorstep." The evidence is consistent across several remarks and aligns with the MLS data.
No analysis available
The listings repeatedly say the unit has assigned parking stalls, which points away from deeded parking. I found no wording such as deeded, owned, or included in deed.
No analysis available
I looked for parking rental charges, monthly stall fees, or separate parking costs, but the remarks do not mention any. The listings describe parking as included with the unit, so there is no evidence of an additional parking fee.
Guest parking is supported by both the MLS data and the public remarks. One listing mentions "guest parking stalls" and another says there are "6 guest stalls nearby for visitors," showing this is a real building-level feature. The evidence is strong enough to include for buyers searching for guest parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for any mention of a parking waitlist, parking queue, or waitlist system and found nothing. The remarks instead emphasize assigned parking stalls and guest parking, which suggests parking is available without a referenced waitlist.
No analysis available
The public remarks focus on unit renovations, parking, nearby parks, and Mililani Town Association amenities, but do not reference any card or fob-based building access system. Terms like key card access, fob entry, card reader, or controlled electronic access were not found, so this feature is assumed not present based on available information.
No analysis available
Listings describe community conveniences and some in-unit security features (e.g., security laminates and alarm), but nothing about a building-wide or complex-wide security patrol service. Since there are no references to roving security or patrols, this feature is inferred to be absent from the current remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window A/C appears to be a consistent building feature: 18 of 20 current listings include ACWIUN in the MLS inclusions. Public remarks mostly do not explicitly mention window units, but one listing notes the unit is enjoyed in 'air conditioned comfort,' which is consistent with AC availability. The repeated MLS checkbox data across many listings suggests this is not a one-off agent entry.
No analysis available
Double wall construction is supported by 16 of 20 current MLS listings, a strong majority that indicates this is likely a standard building feature. The public remarks do not explicitly describe it, so this appears to be driven mainly by repeated MLS data rather than agent commentary.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete slab construction is not supported by the public remarks. Only 5 of 20 current listings show SLAB in MLS data, and there are no listing remarks describing a slab foundation or any foundation update, so the evidence is too weak to confirm.
No analysis available
Wood frame construction appears in 13 of 20 current MLS listings, suggesting it is present in the building, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention wood frame construction. The evidence looks more like MLS checkbox consistency than remark-based confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit short-term rental permission terms such as STR allowed, TVU, NUC, or vacation-rental language, but found none. There is also no mention of a 30-day minimum or owner-occupant-only rule, so the remarks do not provide evidence that STR is allowed.
I looked for hotel pool references such as hotel-managed, Hilton/Ritz pool, or similar rental-program language, and found none. Because the remarks do not support STR allowance, hotel-pool participation is also marked false.
I searched for mandatory participation language like required rental pool, cannot opt out, or must rent when not occupying the unit, and found nothing. There is no remark evidence suggesting a mandatory hotel pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for leasehold references such as lease expiry, ground lease end dates, renewals, or extension years, but found none. With no explicit leasehold information in the listings, the expiry year remains unknown.
A public remark directly confirms the building is VA approved, which supports VA loan eligibility. I looked for any contrary statements in the other remarks and found none.
I searched the remarks for HOA insurance clues like fully insured, walls-in coverage, or full building insurance, and found none. The listing text does not provide enough evidence to mark the building as fully insured.
No analysis available
I looked for fire/life-safety compliance language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection, but there were no references. Without any remark evidence, this feature is not confirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence for mountain views is limited: 1 of 20 listings has MOUNTA in the MLS view field, while 15 of 20 say NONE. The public remarks mostly focus on location and amenities and do not consistently describe mountain views, so this looks like a feature present in at most a small subset of units rather than a building-wide, strongly advertised attribute.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence from current MLS data (3/20 listings with GARDEN in view_descriptions) plus remarks like a unit that 'overlooks a small grass area' indicate that some Mililani Parkway units face landscaped or grassy areas. While many agents mark 'NONE' for view on their specific listings, buyers can still find units in this complex with garden/green space outlooks. The presence of multiple independent listings with garden views suggests this is not a one-off penthouse-type feature but an option within the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks describe views, location, parks, shopping, and amenities but do not mention any fireworks views from the units or building. Because this is a notable selling point that is not advertised at all, it's reasonably likely that fireworks views are not a feature here. In the absence of any mention, this feature is marked as not present.
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported by the current MLS data, with 18 of 20 listings checking RESMAN. The public remarks do not explicitly call out an on-site/live-in manager, but the consistent MLS amenity marking across many listings suggests the feature is present rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.