Mililani Garden Homes 1
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Mililani Garden Homes 1
Building Overview
Mililani Garden Homes 1 in Mililani-Waipio, built 1971; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Mililani Garden Homes 1
Mililani Garden Homes 1 is located in the Mililani-Waipio neighborhood and was built in 1971. According to available MLS records, specific unit sizes and construction details are not provided in the listing data.
Key policies indicated in the MLS include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as Unknown in the available records. No building amenities or community features are specified in the MLS data reviewed.
Additional information commonly sought by buyers—such as parking arrangements, HOA/maintenance fees, special assessments, and utility responsibilities—is not included in the provided MLS details. Based on MLS data, prospective buyers should verify all building, policy, and fee information with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for owner-occupancy percentages and phrases like "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied," but found no such language. Without an explicit percentage or ownership-mix statement, owner occupancy cannot be determined from these listings.
I searched the public remarks for references to elevators, lifts, and wording like "multiple elevators" or "four elevators," but found nothing. With no explicit elevator count in the remarks, the building's elevator presence remains unknown from this source.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
13 of 14 listings currently indicate common area electricity is included in the maintenance/association fee. The public remarks do not explicitly say "common area electricity," but they repeatedly reference low maintenance fees and the building/community amenities, which is consistent with a shared-building utility being covered. This appears to be a strong MLS-level pattern rather than a one-off agent typo.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/13) currently indicate 'hot water included' (HOTWAT) while 9/13 include 'WTRHTR' (water heater) in unit inclusions, implying unit-supplied hot water. Public remarks across the listings do not mention hot-water-included or building-supplied hot water, and evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than isolated copy/paste; therefore the building should be marked as not including hot water in the association fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple remarks explicitly describe outdoor amenity space, including “nice cool lanai,” “private lanai,” “fenced lanai,” and “covered patio” style language. The MLS currently has patio/deck checked in 8/14 listings, and the public remarks reinforce that this is a real feature available to buyers in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is mentioned very frequently across the listings, with phrases like “private yard,” “private fenced backyard,” “private back yard,” and “private enclosed backyard.” The MLS currently shows PRIYAR in 10/14 listings, and the consistency across multiple agents strongly confirms that units in this building offer private yard space.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks highlight features such as private fenced yards, proximity to parks and recreation centers, parking arrangements, and interior upgrades, but do not reference any surfboard or board storage facilities. I specifically searched for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and similar phrases. Given the complete absence of such mentions across multiple listings, it is likely that the building does not offer dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool access is strongly supported across the remarks, with many listings referencing Mililani recreation amenities such as "pools," "water slide," "slide pool," "10 ft deep lap pool," and "Heated Pools with Water Slides." The feature is mentioned in multiple separate descriptions, indicating consistent building/community amenity coverage rather than a one-off agent note. Historical MLS checkbox data also aligned with this, reinforcing high confidence.
No analysis available
All remarks referencing pools describe standard community, lap, or heated pools with slides and jets, but never indicate they are saltwater. Searched for 'salt water', 'saltwater', 'saline', and 'salt pool' across all remarks and found no matches, so the pool is assumed not to be saltwater based on available information.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched all remarks for indicators of paid shared laundry such as 'coin laundry,' 'coin-op,' 'card-operated,' 'laundry fee,' or 'community laundry' and found none. Listings emphasize in-unit washer/dryer and do not reference any shared laundry facilities. In the absence of any supporting evidence, this feature is marked false with medium confidence.
Searched remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor,' 'laundry room on every floor,' or 'community laundry' and did not find any references. Multiple listings describe in-unit laundry, which is more typical for these 2-story townhomes and makes floor-by-floor community laundry unlikely. Based on the absence of any mention, this feature is set to false with medium confidence.
Parking is clearly present across the listings, with all 14 current MLS records showing parking features and multiple public remarks describing stalls or spots. The language is consistent across listings and appears repeatedly from different agents, so this is very strong evidence of building-level parking.
Assigned parking is strongly supported by both the MLS checkbox data and the remarks. At least several listings explicitly say 'assigned stall' or 'assigned parking stalls,' and the pattern is repeated by multiple agents, not just a single copy-paste note.
Covered parking is well supported, though not as universally shown as general parking. Multiple listings explicitly mention a 'covered carport' or 'covered' stall, so buyers looking for covered parking would reasonably see this as a building feature.
The listings consistently indicate assigned parking included with the unit, but they never use deeded/owned parking language. Based on the public remarks, parking appears assigned rather than deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for any monthly parking charge, parking rental, or additional fee language, but none was mentioned. The remarks only say the unit has assigned parking stalls.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for waitlist language and found no references to a parking waiting list. The repeated mention of assigned parking suggests parking is provided directly rather than through a waitlist system.
No analysis available
Multiple listings describe interiors, yards, parking, and proximity to schools, parks, bases, golf course, and recreation centers but never reference any card or fob-based access system. Searched for terms like key card, keycard entry, fob access, and electronic access with no matches, so card access is likely not present.
No analysis available
Remarks focus on unit upgrades, fenced yards, nearby parks, schools, bases, shopping, dining, and Mililani recreation centers, with no indication of any dedicated security patrol service. Searched for security patrol, roving security, and similar terms across all provided remarks and found none, so a patrol service likely does not exist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, there are 0 explicit mentions of window AC or window units. One listing does mention "split AC units for your comfort," which supports air conditioning generally but not window air conditioning specifically, and the rest of the remarks are silent on AC type. This pattern suggests the current MLS inclusion is likely not a reliable indication of window AC in the building.
No analysis available
Double wall construction appears consistently in the MLS records for this building, with 11 of 14 current listings checked DOUWAL. The public remarks are silent on construction, so this is driven mainly by repeated MLS checkbox data and likely reflects common agent entry rather than remark confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction is not supported by the listing remarks and appears in only 2 of 14 current MLS entries. With no explicit mention across the remarks and no historical confidence supplied, this is too weak to treat as a building feature and is likely a copy/paste or checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR permitted, NUC, TVU, vacation rental language, and minimum-stay rules, but found none. The remarks only describe ordinary residential use and community amenities.
There is no evidence of any hotel rental pool program in the public remarks. Because the listings do not indicate STR availability, hotel-pool participation should be treated as false.
I searched for mandatory rental-pool wording such as required participation, cannot opt out, or must rent, and found nothing. With no STR or hotel-pool references, there is also no basis for a mandatory pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as lease expiry year, ground lease end, renewal dates, and lease extension terms, but found nothing. The remarks read like standard fee-simple townhome marketing and do not mention any leasehold tenure.
The public remarks repeatedly advertise VA financing/assumption options, which is direct evidence the building/unit is being marketed with VA loan eligibility. This is the strongest and clearest feature in the remarks.
One listing explicitly advertises "100% hurricane coverage!" which is strong evidence that the association provides full insurance coverage consistent with walls-in/full building insurance. This is the clearest available remark for this feature and overrides any prior uncertainty.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit fire/life safety language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection, and none appeared in the remarks. Since there is no current affirmative evidence from the listings, this is treated as not confirmed/likely false from the available remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings in the current MLS set mention sunset views, and 8 of 14 explicitly show NONE in the view description. Across all provided public remarks, there are no references to sunset, western exposure, or evening sun, suggesting the feature is not supported for this building.
No analysis available
Searched for terms like 'fireworks', 'watch fireworks from lanai', or 'see fireworks from unit' and found none. Given both the inland location and lack of any fireworks-view marketing, it is likely there is no notable fireworks view from this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.