Mawaena Kai 1 and 2 and 3
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Mawaena Kai 1 and 2 and 3
Building Overview
Mawaena Kai 1, 2 & 3 in Hawaii Kai (built 1988) with concrete/wood construction, mountain views, and assigned covered parking.
About Mawaena Kai 1 and 2 and 3
Mawaena Kai 1 and 2 and 3 is a residential condominium complex located in the Hawaii Kai neighborhood. According to available records, the buildings were built in 1988 and constructed with a mix of concrete and wood frame components. Based on MLS data, units in the complex offer mountain views.
Key features reported in MLS data include a pet-friendly policy and a prohibition on short-term rentals. These are stated conditions from the listing data; buyers should confirm current rules with the association or management.
Parking at the complex is listed as available, covered, and assigned, with guest parking also noted. The management company is shown as unknown in the MLS data. Buyers are advised to verify parking arrangements, pet rules, rental restrictions, association fees, and management details with official HOA documents and the listing broker prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for an owner-occupancy percentage and phrases such as “majority owner occupied” and “highly owner occupied.” No owner-occupancy information was found, so the percentage cannot be determined.
The remarks were searched for explicit elevator references such as “4 elevators,” “four elevators,” and “multiple elevators.” None were found, so the number of elevators cannot be determined from the available public remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
At least 2 public remarks explicitly mention "80+ TV channels," indicating cable TV is included in the building’s additional fees. Although the remarks appear to be copied between listings, the evidence aligns with 7/20 current MLS records marking CABTV and the prior high-confidence finding.
Common area electricity is supported mainly by MLS checkbox data rather than explicit marketing remarks. Fourteen of twenty current listings include OTCOEX, which is substantial, but the public remarks do not directly confirm the expense. This is likely a real building fee item, though the evidence is a bit more administrative than descriptive.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks mention included hot water, and current MLS data shows HOTWAT in 0/20 listings. The presence of WTRHTR in 14/20 listings is strong contrary evidence that hot water is individually supplied, so this feature should remain false.
At least 2 listings explicitly quote "Spectrum 1GB speed internet" as included in other fees. This is consistent with 6/20 current MLS entries marking INTSER and the prior high-confidence conclusion, though the remarks appear to reuse the same text.
No analysis available
Sewer charges are referenced in both remarks and MLS data. At least one listing explicitly mentions a separate sewer fee, and current MLS data shows SEWER in 4 of 20 entries, indicating this cost is part of the community's recurring fee structure. The evidence is moderate but consistent.
No supplied public remark explicitly discusses water fees, but 17/20 current MLS listings mark WATER as included. This broad, consistent MLS pattern and the prior high-confidence assessment strongly support that water is included in the association fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the reviewed remarks mention a car wash, auto wash, or vehicle wash area, despite 7 of 20 MLS entries carrying the CRWSH amenity flag. The public remarks repeatedly focus on marina access, boat docks, parking, and storage, which makes the car wash flag look unsupported and likely erroneous.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building offers patios/decks: over 15 of the current listing remarks explicitly mention outdoor spaces (phrases include "covered lanai", "private lanai", "3 private courtyards", and "enclosed back patio"). References to covered lanais, multiple lanais, yards, and decks appear across numerous agent listings and listings from different agents, indicating a genuine building feature rather than a single copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate-to-strong evidence that some units have private yard space: at least 4 separate remarks explicitly note 'exclusive direct lawn access ... deeded solely for the use of this first-floor residence,' 'private, completely fenced, uncovered lanai area,' and 'private entry courtyard' or 'private courtyard off the master suite.' These explicit descriptions across multiple listings indicate private yard/deeded private outdoor spaces exist for some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly confirmed across multiple listings and agents, with at least 10 of 20 listings marking it in unit features and 11 of 20 marking storage-related building amenities. Remarks repeatedly identify concrete storage spaces such as attic/carport storage, private storage rooms, walk-in storage, built-in storage, and ample storage, so this does not appear to be merely copied checkbox data.
The remarks contain direct evidence of surfboard storage space. This supports the feature with high confidence, although the exact storage location or whether it is a formal shared facility is not specified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for salt water pool, saltwater pool, salt pool, saline pool, and similar wording. No such feature appears in the remarks, and the building context indicates there is no pool.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the building: historical MLS data shows washer/dryer in inclusions for 19 of 20 listings, and at least four current remarks explicitly mention it. Key phrases include “Full size washer and dryer,” “dedicated laundry area,” “washer/dryer,” and “dedicated laundry room,” providing confirmation from multiple listings rather than relying only on copied checkbox data.
No analysis available
The remarks reference private laundry equipment and dedicated laundry areas rather than shared paid facilities. No public-remarks evidence indicates that community laundry requires payment.
The listings mention private or dedicated laundry areas, including a full-size washer and dryer, but do not describe community laundry facilities on every floor. No public-remarks evidence confirms this feature.
Parking is explicitly mentioned in at least 20 listings, with repeated references to assigned, deeded, or multiple stalls. Examples include "two parking stalls," "three parking spots," and "FOUR deeded parking stalls," indicating strong confirmation across multiple listings and agents.
Assigned/reserved parking is well supported by both MLS flags and remarks. The wording is consistent across multiple listings, including “assigned parking stalls,” “deeded parking,” and “designated parking,” indicating this is not just copy-paste checkbox noise.
Covered parking is explicitly mentioned in at least 10 listings, often with the exact mix of covered and open stalls. Key phrases include "one covered," "1-covered + 1-open," and "storage adjacent to covered parking," strongly confirming that the building offers covered parking.
Multiple public remarks explicitly describe parking stalls as deeded, establishing that deeded parking exists in the building. Other listings describe assigned stalls, but this does not negate the repeated deeded-parking references.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for parking fees, monthly parking charges, parking rental costs, and additional parking expenses. They mention assigned, deeded, and multiple parking stalls, as well as marina and sewer fees, but none of those are identified as parking fees.
Guest parking is directly mentioned in at least 2 listings, including "ample guest stalls throughout the property" and "Lot of guest parking." Although many remarks focus on unit-specific parking rather than guest facilities, the 14-of-20 MLS indication and explicit confirmations provide strong building-level evidence.
Secured-entry parking is implied by consistent remarks about the development being gated and secure, though explicit parking-secured-access wording is less common than the parking counts. The evidence appears across many listings and multiple agents, suggesting a genuine building-level secured parking/access environment rather than a single-agent copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings describe numerous assigned, deeded, and guest parking stalls, but do not mention limited parking availability or a waitlist system. Therefore, there is no public-remarks evidence that the building maintains a parking waitlist.
No analysis available
Multiple listings describe Mawaena Kai as gated, private, secure, or secured, but those descriptions do not establish a card- or fob-based access system. No specific public-remarks evidence confirms card access.
0 of 20 listings mention a security guard or related service in their remarks. Although 1 of 20 listings has SECGUA checked, the repeated descriptions are limited to phrases such as “gated community,” “secured gated community,” and “gated and secure community,” suggesting access control rather than confirmed on-site guard service.
The listings repeatedly describe gated or secure access and an onsite resident manager, but do not mention patrol personnel or a security patrol service. No public-remarks evidence confirms this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is overwhelming evidence that this building offers split AC in at least some units. Multiple independent listings mention it directly, and the remarks include specific installation/upgrade details, which strongly supports that this is a real building feature rather than copy-paste checkbox noise. This is consistent with the historical MLS signal and is confirmed by many distinct recent remarks.
No public remarks mention window or wall air-conditioning units despite 3 of 20 MLS inclusions listing ACWIUN; absence from all remarks suggests the few MLS checks may be agent checkbox variance or copy/paste. Given the lack of corroborating remarks, the building should not be promoted as having window AC as a building-level feature.
No analysis available
Double-wall construction appears to be a real building feature. The current MLS data shows 16 of 20 listings marked DOUWAL, which is a strong building-level signal and likely reflects repeated accurate entry rather than a one-off copy/paste error. Public remarks do not call it out, but the MLS consistency is enough to retain it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
6 of 20 current MLS entries list concrete slab (SLAB) as a construction/foundation type. There are no explicit mentions of 'concrete slab' in the public remarks, so inclusion is driven by MLS checkbox data for a minority of listings and lacks descriptive confirmation in agents' remarks.
No analysis available
13 of 20 current MLS entries list wood frame (WOOFRA). Public remarks mention wood finishes (e.g., 'cedarwood vaulted ceilings', 'wood flooring') but do not explicitly state 'wood frame construction', so evidence is primarily from MLS checkbox data across multiple listings and appears to be agent-supplied rather than described in remarks.
Zero of 20 listings explicitly mention above-ground construction, an above-ground building, or above-ground materials. Although 8/20 MLS records contain the ABOGRO checkbox, the lack of supporting remarks and the building's unchanged intrinsic construction suggest this is likely agent copy-paste or data-entry inconsistency.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for short-term rental, vacation rental, STR, NUC, TVU, hotel, and related terminology. Although some listings mention investment potential or rental demand, none affirmatively permit short-term rentals, and the reference to a long-term tenant does not establish STR permission.
No public remarks mention participation in a hotel rental pool or hotel rental program. Because STR is not supported, the prerequisite for hotel-pool participation is also not met.
The listings contain no evidence that owners must participate in a hotel rental program. Since neither STR permission nor hotel-pool participation is established, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks repeatedly identify Mawaena Kai units as leasehold with an expiration year of 2044. No later extension or conflicting lease-expiry year appears.
Public remarks explicitly state that VA-eligible buyers can assume a VA loan, strongly supporting VA financing availability in the building. This is direct, building-specific evidence.
The remarks were searched for “fully insured,” “full insurance,” “comprehensive building insurance,” “fully covered insurance,” and “walls-in coverage.” None of these insurance statements appeared, so full HOA insurance coverage is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for FLSE, fire/life safety evaluation, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, and passed fire inspection language. No such statements were found; the references to a gated or secure community do not establish that the building passed an FLSE.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are strongly confirmed across multiple listings and agents. At least 16 of 20 current listings contain mountain-view indicators, with remarks including "Koko Head," "Koko Crater," "mountain views," "unobstructed views of the mountains," and "mauka trade winds." The repeated specific references support a genuine building-level feature rather than isolated copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Marina views are overwhelmingly confirmed across the building. All 20 of 20 current listings contain marina-view indicators, and numerous remarks explicitly state "marina views," "marina-front," "panoramic views overlooking the Marina," and "direct waterfront access." The consistency across many listings and agents establishes this as a strong building-level feature.
Several listings explicitly mention sunrise views, including "Welcome the sunrise" and "glorious sunrise and moonrise views over Koko Head." Combined with 11 of 20 MLS records coded SUNRIS, this is solid evidence that some units in the building offer sunrise or eastern-facing views. The remarks appear to be genuine descriptions rather than a single agent's repeated checkbox behavior.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings describe marina, mountain, Koko Head, sunrise, and moonrise views, but none mention a fireworks view from the residences. Proximity to area attractions is not evidence of viewing fireworks from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported for this building. Historical MLS data shows RESMAN in 14 of 20 listings, and the current remarks include an explicit mention of a "resident manager," which aligns with the MLS flag rather than contradicting it. The evidence appears consistent across listings and does not look like a one-off agent copy-paste issue.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.