Mawaena Kai 1 and 2 and 3
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Mawaena Kai 1 and 2 and 3
Building Overview
Mawaena Kai 1, 2 & 3 in Hawaii Kai (built 1988) with concrete/wood construction, mountain views, and assigned covered parking.
About Mawaena Kai 1 and 2 and 3
Mawaena Kai 1 and 2 and 3 is a residential condominium complex located in the Hawaii Kai neighborhood. According to available records, the buildings were built in 1988 and constructed with a mix of concrete and wood frame components. Based on MLS data, units in the complex offer mountain views.
Key features reported in MLS data include a pet-friendly policy and a prohibition on short-term rentals. These are stated conditions from the listing data; buyers should confirm current rules with the association or management.
Parking at the complex is listed as available, covered, and assigned, with guest parking also noted. The management company is shown as unknown in the MLS data. Buyers are advised to verify parking arrangements, pet rules, rental restrictions, association fees, and management details with official HOA documents and the listing broker prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I reviewed all remarks for any explicit owner-occupancy percentage or descriptor and found none. Because owner_occupancy is a numeric field and there is no explicit numeric or clear textual evidence, the percentage is unknown and cannot be inferred.
I searched all public remarks for explicit elevator mentions (e.g., '4 elevators', 'elevator(s)', 'multiple elevators') and found none. With no prior/current numeric value present in the data and no explicit statement in the remarks, the number of elevators is unknown and cannot be inferred.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Multiple listings (MLS shows CABTV in 2 of 20 current entries) and at least one public remark explicitly state TV service is provided—e.g., “80+ TV channels, HBO Max…” as part of other fees. Evidence is explicit in agent remarks rather than only checkbox copy/paste, so inclusion is supported across listings.
Confidence 80%: 17 of 20 current MLS entries include OTCOEX (common area electricity) in association_fee_includes, and no remarks suggest owners pay separate common-area power.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There are no remarks claiming hot water is included and many listings note WTRHTR in inclusions (11 of 20), implying unit water heaters. With 0/20 HOTWAT checked and no remarks supporting building hot water, strong evidence indicates hot water is not included in maintenance.
At least one listing explicitly lists internet service as part of other fees—“Spectrum 1GB speed internet”—and MLS checkboxes reflect INTSER in 1 of 20 current entries. The direct agent remark provides clear evidence that internet is included for the building.
No analysis available
Several remarks explicitly identify a separate sewer fee (quotes: “Sewer fee is $130 bi-monthly” and “Other fees… are sewer fee and Marina fee”), indicating sewer is an additional charge, not included in maintenance. This direct language across listings supports exclusion.
MLS association_fee_includes lists WATER in 18 of 20 current entries (historical confidence ~82%). While public remarks do not frequently call out water explicitly, there is no remarkal contradiction and the high prevalence of the WATER checkbox across listings indicates water is included in the association fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although 5 of 20 current MLS listings have the CRWSH amenity checked, none of the public remarks across the listings mention a car wash, auto wash, vehicle wash area, or car wash station. With no explicit descriptions or multiple agents corroborating installation or existence, the evidence is weak and likely reflects inconsistent checkbox usage rather than a confirmed building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 97%: Many listings reference outdoor spaces such as a 'covered lanai,' 'spacious lanai,' 'enclosed back deck,' 'private entry courtyard,' and 'additional private courtyard off the master suite.'
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is consistently referenced across the building: MLS checkbox data lists storage in 8 of 20 amenity entries and 11 of 20 unit_feature entries, and numerous remarks explicitly note storage such as “built-in storage included,” “storage room is adjacent to covered parking spot,” “added carport storage,” and “separate private storage/attic storage.” Evidence appears across multiple listings and agents rather than being a single outlier, indicating the building offers storage/lockers.
Public remarks explicitly reference space for surfboards ('Plenty of space to store your surfboards too'), indicating that surfboard storage (in some form) is available within the property or its storage areas.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', etc. There are no pool references in the remarks; building context also lists pool=False, so salt pool is presumed not present (kept with low confidence due to lack of explicit denial).
18 of 20 current listings list WASHER/DRYER in inclusions and several remarks explicitly state in-unit laundry—quotes include "Full size washer and dryer", "washer/dryer", and "a dedicated laundry room." This evidence is strong across multiple listings and agents, so the building should be marked as offering in-unit laundry for some units.
No analysis available
Searched remarks for terms such as 'coin-op', 'paid laundry', 'card operated', or 'quarters'. There are no references to paid community laundry in the provided listing remarks.
Searched the public remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'floor-by-floor laundry', or 'laundry room on every floor'. No evidence was found indicating community laundry facilities on every floor.
All listings and MLS checkbox data indicate building parking is provided (MLS: 20/20 listings show parking features). Multiple remarks state 'two parking stalls', '3 parking spots' and 'this unit comes with 3 parking spots', confirming strong, consistent evidence across agents.
Many listings explicitly note assigned/reserved stalls (examples: 'Two assigned parking stalls', 'two assigned parking stalls (one covered)'). With 14/20 MLS records showing ASSIGN and multiple remarks across different listings, assigned parking is strongly supported.
Covered parking is consistently documented: MLS indicates 19/20 listings with covered/garage flags and many remarks state 'one covered', '1-covered + 2-open', or 'carport', showing strong agreement across listings.
Remarks describe assigned/ designated parking stalls (covered/open) across multiple listings but never claim the parking stalls are deeded. Boat slips/docks are explicitly called 'deeded', which suggests the term 'deeded' was used when applicable; no such language was used for parking.
No analysis available
There is no evidence in the remarks of a separate monthly parking fee. Marina fees are mentioned, but no parking-specific charge is described, so the monthly parking fee is unknown from these remarks.
Guest parking is supported by both MLS checkboxes (15/20) and remarks such as 'ample guest stalls throughout the property' and 'Lot of guest parking', indicating visitor parking is available throughout the complex.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for references to a parking waitlist or joining a waitlist but found none. Absence of mention suggests no waitlist system noted in listings (medium confidence).
No analysis available
Searched for explicit phrases indicating card/fob electronic access (e.g., 'key card access', 'fob access'). While listings note the community is gated/secured, there is no explicit mention of card/fob access systems in the public remarks.
No analysis available
Searched for 'security patrol', 'roving security', and related terms. Listings reference a gated/secured community and management but do not state there is a security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
16 of 20 current MLS listings list DOUWAL (double wall) in construction_materials and the prior summary rated this feature Medium confidence (~80%). Public remarks across the listings do not mention any contradiction or alternative wall construction; evidence is consistent across multiple agent listings and appears supported by MLS checkbox data rather than explicit remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 73%: 6 of 20 current MLS entries include SLAB in construction_materials, indicating at least some units/sections are on a concrete slab foundation.
No analysis available
Confidence 80%: 12 of 20 current MLS entries list WOOFRA (wood frame) in construction_materials.
Only 6 of 20 MLS entries include ABOGRO in construction_materials and none of the public remarks mention 'above ground' construction or materials. With no corroborating agent remarks and sparse MLS checkbox presence, this appears to be inconsistent or copy-paste data and not a building-wide feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for any language indicating short-term rental permission or restrictions and found none. Because there's no evidence either way in the public remarks, STR is marked as not allowed with medium confidence.
Listings contain no reference to participation in a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed program. Since STR was not indicated, hotel-pool participation is false.
There is no evidence of a mandatory rental-pool requirement in the public remarks. Multiple listings would typically specify if pool participation were required, but none do, so this is marked false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings repeatedly identify this as a leasehold property with the lease term ending in 2044. Where multiple dates appeared, 2044 was consistently referenced as the lease expiry/extension year.
Remarks explicitly reference an assumable VA loan and VA-eligible buyers, which is strong evidence VA financing is accepted for units in the building. I used the explicit quote as the basis for marking VA financing as allowed.
I searched the public remarks for explicit language indicating the HOA provides full/walls-in or comprehensive building insurance and found no such statements. With no current value to retain and no explicit mention, I report false with medium confidence due to lack of evidence.
No analysis available
I reviewed the remarks for explicit statements about a fire/life safety evaluation or passing an FLSE and found none. In the absence of any mention and no existing current value, I report false with medium confidence (absence in remarks suggests it likely isn't stated publicly).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence across listings supports mountain views: 5 of 20 listings have MOUNTA in view_descriptions and many remarks explicitly state phrases like 'Koko Head', 'Koko Crater', 'mountain views', and 'mauka trade winds'. The mentions appear across multiple agent remarks and align with prior high-confidence historical data, indicating building offers mountain-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence indicates marina views: 6 of 20 listings have MARCAN in view_descriptions and many remarks repeatedly say 'marina-front', 'panoramic views of the marina', 'direct marina access', and 'deeded boat dock'. These descriptions are widespread across listings and agents, confirming the building offers marina-view units.
Confidence 95%: Specific remarks mention sunrise views, such as 'Welcome the sunrise with views of the popular hike trail of Koko Head mountain from your lanai' and 'enjoy glorious sunrise and moonrise views over Koko Head from your back yard.'
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for phrases like 'fireworks view', 'see fireworks from lanai', or 'watch fireworks from unit'. Listings mention sunrise, moonrise, marina and mountain views but contain no statements about fireworks views from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
11 of 20 current MLS listings include the RESMAN amenity checkbox, but I found no phrases like 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or 'live-in manager' in any public remarks. The evidence is limited to agents checking the MLS amenity (likely copy/paste); no listings explicitly describe a building manager on the property, so confidence is moderate (0.70).
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.