Mawaena Kai 1 and 2 and 3
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Mawaena Kai 1 and 2 and 3
Building Overview
Mawaena Kai 1, 2 & 3 in Hawaii Kai (built 1988) with concrete/wood construction, mountain views, and assigned covered parking.
About Mawaena Kai 1 and 2 and 3
Mawaena Kai 1 and 2 and 3 is a residential condominium complex located in the Hawaii Kai neighborhood. According to available records, the buildings were built in 1988 and constructed with a mix of concrete and wood frame components. Based on MLS data, units in the complex offer mountain views.
Key features reported in MLS data include a pet-friendly policy and a prohibition on short-term rentals. These are stated conditions from the listing data; buyers should confirm current rules with the association or management.
Parking at the complex is listed as available, covered, and assigned, with guest parking also noted. The management company is shown as unknown in the MLS data. Buyers are advised to verify parking arrangements, pet rules, rental restrictions, association fees, and management details with official HOA documents and the listing broker prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I reviewed the remarks for an owner-occupancy percentage or wording like 'majority owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied' and found none. One listing mentions the building has 104 units and only 11 offer certain unique qualities, but that is not an owner-occupancy statement.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as '4 elevators,' 'multiple elevators,' or similar wording and found none. The listings focus on ground-floor access, parking, docks, and unit upgrades, but do not describe building elevator count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV appears to be included for at least some units in Mawaena Kai. The strongest evidence is the repeated remark listing "80+ TV channels" alongside Spectrum services, which reads like a copy-paste amenity description across multiple listings. Historical MLS data showing CABTV in 6/20 entries supports that this is a real building feature.
Common area electricity is supported mainly by MLS checkbox data rather than explicit marketing remarks. Fourteen of twenty current listings include OTCOEX, which is substantial, but the public remarks do not directly confirm the expense. This is likely a real building fee item, though the evidence is a bit more administrative than descriptive.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in the maintenance fee for this building. Current MLS data is strongly against it: 0/20 listings mark HOTWAT, while many list WTRHTR, and remarks specifically reference a water heater as a unit appliance. The evidence suggests past hot-water inclusion was a checkbox/data-entry error rather than a building amenity.
Internet service is confirmed by direct public remarks: "Spectrum 1GB speed internet." The same wording appears to be reused across multiple listings, suggesting a standard included fee rather than a one-off note. Current MLS data also shows INTSER in 5 of 20 listings, which aligns with the remarks.
No analysis available
Sewer charges are referenced in both remarks and MLS data. At least one listing explicitly mentions a separate sewer fee, and current MLS data shows SEWER in 4 of 20 entries, indicating this cost is part of the community's recurring fee structure. The evidence is moderate but consistent.
Water is very likely included in the association or maintenance fees for Mawaena Kai. Seventeen of twenty current MLS entries mark WATER, which is strong building-level evidence. The public remarks do not contradict this, so the feature remains high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the reviewed remarks mention a car wash, auto wash, or vehicle wash area, despite 7 of 20 MLS entries carrying the CRWSH amenity flag. The public remarks repeatedly focus on marina access, boat docks, parking, and storage, which makes the car wash flag look unsupported and likely erroneous.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building offers patios/decks: over 15 of the current listing remarks explicitly mention outdoor spaces (phrases include "covered lanai", "private lanai", "3 private courtyards", and "enclosed back patio"). References to covered lanais, multiple lanais, yards, and decks appear across numerous agent listings and listings from different agents, indicating a genuine building feature rather than a single copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate-to-strong evidence that some units have private yard space: at least 4 separate remarks explicitly note 'exclusive direct lawn access ... deeded solely for the use of this first-floor residence,' 'private, completely fenced, uncovered lanai area,' and 'private entry courtyard' or 'private courtyard off the master suite.' These explicit descriptions across multiple listings indicate private yard/deeded private outdoor spaces exist for some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is consistently confirmed across the listing remarks, appearing in many of the examples provided. Agents describe multiple forms of storage such as "built-in storage," "walk-in storage room," "separate private storage," and "added attic storage," which strongly supports that the building offers storage units/lockers or additional storage space. The evidence is broad and repeated across multiple listings rather than a one-off mention.
There is direct public-remarks evidence for surfboard storage. One listing explicitly says there is "plenty of space to store your surfboards too," which is strong evidence that the building/unit supports surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for saltwater pool, salt pool, saline pool, and similar wording, but found no matches. The current building context also says there is no pool, so there is no basis to mark a salt pool.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported for this building. Historical MLS data shows washer/dryer included in 19 of 20 recent listings, and multiple current remarks explicitly mention "Full size washer and dryer," "washer/dryer," and a "dedicated laundry room." This appears to be consistent across multiple agents rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
I looked for coin laundry, paid laundry, quarters, card-operated machines, laundry fees, or coin-op wording and found no public-remarks evidence. The remarks describe in-unit laundry features in some listings, but do not indicate a paid community laundry setup.
I searched the remarks for language like laundry on every floor, laundry room on each floor, or floor-by-floor laundry facilities and found nothing explicit. The listings mention laundry in individual units and a dedicated laundry room in one unit, but not community laundry on every floor.
Parking is clearly present across the building. Multiple listings mention specific allocations such as “two assigned parking stalls,” “three (3) assigned parking stalls,” “3 parking stalls,” and “2 parking spaces,” which strongly confirms the feature across many units and agents.
Assigned/reserved parking is well supported by both MLS flags and remarks. The wording is consistent across multiple listings, including “assigned parking stalls,” “deeded parking,” and “designated parking,” indicating this is not just copy-paste checkbox noise.
Covered parking is strongly supported. Multiple remarks mention covered stalls or carport parking, including phrases like “two assigned parking stalls (one covered),” “1-covered + 1-open,” and “3 (1 covered, 2 open),” which aligns with the high-confidence MLS pattern.
Several listings explicitly describe the parking as deeded, indicating owned parking rights rather than merely assigned or rented stalls. The wording is repeated across multiple remarks, making this highly reliable.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for parking-fee language such as monthly parking cost, parking rental, or added stall charges and found none. The listings mention parking stalls and various other fees, but nothing indicating a parking-specific monthly fee.
Guest parking is supported by both MLS flags and agent remarks. Several listings mention ample or lots of guest stalls/parking for visitors, so this appears to be a genuine building-level feature rather than a one-off note.
Secured-entry parking is implied by consistent remarks about the development being gated and secure, though explicit parking-secured-access wording is less common than the parking counts. The evidence appears across many listings and multiple agents, suggesting a genuine building-level secured parking/access environment rather than a single-agent copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, joining a list, or limited parking requiring a queue, and found nothing. The remarks consistently describe included or assigned stalls instead.
No analysis available
I looked for key card entry, fob access, card reader, electronic access, or keycard wording in the remarks and found none. The listings do describe the community as gated, secure, or secured, but that is not the same as card-access security.
No analysis available
I searched for security patrol, roving security, patrol service, or patrolled building language and found nothing. The remarks mention gated and secure access, but do not indicate a patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is overwhelming evidence that this building offers split AC in at least some units. Multiple independent listings mention it directly, and the remarks include specific installation/upgrade details, which strongly supports that this is a real building feature rather than copy-paste checkbox noise. This is consistent with the historical MLS signal and is confirmed by many distinct recent remarks.
No public remarks mention window or wall air-conditioning units despite 3 of 20 MLS inclusions listing ACWIUN; absence from all remarks suggests the few MLS checks may be agent checkbox variance or copy/paste. Given the lack of corroborating remarks, the building should not be promoted as having window AC as a building-level feature.
No analysis available
Double-wall construction appears to be a real building feature. The current MLS data shows 16 of 20 listings marked DOUWAL, which is a strong building-level signal and likely reflects repeated accurate entry rather than a one-off copy/paste error. Public remarks do not call it out, but the MLS consistency is enough to retain it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
6 of 20 current MLS entries list concrete slab (SLAB) as a construction/foundation type. There are no explicit mentions of 'concrete slab' in the public remarks, so inclusion is driven by MLS checkbox data for a minority of listings and lacks descriptive confirmation in agents' remarks.
No analysis available
13 of 20 current MLS entries list wood frame (WOOFRA). Public remarks mention wood finishes (e.g., 'cedarwood vaulted ceilings', 'wood flooring') but do not explicitly state 'wood frame construction', so evidence is primarily from MLS checkbox data across multiple listings and appears to be agent-supplied rather than described in remarks.
Above-ground construction is not supported by the remarks: none of the provided listings mention 'above ground' construction, materials, or a similar verified site-specific description. Although 7 of 20 current MLS records have ABOGRO checked, that level of adoption is still fairly low and looks more like inconsistent MLS entry than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR indicators such as short-term rental allowed, legal vacation rental, NUC/TVU, or hotel-style rental language and found none. With no evidence of STR approval in the public remarks, the building is treated as not allowing STRs based on this dataset.
I looked for hotel-pool language such as Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, hotel rental program, or managed-by-hotel wording and found none. Since there is also no evidence that STRs are allowed, this must be false.
I searched for wording like mandatory hotel pool, required rental program, cannot opt out, or must be rented and found nothing. There is also no evidence of STR approval, so this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings consistently identify the property as leasehold with a 2044 expiration. No later extension or conflicting lease-end year appears in the remarks, so 2044 is the supported lease expiry year.
Public remarks explicitly mention VA-eligible buyers and an assumable VA loan, which strongly supports VA financing being accepted for this building. I found no conflicting language in the listings.
I searched for insurance-related terms indicating fully insured HOA coverage or walls-in insurance, such as 'fully insured' or 'comprehensive building insurance,' and found no such language. The remarks discuss fees and amenities, but not the building's insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for references to a fire/life safety evaluation, fire inspection pass, FLSE compliance, or similar safety-certification language and found nothing. The remarks mention the community is gated, secure, and well managed, but that is not evidence of a passed fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across many listings supports mountain views in this building. Roughly a dozen-plus remarks explicitly mention 'Koko Head,' 'Koko Crater,' 'mountain views,' or 'mauka' views from lanais and primary suites. The consistency across multiple agents and repeated unit types makes this a very reliable building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Marina views are strongly supported across the listings, with almost every remark referencing 'marina-front,' 'marina views,' or direct waterfront/marina access. The evidence appears broad and repeated across multiple agents, not just a single copied description. This is a core building-level feature buyers would clearly search for.
Several listings explicitly mention sunrise views, including "Welcome the sunrise" and "glorious sunrise and moonrise views over Koko Head." Combined with 11 of 20 MLS records coded SUNRIS, this is solid evidence that some units in the building offer sunrise or eastern-facing views. The remarks appear to be genuine descriptions rather than a single agent's repeated checkbox behavior.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for direct statements about fireworks views from the unit or lanai, such as being able to watch fireworks from the home, and found none. The remarks focus on marina, mountain, Koko Head, and waterfront views instead.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported for this building. Historical MLS data shows RESMAN in 14 of 20 listings, and the current remarks include an explicit mention of a "resident manager," which aligns with the MLS flag rather than contradicting it. The evidence appears consistent across listings and does not look like a one-off agent copy-paste issue.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.