Mawaena Kai 1 and 2 and 3
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Mawaena Kai 1 and 2 and 3
Building Overview
Mawaena Kai 1, 2 & 3 in Hawaii Kai (built 1988) with concrete/wood construction, mountain views, and assigned covered parking.
About Mawaena Kai 1 and 2 and 3
Mawaena Kai 1 and 2 and 3 is a residential condominium complex located in the Hawaii Kai neighborhood. According to available records, the buildings were built in 1988 and constructed with a mix of concrete and wood frame components. Based on MLS data, units in the complex offer mountain views.
Key features reported in MLS data include a pet-friendly policy and a prohibition on short-term rentals. These are stated conditions from the listing data; buyers should confirm current rules with the association or management.
Parking at the complex is listed as available, covered, and assigned, with guest parking also noted. The management company is shown as unknown in the MLS data. Buyers are advised to verify parking arrangements, pet rules, rental restrictions, association fees, and management details with official HOA documents and the listing broker prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked through all remarks for explicit owner-occupancy percentages or descriptive statements about owner-occupancy and found none. Because there is no explicit numeric information and no current value provided, the owner-occupancy percentage remains unknown and cannot be estimated from the remarks.
I searched all provided public remarks for any reference to elevators (terms like 'elevator', 'elevators', 'four elevators', 'multiple elevators') and found none. Because there is no explicit numeric statement and no current numeric value provided, the number of elevators is unknown and cannot be inferred from the remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Evidence that some units/building fees include cable: MLS shows CABTV in several current entries (3/20) and at least one public remark explicitly advertises '80+ TV channels' and bundled streaming/TV services. The mention appears in agent remarks (not obviously copy-paste across all listings), so buyers should know the building offers included TV service for some units.
16 of 20 current MLS entries list OTCOEX (common area electricity) in association_fee_includes, and no public remarks explicitly state owners pay common-area power. Multiple agents' listings consistently include OTCOEX, suggesting building maintenance fees generally cover common area electricity, though remarks rarely mention it directly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
High confidence that hot water is not included in maintenance fees: MLS checkboxes show no HOTWAT entries (0/20) and a majority of unit listings include 'WTRHTR' (water heater) in unit inclusions, indicating hot water is provided by in-unit heaters rather than a building-wide service.
Some units/building fees include internet: MLS shows INTSER in a small number of listings (2/20) and agent remarks explicitly advertise 'Spectrum 1GB speed internet' included with other fees, providing direct evidence that internet is included for some units.
No analysis available
Multiple listings reference sewer charges: 3/20 current MLS entries explicitly list SEWER in association_fee_includes, one remark states "Other fees, in addition to maintenance fee are sewer fee and Marina fee for a combined total of approximately $109," while another lists "Sewer fee is $130 bi-monthly." Evidence is mixed across agents (some indicate sewer included, others show a separate sewer fee), but there is sufficient consistent indication that some units/building entries include sewer in fees, so the building should be marked as offering sewer-included maintenance for some units.
Majority-MLS evidence that water is included for many units: 17 of 20 current MLS entries mark WATER in association_fee_includes. Although remarks seldom call it out directly, the consistent MLS checkbox presence across most listings suggests water is included in association fees for many units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although 5/20 current MLS listings show the CRWSH amenity checked, none of the 20 public remarks mention a car wash, auto wash, or vehicle wash area. Given the lack of any explicit remarks describing a building car-wash facility and prior Medium confidence, the checked amenity appears to be inconsistent and likely a copy/paste error rather than evidence that the building has a car wash.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across listings for patios/decks: at least ~15 remarks mention outdoor living spaces such as 'covered lanai,' 'spacious lanai,' 'covered back lanai,' 'enclosed back deck,' or 'private entry courtyard.' Historical MLS checkbox data also showed PATDEC/COVPAT on multiple listings, and current agent remarks consistently describe covered lanais and decks across many units, indicating the building offers patio/deck amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate-to-strong evidence that some units have private yard space: at least 4 separate remarks explicitly note 'exclusive direct lawn access ... deeded solely for the use of this first-floor residence,' 'private, completely fenced, uncovered lanai area,' and 'private entry courtyard' or 'private courtyard off the master suite.' These explicit descriptions across multiple listings indicate private yard/deeded private outdoor spaces exist for some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is consistently referenced: current remarks explicitly mention 'built-in storage', 'attic storage', 'storage room', 'ample storage', and 'separate private storage' across multiple listings (consistent with MLS checkbox data showing storage in ~10–12 of 20 listings). Evidence is strong and appears across many agent listings rather than a single copy/paste, so the building offers storage/lockers.
I searched for 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', or similar. At least one listing explicitly states there is ample space to store surfboards, indicating surfboard storage is available.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', or similar terms. While some listings note a community pool exists, none specify the pool is salt water, so there is no evidence the pool (if present) is saline.
Strong evidence that some units have in-unit laundry: historical MLS inclusions indicate 19 of 20 listings included washer/dryer. Multiple current remarks explicitly state "Full size washer and dryer", "washer/dryer", and reference a "dedicated laundry room", showing consistent confirmation across different listings and agents.
No analysis available
I looked for terms such as 'coin laundry', 'coin-op', 'paid laundry', 'card operated', or 'quarters'. The remarks discuss in-unit washers/dryers and do not indicate any paid community laundry facilities.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', or 'floor-by-floor laundry'. Multiple listings mention in-unit washer/dryer or a dedicated laundry room, but there is no evidence of community laundry facilities provided on every floor.
Strong evidence across all listings that the building provides parking: MLS data flags parking on 20/20 listings and many public remarks describe stalls (examples: 'four deeded parking stalls', 'two designated parking stalls', 'three assigned parking stalls'). Multiple agents independently note assigned/deeded parking, indicating the feature is widely available and not likely copy-paste error.
Many listings (MLS: 14/20) and numerous public remarks explicitly mention assigned/reserved stalls (e.g., 'Two assigned parking stalls', 'Three (3) assigned parking stalls with built-in storage'), supporting that assigned parking is available in the building.
High-confidence evidence that covered parking exists: 19/20 MLS listings flag covered/garage parking and many public remarks explicitly mention covered stalls or carports (quotes include '1-covered + 1-open', 'one covered w/ added attic', '1-covered + 2-open'). Coverage is consistently noted across multiple listings and agents, confirming covered parking is available in the building.
Some listings explicitly describe parking stalls as deeded (not just assigned); multiple remarks reference deeded stalls, so parking being deeded is supported in the public remarks.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit references to parking fees (monthly parking charge, rental, additional parking cost) and found none in the remarks, so the monthly parking fee is unknown from public remarks.
Both MLS data (15/20) and remarks support guest parking availability; listings call out 'ample guest stalls' and 'lot of guest parking', indicating visitor spaces are provided across the property.
Implied evidence for secured parking: MLS shows SECENT on 6/20 listings and several remarks repeatedly describe the development as 'gated' or 'secured gated community'. While direct mentions of gated parking access are implied rather than consistently explicit, multiple agents reference gated/secure community entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for 'waitlist', 'waiting list', or similar phrases related to parking and found no references; absence of mention suggests there is not a parking waitlist but is not definitive.
No analysis available
I searched for 'key card', 'fob access', 'card reader', and 'electronic access'. The remarks emphasize gated/secure community but contain no explicit references to card/fob entry systems.
No analysis available
I searched for terms indicating a security patrol service. The public remarks reference gated security and good management but do not mention any patrol or roving security service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence that some units have split (ductless/mini-split) AC: 11 of 20 MLS inclusions show ACSPL and at least 5–6 separate public remarks explicitly reference split or Mitsubishi split A/C installations (quotes include 'Three new split A/C's added' and 'split air conditioning units installed in 2020'). Multiple agents/remarks confirm the feature rather than a single copy/paste, so inclusion is warranted for buyers seeking split AC units.
No public remarks mention window or wall air-conditioning units despite 3 of 20 MLS inclusions listing ACWIUN; absence from all remarks suggests the few MLS checks may be agent checkbox variance or copy/paste. Given the lack of corroborating remarks, the building should not be promoted as having window AC as a building-level feature.
No analysis available
16 of 20 current MLS entries include the DOUWAL (double-wall) construction checkbox, but none of the public remarks explicitly state 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction' — remarks mention 'double pane windows' but not double walls. The prevalence of the MLS checkbox suggests the building may have double-wall construction, but the absence of any explicit mention in agent remarks indicates this should be confirmed with owner/property manager or a site visit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
6 of 20 current MLS entries list concrete slab (SLAB) as a construction/foundation type. There are no explicit mentions of 'concrete slab' in the public remarks, so inclusion is driven by MLS checkbox data for a minority of listings and lacks descriptive confirmation in agents' remarks.
No analysis available
13 of 20 current MLS entries list wood frame (WOOFRA). Public remarks mention wood finishes (e.g., 'cedarwood vaulted ceilings', 'wood flooring') but do not explicitly state 'wood frame construction', so evidence is primarily from MLS checkbox data across multiple listings and appears to be agent-supplied rather than described in remarks.
7 of 20 MLS entries include above-ground construction (ABOGRO), but public remarks do not use phrases like 'above ground construction' and mostly describe unit location (ground-floor/second-floor) rather than construction method. The feature is included based on MLS checkbox presence for some units, though descriptive confirmation in remarks is absent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR-related phrases and found none. Because remarks do not state STR is permitted, the conservative determination is that STR is not indicated/allowed (medium confidence).
No listing mentions a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed program. As STR was not indicated, hotel-pool participation cannot be true and is set to false.
Listings do not reference any required or mandatory hotel/rental-pool participation. With no STR allowance indicated, mandatory pool participation is set to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly state the property is leasehold with the lease expiring in 2044; where multiple listings mention dates, 2044 is the consistent expiry year.
Multiple listings explicitly reference an assumable VA loan and VA-eligible buyers; public remarks indicate VA financing is available/assumable.
I searched the remarks for explicit statements that the HOA fully insures the building (walls-in/full insurance/comprehensive building insurance) and found no references. With no mention and no owner verification, the field is set to false with medium confidence per the rules (absence in remarks likely means not stated).
No analysis available
I reviewed the remarks for explicit language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation (e.g., 'FLSE passed', 'fire life safety evaluation passed') and found none. In the absence of any mention and with no current verification provided, I default to false with medium confidence (absence of mention makes certification unlikely in the remarks).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence across listings supports mountain views: 5 of 20 listings have MOUNTA in view_descriptions and many remarks explicitly state phrases like 'Koko Head', 'Koko Crater', 'mountain views', and 'mauka trade winds'. The mentions appear across multiple agent remarks and align with prior high-confidence historical data, indicating building offers mountain-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence: numerous listings explicitly state marina-facing features—phrases include 'marina-front', 'direct marina access', 'private/deeded boat dock', and 'marina views'. Historical MLS summary already rated marina views as high confidence; current remarks across multiple agents consistently mention marina frontage and boat slips, indicating building-level marina views are broadly available.
Solid evidence: several listings explicitly reference morning/sunrise viewing—examples: 'Welcome the sunrise with views of...Koko Head' and 'glorious sunrise and moonrise views over Koko Head'. Combined with prior high-confidence historical data, this supports that the building offers units with sunrise views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit mentions like 'watch fireworks from lanai', 'fireworks view', or 'see fireworks from unit'. The listings describe marina, sunrise, and moonrise views but contain no statements about fireworks being visible from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS amenities include RESMAN on 11/20 current listings, but 0 public remarks contain phrases like 'resident manager' or 'on-site manager'. Evidence is mixed: multiple agents have checked the RESMAN box (suggesting the building may have an on-site manager), but lack of explicit mentions in remarks and potential copy/paste reduce certainty, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.