Mariners Village 3
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Mariners Village 3
Building Overview
Mariners Village 3 in Hawaii Kai (1972) — concrete/wood construction with mountain views, pool, BBQ area and resident manager.
About Mariners Village 3
Mariners Village 3 is located in the Hawaii Kai neighborhood and was built in 1972. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete and wood frame and offers mountain views.
Based on MLS data, building amenities include a pool, BBQ area, and a resident manager. Units are reported to have window air conditioning. Pets are allowed, and short-term rentals are not permitted per the available information.
Parking information from MLS lists covered, assigned stalls and guest parking. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records, and no HOA fee or assessment details were provided. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, policies, and fees with the listing agent or management prior to any transaction.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for an explicit owner-occupancy percentage or descriptive language about owner occupancy, but found none. Without a stated percentage or clear qualitative indicator, the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown.
I searched all the public remarks for explicit elevator references and found none. Since this is a townhouse community and the remarks repeatedly discuss carports, lanais, pool, and clubhouse instead, there is no evidence to infer an elevator count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included in the association fees. The MLS pattern is strong: 15 of 19 current listings show OTCOEX, and prior records already supported this with high confidence. No remarks suggest a change, so this looks like a stable building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the available listings, hot water inclusion is not supported: 0/20 current MLS records have HOTWAT checked, while 19/20 show WTRHTR in inclusions. None of the public remarks explicitly say hot water is included, so the historical MLS pattern remains the strongest evidence.
Internet service is rarely marked as included (3 of 17 listings) and is never mentioned in remarks as part of the maintenance fee. Given the lack of consistent MLS coding or textual confirmation, internet is very unlikely to be an HOA-included utility.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is not supported by the current record. Just 2 of 19 listings check SEWER, and the public remarks are silent on sewer coverage. This looks more like inconsistent MLS input than a confirmed building-level benefit.
Water appears to be included in the association fees based on 17/20 current MLS listings showing WATER. The public remarks do not explicitly mention water, but there is no conflicting evidence, and the MLS consistency is strong across multiple listings/agents.
BBQ facilities are strongly supported across the listing set. Several remarks explicitly mention a "BBQ area" and "BBQ's and get-togethers," which aligns with the high-frequency MLS amenity data (17 of 20 listings). This looks like consistent building/community-level amenity information rather than a one-off agent copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Clubhouse availability is strongly confirmed. Listings repeatedly say "clubhouse," "club house," and "entertain at the clubhouse," and the MLS data shows 18 of 20 listings with the clubhouse amenity checked. This is robust multi-listing evidence for a shared community facility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no persuasive evidence of a distinct meeting room in the public remarks. Across the listings, agents consistently mention a rec room, party room, and clubhouse, but not a separate meeting or conference room. This looks like an MLS checkbox that may have been inferred from other shared spaces rather than a true dedicated meeting room.
Patio/deck amenities are well supported for Mariners Village 3. Multiple listings mention "lanai," "covered lanai," "private outdoor courtyard," and a "large patio area out back," with roughly a dozen remarks referencing outdoor spaces. The evidence is consistent across several listings and appears to be genuine building-level availability, not just one-off wording.
There is clear evidence of walking/jogging path access in the community. One listing explicitly notes "all the open grass areas and walking paths," which directly matches the feature definition, and MLS history shows the amenity in multiple listings. This appears to be a real shared community feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence suggests a shared recreation area or recreation space, though it is not described as consistently as BBQ or clubhouse. Multiple listings mention a "rec room," "party room," and broad community open space/green areas, which aligns with a recreation amenity. This is moderate-strength support, not overwhelming.
The building appears to have a community recreation/party room. Multiple remarks reference a "recently renovated community rec room above the large community pool" and another notes a "party room," which is consistent with the MLS rec room history. The repeated wording suggests a real shared amenity, not just a checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is well supported across multiple current listings and appears to be a real building/unit feature rather than a one-off agent checkbox. At least 4-5 remarks explicitly mention storage, using phrases such as "extra storage beneath the home," "generous storage," and "additional storage space." This is consistent with the historical MLS data, so the feature should be included with high confidence.
The remarks explicitly reference storage space for surf boards, which is strong evidence for surfboard storage. This is consistent with the multiple mentions of carport/storage areas in the listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool feature is very well supported for Mariners Village III. Multiple listings mention it directly, with phrases like "large community pool," "huge sparkling pool," "Olympic size pool," and "take a dip in the huge Mariners Village 3 pool." This appears consistent across many agents and is reinforced by the current MLS amenities data.
There is explicit public-remarks evidence that the building’s community pool is heated, with one listing calling it a "large heated pool." This appears in addition to multiple generic pool references, so the heated aspect is supported by direct text even though the MLS heated flag is sparse.
I searched for explicit salt-water pool language. The remarks repeatedly confirm a large community pool, but none of them identify it as a saltwater pool.
Very strong evidence supports in-unit laundry for Mariners Village 3. Multiple current listings explicitly say "washer/dryer in the unit" and one says "washer/dryer hookups in the unit," while the prior MLS data was already high confidence at 18/20 listings with WASHER/DRYER included. This appears consistent across multiple listings and agents rather than a one-off or copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit references to coin laundry, paid laundry, or laundry machines requiring payment. Nothing in the remarks suggests a paid community laundry facility, and the only laundry references are to in-unit equipment or hookups.
I searched for wording like laundry on each floor, community laundry, or floor-by-floor laundry, but the remarks only mention in-unit washer/dryer, laundry hookups, and a laundry nook. That points away from a shared laundry setup on every floor.
Parking is clearly supported across the building. Across the current listings, 20/20 show parking-related MLS features, and the remarks repeatedly describe two parking stalls, 2-car carports, or covered parking. This is consistent across many agents and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
Assigned parking is strongly supported. Multiple listings explicitly state 'assigned parking stalls,' including details like stalls directly across from the front door, which is strong building-level evidence rather than a generic checkbox. The current MLS data also supports this with 12/20 listings marked ASSIGN.
Covered parking is strongly supported: roughly 10+ listings explicitly mention a covered 2-car carport or '2-car carport' attached to the unit (quotes include “A covered 2-car carport” and “enter from your ground-level 2-car covered carport”). This confirmation across numerous remarks and prior MLS checkbox data indicates high confidence that the building offers covered parking.
I searched for deeded-parking language like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed" and found no explicit match. The listings consistently say "assigned parking stalls" or "2-car carport," which suggests assigned parking rather than deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I looked for parking fee language such as a monthly parking charge, additional parking cost, or parking rental and found none. The remarks mention assigned stalls, carports, and guest parking, but no separate parking fee.
Guest parking is well documented for this building. Roughly 15/20 current listings carry the guest-parking indicator, and multiple remarks independently describe plentiful, ample, or lots of guest and street parking. The evidence is broad and consistent across listings, suggesting this is a real shared feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for "parking waitlist," "parking waiting list," or similar wording and found nothing. The parking descriptions instead emphasize assigned stalls and a carport, which does not indicate a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I looked for card/fob/electronic access terms and found none. The only security-related information in the remarks is a resident manager in the building context, not a card-access system.
No analysis available
I searched for any evidence of patrol service or roving security and found nothing. The remarks do mention an on-site resident manager in the building context, but that is not the same as security patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is supported by both the MLS inclusions history and multiple current remarks. At least 2 listings explicitly say 'window AC throughout' or reference 'AC's,' which reinforces that units in this building have window air conditioning units. The evidence is strong and consistent, so this feature should remain included.
MLS construction_materials indicates concrete (CONCRE) in 4 of 17 current listings, suggesting some level of concrete construction in the project. Public remarks do not explicitly mention concrete, so this is treated as moderate, checkbox-based evidence rather than remark-verified. The feature is included with moderate confidence based primarily on recurring MLS data from multiple agents.
Double wall construction is consistently shown across all current MLS records (20 of 20), which makes this a very strong building-level feature. Even though the public remarks do not spell it out, the MLS consistency strongly supports it as a building characteristic.
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco appears in a minority of current MLS records (7 of 20), so it looks like a partial building-level checkbox rather than a universally confirmed feature. None of the provided public remarks explicitly describe masonry or stucco, so the evidence is MLS-based only and somewhat mixed.
No analysis available
Some listings (3/15) explicitly indicate slab construction in the MLS data, and unit remarks mention structural supports, foundation work, and settling over 50+ years. Together this supports that at least some portions of the complex are built on a slab foundation, which is relevant for buyers searching for slab-built properties.
No analysis available
Wood frame appears in a majority of the current MLS records (11 of 19), but the public remarks do not directly confirm it. The evidence looks like MLS checkbox data rather than repeated agent description, so confidence is moderate rather than high.
Above-ground construction appears in a subset of current MLS records (9 of 20), suggesting it may apply to some or most units in the building. The remarks focus on layout, lanais, parking, and repairs, but do not explicitly confirm above-ground construction, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as "STR permitted," "vacation rental allowed," "NUC," or "TVU" and found no evidence. Nothing in the remarks suggests short-term rentals are allowed in this building.
I looked for hotel pool references like "hotel rental program," "managed by hotel," or brand pool participation and found none. Since there is no STR approval language in the remarks, this must remain false.
I searched for wording such as "mandatory pool," "required to participate," or "cannot opt out" and found nothing. With no hotel/STR rental program referenced, there is no basis to mark mandatory participation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold wording and specific expiration dates such as "lease expires 2050" or "ground lease ends in ____" and found none. The remarks read like standard condo/townhome marketing and do not provide any lease expiry year.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," or "VA loans accepted" and found nothing. The listings do discuss parking, amenities, and repairs, but nothing about loan eligibility.
There is direct public-remark evidence that the building/HOA is fully insured. The wording is explicit and reinforced by the insurance-related HOA fee comments, so this is high confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit fire/life safety language across the remarks, but nothing referenced a fire/life safety evaluation or inspection pass. Because there is no direct evidence in the remarks, this is treated as not indicated by the listings.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are strongly supported across the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention "mountain views," "Koko Crater," "Koko Head," and sunrise/mountain outlooks from lanais, while the MLS view data is overwhelmingly consistent (19 of 20 current listings show mountain-related views). This looks like a true building-level feature, not just agent copy-paste, because the remarks from different listings independently repeat the same view descriptions.
No analysis available
There is limited evidence for city views: 2 of 19 current MLS listings include CITY in the view descriptions, but no public remarks explicitly describe city, downtown, or skyline views. This is a low-confidence building-level indicator and may reflect inconsistent MLS input rather than a strong, commonly advertised feature.
No analysis available
Garden/landscape views appear to be a real feature in this building. Eight of 19 current listings show GARDEN in the MLS view descriptions, and remarks reinforce this with phrases like “backs onto a lush, expansive green space,” “surrounded by lush green grass areas,” and “a backdrop of greenery and landscape elements.” The consistency across multiple listings suggests this is more than agent copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks for several units note sunrise exposure, including wording like 'stunning sunrises,' 'mountain and sunrise views,' and 'views of Koko Crater and sunrises to the east.' These references come from multiple listings and agents and match current MLS view data, supporting that Mariners Village 3 offers sunrise-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for direct statements about seeing Friday night fireworks from the building, unit, or lanai. The remarks mention scenic mountain, crater, and sunrise views, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
The resident manager feature is strongly supported. Historical MLS data shows RESMAN in 16 of 20 listings, and at least one current public remark explicitly says "on site Res. Mgr." This looks like a real building amenity rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.