Marina Towers

All available MLS records for this building report 1967 as the construction year. The remarks focus on remodeling but never mention a different build or completion date, supporting 1967 as the correct year built.

The penthouse listing is on floor 15, the highest MLS floor field is 15, and the county records max_floors as 15. The state registration's 16-floor field is set aside as unreliable.

The state registration reports 108 units for this single-building registration, and the county's CPR count and dwell sum also indicate 108. The county reconciled_units value of 107 is inconsistent with those figures and is set aside.

Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 45. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.

The remarks were searched for references to elevators, lifts, multiple elevators, and specific elevator counts. None were found, so the current value of 2 is retained with low confidence because there is no evidence in the remarks to confirm or deny it.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

All 14 listings leave the central AC–included checkbox blank, and remarks consistently talk about AC as an optional/unit-level feature that can be installed. There is no mention of a central building AC system or of AC being part of the maintenance fee. This strongly indicates that central air conditioning is not included in the association fees.

At least 2 listings explicitly say, "The HOA Fee even includes cable tv," while current MLS data supports inclusion in 17 of 19 listings. This is consistent with the previously high-confidence determination and appears to reflect a building-level benefit rather than an isolated agent entry.

No public remarks specifically mention common-area electricity, common electric, or building power. However, current MLS data consistently lists OTCOEX in 15 of 19 listings, providing moderate-to-strong building-level support consistent with the prior medium-confidence assessment.

Across all 14 MLS listings, the cooperative taxes–included field is never checked. Remarks present the property as a standard fee-simple condo in Waikiki, with no mention of co-op arrangements or co-op tax obligations. This gives very high confidence that cooperative taxes are not part of the maintenance fee.

None of the listings indicate electricity as an included association-fee item in the MLS. Public remarks never say 'electricity included' or similar, which is typically highlighted when present. Given the consistent omission and local norms, unit electricity appears to be separately metered and not included in maintenance fees.

All available MLS records leave the gas-included field unchecked. None of the marketing comments reference gas lines, gas ranges, or gas utilities included in maintenance fees. This strongly indicates that gas, if present at all, is not an HOA-covered utility.

No public remarks state that hot water is included, and one listing specifically mentions a brand new hot water heater. The overwhelming WTRHTR pattern in current MLS data supports correcting or retaining this as false despite the isolated HOTWAT entry.

At least 2 listings explicitly say, "The HOA Fee even includes ... internet," with current MLS support in 18 of 19 listings. The repeated direct wording and strong cross-listing consistency confirm this as a building-level inclusion.

The listings highlight proximity to 'Marinas' and 'Yacht Clubs' but do not suggest that the building’s fees cover marina access or slip costs. MLS fee-inclusion fields for marina are consistently blank (0 of 14). This combination indicates that any marina use is separate and not part of the maintenance fee.

No public remarks explicitly mention sewer, but current MLS data lists SEWER in 18 of 19 listings. The consistency across listings strongly supports inclusion, with no contradictory remarks or evidence of a listing-specific exception.

The provided remarks do not explicitly state that water is included. Nevertheless, WATER is present in 18 of 19 current MLS records, making the evidence highly consistent and supportive of inclusion in the maintenance fee.

At least 15 listings explicitly mention BBQ facilities, including "BBQ's," "BBQ area," "barbecue area," and "BBQ/lounge area." The widespread agreement across agents and the 18-of-19 MLS frequency provide very strong evidence that the building offers shared grilling facilities.

Public remarks for about 9 of 14 listings repeatedly describe on-site bicycle storage, using phrases like 'Locked Bicycle ... Storage rooms', 'Bike rack/storage', and 'dedicated bicycle and surfboard storage rooms'. The consistency and specificity of these descriptions across multiple agents show that Marina Towers offers common bicycle storage/bike rack facilities accessible to residents, even though agents are not checking the formal MLS bike-storage amenity box.

The building is near marinas and the Ala Wai canal, but amenities are presented as proximity rather than ownership of docks. With no mention of slips or docking and MLS unchecked, the property does not have a boat dock or marina facility.

Car wash facilities are repeatedly listed in the public remarks, not just the MLS checkbox data. Combined with the strong historical pattern, this supports a real building-level car wash amenity.

Agents consistently enumerate the building’s amenities without ever mentioning a clubhouse or community center. This absence, combined with unchecked MLS data, strongly suggests there is no clubhouse.

The building is portrayed as well-managed but not as having hotel-style concierge services. Given the marketing detail and consistent omission of any concierge wording, it is very unlikely a concierge is present.

Pet-related amenities like a dog park are not advertised anywhere in the remarks. Combined with the lack of MLS indication, this supports that the building does not offer a dedicated dog park or dog run.

Staffing is consistently described in terms of management and a resident manager, not a doorman. The repeated, detailed building descriptions with no doorman reference make it highly likely there is no doorman service.

At least 12 of 19 listings identify an exercise amenity, using phrases such as "workout area," "fitness area," "gym," and "mini workout area with several exercise equipment." The feature is consistently described across multiple agents and confirms the previously high-confidence assessment.

Even in high-detail descriptions of services like the resident manager and security, there is no reference to limousine or car service. The consistent silence and MLS data indicate there is no limo or house car service.

Despite thorough amenity lists, no listing advertises any meeting or conference room. With only a single MLS instance checked and no textual support, it is very unlikely the building offers a shared meeting room.

Strong evidence across multiple listings that the building offers patios/decks: at least 10 separate remark sections mention lanais/porches (phrases include "open porch", "two lanais", "three lanais", "40 foot lanai", and "oversized lanai doors"). Historical confidence was high and the repeated, detailed lanai references in current remarks (across different agent write-ups) indicate this is a real building feature, even though the MLS amenity checkbox is inconsistently set (5/15 listings).

Remarks talk about proximity to parks and the canal but do not describe any on-site jogging or walking path. With MLS also clear, the building does not appear to offer its own jogging path amenity.

Family/kid amenities are not mentioned even in long amenity lists. The consistent omission and MLS data both indicate there is no children’s playground at this property.

Across all 14 remarks there are frequent mentions of lanais and views, but no references to a private or fenced yard or enclosed ground-level outdoor area. Combined with the high-rise context and lack of MLS PRIYAR, this strongly suggests the building does not offer private yard spaces.

Listings highlight many other amenities but never mention a putting green. The absence from both remarks and MLS confirms there is no putting green at this building.

At least 14 listings explicitly reference a "recreation area," "rec area," or "recreation/lounge area." This consistent wording across many independent listings strongly confirms a shared building recreation area.

Several listings mention a "recreation area," "resident lounge," or "recreation/lounge area," and 6 of 19 listings carry the RECROO designation. The evidence supports a shared recreational room or lounge broadly, though agents usually use recreation-area terminology rather than explicitly saying enclosed recreation room.

All restaurant references are to the surrounding Waikiki area rather than in-building dining. Since this would be a strong marketing point and is never claimed, the building does not have its own restaurant.

Given that rooftop decks are typically highlighted in marketing but never appear here, and MLS data does not show a rooftop amenity, the building likely has no shared rooftop deck or rooftop facilities.

Agents repeatedly itemize amenities without ever referring to a sauna or steam facility. This, plus its absence in MLS, shows that the building does not have a sauna.

Storage is strongly and consistently documented across many listings, with at least 15 current remarks explicitly mentioning storage or storage rooms/lockers. Multiple agents describe locked building storage for bicycles and surfboards, while several listings also state that an assigned storage space or storage locker is included with the unit; the repeated evidence across listing styles supports a genuine building feature rather than a single copied checkbox.

Surfboard storage is repeatedly and explicitly identified as a building amenity. The listings describe locked or dedicated surfboard storage, sometimes alongside bicycle storage.

Across all detailed amenity descriptions, tennis courts are never mentioned even though other amenities are carefully listed. Combined with all MLS records omitting a tennis court, this strongly indicates there is no tennis court at this building.

Eighteen of 19 current listings mark the trash-chute amenity, but zero supplied remarks use terms such as "trash chute," "garbage chute," or "refuse chute." This supports the feature in current MLS data but is weaker than the other amenities because it lacks direct textual confirmation.

Listings repeatedly describe reserved or covered parking stalls and reference an adjacent parking garage but never mention valet or any staffed parking service. The consistent omission of valet combined with MLS data strongly indicates the building does not provide valet service.

A majority of MLS entries indicate some form of gate/wall/fence, and narrative remarks consistently refer to secured entry and a secured building. While not spelled out as 'gated community', the combined MLS data and security-focused descriptions support that the property has perimeter or gated physical security.

Amenity lists repeatedly highlight a heated saltwater pool only, without any separate spa or hot tub. Given that whirlpools are desirable and would be advertised, the building almost certainly lacks a whirlpool or hot tub.

Strong building-level evidence supports a shared pool at Marina Towers. Across the provided remarks, roughly a dozen-plus listings mention it directly using terms like "swimming pool," "heated salt pool," and "heated saline pool," which appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.

Approximately 15 of 19 current listing remarks explicitly describe the building pool as heated, including "heated salt pool," "heated saline pool," and "heated saltwater pool." The repeated descriptions across multiple listings and agents strongly corroborate the historically high-confidence feature rather than reflecting a single copied checkbox.

The saltwater nature of the pool is repeatedly confirmed in the listings. Several remarks describe the pool as heated and salt, saline, or saltwater.

In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the building: current MLS inclusions show washer/dryer in all 19 of 19 listings. At least four public remarks explicitly mention in-unit washer/dryer or a unit-specific washer and dryer, including newly installed appliances, confirming this is not merely unsupported checkbox data.

None of the many amenity descriptions for this building mention community or shared laundry, even when listing numerous other facilities. Together with 0/14 MLS entries for community laundry and repeated emphasis on in-unit washer/dryers, it is very likely the building does not offer separate community laundry facilities.

The remarks were searched for coin laundry, paid laundry, laundry fees, quarters, card-operated machines, and similar wording. No evidence indicates that community laundry requires payment.

The remarks were searched for laundry facilities on every floor, laundry rooms on each floor, and floor-by-floor laundry. No such statements were found.

Parking is explicitly mentioned in at least 16 listings, with numerous remarks describing covered stalls, parking spaces, or a parking garage. This is consistent with the MLS data showing parking flags in all 19 listings and represents strong building-level evidence across multiple listings.

Assigned or reserved parking is explicitly mentioned in at least 14 listings, using phrases such as "assigned parking stall," "assigned covered parking," "reserved parking stall," and "oversized reserved parking stall." The evidence is strong across multiple listings and agrees with the MLS assignment flag in 17 of 19 listings.

There is very strong evidence that the building offers covered parking. Multiple listings explicitly mention 'covered parking stall,' 'assigned covered parking stall,' 'reserved covered parking,' and 'Parking Garage,' indicating this is a real shared building feature rather than an agent checkbox artifact.

Multiple listings confirm an assigned or reserved parking stall is included with the sale. However, assigned or included parking does not establish that the stall is deeded.

Across all reviewed remarks, amenities are detailed (pool, BBQ, workout area, storage, etc.) but there is no reference to EV charging or charging stations. Combined with the complete absence of the EVCHRG checkbox in current MLS data, this strongly suggests the building does not offer dedicated EV parking or chargers.

A monthly fee applies to additional motorcycle or moped parking, and nearby garage parking may also be available. The listings do not specify the monthly dollar amount for parking.

Agents repeatedly list building amenities and nearby conveniences but never mention 'guest parking' or 'visitor parking'. Given that guest parking is usually advertised when present and the GUEST checkbox is unused in all MLS entries, it is very likely the building does not provide dedicated guest parking stalls.

Remarks describe building security (e.g., 'secured building with video monitoring', 'secured access') but do not reference a gated garage, key/card-controlled parking, or 'secured parking'. The consistent lack of the SECENT checkbox and absence of any explicit 'secured parking' language suggest the parking itself does not have a distinct secured entry feature.

Where stalls are described, they are referred to as 'standard assigned covered parking stall', 'reserved parking space', or similar, without any indication they are tandem. The complete lack of tandem terminology in remarks and MLS data supports that tandem parking is not a building feature.

Agents highlight many services and amenities (resident manager, recreation area, pool, storage, etc.) but never reference valet or attended parking. Given that valet is a prominent feature when present and is not reflected in either MLS checkboxes or remarks, it is almost certain the building does not offer valet parking.

The remarks discuss assigned parking and possible additional parking availability but do not mention a waitlist. A building-wide parking waitlist cannot be confirmed.

Agents highlight multiple security elements but never reference a keyed or restricted elevator, which is typically marketed if present. Combined with the absence of any MLS indication, this strongly suggests there is no keyed/fob elevator security system.

The remarks mention secured entry, secured access, and a secured building with video monitoring. They do not identify a card- or fob-based access system.

Multiple independent remarks detail the building’s security features but only reference a resident manager and secured access, never a security guard or staffed security service. Given the marketing emphasis on security elsewhere, the consistent omission of a guard strongly indicates there is no security-guard service.

The remarks mention a resident manager, secured entry, and video monitoring. No security patrol, roving security, patrol service, or patrolled-building language was found.

Video security is clearly confirmed by the phrase 'secured building with video monitoring.' This explicit mention in the remarks outweighs the unchecked MLS amenity box and supports that the building has camera/monitoring systems.

No listing remarks mention central air, HVAC, or a building-wide system, and 0/14 MLS entries check the central AC field. Instead, remarks consistently frame AC as an optional, unit-specific feature, indicating the building relies on individual units rather than central air.

No listings' public remarks (0/15) specifically mention 'split', 'mini-split', or 'ductless' AC. One listing has ACSPL checked in inclusions, but multiple listings only reference generic 'AC' or that 'ACs are new,' which does not confirm split/ductless systems. Given prior absence across listings and lack of explicit remarks, there is strong evidence the building does not offer split/ductless AC.

Window or wall air conditioning is strongly supported across the building: 14 of 19 current listings include ACWIUN, and multiple remarks explicitly reference “window air conditioner,” “two ac's,” or newly updated AC units. Although some listings omit AC or note that it can be installed, the historical high-confidence evidence and repeated remarks from multiple listings confirm that units with window AC are offered.

Concrete construction is strongly supported across the current records, with 15 of 19 listings marking CONCRE. One independent public remark explicitly states "Concrete high rise building built in 1967," providing direct confirmation beyond copied MLS fields.

A notable portion of listings (6/14) identify double‑wall construction and none explicitly contradict it. This suggests that at least some portions (often interior walls) of the building use double‑wall assemblies.

Hollow tile is not supported by the public remarks. Although 6/18 current MLS records have HOLTIL, no listing copy mentions 'hollow tile' or anything similar, and the remarks that do discuss construction point to concrete instead. This looks like checkbox drift or copy-paste error rather than a verified building feature.

Masonry/stucco construction appears in 11 of 19 current MLS records, but 0 public remarks mention "masonry," "stucco," or related construction language. The feature is retained because of the prior high-confidence history and majority MLS support, though the remarks do not independently corroborate it.

No listings mark steel‑frame construction and many mark concrete instead, suggesting concrete is the primary structure. Given local building norms and the absence of any steel references, steel‑frame construction can be ruled out with high confidence.

Concrete slab construction is marked in 7 of 19 current listings, while 0 public remarks mention a concrete slab or solid concrete foundation. The feature is retained due to the prior high-confidence assessment, but current textual evidence is absent and MLS support is less consistent than for concrete construction.

No analysis available

None of the 14 MLS listings identify wood‑frame construction, and most explicitly indicate concrete. For a mid‑century high‑rise building of this scale in Waikiki, wood‑frame construction would be highly unlikely.

The above‑ground construction checkbox is never used, whereas data points instead to a slab foundation. Given the building type and MLS patterns, it is very unlikely to be classified as an above‑ground construction building.

There are zero references to brick construction in the MLS data, and this building type/location almost always uses concrete systems. The consistent absence across agents strongly indicates it is not a brick building.

The MLS data never indicates single‑wall construction, and the building’s size and type are inconsistent with that method. It is therefore very unlikely that this building uses single‑wall construction.

The listings do not state that short-term rentals are permitted. No explicit prohibition is provided either, so STR allowance cannot be confirmed from the remarks.

The remarks mention a residential building pool and recreational amenities, not a hotel rental program. Because STR allowance is not confirmed, participation in a hotel pool is false under the prerequisite rule.

The listings contain no statement requiring owners to participate in a hotel rental pool. STR and hotel-pool participation are not established, so mandatory participation is false.

Across all provided listings, agents never describe the property as leasehold or mention lease rent or expiry, which is standard practice when marketing leasehold units in Hawaii. The consistent omission of leasehold language, combined with references only to maintenance fees, indicates that the building has fee simple units.

Despite numerous listings and very detailed remarks, there are zero references to leasehold terms, lease rent, or lease expiration—information that is normally emphasized when present. This consistent absence across many agents and listings indicates that Marina Towers almost certainly does not have leasehold units.

The building is identified as fee simple rather than leasehold, so a lease-expiry year is not applicable. No ground lease, renewal, or expiration year appears in the remarks.

The remarks were searched for VA approval and financing language, but none was found. VA eligibility cannot be confirmed from these listings.

Several remarks directly confirm comprehensive building insurance, including "Building is 100% Insured" and "Building is Fully Insured." Repeated explicit statements across listings provide strong evidence that the HOA fully insures the building.

Listings repeatedly list amenities like a heated salt pool, BBQ, recreation area, workout area, storage, and security, but never mention fire sprinklers. Combined with the unchecked sprinklers field in all available MLS records, this strongly indicates the building does not have a fire sprinkler system.

The remarks were searched for fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, and passed fire inspection language. No such statements were found, so there is no public-remarks evidence that the building has passed an FLSE.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are strongly supported across 11 of 19 current listings. Key phrases include "Ocean views," "gorgeous water views," "peek-a-boo ocean and canal views," "OCEAN, SUNSET & CANAL VIEWS," and "Pacific Ocean beyond," indicating the building offers units with ocean views rather than a single isolated claim.

Mountain views are cited in at least 7 of 15 listings, including phrases such as 'Panoramic Mountain, Valley, and Water Views' and 'Mountain, Valley and Canal Views'. Multiple agent remarks consistently list mountain outlooks, supporting that the building offers mountain-view units.

Across all provided listings, agents describe a wide range of views but never reference Diamond Head or its crater. Combined with 0/14 MLS entries including Diamond Head, this strongly indicates that Diamond Head views are not a notable feature of this building.

City views are well supported across the building. Current remarks include explicit phrases like 'city skyline' and 'OCEAN & CITY,' matching the strong MLS pattern where 16/18 listings show CITY in the view field. This looks consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off agent copy.

Coastline/ocean-facing views appear in a smaller subset of units but are clearly present. Remarks describe 'Pacific Ocean beyond,' 'ocean views,' and other beach-facing outlooks, which is consistent with the MLS history showing 3/18 listings with COASTL. The evidence suggests this is an available view type for some units, not a universal one.

Listing remarks focus on ocean, canal, marina, mountain, city, and sunset views, with no agent marketing garden or courtyard vistas as a feature. Combined with 0/14 MLS entries for garden views, this suggests garden views are not a significant or distinct building view feature.

Across 14 listings, agents never mention golf course or fairway views, even though they consistently detail other views like ocean, canal, mountains, city, and sunset. Together with 0/14 MLS entries for golf course view, this strongly indicates the building does not offer golf course views.

Marina-related views are very strongly supported, appearing in 15 of 19 current listings. Remarks cite "canal and mountain views," "city, canal, ocean, harbor, and sunset views," "ocean, canal, marina," "spectacular view of the ocean, canal, marina," and "Ala Wai, Marina," with confirmation across many listings.

Agents consistently highlight 'sunset' views and western exposures but never reference sunrise or morning sun in any listing. With no MLS entries marking sunrise views, it is unlikely that sunrise views are a notable selling point for this building.

Sunset views are supported in 8 of 19 listings. Explicit phrases include "sunset views," "breathtaking views of the sunset, ocean and canal," "OCEAN, SUNSET & CANAL VIEWS," and "spectacular sunset views of the Ala Wai, Marina and Pacific Ocean beyond," providing strong repeated evidence.

Agents describe many view types—ocean, canal, marina, city, mountains, and sunset—but never refer to any cemetery outlook. This, plus the absence of cemetery in all MLS view fields, strongly indicates the building does not have notable cemetery views.

The remarks mention ocean, canal, marina, sunset, mountain, and water views. They do not state that Friday night fireworks can be viewed from a unit or the building.

No analysis available

No analysis available

There are no explicit references to pets, dogs, or cats in the remarks, but there are also no statements of 'no pets' and the MLS shows 0/14 units marked with NOPET. Given the policy that only explicit 'no pets' makes this feature false, the building is treated as allowing pets with moderate confidence.

Resident manager is strongly confirmed across the building: 19 of 19 current listings include RESMAN, with approximately 15 remarks explicitly mentioning a "resident manager," "full-time resident manager," "on-site Resident Manager," or "devoted resident manager." The repeated descriptions across multiple listing styles and agents, including references to a full-time and attentive manager, support a genuine building-wide amenity rather than an isolated copy-paste error.

Remarks focus on long-term residential living, views, amenities, and location, with no mention of hotel-style services or a rental pool. The complete absence of condotel-related language across many agents and 0/14 MLS CONDOT flags strongly supports that this is not a condotel building.

All listings speak of the property as a conventional condo unit and never mention cooperative ownership structures or share-based ownership. The absence of any co-op terminology and 0/14 COOTAX flags indicate the building is a condominium, not a cooperative.