Makikilani Plaza
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Makikilani Plaza
Building Overview
Makikilani Plaza in Makiki-Tantalus (built 1974) — condo building with no pets and no short-term rentals, per MLS data.
About Makikilani Plaza
Makikilani Plaza is a condominium building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was built in 1974. MLS data provided for this property does not specify unit count, building size, or construction type.
Key policy details from the MLS indicate that pets are not allowed in the building and short-term rentals are not permitted. The listing does not include information on specific resident amenities such as a pool, fitness center, or common areas, nor does it list individual unit features.
Additional items commonly of interest to buyers — including parking availability, monthly maintenance or association fees, management company contact information, and any special assessments — are not identified in the MLS data provided (management company listed as unknown). This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details with the listing agent or association prior to making a purchase decision.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for numeric percentages and phrases such as 'majority owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied.' The remarks contain no owner-occupancy information, so the percentage remains unknown.
I searched for explicit counts such as '4 elevators,' 'four elevators,' or 'multiple elevators.' The remarks only say 'elevator,' so the current value of 1 is retained with low confidence; there is no evidence in the remarks to confirm or deny the exact count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included in the HOA/maintenance fees. Current MLS data shows SEWER checked in 8 of 9 listings, and none of the public remarks contradict this or suggest a recent change. This looks like a consistent building-level MLS feature rather than a one-off agent entry.
Water appears to be included in the HOA/maintenance fees. Current MLS data shows WATER checked in 8 of 9 listings, while the public remarks are silent on the topic and do not indicate any change. The repeated MLS pattern across listings suggests a building-wide amenity/fee inclusion.
BBQ is strongly supported by the public remarks: several listings mention a 'Recreation Area with BBQ grills' or a 'barbeque/recreation area.' This appears across multiple agents/listings, so it is likely a genuine shared amenity in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, car wash facilities are not mentioned in any remarks. The lone CRWSH checkbox in the current MLS data is not supported by the text and may be copy-paste or unverified input. Based on the available evidence, the building should not be treated as having a confirmed car wash amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Trash chute appears in the current MLS amenities for 7 of 8 listings, suggesting a building-level feature even though the public remarks are silent about it. Because copy/paste errors are possible and no listing text confirms it directly, confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly confirmed for this building. At least 7 of the provided public remarks explicitly reference it with phrases like "swimming pool," "sparkling pool," "large pool," and "Relax at the Pool and Recreation Deck." The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and appears to be a genuine shared building amenity, not a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listings. At least 5 remarks explicitly mention it, including "washer/dryer," "IN-UNIT WASHER/DRYER," and "Washer/Dryer in Unit!" The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, so this feature should be included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly available for the building. Across the provided listings, 9 of 9 MLS records include parking features, and the remarks repeatedly reference 'one parking stall,' 'covered parking,' 'guest parking,' and the parking entrance on Spencer Street. This is strong, consistent evidence across multiple agents rather than a single copied remark.
Assigned/reserved parking is supported by multiple explicit remarks, including 'Assigned covered PARKING,' '1 Secured Parking!,' and unit-specific stall descriptions. Current MLS data also shows 6/9 listings marked with ASSIGN, which aligns with the remarks and indicates this is not just agent copy-paste. The evidence is strong enough to confirm assigned parking for the building.
Covered parking is very well supported. At least 4 listings explicitly reference covered/secured parking stalls, and the MLS history already showed a high rate of covered-parking checkboxes, so this looks like a consistent building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
The listings consistently describe an assigned or covered parking stall, including a stall on the same level as the unit. No remarks say the stall is deeded, included in the deed, or separately owned, so deeded status is not supported.
No analysis available
The remarks mention assigned, covered, secured, guest, and building parking, but do not state a monthly parking fee or additional parking charge. There is no public-remark evidence of a parking fee.
Guest parking is clearly available at the building. Several listings explicitly say 'guest parking' or 'ample guest parking,' and this aligns with the current MLS pattern, so there is strong support that the building offers visitor parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for parking waitlist, waiting list, or instructions to join a list. None were found; the listings instead describe available or assigned parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is supported by multiple public remarks, including explicit mentions of "Window a/c" and "Brand new GE Window AC." Combined with the historical MLS pattern (7 of 9 listings showing ACWIUN), this strongly indicates the building offers window AC in at least some units. The evidence is repeated across listings and does not appear to be a one-off copy-paste error.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS record: 9 of 9 listings include CONCRE in construction_materials. None of the public remarks contradict this, and the consistency across all listings suggests this is a stable building characteristic rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks contain no statements allowing short-term rentals, vacation rentals, STR, NUC, TVU, or similar use. They mention rental potential and a current tenant, but that does not establish short-term rental permission.
The remarks describe a residential pool and recreation/BBQ areas, not a hotel rental pool. Because short-term rental permission is not supported, participation in a hotel rental pool must also be false.
The remarks contain no indication that owners must participate in a hotel rental program. Since STR is not established and no hotel pool is described, mandatory hotel pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly identify the property as leasehold and state that the land lease expires in 2029. The consistent expiry year is 2029.
The remarks were searched for VA approved, VA financing, and VA loans accepted language. None of these terms or equivalent statements were found, so there is no public-remark evidence that the building is VA approved.
I searched for statements that the HOA provides full, fully covered, comprehensive, or walls-in insurance. No insurance coverage information appears in the remarks, so this is set to false with medium-low confidence based on absence of evidence.
No analysis available
I searched for language indicating that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or is fire-safety certified. Nothing relevant was found in the public remarks, so this is set to false with medium-low confidence based on absence of evidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported across the building. At least 7 of the provided remarks explicitly mention ocean views or a peekaboo/partial/small ocean view, and the historical MLS data is already very strong at 8/9 listings. The consistent wording across multiple listings suggests this is a real building feature, not just copy-paste noise.
Mountain views appear to be available in at least some units, but evidence is limited. Only one remark explicitly names mountains, while MLS data shows mountain views in 2 of 8 listings, suggesting this is a real but less common building feature.
Limited MLS-level evidence (2 of 7 listings flag Diamond Head) but no supporting language in agent remarks. This suggests some units may offer Diamond Head views, but evidence is weak and appears to be MLS checkbox-driven rather than confirmed in remarks.
City views are clearly a building-wide feature available in many units. Every MLS entry lists CITY, and the public remarks repeatedly confirm it across multiple listings, indicating strong agreement rather than isolated marketing language. The evidence is overwhelming and stable.
No MLS or remark evidence for coastline/shoreline views (0 of 7 MLS entries and no mentions in agent remarks). High confidence that the building does not advertise a coastline view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Minimal MLS evidence (2 of 7 listings flagged sunrise) with no corroborating remarks. This implies some units may have sunrise/eastern exposure, but the evidence is weak and primarily derives from MLS flags rather than agent descriptions.
Sunset views are supported, though less consistently than ocean or city views. The remarks explicitly mention “Enjoy sunsets,” and MLS data shows sunset in 4 of 8 listings, suggesting a real but not universal feature across the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is consistently supported across the current MLS dataset, with 9/9 listings showing RESMAN in amenities. Several remarks explicitly say “resident manager,” “Resident Manager and Guest Parking,” and “resident manager on property,” which confirms this is a building-level amenity rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.