Makikilani Plaza
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Makikilani Plaza
Building Overview
Makikilani Plaza in Makiki-Tantalus (built 1974) — condo building with no pets and no short-term rentals, per MLS data.
About Makikilani Plaza
Makikilani Plaza is a condominium building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was built in 1974. MLS data provided for this property does not specify unit count, building size, or construction type.
Key policy details from the MLS indicate that pets are not allowed in the building and short-term rentals are not permitted. The listing does not include information on specific resident amenities such as a pool, fitness center, or common areas, nor does it list individual unit features.
Additional items commonly of interest to buyers — including parking availability, monthly maintenance or association fees, management company contact information, and any special assessments — are not identified in the MLS data provided (management company listed as unknown). This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details with the listing agent or association prior to making a purchase decision.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy language such as a percentage, "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied." The remarks do not include any such information. Since this is rarely listed and no explicit evidence appears, the value remains unknown.
I looked for explicit elevator counts such as "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," or a written number. The remarks only say "elevator," which supports a single elevator. No conflicting evidence was found.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included in the HOA/maintenance fees. Current MLS data shows SEWER checked in 8 of 9 listings, and none of the public remarks contradict this or suggest a recent change. This looks like a consistent building-level MLS feature rather than a one-off agent entry.
Water appears to be included in the HOA/maintenance fees. Current MLS data shows WATER checked in 8 of 9 listings, while the public remarks are silent on the topic and do not indicate any change. The repeated MLS pattern across listings suggests a building-wide amenity/fee inclusion.
BBQ is strongly supported by the public remarks: several listings mention a 'Recreation Area with BBQ grills' or a 'barbeque/recreation area.' This appears across multiple agents/listings, so it is likely a genuine shared amenity in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, car wash facilities are not mentioned in any remarks. The lone CRWSH checkbox in the current MLS data is not supported by the text and may be copy-paste or unverified input. Based on the available evidence, the building should not be treated as having a confirmed car wash amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Trash chute appears in the current MLS amenities for 7 of 8 listings, suggesting a building-level feature even though the public remarks are silent about it. Because copy/paste errors are possible and no listing text confirms it directly, confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly confirmed for this building. At least 7 of the provided public remarks explicitly reference it with phrases like "swimming pool," "sparkling pool," "large pool," and "Relax at the Pool and Recreation Deck." The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and appears to be a genuine shared building amenity, not a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listings. At least 5 remarks explicitly mention it, including "washer/dryer," "IN-UNIT WASHER/DRYER," and "Washer/Dryer in Unit!" The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, so this feature should be included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly available for the building. Across the provided listings, 9 of 9 MLS records include parking features, and the remarks repeatedly reference 'one parking stall,' 'covered parking,' 'guest parking,' and the parking entrance on Spencer Street. This is strong, consistent evidence across multiple agents rather than a single copied remark.
Assigned/reserved parking is supported by multiple explicit remarks, including 'Assigned covered PARKING,' '1 Secured Parking!,' and unit-specific stall descriptions. Current MLS data also shows 6/9 listings marked with ASSIGN, which aligns with the remarks and indicates this is not just agent copy-paste. The evidence is strong enough to confirm assigned parking for the building.
Covered parking is very well supported. At least 4 listings explicitly reference covered/secured parking stalls, and the MLS history already showed a high rate of covered-parking checkboxes, so this looks like a consistent building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
I looked for explicit deeded/owned parking language such as deeded stall, parking included in the deed, or owned parking, and found none. The listings indicate assigned or secured parking, which is not the same as deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched for any stated monthly parking cost, rental fee, or additional parking charge, but found none. The remarks mention parking availability and assignment, but not any separate fee.
Guest parking is clearly available at the building. Several listings explicitly say 'guest parking' or 'ample guest parking,' and this aligns with the current MLS pattern, so there is strong support that the building offers visitor parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, waiting list, or instructions to join a parking waitlist, and found nothing. The remarks instead describe parking as available/assigned.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is supported by multiple public remarks, including explicit mentions of "Window a/c" and "Brand new GE Window AC." Combined with the historical MLS pattern (7 of 9 listings showing ACWIUN), this strongly indicates the building offers window AC in at least some units. The evidence is repeated across listings and does not appear to be a one-off copy-paste error.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS record: 9 of 9 listings include CONCRE in construction_materials. None of the public remarks contradict this, and the consistency across all listings suggests this is a stable building characteristic rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR permitted, vacation rental allowed, NUC, or TVU and found none. There is also no language suggesting short-term rental use is allowed in the building, so this is not supported by the remarks.
I looked for hotel rental pool references like hotel-managed operations or branded pool programs and found none. Since the remarks do not indicate STR allowance either, hotel pool participation is not supported.
I searched for phrases such as mandatory hotel pool, required participation, cannot opt out, or must rent through a program, and found none. The remarks do not show any rental pool system at all, so mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The lease expiration is explicitly stated in multiple remarks. The consistent and most specific year mentioned is 2029, so that is the lease expiry year.
I searched the public remarks for any language indicating the building is VA loan approved, including phrases like VA approved or VA financing, and found none. With no explicit evidence in the listings, this is treated as not supported by the remarks.
I looked for any statement that the HOA provides full or walls-in insurance coverage. The remarks do not mention insurance coverage at all. Because there is no explicit evidence, this is treated as false at low confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for fire/life safety compliance language, including FLSE, passed fire inspection, and fire safety certified. Nothing relevant was mentioned. With no explicit evidence in the public remarks, this remains unconfirmed and is treated as false at low confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported across the building. At least 7 of the provided remarks explicitly mention ocean views or a peekaboo/partial/small ocean view, and the historical MLS data is already very strong at 8/9 listings. The consistent wording across multiple listings suggests this is a real building feature, not just copy-paste noise.
Mountain views appear to be available in at least some units, but evidence is limited. Only one remark explicitly names mountains, while MLS data shows mountain views in 2 of 8 listings, suggesting this is a real but less common building feature.
Limited MLS-level evidence (2 of 7 listings flag Diamond Head) but no supporting language in agent remarks. This suggests some units may offer Diamond Head views, but evidence is weak and appears to be MLS checkbox-driven rather than confirmed in remarks.
City views are clearly a building-wide feature available in many units. Every MLS entry lists CITY, and the public remarks repeatedly confirm it across multiple listings, indicating strong agreement rather than isolated marketing language. The evidence is overwhelming and stable.
No MLS or remark evidence for coastline/shoreline views (0 of 7 MLS entries and no mentions in agent remarks). High confidence that the building does not advertise a coastline view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Minimal MLS evidence (2 of 7 listings flagged sunrise) with no corroborating remarks. This implies some units may have sunrise/eastern exposure, but the evidence is weak and primarily derives from MLS flags rather than agent descriptions.
Sunset views are supported, though less consistently than ocean or city views. The remarks explicitly mention “Enjoy sunsets,” and MLS data shows sunset in 4 of 8 listings, suggesting a real but not universal feature across the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is consistently supported across the current MLS dataset, with 9/9 listings showing RESMAN in amenities. Several remarks explicitly say “resident manager,” “Resident Manager and Guest Parking,” and “resident manager on property,” which confirms this is a building-level amenity rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.