Makiki Winds Apartments
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Makiki Winds Apartments
Building Overview
Makiki Winds Apartments in Makiki-Tantalus — concrete building (1967) with window AC and covered, assigned parking.
About Makiki Winds Apartments
Makiki Winds Apartments is a concrete residential building located in the Makiki‑Tantalus neighborhood, constructed in 1967. The building includes one elevator and is of mid‑century concrete construction.
Key features reported in MLS records include window air conditioning for units and a single elevator serving the building. No additional amenity details are provided in the available data.
According to available records, parking is available, covered, and assigned. Pets and short‑term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. This information is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details independently prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit occupancy figures like "80% owner occupied" as well as broader phrases such as majority owner occupied or highly owner occupied. The remarks only mention that the unit may appeal to "owner-occupants," which describes a buyer type, not the building's occupancy rate, so the percentage remains unknown.
I found multiple references confirming the building has an elevator, including secured/gated elevator access. However, I did not find any remark explicitly stating there are more than one or giving a numeric count, so the current value of 1 is retained. No evidence in the remarks suggests changing it.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly state that 'LOW monthly maintenance fees covers: cable TV, internet, water, sewer, and common area expenses.' This matches current MLS data where CABTV is selected in most listings. Evidence is strong and consistent across different agents and time periods.
Remarks repeatedly mention that the fees include 'common area expenses,' indicating building common utilities are covered. Combined with OTCOEX being checked in every MLS record, this provides very strong, building-wide evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Neither historical nor current remarks say hot water is included, and all units list individual water heaters (WTRHTR) while HOTWAT is consistently unchecked. This strongly indicates that hot water is not a building-provided utility in the maintenance fees.
Several agents’ remarks say fees cover 'cable TV, internet, water, sewer, and common area expenses.' With INTSER selected in a majority of MLS records, the evidence strongly supports that building internet service is included in the maintenance fees.
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly say that sewer is covered in the monthly fees, typically phrased as 'water, sewer and common area expenses.' With SEWER selected in every MLS record, the evidence is consistent and building-wide.
Water is repeatedly mentioned in remarks as part of what the low maintenance fees cover, alongside sewer and common area expenses. Together with WATER being checked in all MLS records, this provides very strong evidence that water is included building-wide.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (5 of 8) explicitly mention storage: phrases include 'built-in storage for added convenience', 'balcony with a storage closet', and 'storage unit on the first level'. Although the MLS amenities checkbox is unchecked across listings, consistent remarks across different listings/agents confirm the building offers storage units/lockers. Evidence is strong and corroborates the prior high-confidence assessment.
No remarks indicate dedicated surfboard storage or combined bike/surfboard storage areas. Phrases like 'built-in storage', 'storage closet', and 'storage unit' appear to describe in-unit or lanai storage only, so there is no evidence of a specific surfboard storage facility in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks describe features such as elevator access, security gate, lanais, parking, and community laundry, but do not mention any type of pool. I specifically looked for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', or 'saline pool' and found none. In the absence of any reference to a salt water pool, this feature is set to false.
At least one listing (the split-level 3BR unit) explicitly mentions a 'newer washer and dryer' in the unit, confirming in‑unit laundry exists in some apartments. Additionally, 2 of 6 current MLS listings check washer/dryer in the inclusions. Buyers seeking buildings that allow or offer in‑unit laundry would find this relevant even if not all units have it.
Multiple listings (at least 4 of the recent 8 public remarks) explicitly state the building has shared/community laundry—phrases include 'community laundry area on the 1st floor', 'building also offers a laundry area', and 'Community laundry on first floor'. The MLS COMLAU amenity is checked across all current listings, and the evidence is consistent across different remarks/agents, supporting high confidence that the building offers shared laundry facilities.
The remarks do not specify whether the community laundry requires payment (e.g., coin-op or card-op). Since there are no explicit indications of paid laundry, this field is set to false by default, but with only medium-to-low confidence due to the lack of direct evidence.
Listings repeatedly describe community laundry as being on the first floor only. There are no mentions of laundry on each or every floor, which strongly suggests that the building does not provide laundry facilities on every floor. Therefore this feature is marked false.
Multiple listings state the unit "comes with a well-positioned covered parking spot," "includes a spacious + partially covered parking stall," and "one covered parking stall," indicating on-site parking is provided. MLS parking_features support this, with 7/7 entries indicating some form of parking and none indicating no parking. Evidence is consistent across different listings and agents, not just a single copy-paste remark.
High confidence that the building offers assigned parking: 8 listings reference assigned or dedicated stalls, with key phrases like "COMES WITH ASSIGNED COVERED PARKING" and "assigned parking." Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, indicating assigned parking is a building feature.
Strong evidence the building has covered parking: 6–8 listings mention covered or partially covered stalls with quotes such as "assigned covered parking" and "partially covered parking stall." Mentions come from multiple listings/agents and align with prior MLS data.
The listings consistently mention assigned/covered stalls rather than deeded ownership. Because deeded parking is not explicitly stated, I treat this as not deeded based on the remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language, monthly parking charges, or rental amounts and found none. The remarks only describe the stall type, not any separate parking cost.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist language and found none. The remarks instead describe included/assigned stalls, so there is no evidence of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms like key card, keycard, fob, card reader, or electronic access. While the building clearly has secured/gated entry, there is no explicit evidence that this is a card or fob-based system, so card access is assumed not present based on available information.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases such as security patrol, roving security, or patrolled building and found none. In the absence of any reference to patrol services, the building is assumed not to have a security patrol based on current remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of five current MLS listings for Makiki Wind(s) Apartments include ACWIUN (window AC) in the inclusions, indicating that at least some units have window air conditioning. None of the public remarks for any listing mention air conditioning specifically, but they also do not state that there is no AC, and the pattern in the MLS checkboxes across multiple listings is consistent with window units being present in at least some apartments. Given that any unit having window AC should trigger this feature at the building level, the evidence supports marking window_ac as present.
All available MLS records consistently mark the building as concrete construction (historical 13/13 listings; current 8/8 listings show CONCRE in construction_materials). Public remarks do not explicitly mention construction material, but the unanimous and long-standing checkbox selection across multiple listings/agents provides strong evidence the building is concrete.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR-related terms such as short-term rental allowed, legal vacation rental, NUC, and TVU, but found no references. With no public remark evidence indicating STRs are allowed, this is best treated as not allowed from the available remarks.
I found no evidence of any hotel rental pool, hotel-managed program, or branded rental pool participation. Since STR allowance is not evidenced, hotel-pool participation must also be false.
I searched for mandatory pool language such as required participation, cannot opt out, or must be in a rental program and found nothing. With no indication of STR allowance or a hotel pool, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold wording such as "lease expires," "ground lease ends," "leasehold," and four-digit expiry years, but found nothing. There is no public remark evidence to identify a lease expiry year.
I searched the remarks for VA loan approval or VA financing language and found none. Based on the public remarks alone, there is no evidence this building is VA-approved.
I looked for insurance-related phrases indicating HOA-provided full or walls-in coverage. The remarks only discuss maintenance fees and included services, not building insurance coverage, so there is no basis to mark this as fully insured.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for fire/life safety evaluation language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection. None were found, so there is no evidence to mark this building as having passed a fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Building-level city views are offered by some units: 2 of 8 recent MLS listings have CITY selected in view_descriptions and none list NONE. Public remarks include the phrase "CITY VIEWS" (e.g., "CITY VIEWS. COMES WITH ASSIGNED COVERED PARKING."), indicating at least some units provide city/downtown views. Evidence comes from multiple listings/agents and aligns with historical checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across 7 current listings and 5 previously analyzed listings for this building, none of the public remarks mention sunset views, western exposure, or evening sun, even when describing lanais and views. The MLS view descriptions also do not contain ‘SUNSET’, suggesting agents do not market this building as offering notable sunset views. Given the consistent lack of this feature in marketing across many listings, it is very likely that sunset views are not a defining attribute of this building.
No analysis available
Descriptions emphasize convenient Makiki location, lanais with storage, and building amenities, with no suggestion of visible fireworks displays. Without explicit mention of fireworks views from the property, this feature is marked as not present from the available information.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.