Makakilo Hale 1
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Makakilo Hale 1
Building Overview
Makakilo Hale 1 in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale: concrete construction (1974); pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Makakilo Hale 1
Based on MLS data, Makakilo Hale 1 is located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood and was built in 1974. The building is constructed of concrete. No unit size, bedroom count, or total number of units are specified in the provided MLS data.
According to available records, on-site policies include a prohibition on pets and a prohibition on short-term rentals. No specific building amenities (such as pool, elevator, or laundry facilities) are listed in the data provided.
Additional details such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, and the management company are not specified (management company listed as Unknown). Buyers should verify all building facts, rules, and fee information with their agent or the managing entity, as this summary is based solely on available MLS data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports this feature. Current MLS data shows 18/20 listings include OTCOEX, and remarks repeatedly reference association/common-area upkeep rather than individual-unit service. The pattern looks consistent across multiple agents and is not just isolated copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly indicates hot water is not included in maintenance fees. The MLS pattern is 0/20 HOTWAT and 18/20 WTRHTR, and remarks reference unit-level water heaters such as “new water heater” and included appliances, which is inconsistent with building-supplied hot water. This is strong cross-listing evidence rather than a one-off agent note.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Very strong evidence supports sewer being included. Current MLS data shows 19/20 listings with SEWER, and at least one remark explicitly states “Maintenance Fee includes: water/sewage.” The consistency across listings and remarks makes this a high-confidence building feature.
Water inclusion is strongly supported. Current MLS data shows 19/20 listings with WATER checked, and remarks explicitly mention “water/sewage” in the maintenance fee inclusions. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, suggesting this is a stable building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks in the provided listings describe a car wash facility, and there are no mentions of a car wash, auto wash, or vehicle wash station across the remarks set. Only 7 of 20 listings had the CRWSH amenity checked, which is not strong enough to support the feature and is consistent with an MLS data error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence across many listings that this building offers patio/deck-type outdoor spaces. Roughly a dozen remarks mention a "private deck," "lanai," "patio lanai roof," or "covered lanai," suggesting this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox issue.
Zero listings' remarks explicitly mention a jogging or walking path despite some MLS checkboxes (6/20) being set. Multiple remarks refer to nearby parks and greenspaces, but there are no phrases like 'jogging path', 'walking path', or 'running trail' in any public remarks, so it's likely the WAJOPA checkbox was applied incorrectly.
No analysis available
Very strong evidence that units in this building have private yard or courtyard space. Multiple listings across different agents describe fenced courtyards, enclosed front yards, backyards, and privacy-fenced outdoor areas, which aligns with the high historical MLS signal.
No analysis available
Multiple listings (many units) reference community/association pool, lush greenspaces, grassy common areas, and amenity-like outdoor decks/areas—and 6 of 20 MLS records have RECARE checked. While agents rarely use the exact phrase 'recreation area' or 'rec area', the consistent mentions of shared pool and greenspace across listings imply a building-level recreation/amenity area; evidence is implied rather than explicitly worded.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is consistently referenced across many recent listings, appearing both at the building level and within individual unit descriptions. Multiple agents mention it in varied ways such as "additional storage," "extra storage," "ample storage throughout," and "storage shed," which strongly supports that storage units/lockers or equivalent storage space are available in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that Makakilo Hale 1 has a shared swimming pool. Across the provided remarks, roughly 15+ listings mention it directly, using phrases such as "community pool," "association pool," "private pool," and "swimming pool." The evidence appears repeatedly across multiple agents rather than a single copied description.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that this building offers in-unit laundry. Multiple current listings explicitly mention it, including "Stackable washer/dryer," "in-unit laundry system," and "in-unit washer and dryer," across different remarks and agents. The MLS inclusion data also shows 20/20 listings with washer/dryer, so this appears to be a reliable building-level feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across listings that the building has parking: 20/20 MLS records include parking features and numerous remarks state 'two parking stalls' or '2 assigned parking spaces' (e.g., 'Two parking stalls offer added convenience', 'two assigned parking spaces included'). Evidence is consistent across many agents and listings, supporting high confidence.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the listing history. In the current remarks, many listings explicitly mention '2 assigned parking spaces/stalls' or 'two assigned parking stalls,' indicating this is a consistent building feature rather than a one-off agent checkbox. The evidence appears strong across multiple agents and repeated over time.
Limited evidence that some covered parking exists: 1 of 20 MLS records include covered/garage codes, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention 'garage', 'covered parking', or 'carport'. Because at least one MLS entry indicates covered stalls, the building is marked as offering covered parking with moderate (implied) confidence.
I looked for explicit deeded-parking wording such as 'deeded parking,' 'owned stall,' or 'parking included in deed.' The public remarks consistently describe assigned parking spaces/stalls instead, which suggests parking is assigned rather than deeded. Because there is no direct deeded-parking mention, this is set to false.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language such as monthly parking charges, separate stall rental costs, or any added parking expense, but found none. The listings mention assigned parking and low maintenance fees, yet do not specify any separate parking fee, so this remains unknown.
Moderate evidence for guest parking: 13 of 20 MLS records include GUEST parking_features, though public remarks across listings do not explicitly say 'guest parking' or 'visitor parking'. The majority of MLS entries indicate guest parking is offered, so the building is included as having guest parking with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like 'parking waitlist,' 'waiting list,' or 'join the waitlist for parking' across the remarks and found no evidence. The listings instead emphasize that units come with assigned parking stalls, so there is no indication of a waitlist system from the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
8 of 19 current MLS listings check the window AC inclusion (ACWIUN), and at least two listings explicitly state "window ac's for bedrooms" and "window a/c units." Other listings reference split/cassette AC in different units, indicating a mix of systems across the building rather than copy-paste error. Evidence from multiple agents and explicit remarks supports including window_ac as a building feature.
Concrete construction is only weakly supported here: 7 of 20 current listings have CONCRE checked, but none of the remarks mention concrete, reinforced concrete, or similar phrasing. This looks more like inconsistent MLS checkbox usage than strong descriptive evidence.
Double-wall construction has the strongest support, with 16 of 20 current MLS listings marked DOUWAL. The remarks do not explicitly repeat the construction type, but the high share of checked listings makes this a reliable building feature to include.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 4 of 20 current MLS listings indicate 'SLAB' (concrete slab foundation). Across all public remarks there are no references like 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation.' The MLS checkbox occurrences are sparse and uncorroborated by agent remarks, so slab foundation is not supported by the available public descriptions.
No analysis available
Wood frame construction is supported by 13 of 20 current MLS listings. The public remarks are silent on construction type, so this appears to be driven mainly by the MLS data rather than copy in the remarks, but the volume is still strong enough to include.
Above-ground construction is only moderately supported, with 8 of 20 current listings checked ABOGRO. No public remarks explicitly mention above-ground materials or construction, so this seems to be based mostly on MLS checkbox data rather than remark confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR indicators like short-term rental allowed, legal vacation rental, NUC, or TVU, but found none. With no evidence of permission in the public remarks, STR is treated as not allowed.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as managed-by-hotel, hotel program, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or similar wording. None were found, and since STR is not supported by the remarks, hotel pool participation is false.
I searched for wording indicating a required or mandatory rental pool, including cannot opt out or must participate. No such language appears in the remarks, so mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for leasehold language such as 'lease expires,' 'ground lease,' 'renewed through,' or a specific expiration year, but found nothing. The listings focus on unit features, parking, and amenities, so the land tenure lease expiry cannot be confirmed from these remarks.
The listings directly confirm VA financing support for this building. Multiple remarks reference VA loan assumption and one explicitly states the building is VA approved.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported across many listings and agents. At least 7+ remarks explicitly mention ocean views, including phrases like 'unobstructed panoramic ocean views,' 'stunning ocean views,' and 'views of Kapolei and the ocean.' This looks like a genuine building-level feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Mountain views are confirmed by multiple listings, though less frequently than ocean views. Remarks include 'panoramic ocean and mountain views' and 'enjoying the natural light and views of the mountains,' which supports that some units in the building offer this feature. Evidence is consistent but not as widespread as ocean or sunset views.
2 of 20 current listings include DIAHEA in the MLS view field and at least one public remark explicitly states 'iconic Diamond Head.' Most remarks mention ocean, sunset, or Kapolei views but do not reference Diamond Head, suggesting the feature applies to some units (or was selectively checked) rather than the whole building. Evidence is moderate across multiple sources but not widespread, so inclusion is recommended for buyers searching for Diamond Head views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise views are supported by a smaller set of listings. One remark explicitly references 'sunrises,' and the historical MLS data shows SUNRIS in 3/20 listings, suggesting this is a real but less commonly advertised feature. Confidence is good, but the evidence base is thinner than for ocean or sunset views.
Sunset views are strongly supported across multiple listings and agents. Remarks explicitly reference 'beautiful sunset views,' 'perfect Hawaiian Sunset,' and 'enjoying the natural light and views of the mountains, sunrises and even sunsets.' This appears to be a genuine and repeatable building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported for this building. Multiple current listings explicitly say "resident manager," including amenity descriptions like "Amenities include swimming pool and resident manager" and "has a swimming pool, resident manager." The evidence is consistent across multiple remarks and aligns with the prior MLS checkbox pattern, so this appears to be a stable building-level feature rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.