Makaha Valley Towers

No analysis available

I searched the remarks for direct owner-occupancy clues such as a percentage, majority owner occupied, or highly owner occupied language and found none. Since this is rarely stated in MLS remarks, the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown from the provided text.

The remarks repeatedly reference elevator proximity and easy elevator access throughout the building, which fits a high-rise with multiple elevators. No listing directly states a different elevator count, so the current value of 4 is supported and retained.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Central air conditioning is one of the most consistently documented inclusions, with 18/20 MLS records showing ACCEN. Public remarks repeatedly reinforce this with phrases like "central AC," "central air," and "maintenance fee includes... air conditioning," across many listings and agents.

Cable TV is consistently confirmed across the building, with 19/20 MLS records showing CABTV and many public remarks explicitly stating "cable TV included" or listing cable among all-inclusive utilities. The evidence is strong and repetitive across multiple listings, suggesting this is a true building-level inclusion rather than a copy-paste anomaly.

Common area expenses are broadly supported by the MLS inclusion code OTCOEX and by remarks referencing “common area expenses” or similar building-wide costs. This appears consistently across the building, though some remarks are more generic than others.

No analysis available

Electricity is repeatedly and explicitly included across the listings, supported by 18/20 MLS records showing ELECTR. Remarks frequently list electricity alongside water, sewer, AC, cable, and internet, indicating strong building-level consistency rather than isolated mention.

Evidence does not support gas being included in HOA fees: only 2 of 20 MLS checkbox entries and abundant remarks mention gas for BBQs (amenity) rather than gas utility. No agent remarks explicitly say "gas included" in maintenance fees, so set false to correct likely past over-attribution.

Hot water is consistently described as included in the maintenance fee, with 18/20 MLS records coded HOTWAT and numerous remarks stating "hot water included" or listing it with the utilities. Although a few listings show WTRHTR, the overwhelming pattern still supports hot water as a building inclusion.

Internet service is strongly and repeatedly documented, with 19/20 MLS records showing INTSER. Public remarks commonly include phrases like "internet included," "basic internet," or "Spectrum Internet," making this one of the clearest building-level fee inclusions.

No analysis available

Sewer is the most consistently documented inclusion in the building, with 20/20 MLS listings showing SEWER. The public remarks are fully aligned, repeatedly listing sewer as part of the monthly maintenance fee across many listings and agents.

Water is repeatedly confirmed as included, with 19/20 MLS listings showing WATER. The remarks are highly consistent and often list water together with electricity, sewer, AC, cable, and internet, reinforcing that this is a true building-level expense inclusion.

BBQ/grilling amenities are strongly supported for this building. Dozens of current remarks mention them directly across many different listings and agents, with phrases like "BBQ area," "barbecue area," "community grills," and "gas BBQ Area." The evidence is consistent and broad, so this appears to be a real shared amenity rather than copy-paste noise.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No listing remarks provided mention a car wash, auto wash, or vehicle wash station. With repeated detailed descriptions of other amenities but zero public-remarks support for car wash facilities, this appears to be an MLS checkbox likely checked inconsistently or by copy-paste rather than a confirmed building feature.

No clear evidence of a clubhouse/community center in the remarks: 0 of the provided public-remarks mention "clubhouse" or "community center," and only 1 of 20 MLS listings currently has CLUHOU checked. This likely indicates an agent checkbox anomaly rather than a true building amenity, but existing MLS data prevents a high-confidence correction.

No analysis available

One listing explicitly says the building has "a dog run for those who need to give your buddy a little break," which is direct evidence of a dog/pet area. Although current MLS only has 1/20 listings checking DGPRK, the remark is specific enough to support the feature. This appears to be a shared pet amenity, not a private unit feature.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

There is only limited historical support for a meeting room-type amenity, with about 4 of 20 listings showing MEEROO in MLS amenities. None of the current public remarks mention a meeting room, conference room, board room, hospitality room, or community room, and the language across listings is largely about views, pool, laundry, and security. This looks like weak, possibly copy-pasted MLS checkbox evidence rather than consistent remark-based confirmation.

Evidence strongly supports patio/deck amenities for this building. Across many current listings, agents mention "lanai," "private lanai," "covered lanai," "outdoor balcony," and "large lanai," including units with panoramic views and outdoor seating. Combined with the prior high-confidence MLS history, this is consistent and well supported across multiple remarks.

A small subset of MLS listings select the jogging-path amenity, and at least one agent-written remark includes “hiking paths” among the complex’s amenities while another highlights jogging around the community grounds. This suggests the property offers internal walking/jogging paths or trails that residents commonly use, though it is less prominently advertised than the pool or BBQ areas.

No analysis available

No listings describe a private or fenced yard—remarks consistently reference shared landscaped grounds, pool, BBQ areas, picnic tables and a dog run but never private yard access. Given low historical support, lack of corroborating remarks across the multiple listings, and only 1/20 MLS checkboxes claiming PRIYAR (likely an error), we set private_yard = false.

No analysis available

Recreation-area language appears in the public remarks, including explicit phrases like "recreation area" and similar shared amenity-space descriptions. The historical signal was already medium confidence, and the current MLS data shows 6/20 listings with RECARE, suggesting the amenity is present but not always copied consistently. The evidence is moderate-to-strong and likely building-level.

There is no clear public-remarks support for a recreation room. While a small number of current MLS listings check RECROO, the remarks consistently describe other amenities instead and do not mention a rec room, game room, or entertainment room. This looks like likely MLS checkbox noise rather than confirmed building amenity.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

Storage is strongly supported for Makaha Valley Towers. Across the provided remarks, numerous listings explicitly mention "storage locker," "extra storage," "additional storage space," and "storage closet" either in-unit or just outside the unit, plus surfboard/bike storage in the building. This appears consistent across multiple listings and agents, not just copy-paste MLS checkbox data.

The remarks clearly confirm surfboard storage amenities. I found direct matches including explicit "Surfboard Storage" wording and a listing that says "surfboard and bike storage."

No analysis available

Trash chute service is repeatedly and explicitly confirmed in the current remarks. Multiple listings mention "trash chute" or "trash chutes," sometimes with location details like being near the elevator or on the same floor, which reinforces that this is a building amenity. The evidence is strong across multiple agents and aligns with the current MLS history.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

Pool is strongly supported by the current remarks and MLS data. Well over 20 listings mention it, with phrases like "swimming pool," "resort-style amenities," "heated pool," and "heated saltwater pool" appearing consistently across many agents. The evidence is broad and repeated, not a one-off or copy-paste anomaly.

Heated pool is clearly supported by the remarks, with many listings explicitly saying "heated pool," "heated swimming pool," or "heated saltwater pool." This appears in numerous separate listings and agent descriptions, matching the MLS history and indicating a real building amenity rather than a checkbox error. The evidence is strong enough to keep the feature enabled.

This feature is strongly and repeatedly confirmed in the remarks. The listings directly and consistently identify the pool as saltwater/salt water, so this is high-confidence true.

Only 1 of 20 current listings shows washer/dryer in inclusions, and the public remarks do not consistently mention in-unit laundry. Most remarks instead refer to "community laundry," "laundry room on the same floor," or "laundry on every floor," so the evidence for true in-unit laundry is weak and may reflect MLS checkbox noise.

Community/shared laundry is very strongly supported for Makaha Valley Towers. Roughly 15/20 current listings show COMLAU in amenities, and many remarks explicitly say "community laundry," "on-site laundry," "laundry room on every floor," or "laundry facilities". The repeated wording across many listings suggests this is a real building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.

I searched for explicit payment language tied to the laundry area, such as coin laundry, card-operated machines, quarters, or laundry fees. The remarks confirm community/on-site laundry exists, but they do not say it requires payment. Based on the remarks alone, this remains unconfirmed and is treated as not evidenced.

The remarks repeatedly confirm laundry access by floor, including direct statements such as "community laundry on every floor" and mentions of laundry being close by on specific cores/floors. This is strong public-remark evidence that the building has community laundry available on every floor.

Parking is strongly confirmed across the building. The current remarks mention it in many listings with phrases like "1 parking," "one unassigned parking stall," "one assigned parking stall included," "open parking," and "two-unassigned parking stalls." This appears consistent across multiple agents and is not just copy-paste checkbox noise because the remarks often describe the parking type in detail.

Remarks consistently describe parking as 'unassigned,' 'open,' or 'parking is open with 1-assigned permit' rather than numbered/assigned stalls, and most MLS records do not flag ASSIGN.

No analysis available

The remarks support deeded parking with explicit language tying a stall to the unit. Although many listings mention assigned, unassigned, or rented parking, the deeded-parking statement is direct evidence.

No analysis available

I looked for a specific parking fee, monthly parking rental, or any quoted additional parking cost in the public remarks. The listings confirm parking may cost extra in some cases, but they never provide a concrete fee, so the monthly parking amount cannot be extracted.

Guest parking is repeatedly and explicitly confirmed in the remarks. Multiple listings state "guest parking," "ample guest parking," or "lots of parking for your guests," which aligns with the strong MLS history. The evidence is broad across many listings and agents, making this feature highly reliable for the building.

Secured entry for the building/parking environment is well supported. Several listings explicitly state “secured entry,” “gated community,” or “24-hour security with gated entrance,” indicating controlled access rather than a copy-paste anomaly.

No analysis available

No analysis available

I searched for terms like "parking waitlist," "waiting list," and instructions to join a queue for parking. Nothing in the remarks indicates a formal waitlist system, so this is best marked as false based on absence of evidence.

No analysis available

I searched for key card access, fob access, card reader, electronic access, and keycard entry. The building clearly has security and controlled/gated entry, but the remarks do not specify a card-based access system. Without explicit card/fob language, this feature is not supported by the public remarks.

Security guard service is strongly confirmed for Makaha Valley Towers. Dozens of current remarks explicitly mention "24-hour security," "24/7 security," "security patrol," "guarded/gated community," and similar phrasing, showing consistent coverage across many listings rather than a one-off remark. This aligns with the historical MLS data where 20/20 listings already carried the security guard amenity.

The listings directly confirm security patrol service. Multiple remarks mention 24-hour security patrol or patrol service, which matches this feature very strongly.

No analysis available

Central air conditioning is strongly supported across the building. Dozens of current listings mention it explicitly, including phrases such as 'central AC,' 'central air conditioning,' and 'air conditioning included in maintenance fees.' The evidence appears consistent across many agents and is not limited to a single listing or copy-paste error.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Concrete construction is very strongly supported for Makaha Valley Towers. Historical MLS data shows 20 of 20 listings marked CONCRE, and the current remarks are consistent with a concrete high-rise tower rather than any alternate construction type. There is no sign of an agent correction or contrary evidence across the listings.

Double-wall construction is not corroborated by the public remarks. The MLS data shows a minority of listings with DOUWAL, but the listing narratives are consistently silent on this point.

No analysis available

No public remarks reference masonry or stucco construction. With only a small minority of MLS records checked and no descriptive support, this feature is not validated.

There is no meaningful public-remark support for steel-frame construction. Despite 2 of 20 MLS records showing STEFRA, the remarks are silent on steel framing and appear to be generic copy/paste building descriptions.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

Above-ground construction is not meaningfully supported by the listing remarks. Although 4 of 20 MLS entries include ABOGRO, the remarks repeatedly describe the property as a high-rise tower and do not explicitly confirm any above-ground construction feature. This looks more like inconsistent MLS tagging than verified building information.

Brick construction is not supported by the public remarks for Makaha Valley Towers. Only 2 of 20 listings carry the BRICK tag, and the remarks across many agents repeatedly focus on views, amenities, and interior upgrades rather than masonry exterior details. The sparse MLS checkbox data appears inconsistent and likely unreliable.

No analysis available

The public remarks clearly show that short-term rental use is allowed at least on a 30-day basis. That satisfies the STR-allowed criterion, and there are no contrary remarks overriding it.

I searched for any hotel pool or hotel-managed rental program language and found none. The listings discuss owner use and standard rentals, not participation in a hotel pool.

I looked for mandatory participation language such as required rental program, cannot opt out, or must rent. The remarks show flexibility rather than obligation, so mandatory pool participation is not supported.

No analysis available

No analysis available

I searched for lease expiry language such as "lease expires [year]," "ground lease ends," "renewed through," and other explicit expiration dates. The remarks confirm some units are leasehold, but they do not state a lease expiration year, so the value remains unknown.

The public remarks directly confirm VA loan eligibility for this building. I found explicit approval language in multiple listings, which is strong evidence that VA financing is accepted.

I looked for HOA insurance wording indicating the building is fully insured or has walls-in coverage, but the remarks do not mention insurance status. There is therefore no public-remarks evidence to support a fully insured determination.

A small minority of current listings (2 of 20) include FIRSPR in the MLS amenities, but the public remarks do not independently confirm it. Because there are no agent/site-visit remarks mentioning sprinkler systems, this looks like weak MLS-only evidence rather than strong building-wide confirmation.

I searched the public remarks for building-level fire/life-safety language such as FLSE, fire inspection, certified safe, or life-safety compliant statements and found nothing. Based on the remarks alone, there is no evidence to confirm the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are strongly confirmed building-wide. Dozens of remarks explicitly say “ocean views,” “sweeping ocean views,” “coastline views,” and “Pacific Ocean,” across multiple agents and unit types. The pattern is consistent and does not look like an isolated copy-paste error.

Mountain views are clearly confirmed throughout the building. The remarks repeatedly reference “Waianae Mountains,” “majestic mountains,” and “mountain and ocean views” in many separate listings. Evidence is broad and consistent across listings, not dependent on one agent.

No analysis available

No listings mention city/downtown/cityscape views. The public remarks consistently highlight ocean, mountain, coastline and sunsets but contain no references to city views, so city view is not offered/advertised for this building.

Coastline views are well confirmed for this building. Multiple remarks use clear phrasing such as “coastline views,” “gorgeous coastline,” and “coastal scenery,” making this a consistent building-level feature rather than isolated copy-paste.

Garden-style views are supported by both historical MLS data and current remarks. Multiple listings describe “beautifully landscaped grounds,” “lush tropical grounds,” and “garden area,” indicating that at least some units overlook landscaped/common green areas. The evidence is moderate to strong and repeated across listings.

Golf course views appear to exist in some units, though not as universally as ocean or mountain views. Remarks include explicit phrases like “golf course views” and “mountains, golf course & sunset views,” plus several mentions of proximity to Makaha Golf Course/Country Club. This supports a building-level feature available in select units.

No analysis available

Sunrise views are directly supported, though less widespread than ocean and mountain views. Several remarks explicitly say things like “wake up to sunrises over the valley” and “enjoy your morning coffee,” which is enough to confirm the feature for some units in the building.

Sunset views are heavily supported across the listing set. Many remarks explicitly say “sunset views,” “stunning sunsets,” “ocean sunsets,” or “watch the sun set,” often alongside ocean views. The consistency across many listings makes this a strong building-wide feature for some units.

No analysis available

I searched for direct references to fireworks views from the building, lanai, or individual units. The remarks focus on ocean, mountain, coastline, sunset, and valley views, but nothing about fireworks. There is no public-remarks evidence for this feature.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Resident manager is strongly supported for this building. Multiple listings explicitly mention an "on-site resident manager," "on-site management office," or "onsite manager operations," and this is consistent with the prior MLS RESMAN amenity data. The evidence appears repeated across different remarks rather than a single copy-pasted reference.

No analysis available

No analysis available