Makaha Valley Towers
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Makaha Valley Towers
Building Overview
Makaha Valley Towers on the Waianae Coast — concrete building (1970) with ocean/mountain views, pool and central air.
About Makaha Valley Towers
Makaha Valley Towers is a concrete residential building located on the Waianae Coast, originally built in 1970. Size and unit count are not specified in the provided MLS data. Construction is listed as concrete and the building is noted for ocean, mountain and sunset views.
Amenities noted in MLS records include a pool, BBQ area, a resident manager and a security guard. Air conditioning is central. Management company is listed as unknown in the available data.
Parking is available and guest parking is noted. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed according to the MLS information. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, fees and rules with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I reviewed all public remarks for explicit owner-occupancy percentages or clear language about owner vs. tenant mix. None of the listings include a numeric percentage or explicit owner-occupancy statement. Because there is no explicit numeric evidence in remarks, I cannot supply or change a numeric owner-occupancy value.
I searched all public remarks for explicit elevator counts (e.g., "4 elevators", "four elevators", "multiple elevators"). Many listings reference proximity to or use of elevators but none state a number. Because no numeric count is provided in remarks, I cannot infer or change a numeric value.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
Overwhelming, building-wide evidence: all current MLS entries (20/20) list central AC included and numerous agent remarks explicitly state "central A/C included" or "all utilities/central air included." This is consistent across many agents and listings.
Very strong and consistent evidence across listings: ~19 of 20 MLS entries indicate cable is included, and agent remarks repeatedly state phrases like "Cable TV included" and "cable" in maintenance fee descriptions. Multiple independent listings (not just one agent) confirm this, indicating a building-wide inclusion of cable in HOA fees.
Moderately strong evidence: many (about 14 of 20) MLS records and numerous remarks reference "other common expenses" or common-area coverage in HOA fees (e.g., "grounds maintenance", "common area expenses"). Evidence is widespread but not as universal as other utilities, so confidence is slightly lower.
No analysis available
Very strong and consistent evidence: electricity is listed as included in maintenance fees across virtually all MLS entries (20 of 20) and many public remarks state "electricity included," supporting a building-wide inclusion.
Evidence does not support gas being included in HOA fees: only 2 of 20 MLS checkbox entries and abundant remarks mention gas for BBQs (amenity) rather than gas utility. No agent remarks explicitly say "gas included" in maintenance fees, so set false to correct likely past over-attribution.
Strong building-level evidence: all current MLS entries (20/20) list hot water included and many agent remarks explicitly say "hot water included." Although one listing references a unit hot water heater (WTRHTR), the preponderance of listings and remarks indicate hot water is provided and included in HOA fees.
Solid evidence: a majority of MLS records (about 16 of 20) and numerous agent remarks mention internet or basic internet being included. Multiple independent listings reference "internet included," indicating it is a commonly offered building amenity.
No analysis available
Very strong and consistent evidence: sewer is listed as included across all current MLS entries (20 of 20) and numerous public remarks explicitly mention sewer included alongside water, indicating a building-wide inclusion.
Very strong and consistent evidence: water is included in maintenance fees in virtually all MLS entries (20 of 20) and agent remarks repeatedly state "water included," demonstrating building-wide inclusion.
Strong evidence across the listing set: 20 of 20 listings list BBQ in amenities and numerous remarks state phrases like "BBQ area", "BBQ areas", "gas BBQ grills", and "barbecue picnic area." Mentions appear across multiple agents and units (not isolated to a single listing), indicating a building-level shared amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks across the provided listings mention car wash facilities (0 mentions). Given the absence in remarks despite many other amenities being repeatedly called out, car-wash listings appear to be agent checkbox entries rather than discussed building features; evidence is insufficient to support including car_wash.
No clear evidence of a clubhouse/community center in the remarks: 0 of the provided public-remarks mention "clubhouse" or "community center," and only 1 of 20 MLS listings currently has CLUHOU checked. This likely indicates an agent checkbox anomaly rather than a true building amenity, but existing MLS data prevents a high-confidence correction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate evidence: MLS checkbox history shows 7 of 20 listings listing meeting/conference-type amenities, and several remarks mention community/recreation or "resident work space" or "recreation spaces." Mentions are limited across listings and sometimes phrased generically, so inclusion is implied rather than firmly documented.
Strong evidence across many listings: dozens of remarks reference lanais/balconies/lanai (e.g., "515 sq ft w/74 sf Lanai," "60 sq ft lanai," "private lanai" and numerous mentions of "balcony/lanai"). Multiple agents consistently describe private outdoor balconies/lanai as unit features (not isolated copy-paste), so the building clearly offers patio/deck amenities.
A small subset of MLS listings select the jogging-path amenity, and at least one agent-written remark includes “hiking paths” among the complex’s amenities while another highlights jogging around the community grounds. This suggests the property offers internal walking/jogging paths or trails that residents commonly use, though it is less prominently advertised than the pool or BBQ areas.
No analysis available
No listings describe a private or fenced yard—remarks consistently reference shared landscaped grounds, pool, BBQ areas, picnic tables and a dog run but never private yard access. Given low historical support, lack of corroborating remarks across the multiple listings, and only 1/20 MLS checkboxes claiming PRIYAR (likely an error), we set private_yard = false.
No analysis available
Moderately strong evidence for a shared recreation area: current MLS shows 6 of 20 listings with RECARE and multiple remarks explicitly reference "recreation spaces/area" or "rec & BBQ area." Mentions appear across different listings and agents, supporting that the building offers communal recreation space in addition to pool/BBQ amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple agent remarks explicitly reference building or unit storage: phrases include “Storage,” “storage closet outside the unit,” “separate storage with the unit,” and “additional storage” (appearing in at least ~12 listings). Combined with prior MLS checkbox counts (7/20 in building amenities, 8/20 in unit features) this provides strong, consistent evidence that the building offers storage/lockers.
Listings include explicit mentions of surfboard storage (e.g., "Surfboard Storage", "dedicated surfboard storage"), indicating the building provides storage for surfboards.
No analysis available
Strong evidence across listings: 18 of 20 listings list trash chute in amenities and multiple remarks explicitly say "trash chute" or "trash chutes" (examples: "trash chutes", "trash chute on the same floor by the elevator"). This is consistently described across different listings/agents, supporting a high-confidence building-level amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence across listings that Makaha Valley Towers has a pool: 20/20 current MLS listings include the pool amenity and many public remarks explicitly mention a "heated pool", "heated saltwater pool", or "swimming pool." Mentions appear across multiple agents/listings rather than isolated copy-paste errors, supporting high confidence that the building offers a pool.
Evidence that the building's pool is heated is strong: many public remarks explicitly state "heated swimming pool", "heated saltwater pool", or "heated salt water pool" across multiple listings (at least a dozen excerpts in the aggregated remarks). This repeated explicit language from different listings/agents indicates the pool is heated.
Numerous listings call out a heated saltwater/salt water pool (e.g., "heated saltwater pool", "salt water pool"), providing strong evidence the pool is saltwater.
No analysis available
Both historical MLS checkbox data (COMLAU in 14/20 listings) and numerous current public remarks confirm shared laundry facilities at Makaha Valley Towers. Listings repeatedly state phrases like "community laundry", "laundry room on the same floor", "onsite laundry", and "laundry facilities" across many agents' remarks, indicating consistent building-level availability rather than isolated or erroneous listings.
I searched the public remarks for terms indicating paid laundry (e.g., 'coin', 'quarters', 'coin-op', 'card', 'paid laundry', 'card operated'). Many listings note community laundry, laundry on every floor, or 'ample laundry areas', but none describe a payment requirement or payment method. In absence of explicit statements, set to false with medium confidence.
Several listings explicitly state community laundry is available on every floor (e.g., "community laundry on every floor"). I searched the remarks for phrases like "laundry on each floor", "every floor", and "laundry room on every floor" and found multiple explicit matches.
Strong, consistent evidence across listings that the building provides parking: 20 of 20 MLS records list parking features and nearly every remark references an assigned or unassigned parking stall (e.g., '1 unassigned parking stall', 'one open parking space', 'two uncovered parking stalls'). Evidence is widespread across many agents/listings and aligns with historic data.
Remarks consistently describe parking as 'unassigned,' 'open,' or 'parking is open with 1-assigned permit' rather than numbered/assigned stalls, and most MLS records do not flag ASSIGN.
No analysis available
I searched for 'deeded', 'owned', and 'included in deed' across remarks. Several listings explicitly indicate at least one parking stall is deeded with the unit, so parking_deeded is set to true with high confidence.
No analysis available
Searched for explicit monthly parking fees (e.g., '$/month', 'per month', numeric amounts). Several listings note extra parking can be rented or available for a monthly charge, but no specific monthly fee amount is provided in the public remarks, so a numeric parking_fee cannot be determined.
Moderate-to-strong evidence that guest parking is available: MLS flags GUEST on 11 of 20 records and numerous remarks explicitly state 'guest parking', 'guest stalls available', or 'ample guest parking' (e.g., 'guest parking', 'numerous guest parking', 'additional guest parking'). Multiple agents reference visitor/guest stalls rather than isolated mentions, supporting inclusion.
Strong evidence that parking/entry is secured: 9 of 20 MLS records include SECENT and numerous remarks reference 'gated entry', 'secured entrance', '24-hour security', or 'security patrol' (e.g., 'gated community', 'secured/gated entrance', '24-hour security'). The security/gated entry language appears across multiple listings and agents, indicating a building-level secured entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like 'waitlist', 'waiting list', and 'join waitlist for parking' across all remarks. There are no references to a parking waitlist system; parking is described as assigned, unassigned, first-come-first-served, or available for rent, so parking_waitlist is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for evidence of electronic card/fob access (terms like 'key card access', 'fob', 'card reader', 'keycard entry', 'electronic access'). While many listings emphasize 24-hour security, guards, gated/secured entry, and security patrols, none explicitly describe card or fob access. Therefore, set to false with medium confidence.
Strong, consistent evidence that the building provides on-site security: 20/20 current MLS listings indicate SECGUA and many remarks explicitly state phrases like '24-hour security', '24-hour guard service', '24/7 security', and 'security patrol'. The mention is repeated across listings from multiple agents (not isolated copy/paste corrections), supporting high confidence that building security is provided.
Public remarks consistently reference 24-hour security, on-site guards, and security patrols (e.g., "24-hour security", "24-hr security station", "security patrol"), supporting that a security patrol service is present.
No analysis available
High historical consistency: 18 of 20 recent MLS records listed ACCEN in inclusions and 13 of 20 checked unit_features. Current listing remarks repeatedly state "central air" or "central AC" (examples: "maintenance fee includes central air," "central AC is included"), confirming building-wide central air. A small number of remarks reference being "away from the central air conditioning building," but the weight of multiple listings and MLS inclusions provides strong evidence the building offers central air.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence: 19 out of 20 current MLS records list 'CONCRE' in construction_materials. None of the public remarks explicitly mention construction type, but the consistent MLS checkbox entries across multiple listings/agents provide high confidence that the building is constructed of concrete.
Double-wall construction appears in only a small minority of MLS records (5 of 20) and is never mentioned in any of the extensive public remarks. Given that this is a reinforced-concrete high-rise, double-wall framing is structurally unlikely, so the few DOUWAL flags are best interpreted as agent misentries rather than a true building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Some MLS records (5 of 20) tag the building with ABOGRO, and the structure is a multi-story tower elevated well above grade. While remarks don’t use the specific term ‘above ground construction,’ the building’s form and the partial but repeated MLS tagging support treating construction_above_ground as present at moderate confidence.
Evidence for brick construction is weak: only 1/20 MLS records include 'BRICK' and none of the dozens of public remarks mention brick or brick-and-mortar construction. Given the lack of corroborating remarks and the strong concrete signal across listings, the brick entry likely reflects a listing error rather than an actual building feature.
No analysis available
I searched for 'short-term rental', 'vacation rental', '30-day minimum', 'AirBnB'. Multiple remarks explicitly reference 30-day minimums or indicate '30-day vacation rentals permitted', which indicates that short-term (<30-day) STRs are not permitted.
I searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', 'managed by hotel', and found no evidence. Because STR is not allowed (see str_allowed), hotel pool participation would be invalid; therefore this is false.
I searched for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', and similar phrases. There is no evidence of a mandatory rental-pool program and STR is not allowed, so mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched all public remarks for phrases like 'lease expires', 'leasehold to 20xx', 'renewed through', and explicit 4-digit years. Several listings note 'leasehold' or that rooftop lanais are 'subject to lease terms', but no specific lease expiry year is stated, so the expiry year is unknown.
Public remarks explicitly state VA approval and VA loan assumption/VA financing availability in multiple listings. I searched for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA assumable', and found explicit mentions.
I searched all public remarks for explicit insurance coverage language (e.g., "fully insured", "walls-in coverage", "comprehensive building insurance"). While many listings state what the maintenance fee covers (utilities, AC, water, cable, etc.), none state that the HOA provides full/walls-in building insurance. With no explicit mentions and no current verified value, I return false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched all public remarks for explicit language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation (FLSE) or similar certifications. There are no statements about FLSE or passing fire inspections. With no explicit mentions and no current verified value, I return false with medium confidence (absence of mention suggests none reported publicly).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Dozens of current listings explicitly advertise ocean or Pacific Ocean views (quotes include 'ocean view', 'unobstructed ocean views', 'wake up to sweeping ocean views'). Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and unit types (studios to penthouses), indicating the building reliably offers ocean-view units.
Numerous listings explicitly call out mountain or Waianae mountain views (quotes include 'mountain views', 'majestic Waianae mountain range', 'Makaha Valley mountains'). This strong, repeated language across agents and listings supports that the building offers mountain-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings mention coastline or shoreline perspectives (phrases include 'coastline', 'gorgeous coastline', 'partial views of the coastline'), and many ads note proximity to Makaha Beach and shoreline features, indicating coastline-view units are available in the building.
Many listings describe resort-like, landscaped grounds and gardens (phrases include 'lush & tropical landscaped gated complex', 'beautifully manicured grounds', 'garden area with picnic tables'), showing the property has notable garden/landscaped views and grounds accessible from units or common areas.
Several listings describe units with 'golf course & sunset views' or 'views of the mountains, golf course and unobstructed ocean', not just proximity to a course. Because these references recur across different units, buyers can reasonably expect that certain Makaha Valley Towers units offer true golf course views.
No analysis available
At least several listings go beyond generic view language and specifically mention 'sunrises' and 'sunrise to sunset' vistas from the units. These comments appear in different units and stacks (not a single copy-pasted remark), supporting that some residences are oriented to capture morning light and sunrise views over the valley and mountains. Together with earlier high-confidence data, this supports treating sunrise views as a real, building-available feature.
Numerous listings highlight sunset or evening views (quotes include 'breathtaking sunsets', 'watch the sun set', 'enjoy stunning sunsets'), and several units advertise lanai views specifically for sunset watching, demonstrating the building offers sunset-view units.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any language indicating that fireworks are visible from the building or units (phrases like 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from lanai', 'see fireworks from unit'). No listings mention fireworks visibility from units/building; many mention ocean/sunset/whale/watch surf/waterfalls but not fireworks. With no explicit statements, set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historical MLS data strongly supported an on-site resident manager (about 14 of 20 listings previously checked RESMAN). In the current public remarks at least 5 listings explicitly reference on-site management/manager operations or an on-site management office (e.g., "on-site resident manager operations," "on-site management office," "staffed office"), and many others reference a staffed/security presence—evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents, not just a single copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.