Makaha Valley Towers
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Makaha Valley Towers
Building Overview
Makaha Valley Towers on the Waianae Coast — concrete building (1970) with ocean/mountain views, pool and central air.
About Makaha Valley Towers
Makaha Valley Towers is a concrete residential building located on the Waianae Coast, originally built in 1970. Size and unit count are not specified in the provided MLS data. Construction is listed as concrete and the building is noted for ocean, mountain and sunset views.
Amenities noted in MLS records include a pool, BBQ area, a resident manager and a security guard. Air conditioning is central. Management company is listed as unknown in the available data.
Parking is available and guest parking is noted. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed according to the MLS information. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, fees and rules with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy details such as a percentage, majority owner occupied, or highly owner occupied. The remarks mostly describe individual units as owner-occupied or tenant-occupied, but that does not establish building-wide owner occupancy, so the value remains unknown.
The public remarks repeatedly mention units being close to the elevators, near elevator access, or not needing to use an elevator, which fits the stated building context of four elevators. No remarks contradict this, so the current value is retained with very high confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
Central air conditioning is one of the most consistently documented inclusions in the building. Numerous remarks explicitly mention “central A/C,” “AC central,” or “maintenance fee includes central air,” reinforcing the unanimous MLS data.
Cable TV is repeatedly confirmed across the listings, with 19/20 MLS records showing CABTV and many remarks stating “cable tv included,” “basic cable,” or listing cable among the included utilities. The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents, not just a single copied remark.
Common area expenses are broadly supported by the MLS inclusion code OTCOEX and by remarks referencing “common area expenses” or similar building-wide costs. This appears consistently across the building, though some remarks are more generic than others.
No analysis available
Electricity is explicitly included across the listings. Many remarks list it alongside water, sewer, AC, and cable, and the MLS data is unanimous, making this a very high-confidence building feature.
Evidence does not support gas being included in HOA fees: only 2 of 20 MLS checkbox entries and abundant remarks mention gas for BBQs (amenity) rather than gas utility. No agent remarks explicitly say "gas included" in maintenance fees, so set false to correct likely past over-attribution.
Hot water is consistently included in the maintenance fee across the building, with 18/20 MLS listings coded HOTWAT and numerous remarks saying “hot water included,” “hot and cold water,” or listing hot water among the utilities. A few units show WTRHTR in inclusions, but the overall evidence still overwhelmingly supports true.
Internet service is strongly and repeatedly described as included, with 18/20 MLS records showing INTSER and many remarks listing internet, Wi-Fi, or high-speed internet in the HOA fee. The pattern is broad and consistent across multiple listings, suggesting a building-level included utility.
No analysis available
Sewer is one of the most consistently documented inclusions in the building, with 20/20 MLS listings showing SEWER. Remarks across many listings explicitly list sewer alongside water, electricity, and AC, making this highly reliable.
Water is repeatedly confirmed as included in the maintenance fee, with 19/20 MLS listings showing WATER. The public remarks are highly consistent, often grouping water with sewer, electricity, and air conditioning, so this feature is very well supported.
BBQ/grilling amenities are strongly supported for this building. Dozens of current remarks mention them directly, including "BBQ area," "barbecue area," "BBQ/picnic area," "gas BBQ area," "community grills," and "Weber grills," showing broad agreement across many listings and agents. This aligns with the historical MLS data showing 20/20 listings with BBQ in amenities, so the feature should be retained with very high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks provided mention a car wash, auto wash, or vehicle wash station. With repeated detailed descriptions of other amenities but zero public-remarks support for car wash facilities, this appears to be an MLS checkbox likely checked inconsistently or by copy-paste rather than a confirmed building feature.
No clear evidence of a clubhouse/community center in the remarks: 0 of the provided public-remarks mention "clubhouse" or "community center," and only 1 of 20 MLS listings currently has CLUHOU checked. This likely indicates an agent checkbox anomaly rather than a true building amenity, but existing MLS data prevents a high-confidence correction.
No analysis available
One listing explicitly says the building has "a dog run for those who need to give your buddy a little break," which is direct evidence of a dog/pet area. Although current MLS only has 1/20 listings checking DGPRK, the remark is specific enough to support the feature. This appears to be a shared pet amenity, not a private unit feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is only limited historical support for a meeting room-type amenity, with about 4 of 20 listings showing MEEROO in MLS amenities. None of the current public remarks mention a meeting room, conference room, board room, hospitality room, or community room, and the language across listings is largely about views, pool, laundry, and security. This looks like weak, possibly copy-pasted MLS checkbox evidence rather than consistent remark-based confirmation.
Evidence strongly supports patio/deck amenities for this building. Across many current listings, agents mention "lanai," "private lanai," "covered lanai," "outdoor balcony," and "large lanai," including units with panoramic views and outdoor seating. Combined with the prior high-confidence MLS history, this is consistent and well supported across multiple remarks.
A small subset of MLS listings select the jogging-path amenity, and at least one agent-written remark includes “hiking paths” among the complex’s amenities while another highlights jogging around the community grounds. This suggests the property offers internal walking/jogging paths or trails that residents commonly use, though it is less prominently advertised than the pool or BBQ areas.
No analysis available
No listings describe a private or fenced yard—remarks consistently reference shared landscaped grounds, pool, BBQ areas, picnic tables and a dog run but never private yard access. Given low historical support, lack of corroborating remarks across the multiple listings, and only 1/20 MLS checkboxes claiming PRIYAR (likely an error), we set private_yard = false.
No analysis available
Recreation-area language appears in the public remarks, including explicit phrases like "recreation area" and similar shared amenity-space descriptions. The historical signal was already medium confidence, and the current MLS data shows 6/20 listings with RECARE, suggesting the amenity is present but not always copied consistently. The evidence is moderate-to-strong and likely building-level.
There is no clear public-remarks support for a recreation room. While a small number of current MLS listings check RECROO, the remarks consistently describe other amenities instead and do not mention a rec room, game room, or entertainment room. This looks like likely MLS checkbox noise rather than confirmed building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported for Makaha Valley Towers. Across the provided remarks, numerous listings explicitly mention "storage locker," "extra storage," "additional storage space," and "storage closet" either in-unit or just outside the unit, plus surfboard/bike storage in the building. This appears consistent across multiple listings and agents, not just copy-paste MLS checkbox data.
The remarks clearly confirm surfboard storage amenities. I searched for surfboard/board storage language and found direct matches, including an explicit mention of surfboard storage. This is a high-confidence true.
No analysis available
Trash chute is repeatedly and explicitly confirmed across the current remarks, with phrases such as "trash chutes," "trash chute," and "community laundry and trash chute." The historical MLS data is also very strong, with 19 of 20 listings including TRACHU, making this a highly reliable building feature. The consistency across many listings suggests this is not a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool amenity is supported by a very large number of current public remarks, with dozens of listings explicitly mentioning a pool. Multiple agents describe it in consistent detail as a 'heated swimming pool,' 'heated saltwater pool,' or 'resort-style pool,' indicating this is a shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste checkbox error. Historical MLS data is also unanimous (20/20 listings), so confidence is extremely high.
The heated-pool feature is strongly supported by the public remarks and MLS history. Many listings explicitly say things like "heated swimming pool," "heated pool," "heated saltwater pool," and even "heated salt water pool," indicating the amenity is consistently advertised by multiple agents. Although not every MLS record uses the heated-pool checkbox, the remarks provide abundant direct confirmation.
This feature is strongly and repeatedly confirmed in the remarks. I found multiple direct references to a saltwater or salt water pool, which exactly matches the feature definition. Confidence is very high.
Only 1 of 20 current listings shows washer/dryer in inclusions, and the public remarks do not consistently mention in-unit laundry. Most remarks instead refer to "community laundry," "laundry room on the same floor," or "laundry on every floor," so the evidence for true in-unit laundry is weak and may reflect MLS checkbox noise.
Community/shared laundry is very strongly supported for Makaha Valley Towers. Across the provided remarks, many listings explicitly mention it in different forms, including "on-site laundry room," "community laundry," "laundry room on every floor," and "near the laundry facilities." The repeated references across numerous listings and agents make this a high-confidence building feature.
I searched the remarks for explicit paid-laundry wording such as coin laundry, coin-op, card-operated machines, quarters, or laundry fees. The listings mention community laundry and on-site laundry, but none say it requires payment. With no evidence either way, this remains false by default with low confidence.
The public remarks repeatedly and directly confirm laundry access on every floor. I looked for floor-specific laundry references such as "on every floor" or "same floor" and found strong matches, including direct statements that community laundry is available on every floor. This is a high-confidence true.
Parking is strongly confirmed throughout the listing remarks, with dozens of units referencing assigned, unassigned, open, guest, or included parking stalls. Examples include phrases like '1 parking stall,' 'one unassigned parking space,' 'ample guest parking,' and 'two-unassigned parking stalls,' showing this is a building-wide amenity rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Remarks consistently describe parking as 'unassigned,' 'open,' or 'parking is open with 1-assigned permit' rather than numbered/assigned stalls, and most MLS records do not flag ASSIGN.
No analysis available
The remarks strongly support deeded parking. There is direct language stating a parking space is deeded with the unit, which is clear evidence rather than an inference.
No analysis available
I looked for a specific monthly parking fee or rental amount in the remarks. Several listings mention parking access, guest parking, or that additional stalls may be rented, but none provide a numeric parking fee.
Guest parking is repeatedly confirmed in the remarks across many listings, often alongside other amenity descriptions. The wording is consistent enough across multiple agents to indicate this is a real shared building amenity rather than a checkbox error.
Secured entry for the building/parking environment is well supported. Several listings explicitly state “secured entry,” “gated community,” or “24-hour security with gated entrance,” indicating controlled access rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for any reference to a parking waitlist or joining a queue for parking and found none. The listings describe parking as available, unassigned, deeded, or rentable, which does not suggest a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for card access indicators such as key card, fob access, card reader, keycard entry, or electronic access. The listings do describe the building as gated, secured, and patrolled, but they do not specifically mention a card-based access system. With no direct evidence, this is marked false with low confidence.
Security guard service is strongly confirmed for Makaha Valley Towers. Dozens of current remarks across multiple agents explicitly mention "24-hour security," "24/7 security," "security patrol," and "security guards/guard service," matching the MLS amenities data. The evidence is consistent and repeated, not just a one-off copy-paste claim.
The listings directly confirm security patrol service. I found explicit references to 24-hour security patrol and security patrol service, which match the feature definition exactly. This is a high-confidence true.
No analysis available
Central air conditioning is strongly supported across the building. Dozens of current remarks explicitly mention phrases like “central A/C,” “central air,” “central air conditioning,” “AC central,” and “maintenance fee includes central air,” appearing consistently across multiple listings and agents rather than isolated copy-paste errors. The evidence is overwhelming and aligns with the previously high-confidence MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is very strongly supported for Makaha Valley Towers. Historical MLS data shows 20 of 20 listings marked CONCRE, and the current public remarks do not introduce any conflicting construction detail. This appears to be a stable building-level fact rather than copy-paste noise.
Double-wall construction is not corroborated by the public remarks. The MLS data shows a minority of listings with DOUWAL, but the listing narratives are consistently silent on this point.
No analysis available
No public remarks reference masonry or stucco construction. With only a small minority of MLS records checked and no descriptive support, this feature is not validated.
There is no meaningful public-remark support for steel-frame construction. Despite 2 of 20 MLS records showing STEFRA, the remarks are silent on steel framing and appear to be generic copy/paste building descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction is not meaningfully supported by the listing remarks. Although 4 of 20 MLS entries include ABOGRO, the remarks repeatedly describe the property as a high-rise tower and do not explicitly confirm any above-ground construction feature. This looks more like inconsistent MLS tagging than verified building information.
Brick construction is not supported by the public remarks for Makaha Valley Towers. Only 2 of 20 listings carry the BRICK tag, and the remarks across many agents repeatedly focus on views, amenities, and interior upgrades rather than masonry exterior details. The sparse MLS checkbox data appears inconsistent and likely unreliable.
No analysis available
Short-term rental use is allowed at least on a 30-day basis, which satisfies the STR-allowed criterion. Multiple remarks explicitly reference 30-day vacation rentals and AirBnB use.
I searched for references to a hotel rental pool, hotel-managed operations, or branded pool programs and found none. The remarks discuss owner use and 30-day rentals, but nothing about participation in a hotel pool.
I looked for any indication that owners must participate in a rental pool or cannot opt out, and found none. The listings suggest flexible owner use and permitted 30-day rentals, which is inconsistent with a mandatory pool requirement.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for lease-expiry language such as a year, ground lease end date, renewal, or extension terms. The remarks mention leasehold in one listing and rooftop lanai lease terms in another, but none provide a specific expiration year.
The public remarks directly confirm VA financing availability for this building. Multiple listings reinforce this with explicit VA approval language and VA assumable-loan references.
I looked for HOA insurance references that would indicate the building is fully insured or has walls-in coverage. The remarks discuss maintenance fees and utilities, but they do not mention full building insurance coverage, so this is left unconfirmed and treated as false by absence of evidence.
A small minority of current listings (2 of 20) include FIRSPR in the MLS amenities, but the public remarks do not independently confirm it. Because there are no agent/site-visit remarks mentioning sprinkler systems, this looks like weak MLS-only evidence rather than strong building-wide confirmation.
I searched the remarks for building-level fire/life-safety wording such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, and passed fire inspection. Nothing in the public remarks confirms that the building has passed this evaluation, so this remains unverified and is treated as false by absence of evidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly confirmed building-wide. Across the remarks, nearly every listing references ocean views in phrases like “sweeping ocean views,” “Pacific Ocean,” “ocean water,” and “unobstructed ocean views,” indicating this is not a one-off agent claim but a consistent building feature.
Mountain views are confirmed throughout the listing set. The remarks are highly consistent, with many mentions of “Waianae mountain range,” “majestic mountains,” and “mountains to the ocean,” showing broad agreement across listings and agents.
No analysis available
No listings mention city/downtown/cityscape views. The public remarks consistently highlight ocean, mountain, coastline and sunsets but contain no references to city views, so city view is not offered/advertised for this building.
Coastline views are well confirmed for this building. Multiple remarks use clear phrasing such as “coastline views,” “gorgeous coastline,” and “coastal scenery,” making this a consistent building-level feature rather than isolated copy-paste.
Garden-style views are supported by both the historical MLS data and the remarks. Several listings mention “lush tropical gardens,” “beautifully landscaped grounds,” “manicured gardens,” and “tropical greenery,” which fits the feature definition. The evidence is moderate but clearly recurring across multiple listings.
Golf course views are supported by multiple remarks, though not as broadly as ocean or mountain views. Several listings explicitly mention 'golf course & sunset views' or views including golf course, while others reference proximity to Makaha Valley Country Club or golf nearby. The evidence suggests this is a real but limited view type available in some units.
No analysis available
Sunrise views are directly supported, though less widespread than ocean and mountain views. Several remarks explicitly say things like “wake up to sunrises over the valley” and “enjoy your morning coffee,” which is enough to confirm the feature for some units in the building.
Sunset views are heavily supported across the listings. Remarks repeatedly say “sunset views,” “stunning sunsets,” “ocean sunsets,” and “watch the sun set,” including several units with lanai-facing sunset exposure. The feature appears consistently represented across many agents and listings.
No analysis available
I looked for direct statements about fireworks views from the units, lanai, or building, not just proximity to fireworks events. The remarks discuss ocean, sunset, mountain, and coastline views, but nothing about fireworks visibility. With no explicit mention, this is marked false with low confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported for this building. Multiple listings explicitly mention an "on-site resident manager," "on-site management office," or "onsite manager operations," and this is consistent with the prior MLS RESMAN amenity data. The evidence appears repeated across different remarks rather than a single copy-pasted reference.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.