Makaha Valley Towers
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Makaha Valley Towers
Building Overview
Makaha Valley Towers on the Waianae Coast — concrete building (1970) with ocean/mountain views, pool and central air.
About Makaha Valley Towers
Makaha Valley Towers is a concrete residential building located on the Waianae Coast, originally built in 1970. Size and unit count are not specified in the provided MLS data. Construction is listed as concrete and the building is noted for ocean, mountain and sunset views.
Amenities noted in MLS records include a pool, BBQ area, a resident manager and a security guard. Air conditioning is central. Management company is listed as unknown in the available data.
Parking is available and guest parking is noted. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed according to the MLS information. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, fees and rules with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for occupancy clues such as an owner-occupied percentage or phrases like majority owner occupied, but none were present. The listings do mention tenant-occupied and owner-occupied units on a case-by-case basis, but not building-wide occupancy statistics. Therefore, no owner-occupancy percentage can be derived from these remarks.
Public remarks consistently reference elevator access, elevator proximity, and units located near or beside elevators, confirming the building has elevators. No remark states a different elevator count, so the current value of 4 should be kept. The evidence supports the existing value with high confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
Central air conditioning is one of the most consistently documented inclusions in the building. Numerous remarks explicitly mention “central A/C,” “AC central,” or “maintenance fee includes central air,” reinforcing the unanimous MLS data.
Cable TV is strongly confirmed across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly state “cable tv included,” “basic cable,” or list cable among the utilities covered in the maintenance fee, matching the strong MLS pattern.
Common area expenses are supported by both the MLS inclusion code and public remarks. Several listings explicitly mention “common area expenses” or “other common expenses,” indicating this is a building-level fee inclusion rather than an isolated copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Electricity is explicitly included across the listings. Many remarks list it alongside water, sewer, AC, and cable, and the MLS data is unanimous, making this a very high-confidence building feature.
Evidence does not support gas being included in HOA fees: only 2 of 20 MLS checkbox entries and abundant remarks mention gas for BBQs (amenity) rather than gas utility. No agent remarks explicitly say "gas included" in maintenance fees, so set false to correct likely past over-attribution.
Hot water is broadly confirmed throughout the listings. Many remarks say “hot water included,” “hot and cold water,” or include hot water in the utility bundle, matching the strong MLS evidence.
Internet service is repeatedly described as included in the HOA or maintenance fee. Listings often pair it with cable and other utilities, indicating this is a standard building inclusion rather than an occasional seller note.
No analysis available
Sewer is consistently documented as included across the building. The remarks repeatedly list sewer together with water, electricity, and AC, and the MLS data is unanimous.
Water is a consistently documented included utility in both the remarks and MLS data. Many listings explicitly list water in the fee coverage, often bundled with sewer, electricity, and central AC.
BBQ is strongly supported: dozens of listings mention a "BBQ area," "barbecue area," "BBQ/picnic area," "gas BBQ area," or "community grills." The consistency across many agents and many remark sets suggests this is a stable shared building amenity rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks provided mention a car wash, auto wash, or vehicle wash station. With repeated detailed descriptions of other amenities but zero public-remarks support for car wash facilities, this appears to be an MLS checkbox likely checked inconsistently or by copy-paste rather than a confirmed building feature.
No clear evidence of a clubhouse/community center in the remarks: 0 of the provided public-remarks mention "clubhouse" or "community center," and only 1 of 20 MLS listings currently has CLUHOU checked. This likely indicates an agent checkbox anomaly rather than a true building amenity, but existing MLS data prevents a high-confidence correction.
No analysis available
One listing explicitly says the building has "a dog run for those who need to give your buddy a little break," which is direct evidence of a dog/pet area. Although current MLS only has 1/20 listings checking DGPRK, the remark is specific enough to support the feature. This appears to be a shared pet amenity, not a private unit feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is only limited historical support for a meeting room-type amenity, with about 4 of 20 listings showing MEEROO in MLS amenities. None of the current public remarks mention a meeting room, conference room, board room, hospitality room, or community room, and the language across listings is largely about views, pool, laundry, and security. This looks like weak, possibly copy-pasted MLS checkbox evidence rather than consistent remark-based confirmation.
Evidence strongly supports patio/deck amenities for this building. Across many current listings, agents mention "lanai," "private lanai," "covered lanai," "outdoor balcony," and "large lanai," including units with panoramic views and outdoor seating. Combined with the prior high-confidence MLS history, this is consistent and well supported across multiple remarks.
A small subset of MLS listings select the jogging-path amenity, and at least one agent-written remark includes “hiking paths” among the complex’s amenities while another highlights jogging around the community grounds. This suggests the property offers internal walking/jogging paths or trails that residents commonly use, though it is less prominently advertised than the pool or BBQ areas.
No analysis available
No listings describe a private or fenced yard—remarks consistently reference shared landscaped grounds, pool, BBQ areas, picnic tables and a dog run but never private yard access. Given low historical support, lack of corroborating remarks across the multiple listings, and only 1/20 MLS checkboxes claiming PRIYAR (likely an error), we set private_yard = false.
No analysis available
Recreation-area language appears in the public remarks, including explicit phrases like "recreation area" and similar shared amenity-space descriptions. The historical signal was already medium confidence, and the current MLS data shows 6/20 listings with RECARE, suggesting the amenity is present but not always copied consistently. The evidence is moderate-to-strong and likely building-level.
There is no clear public-remarks support for a recreation room. While a small number of current MLS listings check RECROO, the remarks consistently describe other amenities instead and do not mention a rec room, game room, or entertainment room. This looks like likely MLS checkbox noise rather than confirmed building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported for Makaha Valley Towers. Across the provided remarks, numerous listings explicitly mention "storage locker," "extra storage," "additional storage space," and "storage closet" either in-unit or just outside the unit, plus surfboard/bike storage in the building. This appears consistent across multiple listings and agents, not just copy-paste MLS checkbox data.
The remarks directly confirm surfboard storage amenities. I also found supporting language about easy access for surfboards, which reinforces that the building accommodates board storage.
No analysis available
Trash chute is repeatedly and explicitly confirmed across the current remarks, with phrases such as "trash chutes," "trash chute," and "community laundry and trash chute." The historical MLS data is also very strong, with 19 of 20 listings including TRACHU, making this a highly reliable building feature. The consistency across many listings suggests this is not a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool amenity is supported by a very large number of current public remarks, with dozens of listings explicitly mentioning a pool. Multiple agents describe it in consistent detail as a 'heated swimming pool,' 'heated saltwater pool,' or 'resort-style pool,' indicating this is a shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste checkbox error. Historical MLS data is also unanimous (20/20 listings), so confidence is extremely high.
The heated-pool feature is strongly supported by the public remarks and MLS history. Many listings explicitly say things like "heated swimming pool," "heated pool," "heated saltwater pool," and even "heated salt water pool," indicating the amenity is consistently advertised by multiple agents. Although not every MLS record uses the heated-pool checkbox, the remarks provide abundant direct confirmation.
This feature is directly and repeatedly confirmed in the remarks. The pool is clearly described as saltwater/salt water in multiple listings, matching the definition exactly.
Only 1 of 20 current listings shows washer/dryer in inclusions, and the public remarks do not consistently mention in-unit laundry. Most remarks instead refer to "community laundry," "laundry room on the same floor," or "laundry on every floor," so the evidence for true in-unit laundry is weak and may reflect MLS checkbox noise.
Community/shared laundry is very strongly supported for this building. Multiple current listings explicitly mention it in different ways, including "on-site laundry room," "community laundry," "laundry room on every floor," "laundry facilities," and "ample laundry areas." The consistency across many remarks and agents makes this a high-confidence shared building feature.
I searched for any indication that the community laundry requires payment, such as coin laundry, card readers, quarters, or laundry fees. The remarks only mention the presence and location of laundry facilities, not whether they are paid.
The remarks directly match the feature definition with explicit references to laundry on every floor. I also saw several corroborating mentions of laundry being close to elevators and in specific cores/floors, reinforcing that this is a floor-by-floor amenity.
Parking is strongly confirmed across the listing remarks, with many units explicitly mentioning assigned, unassigned, open, or included parking stalls. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and listing styles, not just copied boilerplate, so this is a reliable building-level amenity.
Remarks consistently describe parking as 'unassigned,' 'open,' or 'parking is open with 1-assigned permit' rather than numbered/assigned stalls, and most MLS records do not flag ASSIGN.
No analysis available
The public remarks support that parking is deeded or included with the unit. The clearest evidence is the explicit phrase "deeded with the unit," which strongly confirms this feature.
No analysis available
I searched for a specific monthly parking fee, parking rental price, or additional parking charge amount. The remarks indicate some parking is first-come-first-served or rentable, but they do not state a numeric parking fee.
Guest parking is repeatedly confirmed in the remarks across many listings, often alongside other amenity descriptions. The wording is consistent enough across multiple agents to indicate this is a real shared building amenity rather than a checkbox error.
Secured entry for the building/parking environment is well supported. Several listings explicitly state “secured entry,” “gated community,” or “24-hour security with gated entrance,” indicating controlled access rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist or waiting-list language and found none. Several remarks instead suggest open or first-come parking, which points away from a formal waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for card/fob-based access language and found only general security wording such as secured entry, gated entry, and controlled access. Those phrases indicate security, but they do not specifically confirm a card-access system.
Security guard service is strongly confirmed for Makaha Valley Towers. Dozens of listings explicitly reference "24-hour security," "24/7 security," "security patrol," "secured/gated entry," or "on-duty security," and the current MLS data shows 20/20 listings with SECGUA checked. The evidence is consistent across many agents and time periods, so this feature should be treated as reliably present.
The listings directly confirm patrol service at the building. Multiple remarks go beyond general security and specifically name security patrol, which satisfies the feature.
No analysis available
Central air conditioning is strongly supported across the building. Dozens of current remarks explicitly mention phrases like “central A/C,” “central air,” “central air conditioning,” “AC central,” and “maintenance fee includes central air,” appearing consistently across multiple listings and agents rather than isolated copy-paste errors. The evidence is overwhelming and aligns with the previously high-confidence MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is very strongly supported for Makaha Valley Towers. Historical MLS data shows 20 of 20 listings marked CONCRE, and none of the public remarks conflict with that. The listing descriptions consistently refer to a high-rise tower, which aligns with the concrete construction designation.
Double-wall construction is not corroborated by the public remarks. The MLS data shows a minority of listings with DOUWAL, but the listing narratives are consistently silent on this point.
No analysis available
No public remarks reference masonry or stucco construction. With only a small minority of MLS records checked and no descriptive support, this feature is not validated.
There is no meaningful public-remark support for steel-frame construction. Despite 2 of 20 MLS records showing STEFRA, the remarks are silent on steel framing and appear to be generic copy/paste building descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 out of 20 MLS listings include the ABOGRO construction tag, while the majority of listings and public remarks do not reference or confirm 'above ground' construction. This suggests a possibility that some records were marked ABOGRO (perhaps for certain units) but the evidence is limited and inconsistent across agents, so confidence is moderate-to-low.
Brick construction does not appear in the public remarks. The sparse MLS checkbox data is not reinforced by any listing descriptions, so this looks like an unverified or copied MLS entry.
No analysis available
Short-term rentals are allowed at least at a 30-day minimum based on the public remarks. That is enough to mark STR as allowed for this building.
I searched for hotel pool references such as hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, or branded pool programs and found none. Since STR is allowed but no hotel pool program is mentioned, this remains false.
I looked for language suggesting a mandatory rental pool, required participation, or inability to opt out, but found nothing. The remarks support STR being allowed without any indication that rental-pool participation is mandatory.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold expiration language such as lease expires, ground lease ends, renewed through, or a 4-digit expiry year, but found no explicit year. A few remarks mention lease terms or leasehold units, but none provide a usable expiration date.
Public remarks directly confirm that VA financing is available for this building. Multiple listings reinforce this with explicit VA approval/assumption language, so confidence is very high.
I looked for explicit insurance wording indicating the HOA provides full or walls-in coverage, but the remarks do not mention it. There is no basis in the public remarks to mark the building as fully insured. This feature remains unknown from the available text.
A small minority of current listings (2 of 20) include FIRSPR in the MLS amenities, but the public remarks do not independently confirm it. Because there are no agent/site-visit remarks mentioning sprinkler systems, this looks like weak MLS-only evidence rather than strong building-wide confirmation.
I searched the remarks for direct fire/life safety language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection, but found nothing. Because there is no explicit public-remarks evidence, this remains unknown. The current remarks do not confirm or deny compliance status.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly confirmed building-wide. Dozens of remarks mention “ocean views,” “Pacific Ocean,” “sparkling ocean,” and “unobstructed ocean views,” including units described as ocean-facing or with views from the lanai and floor-to-ceiling windows. This appears consistent across many agents rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Mountain views are confirmed throughout the listing set. Nearly every remark references the “Waianae mountain range,” “lush mountains,” or “mountain and valley views,” often alongside ocean views. The consistency across many listings indicates a very strong building-level feature.
No analysis available
No listings mention city/downtown/cityscape views. The public remarks consistently highlight ocean, mountain, coastline and sunsets but contain no references to city views, so city view is not offered/advertised for this building.
Coastline views are well confirmed for this building. Multiple remarks explicitly reference “coastline views,” “gorgeous coastline,” “coastal scenery,” and “passing ships along the coastline,” showing this is a real and repeated building-level view feature. The evidence is strong and not limited to a single listing.
Garden-style views are supported by both the historical MLS data and the remarks. Several listings mention “lush tropical gardens,” “beautifully landscaped grounds,” “manicured gardens,” and “tropical greenery,” which fits the feature definition. The evidence is moderate but clearly recurring across multiple listings.
Golf course views are supported by multiple remarks, though not as broadly as ocean or mountain views. Several listings explicitly mention 'golf course & sunset views' or views including golf course, while others reference proximity to Makaha Valley Country Club or golf nearby. The evidence suggests this is a real but limited view type available in some units.
No analysis available
Sunrise views are directly supported by multiple remarks, including phrases like “wake up to sunrises over the valley” and “enjoy your morning coffee.” While fewer listings mention sunrise than ocean or mountain views, the explicit references are consistent enough to confirm the feature for some units. The evidence suggests this is a real view orientation available in the building, not an MLS checkbox artifact.
Sunset views are heavily supported across the listings. Remarks repeatedly say “sunset views,” “stunning sunsets,” “ocean sunsets,” and “watch the sun set,” including several units with lanai-facing sunset exposure. The feature appears consistently represented across many agents and listings.
No analysis available
I looked for direct references to fireworks views from the building, such as seeing fireworks from the lanai or unit. The remarks discuss ocean, sunset, mountain, and coastline views, but nothing about fireworks visibility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is supported by both MLS data and multiple remarks: one listing says 'on-site resident manager' and another references 'on-site manager operations.' With 10 of 20 current listings checking RESMAN and prior high confidence, this appears to be a real building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.