Makaha Shores
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Makaha Shores
Building Overview
Makaha Shores in Downtown-Chinatown, built 1967; concrete construction with ocean and mountain views and on-site pool.
About Makaha Shores
Makaha Shores is a residential building located in the Downtown–Chinatown neighborhood. According to available records it was built in 1967 and is constructed of concrete. Unit size and total number of units are not provided in the MLS data.
The building offers ocean, mountain, and sunset views. On-site amenities listed in MLS data include a pool, BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. The building is served by one elevator.
Parking is noted as available, covered, and assigned. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per MLS information. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, rules, fees, and availability with the listing agent or management prior to making any decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy indicators such as percentages, 'majority owner occupied,' or 'highly owner occupied,' but found none. Since the remarks do not provide any owner-occupancy information, the value remains unknown.
Multiple listings mention an elevator in the singular, which aligns with the current value of 1. I did not find any remarks indicating multiple elevators or a different count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV appears to be included in the maintenance fee. Current MLS data shows CABTV in 16 of 19 listings, which is strong and consistent building-level evidence. Public remarks do not explicitly mention cable, but the repeated MLS inclusion suggests this is not a copy-paste anomaly.
Common-area electricity appears to be included. The current MLS data shows OTCOEX in 15 of 19 listings, which is a strong majority. Although the public remarks do not explicitly say 'common area electricity,' the consistent MLS pattern across multiple listings supports inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is uncertain and appears to be the most inconsistent fee item. Only 2 of 19 current listings flag HOTWAT, while 10 of 19 list WTRHTR and several remarks explicitly say 'tankless water heater' or 'sale also includes tankless water heater,' which usually indicates unit-level heating rather than building-supplied hot water. Because the historical signal was previously high, this is not being corrected to false, but confidence is lower than for water or sewer.
Internet inclusion has moderate but not strong support. The current MLS data shows INTSER in 6 of 19 listings, but the public remarks do not confirm internet or wifi service. This suggests the building may include internet in some cases, but the evidence is not as strong as for sewer or water.
No analysis available
Sewer is clearly included in the maintenance fee. The current MLS data is unanimous at 19 of 19 listings showing SEWER. This is strong building-level evidence with no conflicting remarks.
Water is clearly included in the maintenance fee. All 19 current MLS listings show WATER, making this the strongest possible signal. The remarks contain no evidence to the contrary.
BBQ/grilling facilities are well supported for this building. Across the remarks, several listings mention "BBQ area," "evening barbeque," or "BBQ," matching the already-strong MLS pattern that 17 of 19 listings include BBQ in amenities. The repeated wording across multiple listings suggests this is a real shared amenity, not just a copy-paste artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that Makaha Shores offers patio/deck amenity access via lanais. Across the listing set, many remarks explicitly say "private lanai," "165 sq ft private lanai," "enclosed front lanai," and "spacious open lanai," with one listing noting "one of only six units with an enclosed front lanai." The repeated references across multiple listings make this high-confidence and not just a one-off copy-paste claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no meaningful public-remark evidence for a recreation area in this building. Only 1 of 19 MLS listings checks RECARE, and none of the remarks reference a recreation area, recreation deck, or similar shared amenity. This looks more like a likely checkbox error or copy/paste issue than a verified feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks directly confirm dedicated surfboard storage, including a lockable facility for boards up to 10 feet. This is strong evidence that surfboard storage is available.
No analysis available
A trash chute appears plausible based on the MLS pattern, with 10 of 19 listings showing TRACHU. However, none of the public remarks explicitly mention a trash chute, garbage chute, or refuse chute, so this is supported by MLS data more than by descriptive commentary. The evidence is moderate rather than definitive.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building clearly has a swimming pool: current MLS data shows 19/19 listings with pool-related amenities, and public remarks repeatedly reference it as a “heated saltwater pool,” “heated swimming pool,” “heated pool,” or “beautiful pool.” The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listings, so this is not just a checkbox-only artifact.
The pool is repeatedly described as heated in listing remarks, including phrases like “heated saltwater pool,” “heated swimming pool,” and “heated pool” across several listings. While the dedicated pool_features field is blank, the combination of multiple explicit remarks and existing heated-pool amenity flags supports a high-confidence yes.
The pool is directly identified as saltwater in the remarks. This is clear, repeated evidence that the building has a salt water pool.
At least one listing explicitly notes, 'Included is a washer/dryer and dishwasher,' confirming in‑unit laundry exists in some units. Current MLS data (2/15 listings with washer/dryer checked) is consistent with this being a partial‑building feature rather than universal. This is sufficient to treat in‑unit laundry as available in the building for buyers seeking that option.
The evidence is very strong that the building has shared laundry facilities. Multiple current remarks explicitly mention "coin/app laundry," "common laundry," and "community laundry," matching the high-confidence MLS history (18/19 listings with COMLAU). This appears consistent across multiple listings/agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Multiple remarks directly identify the building laundry as paid, using coin/app-operated language. This is strong evidence that community laundry requires payment.
I searched the remarks for explicit floor-by-floor laundry language such as laundry on each floor, laundry room on every floor, or similar wording. The listings mention general community/coin-operated laundry, but nothing indicates laundry facilities on every floor, so this feature is not supported by the public remarks.
Parking is strongly supported across many listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention parking in different forms, including "1 covered parking stall," "one assigned covered parking stall," "one assigned parking stall," and "covered parking." The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents, not just copy-paste checkbox data.
Assigned/reserved parking is clearly supported by the listing remarks. At least several listings explicitly say "assigned parking" or "assigned covered parking stall," and one remarks even specifies a stall number (#17), which is strong evidence of reserved parking. This is consistent across multiple listings and aligns with the current MLS assigned parking data.
Covered parking is supported: multiple listings (at least ~6 of 18 remarks) explicitly mention covered parking or a covered stall ('1 covered parking stall', 'One assigned covered parking stall', 'covered parking #17'). This corroborates the MLS checkbox data showing covered parking on many units, so the building should be listed as offering covered parking.
I searched for explicit deeded/owned parking language such as 'deeded parking,' 'owned stall,' or 'parking included in deed.' The listings consistently describe assigned or covered parking, which supports parking availability but not deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I looked for any parking cost references, including monthly fees, additional charges, or parking rental amounts. The remarks only mention assigned/covered parking and do not provide any separate parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'parking waitlist,' 'parking waiting list,' or instructions to join a parking queue. The listings describe assigned parking directly, with no indication that parking is controlled by a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for card/fob access language like keycard entry, fob access, or electronic access. The listings do mention security, 24-hour security, cameras, and on-site personnel, but nothing indicates a card-based access system.
Security service is very well supported for Makaha Shores. Historical MLS data shows 14/19 listings with SECGUA, and multiple current remarks explicitly mention "24-hour security," "24 hour security," "patrolling security," and "on-site personnel." The consistency across many listings suggests this is a true building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
There is clear evidence of active security patrol/service. Multiple remarks describe 24-hour security with on-site personnel and patrolling security, which meets the feature definition.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least three separate listings/public remarks explicitly mention 'split AC' (agents write phrases like "split AC" and "split system") and current MLS inclusion flags (ACSPL) appear in multiple listings. This is consistent with prior high confidence that some units have ductless/mini-split systems, so the building should be listed as offering split AC for some units.
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS data: 19 of 19 current listings list CONCRE, with historical data also previously showing concrete/reinforced concrete. None of the public remarks contradict this, and the consistency across listings suggests this is a stable building-level attribute rather than agent copy-paste noise.
Mixed evidence: 6 of 17 current listings have DOUWAL checked and prior historical data flagged double-wall (inconsistent across listings). Public remarks do not mention 'double wall' or similar; presence is plausible but unevenly recorded across agents, so included with moderate confidence.
Weak/uncertain evidence for hollow tile: 3/18 current listings show HOLTIL but there is no historical confirmation and none of the public remarks mention hollow tile construction. This appears to be isolated checkbox usage (possible copy/paste error) rather than confirmed building construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Limited and weak evidence: 3 of 17 current MLS listings list SLAB, but there is no historical data or any public-remark mention of a concrete slab foundation. This suggests possible inconsistent checkbox usage by agents; feature included with low confidence pending verification from owner/manager or site visit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I checked for any STR permission language and also for restrictions like '30-day minimum.' The listings explicitly say 30-day minimum rentals are allowed, which means the building does not permit short-term rentals.
I searched for references to hotel pools, hotel rental programs, or hotel-managed operations and found none. Since short-term rentals are not allowed in the building, a hotel rental pool cannot apply here.
I looked for any mention of mandatory participation in a rental pool, along with wording like 'must participate' or 'cannot opt out.' There is no hotel pool language in the remarks, and the building's rental restriction rules it out anyway.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like 'lease expires,' 'ground lease ends,' 'leasehold expiring,' or a 4-digit renewal/expiry year. The remarks do not mention land tenure or any lease expiration date, so the expiry year cannot be extracted.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA-loan approval language and found nothing. Because VA approval must be stated in the remarks to confirm it, this remains unverified and is treated as not indicated in the listing text.
I looked for HOA insurance wording such as fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, and comprehensive building insurance, but none of the remarks mention it. There is no public remark evidence to support this feature.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for fire/life safety evaluation language, including FLSE, fire safety certification, and passed fire inspection, but found nothing. With no evidence in the remarks, this remains unconfirmed and is treated as not indicated by the listings.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are extremely well supported: 19/19 current listings include ocean in the view field, and multiple public remarks explicitly say 'oceanfront,' 'ocean views,' and 'Pacific Ocean.' The language is consistent across many listings and agents, so this appears to be a true building-level feature rather than copy-paste error.
Mountain views are strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks. Fourteen of 19 current listings include mountain-related view descriptions, and several remarks explicitly reference 'Makaha Valley' or 'mountain views,' indicating this is a common offering in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Coastline views are very well supported: 17/19 current listings include coastline in the view field, and remarks repeatedly mention 'shoreline,' 'coastal living,' and 'panoramic coastline views.' The evidence is broad and consistent across listings, supporting this as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
A renovated unit is marketed with 'Views from your lanai are of ocean, sandy beach, mountains, sunrise and more,' directly confirming sunrise visibility from at least part of the building. Together with 2/15 MLS entries coded for SUNRIS, this supports that some units offer sunrise views that buyers may specifically seek out.
Nine current listings (9/18) list sunset views and numerous remarks highlight 'sunset', 'evening barbeque', and 'unobstructed sunset views' from lanais—evidence consistent across multiple listings and agents.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases indicating a view of Friday night fireworks from the units, such as fireworks view, watch fireworks from the lanai, or see fireworks from the building. The remarks discuss ocean, sunset, surf, and mountain views, but there is no evidence of fireworks visibility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historical data indicated the building had an on-site manager (10 of 18 listings with RESMAN). Current public remarks in multiple listings explicitly state 'on-site manager' or 'Onsite manager' and reference 'on-site personnel' and '24-hour security,' supporting that the building maintains a resident/on-site manager; the repeated phrasing across many agent remarks suggests consistent confirmation rather than a single mistaken entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.