Mahi Ko at Waikele
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Mahi Ko at Waikele
Building Overview
Mahi Ko at Waikele in Waipahu: wood-frame building (1993) with split and window air conditioning; assigned and guest parking available.
About Mahi Ko at Waikele
Mahi Ko at Waikele is a residential building located in the Waipahu neighborhood. According to available records, the property was built in 1993 and is constructed with a wood frame. The MLS-derived data does not include unit sizes or counts, so buyers should verify specific unit dimensions and inventory independently.
Key features listed in MLS data include split and window air conditioning options. The building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted, per the provided records. Management company information is listed as unknown in the MLS data.
Parking is noted as available with assigned stalls and guest parking. Buyers should confirm any maintenance fees, association rules, parking stall assignments, and current management details directly with the association or listing agent. This summary is based on MLS data and should be independently verified before purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy percentages or descriptors (e.g., '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied') across the remarks and found none. No current percentage was provided, so owner-occupancy remains unknown based on available public remarks.
I searched the public remarks for terms like 'elevator', 'elevators', 'four elevators', and '4 elevators' (including spelled-out numbers) and found no references. No current numeric value was provided, so the number of elevators remains unknown based solely on these remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
19 of 20 recent MLS listings list OTCOEX (common area electricity) in association_fee_includes. Public remarks do not contradict this and the checkbox is consistently present across agents, indicating strong, building-level inclusion of common area electricity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/20) indicate HOTWAT included, while 14/20 list WTRHTR (in-unit water heater). Public remarks include phrases like 'New ... water heater,' so hot water is supplied by unit heaters and not covered by maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 20 recent MLS listings list SEWER in association_fee_includes. No public remarks contradict this; the evidence is uniform across multiple agents, indicating sewer is included in the maintenance fees.
All 20 recent MLS listings list WATER in association_fee_includes. Public remarks make no claims of separate water billing; the consistent MLS checkbox across agents supports that water is included in HOA fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Building-level patio/deck amenities are well-supported: current MLS checkbox data shows PATDEC/COVPAT in 12/20 listings and historical data showed similar prevalence. In the provided public remarks a majority of units explicitly reference outdoor spaces — e.g., 'covered lanai', 'private fenced yard', 'covered patio' and 'lanai' — indicating that many units offer patios/decks rather than these being isolated or erroneous entries.
Historical MLS data indicated the community amenity (walking/jogging path) with high confidence and 3 of 20 current listings have the amenity checkbox checked. In the provided public remarks one listing explicitly states "Walking/jogging path," and multiple listings reference community parks/amenities, supporting inclusion. While only a single remark explicitly names it here, the combination of prior high confidence and current checkbox/remark evidence indicates the building offers a jogging/walking path.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the listings reference any dedicated surfboard or board storage facilities in the building or common areas. I specifically searched for terms like surfboard storage, board storage, and surf storage and found no matches. Based on this absence across many detailed remarks, the building is inferred not to offer surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks describe a building or resident swimming pool across the provided listings; only one listing states the unit is 'located near a community pool.' Although 10 of 20 MLS listings have the pool amenity box checked, the remarks contain no explicit mention of an on-site or building pool, suggesting checkbox copy/paste errors rather than an actual amenity.
No analysis available
The remarks reference a community pool nearby but never describe it as salt water, saltwater, salt, or saline. I searched for any wording indicating a salt-related pool system and found none, so it is likely there is no designated salt water pool based on the public remarks available.
Multiple current public remarks (at least a dozen listings) explicitly mention in-unit laundry with phrases like "front-load washer and dryer," "in unit washer and dryer," and "in-unit stackable washer/dryer." This confirms historical high-confidence MLS data (19/20 listings) and shows consistent reporting across many agents rather than isolated or ambiguous mentions.
No analysis available
Looked for phrases like coin-op, card-operated, paid laundry, or laundry fee in the remarks and found none. Given the consistent presence of in-unit laundry and no references to paid common machines, paid community laundry is unlikely.
Searched for indications of laundry on each floor or shared laundry rooms but found none. Repeated references to in-unit laundry suggest the building does not rely on community laundry facilities on every floor.
Strong, consistent evidence that the building offers parking: 20 of 20 current MLS listings include parking features and numerous remarks explicitly mention parking stalls and multiple parking options (e.g., '1 assigned parking stalls', '2 parking stalls', 'parking stall located directly in front'). The mentions appear across many agent remarks and align with the MLS checkboxes, indicating building-level parking is available.
High-confidence evidence that assigned/reserved parking is provided: 19 of 20 current MLS listings show the ASSIGN flag and many public remarks explicitly say 'assigned parking stall' or '2 assigned parking stalls', demonstrating assigned parking is a consistent, building-level feature.
No listings (0/20) indicate covered/garage in parking_features and none of the public remarks describe covered parking (garage/carport/covered stall). Evidence across multiple listings consistently describes open/assigned stalls and guest parking but not covered parking.
Listings consistently describe 'assigned' parking and the ability to rent additional stalls, which indicates reserved/stall-assigned parking but not parking owned with the unit. I searched for phrases like 'deeded parking', 'owned parking', and 'parking included in deed' and found none.
No analysis available
Public remarks clearly indicate additional parking stalls are available for rent through the association for a monthly fee. No specific dollar amount is provided in the remarks.
Strong evidence that guest parking is available: 15 of 20 MLS listings include guest parking in checkboxes and many agent remarks explicitly mention 'guest parking', 'visitor stalls', and 'ample guest parking' near units, indicating visitor stalls are a common building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms indicating a parking waitlist and found none. The remarks instead reference assigned stalls, guest parking, and renting extra stalls from the association.
No analysis available
The remarks were scanned for terms like key card access, fob entry, card reader, electronic access, and keycard entry but none were found. With no explicit evidence of a card/fob access system, this feature is assumed not present based on available public remarks.
No analysis available
All provided remarks were reviewed for indications of a security patrol service, including phrases such as security patrol, roving security, and patrol service, but none appeared. In the absence of any such references, it is assumed there is no security patrol based on the current remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least one listing for Mahi Ko at Waikele explicitly advertises 'split A/C in the living room,' matching the 1/20 MLS entries with ACSPL checked. This indicates some units in the building have ductless mini‑split systems and that the building allows them. Even if not widespread, buyers seeking split A/C options would find this relevant.
High historical support (15/20 listings had the ACWIUN inclusion) and multiple current remarks (at least 6 listings) explicitly mention window/room ACs — quotes include “new window A/C,” “window AC unit,” and “living room AC.” Mentions appear across different listings and agents rather than being isolated, so there is strong evidence that some units in the building have window air conditioning units.
No analysis available
Most MLS records still indicate double-wall construction: 17 of 20 current listings include the DOUWAL construction code. None of the supplied public remarks explicitly mention 'double wall' or similar phrasing, so the evidence is primarily the MLS checkbox recorded by multiple agents. Given the strong, repeated MLS coding and no direct contradictory user verification, the building is reported as having double-wall construction (confidence 0.90), though remarks do not independently confirm it.
No analysis available
Only 3 of 20 current MLS records include MASSTU, and none of the public remarks across the 30+ aggregated listings mention 'masonry' or 'stucco' (no phrases like 'masonry', 'stucco', or 'masonry and stucco'). Evidence for masonry/stucco construction is weak and appears limited to a few MLS checkbox entries without corroborating agent remarks.
No analysis available
8 of 20 current MLS listings specify SLAB in construction_materials, and it is unlikely that units in the same townhome complex sit on fundamentally different foundations; the variation likely reflects inconsistent data entry.
No analysis available
Over half of the recent listings (12 of 20) mark wood frame in the construction materials, and no remarks mention an alternate construction type. Although some listings omit the checkbox, the repeated use across many units and agents makes wood frame construction likely for this building.
A minority of current MLS records (4/20 listings) include the ABOGRO code for above-ground construction and historical data listed this feature with high confidence. However, none of the public remarks mention 'above ground' or similar language, so the evidence is limited and implied from MLS checkboxes rather than explicit agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR language and indicators such as 'NUC', 'TVU', '30-day minimum', or 'vacation rental' and found no evidence either way. In absence of explicit STR allowances in the public remarks, STR is marked as not indicated/assumed not allowed for this dataset.
I searched for phrases indicating hotel-managed rental programs and found none. Because STR is not indicated as allowed in the remarks, there is no evidence of participation in a hotel rental pool.
I searched for phrases like 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', and also looked for 'optional' or 'can opt out' language. There is no evidence in the remarks of any rental pool participation—mandatory or optional—so mandatory participation is marked false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'lease expires 2050', 'land lease to 2065', 'leasehold expiring in', and 'renewed through' and found no references to a lease expiry year. Without explicit leasehold language or a year, the lease expiry cannot be determined from these public remarks.
Public remarks repeatedly state the project/unit is VA-approved and refer to assumable VA loan opportunities. This explicit language supports a high-confidence determination that VA financing is accepted.
I searched the public remarks for insurance language like 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', 'full insurance', and similar terms and found no references. With no explicit statement that the HOA provides full/walls-in insurance, I report false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for FLSE/fire & life safety language such as 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', and related phrases and found none. With no explicit mention and no user verification, I default to false with medium confidence (absence in remarks suggests no documented pass).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
1-2 listings mention ocean access/sea views (example: 'peekaboo ocean views'). The ocean view references appear in remarks rather than MLS view checkboxes and are not widespread across agents, so there is moderate but not overwhelming evidence that some units offer ocean views.
No listings mention mountain or mauka/Koolau views; MLS view_descriptions also show 0/20 for mountain. Strong evidence across remarks and MLS indicates the building does not advertise mountain views.
At least 3–4 listings explicitly reference Diamond Head views (e.g., 'stunning views of Diamond Head', 'views straight to Diamond Head', 'enjoying the views of Diamond Head'). Multiple agents mention it in public remarks, providing strong evidence that some units have Diamond Head views.
No listings reference city or downtown views; MLS view_descriptions also show 0/20 for city. There is strong evidence that city views are not an advertised building feature.
Listings do not mention coastline/shoreline terminology; aside from a single 'peekaboo ocean views' mention, there are no explicit coastline/shoreline references. MLS checkboxes show none, so coastline view is not supported.
Numerous public remarks across different listings repeatedly describe private fenced yards and garden-style outdoor spaces (phrases include "private fenced yard," "garden oasis with tropical landscaping," "mature orange, soursop, and lemon trees," and "abundance of fruit trees"). While only 1/20 current MLS view_descriptions explicitly list GARDEN, the consistent, multi-agent remarks indicate the building offers garden-view/private yard units and provide strong evidence that buyers seeking garden views would find relevant units here.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Listings mention breezes and 'morning coffee' but do not explicitly claim sunrise or eastern exposures. With no explicit remarks and MLS showing none, there is strong evidence to mark sunrise views as not advertised.
Public remarks reference breezes and lanai enjoyment but do not explicitly mention sunsets or western exposure. MLS also shows 0/20 for sunset, so evidence does not support including sunset views.
No analysis available
Remarks were searched for terms like fireworks, Friday night shows, or watching fireworks from the lanai or unit, but none were found. In the absence of any mention of fireworks views, it is likely the building does not market or feature this view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple MLS entries (6 of 20 current listings) have the RESMAN amenity checked and at least one listing remark explicitly states 'VA-approved, with an on-site resident manager.' The amenity checkbox appears across several listings (possible copy/paste), and the explicit remark provides direct confirmation that the building has a resident manager on-site.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.