Mahi Ko at Waikele
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Mahi Ko at Waikele
Building Overview
Mahi Ko at Waikele in Waipahu: wood-frame building (1993) with split and window air conditioning; assigned and guest parking available.
About Mahi Ko at Waikele
Mahi Ko at Waikele is a residential building located in the Waipahu neighborhood. According to available records, the property was built in 1993 and is constructed with a wood frame. The MLS-derived data does not include unit sizes or counts, so buyers should verify specific unit dimensions and inventory independently.
Key features listed in MLS data include split and window air conditioning options. The building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted, per the provided records. Management company information is listed as unknown in the MLS data.
Parking is noted as available with assigned stalls and guest parking. Buyers should confirm any maintenance fees, association rules, parking stall assignments, and current management details directly with the association or listing agent. This summary is based on MLS data and should be independently verified before purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The listings show floor 2 most often, and both the county parcel record and state registration report 2 floors. No penthouse or higher-floor evidence contradicts this.
The county records consistently report 228 residential units, and the state registration independently reports 228 units for this building. The parcel is not shared with other building records, so the county count applies directly.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 2813. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
I searched for explicit references such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," and "multiple elevators." None of the public remarks mention elevators, and no current elevator count is provided, so the number is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included in the maintenance fees. The current MLS history shows OTCOEX in 19 of 20 recent listings, which is very strong building-level evidence. Public remarks do not provide any conflicting indication, so this remains a high-confidence feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No provided listing remarks state that hot water is included in the maintenance fee. MLS data is consistent across all 20 listings: 0/20 include HOTWAT, while 15/20 include WTRHTR, making exclusion of fee-included hot water strong and likely building-wide.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Zero of the provided remarks explicitly mention sewer being included, but current MLS data lists SEWER in 20/20 listings. This is unanimous across the available listings and is stronger than the absence of agent wording in remarks.
None of the provided remarks explicitly state that water is included in the maintenance fees. However, WATER appears in 20/20 current MLS records, indicating consistent building-level inclusion across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Zero of 20 listings mention a car wash or related facility. Although 3/20 listings have the CRWSH amenity code, the absence of any supporting remarks across the listings makes this weak, likely copy-pasted MLS data and insufficient to include the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Patio/deck amenities are very strongly supported for Mahi Ko at Waikele. Numerous listings mention a "covered lanai," "covered patio," or private outdoor yard/patio space—well over 15 remarks in this set. The language is consistent across multiple agents, suggesting this is a real building/community feature rather than a copy-paste error.
The feature is confirmed by historical MLS data and explicitly mentioned in the current remarks. At least 1 listing directly says "Walking/jogging path," and nothing suggests it was removed. Because the historical confidence was already high, this is strong evidence the building/community offers a jogging or walking path.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 2 listings explicitly mention storage, using the phrases "small exterior storage closet" and "small outdoor storage container." Combined with storage appearing in 4/20 unit-feature records and 1/20 amenity records, the evidence supports including storage as an available feature, though it may be unit-specific rather than universal.
None of the listings reference any dedicated surfboard or board storage facilities in the building or common areas. I specifically searched for terms like surfboard storage, board storage, and surf storage and found no matches. Based on this absence across many detailed remarks, the building is inferred not to offer surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks describe a building or resident swimming pool across the provided listings; only one listing states the unit is 'located near a community pool.' Although 10 of 20 MLS listings have the pool amenity box checked, the remarks contain no explicit mention of an on-site or building pool, suggesting checkbox copy/paste errors rather than an actual amenity.
No analysis available
The remarks reference a community pool nearby but never describe it as salt water, saltwater, salt, or saline. I searched for any wording indicating a salt-related pool system and found none, so it is likely there is no designated salt water pool based on the public remarks available.
At least 10 listings explicitly mention in-unit laundry or included washer/dryer, including "in unit washer and dryer," "front-load washer and dryer," "new stackable washer and dryer," and "full-size washer and dryer ... located in the unit." The evidence is strong across multiple remarks and is consistent with the current MLS data showing washer/dryer in inclusions for 19 of 20 listings, although one listing notes the included machines are currently not operable.
No analysis available
Looked for phrases like coin-op, card-operated, paid laundry, or laundry fee in the remarks and found none. Given the consistent presence of in-unit laundry and no references to paid common machines, paid community laundry is unlikely.
Searched for indications of laundry on each floor or shared laundry rooms but found none. Repeated references to in-unit laundry suggest the building does not rely on community laundry facilities on every floor.
Parking is strongly and consistently supported across the building. Numerous remarks mention phrases such as "assigned parking stall," "2 parking stalls," "open parking stalls," "ample street parking," and "parking stall located directly in front of the unit," confirming that the building offers parking.
Assigned parking is strongly supported by both MLS data and repeated remarks from multiple listings. Well over 10 listings explicitly reference "assigned parking stall(s)," "1-assigned stall," or "2 assigned stalls," so this appears to be a legitimate building feature rather than isolated copy-paste.
No listings (0/20) indicate covered/garage in parking_features and none of the public remarks describe covered parking (garage/carport/covered stall). Evidence across multiple listings consistently describes open/assigned stalls and guest parking but not covered parking.
Parking is frequently mentioned as assigned or open, including multiple assigned stalls, but there is no public-remarks evidence that the stalls are deeded. This supports false with low confidence because assigned parking may still be governed separately from the deed.
No analysis available
The remarks indicate that an additional parking stall may be rented for a monthly fee. Because no specific monthly charge is stated, the parking-fee amount cannot be determined.
Guest parking is strongly supported across the building, with at least 10 remarks explicitly mentioning guest or visitor parking. Key phrases include "guest parking area," "Visitor stalls are found right across the unit," "ample guest parking," and "lots of guest stalls," providing consistent confirmation from multiple listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings discuss assigned stalls, guest parking, street parking, and possible rental stalls, but do not describe a parking waitlist system. This supports false with low confidence.
No analysis available
The remarks were scanned for terms like key card access, fob entry, card reader, electronic access, and keycard entry but none were found. With no explicit evidence of a card/fob access system, this feature is assumed not present based on available public remarks.
No analysis available
All provided remarks were reviewed for indications of a security patrol service, including phrases such as security patrol, roving security, and patrol service, but none appeared. In the absence of any such references, it is assumed there is no security patrol based on the current remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least one listing for Mahi Ko at Waikele explicitly advertises 'split A/C in the living room,' matching the 1/20 MLS entries with ACSPL checked. This indicates some units in the building have ductless mini‑split systems and that the building allows them. Even if not widespread, buyers seeking split A/C options would find this relevant.
At least 2 listings explicitly confirm window units, including the phrases "new window A/C" and "window AC unit." Several additional remarks mention "new air conditioners," "living room AC," or reduced AC use, while 15/20 current listings include ACWIUN; the evidence is strong and consistent with the historical High-confidence feature.
Six of 20 current listings identify concrete construction through the MLS code CONCRE. None of the supplied remarks explicitly mention concrete or reinforced concrete, so support is moderate and primarily based on MLS data rather than consistent agent descriptions.
Seventeen of 20 current listings contain the DOUWAL construction-material code, providing strong, building-wide support for double-wall construction. No supplied public remarks quote “double wall” or describe two-wall construction, but the repeated MLS entry across many listings appears to confirm the feature.
No analysis available
Only 3 of 20 current MLS records include MASSTU, and none of the public remarks across the 30+ aggregated listings mention 'masonry' or 'stucco' (no phrases like 'masonry', 'stucco', or 'masonry and stucco'). Evidence for masonry/stucco construction is weak and appears limited to a few MLS checkbox entries without corroborating agent remarks.
No analysis available
8 of 20 current MLS listings specify SLAB in construction_materials, and it is unlikely that units in the same townhome complex sit on fundamentally different foundations; the variation likely reflects inconsistent data entry.
No analysis available
Over half of the recent listings (12 of 20) mark wood frame in the construction materials, and no remarks mention an alternate construction type. Although some listings omit the checkbox, the repeated use across many units and agents makes wood frame construction likely for this building.
Above-ground construction appears in a minority of current MLS records: 5 of 20 listings include the ABOGRO code. The supplied public remarks do not explicitly describe above-ground construction or any recent change, so this remains a moderate-confidence building feature based on MLS consistency rather than remark confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks contain no evidence permitting short-term rentals or other transient vacation use. No explicit prohibition such as a 30-day minimum appears either, so false is based on absence of supporting evidence and is medium-low confidence.
The listings provide no evidence of participation in a hotel rental pool. Because short-term rental permission is not established, this feature must also be false.
The remarks do not mention any required hotel rental program or mandatory pool participation. Since short-term rental permission is not established, mandatory hotel-pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for leasehold, ground lease, lease expiration, lease expiry, and renewal language with a four-digit year. No applicable lease-expiry year was mentioned, so the value remains unknown.
Multiple listings directly identify the building or units as VA-approved or offering assumable VA loans. This is strong, repeated building-specific evidence supporting VA financing availability.
I searched for terms such as "fully insured," "full insurance," "fully covered insurance," "comprehensive building insurance," and "walls-in coverage." None of the remarks mention full HOA insurance coverage or explicitly deny it.
No analysis available
I searched for statements including "fire life safety evaluation passed," "FLSE passed," "fire safety certified," "life safety compliant," and "passed fire inspection." No such statements or explicit denials were found, so this remains false with low-to-medium confidence based on the absence of evidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
1-2 listings mention ocean access/sea views (example: 'peekaboo ocean views'). The ocean view references appear in remarks rather than MLS view checkboxes and are not widespread across agents, so there is moderate but not overwhelming evidence that some units offer ocean views.
No listings mention mountain or mauka/Koolau views; MLS view_descriptions also show 0/20 for mountain. Strong evidence across remarks and MLS indicates the building does not advertise mountain views.
At least 3–4 listings explicitly reference Diamond Head views (e.g., 'stunning views of Diamond Head', 'views straight to Diamond Head', 'enjoying the views of Diamond Head'). Multiple agents mention it in public remarks, providing strong evidence that some units have Diamond Head views.
No listings reference city or downtown views; MLS view_descriptions also show 0/20 for city. There is strong evidence that city views are not an advertised building feature.
Listings do not mention coastline/shoreline terminology; aside from a single 'peekaboo ocean views' mention, there are no explicit coastline/shoreline references. MLS checkboxes show none, so coastline view is not supported.
Numerous public remarks across different listings repeatedly describe private fenced yards and garden-style outdoor spaces (phrases include "private fenced yard," "garden oasis with tropical landscaping," "mature orange, soursop, and lemon trees," and "abundance of fruit trees"). While only 1/20 current MLS view_descriptions explicitly list GARDEN, the consistent, multi-agent remarks indicate the building offers garden-view/private yard units and provide strong evidence that buyers seeking garden views would find relevant units here.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Listings mention breezes and 'morning coffee' but do not explicitly claim sunrise or eastern exposures. With no explicit remarks and MLS showing none, there is strong evidence to mark sunrise views as not advertised.
No listings explicitly describe a sunset view, evening sun, or western exposure. A few listings mention "stunning views of Diamond Head," "views of ... almost half the island," or "peekaboo ocean views," but these do not establish sunset views; the limited SUNSET MLS selections appear unsupported by remarks and may reflect checkbox copy-paste.
No analysis available
Remarks were searched for terms like fireworks, Friday night shows, or watching fireworks from the lanai or unit, but none were found. In the absence of any mention of fireworks views, it is likely the building does not market or feature this view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple MLS entries (6 of 20 current listings) have the RESMAN amenity checked and at least one listing remark explicitly states 'VA-approved, with an on-site resident manager.' The amenity checkbox appears across several listings (possible copy/paste), and the explicit remark provides direct confirmation that the building has a resident manager on-site.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.