Mahi Ko at Waikele
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Mahi Ko at Waikele
Building Overview
Mahi Ko at Waikele in Waipahu: wood-frame building (1993) with split and window air conditioning; assigned and guest parking available.
About Mahi Ko at Waikele
Mahi Ko at Waikele is a residential building located in the Waipahu neighborhood. According to available records, the property was built in 1993 and is constructed with a wood frame. The MLS-derived data does not include unit sizes or counts, so buyers should verify specific unit dimensions and inventory independently.
Key features listed in MLS data include split and window air conditioning options. The building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted, per the provided records. Management company information is listed as unknown in the MLS data.
Parking is noted as available with assigned stalls and guest parking. Buyers should confirm any maintenance fees, association rules, parking stall assignments, and current management details directly with the association or listing agent. This summary is based on MLS data and should be independently verified before purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for an owner-occupancy percentage and phrases such as "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied," but found none. The owner-occupancy rate cannot be determined from these public remarks.
I searched the remarks for explicit references such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators," but found none. The building context does not establish an elevator count, so the number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included in the maintenance fees. The current MLS history shows OTCOEX in 19 of 20 recent listings, which is very strong building-level evidence. Public remarks do not provide any conflicting indication, so this remains a high-confidence feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not shown as included in the maintenance fees. The MLS data is consistent at 0/20 listings with HOTWAT, and many listings instead include WTRHTR, which points to individual unit water heaters rather than building-provided hot water. Remarks mentioning a new or included water heater reinforce the absence of HOA-paid hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the provided remarks explicitly state that sewer is included in the fees, although several mention low maintenance fees. The evidence remains exceptionally strong because all 20 current MLS listings list SEWER in association_fee_includes and historical confidence was high.
None of the provided remarks explicitly state that water is included in the fees, although several mention low maintenance fees. The evidence is very strong because all 20 current MLS listings list WATER in association_fee_includes and historical confidence was high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Zero of 20 listings mention a car wash or related facility. Although 3/20 listings have the CRWSH amenity code, the absence of any supporting remarks across the listings makes this weak, likely copy-pasted MLS data and insufficient to include the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Patio/deck amenities are very strongly supported for Mahi Ko at Waikele. Numerous listings mention a "covered lanai," "covered patio," or private outdoor yard/patio space—well over 15 remarks in this set. The language is consistent across multiple agents, suggesting this is a real building/community feature rather than a copy-paste error.
The feature is confirmed by historical MLS data and explicitly mentioned in the current remarks. At least 1 listing directly says "Walking/jogging path," and nothing suggests it was removed. Because the historical confidence was already high, this is strong evidence the building/community offers a jogging or walking path.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the listings reference any dedicated surfboard or board storage facilities in the building or common areas. I specifically searched for terms like surfboard storage, board storage, and surf storage and found no matches. Based on this absence across many detailed remarks, the building is inferred not to offer surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks describe a building or resident swimming pool across the provided listings; only one listing states the unit is 'located near a community pool.' Although 10 of 20 MLS listings have the pool amenity box checked, the remarks contain no explicit mention of an on-site or building pool, suggesting checkbox copy/paste errors rather than an actual amenity.
No analysis available
The remarks reference a community pool nearby but never describe it as salt water, saltwater, salt, or saline. I searched for any wording indicating a salt-related pool system and found none, so it is likely there is no designated salt water pool based on the public remarks available.
At least 10 listings explicitly mention in-unit laundry or included washer/dryer, using phrases such as 'in unit washer and dryer,' 'in-unit stackable washer/dryer,' and 'full-size washer and dryer...located in the unit.' The evidence is strong across multiple distinct listing descriptions and is consistent with the high historical confidence and 19/20 current MLS inclusions.
No analysis available
Looked for phrases like coin-op, card-operated, paid laundry, or laundry fee in the remarks and found none. Given the consistent presence of in-unit laundry and no references to paid common machines, paid community laundry is unlikely.
Searched for indications of laundry on each floor or shared laundry rooms but found none. Repeated references to in-unit laundry suggest the building does not rely on community laundry facilities on every floor.
Strong, consistent evidence that the building offers parking. Across the remarks, numerous listings mention 1, 2, or multiple stalls, including phrases like "2 assigned parking stalls," "1 assigned parking stall," and "2 parking unit." The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the building: 19/20 current listings include ASSIGN, and many independent remarks explicitly describe one or two assigned stalls. Repeated phrases such as "assigned parking stall," "parking stall located right in front," and "2 assigned stalls" provide strong multi-listing confirmation rather than relying only on copied checkbox data.
No listings (0/20) indicate covered/garage in parking_features and none of the public remarks describe covered parking (garage/carport/covered stall). Evidence across multiple listings consistently describes open/assigned stalls and guest parking but not covered parking.
The listings mention assigned, open, guest, and street parking, but do not state that stalls are deeded or included in the unit deed. This supports non-deeded parking, though there is no explicit statement that deeded parking is prohibited.
No analysis available
The remarks establish that an additional parking stall may be rented for a monthly fee. No specific monthly parking charge or amount is stated, so the fee is unknown.
Guest parking is strongly supported: 16/20 current listings include GUEST, and numerous remarks from different listings explicitly mention guest, visitor, or nearby stalls. Key examples include "ample guest parking," "lots of guest stalls," and "visitor stalls are found right across the unit," confirming a building-level amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist and waiting-list language. The remarks discuss assigned stalls, guest parking, street parking, and possible rental stalls, but do not mention a waitlist.
No analysis available
The remarks were scanned for terms like key card access, fob entry, card reader, electronic access, and keycard entry but none were found. With no explicit evidence of a card/fob access system, this feature is assumed not present based on available public remarks.
No analysis available
All provided remarks were reviewed for indications of a security patrol service, including phrases such as security patrol, roving security, and patrol service, but none appeared. In the absence of any such references, it is assumed there is no security patrol based on the current remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least one listing for Mahi Ko at Waikele explicitly advertises 'split A/C in the living room,' matching the 1/20 MLS entries with ACSPL checked. This indicates some units in the building have ductless mini‑split systems and that the building allows them. Even if not widespread, buyers seeking split A/C options would find this relevant.
At least 2 listings explicitly mention a "new window A/C" or "window AC unit," while several others reference living-room AC or new air conditioners. The evidence is consistent with the historically high-confidence feature and the current checkbox appearing in 15/20 listings, indicating window/room AC is offered in the building.
Concrete construction is indicated in 5 of 20 current MLS listings through the CONCRE construction-material code. No public remarks explicitly describe the building as concrete or reinforced concrete, so the evidence is moderate and should be treated as less certain than the double-wall evidence.
Double-wall construction is strongly supported by 17 of 20 current MLS listings containing the DOUWAL code. None of the supplied public remarks explicitly mention double-wall construction, but the high proportion across listings and previously High confidence indicate consistent building-level evidence rather than a single agent entry.
No analysis available
Only 3 of 20 current MLS records include MASSTU, and none of the public remarks across the 30+ aggregated listings mention 'masonry' or 'stucco' (no phrases like 'masonry', 'stucco', or 'masonry and stucco'). Evidence for masonry/stucco construction is weak and appears limited to a few MLS checkbox entries without corroborating agent remarks.
No analysis available
8 of 20 current MLS listings specify SLAB in construction_materials, and it is unlikely that units in the same townhome complex sit on fundamentally different foundations; the variation likely reflects inconsistent data entry.
No analysis available
Over half of the recent listings (12 of 20) mark wood frame in the construction materials, and no remarks mention an alternate construction type. Although some listings omit the checkbox, the repeated use across many units and agents makes wood frame construction likely for this building.
Above-ground construction appears in a minority of current MLS records: 5 of 20 listings include the ABOGRO code. The supplied public remarks do not explicitly describe above-ground construction or any recent change, so this remains a moderate-confidence building feature based on MLS consistency rather than remark confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings describe the properties as residences and investment opportunities but provide no evidence that short-term rentals are permitted. No explicit minimum-stay or owner-occupancy restriction was found either.
I searched for hotel rental pool, hotel rental program, hotel-managed operations, Hilton, Trump, Ritz, and similar terminology. No such references were found; additionally, this feature cannot be true without evidence that STR is allowed.
I searched for mandatory pool, required participation, must be in the rental program, and cannot opt out. None appear in the remarks, and the prerequisite of confirmed STR allowance is not met.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold, ground lease, lease expiration, lease expiry, and renewal language with a specific year. The only lease reference was a tenant lease expiring January 2024, which is not a land-tenure lease and therefore does not apply.
The remarks repeatedly and directly support VA financing availability for the building. This is strong, building-specific evidence from multiple listings.
I searched for terms including "fully insured," "full insurance," "walls-in coverage," "fully covered insurance," and "comprehensive building insurance." None were found in the remarks, so full HOA insurance coverage is not supported by the available listing text.
No analysis available
I searched for statements such as "fire life safety evaluation passed," "FLSE passed," "fire safety certified," "life safety compliant," and "passed fire inspection." No such language appears in the remarks, so there is no public-remark evidence that the evaluation passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
1-2 listings mention ocean access/sea views (example: 'peekaboo ocean views'). The ocean view references appear in remarks rather than MLS view checkboxes and are not widespread across agents, so there is moderate but not overwhelming evidence that some units offer ocean views.
No listings mention mountain or mauka/Koolau views; MLS view_descriptions also show 0/20 for mountain. Strong evidence across remarks and MLS indicates the building does not advertise mountain views.
At least 3–4 listings explicitly reference Diamond Head views (e.g., 'stunning views of Diamond Head', 'views straight to Diamond Head', 'enjoying the views of Diamond Head'). Multiple agents mention it in public remarks, providing strong evidence that some units have Diamond Head views.
No listings reference city or downtown views; MLS view_descriptions also show 0/20 for city. There is strong evidence that city views are not an advertised building feature.
Listings do not mention coastline/shoreline terminology; aside from a single 'peekaboo ocean views' mention, there are no explicit coastline/shoreline references. MLS checkboxes show none, so coastline view is not supported.
Numerous public remarks across different listings repeatedly describe private fenced yards and garden-style outdoor spaces (phrases include "private fenced yard," "garden oasis with tropical landscaping," "mature orange, soursop, and lemon trees," and "abundance of fruit trees"). While only 1/20 current MLS view_descriptions explicitly list GARDEN, the consistent, multi-agent remarks indicate the building offers garden-view/private yard units and provide strong evidence that buyers seeking garden views would find relevant units here.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Listings mention breezes and 'morning coffee' but do not explicitly claim sunrise or eastern exposures. With no explicit remarks and MLS showing none, there is strong evidence to mark sunrise views as not advertised.
No listing explicitly describes a sunset view or western exposure. Remarks mention Diamond Head views, a peekaboo ocean view, and views of much of the island, but not sunsets; the lone SUNSET MLS entry is outweighed by 10/20 NONE entries and the historical lack of explicit sunset evidence.
No analysis available
Remarks were searched for terms like fireworks, Friday night shows, or watching fireworks from the lanai or unit, but none were found. In the absence of any mention of fireworks views, it is likely the building does not market or feature this view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple MLS entries (6 of 20 current listings) have the RESMAN amenity checked and at least one listing remark explicitly states 'VA-approved, with an on-site resident manager.' The amenity checkbox appears across several listings (possible copy/paste), and the explicit remark provides direct confirmation that the building has a resident manager on-site.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.