Mahi Ko at Waikele
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Mahi Ko at Waikele
Building Overview
Mahi Ko at Waikele in Waipahu: wood-frame building (1993) with split and window air conditioning; assigned and guest parking available.
About Mahi Ko at Waikele
Mahi Ko at Waikele is a residential building located in the Waipahu neighborhood. According to available records, the property was built in 1993 and is constructed with a wood frame. The MLS-derived data does not include unit sizes or counts, so buyers should verify specific unit dimensions and inventory independently.
Key features listed in MLS data include split and window air conditioning options. The building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted, per the provided records. Management company information is listed as unknown in the MLS data.
Parking is noted as available with assigned stalls and guest parking. Buyers should confirm any maintenance fees, association rules, parking stall assignments, and current management details directly with the association or listing agent. This summary is based on MLS data and should be independently verified before purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy details such as percentages, 'majority owner occupied,' or 'highly owner occupied,' but none appear in the remarks. Since this is a percentage field and no figure is stated, it remains unknown from the provided text.
I searched the listings for explicit elevator references such as 'elevator,' '4 elevators,' or 'multiple elevators' and found none. Because this is a numeric field and there is no current value provided, I cannot infer a number from the remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included in the maintenance fees. The current MLS history shows OTCOEX in 19 of 20 recent listings, which is very strong building-level evidence. Public remarks do not provide any conflicting indication, so this remains a high-confidence feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not shown as included in the maintenance fees. The MLS data is consistent at 0/20 listings with HOTWAT, and many listings instead include WTRHTR, which points to individual unit water heaters rather than building-provided hot water. Remarks mentioning a new or included water heater reinforce the absence of HOA-paid hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is included in the maintenance fees with exceptionally strong confidence. All 20 recent MLS listings list SEWER in the association fee inclusions, and there are no public remarks suggesting otherwise. This looks like a stable building-level inclusion.
Water is included in the maintenance fees with very high confidence. Every one of the 20 recent MLS listings lists WATER in the association fee inclusions, and the public remarks do not contradict that. This is strong, building-level evidence rather than a copy/paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Patio/deck amenities are very strongly supported for Mahi Ko at Waikele. Numerous listings mention a "covered lanai," "covered patio," or private outdoor yard/patio space—well over 15 remarks in this set. The language is consistent across multiple agents, suggesting this is a real building/community feature rather than a copy-paste error.
The feature is confirmed by historical MLS data and explicitly mentioned in the current remarks. At least 1 listing directly says "Walking/jogging path," and nothing suggests it was removed. Because the historical confidence was already high, this is strong evidence the building/community offers a jogging or walking path.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the listings reference any dedicated surfboard or board storage facilities in the building or common areas. I specifically searched for terms like surfboard storage, board storage, and surf storage and found no matches. Based on this absence across many detailed remarks, the building is inferred not to offer surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks describe a building or resident swimming pool across the provided listings; only one listing states the unit is 'located near a community pool.' Although 10 of 20 MLS listings have the pool amenity box checked, the remarks contain no explicit mention of an on-site or building pool, suggesting checkbox copy/paste errors rather than an actual amenity.
No analysis available
The remarks reference a community pool nearby but never describe it as salt water, saltwater, salt, or saline. I searched for any wording indicating a salt-related pool system and found none, so it is likely there is no designated salt water pool based on the public remarks available.
This feature is strongly supported across the current remarks: many listings explicitly mention in-unit laundry, including 'front-load washer and dryer,' 'in unit washer and dryer,' 'new stackable washer and dryer,' and 'washer and dryer included.' The evidence is consistent across multiple listings/agents and aligns with the very high historical MLS confidence, so this should definitely remain included.
No analysis available
Looked for phrases like coin-op, card-operated, paid laundry, or laundry fee in the remarks and found none. Given the consistent presence of in-unit laundry and no references to paid common machines, paid community laundry is unlikely.
Searched for indications of laundry on each floor or shared laundry rooms but found none. Repeated references to in-unit laundry suggest the building does not rely on community laundry facilities on every floor.
Strong, consistent evidence that the building offers parking. Across the remarks, numerous listings mention 1, 2, or multiple stalls, including phrases like "2 assigned parking stalls," "1 assigned parking stall," and "2 parking unit." The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
High-confidence evidence that assigned/reserved parking is provided. Many listings explicitly say "assigned parking stall(s)," often with details like "right in front" or "conveniently located near the unit." This is repeated across multiple remarks, not just MLS checkbox data.
No listings (0/20) indicate covered/garage in parking_features and none of the public remarks describe covered parking (garage/carport/covered stall). Evidence across multiple listings consistently describes open/assigned stalls and guest parking but not covered parking.
I looked for explicit wording such as deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in the deed, but did not find it. The listings repeatedly describe the stalls as assigned, which indicates use rights rather than deeded ownership.
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly indicate an additional parking stall can be rented from the association for a monthly fee. The exact dollar amount is not provided, but the presence of a parking fee is clearly stated.
Strong evidence that guest parking is available. Several remarks explicitly state "visitor stalls are found right across the unit," "ample guest parking," and "guest and street parking available." The feature is mentioned across many listings, suggesting it is a real building amenity rather than a checkbox artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist, waiting list, and join-the-waitlist language and found nothing. Some remarks mention extra or rentable stalls and guest parking, but none indicate a formal parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
The remarks were scanned for terms like key card access, fob entry, card reader, electronic access, and keycard entry but none were found. With no explicit evidence of a card/fob access system, this feature is assumed not present based on available public remarks.
No analysis available
All provided remarks were reviewed for indications of a security patrol service, including phrases such as security patrol, roving security, and patrol service, but none appeared. In the absence of any such references, it is assumed there is no security patrol based on the current remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least one listing for Mahi Ko at Waikele explicitly advertises 'split A/C in the living room,' matching the 1/20 MLS entries with ACSPL checked. This indicates some units in the building have ductless mini‑split systems and that the building allows them. Even if not widespread, buyers seeking split A/C options would find this relevant.
This feature is strongly supported. At least 4 listings explicitly mention window/room AC or air conditioners, and the historical MLS data already showed high support with 15/20 listings including ACWIUN. The remarks are consistent across multiple listings and do not appear to be a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Double-wall construction is strongly supported by the MLS data: 17 of 20 current listings include the DOUWAL code. None of the supplied public remarks explicitly mention or dispute it, so the evidence points to a stable building-level construction attribute rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Only 3 of 20 current MLS records include MASSTU, and none of the public remarks across the 30+ aggregated listings mention 'masonry' or 'stucco' (no phrases like 'masonry', 'stucco', or 'masonry and stucco'). Evidence for masonry/stucco construction is weak and appears limited to a few MLS checkbox entries without corroborating agent remarks.
No analysis available
8 of 20 current MLS listings specify SLAB in construction_materials, and it is unlikely that units in the same townhome complex sit on fundamentally different foundations; the variation likely reflects inconsistent data entry.
No analysis available
Over half of the recent listings (12 of 20) mark wood frame in the construction materials, and no remarks mention an alternate construction type. Although some listings omit the checkbox, the repeated use across many units and agents makes wood frame construction likely for this building.
Above-ground construction appears in a minority of current MLS records: 5 of 20 listings include the ABOGRO code. The supplied public remarks do not explicitly describe above-ground construction or any recent change, so this remains a moderate-confidence building feature based on MLS consistency rather than remark confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for short-term rental approval language such as STR allowed, legal vacation rental, NUC, or TVU, but found no evidence. There is also no mention of rental policy exceptions or minimum-stay language, so STR allowed is not supported by these remarks.
I searched for hotel pool or hotel-rental program references and found none. Since there is no evidence that STR is allowed, hotel-pool participation is also false.
I looked for mandatory pool language such as required participation, must rent, or cannot opt out, and found nothing. With no indication that STR is allowed, there is also no basis for a mandatory hotel pool, so this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for ground lease, leasehold, lease expiry, renewed through, and lease ends language, but found no specific year. The remarks focus on unit features, parking, and location rather than land tenure details, so the lease expiry remains unknown.
The remarks clearly indicate VA financing is available/used for the project and this unit. Multiple listings explicitly reference VA loan assumption and one states the building is VA-approved. This is strong public-remark evidence for VA eligibility.
I searched for wording like fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance and found nothing. The listings do not provide any evidence that the HOA has full walls-in coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for fire/life safety language including FLSE, passed inspection, fire safety certified, and life-safety compliant, but the remarks do not mention any of these. With no explicit indication in the listings, I treat this as not evidenced from remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
1-2 listings mention ocean access/sea views (example: 'peekaboo ocean views'). The ocean view references appear in remarks rather than MLS view checkboxes and are not widespread across agents, so there is moderate but not overwhelming evidence that some units offer ocean views.
No listings mention mountain or mauka/Koolau views; MLS view_descriptions also show 0/20 for mountain. Strong evidence across remarks and MLS indicates the building does not advertise mountain views.
At least 3–4 listings explicitly reference Diamond Head views (e.g., 'stunning views of Diamond Head', 'views straight to Diamond Head', 'enjoying the views of Diamond Head'). Multiple agents mention it in public remarks, providing strong evidence that some units have Diamond Head views.
No listings reference city or downtown views; MLS view_descriptions also show 0/20 for city. There is strong evidence that city views are not an advertised building feature.
Listings do not mention coastline/shoreline terminology; aside from a single 'peekaboo ocean views' mention, there are no explicit coastline/shoreline references. MLS checkboxes show none, so coastline view is not supported.
Numerous public remarks across different listings repeatedly describe private fenced yards and garden-style outdoor spaces (phrases include "private fenced yard," "garden oasis with tropical landscaping," "mature orange, soursop, and lemon trees," and "abundance of fruit trees"). While only 1/20 current MLS view_descriptions explicitly list GARDEN, the consistent, multi-agent remarks indicate the building offers garden-view/private yard units and provide strong evidence that buyers seeking garden views would find relevant units here.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Listings mention breezes and 'morning coffee' but do not explicitly claim sunrise or eastern exposures. With no explicit remarks and MLS showing none, there is strong evidence to mark sunrise views as not advertised.
Public remarks reference breezes and lanai enjoyment but do not explicitly mention sunsets or western exposure. MLS also shows 0/20 for sunset, so evidence does not support including sunset views.
No analysis available
Remarks were searched for terms like fireworks, Friday night shows, or watching fireworks from the lanai or unit, but none were found. In the absence of any mention of fireworks views, it is likely the building does not market or feature this view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple MLS entries (6 of 20 current listings) have the RESMAN amenity checked and at least one listing remark explicitly states 'VA-approved, with an on-site resident manager.' The amenity checkbox appears across several listings (possible copy/paste), and the explicit remark provides direct confirmation that the building has a resident manager on-site.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.