Liliuokalani Plaza

All 8 MLS records for this building consistently show a construction year of 1968, with no alternative years mentioned. Remarks do not indicate any complete rebuild that would alter the original year built.

Across 8 listings, the highest recorded unit floor is 14, and a penthouse is described as being on the 'top floor'. No remarks or data indicate any higher floors, so the building is inferred to have 14 floors.

No listing remarks or MLS fields provide a total unit count for Liliuokalani Plaza. Because all 8 listings show 0 for NumberOfUnitsTotal and no agent text mentions a unit total, the building’s unit count remains unknown.

The remarks were searched for owner-occupied percentages and phrases such as 'majority owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied.' No evidence was found to confirm or deny the current 50.0% value.

No explicit count such as '4 elevators,' 'four elevators,' or 'multiple elevators' was found in the remarks. The current value of 1 is retained because there is no evidence to confirm or deny it.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Listings reference 'new AC units in each room' for one unit but never suggest centrally provided or fee-included air conditioning. With 0 of 8 MLS entries indicating ACCEN and no remarks about central AC being covered by HOA dues, central AC inclusion can be safely ruled out.

At least 4 listings explicitly mention cable coverage, including "maintenance fee covers water, sewer, and basic cable," "Lower maintenance fee including water, sewer and basic cable," "Maintenance fee includes cable & internet," and "include sewer, water, cable TV, and internet service." This strongly confirms the feature across multiple listings and agents.

No provided public remarks specifically mention common-area electricity, common electric, or building power. However, the feature is consistently selected in current MLS data in 8 of 10 listings, making it likely building-level information despite the lack of independent remark confirmation.

The building is described as 'fee-simple' and as a condo, not a cooperative, and there is no mention of any co-op tax obligations. With MLS also showing COOTAX unchecked across all listings, cooperative taxes are not included in the fees.

Where agents detail what the 'lower maintenance fee' includes, they list water, sewer, cable TV, and internet, but not electricity. Combined with 0 of 8 MLS entries checking ELECTR, this strongly indicates that residents pay their own electric bills separately.

The building and units are described with electric appliances and features (e.g., tankless electric heaters) and no listing refers to gas lines or gas utilities. With no MLS indication of GAS being included, gas is not an HOA-covered utility here.

No listings include HOTWAT in MLS fields and multiple remarks describe in-unit water-heating (e.g., 'tankless electric heaters under all sinks' and WTRHTR in inclusions), strongly indicating hot water is not a building-covered utility included in the maintenance fee.

At least 2-3 listings explicitly mention internet service included with the maintenance fee ('Maintenance fee includes cable & internet' and 'include ... internet service'), and MLS entries list INTSER in multiple records (5 of 9), providing strong corroborating evidence.

All descriptions emphasize proximity to Waikiki Beach, Kuhio Beach, and Kapiolani Park, but never to any marina or boat slips. With MLS also indicating no MARINA inclusion, marina fees or access are not part of the association dues.

Multiple listings use clear language such as "maintenance fee covers water, sewer, and basic cable," "Lower maintenance fee including water, sewer and basic cable," and fees "include sewer, water, cable TV, and internet service." The universal MLS data and repeated explicit remarks provide very strong confirmation.

Several listings explicitly say the maintenance fee covers or includes water, including "maintenance fee covers water, sewer, and basic cable," "including water, sewer and basic cable," and "include sewer, water, cable TV, and internet service." This is consistent across multiple listings and strongly confirms the building-level feature.

None of the listings describe any BBQ area, grills, or outdoor cooking facilities. In a Waikiki condo where such amenities are usually marketed, their complete absence from remarks and MLS checkboxes indicates there is no BBQ amenity.

At least one listing for this building clearly advertises 'bicycle storage' as part of the building’s amenities, grouped with features such as guest parking and secured garage parking. While other listings and the MLS checkbox data do not mention it, this explicit remark provides strong evidence that the building offers bicycle storage.

Remarks highlight proximity to Kuhio Beach and Waikiki attractions but never mention docks, slips, or marina access. Given the urban, non-marina setting and MLS data, it is safe to conclude there is no boat dock amenity.

Parking and garage security are discussed, but there is no reference to a car wash amenity in any remarks. With the relevant MLS amenity never checked, it is very likely that no car wash facility exists on-site.

None of the eight listings mention a clubhouse or similar facility. The consistent absence in both remarks and MLS data strongly indicates that the building does not have a clubhouse.

Across all 8 listings, there are no references to concierge or front-desk services; only a site manager is mentioned. This, combined with MLS data, strongly indicates there is no concierge service in the building.

Several listings emphasize that the building is pet friendly, yet none refer to any on-site dog park or pet exercise area. The lack of both textual and MLS evidence indicates there is no dedicated dog park amenity.

3 of 8 listings highlight a site/on-site manager, yet no listing refers to a doorman or staffed lobby. Given the consistent MLS data and wording, the building appears to be managed but without a doorman service.

Across eight listings, none reference a gym, fitness center, or exercise room, which would typically be highlighted as a key amenity. Combined with all MLS records leaving the exercise-room amenity unchecked, this strongly suggests the building does not offer an exercise room.

None of the eight listings describe any limousine or building car service. Given the nature of this high-end amenity and its total absence from remarks and MLS, the building almost certainly does not offer limo or house-car service.

Agents never describe any on-site meeting or conference room across all listings. With the corresponding MLS amenity also always unchecked, it is very likely the building does not offer a meeting room.

Multiple independent listings describe lanais: 'private lanai offering spectacular city views', 'offers a lanai', 'Spacious lanai on the cooler side of the building', and '90 sq ft lanai'. With 7 of 8 listings mentioning lanais, it is clear this building offers patio/deck-style outdoor space for units. The MLS checkbox underreports this feature, likely due to inconsistent agent data entry.

Agents note proximity to Kuhio Beach, Kapiolani Park, and Waikiki attractions, but never mention an on-site jogging or walking path. Since the amenity is also consistently unchecked in MLS, the building appears not to provide a dedicated jogging path.

Across all eight listings, there is no mention of a playground, kids’ play area, or tot lot. Combined with the absence of this amenity in MLS, this strongly suggests the building does not have a playground.

Across all eight remarks, there are repeated references to lanais but no mention of any private or fenced yards or ground-level yard access. Combined with the building’s high-rise Waikiki context and absence of the PRIYAR amenity in MLS data, this strongly suggests the building does not offer private yard space. Buyers looking specifically for a private yard would not find it here.

None of the remarks reference a putting green or golf practice area. Given that this is a distinctive feature that agents would highlight and it is not checked in MLS, the building almost certainly does not have a putting green.

No listing uses terms like recreation area, amenity deck, or recreation space. This, together with the amenity being unchecked in all MLS records, suggests the building lacks a dedicated recreation area.

Across all listings, there is no reference to any recreation or game room in the building. The absence of both textual mentions and MLS checkmarks indicates there is no shared recreation room.

All references to restaurants are about nearby neighborhood dining, not in-building facilities. The consistent omission in MLS supports that the building does not contain its own restaurant.

Listings highlight lanais and views but never mention any rooftop deck or rooftop access. Given that such features are usually prominently marketed and are absent from MLS amenities, the building likely has no shared rooftop amenity.

Across all listings, there is no hint of a sauna, steam room, or similar wellness facility. Its consistent omission from MLS amenities supports the conclusion that the building does not offer a sauna.

Two listings mention unit-level storage with phrases such as “hallway storage closet” and “large hallway closet/storage,” and 2/10 listings carry the storage unit feature in unit data. The evidence supports storage being available in some units, but it is limited and does not establish separate building-wide storage lockers; one separate mention of “bicycle storage” does not by itself qualify.

Public remarks describe amenities such as bicycle storage, secured entry, on-site/site manager, pet-friendliness, parking, and in-unit laundry, but do not mention any surfboard or board storage facilities. I specifically searched for phrases like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and 'bike and surfboard storage' and found none. In the absence of explicit mention, surfboard storage is assumed not present, though it cannot be ruled out with complete certainty.

Tennis courts are never mentioned in any of the eight listings. Given that tennis facilities are typically emphasized when present and are consistently unchecked in MLS, the building almost certainly does not have tennis courts.

None of the 10 current public remarks explicitly mention a trash chute. However, TRACHU is listed in the amenities for all 10 current listings, consistent with all 9 historical MLS entries, indicating strong cross-listing evidence rather than a recent isolated checkbox change.

None of the listings use terms such as 'valet', 'valet parking', or 'valet service'. Instead, they emphasize self-park options like assigned and guest parking in a secured garage. Given the consistent omission of valet and confirming MLS data, the building very likely does not provide valet service.

Security descriptions focus on secured entry, a secured garage, and video cameras, without any mention of a gated or fenced perimeter. With all MLS entries lacking GATED/WALFEN, it is very likely the property is not enclosed by a wall or fence in the sense of a gated community.

Listings focus on the units, lanais, and location but never mention a hot tub or spa amenity. The lack of such references, along with MLS data, indicates the building does not have a whirlpool or hot tub.

Across 8 listings for Liliuokalani Plaza, no remarks mention a pool, lap pool, or any swimming facility, and MLS amenities show 0/8 with a pool checked. Agents instead emphasize the short distance to Waikiki/Kuhio Beach and other amenities like secured entry, pet-friendliness, and on-site manager. This consistent omission strongly indicates the building does not have a pool.

No listing (0/8) checks any heated-pool-related amenity or mentions a heated pool in remarks. Because there is also strong evidence the building lacks any pool, a heated pool can be confidently ruled out.

None of the listings reference a pool of any kind, and there are no specific mentions of a salt water or saline pool. I searched for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline', and 'salt pool' and found no relevant matches, so this feature is marked as not present based on available remarks.

In-unit laundry is strongly supported by both MLS data and multiple listing remarks. At least 4 listings explicitly mention in-unit laundry or washer/dryer hookups, including "in unit laundry" and "Full-size Samsung washer/dryer in a separate closet," while 8 of 10 current listings include washer/dryer in the inclusions.

Zero out of eight MLS listings mark community laundry as an amenity, and no remarks reference a shared laundry room, coin-op facilities, or laundry on each floor. Instead, multiple listings highlight in-unit laundry, implying that common laundry facilities are not provided or at least are not a building feature agents market. Given this consistent absence, it is highly likely the building does not offer community laundry.

I looked for terms such as 'coin-op', 'coin laundry', 'card-operated', 'paid laundry', or 'laundry fee' and did not find any. Since only in-unit laundry is highlighted and no shared paid facilities are mentioned, it is likely there is no paid community laundry.

I searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', or similar and found none. All references to laundry are for in-unit hookups or in-unit washer/dryers, suggesting there is no community laundry on every floor.

Parking is consistently documented across the building, with all 10 listings carrying parking-related MLS flags and multiple remarks explicitly describing a parking stall, dedicated space, or garage parking. The evidence is strong across several listings and agents rather than relying only on a single checkbox.

Strong evidence across listings that the building provides assigned parking: current MLS shows 8/9 listings with the ASSIGN flag and at least 6 public remarks explicitly mention assigned or dedicated parking (phrases: 'assigned parking', '1 assigned parking', '1 parking stall'). Multiple agents independently advertise assigned stalls, indicating this is a consistent building-level feature rather than copy/paste error.

At least one unit is marketed with 'secured garage parking' and MLS flags confirm the presence of garage/covered stalls on some listings. The building offers covered parking options, even if some stalls may be open.

Multiple listings mention one assigned or dedicated parking space. They do not use deeded-parking language or state that the stall is included in the unit deed.

Across all available listings there is no MLS flagging or remark reference to EV charging. Given how marketable EV amenities are, the lack of any mention strongly suggests the building does not offer EV charging.

The remarks repeatedly mention assigned or dedicated parking but provide no separate parking-fee information. There is no public-remarks evidence of a monthly parking charge.

Limited but explicit evidence that guest parking is available: 1 public remark (penthouse listing) explicitly lists 'guest parking' and the historical dataset previously had high confidence. While most other listings do not mention guest parking (and only 1/9 current MLS entries flag GUEST), the direct statement in the penthouse remark and prior MLS data indicate the building offers guest/visitor parking.

Remarks describing 'secured garage parking' and a SECENT MLS flag indicate that the parking area is access-controlled, likely via garage doors or gates. Buyers can expect some form of secure-entry parking at this building.

Across all unit descriptions there is no indication of tandem or back-to-back parking, which is typically called out when present. The consistent description of single standard stalls suggests the building does not use tandem parking configurations.

None of the listings mention valet or attended parking and no MLS checkbox supports its presence. Given how prominently valet is usually marketed when available, the evidence strongly indicates that the building does not offer valet parking.

The listings describe assigned or dedicated parking and, in one case, guest parking, but do not mention a parking waitlist. No public-remarks evidence indicates that owners must wait for parking.

Security is described in terms of 'secured entry,' 'secured garage parking,' and 'video cameras,' but no remarks reference elevator key/fob access. With ELEVAT unchecked across all 8 listings, there is strong evidence the building does not have keyed elevator security.

Listing remarks indicate general building security (secured entry, video cameras, secured garage) but never specify a card or fob access system. Searched for terms such as key card, keycard, fob, card reader, and electronic access and found none. In the absence of explicit mention, card/fob access is assumed not present.

Across 8 listings, security is described as a 'secured building' with an on-site or site manager but never as having a security guard or 24-hour security. With SECGUA unchecked in all MLS entries and no explicit references to guards, it is very likely the building does not offer guard service.

The security descriptions focus on an on-site/site manager, secured entry, and video cameras, with no indication of a dedicated patrol service. Searched for phrases like security patrol, roving security, and patrolled building and found none. Therefore, a security patrol service is assumed not to be provided.

At least 1 of the 8 listings specifically notes the building is 'Secured with on-site manager & video cameras,' directly confirming video surveillance. Other listings reference 'secured entry,' which is consistent with a building using cameras and controlled access.

0 of 8 listings mark any central AC/HVAC-related options, and no agent remarks reference central air or a building-wide cooling system. Given the consistent reliance on individual AC units and descriptions that emphasize natural breezes instead of central cooling, it is very likely this building does not offer central air conditioning.

0 of 8 listings indicate split AC in the MLS, and no remarks describe ductless or mini-split systems. The only explicit AC reference—'new AC units in each room'—is nonspecific and, combined with the MLS window-AC pattern, supports the conclusion that split systems are not a building feature.

Window/room air conditioning is strongly supported by the MLS checkbox appearing in 9 of 10 listings. One listing explicitly mentions 'new AC units in each room,' while the broad checkbox consistency across multiple listings indicates this is a building-associated feature rather than an isolated agent claim.

Concrete construction is not explicitly mentioned in any of the 10 public remarks. However, all 10 current listings and all 8 historical listings consistently mark the building as CONCRETE in the MLS construction materials field, providing strong evidence across multiple listings rather than an isolated entry.

All MLS entries omit double-wall while unanimously indicating concrete, and nothing in the remarks suggests a wood-frame double-wall structure. This strongly indicates the building is not classified as double-wall construction.

None of the listings (0/8) check hollow tile and there are no remarks about hollow tile walls. The building’s scale and consistent concrete designation support that hollow tile is not a primary construction type here.

The construction_materials field never shows masonry/stucco (0/8) and there is no mention of stucco or masonry in remarks. Agents consistently categorize the structure as concrete rather than masonry-stucco.

MLS data consistently omits steel frame (0/8) while unanimously tagging concrete, and remarks never mention steel framing. This pattern and local building norms indicate the structure is not classified as steel frame.

The slab foundation checkbox is never marked across 8 listings and the remarks are silent about any slab foundation or similar detail. This pattern suggests the building is not represented as having a slab-type foundation in MLS terms.

No analysis available

None of the 8 listings indicate wood frame construction, and all indicate concrete instead. Given the high-rise/mid-rise condo context in Waikiki, wood frame structural construction can be confidently ruled out.

A small minority of listings (2/8) indicate above-ground construction, with no supporting description in the remarks and most agents not checking this option. Given the building type and inconsistent MLS usage, it is unlikely to be properly categorized as above-ground construction.

All 8 listings omit any indication of brick construction, and no remarks reference brick or brick-and-mortar. The building’s location and type make brick construction very unlikely.

No listings indicate single-wall construction and the building type (large Waikiki condo) is fundamentally incompatible with traditional single-wall methods. Single-wall construction can be effectively ruled out.

The remarks mention an investment opportunity and weekend getaways, but these do not establish permission for short-term rentals. No explicit STR authorization or legal vacation-rental designation was found.

The listings contain no references to a hotel rental pool or participation in hotel operations. Because short-term rental permission is not established, hotel-pool participation is false under the prerequisite rule.

The remarks do not describe any hotel rental program, much less a mandatory one. Since short-term rentals and hotel-pool participation are not established, mandatory pool participation is false.

At least two separate listings explicitly market their units as 'fee-simple' or 'fee simple' in Liliuokalani Plaza. No listings mention leasehold terms, so the building clearly contains fee-simple units, even though the MLS land_tenure checkbox is unused.

None of the 8 listings reference leasehold status, lease rent, or a lease expiration, and two explicitly advertise 'fee simple' ownership. Given this consistent pattern and the lack of any LH indicators, it is very likely that there are no leasehold units in this building.

The listings consistently identify the property as fee simple rather than leasehold. No ground lease, lease renewal, or lease-expiration year was found, so the lease expiry is not applicable or unknown.

The remarks were searched for VA approval and VA loan language, but none was found. There is no public-remarks evidence that the building is VA approved.

The remarks mention maintenance fees covering water, sewer, cable, and internet, but do not describe the building's insurance coverage. No explicit denial was found, so this remains an unconfirmed false value based on the absence of qualifying remarks.

Across 8 listings, agents do not check the fire-sprinkler amenity and never mention sprinklers or a sprinkler upgrade in the remarks. This consistent omission indicates the building likely does not have a fire sprinkler system.

The remarks were searched for FLSE, fire/life safety evaluation, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, and passed inspection language. None of those terms or equivalent claims appeared; the references to secured entry and video cameras do not establish FLSE passage.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

At least 2 of the 9 listing remarks mention ocean views: 'some ocean view' and the penthouse noting 'peak-a-boo views of the ocean and sunset.' Historical confidence was High and multiple agent remarks still reference ocean views, indicating the building does offer ocean-view units.

The penthouse remarks clearly mention 'majestic mountain ... views,' and another unit notes a lanai that 'faces mauka to receive cool breezes.' Together with 2 of 8 MLS entries tagging MOUNTA, this shows that some units enjoy direct mountain views. Buyers can reasonably expect mountain-view options in this building.

Remarks repeatedly refer to location on the 'Diamond Head side of Waikiki' but never to an actual Diamond Head view, even where other views are carefully listed (mountain, city, ocean, sunset). MLS view fields likewise have no Diamond Head flag. This consistent omission across agents and units makes it very likely the building does not offer Diamond Head views.

At least 3 of the 9 listing remarks reference city views: 'private lanai offering spectacular city views,' 'city views from your private lanai,' and the penthouse noting 'majestic ... city views.' Multiple independent remarks across listings support that some units have city views.

Remarks reference only 'peak-a-boo views of the ocean' rather than expansive shoreline or coastline vistas. MLS view fields likewise omit COASTL. This supports the conclusion that coastline views are not a feature of this building.

The marketing focuses on urban and distant views (city, mountain, ocean) and interior upgrades, with no references to garden or courtyard outlooks. MLS data also shows no GARDEN view flags. This makes it unlikely that meaningful garden views are a feature of this building.

Agents describe multiple view types (city, mountain, ocean, sunset) but never mention any golf course or fairway. MLS view checkboxes similarly never include GOLCOU. This pattern indicates the building lacks golf course views.

Despite detailed view descriptions in several listings, there is no reference to marina, harbor, or canal views. MLS view data also shows no MARCAN selections. This consistent absence strongly suggests the building does not offer marina/harbor views.

The only directional/light reference is to a 'west-facing top floor unit' with sunset views; no listing highlights sunrise or morning sun. Given the level of detail in other view descriptions, the absence of any sunrise mentions suggests the building is not marketed for sunrise views.

One current listing explicitly states that the west-facing penthouse has "peak-a-boo views of the ocean and sunset," directly confirming the feature. The evidence is concentrated in one detailed listing rather than broadly repeated across agents, while several other listings omit views or state NONE; however, views vary by unit, so the explicit building offering should be retained.

Agents describe many aspects of the surroundings (beach, parks, city, mountain, ocean) but never reference a cemetery. With no MLS CEMETA flags either, it is very likely that no units in the building overlook a cemetery.

Looked for any mention of watching fireworks from the lanai, unit, or building, which is common for Waikiki listings if applicable. Since there are no such references, a fireworks view from the building is considered unlikely based on available remarks.

No analysis available

Multiple agents describe the property as 'pet friendly building', 'pet friendly condo', 'secured pet friendly building (2 pets up to 30 lbs. must be verified)', and 'PET-FRIENDLY'. The repeated, specific mentions across several listings and absence of any 'no pets' language confirm that pets are allowed, likely with some size limits. Buyers with pets should consider this building viable.

At least 4 current listings explicitly mention a building manager, including "on-site manager," "site manager," and "secured with on-site manager." This strongly confirms the historically high-confidence resident manager feature across multiple agents, rather than relying solely on copied MLS checkbox data.

Remarks emphasize 'fee-simple' 2-bedroom and 3-bedroom condos suitable for 'owner occupants and investors' without any reference to hotel operations or rental pools. No listing mentions a hotel front desk, hotel management, or 'condotel', which are standard markers of a condo-hotel. Together with MLS architectural style data, this indicates the building is not operated as a condotel.

Phrases like 'spacious, fee-simple 2 bedroom, 2 bathroom condo' and 'spacious fee simple corner 2/2' confirm fee-simple condominium ownership, which is inconsistent with co-op share-based ownership. No listing uses 'co-op', 'cooperative', or similar terminology. Thus, this building is a standard condo, not a cooperative.