Liliuokalani Plaza

All 8 MLS records for this building consistently show a construction year of 1968, with no alternative years mentioned. Remarks do not indicate any complete rebuild that would alter the original year built.

Across 8 listings, the highest recorded unit floor is 14, and a penthouse is described as being on the 'top floor'. No remarks or data indicate any higher floors, so the building is inferred to have 14 floors.

No listing remarks or MLS fields provide a total unit count for Liliuokalani Plaza. Because all 8 listings show 0 for NumberOfUnitsTotal and no agent text mentions a unit total, the building’s unit count remains unknown.

I searched for explicit phrases like 'owner occupied', '80% owner occupied', or 'majority owner occupied' and found none in the public remarks. Per the rules, the existing 50% value is kept but with low confidence due to lack of corroborating remarks.

Listing remarks mention being "close to elevator" (e.g., "secured garage parking close to elevator"), which confirms at least one elevator exists, but no remark gives a specific number. Current value of 1 is retained per rules. Confidence is low due to no explicit numeric statement in the remarks.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Listings reference 'new AC units in each room' for one unit but never suggest centrally provided or fee-included air conditioning. With 0 of 8 MLS entries indicating ACCEN and no remarks about central AC being covered by HOA dues, central AC inclusion can be safely ruled out.

At least 3 listings explicitly mention cable being covered by the maintenance fee with phrases like 'basic cable' and 'Maintenance fee includes cable & internet.' This is corroborated by MLS checkbox data (8 of 9 listings show CABTV), indicating strong, multi-agent evidence rather than a single copy/paste error.

MLS checkbox data indicates common-area electricity (OTCOEX) is present in most listings (7 of 9), but none of the public remarks explicitly call out 'common area electricity.' This is an implied inclusion based on repeated MLS entries, so confidence is moderate.

The building is described as 'fee-simple' and as a condo, not a cooperative, and there is no mention of any co-op tax obligations. With MLS also showing COOTAX unchecked across all listings, cooperative taxes are not included in the fees.

Where agents detail what the 'lower maintenance fee' includes, they list water, sewer, cable TV, and internet, but not electricity. Combined with 0 of 8 MLS entries checking ELECTR, this strongly indicates that residents pay their own electric bills separately.

The building and units are described with electric appliances and features (e.g., tankless electric heaters) and no listing refers to gas lines or gas utilities. With no MLS indication of GAS being included, gas is not an HOA-covered utility here.

No listings include HOTWAT in MLS fields and multiple remarks describe in-unit water-heating (e.g., 'tankless electric heaters under all sinks' and WTRHTR in inclusions), strongly indicating hot water is not a building-covered utility included in the maintenance fee.

At least 2-3 listings explicitly mention internet service included with the maintenance fee ('Maintenance fee includes cable & internet' and 'include ... internet service'), and MLS entries list INTSER in multiple records (5 of 9), providing strong corroborating evidence.

All descriptions emphasize proximity to Waikiki Beach, Kuhio Beach, and Kapiolani Park, but never to any marina or boat slips. With MLS also indicating no MARINA inclusion, marina fees or access are not part of the association dues.

Sewer is explicitly mentioned in the public remarks ('Lower maintenance fee including water, sewer and basic cable' and other listings) and every MLS record shows SEWER (9 of 9), indicating very strong, consistent evidence that sewer is covered by the HOA fee.

Water is repeatedly and explicitly listed as included in maintenance fees across several listings and is present in all MLS association_fee_includes entries (9 of 9). This consistent multi-listing confirmation yields high confidence that water is included.

None of the listings describe any BBQ area, grills, or outdoor cooking facilities. In a Waikiki condo where such amenities are usually marketed, their complete absence from remarks and MLS checkboxes indicates there is no BBQ amenity.

At least one listing for this building clearly advertises 'bicycle storage' as part of the building’s amenities, grouped with features such as guest parking and secured garage parking. While other listings and the MLS checkbox data do not mention it, this explicit remark provides strong evidence that the building offers bicycle storage.

Remarks highlight proximity to Kuhio Beach and Waikiki attractions but never mention docks, slips, or marina access. Given the urban, non-marina setting and MLS data, it is safe to conclude there is no boat dock amenity.

Parking and garage security are discussed, but there is no reference to a car wash amenity in any remarks. With the relevant MLS amenity never checked, it is very likely that no car wash facility exists on-site.

None of the eight listings mention a clubhouse or similar facility. The consistent absence in both remarks and MLS data strongly indicates that the building does not have a clubhouse.

Across all 8 listings, there are no references to concierge or front-desk services; only a site manager is mentioned. This, combined with MLS data, strongly indicates there is no concierge service in the building.

Several listings emphasize that the building is pet friendly, yet none refer to any on-site dog park or pet exercise area. The lack of both textual and MLS evidence indicates there is no dedicated dog park amenity.

3 of 8 listings highlight a site/on-site manager, yet no listing refers to a doorman or staffed lobby. Given the consistent MLS data and wording, the building appears to be managed but without a doorman service.

Across eight listings, none reference a gym, fitness center, or exercise room, which would typically be highlighted as a key amenity. Combined with all MLS records leaving the exercise-room amenity unchecked, this strongly suggests the building does not offer an exercise room.

None of the eight listings describe any limousine or building car service. Given the nature of this high-end amenity and its total absence from remarks and MLS, the building almost certainly does not offer limo or house-car service.

Agents never describe any on-site meeting or conference room across all listings. With the corresponding MLS amenity also always unchecked, it is very likely the building does not offer a meeting room.

Multiple independent listings describe lanais: 'private lanai offering spectacular city views', 'offers a lanai', 'Spacious lanai on the cooler side of the building', and '90 sq ft lanai'. With 7 of 8 listings mentioning lanais, it is clear this building offers patio/deck-style outdoor space for units. The MLS checkbox underreports this feature, likely due to inconsistent agent data entry.

Agents note proximity to Kuhio Beach, Kapiolani Park, and Waikiki attractions, but never mention an on-site jogging or walking path. Since the amenity is also consistently unchecked in MLS, the building appears not to provide a dedicated jogging path.

Across all eight listings, there is no mention of a playground, kids’ play area, or tot lot. Combined with the absence of this amenity in MLS, this strongly suggests the building does not have a playground.

Across all eight remarks, there are repeated references to lanais but no mention of any private or fenced yards or ground-level yard access. Combined with the building’s high-rise Waikiki context and absence of the PRIYAR amenity in MLS data, this strongly suggests the building does not offer private yard space. Buyers looking specifically for a private yard would not find it here.

None of the remarks reference a putting green or golf practice area. Given that this is a distinctive feature that agents would highlight and it is not checked in MLS, the building almost certainly does not have a putting green.

No listing uses terms like recreation area, amenity deck, or recreation space. This, together with the amenity being unchecked in all MLS records, suggests the building lacks a dedicated recreation area.

Across all listings, there is no reference to any recreation or game room in the building. The absence of both textual mentions and MLS checkmarks indicates there is no shared recreation room.

All references to restaurants are about nearby neighborhood dining, not in-building facilities. The consistent omission in MLS supports that the building does not contain its own restaurant.

Listings highlight lanais and views but never mention any rooftop deck or rooftop access. Given that such features are usually prominently marketed and are absent from MLS amenities, the building likely has no shared rooftop amenity.

Across all listings, there is no hint of a sauna, steam room, or similar wellness facility. Its consistent omission from MLS amenities supports the conclusion that the building does not offer a sauna.

Eight listings for this building do not mention any building storage lockers or separate storage units, and MLS amenity checkboxes for storage are consistently unchecked. The lone 'large hallway closet/storage' remark describes an interior closet, not a building storage area. Given the complete absence of explicit references to shared storage, it is very likely the building does not offer dedicated storage units.

Public remarks describe amenities such as bicycle storage, secured entry, on-site/site manager, pet-friendliness, parking, and in-unit laundry, but do not mention any surfboard or board storage facilities. I specifically searched for phrases like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and 'bike and surfboard storage' and found none. In the absence of explicit mention, surfboard storage is assumed not present, though it cannot be ruled out with complete certainty.

Tennis courts are never mentioned in any of the eight listings. Given that tennis facilities are typically emphasized when present and are consistently unchecked in MLS, the building almost certainly does not have tennis courts.

All 9 MLS entries for this building list 'TRACHU' (trash/garbage chute) in amenities. None of the public remarks explicitly mention the chute, which may indicate agents copy/paste MLS checkboxes, but the unanimous, high-confidence MLS data across multiple listings supports including the feature.

None of the listings use terms such as 'valet', 'valet parking', or 'valet service'. Instead, they emphasize self-park options like assigned and guest parking in a secured garage. Given the consistent omission of valet and confirming MLS data, the building very likely does not provide valet service.

Security descriptions focus on secured entry, a secured garage, and video cameras, without any mention of a gated or fenced perimeter. With all MLS entries lacking GATED/WALFEN, it is very likely the property is not enclosed by a wall or fence in the sense of a gated community.

Listings focus on the units, lanais, and location but never mention a hot tub or spa amenity. The lack of such references, along with MLS data, indicates the building does not have a whirlpool or hot tub.

Across 8 listings for Liliuokalani Plaza, no remarks mention a pool, lap pool, or any swimming facility, and MLS amenities show 0/8 with a pool checked. Agents instead emphasize the short distance to Waikiki/Kuhio Beach and other amenities like secured entry, pet-friendliness, and on-site manager. This consistent omission strongly indicates the building does not have a pool.

No listing (0/8) checks any heated-pool-related amenity or mentions a heated pool in remarks. Because there is also strong evidence the building lacks any pool, a heated pool can be confidently ruled out.

None of the listings reference a pool of any kind, and there are no specific mentions of a salt water or saline pool. I searched for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline', and 'salt pool' and found no relevant matches, so this feature is marked as not present based on available remarks.

Building-level in-unit laundry is well-supported: historical MLS data indicated 7 of 9 listings included washer/dryer, and current remarks on at least four separate listings explicitly state in-unit laundry (quotes: 'washer and dryer hookups located within the unit', 'in unit laundry', 'Full-size Samsung washer/dryer in a separate closet', 'washer/dryer in unit'). Evidence is strong and comes from multiple listings/agents, so the building should be marked as offering laundry in unit for some units.

Zero out of eight MLS listings mark community laundry as an amenity, and no remarks reference a shared laundry room, coin-op facilities, or laundry on each floor. Instead, multiple listings highlight in-unit laundry, implying that common laundry facilities are not provided or at least are not a building feature agents market. Given this consistent absence, it is highly likely the building does not offer community laundry.

I looked for terms such as 'coin-op', 'coin laundry', 'card-operated', 'paid laundry', or 'laundry fee' and did not find any. Since only in-unit laundry is highlighted and no shared paid facilities are mentioned, it is likely there is no paid community laundry.

I searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', or similar and found none. All references to laundry are for in-unit hookups or in-unit washer/dryers, suggesting there is no community laundry on every floor.

Parking is consistently documented: MLS parking_features are set on all 9 listings and at least 8 separate public-remarks entries explicitly mention parking (e.g., "1 parking stall", "assigned parking", "1 assigned parking", "one dedicated parking space", "guest parking", "secured garage parking"). Evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents and listings, matching the historical high-confidence data.

Strong evidence across listings that the building provides assigned parking: current MLS shows 8/9 listings with the ASSIGN flag and at least 6 public remarks explicitly mention assigned or dedicated parking (phrases: 'assigned parking', '1 assigned parking', '1 parking stall'). Multiple agents independently advertise assigned stalls, indicating this is a consistent building-level feature rather than copy/paste error.

At least one unit is marketed with 'secured garage parking' and MLS flags confirm the presence of garage/covered stalls on some listings. The building offers covered parking options, even if some stalls may be open.

Searched for wording like 'deeded parking', 'owned stall', or 'parking included in the deed' and found none. Because listings describe assigned/allocated parking but do not say it is deeded, set to false with low confidence.

Across all available listings there is no MLS flagging or remark reference to EV charging. Given how marketable EV amenities are, the lack of any mention strongly suggests the building does not offer EV charging.

Looked for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking charge', or similar phrases; none found. No monthly parking amount can be determined from remarks, so value is null with low confidence.

Limited but explicit evidence that guest parking is available: 1 public remark (penthouse listing) explicitly lists 'guest parking' and the historical dataset previously had high confidence. While most other listings do not mention guest parking (and only 1/9 current MLS entries flag GUEST), the direct statement in the penthouse remark and prior MLS data indicate the building offers guest/visitor parking.

Remarks describing 'secured garage parking' and a SECENT MLS flag indicate that the parking area is access-controlled, likely via garage doors or gates. Buyers can expect some form of secure-entry parking at this building.

Across all unit descriptions there is no indication of tandem or back-to-back parking, which is typically called out when present. The consistent description of single standard stalls suggests the building does not use tandem parking configurations.

None of the listings mention valet or attended parking and no MLS checkbox supports its presence. Given how prominently valet is usually marketed when available, the evidence strongly indicates that the building does not offer valet parking.

Searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list for parking', or instructions to join a list; none were found. Set to false with low confidence due to absence of any references.

Security is described in terms of 'secured entry,' 'secured garage parking,' and 'video cameras,' but no remarks reference elevator key/fob access. With ELEVAT unchecked across all 8 listings, there is strong evidence the building does not have keyed elevator security.

Listing remarks indicate general building security (secured entry, video cameras, secured garage) but never specify a card or fob access system. Searched for terms such as key card, keycard, fob, card reader, and electronic access and found none. In the absence of explicit mention, card/fob access is assumed not present.

Across 8 listings, security is described as a 'secured building' with an on-site or site manager but never as having a security guard or 24-hour security. With SECGUA unchecked in all MLS entries and no explicit references to guards, it is very likely the building does not offer guard service.

The security descriptions focus on an on-site/site manager, secured entry, and video cameras, with no indication of a dedicated patrol service. Searched for phrases like security patrol, roving security, and patrolled building and found none. Therefore, a security patrol service is assumed not to be provided.

At least 1 of the 8 listings specifically notes the building is 'Secured with on-site manager & video cameras,' directly confirming video surveillance. Other listings reference 'secured entry,' which is consistent with a building using cameras and controlled access.

0 of 8 listings mark any central AC/HVAC-related options, and no agent remarks reference central air or a building-wide cooling system. Given the consistent reliance on individual AC units and descriptions that emphasize natural breezes instead of central cooling, it is very likely this building does not offer central air conditioning.

0 of 8 listings indicate split AC in the MLS, and no remarks describe ductless or mini-split systems. The only explicit AC reference—'new AC units in each room'—is nonspecific and, combined with the MLS window-AC pattern, supports the conclusion that split systems are not a building feature.

Most listings (8 of 9) explicitly include the ACWIUN checkbox in MLS. One remark explicitly states 'new AC units in each room' for a penthouse, and several other remarks reference cool island breezes and 'refreshing trade winds' but do not contradict the presence of unit AC. Evidence is strong across multiple agent listings and the MLS checkbox consistency supports including window_ac=true for the building.

All 9 current MLS listings (and 8 of 8 historically) mark the building as CONCRETE in construction_materials. None of the public remarks explicitly say 'concrete' or 'reinforced concrete', but the consistent, unanimous MLS checkbox across multiple listings and prior high-confidence data make concrete construction highly likely.

All MLS entries omit double-wall while unanimously indicating concrete, and nothing in the remarks suggests a wood-frame double-wall structure. This strongly indicates the building is not classified as double-wall construction.

None of the listings (0/8) check hollow tile and there are no remarks about hollow tile walls. The building’s scale and consistent concrete designation support that hollow tile is not a primary construction type here.

The construction_materials field never shows masonry/stucco (0/8) and there is no mention of stucco or masonry in remarks. Agents consistently categorize the structure as concrete rather than masonry-stucco.

MLS data consistently omits steel frame (0/8) while unanimously tagging concrete, and remarks never mention steel framing. This pattern and local building norms indicate the structure is not classified as steel frame.

The slab foundation checkbox is never marked across 8 listings and the remarks are silent about any slab foundation or similar detail. This pattern suggests the building is not represented as having a slab-type foundation in MLS terms.

No analysis available

None of the 8 listings indicate wood frame construction, and all indicate concrete instead. Given the high-rise/mid-rise condo context in Waikiki, wood frame structural construction can be confidently ruled out.

A small minority of listings (2/8) indicate above-ground construction, with no supporting description in the remarks and most agents not checking this option. Given the building type and inconsistent MLS usage, it is unlikely to be properly categorized as above-ground construction.

All 8 listings omit any indication of brick construction, and no remarks reference brick or brick-and-mortar. The building’s location and type make brick construction very unlikely.

No listings indicate single-wall construction and the building type (large Waikiki condo) is fundamentally incompatible with traditional single-wall methods. Single-wall construction can be effectively ruled out.

Searched the remarks for 'short-term rental', 'vacation rental', 'NUC', 'TVU', '30-day minimum', and related terms; none were found. In absence of explicit allowance, set to false with low confidence.

Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel program', or management by a hotel brand; none were found. Because STR is not indicated as allowed, this is false.

Looked for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'cannot opt out' language and found none. Since STR is not indicated as allowed, mandatory participation is false.

At least two separate listings explicitly market their units as 'fee-simple' or 'fee simple' in Liliuokalani Plaza. No listings mention leasehold terms, so the building clearly contains fee-simple units, even though the MLS land_tenure checkbox is unused.

None of the 8 listings reference leasehold status, lease rent, or a lease expiration, and two explicitly advertise 'fee simple' ownership. Given this consistent pattern and the lack of any LH indicators, it is very likely that there are no leasehold units in this building.

Remarks explicitly state the condo is fee-simple, indicating no ground lease applies. Therefore lease expiry year is not applicable and returned as null with high confidence.

Searched all remarks for 'VA', 'VA approved', 'VA financing', and similar terms; none were found. In absence of any explicit indication that VA loans are accepted, set to false with low confidence.

I searched the remarks for terms indicating HOA provides full/building (walls-in) insurance and found none. Because there's no explicit statement and no current verified value, the field is set to false with medium-low confidence.

Across 8 listings, agents do not check the fire-sprinkler amenity and never mention sprinklers or a sprinkler upgrade in the remarks. This consistent omission indicates the building likely does not have a fire sprinkler system.

I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'fire life safety evaluation', 'FLSE passed', 'passed fire inspection', and 'fire safety certified' and found no references. With no mention and no existing confirmed value, the field is set to false with medium-low confidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

At least 2 of the 9 listing remarks mention ocean views: 'some ocean view' and the penthouse noting 'peak-a-boo views of the ocean and sunset.' Historical confidence was High and multiple agent remarks still reference ocean views, indicating the building does offer ocean-view units.

The penthouse remarks clearly mention 'majestic mountain ... views,' and another unit notes a lanai that 'faces mauka to receive cool breezes.' Together with 2 of 8 MLS entries tagging MOUNTA, this shows that some units enjoy direct mountain views. Buyers can reasonably expect mountain-view options in this building.

Remarks repeatedly refer to location on the 'Diamond Head side of Waikiki' but never to an actual Diamond Head view, even where other views are carefully listed (mountain, city, ocean, sunset). MLS view fields likewise have no Diamond Head flag. This consistent omission across agents and units makes it very likely the building does not offer Diamond Head views.

At least 3 of the 9 listing remarks reference city views: 'private lanai offering spectacular city views,' 'city views from your private lanai,' and the penthouse noting 'majestic ... city views.' Multiple independent remarks across listings support that some units have city views.

Remarks reference only 'peak-a-boo views of the ocean' rather than expansive shoreline or coastline vistas. MLS view fields likewise omit COASTL. This supports the conclusion that coastline views are not a feature of this building.

The marketing focuses on urban and distant views (city, mountain, ocean) and interior upgrades, with no references to garden or courtyard outlooks. MLS data also shows no GARDEN view flags. This makes it unlikely that meaningful garden views are a feature of this building.

Agents describe multiple view types (city, mountain, ocean, sunset) but never mention any golf course or fairway. MLS view checkboxes similarly never include GOLCOU. This pattern indicates the building lacks golf course views.

Despite detailed view descriptions in several listings, there is no reference to marina, harbor, or canal views. MLS view data also shows no MARCAN selections. This consistent absence strongly suggests the building does not offer marina/harbor views.

The only directional/light reference is to a 'west-facing top floor unit' with sunset views; no listing highlights sunrise or morning sun. Given the level of detail in other view descriptions, the absence of any sunrise mentions suggests the building is not marketed for sunrise views.

A top-floor west-facing unit explicitly advertises 'peak-a-boo views of the ocean and sunset,' directly tying the building to sunset viewing. The SUNSET flag in one MLS record corroborates this. Buyers can reasonably expect at least some sunset-view units in Liliuokalani Plaza.

Agents describe many aspects of the surroundings (beach, parks, city, mountain, ocean) but never reference a cemetery. With no MLS CEMETA flags either, it is very likely that no units in the building overlook a cemetery.

Looked for any mention of watching fireworks from the lanai, unit, or building, which is common for Waikiki listings if applicable. Since there are no such references, a fireworks view from the building is considered unlikely based on available remarks.

No analysis available

Multiple agents describe the property as 'pet friendly building', 'pet friendly condo', 'secured pet friendly building (2 pets up to 30 lbs. must be verified)', and 'PET-FRIENDLY'. The repeated, specific mentions across several listings and absence of any 'no pets' language confirm that pets are allowed, likely with some size limits. Buyers with pets should consider this building viable.

All 8 MLS entries mark a resident manager amenity, and remarks explicitly note a 'site manager' and 'on-site manager'. This consistent evidence from multiple listings supports that Liliuokalani Plaza has a resident/on-site manager.

Remarks emphasize 'fee-simple' 2-bedroom and 3-bedroom condos suitable for 'owner occupants and investors' without any reference to hotel operations or rental pools. No listing mentions a hotel front desk, hotel management, or 'condotel', which are standard markers of a condo-hotel. Together with MLS architectural style data, this indicates the building is not operated as a condotel.

Phrases like 'spacious, fee-simple 2 bedroom, 2 bathroom condo' and 'spacious fee simple corner 2/2' confirm fee-simple condominium ownership, which is inconsistent with co-op share-based ownership. No listing uses 'co-op', 'cooperative', or similar terminology. Thus, this building is a standard condo, not a cooperative.