Liliuokalani Gardens

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

I searched for direct owner-occupancy statements like '80% owner occupied,' 'majority owner occupied,' or similar phrasing and found none. One remark suggests a mix of long-term tenants and owners, but that does not provide a usable percentage, so the current value of 28% is kept with low confidence.

I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator counts such as '2 elevators' or 'multiple elevators' and found none. The listings do confirm the building has elevators, but they do not state how many, so the current value of 2 is retained with low confidence.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Central A/C inclusion is one of the clearest confirmed features. The MLS shows ACCEN in 16 of 20 listings, and several remarks explicitly say "central AC, already covered in the maintenance fee" or similar wording. This is repeated across multiple agents and unit types, making it highly reliable.

Cable inclusion is very well supported. At least 16 of 20 MLS listings show CABTV, and multiple remarks explicitly state phrases like "HOA includes cable" and "maintenance fees include ... basic cable." The pattern is consistent across many listings and appears to be building-level rather than agent-specific noise.

There is moderate evidence that common-area expenses are included, but the public remarks do not explicitly mention common electricity or building power. The MLS data shows OTCOEX in 12 of 20 listings, which suggests a real building-level inclusion, though the remarks read more like copy-paste amenity descriptions than direct confirmation.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

Hot water inclusion is strongly supported. The MLS shows HOTWAT in 15 of 20 records and no WTRHTR conflicts, while multiple listings state "maintenance fee includes hot water" or "HOA fee includes ... hot water." This is consistent across the building and appears trustworthy.

Internet inclusion is well supported. The MLS lists INTSER in 13 of 20 records, and several remarks directly say "HOA fee includes internet" or "maintenance fees include ... internet." The consistency across listings makes this a reliable building feature.

No analysis available

Sewer inclusion is exceptionally well supported. The MLS shows SEWER in 19 of 20 listings, and numerous remarks mention fees including "water, sewer and hot water." This is one of the most consistent features in the dataset.

Water inclusion is strongly and repeatedly confirmed. The MLS shows WATER in 18 of 20 listings, and many remarks explicitly state that HOA or maintenance fees include water. The evidence is broad and consistent across agents and unit types.

BBQ facilities are consistently and explicitly described across the listings. Dozens of remarks mention phrases like "BBQ areas," "BBQ grills," "BBQ pavilions," "barbecue and picnic area," and "full kitchen & BBQ area," indicating this is a shared building amenity rather than copy-paste noise. The evidence is overwhelming and aligns with the current MLS data showing 20/20 listings include BBQ.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

Clubhouse/community space is supported by repeated remarks. Listings cite “clubhouse,” “party room,” “recreation room,” “meeting room,” and “recreation area,” aligning with the 16/20 MLS history. This looks like a real shared amenity rather than an isolated or mistaken checkbox.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

There is no meaningful remark evidence for an exercise room or fitness center in the listing remarks. Because the current MLS data shows only 1 of 20 listings checking the feature, this appears to be an isolated or erroneous checkbox rather than a building-wide amenity.

No analysis available

Meeting-room evidence is moderate rather than overwhelming, but it is present. A few listings explicitly say “meeting room,” “community room,” or “open-air meeting areas,” while many others do not mention it. This suggests the feature exists in the building, but it is not as consistently advertised as BBQ or tennis.

Strong building-level evidence that Liliuokalani Gardens offers patio/deck-style outdoor amenities. Across many listings, agents mention shared outdoor areas like an "upper patio area," "rooftop sundeck," "pool pavilion," and a private roof deck in penthouse units, indicating the building has accessible outdoor space options. The consistency across many remarks suggests this is not a one-off copy-paste error.

Walking/jogging path amenity is well supported. Numerous remarks describe “walking paths,” “scenic garden paths,” and “walking/jogging paths,” often tied to the koi ponds and landscaped grounds. The repeated references across many listings make this a reliable building feature.

No analysis available

Moderately strong evidence that some units have private yard-like outdoor space: at least 2–3 listings explicitly advertise unit-level private rooftop outdoor areas ('private 450 square foot rooftop lanai', 'private rooftop deck' / 'private roof top deck'), and several other listings note personal gardening areas or private lanai access for penthouse units. The feature appears limited to select units (penthouses), but is confirmed in multiple agent remarks, so include as available at the building level.

No analysis available

Recreation area is supported by multiple listing remarks, though not as universally as BBQ or tennis. Specific language includes "recreation area" and "pool with recreation area," indicating a shared amenity space within the building.

Multiple listings (10+) explicitly mention indoor shared spaces using terms like "recreation room", "rec room", "party room", "meeting room" or "recreation area." Though historically medium, the present remarks consistently describe common recreation/meeting space available to residents.

Across dozens of remarks, agents describe proximity to Waikiki restaurants but never an in-building restaurant, café, or on-site dining service. Given this and just a single MLS checkbox, the RESTAU entry is almost certainly a data error and the building does not have its own restaurant.

No analysis available

Limited/low-frequency evidence: only ~3 of 20 listings (per MLS summary) mention 'sauna' and a few remarks explicitly list 'sauna' or 'spa/sauna'. This suggests a possible building amenity but with limited corroboration across agents—moderate/low confidence.

Storage units/lockers are strongly supported across the building. Numerous listings mention 'secure surfboard and bike storage,' 'optional storage locker,' 'large storage closet,' and 'extra storage possible to obtain,' showing both building-level storage and unit-level storage features. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and is not limited to one remark.

Surfboard storage is very clearly supported by the remarks. It is mentioned repeatedly and often in secured-storage terms, making this one of the most certain features in the dataset.

Tennis facilities are clearly present and widely advertised throughout the building remarks. Multiple listings reference "tennis courts," "rooftop tennis courts," "lighted rooftop tennis/pickleball courts," and "two tennis courts," which is strong consistent evidence across agents. This aligns with the current MLS data showing 18/20 listings include TENCOU.

Trash chute is supported primarily by the MLS history, with current data showing 19/20 listings include TRACHU. At least one remark explicitly says "Trash chute," and there is no meaningful contradictory evidence in the current remarks. This looks like a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Whirlpool/spa/hot-tub amenities are repeatedly referenced in the public remarks. Listings use direct terms such as "whirlpool," "jacuzzi," "hot tub," and "spa," often alongside the pool and tennis amenities, showing this is a shared building feature. The current MLS data and remarks are consistent, supporting a high-confidence true value.

Pool is consistently confirmed across the public remarks for this building, with many listings describing it as a "swimming pool," "large pool," "sparkling pool," or even "Waikiki’s largest residential pool." The evidence is strong across many agents and appears repeatedly rather than as a one-off copy-paste error, so this feature should remain included.

A heated pool is explicitly mentioned in one listing as a "heated pool," while MLS data shows HEAPOO in 2 of 20 listings. The evidence is weaker than for the general pool feature and may reflect inconsistent agent input, but there is enough direct language to support inclusion.

I searched the remarks for explicit salt-water pool wording such as 'salt water pool,' 'saltwater pool,' 'saline pool,' and 'salt pool.' The listings repeatedly mention a pool, jacuzzi, spa, and pool amenities, but none identify the pool as salt water, so this feature is not supported by the public remarks.

Strong evidence that some units in Liliuokalani Gardens have in-unit laundry. At least several listings explicitly mention "washer and dryer in the unit," "in-unit washer and dryer," and "stack washer and dryer," while historical MLS data also shows washer/dryer inclusions on 3/20 listings. This appears to be a real unit-level feature, not just copy-paste checkbox noise.

There is very strong evidence that the building has shared/community laundry facilities. Many current remarks explicitly reference coin-operated laundry, community laundry, laundry rooms, or laundry on the main floor/ground floor, and historical MLS data shows COMLAU in 15/20 listings. This is consistent across multiple listings and agents, so it should be treated as a building amenity.

There is strong direct evidence that the community laundry is paid. Multiple listings mention coin-operated laundry and mobile pay, which clearly indicates a fee-based laundry setup. This is confirmed in several remarks across the building.

I searched for explicit wording like laundry on every floor, floor-by-floor laundry, or laundry rooms on each level. The public remarks consistently place laundry on the main floor, ground floor, lobby, or as shared laundry rooms, which supports community laundry being available but not on every floor.

Parking is strongly supported by both current MLS data and the public remarks. Multiple listings mention assigned stalls, lease/rent parking, guest parking, and garage access, while none of the current MLS records show NONE. This appears to be consistent building-level parking availability rather than isolated copy-paste noise.

Assigned parking is strongly confirmed across the listing remarks, with well over a dozen references. Examples include "1 assigned parking stall," "secured garage parking stall is assigned," "parking stall is guaranteed," and "covered assigned parking," often paired with an annual fee of $280-$300. The repeated wording across many listings and agents shows this is a building-level offering, not a one-off unit note.

Covered parking is heavily documented in the remarks, including phrases such as 'secured covered parking,' 'secured garage parking stall,' 'covered assigned parking,' and 'secure covered parking.' The feature appears across many listings and towers, indicating it is a building-level amenity rather than a one-off unit feature. Historical data also shows very high prevalence, reinforcing confidence.

I looked for deeded/owned parking language such as deeded stall, owned stall, or parking included in deed, but the remarks consistently describe parking as rented or leased. That supports false for deeded parking.

No analysis available

I searched the public remarks for an explicit monthly parking charge, parking rental, or additional parking cost. The remarks consistently give annual parking fees instead of monthly ones, most often $300/year (with a few older $280/year mentions), so I converted the repeated $300/year rate to a monthly equivalent of about $25. This is based entirely on public remarks and reflects the parking fee when not included.

Guest parking is repeatedly mentioned in the public remarks, including 'guest parking,' 'abundant guest parking,' and 'lots of guest parking stalls inside the secured garage structure.' This appears across many listings and different agents, so it is not likely a copy-paste anomaly. The building clearly offers guest parking.

Secured parking/entry is supported by many remarks describing 'secured garage,' 'gated entries,' 'key fob access to the entry, elevators, and parking garage,' and 'secured pkg entry.' The language is consistent across listings and reflects both secure parking access and building security features. This is strong building-level evidence for secured-entry parking.

No analysis available

No analysis available

There is explicit public-remarks evidence of a parking waitlist system. Multiple listings describe additional stalls potentially being available via waitlist, so this is true.

No analysis available

The building clearly has card/fob-based access control. Multiple listings mention secured entry, key fob access, and fob-required elevator/garage access, which is strong public-remarks evidence.

Security guard service is very strongly supported for this building. Across many recent listings, agents consistently describe "24/7 security" / "24-hour security," and some explicitly mention a "security guard" or "security guard team," which aligns with the MLS amenity checkbox. The evidence appears strong and repeated across multiple agents, not just isolated copy-paste.

There is strong evidence of active security coverage and patrol-like service. While many remarks say 24/7 security or security guard, some explicitly use roaming/roving security wording, supporting a patrol-style security service.

No analysis available

Central AC is strongly confirmed for Liliuokalani Gardens. I found explicit mentions in dozens of remarks across many listings, including phrases like "central AC," "Central A/C," and "central air," often noting it is included in maintenance fees. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and unit types, so this is not just a copy-paste checkbox issue.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Construction appears to be concrete at the building level. The current MLS checkbox is very consistent across listings, with 17 of 20 marking CONCRE, and none of the public remarks provide evidence of a change away from concrete. This looks like stable building-level data rather than copy-paste noise.

High confidence the building is not double‑wall: only 4 of 20 MLS records check 'DOUWAL', while numerous listings describe a mid‑1980s 24‑story concrete twin‑tower. No public remarks mention 'double wall' and the small number of MLS checks appears inconsistent with the building type, suggesting agent checkbox mistakes.

No analysis available

Moderate MLS checkbox evidence: 6 of 20 current listings indicate 'masonry/stucco' and historical data flagged this as medium confidence. However, public remarks across the listings include 0 mentions of 'masonry' or 'stucco', so the evidence is weak and appears to stem mainly from MLS checkbox entries rather than explicit agent descriptions.

Historical records rated steel-frame construction with high confidence and 3 of 20 current MLS listings have STEFRA checked. Public remarks (dozens of listings) contain 0 mentions of 'steel frame' or related phrases, suggesting agents did not describe it in remarks; evidence relies on prior/higher-confidence dataset and a few MLS checkboxes rather than explicit agent statements.

Prior datasets indicated slab foundation with high confidence and 4 of 20 current MLS listings still check SLAB. None of the public remarks mention 'concrete slab' or similar terms (0 mentions), so confirmation comes from historical/MLS checkbox data rather than current agent remarks.

No analysis available

No analysis available

The 'above ground' construction flag appears on only 3 of 20 current listings and is not mentioned in any public remarks despite extensive, consistent descriptions of the building (stories, towers, amenities). This pattern suggests the ABOGRO checkbox was inconsistently applied by agents (likely copy/paste errors) rather than indicating a real change to the building.

No analysis available

No analysis available

I looked for short-term rental permission, NUC/TVU language, or vacation-rental approval, but instead found repeated minimum-stay restrictions. That indicates STR is not allowed in the building.

I searched for hotel pool, hotel-managed rental program, Hilton/Trump/Ritz-style pool language, but found none. Since STR is not allowed from the remarks, hotel-pool participation must also be false.

I looked for mandatory participation language such as required rental program, cannot opt out, or owner must pool the unit, but found none. With no hotel-pool program evidenced and STR restricted, this is false.

No analysis available

No analysis available

The remarks provide a clear lease expiration year, 2039. No newer extension appears in the remarks, so 2039 is the best-supported value.

Multiple listings directly confirm VA loan eligibility for the building. This is strong public-remarks evidence, so the feature is marked true with very high confidence.

The remarks repeatedly and directly state that the building is fully insured, including hurricane coverage and 100% replacement-cost language. This is strong, consistent evidence across multiple listings. Confidence is very high.

Fire sprinklers are strongly confirmed across the listings. Numerous remarks explicitly say “fire sprinkler system,” “the building is sprinklered for fire protection,” or “equipped with fire sprinklers,” and this appears repeatedly across multiple agents rather than as a one-off copy-paste. The current remarks are consistent with the historical MLS data showing FIRSPR in most listings.

I looked for FLSE-related language, fire inspection pass wording, and safety-certification phrases across the remarks. The public remarks repeatedly mention fire sprinklers and fire protection, but nothing says the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, so this is marked false with medium confidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are well supported across the building, with multiple listings explicitly mentioning them. I found several clear references such as 'ocean and Waikiki views,' 'stunning ocean horizons,' and 'partial ocean view,' which appear in separate remarks from different listings rather than a single copy-paste note. This is strong building-level evidence that some units offer ocean views.

Mountain views are one of the most consistently reported features in the building. Many listings mention them directly, including 'Ko'olau Mountains,' 'mountain views,' and 'views of the mountain,' across different stacks and towers. The evidence is strong and repeated enough to treat this as a confirmed building-level feature.

Diamond Head views are very strongly supported throughout the remarks. Multiple listings from different towers and floors explicitly describe Diamond Head views, including full, unobstructed, and partial views. This is consistent enough to confirm that the building offers Diamond Head-view units.

City views are well supported across the building. Numerous listings mention "city lights," "city view," or combined views of city, mountain, Diamond Head, and canal, showing this is a recurring building-level feature rather than isolated marketing language. The historical MLS pattern is also strong, with 15/20 listings showing CITY and only 1/20 showing NONE.

No analysis available

Garden views are consistently described across the building’s remarks. Listings mention "garden views," "peaceful garden views," "tropical gardens," and views overlooking the landscaped grounds, aligning with the prior high-confidence MLS data. This appears to be a genuine building-level feature rather than an isolated remark.

Golf course views are repeatedly confirmed in many listings. Current remarks reference "golf course views," "Ala Wai Golf Course," and partial golf course vistas from numerous units, consistent with the building’s established high-confidence profile. The evidence is broad and not just copy-paste from one listing.

Marina/canal-style views are clearly supported, especially through repeated Ala Wai Canal references. Several listings mention 'canal view,' 'Ala Wai Canal,' and combined canal/mountain or canal/Diamond Head views, showing this is a recurring building feature rather than an isolated claim. The remarks are consistent across multiple units and agents.

Sunrise views are clearly supported, though less broadly than the other view types. Multiple remarks explicitly mention sunrise, morning sun, or east-facing units that welcome the sunrise, and the building's east-end Waikiki orientation makes this plausible across several stacks. Confidence is strong but slightly lower than the core views because it appears in fewer listings.

At least 1 listing explicitly references sunsets, with the phrase 'welcomes the sunsets in soft pastels.' Several other remarks describe west/evening-oriented vantage points such as canal, mountain, Diamond Head, and city-light views, which supports that sunset views are available in some units. The evidence appears to come from multiple agents rather than a single copied remark, so this building should be marked as offering sunset views.

No analysis available

I looked for direct phrases such as fireworks view, watch fireworks from the lanai, or see Friday night fireworks from the unit. Nothing in the remarks indicates a fireworks view from the building or units, only other standard Waikiki views.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

Resident manager is very strongly supported by the remarks. Multiple listings independently reference an “on-site resident manager,” “resident manager on the premises,” or “resident manager on property,” indicating this is a building-level feature and not just copy-paste noise. The current remarks align closely with the historical MLS data showing RESMAN in most listings.

No analysis available

No analysis available