Liliuokalani Gardens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Liliuokalani Gardens
Building Overview
Liliuokalani Gardens in Waikiki: 25-floor concrete building (1984) with ocean/Diamond Head views, pool and BBQ area.
About Liliuokalani Gardens
Based on MLS data, Liliuokalani Gardens is a 25-floor condominium located in the East Waikiki neighborhood. Built in 1984 of concrete construction, the building contains 385 total units and is served by two elevators.
According to available records, common amenities include a pool, BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. Units have central air conditioning and some offer views of the ocean, mountains, Diamond Head, and sunsets.
MLS information also notes covered, assigned parking with guest parking available. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The building is managed by Touchstone Properties, Ltd. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify current details, policies and any fees with the listing agent or management company.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for an owner-occupancy percentage or phrases like "80% owner occupied" or "majority owner occupied" and found none. One remark suggests a mix of long-term tenants and owners, but that does not establish a measurable occupancy rate, so the current value is kept with low confidence.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator counts such as "two elevators," "4 elevators," or "multiple elevators" and did not find any. The building clearly has elevators, but the remarks do not confirm the number, so the current value is retained with low confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
This feature is very well supported by both MLS and remarks. Numerous listings explicitly say "Central A/C" and several add that it is "already covered in the maintenance fee," indicating consistent building-level inclusion rather than isolated unit upgrades.
Strong evidence across many listings supports cable being included in the maintenance fee. Multiple remarks explicitly state phrases like "HOA fee includes internet, cable" and "maintenance fees include basic cable," which is consistent with the current MLS CABTV flag and appears repeatedly across agents.
There is moderate historical MLS support for common-area expenses/electricity being included, but the public remarks do not directly call out common electric or building power. This looks more like recurring MLS checkbox data than explicit agent confirmation, so confidence is lower than the other fee inclusions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence shows hot water is included in the maintenance fee. Several listings directly say "HOA fee includes ... hot water" or "maintenance fees include hot water," matching the high-confidence MLS pattern and confirming the feature across multiple remarks.
Internet inclusion is repeatedly confirmed in the remarks, with phrases like "HOA fee includes internet" and "maintenance fee includes ... internet." The MLS data also consistently flags INTSER, so this appears to be a real building-level benefit.
No analysis available
This is one of the strongest features in the dataset. The MLS almost universally flags sewer inclusion, and several remarks explicitly list "water and sewer" or "H/C water & sewer" as part of the maintenance fee.
Water inclusion is consistently supported across the listing set. Remarks frequently mention "water" alongside hot water and sewer, and the MLS data shows water included in nearly every current entry, making this a high-confidence building feature.
Extremely consistent evidence across the listing remarks: roughly 19+ listings mention BBQ amenities. Phrases include "BBQ pavilions," "BBQ areas," "BBQ stations," "barbeque areas," and "BBQ grills," showing this is a shared building amenity and not a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building is repeatedly described as having a clubhouse or equivalent shared social space. Listings mention "clubhouse," "party room," and "meeting room," which strongly supports this as an existing community amenity rather than a mistaken checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate evidence: ~8 of 20 listings reference a meeting or community room. Several remarks explicitly list 'meeting room' or 'community room' (and sometimes 'party room' or 'hospitality room'), so a shared meeting/community room appears to be offered though mentions are fewer than more prominent amenities.
Strong building-level evidence for outdoor amenity spaces: multiple listings explicitly mention shared outdoor features such as "upper patio area," "rooftop lanai," and "private rooftop deck." Historical summary noted ~18 listings referencing outdoor amenity spaces and current MLS checkbox data previously indicated PATDEC/COVPAT on a subset of listings; the public remarks show consistent, multi-agent confirmation of patios/decks and rooftop lanais across the building.
Many listings describe paths used for walking and jogging, often tied to the koi ponds and gardens. The repeated phrases "walking paths" and "walking/jogging paths" across multiple agents indicate a real shared feature.
No analysis available
Moderately strong evidence that some units have private yard-like outdoor space: at least 2–3 listings explicitly advertise unit-level private rooftop outdoor areas ('private 450 square foot rooftop lanai', 'private rooftop deck' / 'private roof top deck'), and several other listings note personal gardening areas or private lanai access for penthouse units. The feature appears limited to select units (penthouses), but is confirmed in multiple agent remarks, so include as available at the building level.
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly reference recreation space, including "recreation area," "recreation room," and a "pool with recreation area." While fewer than BBQ/tennis, the remarks consistently show a shared amenity beyond a single isolated mention.
Multiple listings (10+) explicitly mention indoor shared spaces using terms like "recreation room", "rec room", "party room", "meeting room" or "recreation area." Though historically medium, the present remarks consistently describe common recreation/meeting space available to residents.
Across dozens of remarks, agents describe proximity to Waikiki restaurants but never an in-building restaurant, café, or on-site dining service. Given this and just a single MLS checkbox, the RESTAU entry is almost certainly a data error and the building does not have its own restaurant.
No analysis available
Limited/low-frequency evidence: only ~3 of 20 listings (per MLS summary) mention 'sauna' and a few remarks explicitly list 'sauna' or 'spa/sauna'. This suggests a possible building amenity but with limited corroboration across agents—moderate/low confidence.
Storage is strongly supported across many listings and multiple agents, not just a single copied remark. Current remarks mention both building-level storage and unit-level storage features in many forms, including "secured surfboard and bike storage," "optional storage locker," "extra storage possible to obtain on property," and "large storage closet."
There is overwhelming direct evidence that the building has surfboard storage. It is referenced many times across the remarks, often alongside bike storage and secured storage areas.
Very strong evidence across the remarks, with well over a dozen listings mentioning tennis courts. The feature appears in multiple forms—"tennis courts," "rooftop tennis courts," "lighted tennis courts," and "pickleball/tennis courts"—confirming a shared amenity.
Although remarks mention this less often than BBQ or tennis, the historical MLS prevalence is extremely high and at least one listing explicitly says "Trash chute." Given the strong prior and lack of contradiction, this remains a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The amenity is well supported by repeated, explicit mentions across listings. Agents use multiple equivalent terms—"whirlpool," "spa," "hot tub," and "Jacuzzi"—suggesting consistent recognition of this shared building feature.
Pool is confirmed across the vast majority of listings, with dozens of remarks explicitly mentioning a pool, swimming pool, lap-style use, jacuzzi/whirlpool, or resort-style pool amenities. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listing styles, so this appears to be a stable building feature rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I searched for terms such as "salt water pool," "saltwater pool," and "saline pool." The remarks describe a swimming pool, spa, pool pavilion, and jacuzzi, but never identify the pool as salt water.
Multiple current public remarks explicitly state in-unit laundry: quotes include "in-unit washer and dryer", "washer and dryer in the unit", and "stack washer and dryer"; I counted about 10 listings mentioning in-unit W/D. This confirms historical high-confidence data that some units offer in-unit laundry; evidence appears across different listings/agents and is consistent rather than isolated copy/paste.
Strong, consistent evidence across many listings that Liliuokalani Gardens has shared/community laundry facilities. At least a dozen remarks explicitly mention it using phrases such as "community laundry," "coin-operated laundry," "laundry on the main floor," and "laundry rooms," which suggests this is a real building amenity rather than a copy-paste error. The current remarks reinforce the prior MLS checkbox data, so confidence is very high.
The public remarks repeatedly indicate paid community laundry, including coin-operated machines and mobile pay options. This is strong direct evidence that laundry use requires payment.
I looked for phrases like "laundry on every floor," "floor-by-floor laundry," or similar wording. The remarks only reference community laundry on the main floor/ground floor or laundry rooms, so there is no evidence this feature exists building-wide on every floor.
Parking is strongly supported by both current MLS data and the public remarks. Multiple listings mention assigned stalls, lease/rent parking, guest parking, and garage access, while none of the current MLS records show NONE. This appears to be consistent building-level parking availability rather than isolated copy-paste noise.
Assigned parking is consistently advertised across listings (10 of 20 current MLS entries flag ASSIGN). Multiple remarks explicitly state 'assigned parking $300/year', 'assigned secured garage parking', or 'Assigned parking is rented through the Association', indicating the building offers assigned/reserved stalls through the AOAO.
Covered parking is very strongly supported. Numerous remarks explicitly state garage or covered parking, including phrases like "secured garage parking stall," "covered assigned parking," and "secured covered parking," matching the MLS pattern where 18 of 20 listings flag covered/garage parking. The evidence is consistent across many listings and agents.
The listings consistently describe parking as leased, rented, or assigned through the association rather than owned with the unit. I did not find any public remark indicating deeded or owned parking. This supports false with high confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for a monthly parking charge, but the remarks only provide annual fees and rental terms. Since the feature specifically asks for a monthly parking fee, there is no directly stated monthly amount to extract. This remains unknown/null.
Guest parking is documented in many listings (12 of 20 current MLS entries flag GUEST) and remarks frequently call out 'guest parking', 'ample guest parking', and 'lots of guest parking stalls', indicating visitor stalls are available on-site.
Numerous current remarks explicitly describe secured entry features for parking and building access (quotes include 'secured garage parking stall', '24-hr security', 'fob-entry system', 'multiple gated entries', 'secured pkg entry' and 'FOB for the front entrance and elevator'), corroborating earlier MLS data and indicating secure-entry parking is in place.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly mention a parking waitlist for additional stalls. This is direct evidence that the building uses a waitlist system for parking. Therefore this feature is true with high confidence.
No analysis available
There is strong direct evidence for card/fob access security. Multiple remarks mention key fob entry, secured entrances, and keyed elevator access, which clearly supports this feature.
Security guard service is very well supported for this building. Multiple current listings explicitly mention "24/7 security," "24-hour security," "security guard," and "on-site security," and this matches the historical MLS pattern where 15 of 20 listings included SECGUA. The evidence is strong and consistent across many listings, suggesting this is a real building-level amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
The building is repeatedly described as having ongoing security coverage and patrol-like presence. Mentions of 24/7 security, roving/roaming security, and security guards support security patrol service.
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence confirms central air conditioning throughout Liliuokalani Gardens. Across the provided remarks, well over a dozen listings explicitly mention 'central AC' or equivalent phrasing such as 'central A/C' and 'central air conditioning,' suggesting this is not a one-off agent mistake. The current remarks align with the historical MLS indicators and appear to be consistent across multiple listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports concrete construction. The MLS history shows 15/20 current listings with "CONCRE" in construction materials, which is a high-confidence signal that the towers are concrete. Public remarks focus on amenities and renovations and do not dispute the construction type, suggesting the checkbox data is consistent rather than copy-paste error.
High confidence the building is not double‑wall: only 4 of 20 MLS records check 'DOUWAL', while numerous listings describe a mid‑1980s 24‑story concrete twin‑tower. No public remarks mention 'double wall' and the small number of MLS checks appears inconsistent with the building type, suggesting agent checkbox mistakes.
No analysis available
Moderate MLS checkbox evidence: 6 of 20 current listings indicate 'masonry/stucco' and historical data flagged this as medium confidence. However, public remarks across the listings include 0 mentions of 'masonry' or 'stucco', so the evidence is weak and appears to stem mainly from MLS checkbox entries rather than explicit agent descriptions.
Historical records rated steel-frame construction with high confidence and 3 of 20 current MLS listings have STEFRA checked. Public remarks (dozens of listings) contain 0 mentions of 'steel frame' or related phrases, suggesting agents did not describe it in remarks; evidence relies on prior/higher-confidence dataset and a few MLS checkboxes rather than explicit agent statements.
Prior datasets indicated slab foundation with high confidence and 4 of 20 current MLS listings still check SLAB. None of the public remarks mention 'concrete slab' or similar terms (0 mentions), so confirmation comes from historical/MLS checkbox data rather than current agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The 'above ground' construction flag appears on only 3 of 20 current listings and is not mentioned in any public remarks despite extensive, consistent descriptions of the building (stories, towers, amenities). This pattern suggests the ABOGRO checkbox was inconsistently applied by agents (likely copy/paste errors) rather than indicating a real change to the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for language allowing short-term rentals, vacation rentals, NUC/TVU approvals, or similar permissions, but instead found repeated long-term minimum rental rules. The public remarks consistently indicate 90-day minimum or no daily rentals, which means STR is not allowed. This is a strong negative signal.
I searched for hotel pool, hotel-managed rental program, or similar STR-related participation, but found none. Because STR itself is not allowed per the remarks, hotel pool participation cannot be true here. This is set to false with high confidence.
I searched for mandatory hotel pool language such as required participation, cannot opt out, or must rent through a program, but found nothing. The remarks instead show standard long-term rental restrictions, not a rental-pool regime. This is false with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks include a clear lease expiration year, which is the most direct evidence available. Although many listings are fee simple, at least one public remark identifies a leasehold interest with an end date of 2039. Because the year is explicit, this is set to 2039.
Multiple listings directly confirm VA financing approval for this building. The remarks include explicit VA-approved language, so this is strong public evidence. This feature is therefore set to true with very high confidence.
The remarks repeatedly and directly state the building/association is fully insured, including 100% hurricane coverage and 100% replacement cost. This is strong, repeated evidence, so the feature should be marked true with very high confidence.
Strong, repeated evidence across many listings confirms fire sprinklers. Multiple remarks explicitly say the unit or building has a "fire sprinkler system," is "sprinklered for fire protection," or has "sprinklers throughout," which aligns with the historical MLS FIRSPR data on 16/20 current listings. This appears to be consistent building-level information rather than a one-off agent checkbox.
I searched for terms like fire/life safety evaluation passed, FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, and passed fire inspection, but found none. Several listings mention fire sprinklers or sprinkler systems, which indicate fire protection features, but that is not the same as a documented passed evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Multiple current remarks explicitly reference ocean views or "ocean horizons" and "partial ocean" (e.g., "ocean horizons", "ocean and Waikiki views", "partial ocean view"), appearing across many listings/units. Evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agent remarks, matching prior high-confidence historical data.
Strong building-level evidence for mountain views. Roughly 20+ listings mention them explicitly with phrases such as 'mountain views,' 'Ko'olau Mountains,' and 'mauka' style references, across multiple agents and unit stacks. This is not a copy-paste-only signal; it appears consistently throughout the building's remarks.
Extremely strong evidence that the building offers Diamond Head views. Dozens of listings mention it across both towers and multiple stacks, including 'Diamond Head views,' 'Full Diamond Head Views,' and 'Diamond Head & sunrise views.' The consistency across many remarks strongly supports this feature.
City views are clearly supported at the building level. Many listings mention city lights, downtown/city views, or combined city-and-mountain outlooks, showing this is a recurring building feature rather than a one-off agent error. Evidence appears in multiple unit types and stacks.
No analysis available
Garden views are one of the most consistently described features in the building. Listings repeatedly refer to garden views, tropical landscaping, koi pond areas, and lush grounds, making this a very strong building-level feature. The evidence is broad across many listings and stacks.
Golf course views are strongly and repeatedly confirmed. Numerous remarks across the dataset refer to Ala Wai Golf Course, partial golf course views, or direct golf course panoramas from living rooms, bedrooms, and high floors. This is robust building-level evidence.
Marina/canal-type views are well supported, especially via repeated Ala Wai Canal references. While 'marina' is not always stated verbatim, the remarks frequently describe canal, harbor-like, or waterway views that fit the feature definition. This is consistent across multiple listings and agents.
Sunrise views are clearly supported, though less broadly than the other view types. Multiple remarks explicitly mention sunrise, morning sun, or east-facing units that welcome the sunrise, and the building's east-end Waikiki orientation makes this plausible across several stacks. Confidence is strong but slightly lower than the core views because it appears in fewer listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for direct view language such as "fireworks view," "watch fireworks from the lanai," or similar references. The remarks mention beach proximity and general views, but nothing about fireworks being visible from units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Very strong evidence supports an on-site/resident manager for the building. Dozens of remarks across listings mention "Resident Manager," "resident manager," "on-site manager," or similar language, matching the historical RESMAN presence on 18/20 listings. The consistency across many agents suggests this is a stable building feature, not copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.