Lele Pono
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Lele Pono
Building Overview
Lele Pono in Aiea — concrete building (1976) with ocean/sunset views and onsite pool and BBQ area.
About Lele Pono
Lele Pono is a concrete residential building located in Aiea, built in 1976. According to available records, the building offers ocean and sunset views and is constructed of concrete.
Based on MLS data, onsite amenities include a pool, BBQ area, and a security guard. The building's listed features highlight outdoor viewing opportunities and resident amenities for recreation and security.
Additional details from MLS indicate covered and assigned parking plus guest parking. Pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown. This summary is based on MLS data; prospective buyers should verify all details with the listing agent or property management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for explicit owner-occupancy indicators such as '80% owner occupied,' 'majority owner occupied,' 'highly owner occupied,' or similar language, but found none. Because this is a numeric field and there is no explicit evidence in the listings, I cannot infer a percentage from the remarks alone.
The public remarks directly confirm that this building has 3 elevators, so the current value is supported by the listing text. I looked for any conflicting elevator count, but none was found.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
12 of 20 current listings include OTCOEX, which aligns with the building’s common-area electricity being part of maintenance fees. No public remarks explicitly mention this feature, so the evidence is MLS-driven rather than remark-confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is shown in 9 of 20 current listings, but there is conflicting inclusion of WTRHTR in 3 listings, which weakens certainty. Since none of the public remarks explicitly confirm hot water service, this appears to be a mixed MLS signal rather than a clearly verified building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is strongly supported: 19 of 20 current listings include SEWER in association fees. The consistency across nearly all listings makes this a very high-confidence building-level feature, with no remark-based evidence suggesting otherwise.
Water is strongly supported: 19 of 20 current listings include WATER in association fees. This is consistent across the current MLS dataset and is not undermined by the public remarks.
BBQ is strongly supported across the dataset. Multiple listings explicitly mention shared amenities such as 'BBQ area,' 'BBQ/picnic area,' 'BBQ facilities,' and even 'gas grills,' indicating this is a building-level feature rather than a one-off unit amenity. The consistency across many remarks suggests reliable, repeated MLS and agent reporting rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash facilities are not present in most listings, but multiple remarks do explicitly mention them, including "car wash," "car wash station," and "car wash area." That supports the feature as a real building amenity, though with less widespread confirmation than BBQ or trash chute.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is strongly supported across many listings: dozens of remarks mention a lanai, covered lanai, spacious lanai, or wraparound lanai, and several explicitly reference shared building amenities like a "recreation deck" or "association pool and deck for lounging." The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste, so patio/deck amenities should be treated as present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recreation-area evidence is moderately strong and appears across multiple remarks from different listings. Phrases like "recreation space for all your leisure needs," "recreation room," and "the recreation deck" indicate a shared amenity available in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported for Lele Pono across many listings and multiple agents. At least 10+ current remarks explicitly mention storage in forms such as "assigned storage locker," "storage locker," "external storage closet," "storage cabinet," and "individual storage closet," indicating this is not a one-off or copy-paste error. The evidence is consistent across building-level remarks and unit-specific features, so buyers should consider storage available in the building.
I searched for "surfboard storage," "board storage," "surf storage," and similar amenity descriptions. The listings mention storage lockers, storage closets, and cabinets, but nothing specific to surfboard storage.
No analysis available
Trash chute is well supported by the building data. At least one remark explicitly says 'trash chute on each floor,' and the current MLS checkbox appears in 17 of 20 listings, which is strong corroboration. The evidence suggests this is a genuine building amenity rather than an agent copy-paste artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Limited but explicit evidence: CURRENT MLS lists whirlpool in 1/20 listings and at least one public remark states 'hot tub'/'spa' (other remarks sometimes say 'spa'). Because references are sparse and not widespread across listings, the feature is included with moderate confidence to reflect that buyers may find a hot tub/spa on-site but evidence is not pervasive.
Strong, consistent evidence that Lele Pono has a shared swimming pool. The current remarks mention it in many listings across multiple agents, including phrases such as "pool," "large association pool and deck," "spacious pool area," and "swimming pool," which reinforces the existing MLS amenity data rather than suggesting a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for "salt water pool," "saltwater pool," "salt pool," and similar phrases. The pool is mentioned frequently, but it is never described as saltwater.
Strong, consistent evidence that Lele Pono offers in-unit laundry. In the current remarks, well over a dozen listings explicitly mention it, including wording such as "in-unit laundry," "washer/dryer in unit," "stack washer/dryer," and "W/D in unit." This appears to be a real building feature, not a copy-paste artifact, because the phrasing is repeated across multiple listings and agents.
No analysis available
I looked for terms such as "coin laundry," "coin-op," "quarters," "card operated," or laundry fees. The remarks only reference in-unit laundry and storage/amenity details, with no evidence of paid community laundry.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar wording. The listings mention in-unit laundry several times, but nothing indicates a shared laundry facility on every floor.
MLS checkbox data shows parking present in all 20/20 current listings. Public remarks repeatedly reference covered stalls, guest parking, garage stalls and storage near parking (e.g., '1 covered parking', 'ample guest parking', 'garaged parking stall'), which confirms building-level parking is offered and widely advertised by multiple agents.
The evidence strongly supports assigned/reserved parking at the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention '2 assigned covered parking stalls,' '1 assigned open parking stall,' 'assigned parking stall,' and 'designated parking spaces,' across several agents and remark styles. This is consistent with the historical MLS pattern and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
Covered parking is well supported across the listings. Remarks repeatedly describe 'covered parking stalls,' 'secured garage parking,' 'covered & secured parking,' and 'garaged parking stall,' indicating this is a real building feature rather than a checkbox artifact. The evidence is broad and repeated across many listings.
I looked for remarks saying the parking is deeded, owned, included in deed/title, or described as an owned stall. The listings repeatedly mention assigned, covered, secured, tandem, or parking stall details, but none state that parking is deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for any monthly parking charge, rental fee, additional parking cost, or similar wording. The remarks describe parking availability and stall type, but do not mention any separate parking fee.
Guest parking is clearly supported by both MLS history and public remarks. Many listings mention "ample guest parking," "guest parking stalls," or a "large guest parking area," and these references appear across multiple agents. The feature looks stable and widely advertised for the building.
The building’s parking/entry security is strongly evidenced. Numerous remarks mention "gated community," "secured building," "secured gated parking," "gated entry to parking," and even "digital keys to enter the parking/lobby," which supports secured entry beyond the MLS checkbox data. This is consistent across many listings and appears to be a true building feature.
Tandem parking appears to be available in at least some units at Lele Pono. Several remarks explicitly mention 'two tandem parking stalls' and 'a tandem covered parking stall,' which is strong direct evidence despite the feature appearing in only a small portion of current MLS records. This suggests tandem parking is an offered configuration, not just a data-entry anomaly.
No analysis available
I looked for 'waitlist,' 'waiting list,' or any instructions to join a parking list. Nothing in the remarks suggests a parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
The public remarks include clear evidence of electronic access, specifically digital keys for the parking/lobby. That supports a card/fob access security system for the building.
Evidence is strong and consistent that Lele Pono has security guard/service. Many current listings mention it directly—e.g. "24-hour security," "24/7 security," "security staff," and "on-site security"—and the historical MLS checkbox data was already strong (15 of 20 listings with SECGUA). This looks like a real building-level amenity rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
I looked for patrol-related language such as "security patrol," "roving security," and "patrolled building." The remarks do mention 24-hour security, security staff, and secured entry, but not patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Building-level evidence that some units have window air conditioners: 5 of 20 MLS listings include ACWIUN in inclusions, and multiple remarks explicitly note "Window AC units installed in the living room and primary bedroom in April 2022" and "two window A/C units." Mentions appear across different listings/agents and include specific details and dates, indicating genuine presence rather than obvious copy-paste.
Concrete construction is well supported across the dataset: 17 of 20 current listings show CONCRE checked. Public remarks do not usually spell out 'concrete,' but the consistency of the MLS checkbox across many listings makes this feature highly credible.
Double-wall construction has moderate checkbox support in the MLS data, with 10 of 20 current listings marked DOUWAL. No public remarks explicitly describe double-wall details, so the evidence is suggestive rather than definitive.
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco is not corroborated by the public remarks, and there are no explicit references to 'masonry' or 'stucco' in the listings. With only 9 of 20 current MLS records showing MASSTU and no narrative support, this appears weak and possibly copy-paste driven.
No analysis available
SLAB is recorded in construction_materials for 6/20 listings; high-rise towers of this type typically use slab foundations, though remarks don’t discuss it explicitly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction is not supported by the public remarks and appears in only 2 of 20 current MLS records. With such minimal checkbox frequency and no descriptive confirmation, this feature is best treated as absent.
Only 1/20 MLS checklist entries include BRICK and none of the public remarks (across all listings) mention brick exterior, brick construction, or related phrasing. With no corroborating remarks and no prior evidence, brick construction is unlikely and the lone checkbox appears to be a data entry anomaly.
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental language such as STR permitted, vacation rental allowed, NUC, TVU, or hotel-style transient use, as well as any mention of a 30-day minimum or owner-occupant restrictions. The listings contain no such references, so there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed.
I looked for hotel pool wording such as hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, Hilton/Ritz/Trump pool, or part of hotel operations, and found nothing. Since the remarks do not support STR in the first place, a hotel pool feature is also false.
I searched for language indicating a compulsory rental program, mandatory hotel pool, or required participation, but found none. Because there is no evidence of STR or any hotel-rental program, mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for leasehold language such as 'lease expires,' 'ground lease,' 'leasehold,' 'renewed through,' and similar phrasing, but found nothing. There is no evidence in the listings to identify a lease expiry year.
The public remarks directly and repeatedly reference VA assumable financing, which is strong evidence the building supports VA-related loan assumptions or VA-eligible transactions. I found explicit VA language in more than one listing, so this is high-confidence true.
The listings directly reference comprehensive insurance coverage, including explicit 100% hurricane coverage, which is consistent with a fully insured building/HOA. I looked for wording such as full insurance, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance, and the remarks support that interpretation.
No analysis available
The remarks strongly support fire/life safety compliance through multiple fire-safety references, including full compliance with county fire requirements and installed fire warning components. I searched for explicit FLSE/pass/fire inspection language and found enough consistent evidence to mark this as true.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are overwhelmingly supported across the listing remarks, with many agents explicitly stating "stunning ocean views," "panoramic ocean views," and "ocean horizons." The evidence is consistent across numerous listings and appears to be building-wide, not a one-off unit feature.
Mountain views are well supported by several independent remarks, including “mountains,” “Koolau Mountains,” “mountain peaks,” and “mountain and ocean views.” With 12 of 20 MLS records showing mountain views, the building clearly offers mountain-view units.
Diamond Head views appear in multiple unit remarks, such as “Diamond Head too!,” “Diamond Head, mountain, and Pearl Harbor views,” and “panoramic views from Diamond Head to Ewa.” The MLS data also reflects this with 6 of 20 listings indicating Diamond Head, confirming it as a real building-level view option.
City views are well supported by both the historical MLS data and multiple remarks. Several listings explicitly mention city views or city lights at night, indicating this is a recurring building feature available in some units.
Coastline views are directly confirmed in multiple remarks, including explicit phrases such as "spectacular view of the coastline" and "spectacular view of the coastline, mountains and surrounding areas." The repeated mentions across listings make this a strong building-level feature for buyers seeking coastline views.
No analysis available
Several unit remarks call out golf-course or Pearl Country Club views—examples: "golf course views," "view to Pearl Country Club Golf Course," and "ocean and golf course." These explicit mentions across multiple listings indicate that some units in the building offer golf course views.
No analysis available
Sunrise views are directly supported by multiple listings, with phrases like “both sunrise and sunset right from your lanai” and “breathtaking sunrise views of Oahu.” The MLS data shows sunrise in 9 of 20 view descriptions, indicating a meaningful subset of units with this exposure.
Sunset views are very well supported across the remarks, with multiple listings calling out “sunset views,” “beautiful sunsets,” and even “sunrise and sunset” from the lanai. The MLS data matches this pattern at 13 of 20 listings, so this is a robust building feature.
No analysis available
This is directly stated in the remarks, which satisfies the requirement that fireworks are visible from the building/units. The evidence is strong and explicit, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly mention a resident/on-site manager at Lele Pono. In the remarks, I found phrases such as "resident manager," "onsite resident manager," and "onsite manager" in several separate listings, which supports that this is a real building-level amenity rather than a copy-paste error. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the prior MLS RESMAN checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.