Leisure Heritage

Every MLS entry for this building consistently lists 1974 as the construction year. No listing remarks indicate any alternate build year or complete reconstruction.

MLS listings identify floor 14 as the highest floor, including multiple penthouse listings on floor 14. County and state floor counts are set aside because they use different counting conventions.

The county assessor reports 69 reconciled residential units, and the state registration independently reports 69 units for this single-building registration. The county dwell_sum of 70 is not used because it includes a non-residential or otherwise additional dwelling count.

Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 703. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.

The listings confirm that elevators exist, but none specify two, four, or multiple elevators as a count. No evidence confirms or denies the current value of 2, so it is retained with low confidence.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

At least 8 listings explicitly reference central AC as included or covered by the maintenance fee. The remarks consistently identify central air as a building-provided benefit, corroborated by the 15/17 MLS inclusion rate.

At least 7 listings explicitly mention cable or cable TV as included in the maintenance fee. The repeated wording across multiple listings and the 16/17 MLS inclusion rate provide strong, multi-agent confirmation that cable is included.

At least 1 listing specifically mentions common area expenses, while all 17 current listings contain the OTCOEX association inclusion code. Although this feature is less frequently spelled out in remarks, the universal MLS coding and prior high-confidence evidence strongly support it.

All descriptions treat the property as a condo with standard HOA/maintenance fees and never mention co-op status or co-op taxes. MLS data consistently omits COOTAX, so cooperative taxes are not included in the maintenance.

At least 8 listings explicitly state that electricity is included in the maintenance fee. The wording is repeated across numerous listings from different remarks, and the 15/17 MLS inclusion rate strongly confirms this feature.

Where utilities are detailed, agents list electricity, water, hot water, cable, internet, and sewer but never gas. Combined with MLS consistently leaving GAS unchecked, this strongly indicates that gas is not included in the maintenance fees.

At least 6 listings clearly state that hot water is included in the maintenance fee. The repeated remarks, 16/17 HOTWAT rate, and complete absence of WTRHTR strongly confirm building-supplied hot water.

At least 5 listings explicitly mention included internet service. Although less universal than the other fee inclusions, the repeated building-level statements and 9/16 MLS rate support including it.

All listing descriptions focus on pool, BBQ, parking, and proximity to Waikiki Beach but never reference marina access or boat facilities. MLS data uniformly omits MARINA, indicating marina fees are not part of the maintenance.

At least 7 listings explicitly mention sewer as included in the maintenance fee. The consistent remarks across multiple listings and universal 17/17 MLS coding provide very strong confirmation.

At least 8 listings explicitly mention included water, often alongside hot water and sewer. The repeated wording across multiple listings and universal 17/17 MLS inclusion rate strongly confirm that water is included.

At least 6 current listing remarks explicitly mention building BBQ facilities, using phrases such as "pool with BBQ," "BBQ & outdoor eating area," "pool and BBQ area," "host a BBQ," and "barbeque area." The repeated references across multiple listings and agents strongly confirm this is a shared building amenity rather than an isolated unit feature.

Across all provided remarks, there are detailed amenity descriptions but no reference to bike storage or a bike room. Combined with 0 of 14 MLS entries checking a bike-storage amenity, this strongly indicates the building does not offer dedicated bicycle storage facilities.

While some units have views of the Ala Wai Canal and golf course, no agent claims dock or marina access as a feature. With MLS data also omitting any boat-related amenity, the building appears not to have a boat dock.

At least two separate penthouse listings and building-level descriptions reference an on-site car wash facility. MLS amenity data further supports this, indicating the building provides a shared car wash area for residents.

Despite detailed descriptions of amenities, no agent mentions a clubhouse or similar facility. With all current MLS data also omitting this amenity, it is very likely there is no clubhouse in this building.

Across all provided listings, no agent claims concierge or front-desk service, instead mentioning only a 'site manager' and general building management. With the concierge amenity unchecked throughout the MLS data set, the evidence indicates this building does not offer concierge services.

Pet-oriented amenities such as a dog park or dog run are never described in any listing. The complete absence of this feature from both remarks and MLS amenity fields strongly suggests there is no dog park on-site.

Agents emphasize other services and staff (e.g., 'site manager') but never mention any doorman or lobby attendant in any listing. Given the amenity's marketing value and its absence in both remarks and MLS checkboxes, it is very likely that Leisure Heritage does not have a doorman service.

Across all provided remarks, agents highlight the pool, BBQ, and parking but never refer to a gym, fitness center, or exercise room. With all 14 current MLS listings also leaving the exercise-room amenity unchecked, it is very likely this building does not have an exercise room.

Despite marketing the property as a luxury penthouse and highlighting many conveniences, no agent mentions any limousine or building car service. The complete lack of MLS indication makes it very likely that limo or house-car service is not offered.

Listings focus on residential and leisure amenities without mentioning any dedicated meeting or conference space. The MLS data likewise shows no meeting-room amenity, indicating the building does not provide one.

At least 15 of 17 current listings have patio/deck-related MLS amenities, while numerous independent remarks explicitly describe multiple lanais, balconies, and outdoor spaces. Key phrases include "THREE lanais," "3 private lanais," "three balconies," and "one of your 7 lanais"; the evidence is strong across many listings and agents, not limited to a single copied description.

While the neighborhood is described as highly walkable and near Kapiolani Park, there is no indication of a private jogging or walking path belonging to the building. MLS data also omits this feature, suggesting the building itself does not offer a jogging path.

Although several listings mention views of the pool and mountains, none describe any children's play structures or playground. Combined with blank MLS playground fields, this indicates the building does not have a playground.

Across all the provided listings, outdoor space is always described as lanais, balconies, or a rooftop deck—never as a yard or fenced/private yard. Combined with 0/14 MLS entries indicating a private yard amenity, this strongly suggests the building does not offer private yard spaces.

Agents highlight the pool, BBQ, and views of the Ala Wai golf course, but not an on-site putting green. The absence of this amenity from MLS data and remarks makes it very likely that no putting green exists at the building.

Multiple agents refer to a combined pool and BBQ area, implying a shared outdoor recreation/amenity space. The presence of RECARE in several MLS records further supports that the building offers a common recreation area or amenity deck.

Agents consistently highlight features such as the pool, BBQ area, and community storage but never a rec or game room. The absence of this amenity in both remarks and all MLS checkboxes indicates the building does not have a dedicated recreation room.

Agents repeatedly emphasize easy access to nearby dining but do not claim any in-building restaurant or dining facility. With no MLS records marking this amenity, the building appears not to contain its own restaurant.

The only rooftop mentions clearly describe a private deck for a particular penthouse, not a common rooftop facility. Since MLS records also do not list a rooftop amenity, the building appears not to offer shared rooftop access.

Even in detailed amenity descriptions, there is no reference to a sauna or steam facility. The MLS data confirms this absence, indicating the building does not offer a sauna.

Multiple listings describe building-level storage, including a 'community storage room' and 'Storage accessible from parking garage,' indicating shared storage options for residents. MLS checkbox data (storage/extra storage in 7 of 14 amenities and 4 unit-feature entries) consistently supports the presence of storage. Evidence is strong across different listings and agents, so storage units/lockers are included for this building.

The remarks mention a 'community storage room' and 'storage accessible from parking garage' but never specify surfboard-related storage. I searched for terms like surfboard, surf storage, and board storage and found no direct evidence. Based on the absence of specific mentions, dedicated surfboard storage likely does not exist.

None of the unit descriptions mention tennis courts or tennis facilities, even when listing other amenities like the pool and BBQ. With all MLS records leaving the tennis-court field blank, it is very likely the building does not offer a tennis court.

No current public remark explicitly mentions a "trash chute," but 12 of 17 current listings mark TRACHU in the MLS amenities, reinforcing the prior high-confidence determination. The absence of descriptive remarks is not sufficient to overturn the repeated building-level MLS data, though the evidence is more checkbox-based than remark-based.

Parking is described as assigned or tandem stalls in a secure/gated garage plus some guest parking, with no indication of valet or valet parking. Given both the narrative descriptions and the absence of the VALET amenity in current MLS data, it is very likely the building does not offer valet service.

Several listings for different units describe 'gated covered parking,' a 'gated garage,' and 'secured gated covered parking,' and a subset of MLS entries explicitly mark the GATED/WALFEN amenity. This consistent emphasis on gated vehicle access supports treating the property as having a gated/walled physical security feature relevant to buyers seeking gated buildings.

Agents repeatedly describe a pool and BBQ area but never reference a spa, hot tub, or whirlpool, which would usually be highlighted if present. With only a small minority of MLS entries marking WHIRLP and no textual support, it is more likely that the building does not have a whirlpool.

The pool is strongly validated across the building: at least 8 listings explicitly mention a "pool," "pool area," "pool and BBQ area," or "swimming pool on site." Multiple agents also describe units overlooking the pool or list it as a complex/building amenity, so this is not merely an isolated or copy-pasted claim.

No listing remarks describe the building’s pool as heated, and 0/14 current MLS entries mark any heated-pool features. Given this consistent absence in both checkbox data and marketing language, it is very likely the building’s common pool is not heated.

The remarks confirm the presence of a pool multiple times but never describe it as salt water, saltwater, saline, or similar. Based on the absence of any such wording in numerous listings, the pool is assumed not to be salt water, though this cannot be confirmed with high certainty from remarks alone.

In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the building: at least six listings explicitly mention it, including "in-unit W/D," "Washer & Dryer in Unit," "Inside Laundry," and "full sized stackable in unit washer and dryer." The MLS inclusion is also consistent in 17 of 17 listings, with confirmations appearing across multiple remarks rather than relying only on a single checkbox.

None of the many listing remarks reference shared or community laundry facilities, while several specifically highlight in-unit washer/dryer instead. With 0/14 MLS records marking community laundry, the evidence points to the building not offering a common laundry room.

Listings only reference in-unit laundry and do not describe any shared laundry facilities that require payment. Searched for 'coin-op', 'coin laundry', 'card-operated', 'paid laundry', and similar terms with no results. In the absence of any such mentions, paid community laundry is assumed not to be present.

Remarks mention in-unit washer/dryer and full-sized stackable laundry in units, but nothing about shared or community laundry rooms on each floor. Searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'community laundry', and 'laundry room on every floor' with no matches. Based on this absence, it is likely there is no community laundry on every floor.

At least 14 listings explicitly mention parking, including phrases such as "1 covered parking," "two car tandem parking inside a secure garage," "tandem garaged 2 car parking," and "high clearance covered parking." The evidence is strong across multiple listings and agents, confirming that the building offers parking.

At least 8 listings explicitly mention assigned or dedicated parking, including "one assigned parking stall," "1 assigned covered secured parking #29 D," "one dedicated parking space," and numbered secured stalls. This is consistent with the strong MLS checkbox evidence and confirms assigned parking is available in the building.

At least 9 listings explicitly mention covered or enclosed parking, including “two car tandem parking inside a secure garage,” “1 assigned covered secured parking,” “gated covered parking,” “underground, in a gated garage,” and “high clearance covered parking.” The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents and confirms that the building offers covered parking.

Multiple listings confirm assigned or dedicated parking stalls, including tandem stalls for penthouses. However, assigned parking does not establish deeded ownership, and no remarks explicitly say the parking is included in the deed or owned.

Across all reviewed listings, neither the MLS checkboxes nor public remarks mention EV charging or stations. This strongly suggests the building does not currently provide dedicated EV charging facilities.

The remarks describe assigned, covered, secured, tandem, guest, and street parking. They do not provide a monthly or additional parking fee, so no parking charge is evidenced.

At least 5 listings mention guest parking, including "guest parking," "Free guest parking," and "3 guest parking stalls." The repeated remarks from multiple listings, together with 12 of 17 current MLS records marked GUEST, strongly confirm building guest parking.

Multiple agents independently reference gated or secured garages and stalls, indicating controlled access to the parking area. This supports that the building’s parking has some form of secure or gated entry system.

Tandem parking is repeatedly and explicitly mentioned for certain units, especially penthouses. This confirms that at least some stalls in the building are configured as tandem parking.

Neither the MLS nor any public remarks reference valet or attended parking. Given the number of listings and detailed parking descriptions, it is very likely the building does not offer valet parking services.

The listings discuss assigned stalls, tandem parking, guest parking, and nearby street parking. No evidence was found of a building parking waitlist system.

Listings acknowledge the presence of elevators but never describe them as keyed, fob-access, or restricted, even in high-end penthouse marketing where such a feature would be a selling point. Combined with the unchecked MLS elevator-security amenity across all units, this suggests the elevators are not access-controlled by key or fob at the cab level.

Public remarks emphasize security and gated/secured parking but never specify card or fob-based access. Phrases like 'secure building' and 'secured parking' could indicate locks or gates, yet there is no clear evidence of an electronic key card or fob system, so this feature is set to false based on available information.

Multiple listings (covering both penthouse and standard units) call Leisure Heritage a 'secure, well-managed building' but none mention a security guard or 24-hour security. MLS data for 14 listings has the security-guard amenity unchecked, suggesting this is not a staffed-guard building. Given how marketable a guard is, its complete absence from remarks is strong evidence it does not exist.

The listing comments describe the building as secure and well managed but do not reference any kind of roving or on-site security patrol service. Given the complete absence of terms indicating active patrols, this feature is assumed not present based on current remarks.

Agents describe the property as 'secure' and emphasize gated/secured parking but never reference cameras or video surveillance in any listing. With the MLS video-security checkbox consistently left unchecked, the most likely interpretation is that dedicated security camera/video systems are not a marketed building feature here.

Central air is overwhelmingly confirmed across the building: at least 11 of 17 remarks explicitly mention "Central AC," "central A/C," or "central air," and one describes a "custom-designed central AC system." The evidence is repeated across multiple listing descriptions and aligns with MLS data showing ACCEN/CENAC in 14 of 17 listings and ACCEN in inclusions for 16 of 17, so this is strong building-level evidence rather than an isolated copied checkbox.

All marketing remarks and MLS fields consistently reference central AC only, with no indication of ductless mini-split or split systems in any unit. Given the strong central AC coverage and complete absence of split AC mentions or checkboxes, it is very likely that split AC is not a feature of this building.

None of the remarks advertise window AC, and agents instead emphasize central AC as the building’s cooling system, with HOA including electricity and AC. The lack of any window AC mentions or MLS flags across many units makes it very likely that window AC is not a building feature.

Concrete construction is recorded across all 17 current listings, providing exceptionally strong, building-wide evidence. A listing also explicitly calls it a "well-built CONCRETE building," confirming this is not merely an isolated checkbox.

No MLS entries or public remarks indicate double-wall construction. Given the building’s high-rise concrete character, double-wall construction can be confidently excluded.

No MLS data or narrative comments mention hollow tile construction. Given the consistent omission across all listings and the building type, hollow tile construction is very unlikely.

No current public remarks mention masonry, stucco, or masonry-and-stucco construction. Only 1 of 17 listings checks MASSTU, against a consistent historical absence, so the isolated checkbox does not substantiate the feature.

No MLS entries claim steel-frame construction and no remarks reference a steel frame. While reinforced concrete contains steel, it is not marketed or coded here as a steel-frame building, so the steel-frame feature is considered not present.

Two of 17 current listings identify a slab foundation, and the building's high-rise concrete construction strongly supports a concrete slab foundation. The evidence is implied and partially checkbox-based rather than explicitly described in multiple remarks, so confidence is moderate-high.

No analysis available

Zero listings mark wood-frame construction and no remarks mention wood framing. The property is a high-rise concrete-style condo, so wood-frame construction can be confidently ruled out.

None of the provided remarks mention above-ground construction. The feature appears in only 2 of 17 MLS records and lacks narrative confirmation, making it likely an erroneous or copied checkbox rather than a validated building feature.

None of the listings identify brick in the construction fields and no agent remarks refer to brick or brick-and-mortar construction. This strongly indicates the building is not a brick-constructed structure.

All listings omit single-wall construction and the building is clearly a multi-story Waikiki condo tower. This makes single-wall construction effectively impossible for this property.

A six-month minimum rental requirement is directly stated in the remarks. No listing mentions legal short-term rentals, vacation-rental permission, NUC, or TVU authorization.

Because short-term rental use is not permitted under the stated rental minimum, the prerequisite for hotel-pool participation is not met. The remarks also contain no reference to a hotel-managed rental pool.

The six-month minimum rental term is incompatible with mandatory hotel-pool participation as defined here. No remarks state that owners must participate in a rental program or cannot opt out.

None of the many remarks for Leisure Heritage reference lease rent or lease expiration, and the units are marketed with conventional and VA financing. This pattern is consistent with a fee simple building and not with leasehold marketing language.

Across all provided listings, there is no mention of leasehold terms, lease rent, or lease expiration—only regular maintenance fees are discussed. This strongly indicates the building does not offer leasehold units.

The remarks were searched for leasehold, land-lease, ground-lease, lease-expiry, and renewal language. No specific four-digit lease expiration year was found, so the expiry remains unknown.

The public remarks repeatedly state that Leisure Heritage is VA approved and that eligible buyers may assume existing VA loans. This is strong, direct evidence that VA financing is available.

Insurance is mentioned in several listings, but the remarks do not establish that the HOA provides fully insured walls-in coverage. The hurricane insurance statement does not by itself confirm full building insurance, so this remains unconfirmed.

A minority of MLS records (2 of 14) show the fire sprinkler amenity checked, but no listing remarks reference sprinklers or a fire suppression system. Given the inconsistency and lack of textual support, the building is unlikely to have a sprinkler system.

The remarks were searched for fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE, fire safety certification, life-safety compliance, and passed fire inspection language. No relevant statement was found, so there is insufficient evidence that the building has passed.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are documented in 8 of 16 current listings across multiple units and agents. Remarks include "a bit of ocean views," "Ocean & City View," "peek-a-boo ocean view," and "OCEAN, DIAMOND HEAD & MOUNTAIN VIEWS," confirming that the building offers ocean-view units.

Mountain views are exceptionally well supported, appearing in 15 of 17 current listings. Multiple independent remarks explicitly reference Ko'olau Mountains, Koolau Mountain views, and mountain views, confirming this is a recurring building offering rather than a single-unit claim.

Diamond Head views are mentioned in 10 of 16 current listings and are described for multiple unit types. Key phrases include "partial Diamond Head," "Diamond Head, ocean, and city lights views," and "OCEAN, DIAMOND HEAD & MOUNTAIN VIEWS," indicating more than a single isolated listing.

City views are documented in 10 of 17 current listings and are supported by repeated remarks from multiple listings. Key phrases include "Ocean & City View," "city lights views," and "Diamond Head and City Views," indicating the building offers units with city views.

Several units, particularly penthouses and ocean-facing corners, are described with expansive ocean views near the shoreline, suggesting that the beachline itself is visible from some angles. A small number of agents have specifically checked COASTL in MLS, indicating coastline or shoreline vistas. This is inferred from MLS and context rather than frequent explicit wording in remarks.

Several agents have selected GARDEN as a view type in the MLS, implying outlooks over landscaped or courtyard spaces, likely around the pool/amenity areas. While remarks focus more on ocean, mountain, and canal views, the repeated MLS checkbox usage indicates that at least some units offer garden or courtyard-style views. Buyers looking for greener outlooks should consider certain stacks here.

The remarks include “mountain and Ala Wai golf course views” and “a very beautiful Ala Wai Canal & Golf course View.” Additional listings reference the nearby Ala Wai Golf Course, and the direct view descriptions across multiple units support inclusion.

Marina-related views are supported in 10 of 17 current listings, consistently referring to the Ala Wai Canal and nearby water activity. Remarks such as "views of the canal," "Ala Wai Canal views," and watching "sailboats drift by" provide strong confirmation that canal/marina views are available in the building.

Sunrise views are supported in 4 of 16 current listings, but the evidence is less explicit than for ocean, mountain, or Diamond Head views. Diamond Head-facing units, preferred eastern-side positioning, and references to sunset/sun exposure provide moderate support, so the feature is included with lower confidence.

A penthouse description invites residents to 'soak in the gorgeous sunset ocean views', clearly documenting sunset exposure from at least one stack. Given the building's Waikiki location and this explicit marketing, sunset views are a real and marketable feature for some units. MLS view selections are consistent with this evidence.

Across numerous listings, agents highlight ocean, mountain, Diamond Head, city, canal, golf course, pool, and garden-type views, but there is no mention of cemetery views. MLS view data likewise shows zero entries for cemetery. This strongly suggests that cemetery views are not a feature of this building.

I searched for mentions of fireworks views, Friday night shows, or watching fireworks from the lanai/unit and found none. Given that many view types are described in detail without mentioning fireworks, it's somewhat likely the building does not notably feature fireworks views. However, absence of mention is not definitive, so confidence is moderate.

No analysis available

The collected listings are detailed about views, parking, AC, rental minimums, and amenities but completely silent on pets. Since there is no explicit 'pets allowed' or 'no pets' language in remarks or MLS restriction codes, the building’s pet policy remains uncertain and pets_allowed is not supported by current evidence.

At least 2 current listings explicitly mention an on-site manager, including “helpful site manager” and “maintenance fee INCLUDES ... site manager.” This aligns with the prior high-confidence evidence and the RESMAN amenity appearing in 5/17 listings, supporting that the building has a resident/site manager.

Listings describe conventional owner-occupant and long-term-use features, including VA financing and a 6‑month minimum rental period, which are inconsistent with hotel-style nightly rentals. With no textual or MLS architectural-style indication of hotel operations, the building is best classified as a regular condominium, not a condotel.

The building is repeatedly referred to and marketed as a condominium with typical condo-style maintenance fees and VA loan eligibility, with no mention of shares or co-op ownership structures. Both narrative remarks and MLS fee coding strongly support that this is not a cooperative building.