Leisure Heritage

Every MLS entry for this building consistently lists 1974 as the construction year. No listing remarks indicate any alternate build year or complete reconstruction.

MLS floor data for units in Leisure Heritage ranges from low floors up to the 14th, with 14 the highest observed unit floor. Penthouse references align with this top level, indicating the building is 14 stories tall.

Several listings mention that there are 'only 5 units per floor' in this building. Combined with the 14-floor height, this strongly suggests approximately 70 units in total.

The remarks were searched for statements such as '80% owner occupied,' 'majority owner occupied,' and 'highly owner occupied.' No owner-occupancy information was found, so the current value of 60.0 is retained with low confidence.

The remarks confirm that elevators exist but do not state whether the building has two, four, or multiple elevators. Per the numeric-field rule, the current value of 2 is retained because there is no evidence to confirm or deny it.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

At least 6 listings reference included central air, including "HOA Includes--ELECTRICITY- CENTRAL AC" and "Maintenance fee includes Electricity, AC." The evidence is repeated across multiple listings and agrees with 13/15 MLS records.

At least 6 listings explicitly mention cable, including "cable TV," "TV," and "Maintenance fee includes ... cable (Disney+ and 1 DVR unit included)." This strongly confirms the building-level inclusion and aligns with 14/15 current MLS records.

At least 2 listings explicitly identify common expenses, including "COMMON AREA EXPENSES" and "common expenses." Although the phrase is less frequent in public remarks, the feature is uniformly present in current MLS data at 15/15.

All descriptions treat the property as a condo with standard HOA/maintenance fees and never mention co-op status or co-op taxes. MLS data consistently omits COOTAX, so cooperative taxes are not included in the maintenance.

At least 8 listings mention included electricity, including "Maintenance fee includes electricity" and "Maintenance fee INCLUDES ALL ELECTRICITY." The repeated statements across multiple agents strongly confirm this feature.

Where utilities are detailed, agents list electricity, water, hot water, cable, internet, and sewer but never gas. Combined with MLS consistently leaving GAS unchecked, this strongly indicates that gas is not included in the maintenance fees.

At least 6 listings explicitly mention hot water, including "HOT WATER" and "Maintenance fee covers electricity, water/hot water." The lack of any WTRHTR inclusion indicator and the 14/15 MLS agreement provide strong confirmation.

Multiple listings say "internet included" or list "internet" alongside electricity, cable, and common expenses. The evidence is somewhat less universal than for utilities, but it is repeated across several listings and supported by 8/15 MLS records.

All listing descriptions focus on pool, BBQ, parking, and proximity to Waikiki Beach but never reference marina access or boat facilities. MLS data uniformly omits MARINA, indicating marina fees are not part of the maintenance.

At least 6 listings mention sewer, including "Cable, hot water, sewer and water" and "Maintenance fee INCLUDES ALL ELECTRICITY, water, sewer." Uniform current MLS coding at 15/15 makes this a strong building-level feature.

At least 7 listings mention included water, including "Maintenance fee includes Electricity... sewer and water" and "water/hot water." The remarks are consistent across listings and current MLS data confirms WATER in 15/15 records.

Multiple current listings explicitly mention shared BBQ facilities, including “BBQ area,” “pool and BBQ area,” and “a barbeque area, ideal for entertaining.” The repeated references across different listing remarks, combined with the historically high confidence and 14/15 current MLS amenity records, strongly support that the building offers BBQ facilities rather than this being a checkbox-only artifact.

Across all provided remarks, there are detailed amenity descriptions but no reference to bike storage or a bike room. Combined with 0 of 14 MLS entries checking a bike-storage amenity, this strongly indicates the building does not offer dedicated bicycle storage facilities.

While some units have views of the Ala Wai Canal and golf course, no agent claims dock or marina access as a feature. With MLS data also omitting any boat-related amenity, the building appears not to have a boat dock.

At least two separate penthouse listings and building-level descriptions reference an on-site car wash facility. MLS amenity data further supports this, indicating the building provides a shared car wash area for residents.

Despite detailed descriptions of amenities, no agent mentions a clubhouse or similar facility. With all current MLS data also omitting this amenity, it is very likely there is no clubhouse in this building.

Across all provided listings, no agent claims concierge or front-desk service, instead mentioning only a 'site manager' and general building management. With the concierge amenity unchecked throughout the MLS data set, the evidence indicates this building does not offer concierge services.

Pet-oriented amenities such as a dog park or dog run are never described in any listing. The complete absence of this feature from both remarks and MLS amenity fields strongly suggests there is no dog park on-site.

Agents emphasize other services and staff (e.g., 'site manager') but never mention any doorman or lobby attendant in any listing. Given the amenity's marketing value and its absence in both remarks and MLS checkboxes, it is very likely that Leisure Heritage does not have a doorman service.

Across all provided remarks, agents highlight the pool, BBQ, and parking but never refer to a gym, fitness center, or exercise room. With all 14 current MLS listings also leaving the exercise-room amenity unchecked, it is very likely this building does not have an exercise room.

Despite marketing the property as a luxury penthouse and highlighting many conveniences, no agent mentions any limousine or building car service. The complete lack of MLS indication makes it very likely that limo or house-car service is not offered.

Listings focus on residential and leisure amenities without mentioning any dedicated meeting or conference space. The MLS data likewise shows no meeting-room amenity, indicating the building does not provide one.

At least 10 current listing remarks explicitly mention patio/deck-type outdoor spaces, including 'three lanais,' '3 private lanais,' 'THREE balconies,' '7 lanais,' and a 'roof top deck.' The evidence is strong across multiple agents and is consistent with the 13/15 current MLS amenity records, confirming that the building offers patio/deck amenities.

While the neighborhood is described as highly walkable and near Kapiolani Park, there is no indication of a private jogging or walking path belonging to the building. MLS data also omits this feature, suggesting the building itself does not offer a jogging path.

Although several listings mention views of the pool and mountains, none describe any children's play structures or playground. Combined with blank MLS playground fields, this indicates the building does not have a playground.

Across all the provided listings, outdoor space is always described as lanais, balconies, or a rooftop deck—never as a yard or fenced/private yard. Combined with 0/14 MLS entries indicating a private yard amenity, this strongly suggests the building does not offer private yard spaces.

Agents highlight the pool, BBQ, and views of the Ala Wai golf course, but not an on-site putting green. The absence of this amenity from MLS data and remarks makes it very likely that no putting green exists at the building.

Multiple agents refer to a combined pool and BBQ area, implying a shared outdoor recreation/amenity space. The presence of RECARE in several MLS records further supports that the building offers a common recreation area or amenity deck.

Agents consistently highlight features such as the pool, BBQ area, and community storage but never a rec or game room. The absence of this amenity in both remarks and all MLS checkboxes indicates the building does not have a dedicated recreation room.

Agents repeatedly emphasize easy access to nearby dining but do not claim any in-building restaurant or dining facility. With no MLS records marking this amenity, the building appears not to contain its own restaurant.

The only rooftop mentions clearly describe a private deck for a particular penthouse, not a common rooftop facility. Since MLS records also do not list a rooftop amenity, the building appears not to offer shared rooftop access.

Even in detailed amenity descriptions, there is no reference to a sauna or steam facility. The MLS data confirms this absence, indicating the building does not offer a sauna.

Multiple listings describe building-level storage, including a 'community storage room' and 'Storage accessible from parking garage,' indicating shared storage options for residents. MLS checkbox data (storage/extra storage in 7 of 14 amenities and 4 unit-feature entries) consistently supports the presence of storage. Evidence is strong across different listings and agents, so storage units/lockers are included for this building.

The remarks mention a 'community storage room' and 'storage accessible from parking garage' but never specify surfboard-related storage. I searched for terms like surfboard, surf storage, and board storage and found no direct evidence. Based on the absence of specific mentions, dedicated surfboard storage likely does not exist.

None of the unit descriptions mention tennis courts or tennis facilities, even when listing other amenities like the pool and BBQ. With all MLS records leaving the tennis-court field blank, it is very likely the building does not offer a tennis court.

A strong majority of MLS listings for this building list a trash chute amenity, suggesting this is a standard feature. The consistency across many records supports the presence of a shared trash chute system in the building.

Parking is described as assigned or tandem stalls in a secure/gated garage plus some guest parking, with no indication of valet or valet parking. Given both the narrative descriptions and the absence of the VALET amenity in current MLS data, it is very likely the building does not offer valet service.

Several listings for different units describe 'gated covered parking,' a 'gated garage,' and 'secured gated covered parking,' and a subset of MLS entries explicitly mark the GATED/WALFEN amenity. This consistent emphasis on gated vehicle access supports treating the property as having a gated/walled physical security feature relevant to buyers seeking gated buildings.

Agents repeatedly describe a pool and BBQ area but never reference a spa, hot tub, or whirlpool, which would usually be highlighted if present. With only a small minority of MLS entries marking WHIRLP and no textual support, it is more likely that the building does not have a whirlpool.

The pool is strongly confirmed across the building: 15/15 current listings include pool-related MLS amenities, and at least six remarks explicitly mention a shared pool or pool area. Repeated descriptions such as "Enjoy a dip in the pool," "relaxing pool," and "POOL IN COMPLEX" appear across multiple listings, confirming this is a building amenity rather than a unit-specific or isolated claim.

No listing remarks describe the building’s pool as heated, and 0/14 current MLS entries mark any heated-pool features. Given this consistent absence in both checkbox data and marketing language, it is very likely the building’s common pool is not heated.

The remarks confirm the presence of a pool multiple times but never describe it as salt water, saltwater, saline, or similar. Based on the absence of any such wording in numerous listings, the pool is assumed not to be salt water, though this cannot be confirmed with high certainty from remarks alone.

At least five current remarks explicitly mention in-unit laundry, including "in-unit washer/dryer," "Washer & Dryer in Unit," "Washer Dryer in the unit," and "full sized stackable in unit washer and dryer." The evidence is consistent across multiple distinct listings and strongly confirms the 15/15 MLS inclusion data rather than indicating copy-paste error.

None of the many listing remarks reference shared or community laundry facilities, while several specifically highlight in-unit washer/dryer instead. With 0/14 MLS records marking community laundry, the evidence points to the building not offering a common laundry room.

Listings only reference in-unit laundry and do not describe any shared laundry facilities that require payment. Searched for 'coin-op', 'coin laundry', 'card-operated', 'paid laundry', and similar terms with no results. In the absence of any such mentions, paid community laundry is assumed not to be present.

Remarks mention in-unit washer/dryer and full-sized stackable laundry in units, but nothing about shared or community laundry rooms on each floor. Searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'community laundry', and 'laundry room on every floor' with no matches. Based on this absence, it is likely there is no community laundry on every floor.

Every MLS listing for this building indicates at least one parking stall, and many remarks explicitly mention included parking. Buyers can reliably expect on-site parking with units in this building.

Parking appears to be assigned to specific units, with several listings explicitly using the word 'assigned' and referencing specific stall numbers. This strongly supports that the building provides assigned or deeded parking stalls.

At least 9 listings explicitly mention covered or enclosed parking, including “two car tandem parking inside a secure garage,” “1 assigned covered secured parking,” “gated covered parking,” “underground, in a gated garage,” and “high clearance covered parking.” The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents and confirms that the building offers covered parking.

Multiple listings confirm assigned or dedicated parking, including two-car tandem parking. However, assigned or dedicated parking does not establish deeded ownership, and no remarks explicitly mention a deeded parking stall.

Across all reviewed listings, neither the MLS checkboxes nor public remarks mention EV charging or stations. This strongly suggests the building does not currently provide dedicated EV charging facilities.

The remarks were searched for parking fees, monthly parking charges, rental rates, and additional parking costs. None were found, so there is no evidence of a separately stated parking fee.

At least 4 listings explicitly mention guest parking, including “some guest parking,” “GUEST PARKING,” and “3 guest parking stalls.” These references occur across different unit listings and align with the current MLS data, confirming that the building provides guest parking.

Multiple agents independently reference gated or secured garages and stalls, indicating controlled access to the parking area. This supports that the building’s parking has some form of secure or gated entry system.

Tandem parking is repeatedly and explicitly mentioned for certain units, especially penthouses. This confirms that at least some stalls in the building are configured as tandem parking.

Neither the MLS nor any public remarks reference valet or attended parking. Given the number of listings and detailed parking descriptions, it is very likely the building does not offer valet parking services.

The listings mention assigned, covered, secured, tandem, guest, and dedicated parking. They do not mention a parking waitlist or joining a waiting list for a stall.

Listings acknowledge the presence of elevators but never describe them as keyed, fob-access, or restricted, even in high-end penthouse marketing where such a feature would be a selling point. Combined with the unchecked MLS elevator-security amenity across all units, this suggests the elevators are not access-controlled by key or fob at the cab level.

Public remarks emphasize security and gated/secured parking but never specify card or fob-based access. Phrases like 'secure building' and 'secured parking' could indicate locks or gates, yet there is no clear evidence of an electronic key card or fob system, so this feature is set to false based on available information.

Multiple listings (covering both penthouse and standard units) call Leisure Heritage a 'secure, well-managed building' but none mention a security guard or 24-hour security. MLS data for 14 listings has the security-guard amenity unchecked, suggesting this is not a staffed-guard building. Given how marketable a guard is, its complete absence from remarks is strong evidence it does not exist.

The listing comments describe the building as secure and well managed but do not reference any kind of roving or on-site security patrol service. Given the complete absence of terms indicating active patrols, this feature is assumed not present based on current remarks.

Agents describe the property as 'secure' and emphasize gated/secured parking but never reference cameras or video surveillance in any listing. With the MLS video-security checkbox consistently left unchecked, the most likely interpretation is that dedicated security camera/video systems are not a marketed building feature here.

Central air is strongly confirmed across multiple independent listings: at least 9 remarks explicitly mention "central A/C," "CENTRAL AC," or "central air," while several others state that maintenance fees include AC. The evidence is consistent with the historical high-confidence determination and the current MLS checkboxes, indicating a building-wide system rather than isolated or copy-pasted unit data.

All marketing remarks and MLS fields consistently reference central AC only, with no indication of ductless mini-split or split systems in any unit. Given the strong central AC coverage and complete absence of split AC mentions or checkboxes, it is very likely that split AC is not a feature of this building.

None of the remarks advertise window AC, and agents instead emphasize central AC as the building’s cooling system, with HOA including electricity and AC. The lack of any window AC mentions or MLS flags across many units makes it very likely that window AC is not a building feature.

Concrete construction is consistently recorded in the MLS data for all 15 current listings, following 14 of 14 historical listings with the same designation. Although the provided remarks do not explicitly say “concrete construction,” the unanimous repeated MLS classification across many listings strongly supports the feature and does not appear to be an isolated agent entry.

No MLS entries or public remarks indicate double-wall construction. Given the building’s high-rise concrete character, double-wall construction can be confidently excluded.

No MLS data or narrative comments mention hollow tile construction. Given the consistent omission across all listings and the building type, hollow tile construction is very unlikely.

The MLS records never indicate masonry/stucco and no listing remarks highlight a masonry or stucco build. This points to the building not being classified as masonry-stucco construction in this market.

No MLS entries claim steel-frame construction and no remarks reference a steel frame. While reinforced concrete contains steel, it is not marketed or coded here as a steel-frame building, so the steel-frame feature is considered not present.

High-rise condo buildings like this in Waikiki are virtually always built on concrete slab foundations, and at least one listing marks SLAB in the MLS. Combining that with the building form and lack of contrary evidence, slab construction is very likely present.

No analysis available

Zero listings mark wood-frame construction and no remarks mention wood framing. The property is a high-rise concrete-style condo, so wood-frame construction can be confidently ruled out.

A single listing checking 'above ground' against 13 that do not, with no narrative support, looks like an inconsistent checkbox rather than a true building attribute. The building is best understood as not having the MLS 'above ground' construction type.

None of the listings identify brick in the construction fields and no agent remarks refer to brick or brick-and-mortar construction. This strongly indicates the building is not a brick-constructed structure.

All listings omit single-wall construction and the building is clearly a multi-story Waikiki condo tower. This makes single-wall construction effectively impossible for this property.

The six-month minimum rental requirement is repeated in the listing data and directly conflicts with short-term rental use. No listing mentions legal STR authorization, NUC, TVU, or vacation-rental permission.

Because STR is not allowed, the hotel rental pool prerequisite is not met. The remarks also contain no references to a hotel rental program, condotel operation, or branded hotel management.

The building cannot have mandatory hotel-pool participation when short-term rentals are not allowed. No remarks state that owners must participate in a rental pool.

None of the many remarks for Leisure Heritage reference lease rent or lease expiration, and the units are marketed with conventional and VA financing. This pattern is consistent with a fee simple building and not with leasehold marketing language.

Across all provided listings, there is no mention of leasehold terms, lease rent, or lease expiration—only regular maintenance fees are discussed. This strongly indicates the building does not offer leasehold units.

The remarks were searched for leasehold terminology, land-lease expiration dates, ground-lease language, and lease extensions. No specific lease-expiry year was found, so the value remains unknown.

Direct remarks confirm VA approval and VA financing-related eligibility. This is strong, repeated evidence that VA financing is accepted.

Generic insurance references appear in the remarks, including insurance as an HOA-covered expense and an available insurance schedule. These statements do not establish that the HOA provides full or walls-in coverage.

A minority of MLS records (2 of 14) show the fire sprinkler amenity checked, but no listing remarks reference sprinklers or a fire suppression system. Given the inconsistency and lack of textual support, the building is unlikely to have a sprinkler system.

The remarks were searched for terms such as 'FLSE passed,' 'fire safety certified,' 'life safety compliant,' and 'passed fire inspection.' None were found, so there is insufficient evidence to establish that the building has passed an FLSE.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Multiple listings describe direct ocean views, including penthouses and mid‑floor units, with phrases like 'breathtaking ocean views', 'sunset ocean views', and 'peek-a-boo views of the Pacific Ocean'. MLS view data (4/14 with OCEAN and 0 with NONE) supports that ocean-view units are a known feature of this building. Buyers seeking ocean views would find suitable units here.

Mountain views are repeatedly described across the remarks, including “majestic Koolau Mountain views,” “sweeping views of the Ala Wai Canal and Koolau Mountains,” and multiple references to mountain views from lanais. The evidence appears across many distinct units and is consistent with the 13/15 current MLS records.

Several listings emphasize Diamond Head, including 'partial Diamond Head', 'largest Diamond Head-facing 2 bedroom layout', and 'Living room is Facing to Ocean with Diamond Head and City Views'. A penthouse listing also highlights 'OCEAN, DIAMOND HEAD & MOUNTAIN VIEWS'. Together with substantial MLS checkbox use, this confirms Diamond Head views are available in this building.

Several listings explicitly mention city views, including “Ocean & City View,” “Diamond Head, ocean, and city lights views,” and “Diamond Head and City Views.” These remarks span multiple units, supporting the building-level feature rather than a single isolated claim.

Several units, particularly penthouses and ocean-facing corners, are described with expansive ocean views near the shoreline, suggesting that the beachline itself is visible from some angles. A small number of agents have specifically checked COASTL in MLS, indicating coastline or shoreline vistas. This is inferred from MLS and context rather than frequent explicit wording in remarks.

Several agents have selected GARDEN as a view type in the MLS, implying outlooks over landscaped or courtyard spaces, likely around the pool/amenity areas. While remarks focus more on ocean, mountain, and canal views, the repeated MLS checkbox usage indicates that at least some units offer garden or courtyard-style views. Buyers looking for greener outlooks should consider certain stacks here.

The remarks include “mountain and Ala Wai golf course views” and “a very beautiful Ala Wai Canal & Golf course View.” Additional listings reference the nearby Ala Wai Golf Course, and the direct view descriptions across multiple units support inclusion.

Marina-related views are documented as “sweeping views of the Ala Wai Canal,” “mountain, and canal views,” and “watching sailboats drift by.” Multiple listings also identify Ala Wai Canal views directly, providing strong evidence that the building offers marina or canal-facing units.

The supplied remarks do not frequently use the exact phrase “sunrise view,” but several describe preferred Diamond Head-facing units and the Diamond Head side of Waikiki, consistent with morning/eastern exposure. Combined with 3/15 current MLS records containing SUNRIS, this supports inclusion with moderate rather than high confidence.

A penthouse description invites residents to 'soak in the gorgeous sunset ocean views', clearly documenting sunset exposure from at least one stack. Given the building's Waikiki location and this explicit marketing, sunset views are a real and marketable feature for some units. MLS view selections are consistent with this evidence.

Across numerous listings, agents highlight ocean, mountain, Diamond Head, city, canal, golf course, pool, and garden-type views, but there is no mention of cemetery views. MLS view data likewise shows zero entries for cemetery. This strongly suggests that cemetery views are not a feature of this building.

I searched for mentions of fireworks views, Friday night shows, or watching fireworks from the lanai/unit and found none. Given that many view types are described in detail without mentioning fireworks, it's somewhat likely the building does not notably feature fireworks views. However, absence of mention is not definitive, so confidence is moderate.

No analysis available

The collected listings are detailed about views, parking, AC, rental minimums, and amenities but completely silent on pets. Since there is no explicit 'pets allowed' or 'no pets' language in remarks or MLS restriction codes, the building’s pet policy remains uncertain and pets_allowed is not supported by current evidence.

At least 1 of 15 current listings explicitly mentions a site manager, stating that the maintenance fee "INCLUDES ALL ELECTRICITY, water, sewer, trash, site manager and amenities." This directly confirms the historical high-confidence evidence of on-site management; the additional "well-managed building" language is supportive but less specific.

Listings describe conventional owner-occupant and long-term-use features, including VA financing and a 6‑month minimum rental period, which are inconsistent with hotel-style nightly rentals. With no textual or MLS architectural-style indication of hotel operations, the building is best classified as a regular condominium, not a condotel.

The building is repeatedly referred to and marketed as a condominium with typical condo-style maintenance fees and VA loan eligibility, with no mention of shares or co-op ownership structures. Both narrative remarks and MLS fee coding strongly support that this is not a cooperative building.