Lehua Manor
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Lehua Manor
Building Overview
Lehua Manor in Aliamanu-Salt Lake: 1973 concrete building with a pool and on-site resident manager.
About Lehua Manor
Lehua Manor is located in the Aliamanu-Salt Lake neighborhood and was built in 1973. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete. Size or unit counts are not specified in the MLS-derived data provided.
Based on MLS data, on-site amenities include a swimming pool and a resident manager. No other common-area amenities are listed in the available records.
Parking is available and assigned. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS data. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. This information is based on MLS data analysis; buyers should verify building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Several public remarks explicitly report the building is 77% owner-occupied (e.g., 'with an owner-occupancy rate of 77%', 'impressive 77% owner occupancy'). Because the current stored value is 77.00 and the remarks corroborate it explicitly, the numeric value is kept with high confidence.
Remarks clearly indicate elevator access and a 'semi-private' elevator serving two units per floor, but no explicit number of elevators is provided in any public remark. Searched for explicit phrases such as '4 elevators', 'two elevators', 'multiple elevators' and numeric elevator counts; none were found. Because the dataset has no prior elevator value and no explicit count is given, the number is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Listings clearly state an assigned/reserved/dedicated parking stall for the unit, but there is no explicit statement that the stall is deeded or included in the deed. Absence of 'deeded' language leads to a conclusion of not deeded.
No analysis available
Remarks reference an assigned parking stall but do not mention any parking fee or monthly parking charge. Therefore no parking fee is indicated in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No evidence of a parking waitlist system in the public remarks; listings simply reference an assigned/reserved stall for the unit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks do not indicate that short-term rentals are permitted. In absence of explicit allowance language, STR is considered not allowed based on the remarks.
There is no mention of a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed program, and since short-term rentals are not indicated as allowed, hotel-pool participation is false.
No evidence that units must participate in a mandatory hotel rental pool, and because STRs are not indicated as allowed, mandatory pool is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no information about land tenure or a lease expiry year in the remarks. Unable to extract a lease expiry year from the provided text.
Public remarks do not reference VA loan approval or VA financing. Absence of any VA-related language suggests the listing does not indicate VA approval.
I searched the remarks for insurance-related phrases (e.g., 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', 'comprehensive building insurance') and found no statements indicating HOA provides full/walls-in insurance. With no explicit mention and no prior data, the default is false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'fire inspection passed', and related terms but found no references. With no explicit mention and no existing data, the default assumption is false with medium confidence (absence likely indicates no claim in remarks).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.