Lanikea at Waikiki

Both MLS data (20/20 listings) and multiple remarks ('Luxury & comfortable condo built in 2005', 'Constructed in 2005', 'Built in 2005') consistently indicate the building was completed in 2005. There are no conflicting dates mentioned, giving very high confidence in 2005 as the construction year.

MLS property data for this building shows unit floors as high as 31 (with numerous high-floor and penthouse listings), and no remarks indicate floors above that level. Although one remark mentions 'only 4 residences/floor' without a total floor count, the highest observed floor number strongly suggests a 31-story building. Taken together, the evidence supports 31 floors with good confidence.

A listing description notes that there are 'only 4 residences/floor and 100 in the entire building,' providing a clear total unit count. No other remarks contradict this figure, so 100 units is adopted as the building total.

Searched remarks for explicit owner-occupancy phrases and numeric statements; none found. Per numeric-field rules, keep the current value when remarks provide no evidence; confidence is low.

Searched all public remarks for explicit elevator counts (e.g., '4 elevators', 'two elevators', 'multiple elevators'). Found mentions of elevator FOBs and phrases like 'Ascend to your high floor' but no explicit count. Per rules, retain current numeric value when no explicit number is present; confidence is low.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Multiple listings and remarks explicitly mention 'central AC' or 'central air' (e.g., 'Luxury condo... with central AC', 'Rare... Luxury furnished with central AC'), and 6 of 20 current MLS entries have ACCEN checked. Evidence is consistent across different agent remarks and aligns with prior high confidence that units/building provide central air.

MLS data shows 15 of 20 current listings tick CABTV indicating cable is included in the association fee. Public remarks across listings do not explicitly discuss cable billing (no contradictions), and prior data also showed most listings listing cable included, so evidence is strong across MLS entries.

10 of 20 MLS listings currently checked OTCOEX and many public remarks repeatedly describe common, building-operated amenities ("24-hour security", "lobby", "elevators", "pool/jacuzzi"), which implies the association covers common-area electric costs. Multiple agents consistently describe these building services, supporting inclusion.

All remarks describe Lanikea at Waikiki as a condominium built in 2005, and there is no mention of any co‑op structure or co‑op tax. With no MLS indication of COOTAX, cooperative taxes are not part of the maintenance fees.

Across all provided remarks, utilities included are never highlighted as a selling point, and electric service is not checked as included in any recent MLS data. This strongly indicates that individual units are billed for their own electricity outside the HOA dues.

There is no mention of gas appliances, gas lines, or gas utilities in either remarks or MLS fee‑includes fields. Given that no listing flags gas as included, gas is almost certainly not an HOA‑covered utility here.

Only 4 of 20 MLS entries list HOTWAT while 12 of 20 explicitly list WTRHTR (unit water heater), and none of the public remarks claim building-supplied hot water is included. The predominance of unit water heaters across listings strongly indicates hot water is not provided via the association fee.

12 of 20 current MLS listings show INTSER indicating internet service is included in the association fee for a substantial subset of units. Public remarks do not explicitly confirm or deny internet included, so the evidence relies mainly on MLS checkboxes and is moderately strong but not independently corroborated in remarks.

Lanikea at Waikiki is presented purely as a luxury residential tower in central Waikiki, not a waterfront marina property. With no MLS or narrative reference to a marina, marina fees or access are not part of the HOA dues.

Nearly all current MLS entries (19 of 20) explicitly include sewer in association_fee_includes. Public remarks do not dispute sewer coverage; the checkbox consistency across listings provides strong evidence that sewer is included in the maintenance fee.

All 20 current MLS listings have WATER checked in association_fee_includes. This uniform checkbox across all entries, reinforced by prior high confidence, indicates water is included in the association fee for the building.

Strong, consistent evidence that the building offers BBQ facilities: the MLS currently shows BBQ checked in all 20 listings and many public remarks explicitly mention "BBQ area", "BBQ park", "BBQ areas", "gas BBQs" or "barbecue area". At least ~18 listings in the provided remarks reference BBQ/grill amenities (examples: "pool, BBQ area in gated, secured private residence", "beautiful BBQ park", "gas BBQs and spacious picnic area"), indicating the feature is widespread and not an isolated or single-unit claim.

No listings (0/20) mark bike storage in the MLS amenities, and none of the many detailed remarks mention a bike room, bicycle storage, or bike racks, despite extensively listing other amenities like pool, jacuzzi, BBQ, EV charging, car wash, dog area, guest parking, and storage lockers. This consistent omission across agents and listings indicates that Lanikea at Waikiki does not provide dedicated bicycle storage as a building amenity.

Units are promoted for proximity to Waikiki Beach, Fort DeRussy Park, and urban amenities rather than boat mooring or marina facilities. The total lack of mention of docks or slips strongly supports that there is no boat dock associated with the building.

Moderate evidence: MLS checkboxes include car wash on multiple listings (8/20) and the public remarks include a specific phrase "car wash space." Mentions are not ubiquitous across all agent remarks, but present enough to include the amenity as available to some residents.

While the building has a lobby and landscaped resort-style grounds, agents do not describe any dedicated clubhouse or community center. The consistent omission in detailed amenity lists and 0/20 MLS entries indicates there is no clubhouse facility.

While one listing mentions a 'welcoming lobby with friendly staff', none explicitly describe concierge or front-desk services, and this is not supported in any MLS amenity data. The overall evidence points to security staff but not a dedicated concierge service.

Moderate evidence: MLS has dog-park checked in 3/20 listings and one listing's remarks explicitly reference a "dog area"; several other remarks note the building is pet-friendly. Evidence suggests a shared dog area exists, but mentions are limited across listings so confidence is implied rather than definitive.

Listings consistently highlight 24-hour security but never mention a doorman or lobby attendant, which agents typically promote when present. Given the complete absence of such references and MLS omitting the doorman amenity, a staffed doorman service is very unlikely.

Across all remarks, amenities are consistently described as pool, spa/jacuzzi, BBQ areas, landscaped grounds, EV charging, dog area, and car wash, with no reference to any fitness or exercise facility. Combined with 0/20 MLS checkbox entries, this strongly indicates there is no building exercise room.

Although positioned as a luxury boutique building, marketing focuses on physical amenities (pool, spa, BBQ, security, parking) and location, not services like limousine or house car service. The complete lack of references makes it very likely no limo or courtesy car service is provided.

Descriptions focus on residential features and outdoor amenities, without any reference to community or board rooms. The absence in both MLS and remarks strongly suggests the building does not offer a shared meeting room.

Building-level outdoor spaces are well-documented: roughly 17 of the recent listing remarks explicitly mention a lanai/covered lanai (quotes include 'private lanai', 'covered lanai', and 'large lanai'). Multiple different listings and agents describe the unit having a lanai or balcony and the building amenities consistently reference pool/BBQ areas with outdoor lounge space — evidence is strong and consistent across many listings rather than a single copy-paste error.

Agents market walkability to nearby Waikiki attractions and outdoor spaces but do not describe any dedicated jogging or walking paths within the project itself. With 0/20 MLS entries and no textual indication, the building appears not to offer an internal jogging path.

Outdoor features are consistently described as pool, spa/jacuzzi, BBQ areas, lawns, and landscaped gardens, without any reference to play structures or children's playgrounds. This sustained omission across many listings suggests there is no playground amenity.

No listing remarks (0 out of 20) describe a private or fenced yard—remarks repeatedly reference shared grounds: "lush landscaping," "BBQ park," "pool," and a building "dog area." The PRIYAR checkbox appears in 2/20 current listings but without any supporting text; given prior high-confidence analysis that outdoors are shared, the evidence indicates the building does not offer private yard space. The 2 checkbox instances likely reflect agent copy/paste errors rather than a real change.

Although some units have views toward the Ala Wai Golf Course, no listing claims an on-site putting green or golf facility. The total absence in both checkbox data and narrative remarks makes it very likely that the building does not have a putting green.

Moderately strong evidence: 8/20 listings have recreation area checked and many remarks describe shared recreation spaces — 'spacious picnic area', 'lawn', 'resort-like pool area', and 'multiple seating and barbecue areas' — indicating a communal recreation/amenity area used by residents.

Agents highlight lobby, pool/spa, BBQ areas, lawns, and parking/storage, but never mention an interior recreation or game room. With 0/20 MLS checkboxes, this strongly suggests there is no shared recreation room.

Multiple remarks highlight that the building is 'close to shops, restaurants, activities' and 'near-endless options for dining' in the surrounding area, but none state an in-building restaurant or café. This pattern strongly indicates there is no restaurant within the condominium complex.

Agents emphasize views from private lanais but attribute amenities to the 'resort-like pool and spa, BBQ, and lawn' at ground level. With 0/20 rooftop amenity checkboxes and no textual references, the building appears not to have shared rooftop amenities.

While listings emphasize a jacuzzi/whirlpool and resort-style pool, none add a sauna or steam room to the list of amenities. This consistent omission in detailed amenity descriptions indicates the building does not have a sauna.

Building-level and unit-level storage is supported by MLS checkbox data (12/20 listings list storage in amenities; 4/20 list storage in unit features) and by multiple public remarks. At least six separate listings explicitly state storage-related items—phrases include "storage in the secured garage," "large storage unit," "storage for luggage and files," and "storage lockers above the...parking stalls"—showing consistent, cross-agent confirmation that storage/lockers are available.

Searched remarks for "surfboard storage", "board storage", "surf storage", or combined bike/surf storage. Found only generic storage references; no explicit surfboard storage facility is mentioned.

Amenities are repeatedly outlined (pool, spa/jacuzzi, BBQ areas, lawns, dog area, car wash, EV charging), but tennis courts are never mentioned. Given the complete absence in both MLS checkboxes and remarks, the building very likely has no tennis court.

Strong MLS evidence: all current listings (20/20) have trash chute selected and historical data rated high confidence. Public remarks do not frequently cite "trash chute" explicitly, but the uniform MLS amenity selection across agents indicates a building-level trash chute/refuse system is present.

Listings repeatedly highlight “2 covered parking stalls,” “secured garage,” “guest parking,” and EV charging, but never refer to valet service. The combination of self-parking descriptions and the complete absence of valet terminology makes it very likely that valet is not offered in this building.

One listing calls the property a 'fully gated compound' with 'gated guest parking', and another notes 'gated entry to the building and parking', indicating a controlled, fenced/gated perimeter. MLS amenities partially reflect this, supporting that the property is enclosed by gates or walls.

Strong evidence: MLS lists whirlpool on many units (16/20) and multiple public remarks explicitly reference "jacuzzi", "hot tub", or "whirlpool" with the pool area. The feature is repeatedly described across different listings, indicating a shared spa/hot tub amenity at the property.

Strong, consistent evidence that the building has a pool: all 20 MLS listings flag POOL and numerous public remarks confirm it (quotes include "beautifully landscaped pool area," "resort-style heated pool/whirlpool," and "sparkling pool, jacuzzi"). Mentions come from multiple agents/listings and consistently describe shared pool and spa/whirlpool amenities, indicating the feature is building-level and widely advertised.

Several independent remarks clearly state the building has a heated pool, including phrases like 'resort like heated pool and jacuzzi', 'Amenities include heated pool, whirlpool and BBQ area', and 'Surrounded by lush garden and large heated pool'. MLS amenities also show a heated-pool code on 7 of 20 listings, aligning with these descriptions. This repeated, explicit language provides strong evidence that the building’s common pool is heated.

Searched public remarks for terms like "salt water pool", "saltwater", "salt pool", or "saline". None were found, so there is no evidence the pool is saltwater.

Strong building-level evidence: MLS property data indicates 20/20 current listings include washer/dryer, and multiple public remarks explicitly state in-unit laundry (quotes: "washer and dryer in 2022", "full-size stackable washer and dryer", "washer/dryer"). Evidence is consistent across listings and agents, indicating some units in the building have in-unit laundry.

Across all provided listings, there are no mentions of a shared laundry room, coin laundry, or community laundry facilities. Instead, the focus is on in-unit washer/dryer, and MLS amenities data shows 0/20 listings with community laundry checked, so this building should not be represented as having community laundry.

Searched remarks for "coin laundry", "coin-op", "quarters", "paid laundry", or "card operated". No references found to paid/coin-operated community laundry in the public remarks.

Searched public remarks for phrases like "laundry on each floor", "laundry room on every floor", or "floor-by-floor laundry". Found no such language; listings consistently reference in-unit washers/dryers rather than community laundry on each floor.

Every listing in the current MLS set indicates parking, and multiple remarks reference '2 parking stalls' or 'two parking spaces' per unit. This is consistent across different stacks and penthouses, confirming that the building provides on-site parking for residents.

Strong evidence that the building offers assigned parking: MLS checkboxes show 16/20 listings with ASSIGN and at least half a dozen remarks explicitly note assigned or dedicated stalls (quotes: "2 assigned covered parking spaces", "Two covered and secured parking spaces"). Mentions come from multiple listings/agents and align with the MLS data.

Very strong and consistent evidence for covered parking: all 20 listings' checkboxes indicate covered/garage parking and multiple remarks mention covered stalls or garage (quotes: "2 covered standard parking stalls", "secured garage"). Coverage is consistent across agents and listings.

The listings consistently mention two assigned/covered parking stalls (e.g., '2 covered standard parking stalls and storage in the secured garage' and 'Two covered and secured parking spaces are included'), but none of the public remarks explicitly state that parking is deeded/owned. Determination of deeded status requires explicit wording in the remarks or condominium documents, which is not present here.

One listing notes a 'fully gated compound' that includes 'EV charging, car wash space', and another says 'With EV charging station'. These explicit, detailed remarks by different agents provide strong evidence that the building has EV charging despite the unchecked MLS box.

I searched for terms like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking charge', or 'parking rental' and found none. The remarks describe assigned/included parking stalls but do not specify any parking fee amount.

Solid evidence that guest parking is available: 17/20 listings marked GUEST and multiple remarks call out guest parking (quotes: "12 guest parking spaces", "easy access gated guest parking", "rare plentiful guest parking"). Evidence appears across several listings and agents.

Good evidence that parking/entry is secured: 13/20 listings have SECENT checked and multiple remarks mention secure or gated entry and building security (quotes: "gated, secured private residence", "FOBs", "gated entry to the building and parking"). Evidence is repeated across listings.

Where configuration is mentioned, agents describe 'standard' and 'side-by-side' parking stalls, which contrasts with tandem layouts. With zero MLS tandem flags and no remarks suggesting tandem, it is very likely the building does not offer tandem parking stalls.

Amenities are consistently described as self-park with assigned and guest stalls, not valet service. The complete absence of any 'valet' or 'attended parking' language in remarks or MLS fields indicates the building does not provide valet parking.

I looked for phrases such as 'parking waitlist', 'parking waiting list', or 'join waitlist for parking' and found no mentions. The remarks reference assigned stalls and guest parking but do not indicate a waitlist system.

A remark notes that there are 'floor-specific elevator FOBs', which is explicit evidence of keyed/fob elevator security. Even though MLS ELEVAT is 0/20, the specific description of floor-restricted elevator access is strong proof this feature exists.

Public remarks explicitly mention floor-specific elevator FOBs and secure/gated entry, confirming electronic card/fob access for the building.

Strong evidence that the building provides on-site security: historical MLS data listed SECGUA in 18 of 20 listings, and current public remarks in at least 12 separate listings explicitly state security features (e.g., "24-hour security", "24-7 security", "round the clock security", "secure entry"). Mentions are consistent across multiple agent listings and describe building-level security rather than a single unit feature, so confidence is high.

Searched for "security patrol", "roving security", "patrol service", and similar phrases. Found no explicit reference to a security patrol; listings emphasize on-site/gated security and 24-hour security staff instead.

Across all provided remarks, there are no references to security cameras or video surveillance, even though security is otherwise heavily marketed. With MLS also consistently omitting SECSYS, it is very likely the building does not have a distinct video security system as a marketed amenity.

High confidence that the building has central air conditioning: 17/20 current MLS unit_feature checkboxes and 19/20 inclusions historically indicated ACCEN/CENAC, and at least four separate public remarks explicitly reference 'central AC' or 'quiet central AC when needed'. Mentions appear across multiple listings/agents and align with the strong historical checkbox data, so the evidence is consistent and robust.

Across all the remarks, there are no references to split, mini-split, or ductless AC, while central AC is repeatedly highlighted instead. MLS data also shows 0/20 listings checking the split AC inclusion code, suggesting agents do not recognize split systems as a feature here. This consistent absence strongly indicates that split AC systems are not present in this building’s units.

Listings emphasize central AC and never mention window or wall-mounted AC units, even in detailed renovation and feature descriptions. MLS checkbox data likewise shows no window AC inclusions across 20 listings. This consistent lack of any reference supports the conclusion that window AC units are not a feature of this building.

All 20 available MLS listings for this building indicate concrete construction (CONCRE), providing unanimous checklist data. Public remarks across listings do not explicitly state 'concrete' but also do not contradict the MLS entries; the consistent 20/20 checkbox across multiple agents is strong evidence the building is concrete.

8 of 20 recent MLS listings list double-wall construction (DOUWAL), but none of the public remarks mention double-wall construction and reporting is inconsistent across listings. Previously flagged with high confidence, the evidence is now mixed—some MLS records include it, but it's not corroborated in agent remarks.

Hollow tile construction is never mentioned, and no listing checks the hollow tile box in MLS. For a 2005 luxury high-rise, hollow tile as a primary construction type is improbable.

Most listings (12 of 20) mark masonry/stucco construction, indicating this is the commonly understood exterior system for the building. Descriptions of the architecture and lushly landscaped resort-style grounds are consistent with a stucco-clad masonry high-rise rather than another exterior type.

9 of 20 recent MLS listings include steel frame (STEFRA) in construction_materials. Public remarks for the building do not mention steel frame explicitly, suggesting mixed reporting or partial use; the MLS checkbox evidence is moderate across multiple agents but not corroborated in remarks.

A small number of listings flag slab construction, and nothing in the remarks contradicts a slab foundation. Considering standard practice for high-rise towers of this era, it is reasonably likely the building is constructed on a concrete slab foundation despite under-reporting in MLS checkboxes.

No analysis available

No listing indicates wood frame construction in the MLS data, and remarks consistently describe a modern high-rise concrete-style luxury building. Given the building type and age, wood frame construction can be confidently ruled out.

Only 3 of 20 recent MLS records indicate 'above ground' construction, while none of the public remarks refer to a raised/post-and-pier or above-ground structural style. Given the consistent depiction of a 2005 concrete luxury tower and the lack of any textual confirmation, the above-ground flag appears to be erroneous and is not supported by the listing remarks.

No MLS record indicates brick construction and there are no references to brick in the public remarks. The building is described instead as a tropical/Hawaiian-themed luxury tower, making brick construction very unlikely.

No listings mark or mention single wall construction, and the building’s age and type make this construction method effectively impossible here. This feature can be confidently excluded for this property.

The public remarks explicitly note the building 'allows 30 days rental.' A 30-day minimum rental policy means short-term (transient/vacation) rentals are disallowed, so STRs are not allowed in this building per the remarks.

Because the building enforces a 30-day minimum (excluding STRs) and the remarks contain no references to a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed rental program, there is no evidence the building participates in a hotel rental pool.

With short-term rentals disallowed and no remarks indicating any hotel rental program—mandatory or optional—there is no evidence of a mandatory hotel rental pool program in these remarks.

Across all supplied public remarks, there are no mentions of 'fee simple' ownership or equivalent phrases, and the land_tenure summary does not show any FS flags. Because of this lack of evidence, the existence of fee simple units in this building cannot be confirmed and is treated as not established.

None of the listing remarks refer to 'leasehold', land leases, lease rent, or lease expiry dates, and the land_tenure summary does not show any LH entries. In the absence of any explicit leasehold evidence, the presence of leasehold units in this building remains unconfirmed.

I searched the remarks for leasehold phrases and explicit years (e.g., 'lease expires 2050', 'land lease to 2065', 'leasehold expiring in 2040') and found no such references. Because no lease expiry year is mentioned, the expiry is unknown from the public remarks.

I searched the public remarks for explicit phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. Without an explicit statement in the remarks, VA approval cannot be assumed.

Searched all public remarks for terms indicating HOA/walls-in or comprehensive building insurance and found no matches. Absence of any explicit insurance wording leads to a default false with medium-low confidence.

Historical MLS checkbox data indicates 9 of 20 listings list FIRSPR and prior historical confidence was High. Current remarks in at least one listing explicitly state "Worry Free Fire Sprinkler System Installed throughout Building," corroborating the checkbox data. Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and reinforced by explicit agent remarks, supporting a high-confidence inclusion of this building-level feature.

Searched for phrases like 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'passed fire inspection' and found none. While sprinklers are mentioned, there is no explicit FLSE/pass statement in remarks, so the field is set to false with medium-low confidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are commonly promoted for Lanikea at Waikiki (10 of 20 current listings note OCEAN). Remarks repeatedly state phrases like 'ocean view', 'Pacific Ocean', 'Enjoy the OCEAN VIEW from the lanai', and 'sweeping ocean...'. Evidence is strong across multiple agent listings and consistent with historical high confidence.

Mountain views are regularly noted with 7 of 20 current listings describing mountain or Ko'olau views. Phrases such as "mountain view," "green Ko'olau Mountains," and "views of ocean and mountain" appear across multiple listings, supporting inclusion.

Although the public remarks rarely spell out 'Diamond Head view,' multiple MLS entries explicitly mark Diamond Head as a view. The reference to units on the 'Diamond Head(East) side' further supports that some stacks enjoy Diamond Head views, making this a reasonable building-level feature.

City views are widely advertised for this building (12 of 20 current listings note CITY). Multiple remarks call out 'city views', 'city lights', and 'Honolulu cityscape', indicating consistent, building-level availability of city-view units across several listings and agents.

High-floor corner units are described as having 'unobstructed ocean/coastline' views, indicating a clear view of the shoreline, not just open water. Together with multiple MLS agents selecting COASTLINE, this confirms that coastline views are available in the building.

Several descriptions emphasize greenery and landscaped vistas, including views over Ft. DeRussy’s park-like grounds and the building’s own lush gardens. Even though only one MLS record checks GARDEN, the narrative evidence shows that garden/park-style views are a real feature for certain units.

At least one unit clearly overlooks the Ala Wai Golf Course, and multiple MLS entries corroborate golf course views. This indicates that golf course views are available from some units in the building.

Direct 'marina' or 'harbor' views are not emphasized in the narrative remarks, but several MLS agents have selected the marina/canal view option. Given the location near the Ala Wai Canal and repeated MLS coding, it is likely that some units enjoy canal or related marina views.

Sunrise/morning views are noted in a smaller subset (3 of 20) but explicitly mentioned with terms like "morning sunlight" and references to the Diamond Head (east) side and enjoying morning coffee on the lanai. Evidence is consistent enough across listings to include the feature.

Sunset/evening views are called out in several listings (4 of 20 current listings note SUNSET). Remarks include direct phrases such as 'beautiful sunset', 'sunset & fireworks by Hilton Hotel', and 'enjoy the beautiful Hawaiian sunset from your balcony', supporting that some units offer sunset/western-facing views.

All marketing materials focus on ocean, park, city, mountain, and golf course views, with no indication of a cemetery nearby or in the sightline. Given the consistent absence of cemetery references and MLS checks, it is highly unlikely that any units have cemetery views.

Several listings explicitly note that Friday night fireworks from the Hilton can be seen from the unit/building (e.g., 'fireworks by Hilton Hotel every Friday night'), confirming a fireworks view from the property.

No analysis available

At least 4 of 20 listings clearly describe the building as pet friendly and one specifies it allows “2 Cats / Dogs or Other Household Pets,” with another noting a “dog area” on the grounds. The consistent, explicit pet-friendly language from different agents confirms that pets (cats and dogs) are allowed in this building.

Most MLS entries (13 of 20) currently indicate a resident/on-site manager and multiple public remarks explicitly state 'an onsite manager' or reference friendly/welcoming lobby staff and 24-hour security. The repeated mentions across different agent remarks suggest a building-level on-site manager presence rather than isolated copy/paste, giving strong support for including this feature.

The building is consistently marketed as a residential luxury condo, not as a hotel or condo-hotel, and the only rental-related reference is to a 30-day minimum. With no mention of hotel operations, rental pools, or front-desk management in any of the 20 listings, it is very unlikely that this is a condotel property.

All 20 listings describe Lanikea at Waikiki as a condominium, and none use “co-op,” “cooperative,” or share-based ownership language. Combined with the absence of any COOTAX flags in MLS data, this supports that the building is not a cooperative.