Lanikea at Waikiki

Both MLS data (20/20 listings) and multiple remarks ('Luxury & comfortable condo built in 2005', 'Constructed in 2005', 'Built in 2005') consistently indicate the building was completed in 2005. There are no conflicting dates mentioned, giving very high confidence in 2005 as the construction year.

The MLS lists penthouse PH-3 on floor 31, with a matching highest floor-field value. County and state records report 30 floors, which is set aside because the penthouse listing establishes the top residential floor.

The county reconciled unit count and the state registration both report 131 units, and the parcel has one building sharing it. The stored value is supported by these independent records.

Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 5036. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.

The remarks were searched for explicit counts such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators." None were found. The current value of 2 is retained with low confidence because there is no evidence in the remarks to confirm or deny it.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Multiple listings and remarks explicitly mention 'central AC' or 'central air' (e.g., 'Luxury condo... with central AC', 'Rare... Luxury furnished with central AC'), and 6 of 20 current MLS entries have ACCEN checked. Evidence is consistent across different agent remarks and aligns with prior high confidence that units/building provide central air.

Cable TV is marked as included in 15 of 20 current MLS listings, making this strong building-level evidence. None of the provided remarks explicitly mention cable, so the conclusion relies primarily on the repeated MLS inclusion pattern rather than agent narrative.

Common-area electricity is included on 12 of 20 current MLS listings, a moderate and repeated pattern. The remarks describe extensive building-managed common areas and amenities, but no listing explicitly states that common electric is included, so some checkbox copying is possible.

All remarks describe Lanikea at Waikiki as a condominium built in 2005, and there is no mention of any co‑op structure or co‑op tax. With no MLS indication of COOTAX, cooperative taxes are not part of the maintenance fees.

Across all provided remarks, utilities included are never highlighted as a selling point, and electric service is not checked as included in any recent MLS data. This strongly indicates that individual units are billed for their own electricity outside the HOA dues.

There is no mention of gas appliances, gas lines, or gas utilities in either remarks or MLS fee‑includes fields. Given that no listing flags gas as included, gas is almost certainly not an HOA‑covered utility here.

Hot water should remain excluded because HOTWAT appears in only 4 of 20 listings, while WTRHTR appears in 12 of 20. No public remarks explicitly say hot water is included, and the stronger water-heater pattern supports correcting or maintaining the false value.

Internet service is listed as included in 12 of 20 current MLS records, which is moderate evidence that the building offers it. None of the remarks explicitly mention internet or Wi-Fi, so the pattern may partly reflect copied MLS selections.

Lanikea at Waikiki is presented purely as a luxury residential tower in central Waikiki, not a waterfront marina property. With no MLS or narrative reference to a marina, marina fees or access are not part of the HOA dues.

Sewer inclusion is exceptionally well supported, with 19 of 20 listings marking SEWER. Although no remarks explicitly quote sewer inclusion, the consistency across nearly all listings makes this strong building-level evidence.

Water is included across all 20 current MLS listings, providing unanimous evidence for the feature. The remarks do not explicitly mention water inclusion, but the complete agreement in MLS data is stronger than the absence of narrative confirmation.

At least 18 of the 20 listing remarks explicitly mention BBQ or barbecue facilities, including phrases such as "BBQ area," "beautiful BBQ park," "gas BBQ area with seating and tables," and "BBQs and picnic area." The consistent references across many listings and agents strongly confirm a shared building amenity rather than an isolated or copied checkbox error.

No listings (0/20) mark bike storage in the MLS amenities, and none of the many detailed remarks mention a bike room, bicycle storage, or bike racks, despite extensively listing other amenities like pool, jacuzzi, BBQ, EV charging, car wash, dog area, guest parking, and storage lockers. This consistent omission across agents and listings indicates that Lanikea at Waikiki does not provide dedicated bicycle storage as a building amenity.

Units are promoted for proximity to Waikiki Beach, Fort DeRussy Park, and urban amenities rather than boat mooring or marina facilities. The total lack of mention of docks or slips strongly supports that there is no boat dock associated with the building.

Moderate evidence: MLS checkboxes include car wash on multiple listings (8/20) and the public remarks include a specific phrase "car wash space." Mentions are not ubiquitous across all agent remarks, but present enough to include the amenity as available to some residents.

While the building has a lobby and landscaped resort-style grounds, agents do not describe any dedicated clubhouse or community center. The consistent omission in detailed amenity lists and 0/20 MLS entries indicates there is no clubhouse facility.

While one listing mentions a 'welcoming lobby with friendly staff', none explicitly describe concierge or front-desk services, and this is not supported in any MLS amenity data. The overall evidence points to security staff but not a dedicated concierge service.

Moderate evidence: MLS has dog-park checked in 3/20 listings and one listing's remarks explicitly reference a "dog area"; several other remarks note the building is pet-friendly. Evidence suggests a shared dog area exists, but mentions are limited across listings so confidence is implied rather than definitive.

Listings consistently highlight 24-hour security but never mention a doorman or lobby attendant, which agents typically promote when present. Given the complete absence of such references and MLS omitting the doorman amenity, a staffed doorman service is very unlikely.

Across all remarks, amenities are consistently described as pool, spa/jacuzzi, BBQ areas, landscaped grounds, EV charging, dog area, and car wash, with no reference to any fitness or exercise facility. Combined with 0/20 MLS checkbox entries, this strongly indicates there is no building exercise room.

Although positioned as a luxury boutique building, marketing focuses on physical amenities (pool, spa, BBQ, security, parking) and location, not services like limousine or house car service. The complete lack of references makes it very likely no limo or courtesy car service is provided.

Descriptions focus on residential features and outdoor amenities, without any reference to community or board rooms. The absence in both MLS and remarks strongly suggests the building does not offer a shared meeting room.

Patio/deck outdoor space is strongly supported across many independent listings, with at least 17 remarks mentioning a lanai or covered lanai. Key phrases include “private lanai,” “large sheltered lanai,” “covered lanai,” and “full lanai,” indicating the feature is broadly available in the building rather than a copy-paste-only checkbox.

Agents market walkability to nearby Waikiki attractions and outdoor spaces but do not describe any dedicated jogging or walking paths within the project itself. With 0/20 MLS entries and no textual indication, the building appears not to offer an internal jogging path.

Outdoor features are consistently described as pool, spa/jacuzzi, BBQ areas, lawns, and landscaped gardens, without any reference to play structures or children's playgrounds. This sustained omission across many listings suggests there is no playground amenity.

No listing remarks (0 out of 20) describe a private or fenced yard—remarks repeatedly reference shared grounds: "lush landscaping," "BBQ park," "pool," and a building "dog area." The PRIYAR checkbox appears in 2/20 current listings but without any supporting text; given prior high-confidence analysis that outdoors are shared, the evidence indicates the building does not offer private yard space. The 2 checkbox instances likely reflect agent copy/paste errors rather than a real change.

Although some units have views toward the Ala Wai Golf Course, no listing claims an on-site putting green or golf facility. The total absence in both checkbox data and narrative remarks makes it very likely that the building does not have a putting green.

Evidence for a recreation area is moderate rather than explicit. Multiple remarks describe shared amenity spaces with picnic seating, lawn areas, and outdoor lounging, which supports a building-level recreation space even though the exact phrase "recreation area" is uncommon.

Agents highlight lobby, pool/spa, BBQ areas, lawns, and parking/storage, but never mention an interior recreation or game room. With 0/20 MLS checkboxes, this strongly suggests there is no shared recreation room.

Multiple remarks highlight that the building is 'close to shops, restaurants, activities' and 'near-endless options for dining' in the surrounding area, but none state an in-building restaurant or café. This pattern strongly indicates there is no restaurant within the condominium complex.

Agents emphasize views from private lanais but attribute amenities to the 'resort-like pool and spa, BBQ, and lawn' at ground level. With 0/20 rooftop amenity checkboxes and no textual references, the building appears not to have shared rooftop amenities.

While listings emphasize a jacuzzi/whirlpool and resort-style pool, none add a sauna or steam room to the list of amenities. This consistent omission in detailed amenity descriptions indicates the building does not have a sauna.

At least 6 listings explicitly mention storage, including a “large storage unit,” “storage lockers,” secured-garage storage, and “great extra storage” in the apartment and garage. The evidence appears across multiple listings and agents, and aligns with strong current MLS checkbox support at both the building and unit levels.

The remarks mention storage units, storage lockers, garage storage, and storage for luggage and files. None identify dedicated surfboard or board-storage facilities.

Amenities are repeatedly outlined (pool, spa/jacuzzi, BBQ areas, lawns, dog area, car wash, EV charging), but tennis courts are never mentioned. Given the complete absence in both MLS checkboxes and remarks, the building very likely has no tennis court.

Trash chute appears to be a consistent building feature based on MLS data, with 19 of 20 current listings checked. Public remarks do not usually call it out, but the strong checkbox pattern and prior high-confidence history support including it.

Listings repeatedly highlight “2 covered parking stalls,” “secured garage,” “guest parking,” and EV charging, but never refer to valet service. The combination of self-parking descriptions and the complete absence of valet terminology makes it very likely that valet is not offered in this building.

One listing calls the property a 'fully gated compound' with 'gated guest parking', and another notes 'gated entry to the building and parking', indicating a controlled, fenced/gated perimeter. MLS amenities partially reflect this, supporting that the property is enclosed by gates or walls.

Whirlpool/hot tub amenities are very well supported. Several listings explicitly reference "hot tub," "jacuzzi," "whirlpool," or "spa," and the MLS checkbox is also frequently selected, making this a strong building feature.

The pool is strongly validated across the building: 20 of 20 listings include pool-related MLS amenities, and at least 17 current remarks explicitly mention a pool or swimming pool. Multiple independent descriptions call it a shared, heated, resort-style, or extra-large pool, indicating consistent building-wide evidence rather than an isolated or likely copy-pasted claim.

There is solid evidence that the building's pool is heated. Several remarks explicitly say "heated pool," including phrases like "resort like heated pool and jacuzzi," "amenities include heated pool," and "beautiful lush grounds w/heated pool," appearing across multiple listings and not just a single agent remark.

A pool is repeatedly mentioned, including heated-pool descriptions, but none of the remarks identify it as saltwater. The listings mention amenities such as a heated pool, spa, jacuzzi, and whirlpool without specifying the pool type.

In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the building: 20/20 current listings include WASHER/DRYER, while remarks explicitly mention a "full-size stackable washer and dryer" and another unit with "washer/dryer" installed in 2022. Although not every listing mentions laundry, the consistent MLS data and confirmations from multiple listings make this a strong building-level feature.

Across all provided listings, there are no mentions of a shared laundry room, coin laundry, or community laundry facilities. Instead, the focus is on in-unit washer/dryer, and MLS amenities data shows 0/20 listings with community laundry checked, so this building should not be represented as having community laundry.

The remarks reference in-unit laundry appliances but do not describe shared laundry facilities. Searches for coin laundry, paid laundry, laundry fees, card-operated machines, quarters, or coin-op laundry found no evidence.

The remarks repeatedly describe washer/dryer appliances inside individual units, such as "washer / dryer in the unit" and "full-size stackable washer and dryer." No listing mentions laundry rooms or community laundry facilities on each floor.

Every listing in the current MLS set indicates parking, and multiple remarks reference '2 parking stalls' or 'two parking spaces' per unit. This is consistent across different stacks and penthouses, confirming that the building provides on-site parking for residents.

Assigned parking is strongly supported across the building: 16/20 current listings include the ASSIGN parking feature. Remarks specifically cite “2 assigned covered parking spaces,” “two dedicated parking spaces,” and included parking stalls, confirming this is not merely isolated checkbox data.

Covered parking is overwhelmingly supported, with COVERE/CO1/CO2/CO3PLUS/GARAGE indicators in 20/20 listings. Multiple remarks state “two covered and secured parking spaces,” “2 covered standard parking stalls,” and parking in a “secured garage,” confirming the building offers covered parking.

Multiple listings confirm that units commonly have two covered or secured parking spaces, including statements such as "Two covered and secured parking spaces are included" and "2 assigned covered parking spaces." However, the remarks do not establish deeded ownership of the stalls.

One listing notes a 'fully gated compound' that includes 'EV charging, car wash space', and another says 'With EV charging station'. These explicit, detailed remarks by different agents provide strong evidence that the building has EV charging despite the unchecked MLS box.

Parking is generally described as included, assigned, or provided with the units, and some listings mention guest parking. No specific monthly parking fee or additional parking charge was found, so the fee amount is unknown.

Guest parking is clearly available at the building, supported by 18/20 current listings. Remarks from multiple listings describe “12 guest parking spaces,” “easy access gated guest parking,” “guest parking,” and “rare, plentiful guest parking,” indicating a building-level amenity rather than a single-unit claim.

Secured entry and parking are strongly confirmed, with SECENT marked in 15/20 listings and repeated supporting remarks. Listings cite “gated entry to the building and parking,” “storage in the secured garage,” “fully gated compound,” and “street level secured guest parking,” supported by multiple agents and detailed descriptions.

Where configuration is mentioned, agents describe 'standard' and 'side-by-side' parking stalls, which contrasts with tandem layouts. With zero MLS tandem flags and no remarks suggesting tandem, it is very likely the building does not offer tandem parking stalls.

Amenities are consistently described as self-park with assigned and guest stalls, not valet service. The complete absence of any 'valet' or 'attended parking' language in remarks or MLS fields indicates the building does not provide valet parking.

The listings describe assigned, covered, secured, guest, and plentiful parking, including multiple references to two parking spaces. They do not mention any building parking waitlist system.

A remark notes that there are 'floor-specific elevator FOBs', which is explicit evidence of keyed/fob elevator security. Even though MLS ELEVAT is 0/20, the specific description of floor-restricted elevator access is strong proof this feature exists.

The explicit reference to floor-specific elevator FOBs supports a card or fob-based security access system. Other remarks also describe gated and secured entry.

Security is confirmed across numerous listings, with at least 10 distinct remark sections mentioning phrases such as "24-hour security," "24-7 security," and "round the clock security." Although some language appears reused or copy-pasted, the feature is supported by multiple listings and aligns with the 18/20 current MLS amenity records and historically high confidence.

The listings repeatedly confirm building security, including "24-hour security," "round the clock security," gated entry, and a secured building. However, no remarks describe security patrols, roving guards, patrol service, or a patrolled building.

Across all provided remarks, there are no references to security cameras or video surveillance, even though security is otherwise heavily marketed. With MLS also consistently omitting SECSYS, it is very likely the building does not have a distinct video security system as a marketed amenity.

Central air conditioning is strongly confirmed across the building. At least four listings explicitly mention central AC, including "quiet central AC when needed," while the current MLS data shows ACCEN/CENAC in 18 of 20 listings and ACCEN in inclusions for 19 of 20, indicating broad multi-listing support rather than an isolated copy-paste entry.

Across all the remarks, there are no references to split, mini-split, or ductless AC, while central AC is repeatedly highlighted instead. MLS data also shows 0/20 listings checking the split AC inclusion code, suggesting agents do not recognize split systems as a feature here. This consistent absence strongly indicates that split AC systems are not present in this building’s units.

Listings emphasize central AC and never mention window or wall-mounted AC units, even in detailed renovation and feature descriptions. MLS checkbox data likewise shows no window AC inclusions across 20 listings. This consistent lack of any reference supports the conclusion that window AC units are not a feature of this building.

All 20 of 20 current listings report CONCRE in the construction materials field, providing strong and consistent evidence that the building is concrete construction. Public remarks mention the building was built in 2005 but do not explicitly use the phrase "concrete construction"; the uniform MLS data and previously high confidence support retaining the feature.

8 of 20 recent MLS listings list double-wall construction (DOUWAL), but none of the public remarks mention double-wall construction and reporting is inconsistent across listings. Previously flagged with high confidence, the evidence is now mixed—some MLS records include it, but it's not corroborated in agent remarks.

Hollow tile construction is never mentioned, and no listing checks the hollow tile box in MLS. For a 2005 luxury high-rise, hollow tile as a primary construction type is improbable.

Masonry/stucco is supported by the MLS checklist data and aligns with the building’s commonly reported exterior system. Although remarks do not spell out the material, there is no evidence of a change or correction needed.

Steel frame appears in a minority of current MLS records (8 of 20), but none of the remarks explicitly confirm it. Because real estate remarks here repeatedly focus on views, amenities, and interior updates rather than structure, the evidence is only moderate.

A small number of listings flag slab construction, and nothing in the remarks contradicts a slab foundation. Considering standard practice for high-rise towers of this era, it is reasonably likely the building is constructed on a concrete slab foundation despite under-reporting in MLS checkboxes.

No analysis available

No listing indicates wood frame construction in the MLS data, and remarks consistently describe a modern high-rise concrete-style luxury building. Given the building type and age, wood frame construction can be confidently ruled out.

Only 3 of 20 recent MLS records indicate 'above ground' construction, while none of the public remarks refer to a raised/post-and-pier or above-ground structural style. Given the consistent depiction of a 2005 concrete luxury tower and the lack of any textual confirmation, the above-ground flag appears to be erroneous and is not supported by the listing remarks.

No MLS record indicates brick construction and there are no references to brick in the public remarks. The building is described instead as a tropical/Hawaiian-themed luxury tower, making brick construction very unlikely.

No listings mark or mention single wall construction, and the building’s age and type make this construction method effectively impossible here. This feature can be confidently excluded for this property.

A 30-day minimum rental period is explicitly stated in multiple remarks, which indicates that short-term rentals are not allowed. No listing mentions STR permission, vacation rentals, NUC, or TVU authorization.

The remarks contain no references to a hotel rental pool, hotel rental program, hotel management, Hilton, Trump, Ritz, or similar participation. Because short-term rentals are not allowed, hotel-pool participation must also be false.

No mandatory hotel-pool requirement was identified. The explicit 30-day minimum rental policy makes short-term rental hotel-pool participation inapplicable and false.

Across all supplied public remarks, there are no mentions of 'fee simple' ownership or equivalent phrases, and the land_tenure summary does not show any FS flags. Because of this lack of evidence, the existence of fee simple units in this building cannot be confirmed and is treated as not established.

None of the listing remarks refer to 'leasehold', land leases, lease rent, or lease expiry dates, and the land_tenure summary does not show any LH entries. In the absence of any explicit leasehold evidence, the presence of leasehold units in this building remains unconfirmed.

The remarks do not identify the building as leasehold and provide no four-digit lease-expiry year. No lease extension or renewal date was found.

The listings discuss investor use, rental terms, amenities, and building features but contain no statement about VA loan approval or VA financing. No evidence was found to establish that the building is VA approved.

The remarks were searched for explicit insurance language, including "fully insured," "full insurance," "fully covered insurance," "comprehensive building insurance," and "walls-in coverage." None was found, so there is no evidence that the HOA provides full building insurance coverage.

Fire sprinklers are supported by high-confidence historical MLS data and current FIRSPR entries in 10 of 20 listings. One listing explicitly confirms a "Fire Sprinkler System Installed throughout Building," providing direct building-level evidence despite limited mention in public remarks.

The remarks were searched for terms including fire/life safety evaluation passed, FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, and passed fire inspection. No qualifying statement was found; the fire sprinkler reference is insufficient to determine that the evaluation was passed.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are strongly confirmed for Lanikea at Waikiki. Multiple listings and unit remarks explicitly mention "sweeping ocean views," "Pacific Ocean," "ocean/coastline views," and "ocean view," indicating this is a real and commonly advertised building feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox error.

Mountain views are regularly noted with 7 of 20 current listings describing mountain or Ko'olau views. Phrases such as "mountain view," "green Ko'olau Mountains," and "views of ocean and mountain" appear across multiple listings, supporting inclusion.

Although the public remarks rarely spell out 'Diamond Head view,' multiple MLS entries explicitly mark Diamond Head as a view. The reference to units on the 'Diamond Head(East) side' further supports that some stacks enjoy Diamond Head views, making this a reasonable building-level feature.

City views are clearly established for this building. Several listings explicitly mention "city views," "city lights," and "Honolulu cityscape," and the current MLS pattern shows CITY in 18 of 20 listings, which is consistent with widespread availability across units.

High-floor corner units are described as having 'unobstructed ocean/coastline' views, indicating a clear view of the shoreline, not just open water. Together with multiple MLS agents selecting COASTLINE, this confirms that coastline views are available in the building.

Several descriptions emphasize greenery and landscaped vistas, including views over Ft. DeRussy’s park-like grounds and the building’s own lush gardens. Even though only one MLS record checks GARDEN, the narrative evidence shows that garden/park-style views are a real feature for certain units.

At least one unit clearly overlooks the Ala Wai Golf Course, and multiple MLS entries corroborate golf course views. This indicates that golf course views are available from some units in the building.

Direct 'marina' or 'harbor' views are not emphasized in the narrative remarks, but several MLS agents have selected the marina/canal view option. Given the location near the Ala Wai Canal and repeated MLS coding, it is likely that some units enjoy canal or related marina views.

Sunrise/morning views are noted in a smaller subset (3 of 20) but explicitly mentioned with terms like "morning sunlight" and references to the Diamond Head (east) side and enjoying morning coffee on the lanai. Evidence is consistent enough across listings to include the feature.

Sunset views are confirmed by multiple remarks and are not just implied by western exposure. Listings directly reference "stunning sunsets," "beautiful sunset from your balcony," and "enjoy sunset," showing that sunset-facing views are a marketed feature in this building.

All marketing materials focus on ocean, park, city, mountain, and golf course views, with no indication of a cemetery nearby or in the sightline. Given the consistent absence of cemetery references and MLS checks, it is highly unlikely that any units have cemetery views.

Multiple remarks directly connect the residence or its views with Friday night fireworks near the Hilton Hotel. This supports fireworks visibility from units in the building.

No analysis available

No analysis available

At least 4 of 20 listings clearly describe the building as pet friendly and one specifies it allows “2 Cats / Dogs or Other Household Pets,” with another noting a “dog area” on the grounds. The consistent, explicit pet-friendly language from different agents confirms that pets (cats and dogs) are allowed in this building.

Evidence strongly supports a resident/on-site manager at Lanikea at Waikiki. The current MLS data shows RESMAN in 13 of 20 listings, and multiple remarks describe the building as having 'an onsite manager' or similar management presence, indicating this is not just a copy-paste checkbox. This appears to be a consistent building amenity rather than a mistaken agent entry.

The building is consistently marketed as a residential luxury condo, not as a hotel or condo-hotel, and the only rental-related reference is to a 30-day minimum. With no mention of hotel operations, rental pools, or front-desk management in any of the 20 listings, it is very unlikely that this is a condotel property.

All 20 listings describe Lanikea at Waikiki as a condominium, and none use “co-op,” “cooperative,” or share-based ownership language. Combined with the absence of any COOTAX flags in MLS data, this supports that the building is not a cooperative.