Lalawai Hale
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Lalawai Hale
Building Overview
Lalawai Hale in Wahiawa-Whitmore Village: concrete construction (1974) with available parking; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Lalawai Hale
Lalawai Hale is a residential building located in the Wahiawa-Whitmore Village neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1974 and is of concrete construction. The MLS data provided does not include unit counts or floorplan details.
Key features from the MLS data include available parking. Building policies noted in the records indicate pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. No specific on-site amenities or common-area details were provided in the MLS excerpt.
Additional practical details from the MLS include that a management company is listed as unknown. Buyers should verify parking arrangements, any maintenance or association fees, and management contact information directly, as this summary is based on MLS data and may be incomplete.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Remarks reference investor interest and note tenant-occupied units but provide no numeric owner-occupancy percentage or quantifier that can be converted to a number. Without an explicit percentage or a current stored value to keep, owner-occupancy is unknown based on the remarks.
I searched all public remarks for explicit elevator mentions (e.g., '4 elevators', 'four elevators', 'multiple elevators' or simply 'elevator') and found none. There is no prior numeric value provided to preserve, so the number of elevators is unknown from the remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox OTCOEX is present in 9 of 11 current listings, indicating common area electricity may be included, but none of the public remarks mention 'common area electricity' or similar phrasing. Evidence relies on agent-entered MLS fields (possible copy/paste) without supporting remarks, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 11 current listings show SEWER in association_fee_includes, and at least one public remark explicitly says 'Low maintenance fees include sewer, water and trash,' confirming sewer is included. The agreement between MLS checkboxes and explicit remark across agents gives high confidence.
All 11 current listings show WATER in association_fee_includes, and a public remark explicitly notes 'Low maintenance fees include sewer, water and trash,' providing strong, corroborating evidence that water is included in the maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
10 of 11 current MLS listings have the COMLAU amenity checked, and at least two separate unit remarks explicitly state 'community laundry' or 'Community laundry available.' The evidence is consistent across multiple listings/agents (though some copy/paste risk), so the building is very likely to have shared laundry facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers assigned parking: 8/11 current MLS listings have the ASSIGN parking checkbox set, and at least 5 separate public remarks explicitly state 'one assigned parking stall' or '1 assigned parking space' (e.g., 'Complete with one assigned parking stall', 'Unit comes with one assigned parking stall'). Mentions appear across multiple agent remarks and listings, indicating the feature is broadly represented rather than a single copy/paste mistake.
No analysis available
I searched for wording such as 'deeded parking', 'owned parking', or 'parking included in deed' and found none. Multiple listings mention 'assigned parking stall/space', which indicates an assigned (reserved) stall rather than deeded ownership, so parking_deeded is set to false with limited confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit references to a monthly parking fee or parking rental charge. The remarks only reference an assigned parking stall and additional street parking but do not state any monthly parking fee, so the parking_fee is unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like 'parking waitlist' or 'join waitlist for parking' and found none. Remarks consistently state the unit 'comes with one assigned parking stall', so there is no evidence of a waitlist; parking_waitlist set to false with limited confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of 11 current MLS listings include the ACWIUN inclusion, and several public remarks (repeated across listings) state 'two newer air conditioning units installed in 2022.' While the remarks confirm on-unit ACs, they do not explicitly say 'window' units; combined with the MLS ACWIUN checkbox across multiple listings this indicates some units have window/wall ACs, though the language may reflect agent copy/paste rather than detailed descriptions.
One public remark explicitly states 'original CMU (Concrete Masonry Unit) walls', and the CURRENT MLS has 10/11 listings marked CONCRE. The mention is specific (CMU = concrete masonry unit) but only appears in one agent's remarks, so the evidence indicates concrete/block construction across the building but is not strongly corroborated in multiple remarks.
No analysis available
Although 6/11 MLS checkboxes list HOLTIL, none of the public remarks mention 'hollow tile' or 'hollow tile construction'. The lack of any explicit remark across listings suggests the HOLTIL flags may be copy/paste errors rather than an actual building feature.
CURRENT MLS shows MASSTU in 4/11 listings, but none of the public remarks reference 'masonry' or 'stucco'. The absence of explicit mentions across agent remarks suggests the MASSTU checkbox may be inaccurate or copied rather than reflecting an observable feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although 3/11 MLS entries list ABOGRO, none of the public remarks mention 'above ground construction' or similar language. The lack of corroborating remarks indicates the ABOGRO flags are likely agent checkbox inconsistencies rather than confirmed building characteristics.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit statements about short-term rental permissibility or restrictions. The remarks focus on assigned parking, resident manager, community amenities, and investor interest but do not state that STR is permitted. Therefore str_allowed is set to false with limited confidence.
I searched for any indication the building participates in a hotel-managed rental pool and found none. Because short-term rentals are not indicated as allowed, str_hotel_pool is false.
I looked for language like 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'must be in rental program' and found none. With no STR allowance indicated and no rental-pool mentions, str_mandatory_pool is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit lease expiry years (e.g., 'lease expires 2050', 'land lease to 2065') or renewal language. The listings contain no references to land lease/leasehold or any expiration year, so the lease expiry year is unknown.
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted'. There were no references to VA loan approval in any listing remark, so financing_va is set to false with limited confidence.
I searched the public remarks for language indicating the HOA carries full/walls-in insurance or comprehensive building insurance and found no such statements. In absence of explicit insurance wording or user verification, the feature is set false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I reviewed the remarks for explicit statements that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation (FLSE) or similar certification and found none. With no explicit mentions or user verification, absence of a statement leads to a medium-confidence default of false.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of 11 current listings (and one public remark) explicitly indicates mountain views—the remark reads "gorgeous mountain views, ample breeze and lots of sun light." Most other remarks do not mention views (they note breezes, light, location), so the evidence is limited to a single listing/agent and appears unit-specific rather than building-wide. Included because some units do offer mountain views, but confidence is moderate due to sparse corroboration.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
5 of 11 current MLS listings have the RESMAN amenity checked and one of the public remarks explicitly states 'peace of mind with an on-site Resident Manager.' However, only 1 of the 11 concatenated remarks actually mentions a resident manager, suggesting some agents may be copying the checkbox. Evidence is moderate—MLS checkbox prevalence supports inclusion but confirmation across remarks is limited.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.