Lalawai Hale
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Lalawai Hale
Building Overview
Lalawai Hale in Wahiawa-Whitmore Village: concrete construction (1974) with available parking; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Lalawai Hale
Lalawai Hale is a residential building located in the Wahiawa-Whitmore Village neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1974 and is of concrete construction. The MLS data provided does not include unit counts or floorplan details.
Key features from the MLS data include available parking. Building policies noted in the records indicate pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. No specific on-site amenities or common-area details were provided in the MLS excerpt.
Additional practical details from the MLS include that a management company is listed as unknown. Buyers should verify parking arrangements, any maintenance or association fees, and management contact information directly, as this summary is based on MLS data and may be incomplete.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for any owner-occupancy percentage or quantifier such as '80% owner occupied,' 'majority owner occupied,' or 'highly owner occupied,' but the remarks only mention that the property is suitable for investors and owner-occupants. References to tenant-occupied units do not provide a building-level owner-occupancy rate, so it remains unknown from remarks.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as 'elevator,' 'multiple elevators,' or a count like '4 elevators,' and found none. The listings focus on unit features, parking, and location, so there is no remark-based evidence to confirm the number of elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
OTCOEX appears in 10 of 12 current listings, suggesting common area electricity is likely included in the maintenance fee. None of the public remarks explicitly call out common electric, so the evidence looks like consistent MLS checkbox usage rather than agent-written confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no MLS support for HOTWAT across 12 current listings, and multiple listings instead note a water heater or that the water heater was replaced. That combination strongly suggests hot water is not included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is shown in all 12 current MLS listings, and at least one remark explicitly states, 'Low maintenance fees include sewer, water and trash.' The evidence is very strong and consistent, so sewer should be treated as included.
Water is included in all 12 current MLS listings, and the public remarks directly confirm it with the phrase 'Low maintenance fees include sewer, water and trash.' This is high-confidence, building-level evidence rather than a one-off agent note.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is not enough evidence to treat in-unit laundry as a building feature. Only 1 of 12 current MLS listings shows washer/dryer in inclusions, and none of the public remarks explicitly say 'in-unit laundry' or similar. This appears to be isolated MLS data rather than a consistent building amenity.
Community laundry is strongly supported across the building. Current MLS data shows 11 of 12 listings with COMLAU checked, and multiple remarks explicitly mention 'community laundry available' or 'convenience of community laundry.' The consistency across different listings and agents makes this a reliable building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that Lalawai Hale offers assigned parking. Multiple current remarks explicitly mention 'one assigned parking stall' or '1 assigned parking space,' and the historical MLS data was already high confidence with most listings checked for ASSIGN. This appears consistent across several agents rather than a one-off copy-paste issue.
No analysis available
I searched for wording indicating the stall is deeded or owned with the unit, but the remarks only describe assigned parking. Assigned parking alone does not establish deeded ownership, so this remains unsupported.
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to a separate monthly parking cost, parking rental, or additional parking charge and found none. The remarks mention an assigned stall, but no fee information.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'parking waitlist' language and did not find it. The listings consistently indicate the unit has an assigned stall, which suggests no waitlist issue is being advertised.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of 11 current MLS listings include the ACWIUN inclusion, and several public remarks (repeated across listings) state 'two newer air conditioning units installed in 2022.' While the remarks confirm on-unit ACs, they do not explicitly say 'window' units; combined with the MLS ACWIUN checkbox across multiple listings this indicates some units have window/wall ACs, though the language may reflect agent copy/paste rather than detailed descriptions.
Concrete construction is strongly supported across the building. Public remarks explicitly reference the "original CMU (Concrete Masonry Unit) walls," and the MLS data is highly consistent at 11/12 listings marked CONCRE. This looks like a building-level fact rather than copy-paste noise.
Double wall construction is not supported by the public remarks. Only 2/12 MLS entries show the checkbox, and none of the remarks describe double walls or a two-wall structure, so this appears unverified and likely not reliable.
There is no explicit remark evidence for hollow tile construction. Because the remarks describe CMU/concrete walls instead, the hollow-tile checkbox appears unsupported by the listing text and may reflect agent copy-paste rather than verified building construction.
CURRENT MLS shows MASSTU in 4/11 listings, but none of the public remarks reference 'masonry' or 'stucco'. The absence of explicit mentions across agent remarks suggests the MASSTU checkbox may be inaccurate or copied rather than reflecting an observable feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although 3/11 MLS entries list ABOGRO, none of the public remarks mention 'above ground construction' or similar language. The lack of corroborating remarks indicates the ABOGRO flags are likely agent checkbox inconsistencies rather than confirmed building characteristics.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit permission or prohibition of short-term rentals, including NUC/TVU references and minimum-stay rules, but found none. Since there is no public remark supporting STR permission, this is treated as not indicated.
I searched for hotel rental pool references such as hotel-managed, Hilton pool, or similar programs and found none. Because there is also no evidence that STR is allowed, hotel pool participation is set to false.
I looked for language requiring owners to join a rental pool or stating they cannot opt out, but found nothing. With no indication that STR is allowed, a mandatory pool arrangement is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit lease expiry dates such as 'lease expires 2050' or 'ground lease ends in 20xx' and found nothing. The remarks do not mention leasehold tenure or any renewal/expiration year.
I searched the public remarks for any VA-loan approval language and found none. The listings discuss the unit, location, and assigned parking, but do not reference VA financing eligibility.
I searched the remarks for terms like fully insured, walls-in coverage, comprehensive building insurance, or full HOA insurance, and found no such language. Nothing in the listings indicates the association provides full building coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for any statement that the building passed fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE, fire safety certification, or similar inspection language, and found nothing. The remarks do not mention fire/life-safety compliance, so there is no public-remarks evidence to mark this as passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of 11 current listings (and one public remark) explicitly indicates mountain views—the remark reads "gorgeous mountain views, ample breeze and lots of sun light." Most other remarks do not mention views (they note breezes, light, location), so the evidence is limited to a single listing/agent and appears unit-specific rather than building-wide. Included because some units do offer mountain views, but confidence is moderate due to sparse corroboration.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is limited and somewhat mixed: only 1 of 12 listings explicitly has SUNSET in the MLS view field, while most listings show NONE. The public remarks mostly mention mountain views, breezes, and sunlight rather than direct sunset views, so this looks like a weak but plausible building-level feature rather than a strongly confirmed one.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence points to a resident manager on-site at Lalawai Hale, but it is not uniformly confirmed across all listings. 6 of 12 current MLS listings have RESMAN checked, and at least one remark explicitly mentions 'an on-site Resident Manager,' which supports the amenity. The mixed MLS pattern suggests some agent copy/paste noise, so confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.