Lalawai Hale
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Lalawai Hale
Building Overview
Lalawai Hale in Wahiawa-Whitmore Village: concrete construction (1974) with available parking; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Lalawai Hale
Lalawai Hale is a residential building located in the Wahiawa-Whitmore Village neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1974 and is of concrete construction. The MLS data provided does not include unit counts or floorplan details.
Key features from the MLS data include available parking. Building policies noted in the records indicate pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. No specific on-site amenities or common-area details were provided in the MLS excerpt.
Additional practical details from the MLS include that a management company is listed as unknown. Buyers should verify parking arrangements, any maintenance or association fees, and management contact information directly, as this summary is based on MLS data and may be incomplete.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The remarks mention tenant-occupied units and that the property is suitable for owner-occupants, but provide no numeric owner-occupancy percentage. Because there's no explicit percentage and no prior value, owner_occupancy is unknown and cannot be inferred.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator mentions (e.g., 'elevator', '4 elevators', 'multiple elevators') and found none. No prior data exists, so the elevator count is unknown and cannot be inferred from the remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox OTCOEX is present in 9 of 11 current listings, indicating common area electricity may be included, but none of the public remarks mention 'common area electricity' or similar phrasing. Evidence relies on agent-entered MLS fields (possible copy/paste) without supporting remarks, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 11 current listings show SEWER in association_fee_includes, and at least one public remark explicitly says 'Low maintenance fees include sewer, water and trash,' confirming sewer is included. The agreement between MLS checkboxes and explicit remark across agents gives high confidence.
All 11 current listings show WATER in association_fee_includes, and a public remark explicitly notes 'Low maintenance fees include sewer, water and trash,' providing strong, corroborating evidence that water is included in the maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
10 of 11 current MLS listings have the COMLAU amenity checked, and at least two separate unit remarks explicitly state 'community laundry' or 'Community laundry available.' The evidence is consistent across multiple listings/agents (though some copy/paste risk), so the building is very likely to have shared laundry facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers assigned parking: 8/11 current MLS listings have the ASSIGN parking checkbox set, and at least 5 separate public remarks explicitly state 'one assigned parking stall' or '1 assigned parking space' (e.g., 'Complete with one assigned parking stall', 'Unit comes with one assigned parking stall'). Mentions appear across multiple agent remarks and listings, indicating the feature is broadly represented rather than a single copy/paste mistake.
No analysis available
I searched for wording such as 'deeded parking', 'owned parking', or 'parking included in deed'. Listings repeatedly mention 'one assigned parking stall' (e.g., 'Unit comes with one assigned parking stall'), which indicates an assigned space but does not confirm it is deeded, so parking_deeded is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for mentions of a monthly parking fee, parking rental cost, or similar language. The remarks only reference an assigned parking stall and additional street parking but do not state any fee, so parking_fee is unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like 'parking waitlist' or 'join waitlist for parking'. None of the listings mention a waitlist; they emphasize an assigned stall and additional street parking, so parking_waitlist is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of 11 current MLS listings include the ACWIUN inclusion, and several public remarks (repeated across listings) state 'two newer air conditioning units installed in 2022.' While the remarks confirm on-unit ACs, they do not explicitly say 'window' units; combined with the MLS ACWIUN checkbox across multiple listings this indicates some units have window/wall ACs, though the language may reflect agent copy/paste rather than detailed descriptions.
One public remark explicitly states 'original CMU (Concrete Masonry Unit) walls', and the CURRENT MLS has 10/11 listings marked CONCRE. The mention is specific (CMU = concrete masonry unit) but only appears in one agent's remarks, so the evidence indicates concrete/block construction across the building but is not strongly corroborated in multiple remarks.
No analysis available
Although 6/11 MLS checkboxes list HOLTIL, none of the public remarks mention 'hollow tile' or 'hollow tile construction'. The lack of any explicit remark across listings suggests the HOLTIL flags may be copy/paste errors rather than an actual building feature.
CURRENT MLS shows MASSTU in 4/11 listings, but none of the public remarks reference 'masonry' or 'stucco'. The absence of explicit mentions across agent remarks suggests the MASSTU checkbox may be inaccurate or copied rather than reflecting an observable feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although 3/11 MLS entries list ABOGRO, none of the public remarks mention 'above ground construction' or similar language. The lack of corroborating remarks indicates the ABOGRO flags are likely agent checkbox inconsistencies rather than confirmed building characteristics.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit statements such as 'short-term rental allowed', 'vacation rental', 'TVU', or conversely '30-day minimum' or 'owner-occupant only'. The remarks make no mention of STR policy, so str_allowed is set to false with medium confidence (absence of mention suggests STR is likely not promoted/allowed).
I searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or statements indicating building participation in a hotel-managed rental pool. There are no such mentions, and because str_allowed is not indicated as true, str_hotel_pool is set to false with higher confidence.
I looked for language like 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'must be in rental program'. None of the remarks mention a rental pool or mandatory participation; given STR is not indicated as allowed, str_mandatory_pool is set to false with higher confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit lease expiry years (e.g., 'lease expires 2050', 'land lease to 2065') or renewal language. The remarks contain no leasehold/lease expiry information, so the expiry year is unknown.
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans'. There were no references to VA loan approval, so financing_va is set to false with medium confidence.
I looked for explicit language indicating the HOA carries full/walls-in insurance and found no such statements in the remarks. With no prior data and no mention, this is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I reviewed the remarks for explicit statements that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or similar certification and found none. In the absence of any mention and with no prior data, the feature is set to false with medium confidence (absence in remarks suggests it likely wasn't stated).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of 11 current listings (and one public remark) explicitly indicates mountain views—the remark reads "gorgeous mountain views, ample breeze and lots of sun light." Most other remarks do not mention views (they note breezes, light, location), so the evidence is limited to a single listing/agent and appears unit-specific rather than building-wide. Included because some units do offer mountain views, but confidence is moderate due to sparse corroboration.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
5 of 11 current MLS listings have the RESMAN amenity checked and one of the public remarks explicitly states 'peace of mind with an on-site Resident Manager.' However, only 1 of the 11 concatenated remarks actually mentions a resident manager, suggesting some agents may be copying the checkbox. Evidence is moderate—MLS checkbox prevalence supports inclusion but confirmation across remarks is limited.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.