Lalawai Hale
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Lalawai Hale
Building Overview
Lalawai Hale in Wahiawa-Whitmore Village: concrete construction (1974) with available parking; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Lalawai Hale
Lalawai Hale is a residential building located in the Wahiawa-Whitmore Village neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1974 and is of concrete construction. The MLS data provided does not include unit counts or floorplan details.
Key features from the MLS data include available parking. Building policies noted in the records indicate pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. No specific on-site amenities or common-area details were provided in the MLS excerpt.
Additional practical details from the MLS include that a management company is listed as unknown. Buyers should verify parking arrangements, any maintenance or association fees, and management contact information directly, as this summary is based on MLS data and may be incomplete.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy indicators such as '80% owner occupied,' 'majority owner occupied,' or 'highly owner occupied.' The remarks only mention the property as suitable for owner-occupants or investors, which is not the same as building-level occupancy data.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator references such as 'elevator,' 'multiple elevators,' or a count like '4 elevators,' and found none. There is no remark-based evidence to confirm the number of elevators in the building.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
OTCOEX appears in 10 of 12 current listings, suggesting common area electricity is likely included in the maintenance fee. None of the public remarks explicitly call out common electric, so the evidence looks like consistent MLS checkbox usage rather than agent-written confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no MLS support for HOTWAT across 12 current listings, and multiple listings instead note a water heater or that the water heater was replaced. That combination strongly suggests hot water is not included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is shown in all 12 current MLS listings, and at least one remark explicitly states, 'Low maintenance fees include sewer, water and trash.' The evidence is very strong and consistent, so sewer should be treated as included.
Water is included in all 12 current MLS listings, and the public remarks directly confirm it with the phrase 'Low maintenance fees include sewer, water and trash.' This is high-confidence, building-level evidence rather than a one-off agent note.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is not enough evidence to treat in-unit laundry as a building feature. Only 1 of 12 current MLS listings shows washer/dryer in inclusions, and none of the public remarks explicitly say 'in-unit laundry' or similar. This appears to be isolated MLS data rather than a consistent building amenity.
Community laundry is strongly supported for this building. The MLS data shows 12 of 13 listings with COMLAU checked, and multiple independent remarks explicitly confirm it, including 'Community laundry available' and 'enjoy the convenience of community laundry.' This looks like consistent building-level amenity data rather than a one-off or copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly confirmed for Lalawai Hale. Across the remarks, multiple listings say "one assigned parking stall" or "1 assigned parking space," and current MLS data shows 13/13 listings with parking features rather than NONE.
Assigned parking is clearly supported by both MLS data and remarks. Several listings explicitly mention "one assigned parking stall" / "assigned parking space," suggesting this is a common building feature rather than a one-off agent note.
No analysis available
I searched for wording indicating deeded, owned, or included parking tied to the unit, but the remarks only describe an assigned stall. Assigned parking alone does not establish that the stall is deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for any separate parking charge, parking rental, or monthly fee language and found none. The listings mention assigned parking and even street/bicycle/moped parking, but no cost is stated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for "parking waitlist" or "parking waiting list" references and found none. The remarks consistently indicate each unit comes with an assigned parking stall, which does not suggest a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of 11 current MLS listings include the ACWIUN inclusion, and several public remarks (repeated across listings) state 'two newer air conditioning units installed in 2022.' While the remarks confirm on-unit ACs, they do not explicitly say 'window' units; combined with the MLS ACWIUN checkbox across multiple listings this indicates some units have window/wall ACs, though the language may reflect agent copy/paste rather than detailed descriptions.
Concrete construction is strongly supported for this building. Across 12 of 13 listings, MLS construction_materials is marked CONCRE, and public remarks explicitly reference the "original CMU (Concrete Masonry Unit) walls." The evidence is consistent across multiple listings/agents and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
Double wall construction is not supported by the public remarks. Only 2/12 MLS entries show the checkbox, and none of the remarks describe double walls or a two-wall structure, so this appears unverified and likely not reliable.
There is no explicit remark evidence for hollow tile construction. Because the remarks describe CMU/concrete walls instead, the hollow-tile checkbox appears unsupported by the listing text and may reflect agent copy-paste rather than verified building construction.
CURRENT MLS shows MASSTU in 4/11 listings, but none of the public remarks reference 'masonry' or 'stucco'. The absence of explicit mentions across agent remarks suggests the MASSTU checkbox may be inaccurate or copied rather than reflecting an observable feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although 3/11 MLS entries list ABOGRO, none of the public remarks mention 'above ground construction' or similar language. The lack of corroborating remarks indicates the ABOGRO flags are likely agent checkbox inconsistencies rather than confirmed building characteristics.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit short-term rental approval or prohibition language, including NUC, TVU, legal STR, or minimum-stay rules, and found nothing. With no evidence in the remarks, STR allowance is not confirmed.
I looked for hotel-managed rental pool language such as Hilton pool, hotel program, or similar references and found none. Since the remarks do not establish that STR is allowed, this must remain false.
I searched for terms like mandatory pool, required participation, or cannot opt out and found nothing. Without any indication that short-term rentals are allowed, mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit ground lease or leasehold expiry language such as "lease expires 2050" or "ground lease ends in 20xx" and found nothing. The remarks do not mention land tenure or any lease renewal/expiration year.
I searched the remarks for phrases like "VA approved," "VA financing accepted," and similar language, but found none. The listings focus on the unit updates, location, and assigned parking rather than loan eligibility.
I searched the remarks for terms like fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive HOA insurance. No such language was found, so the remarks do not confirm full building insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, including FLSE, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection. None of those phrases appeared in the public remarks, so there is no evidence to mark this true.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of 11 current listings (and one public remark) explicitly indicates mountain views—the remark reads "gorgeous mountain views, ample breeze and lots of sun light." Most other remarks do not mention views (they note breezes, light, location), so the evidence is limited to a single listing/agent and appears unit-specific rather than building-wide. Included because some units do offer mountain views, but confidence is moderate due to sparse corroboration.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence for sunset views is weak and inconsistent. Across the public remarks, there are mentions of mountain views, breezes, sunlight, and one reference to "sunset dinners" near the North Shore, but nothing that clearly states the building offers sunset-facing units. The MLS view data is mostly NONE, so this appears not to be a reliable building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence points to a resident manager on-site at Lalawai Hale, but it is not uniformly confirmed across all listings. 6 of 12 current MLS listings have RESMAN checked, and at least one remark explicitly mentions 'an on-site Resident Manager,' which supports the amenity. The mixed MLS pattern suggests some agent copy/paste noise, so confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.