La Casa

MLS property data is fully consistent, with 24/24 listings reporting the building was built in 1976. No remarks contradict or suggest a later reconstruction date.

The highest observed unit floor in MLS data is 23 (with other units on floors 7–22) and no remarks specify a higher or total floor count. This supports estimating the building at 23 floors, though it is only moderately certain since roof amenities are mentioned but not floor-numbered.

No listing remarks state a total unit count (e.g., 'X-unit building'), and no reliable MLS field is provided. As a result, the total number of units cannot be determined from the available data.

I searched for explicit owner-occupancy percentages and descriptions including '80% owner occupied,' 'majority owner occupied,' and 'highly owner occupied.' The remarks mention suitability for owner occupants and investors but provide no building-wide occupancy percentage. Per the numeric-field rule, the current value of 49.0 is retained with low confidence because there is no evidence in the remarks to confirm or deny it.

I searched for explicit elevator counts such as '4 elevators,' written-out numbers, or 'multiple elevators.' The remarks only describe elevator modernization and security access, with no count provided. Per the numeric-field rule, the current value of 2 is retained with low confidence because there is no evidence in the remarks to confirm or deny it.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Public remarks repeatedly mention room/unit AC (window or split-type) and never describe central air conditioning or building-chilled water systems. With 0 of 20 listings checking central AC in the fee-includes field, there is strong evidence that central AC is not provided or included in the maintenance fees. Buyers should assume individual AC, not a central building system.

No public remarks explicitly mention cable TV or cable service being included. However, 17 of 20 current listings identify CABTV in the association fee inclusions, consistent with the prior high-confidence conclusion and strong building-level evidence.

10 of 20 current listings mark OTCOEX as included, which supports inclusion of common-area electricity. No remarks mention 'common area electricity' or similar wording, so this is based primarily on moderately consistent MLS checkbox data rather than independent agent descriptions.

Multiple remarks highlight 'FEE SIMPLE' ownership, which is inconsistent with a co-op structure that would have co-op taxes built into monthly charges. With 0 of 20 listings checking the co-op tax inclusion field, there is overwhelming evidence that cooperative taxes are not applicable here. The building should be treated as a fee simple condo, not a co-op.

None of the reviewed listings indicate that in-unit electricity is part of the monthly maintenance fee, and 0/20 agents marked electricity as included in the MLS fields. Public remarks are silent on any 'all-utilities-included' arrangement, which is usually advertised if present. It is therefore very likely that unit electricity is billed separately to owners/tenants.

Across all listings, there is no indication that the building uses or includes gas service—no agents checked a gas-included field and no remarks mention gas ranges or gas utilities. The building appears to be all-electric, so gas is not an HOA-included utility. Buyers should assume no gas service and no gas charges in the maintenance fee.

No reviewed remarks mention hot water being included in the maintenance fee. Several listings explicitly reference a "new water heater" or "new water heaters," and the current MLS data strongly supports individual heaters (WTRHTR in 16/20 listings) versus HOTWAT in only 2/20, so the prior low-confidence feature should be corrected to false.

None of the supplied public remarks explicitly mention internet, Wi-Fi, or internet service in the maintenance fee. Nevertheless, 8 of 20 current listings mark INTSER as included, which supports retaining the feature with moderate confidence but may reflect inconsistent or copied MLS selections.

None of the listings describe marina access, boat slips, or related HOA-covered charges, and 0/20 MLS entries flag any marina inclusion. The building is positioned near beaches and parks rather than a marina facility. There is extremely strong evidence that marina fees or access are not included in the maintenance fee.

Public remarks do not independently discuss sewer charges or sewer inclusion. Current MLS data is highly consistent, with 19 of 20 listings marking SEWER as included, reinforcing the prior high-confidence determination.

None of the supplied remarks explicitly state that water is included in the maintenance fee. However, 19 of 20 current listings mark WATER as included, providing strong, consistent building-level evidence.

None of the listings advertise any BBQ, grill, or outdoor cooking facilities in the building. The complete absence of MLS BBQ checkmarks supports that La Casa does not provide a designated BBQ area.

Across 20 listings, there are no remarks referencing bike storage, bicycle rooms, or bike racks, and 0/20 have a bike-storage amenity checked in the MLS data. Given that agents consistently highlight other building amenities, the complete lack of any bicycle-storage mention provides strong evidence that the building does not offer dedicated bike storage.

Listings emphasize proximity to beaches, parks, and the Ala Wai canal but never discuss dock or mooring access. The MLS data confirms there is no marina amenity associated with the building.

At least 8 current listings explicitly mention the building’s “car wash area,” including multiple repeated remarks from different listings. This strongly corroborates the current MLS amenity data rather than indicating a checkbox-only or copy-paste error.

Agent remarks focus on rooftop amenities, parking, and pet-friendliness but never reference a clubhouse-type facility. The absence of MLS clubhouse selections strongly supports that there is no clubhouse in this building.

Remarks focus on a resident manager and building security, with no indication of concierge or front-desk services. Combined with all MLS records leaving concierge unchecked, this supports a high-confidence conclusion that no concierge service is offered.

Remarks emphasize that La Casa is pet-friendly but never mention any dedicated dog-park or pet-run facility. The lack of MLS dog-park selections supports that there is no on-site dog park.

Across 20 listings, agents consistently highlight a resident manager and secure entry but never a doorman or lobby attendant. The absence of any such mention plus unchecked MLS data strongly indicates there is no doorman at this building.

Across all provided remarks there are no references to a gym, fitness room, or exercise facilities. Combined with the fact that agents have not checked the MLS exercise-room amenity, this strongly suggests the building does not offer a dedicated exercise room.

Despite being in a luxury-adjacent area, none of the agents describe any limousine, town car, or courtesy car service. The MLS data fully aligns with this, indicating the building does not provide limo or car service.

None of the remarks describe any dedicated meeting or conference space. Together with the MLS data, this indicates that La Casa does not offer a formal meeting room amenity.

At least 25 of the provided listings mention a patio/deck-related feature, most commonly a private lanai or balcony, with repeated phrases such as "spacious 104 sq. ft. lanai," "large usable lanai," and "spacious covered lanai." Multiple listings also independently describe La Casa's shared rooftop deck or rooftop area with ocean and sunset views, so the evidence is strong across numerous remarks and is not limited to a single copied description.

The rooftop deck is large enough that an agent suggests you can 'jog around in a closed loop,' but it is not marketed as a formal jogging/walking path amenity. Given the lack of MLS indication of a jogging path, this appears to be casual use of the rooftop, not a dedicated path feature.

Listings do not advertise any children's playground or tot lot, which is typically highlighted in family-oriented buildings. The MLS data corroborates that there is no dedicated playground amenity.

None of the listings describe any private or fenced yard space—only lanais and a rooftop deck are mentioned. Given the high-rise urban setting and absence of PRIYAR in MLS, it is very likely the building does not offer private yard areas.

Agent comments focus on the rooftop deck, views, and proximity to the Ala Wai Golf Course but never mention an on-site putting green. With no MLS support, it is very likely the building lacks a putting green.

Remarks refer to a 'large rooftop deck' and 'serene rooftop amenities' where residents can relax, practice yoga, or jog in a closed loop, indicating a common recreation space. Even though the MLS RECARE box is not checked, repeated detailed descriptions from different agents confirm the presence of a usable recreation deck.

Agents consistently highlight only the rooftop and parking/manager features, with no references to a dedicated recreation or game room. The lack of MLS RECROO selections further indicates there is no separate recreation room.

Agents highlight proximity to many dining options and explicitly reference off-site restaurants and a café in neighboring buildings. Since no one describes an in-building restaurant or dining facility, the building should not be considered to have a restaurant amenity.

Multiple agents explicitly highlight a rooftop deck/area with sunset, ocean, and 360° views and note it as a place to relax, practice yoga, or jog. This repeated, detailed description across many listings provides very strong evidence that the building has common rooftop amenities accessible to residents.

One current listing specifically mentions a rooftop with “men & women's sauna,” which is an explicit confirmation of a building sauna. Although fewer remarks mention it than the other features, the detailed statement supports the current MLS data and prior high-confidence determination.

No listings' public remarks mention storage lockers, storage units, or dedicated storage areas (0/20). The MLS amenities checkbox shows STORAG/ADDLVSTORAG in 1/20 listings, but this appears isolated and likely a copy‑paste error; historical review was high confidence that the building does not offer storage lockers, so the feature is omitted.

The listings discuss parking, rooftop amenities, car wash facilities, and the building's proximity to beaches, but do not identify a dedicated surfboard-storage area. Searches for surfboard, board storage, surf storage, and related terms found no supporting evidence.

No agent comments describe tennis courts or tennis facilities. Given that no MLS listings report this amenity, it is highly likely the building has no tennis court.

At least 4 current listings explicitly mention the building’s “trash chute,” with repeated amenity descriptions such as “trash chute, car wash area, loading zone.” The remarks and strong 17/20 MLS prevalence provide consistent multi-listing confirmation.

Multiple remarks emphasize assigned and guest parking in a secured garage but never mention valet service. The combination of description and MLS data strongly indicates there is no valet parking at this building.

Agents specifically reference gated/secured parking and garage access, not a gated or fenced complex or perimeter wall. Given the unchecked MLS gated/wall-fence amenity and the parking-specific context of 'gated,' the evidence points to no building-level wall/fence enclosure.

Across all remarks there is no indication of any shared hot tub or spa facility in the building. Given the brand-name appliance reference and near-universal absence of the MLS whirlpool amenity, it is very likely the building has no whirlpool/hot tub feature.

None of the provided listings mention a pool or swimming pool. Repeated remarks instead highlight rooftop areas/decks, parking, saunas, and proximity to beaches and the Hilton lagoon, so the isolated 2/20 MLS pool-related flags appear likely to be copied or erroneous rather than evidence of a building amenity.

There is no mention of a heated pool or heated swimming facility in any of the 20 listings or remarks, and MLS data shows no pool or heated-pool features checked. Given the clear evidence that the building lacks a pool, a heated pool can be confidently ruled out.

The public remarks do not mention a pool, saltwater pool, salt pool, or saline pool. The building context independently confirms that the property has no pool.

In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listing set: well over 15 remarks explicitly mention phrases such as “in-unit washer and dryer,” “washer/dryer in unit,” and “stack washer/dryer,” with one listing noting a washer/dryer upgrade in 2023. The evidence appears across numerous listings and agents, not merely a single copied MLS checkbox, confirming that La Casa offers units with in-unit laundry.

Across all provided remarks, there is no reference to shared/community laundry, even when other amenities are described in detail, and 0/20 recent MLS entries flag a community laundry feature. Given the strong and repeated focus on in-unit washer/dryers instead, it is highly likely the building does not offer a separate community laundry facility. This appears to correct any prior assumptions that such a shared laundry might exist.

No shared paid laundry facility is identified in the remarks. Searches for coin laundry, laundry fees, quarters, card-operated laundry, and coin-op facilities found nothing.

The remarks consistently identify private in-unit laundry rather than shared laundry facilities on every floor. Searches for 'laundry on each floor,' 'laundry room on every floor,' and similar wording found no supporting mention.

All 20 current MLS listings indicate the presence of parking, and multiple remarks reference a parking stall or a parking garage for each unit. Buyers can expect the building to provide on-site parking options.

At least 15 of 20 listings support assigned parking, with repeated phrases such as "one assigned, secure garage parking stall," "three assigned covered parking stalls," "reserved stall," and "designated parking." The consistency across many listings and agents strongly confirms that the building offers assigned parking, although stall type may vary by unit.

At least 18 of 20 listings identify covered parking, with repeated remarks such as "covered parking stall," "secured, covered parking," "three assigned covered parking stalls," and "covered, assigned garage secured parking stall." The evidence is strong across many listings and agents, not limited to a single apparent copy-paste description.

Most remarks describe assigned, covered, or secure parking without specifying ownership. However, the explicit statement that two parking stalls were purchased separately is strong evidence that deeded or individually owned parking exists in the building.

Neither the MLS data nor any of the public remarks reference EV charging or stations. This strongly indicates that EV charging is not currently available in the building’s parking facilities.

The remarks provide a specific monthly parking charge of $40. This direct numeric statement supports very high confidence.

At least 15 of 20 listings support guest parking, with repeated phrases including "8 guest parking stalls," "guest parking available on the 6th floor," "ample gated guest parking spots," and "lots of Guest Parking." Multiple listings and agents confirm this building-level amenity.

At least 12 of 20 listings have the secured-entry parking designation, with many remarks stating "secure gated garage," "access to gated parking," "secured covered parking," "gated parking garage," and "keyed access required for building and elevator entry." The repeated, detailed confirmations across multiple listings strongly establish secured parking entry.

Neither MLS data nor remarks mention tandem or back-to-back stalls, even in listings that describe parking in detail. This makes it very unlikely that tandem parking is a notable or offered configuration in the building.

All descriptions focus on assigned and guest stalls in a secured garage, with no reference to valet service. The consistent omission across all listings strongly indicates the building does not offer valet parking.

The remarks repeatedly mention assigned, reserved, covered, gated, secure, and guest parking, but none reference a building parking waitlist. Based on the available public remarks, there is no evidence that a parking waitlist system exists.

Remarks explicitly say keyed access is required for elevator entry, indicating restricted elevator access. This is a clear, detailed, building-level description that outweighs the unchecked MLS amenity box.

Multiple listings confirm controlled access using key fobs, registered security devices, or keyed entry. This is strong evidence of a card/fob or electronic access security system.

Across 20 listings, agents describe a resident manager, secure building/garage, and keyed access but never mention a security guard or 24/7 security. With MLS guard amenity unchecked on all listings and consistent omission in remarks, this is strong evidence that the building has no security guard service.

The building is repeatedly described as secured through access controls and surveillance, but no patrol service is identified. Searches for security patrol, roving security, patrol service, and patrolled building found no mention.

At least one listing clearly notes 'secured building with cameras,' which is a building-level feature, not unit-specific. Even though agents do not check the MLS security system box, the explicit camera mention provides high-confidence evidence of video surveillance in the building.

Across all provided remarks, cooling is only described via individual air conditioning units in specific rooms, with no mention of central air or a building-wide HVAC system. MLS checkbox data (0/20 for central AC) supports the absence of central AC, so the building is very likely not served by central air conditioning.

No listings explicitly mention split AC, ductless AC, or mini-split systems. The single current MLS split-AC inclusion appears unsupported by the remarks, while other AC references are generic or describe room-level units without identifying the system type.

Window or room air conditioning is repeatedly documented across multiple listings, with at least 7 remarks explicitly mentioning AC and several specifying bedroom/living-room units or a “new window AC.” The 15/20 current MLS inclusion rate strongly corroborates the historical high-confidence determination.

Concrete construction is supported by the MLS construction-material field in 18 of 20 listings, indicating strong agreement across the building’s listing history. None of the provided remarks explicitly mention “concrete construction,” “concrete building,” or “reinforced concrete,” so the conclusion relies primarily on the consistent MLS data rather than independent remark confirmation.

Limited evidence: 6 of 20 MLS listings list 'DOUWAL' (double-wall). Public remarks do not mention double-wall or related construction details, so include as available/possible with low-to-moderate confidence — could reflect partial building areas or inconsistent agent checkbox usage.

None of the listings reference hollow tile walls or construction, either in checkboxes or narrative remarks. The building is instead repeatedly characterized through amenities (rooftop deck, garage, guest parking) typical of reinforced-concrete towers. This provides strong evidence that hollow tile is not a primary construction type here.

Moderate evidence: 6 of 20 recent MLS listings list 'MASSTU' (masonry/stucco). Public remarks across listings do not mention masonry or stucco (no phrases like 'masonry' or 'stucco'), so include as a possible building material with moderate confidence; may reflect partial or secondary materials or inconsistent agent reporting.

All 20 listings omit any reference to steel frame construction, and 17 instead explicitly mark concrete in the MLS checkboxes. The remarks describe a conventional Waikiki concrete condo tower with no mention of structural steel framing. This makes it very likely the building is not classified as steel frame construction in MLS terms.

1 of 20 current MLS listings explicitly lists 'SLAB' foundation; historical notes indicate a few agents previously selected slab. None of the public remarks discuss foundation type or a recent foundation change, so inclusion is based on limited MLS checkbox evidence and given moderate confidence.

No analysis available

None of the 20 listings mark wood frame construction, and no remarks use terms like 'wood frame' or describe a low-rise house-type structure. The consistent description of a secured, multi-story condo with rooftop deck and structured parking strongly indicates non-wood high-rise construction. This supports confidently excluding wood frame as the primary building construction.

4 of 20 MLS listings identify 'above ground' construction. Public remarks across listings do not describe a raised/pier structure or mention recent changes, so the evidence is limited to MLS checkbox entries across several agents and is treated as implied (moderate confidence).

Across all public remarks there are no references to 'brick exterior', 'brick construction', or similar wording. In the MLS materials data, brick is never selected for this building. Given local building norms and the lack of any brick-related descriptions, brick construction can be safely ruled out.

No listing identifies single wall construction, and none of the remarks use phrases like 'single wall' or 'old Hawaiian style'. Instead, they describe a secured, elevator-served condo with garage parking and rooftop amenities, which is inconsistent with single wall construction. This makes it virtually certain the building is not single wall.

Repeated 30-day minimum rental language explicitly rules out short-term rentals. No listing indicates vacation rentals, transient occupancy, NUC, TVU, or another STR authorization.

The prerequisite for hotel-pool participation is not met because short-term rentals are not permitted. Searches for hotel rental pool, hotel rental program, hotel management, and named hotel pools found no supporting remarks.

A mandatory hotel rental pool cannot apply when the building does not permit short-term rentals. No listing mentions a mandatory pool, required rental program, or inability to opt out.

Multiple listings describe fee-simple ownership, including one stating 'Don’t miss this opportunity to own FEE SIMPLE one bedroom.' Among the 20 listings reviewed, none are marked leasehold, indicating the building offers fee-simple units and appears predominantly fee simple.

Across all provided listings, there are no mentions of leasehold tenure or lease terms, and the land tenure field never indicates LH. Combined with explicit fee-simple marketing, this strongly suggests the building does not have leasehold units.

Searches for lease expiry, land lease, ground lease, leasehold, and renewal dates found no specific year. The repeated fee-simple descriptions provide no applicable lease-expiry date.

Repeated public remarks directly confirm VA approval and VA financing eligibility. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings, supporting very high confidence.

The building's full insurance status is repeatedly and directly confirmed across multiple listings. The explicit statement "100% Insured as of 2026" provides especially strong recent evidence, so the value is true with very high confidence.

Historic MLS data previously flagged the building as having FIRSPR (high prior confidence), but across ~30 public remarks provided no listing text mentions 'sprinkler', 'sprinkler system', or 'fire suppression'. Only 1 of 20 current listings shows the FIRSPR amenity checkbox. Given the lack of explicit remarks and the isolated checkbox, the feature’s presence is uncertain—kept as possible but with low confidence.

I searched the remarks for fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE, fire safety certification, life-safety compliance, and passed fire inspection language. Although the building is repeatedly described as 'fully insured' and 'VA-approved,' those statements do not establish FLSE passage. No qualifying fire/life safety evidence was found in the remarks.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are mentioned in numerous listings, both from individual lanais and the shared rooftop deck. Repeated phrases include “ocean views,” “peek-a-boo ocean,” “Ala Wai, Ocean, and Waikiki views,” and “360 degree ocean...views,” confirming this is a building-level offering rather than a single isolated claim.

Mountain views are strongly supported across the listing set, with approximately 13 current MLS listings containing MOUNTA and numerous remarks explicitly mentioning mountain, mauka, or Diamond Head views. The repeated descriptions across multiple agents indicate a genuine building-level feature rather than a single copied remark.

Diamond Head views are explicitly mentioned in at least one current listing, with the phrase “Gorgeous Diamond Head and city views.” Although less frequently reported than other views, the direct agent remark and historical high confidence support including the feature for the building.

City views are overwhelmingly confirmed, appearing in approximately 17 current MLS records and repeatedly in detailed remarks from multiple listings. Phrases such as 'city views,' 'Waikiki city views,' and 'the city light up' support this as a building-level offering.

Coastline-related views are supported by 3 current MLS records and numerous remarks describing ocean views from private lanais or the rooftop deck. While agents generally say 'ocean' rather than 'coastline,' the repeated coastal-view descriptions across multiple listings support including this building-level feature.

Across all provided listings, no agent ever references garden, courtyard, or landscaped views despite frequently describing other view types in detail. Combined with 0/20 GARDEN in MLS, this strongly indicates garden views are not a notable or distinct feature of this building.

Golf-course views are directly documented in a current listing that says, “Enjoy the sunrise, mountain, city and Ala Wai Golf Course and canal views.” The feature is less common than city or ocean views but is supported by explicit remarks and the historical MLS data.

Marina-related views are supported by multiple listings that specifically mention the Ala Wai canal. Several remarks pair “Ala Wai canal” with city, ocean, or sunrise views, indicating that canal/harbor views are available from some units.

Sunrise views are confirmed in approximately 5 current MLS listings, particularly for east-facing units with covered lanais. Multiple remarks explicitly use 'Enjoy the sunrise' and reference morning light or coffee, providing strong evidence that the building offers sunrise-view units.

Multiple current public remarks (at least 8 separate listing remarks in this batch) explicitly mention sunset views — key phrases include 'stunning sunset and Ocean views', 'rooftop deck perfect for panoramic sunsets', 'sweeping ocean and sunset views', and 'enjoy the sunset every day'. These sunset claims are repeated by different listing remarks and align with prior high-confidence historical data that rooftop and some lanais were marketed for sunset views, so evidence is strong and consistent across agents rather than a single copy/paste instance.

Multiple listings describe the immediate surroundings and views in detail, but no cemetery is ever referenced. Combined with 0/20 MLS cemetery flags and the urban Waikiki location, this strongly supports that the building does not have cemetery views.

The building's rooftop is explicitly described as a place to view Friday night fireworks, which satisfies the requirement for a fireworks view from the building. Other listings mention the fireworks in relation to the building's location but are consistent with the rooftop-view evidence.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Over ten listings call the building 'pet friendly', including one specifying 'PETS ALLOWED - no restrictions' and several repeating 'Pet Friendly (verify)'. This consistent language across different agents confirms that pets are allowed in the building.

Approximately 10 of 20 current listings explicitly mention the feature, including "on-site resident manager," "resident manager," and "building has a resident manager." The confirmations appear across multiple listing remarks and agents, strongly validating that La Casa has a resident manager on-site.

Listings market the property as a residential condo with at least a 30-day minimum rental and make no reference to hotel operations or a condotel program. Combined with MLS data, this strongly supports that the building is not a condotel.

The building is described as fee simple and there are no cooperative-ownership terms in any of the listings. MLS coding also lacks co-op indicators, so this building is almost certainly not a co-op.