Kupono 1
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kupono 1
Building Overview
Kupono 1 in Waipahu, built 1987; concrete construction. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Kupono 1
Kupono 1 is a condominium building located in Waipahu, built in 1987. According to available records, the building is of concrete construction. Unit count, unit sizes, and other building dimensions are not provided in the MLS data.
Key policy details recorded in the MLS: pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. The MLS listing does not include information on amenities such as a pool, fitness center, or common areas, and the management company is listed as unknown.
Parking arrangements, maintenance fees, and other homeowner association policies are not specified in the available MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers and their agents should verify all building details, policies, and fees with the managing entity or HOA prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The remarks do not state an owner-occupancy percentage or descriptive phrasing about owner-occupancy. Because no numeric value is provided or inferred, the owner_occupancy is unknown (null) with low confidence due to lack of evidence.
I found no references to elevators in the public remarks. In the absence of any mention and with no prior data, I report false with medium confidence (absence in remarks suggests the building likely does not have elevators).
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 6 current MLS listings include 'SEWER' in association_fee_includes, but the combined public remarks do not mention sewer or HOA fee details. The consistency across listings suggests agents checked the box, but absent explicit remarks or owner verification this is treated as likely but not fully confirmed across sources.
All 6 current MLS listings list 'WATER' in association_fee_includes, yet none of the public remarks reference water or HOA fee coverage. The uniform checkbox use points to water being included per MLS, but lack of corroborating remarks or owner verification means the conclusion is probable rather than certain.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least one listing remark explicitly states 'Residents also enjoy nearby walking paths.' Additionally, 3 of the 6 current MLS listings have the WAJOPA (walking/jogging path) amenity checked. While agent copy/paste is possible, the combination of explicit remark and multiple amenity checkboxes provides moderate-to-strong evidence that the building offers nearby walking/jogging paths.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 6 current MLS listings include 'WASHER/DRYER' in the inclusions, but none of the public remarks mention 'washer', 'dryer', 'in-unit laundry', or similar phrases. Because there is no prior historical confidence or agent/site-visit verification and remarks are silent (possible copy/paste), include the feature as available with moderate confidence (0.72).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 6 listings mention parking (e.g., “3 parking stalls - two covered and one open,” “covered parking offers convenience,” “covered parking space is just steps away”). MLS checkbox data also indicates parking across all listings, and remarks consistently describe multiple stall types.
MLS parking_features include ASSIGN on 3 of 6 listings, suggesting some stalls may be assigned. However, none of the six public remarks explicitly use terms like “assigned,” “reserved,” or “deeded,” so confidence is moderate and based primarily on MLS checkbox data rather than agent text.
Covered parking is repeatedly mentioned across listings (at least 5 of 6), with phrases like “two covered and one open,” “covered parking offers convenience,” and “covered parking stall right in front of the unit.” MLS checkbox data (COVER/GARAGE codes in 5/6) corroborates this strongly.
The listings repeatedly describe covered and dedicated parking stalls (e.g., '3 parking stalls - two covered and one open', 'your covered parking space', 'dedicated parking stall') but do not use language that indicates parking is deeded/owned. There is no explicit evidence that parking stalls are deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking charge', or 'additional parking cost' and found none. The remarks describe included and guest parking but do not state any paid parking fee amount.
Guest/visitor parking is called out in four listings (quotes include “ample guest parking throughout the community,” “additional guest spaces,” “numerous guest parking stalls,” and “visitor parking”), and MLS checkboxes include GUEST in 4 of 6 listings, providing strong corroboration.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or instructions to join a waitlist and found no references. There is no evidence from these listings that parking is managed by a waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox evidence is the strongest signal: 4/6 current listings mark CONCRE in construction materials. Only 1 of the public remarks explicitly mentions a "large concrete slab" (likely referring to a unit courtyard slab), and other remarks are silent—so the feature is included based on multiple MLS entries but the textual evidence across agents is limited and may reflect copy/paste rather than detailed confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR language (allowed or prohibited) and found none in the remarks. With no references to STR permissions, the listings provide no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed.
I looked for terms like 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or hotel management references and found none. Because STR allowance is not mentioned, there is no evidence of hotel pool participation.
I searched for wording that rental pool participation is mandatory (e.g., 'required to participate', 'must be in rental program') and found no such statements. There is no evidence that any rental pool participation is required.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit leasehold language and a 4-digit lease expiry year (e.g., 'lease expires 2050', 'ground lease ends 2065') but found nothing. Without any leasehold reference, the lease expiry year is unknown from these remarks.
I searched the remarks for terms indicating VA loan approval (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA financing', 'VA loans accepted') and found none. Therefore, there is no evidence the building is VA-approved from these listings.
There is no language in the remarks indicating the HOA provides full (walls-in) insurance or comprehensive building insurance. Given the lack of any mention, I report false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
The public remarks contain no statement that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation. With no explicit mention and no prior data, I report false with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/6) mention sunset views and none of the public remarks contain keywords like "sunset", "western", or "evening sun". MLS view checkbox currently shows 0/6 with SUNSET and 2/6 explicitly list NONE; with no owner/site verifications or remarks describing new changes, there is strong evidence the building does not offer a documented sunset view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
5 of 6 current MLS listings include the RESMAN amenity checkbox. None of the public remarks mention a resident/on-site manager (no phrases like 'resident manager' or 'on-site manager'), so evidence is primarily from MLS checkboxes across multiple listings and not corroborated in agent remarks; include as available but with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.