Kupono 1
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kupono 1
Building Overview
Kupono 1 in Waipahu, built 1987; concrete construction. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Kupono 1
Kupono 1 is a condominium building located in Waipahu, built in 1987. According to available records, the building is of concrete construction. Unit count, unit sizes, and other building dimensions are not provided in the MLS data.
Key policy details recorded in the MLS: pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. The MLS listing does not include information on amenities such as a pool, fitness center, or common areas, and the management company is listed as unknown.
Parking arrangements, maintenance fees, and other homeowner association policies are not specified in the available MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers and their agents should verify all building details, policies, and fees with the managing entity or HOA prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for numeric owner-occupancy statements and qualitative descriptions of owner occupancy, but none appeared in the remarks. With no explicit percentage or descriptive language, the owner-occupancy rate is unknown.
I reviewed all public remarks for any explicit elevator count or wording indicating multiple elevators, but none was found. Because elevator information is rarely included in these listings and there is no supporting text here, the number of elevators remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 9 current MLS listings include OTCOEX, suggesting common-area electricity is sometimes listed as part of the maintenance fees. Public remarks do not mention common electric or building power, so this appears to rely on MLS checkbox data rather than agent descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings list HOTWAT (0/7) and three listings explicitly include WTRHTR (water heater) in unit inclusions, implying hot water is supplied by in‑unit heaters rather than the building. None of the seven public remarks mention hot water being included in HOA/maintenance. Given the MLS unchecked flag and absence of remarks, high confidence that hot water is not included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 9 of 9 current MLS listings include sewer in the association fees. No public remarks mention sewer specifically, but there is no conflicting evidence, and the consistency across listings supports a high-confidence true value.
All 9 of 9 current MLS listings include water in the association fees. Public remarks do not explicitly mention water, but the MLS data is fully consistent across listings and there is no evidence of a change.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 8 recent listings mention patio/deck-type outdoor space, including phrases like "covered lanai," "private fenced courtyard," "private courtyard," and "large lanai." The repetition across multiple remarks strongly supports that buyers can find units with patio/deck-style outdoor areas in this building. The MLS checkbox data is only partial, but the written remarks provide solid confirmation.
The feature is strongly supported across the current listings: multiple remarks explicitly mention "nearby walking paths" and "Walking/jogging path." This aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS history, so it appears to be a real building/community amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Multiple agent remarks explicitly describe private outdoor spaces: 4 of 7 listings state phrases like "private fenced courtyard," "opens up to a private courtyard," and "large concrete slab and fenced courtyard." Three listings mention lanai/covered lanai without a yard; evidence is consistent across several listings (not a single outlier), so the building offers private yard/courtyard space for some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported for this building. One current remark explicitly says 'the convenience of an in-unit washer and dryer,' and the MLS inclusions show WASHER/DRYER in 8/8 listings. This looks consistent across the data and does not appear to be a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 7 public remarks mention parking stalls or spaces (quotes include "two parking stalls", "3 parking stalls - two covered and one open", "dedicated parking stall"). MLS checkbox data also consistently indicates parking across listings. Evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents.
Assigned parking appears to be present in the building, supported by the current MLS pattern (6 of 9 listings) and multiple remarks describing a dedicated or nearby stall. The language is somewhat agent-style and not always explicit, but repeated references to a specific stall location make this more than a copy-paste artifact.
Covered parking is strongly established for this building. It is supported by the current MLS data in 8 of 9 listings and reinforced by multiple independent remarks mentioning covered stalls, a covered space, and even two covered spaces in one listing.
I searched for explicit wording like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The remarks describe covered, dedicated, and assigned stalls, which suggests parking is included but does not prove it is deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for monthly parking charges, rental fees, or additional parking costs. The remarks only describe the number and location of stalls, so there is no evidence of a separate parking fee.
Guest parking is clearly available in the community. Multiple listings independently mention guest or visitor parking, including phrases like "ample guest parking throughout the community" and "numerous guest parking stalls," which aligns well with the current MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like parking waitlist, waiting list for parking, or join waitlist, but found none. The listings mention ample guest parking and multiple stalls, not a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence supports window air conditioning as an available feature in this building. 2 of the provided remarks explicitly mention it, including phrases like "Window ACs" and "window AC units," which aligns with the historical MLS inclusion data. The repetition across listings suggests this is not just a one-off agent copy/paste error.
MLS checkbox evidence is the strongest signal: 4/6 current listings mark CONCRE in construction materials. Only 1 of the public remarks explicitly mentions a "large concrete slab" (likely referring to a unit courtyard slab), and other remarks are silent—so the feature is included based on multiple MLS entries but the textual evidence across agents is limited and may reflect copy/paste rather than detailed confirmation.
A majority of MLS records indicate double-wall construction, but the remarks supplied here do not confirm it with any direct language. Without a clear on-site or agent description, this remains unverified and may reflect copied MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
1 listing explicitly mentions a "large concrete slab," making this a direct match for slab construction. The MLS history also shows moderate-to-strong support (5/9 listings), so this does not look like a copy-paste anomaly. Confidence is very high.
No analysis available
No public remarks in the provided listings mention "wood frame" or similar language, despite a small number of MLS records checking WOOFRA. This looks more like inconsistent MLS checkbox usage than verified building construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit signs that short-term rentals are allowed, including STR, NUC, TVU, and vacation-rental language. Nothing in the remarks indicates STR is permitted, so I cannot mark it allowed.
I looked for hotel pool references such as Hilton, Trump, Ritz, or managed hotel rental programs. There is no evidence in the remarks that this building participates in a hotel rental pool.
I searched for wording like mandatory pool participation, must rent, cannot opt out, or required rental program. The remarks contain no such language, so there is no evidence that any pool participation is mandatory.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold wording such as 'lease expires ####', 'ground lease ends', or renewal/extension language, but found none. There is no public remark evidence to extract a lease expiry year.
I searched the public remarks for terms like VA approved, VA financing, and VA loans accepted, but found nothing. With no explicit reference, I cannot confirm VA eligibility from the listings.
I checked the public remarks for HOA insurance language suggesting full or walls-in coverage, but there were no such references. Since insurance coverage is not stated in the listings, it remains unconfirmed.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or similar certification, but found nothing. Without an explicit statement in the remarks, this cannot be confirmed and is treated as not evidenced.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are explicitly mentioned in the current public remarks, with one listing stating "views of trees & the Kunia mountains" from the private patio lanai. The evidence is consistent with the building offering at least some units with mountain views, and there is no indication this is a copy-paste error or mischeck.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (4/7) explicitly mention private or fenced courtyards and lanais: phrases include "private fenced courtyard," "opens up to a private courtyard," and "private courtyard." Evidence is consistent across several agent remarks rather than appearing as a single copy-paste, so there is strong support that the building offers garden/courtyard views for some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks indicate sunset views, western exposure, evening sun, or similar terms. Across the 8 listings provided, the language focuses on courtyard, privacy, parking, and location; the MLS view data is also largely NONE, so there is no support for this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
7 of 8 current listings indicate RESMAN in the amenities, which is a fairly strong building-level signal. None of the public remarks explicitly say "resident manager," "on-site manager," or similar, so this appears to be MLS checkbox data rather than repeatedly described in listing text. Confidence is moderate because the checkbox is common across listings but not corroborated by remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.