Kunia Terrace
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kunia Terrace
Building Overview
Kunia Terrace in Waipahu, built 1966, concrete construction with on-site pool; parking available, no pets or short-term rentals.
About Kunia Terrace
Kunia Terrace is a residential building located in the Waipahu neighborhood, built in 1966 and constructed of concrete. MLS data provided does not specify building or unit size, unit count, or floorplan details.
Key features noted in the MLS include an on-site pool. The building construction is concrete, which may be of interest to buyers comparing building types.
According to available records, parking is available at the property. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. This information is based on MLS data; buyers should verify current details, policies, fees, and availability with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The MLS floor fields and unit-number-derived floors agree through all 9 listings at 3, matching the county max_floors and state registration.
The county reconciled unit count and state registration both report 41 residential units for Kunia Terrace; the limited distinct listings do not contradict this total.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 1846. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
The remarks describe unit renovations, parking, pool, laundry, location, and owner occupancy, but do not mention elevators or provide a number. No explicit evidence confirms or denies the presence of elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No listings mention cable TV being included, while only 1 of 9 MLS records checks CABTV. The evidence is insufficient and appears more consistent with an isolated MLS checkbox than a verified building feature.
Six of 9 listings identify common-area electricity through the OTCOEX inclusion code. No remarks explicitly confirm or contradict this, but the majority MLS pattern supports including it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Seven of 9 listings identify individual water heaters, and one explicitly says the water heater was replaced this year. No listing includes HOTWAT, so the prior high-confidence conclusion that hot water is not included remains strongly supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is marked as included in all 9 listings, with no conflicting remarks. The explicit phrase "including water and sewer" independently confirms the building-level feature across multiple data sources.
Water is included in all 9 current MLS records, and one listing explicitly says the maintenance fee is "including water and sewer." This is strong, consistent evidence from both MLS data and public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched all remarks for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', or combined bike/surf storage and found no references. Given the complete absence of any mention across multiple listings, it is moderately likely that the building does not offer dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 3 of 9 current listings explicitly mention the pool, using phrases including "association pool," "community amenities include a pool," and "community swimming pool." Combined with high historical confidence and pool-related MLS amenities present on 9/9 listings, the evidence strongly supports a shared building pool rather than isolated copy-paste errors.
No analysis available
The remarks reference an association pool and community swimming pool but provide no indication that it is a saltwater or saline system. I searched for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', and 'saline pool' and found no matches. In the absence of any explicit mention, the pool is assumed not to be saltwater.
No analysis available
At least 3 of 9 listings explicitly mention shared laundry, using phrases such as "24hour community laundry," "on-site laundry facilities," and "community laundry." This is supported by the strong 7/9 MLS amenity frequency and appears across multiple listing remarks, confirming a building-level shared laundry facility rather than a likely checkbox error.
Looked for terms such as 'coin-op', 'card-operated', 'quarters', or 'paid laundry' in all remarks and found no references. With no explicit evidence that payment is required, this field is set to false by default.
Multiple listings mention community or on-site laundry but do not say it is available on each floor. Searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor' or 'every floor' and found none, so this is assumed not to be a feature.
Parking is strongly confirmed across the building: at least 5 of 9 current remarks explicitly mention a parking stall or parking, including '1 assigned parking stall' and '1 assigned open parking (stall #10).' This agrees with the current MLS data showing parking features on all 9 listings and the prior high-confidence conclusion.
Assigned parking is directly documented in at least 3 of 9 current remarks, with phrases such as '1 assigned parking stall,' '1 assigned parking,' and '1 assigned open parking (stall #10).' The strong 8/9 MLS ASSIGN designation and repeated detailed remarks across listings provide high confidence that the building offers assigned parking.
No analysis available
Multiple listings confirm one assigned parking stall, but assignment alone does not establish deeded ownership. No phrases such as deeded parking, owned parking, or parking included in the deed were found.
No analysis available
The remarks describe one assigned parking stall and street parking but do not identify a separate parking charge. The available public remarks therefore provide no evidence of a parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is described as assigned or open, but no waitlist system is referenced. There is no public-remarks evidence that residents must wait for parking.
No analysis available
All remarks were checked for terms like key card access, fob access, card reader, electronic access, and keycard entry. None of the unit or community descriptions reference any electronic/card-based building access system, so this feature is likely not present based on available information.
No analysis available
The listings were reviewed for any indication of a security patrol service, including phrases such as security patrol, roving security, or patrol service. Since none of the remarks suggest on-site or roving security, the building likely does not have a security patrol based on current remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC appears in 3/9 current MLS listings through the ACWIUN inclusion field, so the building appears to offer this feature in some units. Public remarks do not explicitly say "window AC"; one listing references "newer ACS," making the evidence moderate rather than strong.
Seven of eight current listings identify the construction material as "CONCRE." No public remarks explicitly mention concrete construction, but the agreement across nearly all listings and prior high confidence indicate this is a reliable building-level feature rather than an isolated agent entry.
Only one of nine listings identifies "DOUWAL," and none of the provided remarks mention double-wall construction. The lack of corroboration across other listings or remarks makes this appear to be an isolated, potentially copied MLS entry rather than a validated building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks refer to first-time buyers, investors, tenants, and ordinary residential ownership, but do not state that short-term rentals are allowed. No explicit prohibition is provided either, so this remains a no-evidence determination.
The listings mention a community pool, laundry, and car wash area, but these are residential amenities rather than a hotel rental pool. Because there is no evidence that STR is allowed, the hotel-pool feature is false under the prerequisite rule.
The remarks contain no language requiring owners to participate in a rental program or hotel pool. Since STR is not established as allowed, mandatory hotel-pool participation must also be false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings do not identify the land tenure as leasehold or fee simple. No specific four-digit lease expiry or renewal year is provided.
The remarks discuss the unit's condition, renovations, location, maintenance fees, and ownership opportunity, but do not reference VA financing or approval. There is no public-remarks evidence that the building is VA approved.
The remarks do not mention full insurance, comprehensive building insurance, walls-in coverage, or any other HOA insurance details. Without an explicit insurance statement, this remains a low-confidence false assessment.
No analysis available
No remarks state that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, passed a fire inspection, is FLSE approved, or is life-safety compliant. Because there is no explicit confirmation or denial, this remains a low-confidence false assessment.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of nine listings identifies a GARDEN view, which indicates the building may offer at least one unit with this view. However, seven listings state NONE and none of the remarks mention a garden, courtyard, or landscaped view, so support is weak and may reflect a unit-specific or potentially copied MLS designation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In the current MLS data, 0 of 8 listings include SUNSET in the view descriptions, and 3 of 8 explicitly state the view as NONE. None of the public remarks mention sunset views, western exposure, or similar phrasing that would indicate notable sunset viewing opportunities. Given the lack of any explicit sunset-view references across multiple agents and listings, this building is not considered to offer a sunset view feature.
No analysis available
Listings emphasize proximity to freeway, shopping, schools, and on-site amenities, with no mention of viewing fireworks from units, lanais, or the building. This consistent omission suggests fireworks views are unlikely.
No analysis available
Five of nine current listings identify a resident manager through the RESMAN amenity checkbox, but no listing remarks mention a resident or on-site manager. Because the feature is supported only by potentially copied MLS checkbox data and lacks confirmation across agent remarks, evidence remains weak.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.