Kunia Terrace
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kunia Terrace
Building Overview
Kunia Terrace in Waipahu, built 1966, concrete construction with on-site pool; parking available, no pets or short-term rentals.
About Kunia Terrace
Kunia Terrace is a residential building located in the Waipahu neighborhood, built in 1966 and constructed of concrete. MLS data provided does not specify building or unit size, unit count, or floorplan details.
Key features noted in the MLS include an on-site pool. The building construction is concrete, which may be of interest to buyers comparing building types.
According to available records, parking is available at the property. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. This information is based on MLS data; buyers should verify current details, policies, fees, and availability with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
One listing clearly states that the building has '73% owner occupancy', providing a direct owner-occupancy percentage. This explicit figure is taken as the current best estimate for the building’s owner-occupancy level.
The remarks describe unit features, renovations, location, and amenities such as pool and laundry but never reference elevators. Without an explicit mention, the number of elevators in the building remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Most current listings (5/8) mark common area electricity as included in the maintenance fee via the OTCOEX flag, and none of the remarks suggest a separate common power charge. While remarks do not explicitly mention common area electricity, the majority MLS data implies it is covered by the HOA for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings reference individual water heaters, including one remark that "the water heater was replaced this year," and 6 of 8 MLS entries include WTRHTR. With no HOTWAT checkbox marked and no remarks suggesting building-supplied hot water, hot water is not included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
One detailed listing notes that the maintenance fee "including water and sewer" is $355, and all 8 MLS records mark SEWER as included. This consistent data across agents and listings strongly supports that sewer is covered by the HOA fee.
A key listing explicitly states the maintenance fee "including water and sewer," and all 8 MLS entries check WATER in the association_fee_includes field. The consistent checkbox data plus direct remark evidence show that water is included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched all remarks for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', or combined bike/surf storage and found no references. Given the complete absence of any mention across multiple listings, it is moderately likely that the building does not offer dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings for this building explicitly reference a shared pool, including phrases like 'association pool,' 'community swimming pool,' and 'community amenities include a pool.' All 8 current MLS entries also have the pool amenity checked, suggesting consistent agent awareness rather than a one-off error. Evidence is strong that the building offers a common swimming pool for residents.
No analysis available
The remarks reference an association pool and community swimming pool but provide no indication that it is a saltwater or saline system. I searched for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', and 'saline pool' and found no matches. In the absence of any explicit mention, the pool is assumed not to be saltwater.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Looked for terms such as 'coin-op', 'card-operated', 'quarters', or 'paid laundry' in all remarks and found no references. With no explicit evidence that payment is required, this field is set to false by default.
Multiple listings mention community or on-site laundry but do not say it is available on each floor. Searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor' or 'every floor' and found none, so this is assumed not to be a feature.
Multiple listings confirm parking, with 4 out of 8 remarks explicitly referencing a dedicated stall such as '1 assigned parking' and '1 assigned open parking (stall #10)'. MLS checkbox data is fully consistent, with 8/8 listings showing a valid parking type and none showing 'NONE'. Evidence across agents and units is strong that the building offers parking stalls.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases such as 'deeded parking', 'owned parking', or 'parking included in deed' in all remarks. Only assigned/open parking is mentioned, so it likely is not deeded, but this is not explicitly confirmed.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit references to a separate monthly parking fee or rental cost and found none. It is unclear whether parking is included in maintenance or free, so the exact monthly parking fee cannot be determined from the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for mentions of a parking waitlist or any system requiring residents to wait for an available stall and found no such indications. Given the absence of any mention across multiple listings, a formal parking waitlist system likely does not exist, but this is not explicitly stated.
No analysis available
All remarks were checked for terms like key card access, fob access, card reader, electronic access, and keycard entry. None of the unit or community descriptions reference any electronic/card-based building access system, so this feature is likely not present based on available information.
No analysis available
The listings were reviewed for any indication of a security patrol service, including phrases such as security patrol, roving security, or patrol service. Since none of the remarks suggest on-site or roving security, the building likely does not have a security patrol based on current remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS construction_materials for Kunia Terrace list concrete (CONCRE) in 7 of 8 current listings, indicating a consistent building-level attribute rather than an individual-unit feature. Although the public remarks do not explicitly say “concrete construction,” there are no remarks contradicting it, so the repeated MLS checkbox data across multiple listings is treated as reliable evidence of concrete construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched remarks for terms like short-term rental, vacation rental, hotel program, NUC/TVU, or minimum day requirements and found none. The language used suggests standard long-term residential and investment use rather than transient lodging, so short-term rentals are assumed not allowed in the absence of explicit evidence.
Searched for references to a hotel rental pool, hotel management, or branded hotel programs and found none. Combined with the lack of STR indications, this strongly suggests there is no hotel rental pool program in this building.
Searched for phrases like mandatory rental program, required hotel pool, or must participate and found no mentions. Since there is no indication of any hotel pool at all, participation cannot be mandatory.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks do not state whether units are leasehold or fee simple, nor do they mention any lease expiry or extension dates. Without a specific year or lease context, the lease expiry year cannot be established.
Remarks discuss renovations, location, amenities, and maintenance fees but never reference VA financing or VA approval. Based on this absence across multiple listings, the building is likely not VA-approved, though it is not explicitly denied.
The remarks focus on unit condition, renovations, amenities, and location, with no discussion of HOA or building insurance coverage. Without explicit statements, full (walls-in) insurance coverage cannot be confirmed and is assumed not indicated in the listing remarks.
No analysis available
Searched for phrases like 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'fire inspection', 'life safety compliant', and similar, but none were present. In the absence of any reference, it is treated as not confirmed/likely not documented as passed in the remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In the current MLS data, 0 of 8 listings include SUNSET in the view descriptions, and 3 of 8 explicitly state the view as NONE. None of the public remarks mention sunset views, western exposure, or similar phrasing that would indicate notable sunset viewing opportunities. Given the lack of any explicit sunset-view references across multiple agents and listings, this building is not considered to offer a sunset view feature.
No analysis available
Listings emphasize proximity to freeway, shopping, schools, and on-site amenities, with no mention of viewing fireworks from units, lanais, or the building. This consistent omission suggests fireworks views are unlikely.
No analysis available
Across 8 listings, 4 list a resident manager in the amenities, but no remarks describe a resident or on-site manager. Because agents often reuse MLS checkbox data and the narratives highlight other amenities (pool, laundry) without ever mentioning building management, evidence for a resident manager is weak and inconsistent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.