Kunia Palms
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kunia Palms
Building Overview
Kunia Palms in Waipahu (built 1969) — concrete construction with pool and sunset views.
About Kunia Palms
Kunia Palms is a residential building located in the Waipahu neighborhood. According to available records, the property was built in 1969 and is of concrete construction, with sunset views noted in the MLS data.
Key features listed in the MLS include an on-site pool and a resident manager. The building's construction type and the presence of these amenities are drawn from available MLS information.
Parking is available and assigned. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed, and the management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, fees, and policies with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for numeric owner-occupancy figures or qualitative indicators (e.g., 'majority owner-occupied', 'high owner occupancy') across all remarks and found none. Without explicit statements, the owner-occupancy percentage is unknown from the public remarks.
I searched all public remarks for references to elevators or lifts, including numeric counts and phrases like 'four elevators' or 'multiple elevators'. No evidence was found in any remark, so the number of elevators is unknown based on available public remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across recent listings for this building, 18 out of 20 indicate OTCOEX in the association_fee_includes field, implying common area electricity is covered by the maintenance fees. While the public remarks focus on water/sewer sub-metering and insurance rather than electricity, the consistent MLS checkbox usage across many listings strongly suggests that common area electricity is included in the monthly fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 20 current listings includes HOTWAT, whereas 12 of 20 list WTRHTR. Remarks repeatedly state water is sub-metered and that a unit “Water heater was replaced in 2023,” with no mention of building-supplied hot water included in maintenance. The pattern across multiple agents and checklist data indicates hot water is not included in the association fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (10+ of 20) describe shared amenities like a 'community pool & kiddie splash pool,' 'pool and hot tub/jacuzzi,' and 'great community amenities such as a swimming pool,' indicating a common recreational space. The MLS RECARE checkbox is selected in some listings, and the repeated references to these facilities across different agents support that the building offers a de facto recreation area even if not labeled explicitly as such.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
High-confidence evidence that the building has a shared swimming pool: CURRENT MLS indicates 20/20 listings include pool-related amenities and many public remarks explicitly state "community pool & kiddie splash pool", "sparkling pool", "swimming pool", and "pool and jacuzzi". The pool is mentioned across multiple agent remarks rather than appearing isolated, indicating a consistent building-level amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has shared laundry: MLS checkbox historically set in 19/20 listings and numerous agent remarks explicitly state "community laundry," "community laundry facilities," "laundry room," or "just steps to community laundry." Mentions appear across many different listings/agents rather than a single copy-paste, supporting high confidence that a common/shared laundry exists at Kunia Palms.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across listings that the building offers parking: 20 of 20 current MLS listings include parking-related parking_features (OPEN/CO/GARAGE/etc.), and public remarks repeatedly mention 'full-size parking stall', 'parking stall 218 included', and 'a few steps from the parking stall.' Evidence appears across many agents and listings, not a single copy/paste instance.
Multiple listings (MLS shows 18 of 20) and many public remarks explicitly note assigned/reserved parking: examples include 'one assigned parking stall,' 'assigned parking space,' 'designated parking spot,' and 'Parking stall 218 included.' The consistency across agents and listings indicates assigned stalls are a building feature.
No analysis available
Listings repeatedly describe parking as an assigned/designated stall and never state 'deeded' or 'owned' stall. That language implies parking is not deeded; therefore false with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like 'monthly parking fee', 'parking charge', or similar in the public remarks. No explicit parking fee amount or monthly charge is stated, so the parking fee is unknown from these remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for 'waitlist', 'waiting list', or language indicating a parking queue. The remarks consistently describe an assigned stall for units and do not mention a waitlist, so a waitlist is unlikely but not fully ruled out.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence for concrete construction: 19 of 20 current MLS listings mark CONCRE (previously 18/20). No public remarks mention a different primary structure (e.g., hollow tile), and multiple agents consistently checked concrete, suggesting the building is constructed of concrete rather than being a copy-paste error.
Just 2 of 20 listings indicate double wall (DOUWAL) in construction_materials, and none of the public remarks for any listing mention double-wall or similar terminology. The dominant and consistent identification of concrete construction, combined with the lack of textual support, makes it very unlikely that Kunia Palms is characterized by double-wall construction. The sparse DOUWAL entries are best explained as inconsistent MLS checkbox usage.
Mixed evidence for hollow tile: 6 of 20 current MLS listings show HOLTIL, up slightly from historical counts (about 5/20). No public remarks reference hollow tile explicitly, and the majority of agents marked concrete, so hollow tile may apply to some units/sections or reflect inconsistent agent checkbox usage rather than a building-wide feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR language (short-term rental allowed, vacation rental, TVU, NUC, or 30-day minimum) and found none. Absence of any STR wording suggests short-term rentals are not allowed, but the remarks do not explicitly state a prohibition, so confidence is moderate.
I searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', and references to hotel management and found none. Because STR is not indicated and no hotel pool language appears, hotel-rental-pool participation is false with high confidence.
I looked for language like 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'cannot opt out' and found none. Given STR is not indicated and no mandatory program language appears, mandatory participation is false with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'ground lease ends', and for any 4-digit expiry year. Nothing was found, so the lease expiry year is unknown from these remarks.
Public remarks explicitly state the building is VA approved. Multiple listings reference VA approval, so VA financing acceptance is well supported.
Several listings repeatedly state the HOA/building carries 100% hurricane insurance, which indicates comprehensive/walls-in coverage. Because this is explicitly and consistently mentioned across remarks, the building is marked as fully insured with high confidence.
No analysis available
I scanned the remarks for explicit statements indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation (e.g., 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified'). None were found; absent an explicit mention and with no existing confirmed value, I report false with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Some units in the building appear to offer sunset views: 2 of 20 current MLS view_descriptions explicitly list 'SUNSET' while 12 of 20 list 'NONE'. None of the provided public remarks mention evening or western views, so the evidence is limited to a small number of MLS checkboxes and may reflect agent entry variance or a few units with western exposure rather than a building-wide feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly state that Kunia Palms has a resident/on-site manager, using phrases like 'resident manager,' 'on-site resident manager,' and 'on site manager.' This is reinforced by MLS data where 16 of 20 listings check the resident manager amenity, suggesting a well-established building feature rather than a one-off error. Evidence is consistent across several agents and timeframes, supporting inclusion of this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.