Kumelewai Gardens 2
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kumelewai Gardens 2
Building Overview
Kumelewai Gardens 2 in Mililani Mauka-Launani Valley, built 1993; no pets and no short-term rentals allowed (based on MLS data).
About Kumelewai Gardens 2
Kumelewai Gardens 2 is located in the Mililani Mauka–Launani Valley neighborhood and was built in 1993. Specific details on building size (units, square footage) and construction type are not provided in the available MLS data.
According to available records, the property does not allow pets and does not permit short-term rentals. No listed amenities (such as pools, fitness centers, or common areas) are provided in the MLS summary for this building, and the management company is listed as unknown.
Additional information commonly relevant to buyers — including parking arrangements, monthly maintenance or association fees, utility responsibilities, and any specific resident rules — are not included in the MLS data supplied. Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, policies, and fees with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
There is no owner-occupancy percentage or descriptive owner-occupancy language in the public remarks. I searched all listings for explicit owner-occupancy statements but found none, and no current numeric value was available to retain.
No public remarks reference elevators. I searched all listing remarks for explicit elevator counts or mentions (e.g., 'elevator', '4 elevators', 'multiple elevators') and found nothing, and there is no existing numeric value available to retain. Without explicit evidence, I cannot infer a number.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 8 listings' MLS association_fee_includes fields list OTCOEX (common area electricity). None of the public remarks mention 'common area electricity' or similar language, suggesting agents may have checked the MLS box without elaboration. MLS checkbox consistency supports inclusion but absence in remarks limits confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 8 listings list SEWER in association_fee_includes on MLS. None of the public remarks state 'sewer included' or similar. The uniform MLS checkboxes indicate the fee is likely included, but lack of explicit mention in agent remarks reduces confidence.
All 8 listings' MLS association_fee_includes fields list WATER. No public remarks explicitly say 'water included' or 'water in HOA fees.' The consistent MLS entries support inclusion, but absence of explicit mentions in remarks suggests moderate (not high) confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS data flags storage in 4 of 8 listings (amenities and unit_features). Among the public remarks, 1 listing explicitly states "additional storage" while the other listings focus on pools, parks, and in-unit features; no remarks describe dedicated storage lockers or a building storage room. Evidence is mixed—MLS checkboxes suggest storage is offered in some units, but only one agent remark directly references it, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Four separate listing remarks explicitly reference pools: one states "amenities include a pool, BBQ areas," others reference "amenities like swimming pools," "numerous recreation centers, pools," and "amenities ... parks and pools." This aligns with the MLS checkbox (4/8 listings) and appears consistent across multiple agents, indicating the building/community offers pool access.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox indicates 7 of 8 listings include washer/dryer. Public remarks across three separate listings explicitly state 'stack washer/dryer', 'full size washer/dryer', and 'new washer, dryer', supporting that some units have in-unit laundry. Evidence comes from multiple listings/agents and aligns with the MLS inclusions, so the building should be listed as offering in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 8 current listings have parking checkbox codes and several public remarks explicitly cite parking: '2 assigned parking stalls', 'deeded parking directly in front', and 'Parking stall 132'. Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, indicating the building offers resident parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks explicitly indicate assigned/deeded parking stalls and a specific stall number across listings, providing high-confidence evidence that parking is deeded with the unit.
No analysis available
I searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking charge', and similar terms. There is no information about a parking fee, so the monthly parking fee is unknown.
Seven of eight current listings have the GUEST parking checkbox in MLS parking_features, but none of the provided public remarks specifically mention 'guest parking' or 'visitor parking'. The widespread MLS coding across multiple listings suggests guest parking exists, though the absence of explicit remarks warrants slightly lower confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'parking waitlist' and related phrases. There are no references to a waitlist; absent explicit mentions, I set parking_waitlist to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox ACWIUN appears on 3 of 8 current listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly state 'window AC', 'window unit', or 'wall AC'. Two remarks say only 'AC' or 'AC unit included' and others mention 'cool breezes' or ceiling fans, suggesting agents may have used the checkbox inconsistently. Given absent historical support and lack of explicit mentions across remarks, there's insufficient evidence that the building offers window air conditioners.
No analysis available
All 8 of 8 current MLS listings list double wall construction (DOUWAL). Although the public remarks do not explicitly state 'double wall' or similar, the consistent, building-wide MLS coding across all listings is strong evidence that the building has double wall construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
5 of 8 current MLS listings list slab foundation (SLAB). There are no remarks referencing 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation', so the conclusion relies on majority MLS checkbox usage and is moderately supported rather than explicitly documented in agent remarks.
No analysis available
3 of 8 current MLS listings list wood frame (WOOFRA) in construction materials. None of the public remarks mention construction type (no phrases like 'wood frame'), so the evidence relies on MLS checkbox entries across listings and appears moderately supported rather than explicitly described in agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for language about STR permission or minimum stay limits (e.g., 30-day minimum). The remarks do not mention STR policies, so str_allowed is set to false with medium confidence (absence of evidence).
I searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', and hotel-managed language. None found; because STRs are not indicated as allowed, str_hotel_pool is false.
I searched for phrases like 'mandatory hotel pool' or 'required to participate' and found none. With no evidence and STRs not indicated as allowed, str_mandatory_pool is set to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit lease expiry years (e.g., 'lease expires 2050', 'land lease to 2065') and any leasehold language. Nothing was found, so the lease expiry year is unknown.
I searched for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted'. The remarks only reference a VA loan assumption on a unit, which does not confirm building-level VA approval, so financing_va is set to false with medium confidence.
The remarks make no statement that the HOA or building has 'walls-in' or full building insurance. I reviewed the text for insurance-related phrasing and found no references, so there is no evidence the building is fully insured by the HOA.
No analysis available
The public remarks do not state that the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation. I looked for explicit FLSE/fire inspection language across all remarks and found no mentions, so there is no evidence to mark this as passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of eight current MLS listings indicate 'MOUNTA' (mountain) in the view field, while three list NONE. None of the public remarks mention mountain or mauka views; the evidence is limited to MLS checkbox entries and appears possibly copy/pasted, so inclusion is warranted but with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of eight current MLS listings indicates 'SUNSET' in the view field, but none of the public remarks reference sunset or western exposure. This is weak, checkbox-only evidence (possible agent copy/paste), so the building is marked as offering sunset views with low-to-moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.