Kulanui Hale
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kulanui Hale
Building Overview
Kulanui Hale in Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis; concrete building (1995) with mountain views and pets allowed.
About Kulanui Hale
Based on MLS data, Kulanui Hale is a residential building located in the Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1995 and is of concrete construction. Specific unit sizes and number of units are not provided in the available MLS information.
According to available records, Kulanui Hale offers mountain views and uses window air conditioning in units. The building has one elevator and permits pets. Short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS data provided.
MLS data indicates parking is available with covered, assigned stalls and guest parking. The management company is listed as unknown in the provided records. Buyers should verify all details, including fees, unit sizes, parking assignments, pet rules, and management, with their agent or the managing entity.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Marketing language references both owner-occupants and investors but gives no numeric owner-occupancy rate (e.g., '80% owner occupied'). Without explicit percentages or clear descriptors like 'majority owner-occupied', the actual owner-occupancy share remains unknown.
Remarks consistently mention one elevator, including that it is new and secured. No text suggests the presence of multiple elevators, so the existing count of 1 is confirmed.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
6 of 8 recent listings mark OTCOEX/other common expenses in the association fee includes, suggesting common area electricity is covered by the HOA. No remarks mention owners paying separately for common-area power, and there is no conflicting evidence, so this appears to be a standard building-level inclusion likely copied correctly by multiple agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 listings explicitly include a water heater (WTRHTR), implying each unit generates its own hot water rather than receiving building-supplied hot water. Despite 7 of 8 MLS entries checking HOTWAT, no remarks say 'hot water included in maintenance fee,' and the presence of in-unit heaters plus sub-metered electric strongly supports that hot water is not a common utility paid by the HOA.
No analysis available
No analysis available
8 out of 8 listings list SEWER in the association fee includes, with no text indicating separate sewer billing. The consistency across all listings from different agents indicates sewer charges are covered by the maintenance fees for this building.
WATER appears in the association fee includes field on all 8 listings, and remarks only single out electricity as separately sub-metered. With no conflicting comments and universal agent agreement, water is very likely included in the HOA maintenance fees for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings describe unit-specific outdoor spaces, including a ground floor unit with a "rear lanai off of bedroom" and another with a "useable courtyard," confirming that at least some units have patio/deck-type areas. MLS checkbox data (6 of 8 listings with PATDEC/COVPAT) aligns with these remarks, suggesting agents consistently recognize outdoor living spaces at this property. Buyers seeking units with lanais or courtyards would reasonably consider this building for that feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Six of eight current MLS listings for this building include the TRACHU (trash chute) amenity, indicating that agents consistently represent a trash chute as a building feature. While the public remarks do not explicitly mention a trash or garbage chute, the repeated MLS amenity selection across multiple listings provides moderate but building-wide evidence that a trash chute system exists.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Community/shared laundry is clearly present in the building. At least three listings explicitly mention it (e.g., 'The building offers a community laundry,' 'Easily accessible to laundry room,' and 'Community laundry and guest parking included'), and all 8 current MLS entries have the community laundry amenity checked. The language used appears independently written across multiple agents, indicating this is a real, building-wide feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 8 current MLS listings indicate parking, and 7/8 remarks describe unit stalls (e.g., '1-assigned parking stall', '1-parking unit', '1 dedicated parking stall'). Evidence is consistent across multiple units and agents, confirming that the building provides parking for residents.
No analysis available
Covered parking is directly mentioned in multiple remarks (e.g., '1 covered assigned parking stall', 'parking (covered)') and 5/8 MLS entries check covered/garage options. This supports that the building offers covered parking for at least some units.
Across listings, each unit is described as coming with its own assigned or dedicated parking stall, implying the stall is included in the property rights for that unit. While the word 'deeded' is not used, the consistent 'comes with' and 'assigned/dedicated stall' language supports treating parking as deeded/owned with the unit.
No analysis available
Listings consistently state that the units have an assigned or dedicated parking stall but never state a separate monthly fee for parking. I searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'rent parking', and similar terms and found none, so any parking fee amount is unknown.
Guest parking is consistently described in the remarks (e.g., 'guest parking available', 'guest stalls', 'guest parking near by', 'guest parking included') and appears in 7/8 MLS parking feature sets. This provides strong building-level evidence that guest parking is available.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks describe assigned and guest parking but do not mention any system of waiting lists for stalls. I specifically looked for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list for parking', or similar phrases and found nothing, so a waitlist is treated as not present based on current information.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings confirm the presence of window air conditioning: one unit description notes a "brand new window A/C in the bedroom" and another mentions "window AC." Additionally, 7 out of 8 current MLS listings check the window AC inclusion box, suggesting this is a common and permitted feature in the building rather than an isolated case. Buyers seeking units with window AC would reasonably consider this building as offering that option.
Four of eight recent MLS listings for Kulanui Hale check concrete in the construction materials. Combined with the 1995 build date, presence of an elevator, and fire sprinklers, this strongly suggests a concrete-structured building even though remarks do not explicitly say 'concrete construction.'
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Single wall construction is noted in just 1 of 8 listings and is never mentioned in any remarks, which instead describe a 1995, sprinklered elevator building. This strongly indicates the single-wall flag is a mistaken checkbox entry, so the building should not be considered single-wall construction.
The building is presented as a residential condo near UH with no hotel-style or vacation-rental language. I searched for terms such as 'short-term rental', 'vacation rental', 'legal STR', 'NUC', and 'TVU' and found none, so short-term rentals are assumed not allowed based solely on the remarks.
None of the listings reference a hotel program, hotel branding, or a rental pool, which would typically be highlighted if present. Given the purely residential positioning and lack of STR indications, participation in a hotel rental pool is treated as not present.
Listings emphasize owner-occupant and investment use but never state that owners must place units in any rental or hotel program. I looked for phrases like 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate in rental program', or 'must be in rental pool' and found none, so mandatory pool participation is considered not applicable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All listings describe the units and building without referencing a land lease or leasehold structure. I looked for phrases like 'lease expires', 'leasehold', 'ground lease ends', and specific years but found nothing, so the lease expiry year cannot be determined.
The remarks focus on location, renovations, and parking but never reference VA loan eligibility or VA approval. I searched for terms like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', and 'VA loans' and found none, so VA approval is treated as not present based on available text.
The listings do not discuss HOA or building insurance coverage at all. Because fully insured status is only determined from explicit language, this is assumed not present by default.
No analysis available
The building clearly has fire sprinklers, but there is no statement that a formal fire/life safety evaluation (FLSE) was completed or passed. In the absence of explicit phrases like 'FLSE passed' or 'passed fire inspection', this field is set to false by default.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Among current listings, 3 of 8 have the CITY view descriptor checked, while 1 explicitly notes no view, suggesting a mix of outlooks within the building. Remarks mention views of St. Louis Heights, Manoa Valley, and Palolo stream but do not specifically say “city view,” so the case for city views relies mainly on the MLS view field. Given that buyers search for buildings offering any city-view units, this is treated as a building feature even though only some units likely have it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.