Kulanui Hale
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kulanui Hale
Building Overview
Kulanui Hale in Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis; concrete building (1995) with mountain views and pets allowed.
About Kulanui Hale
Based on MLS data, Kulanui Hale is a residential building located in the Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1995 and is of concrete construction. Specific unit sizes and number of units are not provided in the available MLS information.
According to available records, Kulanui Hale offers mountain views and uses window air conditioning in units. The building has one elevator and permits pets. Short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS data provided.
MLS data indicates parking is available with covered, assigned stalls and guest parking. The management company is listed as unknown in the provided records. Buyers should verify all details, including fees, unit sizes, parking assignments, pet rules, and management, with their agent or the managing entity.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for numeric owner-occupancy references like "80% owner occupied" as well as qualitative phrases such as "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." The remarks do not provide a building-wide owner-occupancy rate. An "original owner unit" appears in one listing, but that is not enough to estimate the overall percentage.
The remarks clearly confirm elevator service in the building. Because the current value is already 1 and there is no explicit mention of multiple elevators, I am keeping it at 1. The evidence supports elevator access but not a higher elevator count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
7 of 9 current listings list OTCOEX in association_fee_includes. Remarks note "Units are sub-metered for electric useage added to the maintenance fee," suggesting meter arrangement for unit electric but not disproving building/common electricity inclusion. Evidence is consistent across multiple listings/agents but somewhat mixed in remarks, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
8 of 9 current listings list HOTWAT in association_fee_includes, but 2 listings include WTRHTR (water heater) which implies some units generate their own hot water. No public remarks explicitly state "hot water included." Overall MLS checkbox prevalence is strong but remarks are silent/mixed, so include hot water with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 9 current listings list SEWER in association_fee_includes; prior summaries also showed strong consistency (previously High confidence). No remarks contradict this, so evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents/listings.
All 9 current listings list WATER in association_fee_includes, and historical data showed WATER consistently included. Remarks mention community laundry and building amenities but do not contradict water inclusion, so the evidence across listings is strong.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings describe unit-specific outdoor spaces, including a ground floor unit with a "rear lanai off of bedroom" and another with a "useable courtyard," confirming that at least some units have patio/deck-type areas. MLS checkbox data (6 of 8 listings with PATDEC/COVPAT) aligns with these remarks, suggesting agents consistently recognize outdoor living spaces at this property. Buyers seeking units with lanais or courtyards would reasonably consider this building for that feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Seven of nine current MLS listings list the TRACHU (trash chute) amenity, supporting inclusion of a trash chute at the building. However, none of the public remarks across the listings mention a trash or garbage chute, suggesting the evidence comes from MLS checkbox entries (potentially copy/pasted by agents). Given consistent checklist presence but absence from remarks, confidence is moderate (0.78).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
High confidence that the building has shared/community laundry. At least three separate listings explicitly state 'community laundry' or 'laundry room' (quotes: 'The building offers a community laundry', 'Easily accessible to laundry room', 'Community laundry and guest parking included'), and the MLS amenity checkbox is set on all 9 listings, indicating consistent reporting across agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 8 current MLS listings indicate parking, and 7/8 remarks describe unit stalls (e.g., '1-assigned parking stall', '1-parking unit', '1 dedicated parking stall'). Evidence is consistent across multiple units and agents, confirming that the building provides parking for residents.
Strong evidence that the building offers assigned parking: 8 of 9 listings indicate ASSIGN in MLS and numerous remarks explicitly say 'assigned parking' or '1 assigned/1 dedicated parking stall' (e.g., 'one covered, assigned parking stall', '1-assigned parking stall', 'assigned parking'). Mentions appear across multiple agent remarks rather than being isolated to a single listing.
Clear evidence the building has covered parking: 6 of 9 MLS listings show covered parking codes and remarks include specific phrases like 'one covered, assigned parking stall', '1 covered assigned parking stall', and 'parking (covered)'. The covered parking references appear across multiple listings and align with prior high-confidence data.
The listings repeatedly describe the parking as assigned, covered, or dedicated. I did not find explicit language like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed," so I cannot call it deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for any separate monthly parking charge, parking rental, or parking fee language. The remarks only say the unit has assigned/dedicated parking and guest parking, with no fee stated.
Strong, consistent evidence of guest parking: 8 of 9 MLS listings include GUEST and numerous remarks state 'guest parking available', 'guest stalls', or 'guest parking near by' (e.g., 'guest parking available', 'guest stalls', 'guest parking included'), appearing across multiple agent listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for "parking waitlist," "waiting list," or similar wording. Nothing in the remarks indicates a parking waitlist system, only that parking is assigned or dedicated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that some units have window air conditioning: the MLS inclusion ACWIUN is checked in 8 of 9 recent listings and at least three separate public-remarks entries explicitly state 'brand new window A/C in the bedroom', 'window AC', or 'AC and ceiling fan'. Multiple agents' remarks and the persistent MLS checkbox across listings indicate this is a building-level feature offered in some units rather than an isolated error.
Four of eight recent MLS listings for Kulanui Hale check concrete in the construction materials. Combined with the 1995 build date, presence of an elevator, and fire sprinklers, this strongly suggests a concrete-structured building even though remarks do not explicitly say 'concrete construction.'
8 out of 9 current MLS listings list 'DOUWAL' (double wall) in construction materials, but none of the public remarks explicitly reference 'double wall' or similar phrasing. Because the checkbox is present across most listings, the feature is included with fairly strong implied support (confidence 0.80), though descriptive confirmation in remarks is lacking and agent copy/paste remains possible.
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 out of 9 current MLS listings list 'STEFRA' (steel frame) in construction materials, but none of the public remarks mention 'steel' or 'steel frame'. Evidence comes primarily from MLS checkbox entries across multiple listings rather than descriptive agent remarks, so presence is plausible but not strongly corroborated; assigned a moderate confidence (0.75).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Single wall construction is noted in just 1 of 8 listings and is never mentioned in any remarks, which instead describe a 1995, sprinklered elevator building. This strongly indicates the single-wall flag is a mistaken checkbox entry, so the building should not be considered single-wall construction.
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR permitted, vacation rental allowed, NUC, or TVU, and found none. The remarks do mention long-term/investor use, but that is not evidence of STR allowance.
I looked for hotel pool terms like hotel rental pool, hotel program, Hilton pool, or branded managed rental operations. No such language appears in the remarks, and there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed here.
I searched for wording such as mandatory pool, required participation, or cannot opt out, and found nothing. Since there is no evidence of an STR or hotel pool program, there is also no basis to mark mandatory participation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold wording such as "lease expires," "ground lease," "land lease," or any 4-digit expiration year. The remarks do not mention lease tenure or an expiry year, so this remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for VA-related language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted." None of the listings mention VA eligibility, so there is no public evidence to mark the building as VA approved.
I looked for explicit insurance language like fully insured, full insurance, fully covered insurance, comprehensive building insurance, and walls-in coverage. Nothing in the public remarks confirms that the HOA provides full building insurance. Without a direct statement, this remains unverified.
Evidence that the building has fire sprinklers includes 5/9 current MLS listings with the FIRSPR amenity checked and at least two public remarks explicitly stating 'building ... with fire sprinklers' and 'Each unit is equipped with fire sprinklers.' Multiple agents/remarks mention the feature and the MLS checkbox is set in a majority of listings, so the feature is likely accurate (though some agent copy/paste cannot be fully ruled out).
I searched the remarks for wording such as fire/life safety evaluation passed, FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, and passed fire inspection. I found references to fire sprinklers, which are helpful but are not the same as an explicit evaluation pass. Based on the public remarks alone, there is no direct evidence that the building passed FLSE.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS metadata shows 6 of 9 current listings with the CITY view descriptor, while 1 lists NONE. None of the provided public remarks explicitly state 'city view' or 'downtown view' (remarks reference Manoa/St. Louis Heights views and Palolo stream), so the CITY view is indicated by MLS fields rather than clear agent descriptions. Confidence is moderate (implied from multiple MLS entries) and the evidence may reflect checkbox usage across some units rather than consistent remark confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.