Kulanui Hale
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kulanui Hale
Building Overview
Kulanui Hale in Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis; concrete building (1995) with mountain views and pets allowed.
About Kulanui Hale
Based on MLS data, Kulanui Hale is a residential building located in the Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1995 and is of concrete construction. Specific unit sizes and number of units are not provided in the available MLS information.
According to available records, Kulanui Hale offers mountain views and uses window air conditioning in units. The building has one elevator and permits pets. Short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS data provided.
MLS data indicates parking is available with covered, assigned stalls and guest parking. The management company is listed as unknown in the provided records. Buyers should verify all details, including fees, unit sizes, parking assignments, pet rules, and management, with their agent or the managing entity.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for numeric owner-occupancy references such as "80% owner occupied" as well as qualitative descriptions like "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." The remarks only mention an "original owner unit," which is about one unit and not the building-wide occupancy rate, so the building-level owner-occupancy percentage remains unknown.
The public remarks clearly confirm elevator service in the building. I looked specifically for phrases like "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," or any other count greater than one, but found none. The current value of 1 is well supported.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Most current listings (8 of 10) carry OTCOEX in association fees, and the remarks include a note that electric usage is "added to the maintenance fee." That suggests electricity-related common costs are being passed through in dues, though the wording is not a perfect match for common-area electricity. Overall this looks like a real building-level fee inclusion, but the evidence is moderately strong rather than absolute.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water appears in 9 of 10 current MLS records as HOTWAT, which is very strong evidence that maintenance fees include hot water. A small minority of listings also mention WTRHTR, so there is some inconsistency, but the overall pattern heavily favors inclusion. No remarks explicitly contradict the HOTWAT field.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is extremely well supported: all 10 current listings show SEWER in the fee inclusions. This is consistent with prior high-confidence history and there are no remarks suggesting otherwise. The evidence is strong enough to treat this as a stable building-level feature.
Water inclusion is confirmed across all 10 current listings, making this a very stable building-level feature. The historical record also showed consistent WATER inclusion, and nothing in the remarks suggests a change. Confidence is extremely high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings describe unit-specific outdoor spaces, including a ground floor unit with a "rear lanai off of bedroom" and another with a "useable courtyard," confirming that at least some units have patio/deck-type areas. MLS checkbox data (6 of 8 listings with PATDEC/COVPAT) aligns with these remarks, suggesting agents consistently recognize outdoor living spaces at this property. Buyers seeking units with lanais or courtyards would reasonably consider this building for that feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The trash chute feature is supported by both MLS checkbox data and the remarks. One listing explicitly mentions a "trash chute," while current MLS data shows 8 of 10 listings checked TRACHU, which is consistent across multiple agents and not just a one-off copy-paste pattern.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has shared laundry facilities. At least 4 listings explicitly mention it using phrases such as "community laundry" and "laundry room," and the current remarks are consistent with the historical MLS amenities data showing COMLAU in all listings. This appears to be a stable, building-level feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 8 current MLS listings indicate parking, and 7/8 remarks describe unit stalls (e.g., '1-assigned parking stall', '1-parking unit', '1 dedicated parking stall'). Evidence is consistent across multiple units and agents, confirming that the building provides parking for residents.
Assigned/reserved parking is clearly present at Kulanui Hale. Multiple remarks across many listings explicitly say "assigned parking," "1-assigned parking stall," "one covered, assigned parking stall," and "1 dedicated parking stall," matching the high-confidence MLS pattern. This looks consistent across agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
Covered parking is well supported for this building. Several remarks directly use "covered parking" wording, and others pair it with assigned stalls, confirming that the parking is not just assigned but also covered in multiple listings. Evidence is consistent across listings and aligns with the MLS codes.
I searched for explicit deeded-parking language like 'deeded parking,' 'owned stall,' or 'parking included in deed' and did not find it. The remarks consistently say assigned or dedicated parking, which suggests parking is included but not necessarily deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for any separate parking charge, parking rental, or monthly parking fee in the remarks. The listings only mention assigned, covered, or guest parking and do not provide any fee information.
Guest parking appears to be a shared building feature at Kulanui Hale. Multiple listings mention it directly, including "guest parking available," "guest stalls," "guest parking near by," and "guest parking included," which strongly supports the MLS data. The repeated mentions across different remarks suggest this is a real amenity, not a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like 'parking waitlist,' 'parking waiting list,' or 'join waitlist for parking' and found nothing. The remarks describe available assigned/guest parking, not a waitlist process.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building offers window air conditioning in some units. At least 3 listings explicitly say "brand new window A/C in the bedroom," "window AC," and one also mentions "AC and ceiling fan," which aligns with the repeated MLS ACWIUN checkbox activity. This does not look like a one-off copy/paste error; it appears consistently across multiple remarks and agents.
Concrete construction appears in 5 of 10 current MLS listings via the CONCRE checkbox. Public remarks do not explicitly mention concrete, but the repeated MLS pattern plus the prior medium-confidence note supports including it for the building.
8 out of 9 current MLS listings list 'DOUWAL' (double wall) in construction materials, but none of the public remarks explicitly reference 'double wall' or similar phrasing. Because the checkbox is present across most listings, the feature is included with fairly strong implied support (confidence 0.80), though descriptive confirmation in remarks is lacking and agent copy/paste remains possible.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Steel frame construction is indicated in 5 of 10 current MLS listings through the STEFRA checkbox. The remarks are silent on steel, so this looks like MLS data rather than narrative confirmation, but the repeated checkbox evidence is strong enough to include.
Concrete slab construction appears in only 2 of 10 current MLS listings and is not mentioned in the public remarks. This is weaker than the other construction indicators and may reflect inconsistent MLS entry, but it is still enough to tentatively surface the feature with low confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Single wall construction is noted in just 1 of 8 listings and is never mentioned in any remarks, which instead describe a 1995, sprinklered elevator building. This strongly indicates the single-wall flag is a mistaken checkbox entry, so the building should not be considered single-wall construction.
I looked for explicit short-term rental indicators such as 'STR permitted,' 'vacation rental allowed,' 'NUC,' or 'TVU,' and found none. The remarks instead emphasize owner-occupant, investor, and rental appeal in a general sense, which is not enough to confirm STR allowance.
I searched for hotel pool language like 'hotel rental pool,' 'hotel program,' or branded management such as Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool participation. There is no such language in the remarks, and STR itself is not evidenced either.
I looked for wording such as 'mandatory pool,' 'must participate,' or 'cannot opt out' and found nothing. Since there is no evidence of a hotel rental program or STR allowance, there is also no basis for a mandatory pool requirement.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold wording such as 'lease expires,' 'ground lease,' 'land lease,' or a 4-digit expiration year. Nothing in the remarks suggests this building is leasehold or provides any lease expiry date.
I searched the public remarks for any VA-related language such as 'VA approved,' 'VA financing,' or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. The listings only describe the building as secure, renovated, and conveniently located, so there is no evidence supporting VA eligibility.
I looked for explicit insurance wording like "fully insured," "full insurance," "walls-in coverage," or similar HOA insurance language. Nothing in the remarks addresses building insurance, so there is no evidence to support this feature.
Strong evidence that Kulanui Hale has fire sprinklers. At least 2 remarks explicitly mention 'fire sprinklers' / 'fire sprinklered building,' and the MLS data shows 6/10 current listings with the FIRSPR amenity checked. This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
I searched for explicit FLSE language such as "fire/life safety evaluation passed," "FLSE passed," or "passed fire inspection." None of those phrases appeared. The repeated mention of fire sprinklers suggests fire/life safety compliance, so I’m leaning true but with only medium confidence because the remarks do not directly confirm an FLSE pass.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain-view evidence appears in a minority of listings, but it is present in the MLS data and supported by one remark describing "St. Louis Heights" and a "rainbow backdrop over Manoa Valley." Most other remarks are silent on views, so this looks like a real but not universally advertised building feature rather than copy-paste across all listings.
No analysis available
MLS metadata shows 6 of 9 current listings with the CITY view descriptor, while 1 lists NONE. None of the provided public remarks explicitly state 'city view' or 'downtown view' (remarks reference Manoa/St. Louis Heights views and Palolo stream), so the CITY view is indicated by MLS fields rather than clear agent descriptions. Confidence is moderate (implied from multiple MLS entries) and the evidence may reflect checkbox usage across some units rather than consistent remark confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no remark-based evidence for an on-site resident manager in the listings provided. The feature appears only once in MLS amenities (1/10) and is not corroborated by any public description, so it is likely a copy-paste or unverified entry rather than a true building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.