Kulana Knolls 2
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kulana Knolls 2
Building Overview
Kulana Knolls 2 in Waipahu — built 1994; pets allowed; short-term rentals not permitted.
About Kulana Knolls 2
Based on MLS data, Kulana Knolls 2 is a residential building located in the Waipahu neighborhood, built in 1994. Specific details on building size (number of units) and construction type are not provided in the available MLS records.
According to available records, the property allows pets and does not permit short-term rentals. No additional amenities (such as a pool, gym, or community facilities) are listed in the MLS data supplied.
Additional details commonly important to buyers — including parking arrangements, HOA or maintenance fees, and the management company — are not specified in the MLS information (management company listed as Unknown). Prospective buyers should verify parking, fee, and policy information with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Searched for explicit owner-occupancy percentages or descriptors (e.g., '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied', 'highly owner occupied') across all public remarks. No numeric or qualitative owner-occupancy information appears. Because this is a numeric field with no prior value and no explicit evidence in the remarks, the value is unknown (null) with low confidence.
Searched the public remarks for explicit elevator counts or mentions (e.g., '4 elevators', 'multiple elevators', 'elevator access'). The listings repeatedly emphasize ground-floor, single-level living, and lack of stairs for those units, but do not state any elevator presence or count. In absence of any explicit mention and with no prior data, set to false with medium confidence (absence in remarks likely indicates none).
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
11 of 16 current listings include OTCOEX (common area electricity) in association_fee_includes. No public remarks explicitly confirm or deny this and language across listings appears largely copy/pasted, so evidence is moderate rather than definitive. Multiple agents have checked the box across listings, suggesting the building likely includes common area electric in HOA fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 16 listings lack HOTWAT in association_fee_includes while 13 of 16 list WTRHTR (water heater) in inclusions; remarks explicitly reference a new water heater and in-unit water heater replacements. This strongly indicates hot water is provided by individual unit heaters and not included in HOA fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 16 current listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes. There are no public-remark indications contradicting this, and the unanimous MLS entries provide strong, consistent evidence that sewer is included in the HOA/association fees.
All 16 listings include WATER in association_fee_includes. Although remarks mention a newly installed water line, none state water is excluded; the consistent MLS data across listings provides strong evidence that water is included in the association fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although only one MLS checkbox is checked for clubhouse, multiple remarks reference a “recreation center” and on-site community amenities (e.g., “Enjoy the recreation center”), which reasonably indicate a clubhouse/community center-type facility is present; mentions are implied rather than widespread.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both MLS checkbox data (9 of 16 listings) and numerous agent remarks reference outdoor living areas: examples include "covered porch," "covered lanai," and "private lanai." Mentions appear across multiple listings and agents rather than being a single copy-paste, supporting inclusion of a patio/deck amenity at the building level.
While 7 of 16 MLS listings have a walking/jogging path checkbox checked, no public remarks mention a jogging or walking path or similar phrasing. The lack of any agent remark describing a path suggests the MLS checkbox entries may be copy/paste errors, so the feature is omitted pending stronger confirmation.
No analysis available
MLS data (6 of 16 listings) and multiple public remarks explicitly mention private outdoor areas: "private courtyard," "grassy courtyard," "enclosed yard," and "private, fenced yard." These consistent, repeated remarks across different listings/agents indicate the building offers private yard space for some units.
No analysis available
There are multiple remarks referencing a recreation center, playgrounds, parks and open grassy spaces (e.g., “recreation center,” “playground areas,” “two playgrounds and open grassy spaces”), and MLS checkbox prevalence (8/16) further supports that the building offers shared recreation areas.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple MLS entries indicate storage (3 of 16 in building-level amenities; 4 of 16 in unit features), and one public remark explicitly states "exterior storage space." Evidence is not widespread across agent remarks and may reflect selective unit-level storage or copy/paste, so inclusion is recommended with moderate confidence (0.75).
No analysis available
MLS shows 4 of 16 listings with tennis court checked and public remarks include the phrase “recreation center, basketball, tennis courts and park.” Only one distinct remarks block explicitly names tennis courts, so evidence exists but is limited across agents and may reflect partial copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 16 current MLS listings list WASHER/DRYER in the inclusions, and at least 7 separate public-remarks entries explicitly mention phrases like "in-unit washer and dryer", "in-unit laundry", and "full-size front-load washer/dryer". Evidence is consistent across multiple listings/agents and aligns with the MLS checkbox, so the building should be marked as offering in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Majority of listings (11/16 in MLS checkbox) indicate assigned parking and numerous public remarks explicitly state assigned/reserved spaces, with phrases like "2 assigned parking stalls", "two reserved parking spaces", and "2 designated parking stalls" appearing across multiple listings. The consistency across different remarks and the MLS checkbox majority make the presence of assigned parking likely for this building, though some listings generically mention "2 parking" or "open parking stalls," suggesting occasional agent variance or copy/paste.
No analysis available
There is consistent mention of assigned/reserved parking stalls but no explicit language indicating parking is deeded (owned with the unit). Therefore deeded parking is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'additional parking cost' and similar phrases; none were present, so no parking fee information is available from the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking waitlist' or 'waiting list' language; absent from the public remarks, so no evidence supports a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
12 of 16 current listings have the DOUWAL construction checkbox checked, and one public remark explicitly reads "double wall construction for added privacy and sound insulation." The prevalence of the MLS checkbox across multiple listings plus an explicit agent remark provides strong evidence the building features double-wall construction, though some agent copy/paste is possible.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'short-term rental', 'vacation rental', 'STR', '30-day minimum', 'NUC', and related terms; none were found. In absence of any mention, STR allowance is treated as not supported by the remarks.
Because STR is not indicated in the remarks and no hotel pool/program language appears (e.g., 'hotel rental pool', 'managed by hotel'), hotel pool participation is not supported.
No remarks indicate participation in a rental pool, let alone mandatory enrollment. Therefore mandatory pool participation is not supported by the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease', 'leasehold' and specific years; nothing was found in the provided public remarks, so lease expiry year is unknown.
Several listings explicitly reference VA approval/assumable VA loans for units in this building. This is strong evidence the building accepts VA financing.
Searched the remarks for HOA insurance/walls-in coverage language (e.g., 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', 'comprehensive building insurance'). The listings do not mention the association carrying full building/walls-in insurance. With no explicit statements and no prior data, set to false with medium confidence (absence in remarks suggests not stated).
No analysis available
Searched the remarks for explicit FLSE/fire life safety language (e.g., 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'passed fire inspection'). There are no references to fire/life safety evaluations or certifications in any listing. With no explicit statements and no prior data, set to false with medium confidence (no evidence in public remarks).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/16) mention SUNSET in view_descriptions and three list NONE. Public remarks do not explicitly state sunset or western exposure; agents mention 'morning sun' and general 'views of Diamond Head and the ocean' in isolated remarks but no direct reference to sunset or evening views. Evidence is consistent across listings and appears to lack any agent-confirmed sunset feature, so the building is reported as not offering sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data indicates 10 of 16 current listings list a resident/on-site manager. Public remarks include explicit references such as 'gated complex with an on-site office' and 'gated community features ... resident manager,' showing the feature is mentioned across different listings and agents. Evidence is moderate (multiple agents/remarks plus majority-of-listings checkbox) but not yet overwhelming, so confidence is set at 0.80.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.