Kukui Plaza
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kukui Plaza
Building Overview
Kukui Plaza in Downtown-Chinatown (1976), concrete construction with pool and ocean/Diamond Head views.
About Kukui Plaza
Kukui Plaza is a residential building located in the Downtown–Chinatown neighborhood. According to available records, it was built in 1976 and is constructed of concrete. Specific unit size and total number of units are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, building amenities include a pool, BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. Units are shown with window air conditioning. Reported views from the building include ocean, mountain, Diamond Head, and sunset aspects.
Parking details listed in MLS data indicate available covered, assigned parking with guest parking on site. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown and no fee details are provided in the MLS summary. Buyers should verify all information and current policies with the listing agent or management prior to purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit percentages or phrases indicating owner-occupancy rates (e.g., '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied'). Remarks include individual notes of long-term owner occupancy for some units but no building-wide percentage; per rules I will not infer a numeric percentage without an explicit remark.
I searched all public remarks for explicit elevator counts or phrases like '4 elevators', 'four elevators', or 'multiple elevators'. While the remarks mention 'lobby/elevators' and elevator access, there is no explicit number given. Per rules, I will not guess a numeric value without an explicit statement.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
High-confidence evidence: 17/20 MLS records list CABTV historically and numerous agent remarks across the provided listings explicitly state "basic cable" or "cable" is included in the maintenance fee (e.g., "maintenance fee includes...basic cable"). Mentions appear in multiple independent remarks and are consistent with MLS checkbox data, indicating building-level inclusion of cable in HOA fees.
14 of 20 current MLS records list OTCOEX (implied coverage of common-area electricity). Public remarks do not explicitly say 'common area electricity' and many agent remarks appear duplicated across listings, so evidence is implied rather than directly stated across agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
High-confidence evidence: 14/20 MLS records list HOTWAT historically and many agent remarks directly state that hot water is included in the maintenance fee (quotes include "hot water"). The consistency across listings and absence of unit-level water heater (WTRHTR) listings support inclusion at the building level.
High-confidence evidence: 14/20 MLS records historically list INTSER and numerous agent remarks across the dataset explicitly say "internet included" or "includes internet," often paired with cable/water/sewer, indicating building-level internet service is covered by HOA/maintenance fees.
No analysis available
Conclusive-high confidence: All 20 MLS records historically list SEWER and public remarks explicitly note that maintenance fees cover sewer (e.g., "maintenance fees cover water, sewer, internet, and cable"). Consistent evidence across all listings and remarks supports including sewer as part of HOA fees.
Conclusive-high confidence: All 20 MLS records historically list WATER and numerous public remarks explicitly confirm water is included in the HOA/maintenance fees (quotes include "maintenance fees cover water"). Evidence is strong and consistent across multiple listings and agents.
Very strong, consistent evidence: nearly every remark references BBQ facilities (e.g., 'BBQ areas', 'barbecue grills', 'multiple BBQ grills', 'BBQ stations'). Mentions appear across many different agent remarks and listings, indicating a building-level shared amenity rather than isolated copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate-to-strong evidence: multiple remarks explicitly reference a pavilion/gazebo/recreation pavilion or covered entertainment space suitable as a clubhouse/community gathering area (quotes include 'party pavilion', 'covered pavilion with bathrooms', 'recreation pavilion with kitchen & restrooms'), indicating a shared clubhouse-style amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence: many listings mention meeting/party rooms or reservable meeting areas (e.g., 'party/meeting room', 'meeting rooms', 'reserve party or meeting areas'), indicating building-level meeting/conference spaces available to residents.
Multiple listings (at least 12 separate public-remarks entries) explicitly mention unit lanais / covered lanais and building-level decks ("recreation deck", "garden deck", "covered lanai", "145 sq. ft. lanai") as well as covered gazebos/pavilions and BBQ areas on the amenity deck. Evidence is consistent across many agents and listing texts (not just a single copy/paste), indicating the building offers both private lanais on some units and shared patio/deck amenity spaces.
Strong, consistent evidence: many listings explicitly cite walking or jogging paths (phrases like 'walking paths', 'jogging path', 'scenic walking paths along koi ponds', 'jogging path goes around the park'), confirming building-level walking/jogging routes.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across many listings: at least a dozen remarks explicitly reference a recreation deck/area or private park (phrases like 'private park', 'recreation deck', 'large amenity deck', 'recreation pavilion'), showing a consistent building-level recreation area amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no evidence in the remarks of dedicated surfboard or board storage; searches for related terms returned no matches.
No analysis available
Weak to no evidence in public remarks: none of the reviewed listings mention 'trash chute', 'garbage chute' or 'refuse chute'. Historical MLS checkbox presence was mixed/low-confidence. Given lack of any explicit remark confirming a chute, there is insufficient support in agent remarks to validate this amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
High confidence that the building has pool amenities: remarks in nearly every listing mention pool(s) — phrases quoted include "swimming pool", "heated pool", "wading pool", and "kids' splash pool." This consistent, explicit language appears across multiple agents' remarks and corroborates the historical MLS checkbox (19/20), indicating a real, building-level amenity rather than isolated copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No public remarks indicate the pool is salt-water; descriptions mention heated pool, wading pool, kiddie pool, but no salt/saltwater language.
Multiple listings explicitly state 'in‑unit washer and dryer' or 'washer and dryer in the unit' (at least a dozen occurrences in the public remarks), with several listings noting that only certain unit types (e.g., 2‑bedrooms/corner units) have full W/Ds. Historical MLS data showed strong building‑level evidence for in‑unit laundry; current remarks continue to confirm that some units offer this feature.
Strong, consistent evidence that the building has shared laundry facilities: MLS checkbox history shows 18/20 listings with COMLAU and numerous public remarks explicitly state community laundry on every floor (e.g., 'community laundry is available on every floor', 'community laundry located on each floor', 'community laundry on each floor with two washers & two dryers'). Mentions appear across multiple agents and listings rather than isolated copy-paste, supporting a high-confidence inclusion of this building-level amenity.
There is no evidence in the public remarks that the community laundry requires payment (coin-op/card). Many listings mention washers/dryers and laundry locations but do not specify payment or coin/card operation.
Public remarks repeatedly and explicitly state community laundry facilities on every floor (mentions across many listings: "community laundry is located on each floor", "community laundry on every floor").
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that the building offers assigned parking: current MLS data indicates 17 of 20 listings mark assigned parking and many remarks explicitly say phrases like '1 assigned parking stall' or 'assigned, covered parking stall'. The language appears across many agent listings (not a single outlier), supporting high confidence.
Strong evidence the building provides covered parking: current MLS showed 19/20 listings with covered/garage flags and the public remarks repeatedly mention 'covered parking', 'covered, assigned parking stall', 'covered garage' and similar phrases across many unit listings (multiple agents/ads). This is consistent and appears to be a building-wide feature rather than isolated entries.
Many listings describe parking as assigned/covered and explicitly call parking 'fee simple' or discuss purchase of stalls, indicating parking stalls are deeded/owned with units or available for purchase. I searched for 'deeded parking', 'fee simple parking', 'purchased stall', and 'assigned parking' and found multiple explicit mentions.
No analysis available
I searched for 'monthly parking fee', '$', 'monthly charge', and similar phrases. Listings mention assigned/covered or fee-simple parking and 'monthly public parking in the complex' but do not state a specific monthly parking fee, so the parking fee is unknown from remarks.
Moderate support: 5 of 20 current listings include guest parking and at least some remarks mention 'guest parking' (e.g., '24 hrs security, guest parking, laundry on each floor' and 'plenty of guest parking' in agent copy). Evidence is present but less widespread than assigned/covered stalls.
Good evidence the parking has secured entry: while the MLS secured-entry checkbox appeared on ~10/20 listings, the public remarks in this dataset repeatedly mention 'secured parking', 'secure parking & building entry', 'entrance to the parking garage is secured', 'secured covered parking stall' and 'gated/secured garage' in many unit listings (over a dozen listings), indicating secured access is a building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched all remarks for 'waitlist', 'waiting list', 'join waitlist', and related terms and found no evidence of a parking waitlist system. Absence of mention suggests none, but not definitive.
No analysis available
Building is described as secured with keyed entry and 24/7 on-site security, but there is no explicit mention of card/fob/keycard electronic access in the public remarks.
Historical MLS data indicates 18/20 listings included SECGUA, and current public remarks consistently mention security (e.g., "24-hour security", "24/7 security", "on-site security guards", "24 hr security patrol"). Multiple agent remarks across the listings reference the same security service, so evidence is strong and consistent that the building provides security guard service.
Listings consistently describe robust security (24-hour/on-site guards, security patrol and video), supporting a high-confidence true for security patrol/service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence that units at Kukui Plaza have window air conditioning: 19 of 20 current MLS inclusions list ACWIUN and many listing remarks explicitly state "window AC unit in the living room", "new window A/C", or "new window AC units". Mentions appear across multiple agent listings (not isolated to one agent), indicating the feature is widespread rather than a single copy/paste error.
Strong evidence the building is concrete: 18 of 20 recent MLS listings list construction_materials as 'CONCRE'. Public remarks across many agents consistently describe a large, multi-story secured complex with elevated recreation decks and pool areas but do not contradict concrete construction (no remarks state timber/wood or other materials). The high and consistent checkbox presence across listings suggests the feature is accurate rather than an isolated agent error.
Double-wall construction appears in 5 of 20 current MLS listings ('DOUWAL'), but none of the public remarks mention "double wall" or "double-wall construction." Historical processing previously flagged this feature High, so it is included here, but evidence is limited to a minority of MLS checkbox entries and lacks corroborating language in agent remarks.
No analysis available
Only 4 of 20 current MLS entries list 'MASSTU' and there are no public-remarks phrases referencing masonry or stucco in any listing. Given the low historical confidence and absence of supporting remarks, masonry/stucco construction is unlikely, though MLS checkbox usage is inconsistent so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
Only 3 of 20 current MLS entries list 'SLAB' and historical confidence for slab was Low; none of the public remarks mention "concrete slab" or "solid concrete foundation." Given the low historical support and absence of corroborating remarks across listings, slab foundation is unlikely and omitted (treated as a correction of probable agent checkbox error).
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historical processing indicated High confidence that the building is above-ground construction and the property is repeatedly described as a high-rise/residential tower across listings. Only 5 of 20 current MLS entries explicitly check 'ABOGRO' and public remarks do not mention the phrase, so evidence is implied across listings rather than explicitly stated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR language (e.g., 'short-term rental allowed', 'vacation rental', 'TVU', 'NUC', '30-day minimum') and found none. Several listings market to investors or reference 'vacation home' as a sales pitch, but no explicit policy allowing STRs is present in the remarks; therefore STR allowed is set false with medium confidence.
I searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', specific hotel brands, and managed-hotel language and found no evidence. Because short-term rentals are not indicated as allowed in remarks, hotel pool participation is set to false.
I searched for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', 'must be in rental program', and related terms and found none. Given no evidence of a hotel pool or STR allowance, mandatory participation is set to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings reference a sandwich lease and multiple entries note the seller will pay off the sandwich lease so buyer will get fee simple; one listing explicitly gives the lease expiry year as 2048. I used that explicit year as the lease expiry.
Multiple listings explicitly reference VA approval and VA-assumable loans, indicating the building/units are VA eligible. I searched for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA assumable', and 'VA loan' and found direct statements in the remarks.
I searched for insurance-related wording and found several explicit mentions across listings declaring the building fully insured (walls-in type coverage). Under the rules, explicit mentions yield a true value with high confidence.
MLS checkbox data shows 5 of 20 current listings listing fire sprinklers (and historical analysis previously indicated high confidence), but 0 public remarks mention 'fire sprinkler' or similar. The evidence is limited to MLS checkbox entries across some listings and is not corroborated in agent remarks, suggesting possible copy/paste or inconsistent agent reporting.
I searched the remarks for explicit language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation (terms like 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', 'passed fire inspection'). There were no such references in any listing, so there is no evidence the FLSE pass is publicly stated in the remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Both historical records and the current listing remarks strongly indicate the building offers ocean views. At least 15 separate listing remarks in the dataset explicitly mention ocean or harbor views (quotes include "ocean and harbor views", "glistening ocean beyond", "beautiful Ocean ... views"). The evidence is consistent across many listings and agents (though some phrasing repeats, it consistently advertises ocean views).
Mountain views are well-documented in both historical and current remarks. At least 15 listings in the dataset mention mountain or mauka views (quotes include "majestic mountains", "mountain peaks", "mountain and city views"). Multiple agents and listings describe mountain vistas, providing strong corroborating evidence.
Multiple remarks explicitly call out Diamond Head or the Diamond Head Tower and advertise "Diamond Head views" (several units/tower-specific listings), matching historical evidence. The references are repeated across different listings and agents, indicating Diamond Head-view units are offered.
City views are consistently mentioned across the dataset and in historical records. Dozens of listing remarks reference city, downtown, or skyline views (quotes include "city skyline", "panoramic city views", "vibrant cityscape"). The repeated, cross-listing references indicate strong, building-level availability of city views.
While ocean/harbor and city views are repeatedly mentioned, none of the public remarks use the specific keywords "coastline", "shoreline", or "coastal view." Given the absence of those explicit terms across the listings and no historical confidence for coastline, there is strong evidence to omit the coastline flag.
Numerous current listing remarks across this building explicitly reference garden-related features and views—phrases include 'lush garden deck', 'landscaped garden', 'garden courtyard', 'private park', 'koi ponds', and 'garden deck'. These garden and park-like amenity descriptions appear throughout the corpus of public remarks from multiple agents and confirm the building offers garden views and park-like grounds, consistent with prior high-confidence history.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings (multiple remarks) explicitly reference sunset or evening/west exposure — notable quotes include "you’ll love the amazing sunset" and "enjoy stunning ... sunset views from the comfort of your home." The references appear across different listings/agents and corroborate that some units offer sunset views.
No analysis available
Listings mention ocean/harbor/ Diamond Head views and sunsets but do not mention the ability to view fireworks from the units or building.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly state the building has a resident/on-site manager (examples: 'resident manager', 'on-site management', 'on site security and maintenance staff'), and MLS checkbox data lists RESMAN in 13 of 20 listings. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and remarks, so inclusion is strongly supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.