Kuhio Village 2
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kuhio Village 2
Building Overview
Kuhio Village 2 in Waikiki — 12-floor concrete building with pool, concierge, and ocean/mountain views.
About Kuhio Village 2
Kuhio Village 2 is a 12-floor residential building located in Central Waikiki. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1975, is of concrete construction, and contains 108 total units served by 2 elevators.
Based on MLS data, onsite amenities include a pool, BBQ area, resident manager, concierge, and security guard. Units offer window air conditioning and many residences report ocean, mountain, and sunset views.
Additional details from MLS: covered parking is available, pets are allowed, and short-term rentals are permitted. The building is managed by Hawaiiana Management Company, Ltd. This information is based on MLS data; buyers should verify specifics, policies, and any associated fees with the management or listing agent.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for an explicit owner-occupancy percentage like "80% owner occupied" or similar and found none. The remarks repeatedly emphasize short-term rentals and even describe the majority of units as Airbnb vacation rentals, but that is not a numeric owner-occupancy statement. Per the rules, the current value of 7.00 is retained with low confidence.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator counts such as "4 elevators" or "multiple elevators" and did not find any. The references to keyed elevator access and FOB access confirm elevator service, so the current value of 2 is retained. No remarks contradict the existing count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV inclusion is strongly confirmed across the building. The MLS data shows CABTV in 20/20 listings, and multiple remarks explicitly state phrases like "includes Cable TV" and "maintenance fees cover cable TV." This looks consistent across many agents rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Common area costs appear to be included at the building level. The MLS data shows OTCOEX in 13/20 listings, and several remarks explicitly mention "common area upkeep," "common areas," or "common area expenses." The evidence is strong enough to include this feature.
No analysis available
Electricity inclusion is strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks. The current MLS data shows ELECTR in 18/20 listings, and many remarks state "includes Electric" or "maintenance fee includes electricity." This is consistent across numerous listings and agents.
No analysis available
Hot water is very strongly confirmed for the building. The MLS data shows HOTWAT in 20/20 listings and no WTRHTR exclusions, while remarks repeatedly say "hot water" or "(hot) water" is included in the maintenance fee. This is high-confidence building-level evidence.
Moderate support: internet or 'Internet service' is explicitly listed in multiple listings (~8–12 mentions) as part of the maintenance fee ('includes ... Internet' or 'Internet included'), but it's not present in every remark. Historical MLS data shows internet included in about half the listings, so confidence is somewhat lower.
No analysis available
Sewer is consistently included at the building level. The MLS data shows SEWER in 20/20 listings, and many remarks explicitly mention "Water/Sewer" or sewer included in fees. This is one of the strongest-supported features in the dataset.
Water inclusion is strongly confirmed. The current MLS data shows WATER in 20/20 listings, and public remarks repeatedly describe fees covering "Water / Sewer" or "water." This is consistent across many listings and supports a high-confidence true value.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: Remarks highlight "convenient bike and surfboard storage" and note that on-site management offers "surfboard rack rentals and bike rack rentals," and 2/14 MLS entries include storage-related amenities, indicating dedicated storage facilities.
The remarks repeatedly reference surfboard storage or surfboard rack rentals, sometimes paired with bike storage. This is direct evidence that surfboard storage facilities are available.
No analysis available
Trash chute is strongly supported for this building. Historical MLS data shows 18/20 listings with the TRACHU amenity, and one public remark explicitly mentions 'trash chute' alongside other building amenities. The repeated MLS checkbox pattern across multiple listings suggests this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for pool water-type language such as salt water pool, saltwater pool, salt pool, or saline pool. The building context confirms there is a pool, but the public remarks do not describe it as salt water. Without explicit mention, this cannot be verified from remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit payment language such as coin laundry, quarters, card-operated machines, laundry fees, or coin-op. The public remarks do not state any of those terms, so I cannot confirm that laundry is paid from remarks alone. The listing does indicate communal laundry exists, but the payment method is not documented.
I looked for phrases like laundry on each floor, laundry on every floor, or floor-by-floor laundry access. The listings only reference a laundry room / laundromat in the building, which supports communal laundry but not every-floor laundry. Since there is no explicit every-floor statement, this remains unconfirmed.
Parking is strongly supported across the listing set, with many remarks explicitly describing a public parking garage/basement parking and paid parking options. Common phrases include 'paid public parking located right below,' 'public parking garage (prepaid) is available in the basement,' and 'basement-level paid parking garages.' This appears to be a real building-level amenity or nearby shared parking option repeatedly referenced by multiple agents, not just a one-off copy-paste.
No analysis available
Confidence 87%: Multiple listings reference a 'public parking garage in basement,' 'basement-level paid parking garages,' and an 'on-site garage,' indicating covered structure parking within the building.
I looked for phrases like deeded parking, owned stall, parking included in deed, or parking stall included. Instead, the remarks consistently describe parking as paid/public/rented, which indicates the parking is not deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for a specific monthly parking charge, rental amount, or parking fee tied to this building. The remarks only say parking is paid, prepaid, or that monthly spots may be available occasionally; no explicit monthly fee for this building was stated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like parking waitlist, waiting list, or join the waitlist for parking and found none. The remarks instead frame parking as paid/public or occasionally rentable, with no indication of a formal waitlist system.
No analysis available
The remarks repeatedly describe electronic access controls, including FOB access, keyed elevators, and a key vault system. This is strong direct evidence that the building has card/fob access security.
Security guard service is strongly supported across the building’s listings and MLS history. Multiple remarks from different agents explicitly mention "on-site security," "night security patrol," "security on site nightly," "24-hour security," and "on-site security from 4pm to 6am daily," which is consistent with a real building-level amenity rather than a copy-paste error. The evidence is broad and repeated, so this feature should be retained with very high confidence.
I found multiple direct references to patrol/security coverage, including night patrol and on-site security hours. This clearly supports that the building has security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window A/C appears to be a common feature in Kuhio Village II. The current MLS data shows 16 of 20 recent listings with ACWIUN checked, and current remarks repeatedly reference "AC" in unit descriptions. While most remarks do not specify the unit type, the historical checkbox pattern is strong enough to support this as a building feature available in some units.
This feature is very likely correct based on historical MLS consistency: 19 of 20 listings show CONCRE in construction materials. The current remarks do not explicitly say “concrete,” but they also do not provide any conflicting evidence; the repeated high-rise/tower descriptions are consistent with concrete construction. Because the MLS checkbox has been stable across many listings, this appears to be a reliable building-level attribute rather than a one-off agent entry.
There is almost no evidence for double-wall construction: just 1 of 20 listings has DOUWAL checked and none of the remarks reference double-wall or similar language. The building’s known concrete high-rise design makes double-wall construction improbable, so we treat double_wall as not applicable with high confidence.
Weak/absent evidence for hollow-tile construction: only 3 of 20 MLS checklist entries show HOLTIL and none of the listing remarks mention 'hollow tile' or related terms. This appears to be isolated checkbox usage by a few listings (likely copy/paste) rather than confirmed building-wide hollow tile construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no meaningful remark-based evidence that the building is on a concrete slab foundation. Only 3 of 20 listings checked SLAB, while the remarks repeatedly focus on location, renovations, security, and rental use without mentioning foundation type. Given the low/inconsistent checkbox rate and lack of supporting remarks, SLAB should be treated as not established for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Brick construction is only lightly indicated: 5 of 20 current MLS listings still list BRICK in construction_materials, but no remarks across numerous listings reference a brick exterior or brick-and-mortar building. This likely reflects either minor brick elements or inconsistent checkbox use, so the feature is kept with modest confidence and should be treated cautiously.
No analysis available
The remarks repeatedly and explicitly confirm that short-term rentals are allowed in this building. The building is described as resort mixed-use/zoned and legal for daily or sub-30-day rentals without an NUC.
I searched for hotel pool language such as hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, or branded pool programs and found none. The listings describe legal short-term rentals, but not participation in a hotel rental pool.
I looked for language showing mandatory participation in a rental pool, but found none. The remarks instead emphasize owner use and flexible short-term rental ability, which is inconsistent with a mandatory pool requirement.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings repeatedly identify the building as a leasehold property and give a specific expiration year of 2033. No later extension or renewal year appears in the remarks, so 2033 is the lease expiry year.
I searched the public remarks for VA-related language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted," but found no references. Based on the available remarks, there is no public evidence that this building is VA loan approved.
I searched the remarks for insurance language such as fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance. Nothing in the listings indicates the HOA provides full coverage. With no evidence, this remains false at low confidence.
MLS amenity flags indicate fire sprinklers in a majority of current listings (13 of 20). Public remarks contain no explicit mentions such as 'fire sprinkler', 'sprinkler system', or 'fire suppression', so the evidence is primarily from MLS checkbox data and therefore moderately confident (implied) rather than explicitly confirmed in agent remarks.
I looked for phrases like fire/life safety evaluation passed, FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection. None were mentioned in the public remarks. With no supporting evidence, this remains false at low confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Multiple public remarks (appearing across many listings) explicitly advertise ocean views—phrases include 'OCEAN VIEW', 'small ocean view', 'Waikiki views' and 'check out the beach...from your front lanai'. This is consistent with historical High confidence that several units in the building have ocean views, and evidence appears across multiple agent listings rather than a single one, so confidence remains high.
Multiple listings in this building explicitly mention mountain views, including phrases like 'stunning ocean and mountain views,' 'mountain, city, and Waikiki views,' 'private lanai with beautiful mountain views,' and 'Beautiful Views of The Beach, Ocean Sunsets and Mountains.' These remarks span several different units (including a penthouse and high-floor corner units), indicating that mountain views are a real and recurring feature. Despite the MLS checkbox rarely being marked for mountains, the consistent, descriptive language across agents strongly confirms that some units offer mountain views.
No analysis available
City views are well-supported for this building. At least 2 listings explicitly describe city views, and the MLS history shows CITY in 13 of 20 listings, indicating this is a recurring building/unit feature rather than a one-off agent error. The evidence is consistent across multiple remarks and aligns with the historical view data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are strongly supported across multiple listings, not just one agent remark. At least several remarks explicitly mention sunsets or western-facing evening light, including "gorgeous sunsets" and "Beautiful Views of The Beach, Ocean Sunsets and Mountains." This aligns with the prior high-confidence building-level evidence and does not look like a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for direct view language such as 'fireworks view,' 'watch fireworks from the lanai,' or 'see fireworks from the unit.' The remarks mention ocean, mountain, beach, and city views, but nothing about fireworks. There is no public-remarks evidence for this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence confirms a resident/on-site manager at the building. Multiple current remarks explicitly mention a "resident manager," "on-site manager," or "on-site Resident Manager," and this aligns with the prior MLS pattern of 16/20 listings showing RESMAN. The evidence appears consistent across many listings rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.