Kuhio Village 1

MLS property data is unanimous with 39/39 listings reporting 1975 as the construction year for Kuhio Village. No remarks suggest a different build year or a complete rebuild, so 1975 is accepted as the correct year built.

Penthouse listings are on floor 12, and 43 of 46 listings agree between the MLS floor field and unit-number floor. County and state records also report 12 floors; the single floor-24 listing is an outlier.

The county assessor's reconciled unit count and the state registration both report 112 units for this single-building record. The county dwell sum and state residential_units values of 108 are set aside because the reconciled and registration totals are the stronger applicable figures.

Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 1120. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.

The listings confirm elevator service and describe elevator replacement work, including assessments through 2027. No remark states an exact elevator count, so the number remains unknown.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Listings describe individual window A/C units rather than central air, and there is no indication that the association provides central AC. Given the age/type of building and absence of ACCEN in MLS, central AC is not included in maintenance fees.

Cable inclusion is strongly supported across the listing set. Approximately 15 listings explicitly mention phrases such as "cable TV," "cable," or "cable TV included," often alongside electric, water, and internet, and this agrees with the high current MLS rate of 16/20.

Common-area costs are consistently documented, although remarks usually use the broader wording "common area expenses" rather than specifically saying common-area electricity. At least 7 listings explicitly mention common area expenses or maintenance, and the 15/20 MLS rate plus prior high confidence strongly supports inclusion.

The building is consistently described as 'Fee Simple' with no references to co-op ownership or co-op tax obligations. Coop taxes are therefore not part of the maintenance fees.

Electricity inclusion is strongly supported across the listing set and by multiple agents. Key phrases include "maintenance fees include electricity," "fee covers electricity," and "maintenance fee includes electric," with numerous listings repeating the same detail.

Omission supported: Only 2 of 20 MLS listings check GAS and public remarks never mention gas inclusion; combined with historical indications that units use electric appliances, there is strong evidence gas is not a building-level included utility.

Hot water inclusion is repeatedly confirmed across multiple listings. Remarks use phrases such as "hot water included," "hot water, sewer and common area expenses," "both (hot & cold) water," and "all-inclusive HOA fee covers ... hot water."

Internet inclusion is confirmed by repeated explicit remarks from multiple listings, including "internet," "internet included," and "all utilities" descriptions. Approximately 12 listings mention internet directly or as part of the all-inclusive maintenance fee, so the lower MLS checkbox rate appears to reflect inconsistent reporting rather than a change.

The building is described as a Waikiki condo-hotel near the beach with no waterfront marina facilities or boat access. With zero textual or MLS evidence, marina access or fees are not part of the maintenance charges.

Sewer inclusion is strongly established by the current MLS data and listing remarks. At least 7 listings explicitly quote "sewer" as included in the maintenance fee, commonly in phrases such as "electricity, water, sewer, and common area expenses," while 19/20 MLS records confirm the feature.

Water inclusion is nearly universal across the listing data. More than 20 remarks reference "water included," "electric & water (not sub-metered)," or "hot/cold water," and the 19/20 current MLS rate provides very strong corroboration.

Multiple remarks describe an 'outdoor patio with BBQ grill' as part of Kuhio Village’s common facilities. Even though only a minority of agents checked the MLS BBQ box, the explicit narrative description is strong evidence that a shared BBQ area exists.

Across more than half of the remarks, agents describe bike-related storage such as 'surfboard storage, and bike racks,' 'surfboard and bike racks,' and a 'Bicycle area,' with some noting 'surfboard and bike rack rentals too.' A building-level writeup references e-bike rentals, reinforcing that the property is set up for bicycle use and storage. The consistency of these descriptions over multiple years and listings from different agents provides strong evidence that the building offers dedicated bike storage facilities.

Listings focus on proximity to the beach, parks, and city attractions but never mention boat slips, docks, or marina facilities. This, along with the building’s non-waterfront location, confirms there is no boat dock amenity.

Agents discuss various paid parking options but never refer to a vehicle wash area or car wash station. This consistent omission and MLS data strongly suggest that no car wash amenity exists.

Kuhio Village is described as a boutique vacation-rental building with an open-air lobby and shops but never as having a clubhouse. The lack of references across many listings and unchecked MLS amenity indicate no clubhouse is available.

The building offers on-site management, security, check-in kiosks, and luggage storage, but these are operational services rather than a dedicated concierge who assists with reservations or personalized guest services. With no explicit concierge references in extensive remarks and no MLS checkbox usage, it is very likely there is no true concierge service. Buyers should view the building as self-check-in/managed, not concierge-driven.

Remarks discuss pet-friendliness but never reference any on-site dog park or pet exercise area. The lack of such mentions and MLS confirmation makes it very likely there is no dedicated dog park amenity.

Remarks consistently describe an open-air lobby, on-site resident manager, security, and automated check-in (kiosks and key vault systems) but never mention a staffed doorman or lobby attendant. Given this, and that no current MLS listing checks a doorman amenity, the building is best characterized as having security/management staff but no formal doorman service. Buyers should not expect a traditional doorman at the entrance.

Across all provided remarks, there are no references to a gym, fitness center, or exercise room. Combined with the fact that no MLS listings check the exercise-room amenity, this is very likely not available in the building.

Although the building is in a tourist area, none of the remarks mention any chauffeur or limousine service offered by the property. The lack of both MLS and narrative evidence indicates no limo or house-car service is provided.

The building is marketed for short-term rentals with lobby, security, and storage amenities, but no business or meeting facilities are described. This consistent omission supports that there is no dedicated meeting or conference room.

Many listings (well over 10) reference lanais, including 'large outdoor private lanai', 'two large lanais', and 'open lanai', showing that numerous units offer balcony-style outdoor space. One listing explicitly notes an 'outdoor patio with BBQ grill' as a Kuhio Village amenity, confirming shared patio facilities in addition to unit lanais. This mix of unit and common outdoor areas makes patio/deck a meaningful building feature for buyers.

Agents highlight access to outdoor recreation in the surrounding neighborhood rather than dedicated jogging paths on the property. This strongly suggests there is no building-specific jogging or walking path amenity.

Listings emphasize adult-oriented vacation amenities and nearby parks but never describe a kids’ playground in the building. Given the mismatch between a couple of MLS checkboxes and detailed remarks, the building almost certainly lacks a playground.

All outdoor references are to lanais/balconies and a shared outdoor patio, with no mention of 'yard', 'private yard', or fenced ground-level outdoor areas. Given the high-rise, resort-style nature of Kuhio Village and the absence of any yard-related amenities in remarks or MLS data, private yards are not a feature buyers can expect here.

One listing mentions a nearby golf course, but nothing suggests an on-site putting green. The absence of MLS and narrative evidence indicates there is no putting green at Kuhio Village.

Agents focus on the open-air lobby, outdoor patio with BBQ, and nearby parks, but do not advertise a formal recreation deck or recreation area. The consistent omission and MLS data strongly suggest no designated recreation area amenity.

Listings repeatedly describe lobby upgrades, security, and storage but never reference any kind of recreation or game room. The absence of both MLS and narrative evidence indicates this amenity is not present.

Remarks consistently emphasize easy access to nearby restaurants and nightlife but do not describe any on-site restaurant or dining facility. The narrative focus on external dining options and minimal MLS support indicate there is no in-building restaurant amenity.

Despite extensive detail about building improvements, there is no mention of any rooftop terrace or shared rooftop space. This, plus the unchecked MLS rooftop amenity, indicates the building does not offer rooftop amenities.

Given how extensively agents describe upgrades and amenities, a sauna would almost certainly be highlighted if present. Its complete absence from both MLS and remarks indicates the building does not have a sauna.

Several listings (at least 6–8) explicitly mention building-provided storage, e.g. 'surfboard & luggage storage,' 'surfboard storage,' and 'optional paid luggage storage' for early arrivals/late departures. A separate building description notes 'a dedicated service for the storage of bags and luggage,' confirming an established storage operation. Even though most MLS checkboxes omit storage, the repeated detailed remarks across different agents strongly support that the building offers shared storage facilities.

Dedicated surfboard storage is repeatedly identified in the remarks, including surfboard racks and storage facilities. The evidence is consistent across numerous listings.

Remarks highlight proximity to parks and public tennis courts but never describe a tennis court within Kuhio Village itself. Given the lack of MLS and remarks support, the building is very unlikely to have its own tennis court.

None of the provided remarks mention a trash chute, garbage chute, or refuse chute (0 listings). The TRACHU checkbox appears in 18 of 20 current MLS listings, but the absence of any supporting description across numerous agents strongly suggests copy-paste or erroneous MLS data; the feature is omitted.

Multiple listings highlight paid basement or public garage parking, always as self-park with hourly or daily fees, and never reference valet, valet attendants, or valet parking. The consistent description of only self-pay parking across many agents and listings supports that valet service is not a building amenity.

Listings characterize Kuhio Village as a centrally located Waikiki condo with open-air lobby, shops, and public/paid parking, with no reference to perimeter walls, fences, or gated access. Given both the descriptive language and absence of any gated/walled amenity in MLS, it is highly likely there is no enclosing wall or fence providing perimeter security. Buyers should not expect a gated or walled compound-style property.

The amenities described focus on location, security, storage, and an outdoor patio with BBQ, but not any water or spa facilities. This makes it very likely that there is no whirlpool or hot tub in the building.

No listing remarks mention a pool, lap pool, or swimming pool despite extensive descriptions of building amenities and repeated emphasis on proximity to Waikiki Beach instead. Only 3 of 20 MLS records check a pool-related box with no supporting text, indicating likely agent error. Given the consistent omission of any pool across many independent listings, the building is very likely to have no pool.

There are no explicit or implicit references to a heated pool anywhere in the remarks, and no pool is described in any listing. With just 1 of 20 listings ticking a heated-pool-related box and no textual support, this appears to be erroneous MLS data. Evidence strongly supports that the building does not have a heated pool.

I searched for salt water pool, saltwater pool, saline pool, and salt pool references. None were found, and the current building context indicates there is no pool.

No listing remarks describe any unit having its own washer/dryer (no phrases like 'in‑unit laundry' or 'washer/dryer in unit'), despite detailed feature lists for many renovated units. Multiple listings instead highlight shared laundry options, strongly indicating that laundry is provided communally rather than in individual units. Given the building’s studio configuration and the absence of any explicit in‑unit laundry mentions, in‑unit laundry is considered not present for this building.

Approximately 10 current or recent listings mention shared laundry, including "community laundry," "community laundromat," "community laundry facilities," and "Laundromat." The evidence appears across multiple listing descriptions and is consistent with the current MLS data, where 6 of 20 listings include COMLAU, strongly confirming a building-level community laundry facility.

I searched for coin laundry, paid laundry, laundry fees, card-operated machines, quarters, and coin-op language. Community laundry facilities are repeatedly mentioned, but no remarks confirm that the machines are paid, so paid community laundry is not established.

I searched for explicit references such as "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and "floor-by-floor laundry." Community laundry is confirmed, but no remarks indicate floor-by-floor availability.

Parking is explicitly mentioned across numerous listings, with key phrases including “paid parking garage on-site,” “self-pay public garage underneath,” “basement parking,” “public parking is offered,” and “paid garage parking (limited stalls).” The repeated descriptions across multiple agents strongly support that the building offers parking, primarily paid/shared parking rather than assigned stalls; the MLS checkbox data appears incomplete or inconsistently entered.

All detailed descriptions characterize parking as a public or paid garage with hourly/daily options and limited stalls, not as unit-specific or deeded parking. The lone ASSIGN checkbox in MLS is likely an agent error, since remarks never reference assigned or reserved stalls across many listings. Buyers should assume parking here is unassigned, pay-per-use rather than unit-dedicated.

Repeated references to a 'public parking garage', 'basement parking', and a garage 'underneath' the building clearly imply covered parking. Since all described on-site parking occurs in this garage/lower-level structure, the building does offer covered parking options. Buyers seeking covered or garage parking will find it available here on a paid basis.

Parking is repeatedly characterized as paid or public, including “public parking garage,” “paid garage parking,” and “self-pay public parking.” No listing says a parking stall is included in the deed or owned with the unit.

Across dozens of listings that carefully describe the basement/public garage and building improvements, there is no reference to EV charging or electric vehicle stations. The MLS data likewise never flags EV charging. This strongly indicates that the building does not currently offer EV charging facilities.

The listings confirm that parking is generally paid and sometimes available hourly, daily, or overnight. Because no monthly parking fee is provided, the monthly parking_fee remains unknown.

Remarks reference 'self-pay public parking garage', 'public parking is offered at basement garage', and similar language, but never 'guest' or 'visitor' parking. This indicates there is no separate, reserved guest parking amenity—only general public/paid parking that guests may use. Buyers should not expect dedicated, free guest stalls here.

Listings provide detail on security upgrades (64‑channel system, FOB access, key vault, etc.) but never describe the garage as gated or secured-entry parking. Parking is portrayed as an open public/paid garage rather than a controlled-access residents’ garage. Accordingly, the building does not offer secured-entry parking as a distinct amenity.

Across many listings, parking is repeatedly described only in terms of being a public/paid garage with hourly/daily rates, without any reference to tandem arrangements. The consistent silence on tandem stalls makes it highly likely that tandem parking is not a feature of this building’s garage.

Multiple listings refer to self-service public/paid parking with posted rates, but none mention valet or attended parking services. The building operates more like a standard self-pay public garage, so valet parking is not a current amenity here.

The remarks describe paid or public parking, including parking that is subject to availability and limited stalls. They do not mention a parking waitlist, waiting list, or joining a list for parking.

While several remarks highlight new FOB access and a redesigned security area, none reference keyed or fob-restricted elevators, and agents otherwise describe security upgrades in detail. With 0 of 20 MLS entries checking a keyed-elevator amenity and no textual evidence, it is very likely this building does not have secure/keyed elevator access. Any FOB systems appear to control building entry and related areas, not the elevators themselves.

The listings repeatedly describe FOB access, automatic entry doors, and redesigned security access systems. This is strong direct evidence that the building has card/fob-based security access.

Security is strongly supported across the listing set: 15 of 20 current listings mark SECGUA, while many remarks explicitly cite “24-hour security,” “24/7 security,” “on-site security,” or “security” as a building amenity. Although some language appears copied across listings, the consistent references across multiple agents and the documented security area, FOB access, and monitoring system confirm the feature.

I searched for explicit terms such as "security patrol," "roving security," "patrolled building," and "patrol service." General security, monitoring, and FOB access do not establish a patrol service.

Several remarks mention a '64-channel security system', an 'enhanced security with a monitoring system', and a redesigned security area with a 'new security system', all of which strongly imply camera-based video surveillance. These details appear in multiple independent listings describing recent building upgrades, outweighing the absence of the SECSYS checkbox in the MLS. Buyers can reasonably expect video monitoring throughout common areas.

Across all available remarks, there are no mentions of central air or building-wide HVAC, and MLS checkboxes for central AC are consistently unchecked (0/20). Listings that describe cooling specifically mention window A/C units instead, indicating this older Waikiki building relies on individual units rather than central AC.

No remarks across numerous listings mention split or ductless mini-split systems, despite agents frequently calling out such upgrades when present. With only 1/20 MLS entries checking split AC and all explicit cooling references pointing to window A/C, the evidence strongly suggests the building does not currently offer split AC in its units.

At least 3 listings explicitly mention window air conditioning, using phrases such as "window A/C," "window AC," and "window A/C unit." This aligns with the strong historical MLS pattern of 15/20 listings indicating ACWIUN, so the evidence supports window AC as a building feature despite not being mentioned in every listing.

Eighteen of 20 current listings mark CONCRE as the construction material. No public remarks explicitly mention concrete construction, but the high level of agreement across MLS records provides strong building-level support rather than an isolated agent checkbox.

None of the provided public remarks mention a double wall, double-wall construction, or two-wall construction. Only 3 of 20 current listings check DOUWAL, consistent with the prior low-confidence assessment and likely unreliable or copied MLS data.

Just 2 of 20 MLS listings list hollow tile (HOLTIL) and the narrative remarks are silent on hollow tile. This sparse, inconsistent usage across agents—combined with dominant CONCRE entries—suggests hollow tile is not a building-level characteristic.

No public remarks mention masonry or stucco across the many unit listings; there are only 2/20 MLS records with MASSTU checked, which appear to be isolated outliers and likely copy/paste errors. Given the lack of corroborating language in remarks and the sparse checkbox presence, the building should not be listed as masonry/stucco.

There is zero MLS checkbox support for steel-frame, and remarks consistently describe concrete-related repairs rather than a steel structure. This strongly suggests the building is not a steel-frame building.

None of the provided listings describe a slab foundation or solid concrete foundation. SLAB appears in only 2 of 20 current MLS records, so the feature remains weakly supported and should not be treated as confirmed.

No analysis available

All current listings omit wood-frame as a construction type and instead point toward a typical Waikiki concrete condo tower. With no textual or checkbox support for wood framing, it is very likely the building is not wood-frame constructed.

The above-ground construction checkbox is almost never used for this building, and the narrative focuses on unit features and location rather than any special above-ground structural type. The single ABOGRO selection is best interpreted as a one-off checkbox choice, so this feature is not treated as present at the building level.

A small minority of agents (2/20) marked BRICK in the MLS, but there is no supporting mention of brick or brick-and-mortar construction in any remarks. Given the dominant evidence for concrete and the likely checkbox inconsistency, the building is very unlikely to be constructed of brick.

There is no MLS or narrative support for single-wall construction, and the property type (Waikiki condo tower) is inconsistent with single-wall methods. This makes it highly likely that single-wall construction is not present in this building.

Short-term rental permission is repeatedly and directly confirmed throughout the listings. The remarks cite legal vacation rentals, Airbnb/VRBO use, Resort Mixed Use zoning, and daily rentals without an NUC.

The remarks clearly establish that legal short-term rentals are allowed, satisfying the prerequisite for this feature. However, searches for "hotel rental pool," "hotel rental program," hotel management, Hilton, Trump, Ritz, or comparable pool language found no mention of participation in a hotel rental pool.

The listings present short-term rental operation as an optional ownership strategy rather than a requirement. They repeatedly describe flexibility to rent, owner-occupy, or use the unit personally, and provide no evidence that all units must participate in a hotel rental pool.

Across these remarks, well over a dozen separate listings emphasize 'Fee Simple' status, often in capital letters as a key selling point, and no listing describes any unit as leasehold. Thus Kuhio Village clearly offers Fee Simple units; based on the sampled listings, at least the vast majority (20+ of the described units) are Fee Simple with no evidence of any non-FS tenure.

Dozens of remarks consistently market units as 'Fee Simple' but never reference leasehold terms or lease rent, and MLS tenure flags for the sampled listings do not show any LH entries. This pattern strongly indicates that Kuhio Village is effectively an all–Fee Simple building with no leasehold units currently represented.

The listings consistently identify Kuhio Village as fee simple rather than leasehold. References to tenant leases, such as a tenant lease expiring in 2023, concern unit occupancy and are not land-lease expiration dates.

The remarks were searched for explicit VA-related language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted." None of these terms or equivalent statements appear, so there is no public-remark evidence that the building is VA loan approved.

The listings describe maintenance fees, utilities, special assessments, and physical improvements but provide no information about HOA insurance coverage. Full insurance cannot be confirmed from the remarks, so this is treated as false under the no-current-value rule with medium confidence.

Sixteen of 20 current MLS records indicate fire sprinklers, but 0 listings explicitly mention sprinklers or a fire suppression system in the remarks. Because the prior assessment was Medium confidence and the evidence appears to be checkbox-only, this feature should be treated as probable but not strongly verified.

The remarks discuss security systems, spalling repairs, painting, lobby renovations, and other building improvements. They do not address fire/life safety evaluation status, so this is treated as false under the no-current-value rule with medium confidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

At least 4–5 listings describe ocean visibility from the unit or lanai with phrases like 'enjoy ocean views' and 'peekaboo ocean view from the interior and the lanai.' These mentions appear in different units and at different times, suggesting this is a real, building‑level characteristic, not a one‑off or copy‑paste error.

Mountain views are supported by 6 of 20 current MLS view descriptions and multiple independent-looking remarks. Key phrases include "main area lanai faces the mountains," "mountain range view," and "mountain & city views," providing strong building-level evidence that some units offer mountain views.

A detailed unit remark notes a 'partial Diamond Head view' from the side lanai, tied to the unit’s specific orientation. While fewer listings mention Diamond Head than ocean or mountain views, this explicit reference is enough to confirm that some units in the building offer Diamond Head vistas.

City views are strongly supported by 15 of 20 current MLS view descriptions, with several remarks explicitly advertising them. Examples include "city, golf course, and mountain views," "stunning city and mountain views," and "Mountain & City Views," so the feature should remain included.

Agents consistently describe views as 'partial' or 'peekaboo' ocean rather than expansive coastline vistas. The absence of coastline‑specific language across many listings suggests that this building does not offer notable coastline views.

Dozens of remarks emphasize urban, beach, and skyline surroundings but never refer to garden or courtyard views. Given the dense city setting and lack of any 'garden view' marketing, it is very unlikely that garden views are a notable or available feature here.

One unit’s remarks clearly advertise 'city, golf course, and mountain views,' directly tying the Ala Wai Golf Course to the unit’s view rather than just the neighborhood. Other remarks reference the Ala Wai Golf Course and its close proximity, consistent with the building’s location along the edge of Waikiki. While not mentioned as frequently as city or mountain views, this explicit statement is sufficient to conclude that some units in the building do have golf course views.

Across a large number of remarks that actively promote views (ocean, city, mountain, and even golf course), none mention a marina, harbor, yacht harbor, or canal view. Current MLS view fields likewise show no marina/canal-type view codes. This strongly indicates that, while near the beach and Ala Wai area, the building does not offer true marina views from its units.

View descriptions focus on landmarks (ocean, city, mountains, Diamond Head) rather than directional sun views, and 'sunrise' is never mentioned. In the absence of any explicit sunrise or morning‑sun marketing across many listings, sunrise view is not a recognized building feature.

No listing clearly states that the building or units offer sunset views. The sole sunset phrase—“winding down ... enjoying the beautiful sunset”—refers to an off-site catamaran experience, while other remarks cite mountain, city, ocean, or Diamond Head views; 5/20 records show NONE and the 2/20 SUNSET entries lack supporting remarks.

Listings highlight proximity to Waikiki Beach, the zoo, golf course, parks, and nightlife, with no indication of any cemetery in the visual environment. Given the location and complete lack of 'cemetery view' references, cemetery views can be confidently ruled out as a building feature.

The remarks describe ocean, mountain, city, golf course, and Diamond Head views, but contain no qualifying fireworks-view statement. Proximity to Waikiki attractions does not establish a fireworks view from the building.

At least two listings clearly describe the building as 'pet-friendly', explicitly marketing this to potential buyers and guests. With no contradictory 'no pets' language anywhere in the compiled remarks or MLS restrictions, there is strong evidence that pets are allowed in Kuhio Village.

At least 18 of 20 listings have RESMAN in the MLS amenities, and many current remarks independently mention an on-site or resident manager. Key phrases include "On-site Resident manager," "onsite Resident Manager," and "building has an on-site Resident manager," providing strong, consistent confirmation rather than a single copied statement.

The phrase 'Nightly Condo-Hotel properties: Kuhio Village' directly identifies the building as a condo-hotel, satisfying the explicit language requirement for condotel. Consistent references to legal daily rentals, hotel-resort tax status, on-site management, security, check-in options, and luggage storage further support that Kuhio Village operates as a condotel-style property.

The building is repeatedly described as 'Fee Simple' with condo units and resort mixed-use zoning, and there is no reference to co-op ownership structures or share purchases. This consistent depiction across many independent listings confirms that Kuhio Village is a condominium/condotel, not a co-op.