Kuhio Village 1

MLS property data is unanimous with 39/39 listings reporting 1975 as the construction year for Kuhio Village. No remarks suggest a different build year or a complete rebuild, so 1975 is accepted as the correct year built.

Building remarks mention several penthouse units and describe one as the 'highest floor unit,' while MLS unit data shows the highest floor number as 24 with no higher floors referenced. Together this strongly supports that the building has 24 stories, with the penthouse level at floor 24.

No listing remarks mention how many condos are in Kuhio Village (no phrases like '109-unit building' or similar), and MLS unit-count data is flagged as unusable. As a result, the total number of units in the building cannot be determined from the available information.

I searched for explicit owner-occupancy information (e.g., '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied') and found no percentages or descriptive statements. Because there is no numeric or descriptive occupancy data in the remarks and no prior verified value, the owner occupancy is unknown (null).

I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator counts or phrases like '4 elevators', 'four elevators', or 'multiple elevators' but found no references. Without an explicit number in the remarks, I cannot infer a count and therefore return null.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Listings describe individual window A/C units rather than central air, and there is no indication that the association provides central AC. Given the age/type of building and absence of ACCEN in MLS, central AC is not included in maintenance fees.

Strong, consistent evidence that cable TV is included: 17 of 20 MLS listings show CABTV and the public remarks repeatedly say 'cable' or 'cable TV' is included in the maintenance fee (phrases like 'Maintenance Fee includes ... cable' appear across many agent listings, suggesting broad agreement rather than isolated copy-paste errors).

Well-supported: 16 of 20 MLS listings mark common area expenses included and the public remarks explicitly state 'common area' or 'common area expenses' are part of the HOA fee in numerous listings.

The building is consistently described as 'Fee Simple' with no references to co-op ownership or co-op tax obligations. Coop taxes are therefore not part of the maintenance fees.

Very strong evidence that electricity is covered: 18 of 20 MLS listings indicate electricity included and the remarks repeatedly state 'electric' or 'electricity' is part of the all-inclusive maintenance fee (including notes that units are not sub-metered).

Omission supported: Only 2 of 20 MLS listings check GAS and public remarks never mention gas inclusion; combined with historical indications that units use electric appliances, there is strong evidence gas is not a building-level included utility.

Strong support that hot water is included: 16 of 20 MLS listings and repeated remarks state 'hot water' or '(hot) water' is included in the maintenance fee; no evidence in remarks of in-unit water heaters that would contradict building-supplied hot water.

Moderately strong evidence that internet is included: while only 6 of 20 MLS checkboxes historically listed INTSER, the public remarks in many of the current listings repeatedly state 'internet' or 'internet included' as part of the maintenance fee, indicating building-level inclusion that agents consistently mention.

The building is described as a Waikiki condo-hotel near the beach with no waterfront marina facilities or boat access. With zero textual or MLS evidence, marina access or fees are not part of the maintenance charges.

Very strong evidence that sewer is included: 19 of 20 MLS listings show SEWER and multiple remarks explicitly list 'sewer' as part of the all-inclusive HOA fee across many agent listings.

Very strong support that water is included: 19 of 20 MLS listings indicate water is included and the remarks across many listings state 'water' (often 'both hot & cold water') is covered by the maintenance fee; agents consistently reference water being part of the all-inclusive HOA.

Multiple remarks describe an 'outdoor patio with BBQ grill' as part of Kuhio Village’s common facilities. Even though only a minority of agents checked the MLS BBQ box, the explicit narrative description is strong evidence that a shared BBQ area exists.

Across more than half of the remarks, agents describe bike-related storage such as 'surfboard storage, and bike racks,' 'surfboard and bike racks,' and a 'Bicycle area,' with some noting 'surfboard and bike rack rentals too.' A building-level writeup references e-bike rentals, reinforcing that the property is set up for bicycle use and storage. The consistency of these descriptions over multiple years and listings from different agents provides strong evidence that the building offers dedicated bike storage facilities.

Listings focus on proximity to the beach, parks, and city attractions but never mention boat slips, docks, or marina facilities. This, along with the building’s non-waterfront location, confirms there is no boat dock amenity.

Agents discuss various paid parking options but never refer to a vehicle wash area or car wash station. This consistent omission and MLS data strongly suggest that no car wash amenity exists.

Kuhio Village is described as a boutique vacation-rental building with an open-air lobby and shops but never as having a clubhouse. The lack of references across many listings and unchecked MLS amenity indicate no clubhouse is available.

The building offers on-site management, security, check-in kiosks, and luggage storage, but these are operational services rather than a dedicated concierge who assists with reservations or personalized guest services. With no explicit concierge references in extensive remarks and no MLS checkbox usage, it is very likely there is no true concierge service. Buyers should view the building as self-check-in/managed, not concierge-driven.

Remarks discuss pet-friendliness but never reference any on-site dog park or pet exercise area. The lack of such mentions and MLS confirmation makes it very likely there is no dedicated dog park amenity.

Remarks consistently describe an open-air lobby, on-site resident manager, security, and automated check-in (kiosks and key vault systems) but never mention a staffed doorman or lobby attendant. Given this, and that no current MLS listing checks a doorman amenity, the building is best characterized as having security/management staff but no formal doorman service. Buyers should not expect a traditional doorman at the entrance.

Across all provided remarks, there are no references to a gym, fitness center, or exercise room. Combined with the fact that no MLS listings check the exercise-room amenity, this is very likely not available in the building.

Although the building is in a tourist area, none of the remarks mention any chauffeur or limousine service offered by the property. The lack of both MLS and narrative evidence indicates no limo or house-car service is provided.

The building is marketed for short-term rentals with lobby, security, and storage amenities, but no business or meeting facilities are described. This consistent omission supports that there is no dedicated meeting or conference room.

Many listings (well over 10) reference lanais, including 'large outdoor private lanai', 'two large lanais', and 'open lanai', showing that numerous units offer balcony-style outdoor space. One listing explicitly notes an 'outdoor patio with BBQ grill' as a Kuhio Village amenity, confirming shared patio facilities in addition to unit lanais. This mix of unit and common outdoor areas makes patio/deck a meaningful building feature for buyers.

Agents highlight access to outdoor recreation in the surrounding neighborhood rather than dedicated jogging paths on the property. This strongly suggests there is no building-specific jogging or walking path amenity.

Listings emphasize adult-oriented vacation amenities and nearby parks but never describe a kids’ playground in the building. Given the mismatch between a couple of MLS checkboxes and detailed remarks, the building almost certainly lacks a playground.

All outdoor references are to lanais/balconies and a shared outdoor patio, with no mention of 'yard', 'private yard', or fenced ground-level outdoor areas. Given the high-rise, resort-style nature of Kuhio Village and the absence of any yard-related amenities in remarks or MLS data, private yards are not a feature buyers can expect here.

One listing mentions a nearby golf course, but nothing suggests an on-site putting green. The absence of MLS and narrative evidence indicates there is no putting green at Kuhio Village.

Agents focus on the open-air lobby, outdoor patio with BBQ, and nearby parks, but do not advertise a formal recreation deck or recreation area. The consistent omission and MLS data strongly suggest no designated recreation area amenity.

Listings repeatedly describe lobby upgrades, security, and storage but never reference any kind of recreation or game room. The absence of both MLS and narrative evidence indicates this amenity is not present.

Remarks consistently emphasize easy access to nearby restaurants and nightlife but do not describe any on-site restaurant or dining facility. The narrative focus on external dining options and minimal MLS support indicate there is no in-building restaurant amenity.

Despite extensive detail about building improvements, there is no mention of any rooftop terrace or shared rooftop space. This, plus the unchecked MLS rooftop amenity, indicates the building does not offer rooftop amenities.

Given how extensively agents describe upgrades and amenities, a sauna would almost certainly be highlighted if present. Its complete absence from both MLS and remarks indicates the building does not have a sauna.

Several listings (at least 6–8) explicitly mention building-provided storage, e.g. 'surfboard & luggage storage,' 'surfboard storage,' and 'optional paid luggage storage' for early arrivals/late departures. A separate building description notes 'a dedicated service for the storage of bags and luggage,' confirming an established storage operation. Even though most MLS checkboxes omit storage, the repeated detailed remarks across different agents strongly support that the building offers shared storage facilities.

Multiple listings explicitly advertise surfboard racks/storage and surfboard storage services, providing consistent and clear evidence that surfboard storage facilities exist in the building.

Remarks highlight proximity to parks and public tennis courts but never describe a tennis court within Kuhio Village itself. Given the lack of MLS and remarks support, the building is very unlikely to have its own tennis court.

MLS amenity checkboxes indicate a trash/garbage chute in 18 of 20 recent listings and historical records previously showed ~19/20, providing consistent building-level evidence. Public remarks across listings do not explicitly mention the chute (no direct quotes), but there is no contradictory information; the prevalence across multiple agents/entries suggests the building offers a trash chute.

Multiple listings highlight paid basement or public garage parking, always as self-park with hourly or daily fees, and never reference valet, valet attendants, or valet parking. The consistent description of only self-pay parking across many agents and listings supports that valet service is not a building amenity.

Listings characterize Kuhio Village as a centrally located Waikiki condo with open-air lobby, shops, and public/paid parking, with no reference to perimeter walls, fences, or gated access. Given both the descriptive language and absence of any gated/walled amenity in MLS, it is highly likely there is no enclosing wall or fence providing perimeter security. Buyers should not expect a gated or walled compound-style property.

The amenities described focus on location, security, storage, and an outdoor patio with BBQ, but not any water or spa facilities. This makes it very likely that there is no whirlpool or hot tub in the building.

No listing remarks mention a pool, lap pool, or swimming pool despite extensive descriptions of building amenities and repeated emphasis on proximity to Waikiki Beach instead. Only 3 of 20 MLS records check a pool-related box with no supporting text, indicating likely agent error. Given the consistent omission of any pool across many independent listings, the building is very likely to have no pool.

There are no explicit or implicit references to a heated pool anywhere in the remarks, and no pool is described in any listing. With just 1 of 20 listings ticking a heated-pool-related box and no textual support, this appears to be erroneous MLS data. Evidence strongly supports that the building does not have a heated pool.

I searched for any mention of a pool and specifically for 'salt water', 'saltwater', 'salt pool' or 'saline' in the remarks and found no references. Given the building context indicates no pool, I retained false with low confidence due to absence of contrary remarks.

No listing remarks describe any unit having its own washer/dryer (no phrases like 'in‑unit laundry' or 'washer/dryer in unit'), despite detailed feature lists for many renovated units. Multiple listings instead highlight shared laundry options, strongly indicating that laundry is provided communally rather than in individual units. Given the building’s studio configuration and the absence of any explicit in‑unit laundry mentions, in‑unit laundry is considered not present for this building.

At least five listings explicitly reference shared laundry, e.g., 'community laundry facilities,' 'Amenities include: on-site resident manager, security, and laundromat,' and 'building amenities include an on-site resident manager, security, laundromat.' These mentions, from different agents and in varying marketing copy, confirm that the building provides community laundry facilities available to residents and guests.

The public remarks repeatedly mention a laundromat/community laundry, but none specify payment method or that laundry is paid. I searched for 'coin', 'coin-op', 'quarters', 'paid laundry', 'card operated', and similar terms with no matches.

Multiple remarks reference a community laundromat or community laundry facilities in the building, but I found no language indicating laundry is available on every floor. I searched for phrases such as 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'floor-by-floor laundry' and found none.

Strong evidence across multiple listings that the building offers paid/public parking: over a dozen current public remarks explicitly mention a public or on-site paid parking garage, basement parking (with rates), 'optional paid parking', or 'paid garage parking on-site'. MLS checkbox data is inconsistent, but repeated agent remarks from many different listings consistently describe available paid/public parking, indicating the building does offer parking.

All detailed descriptions characterize parking as a public or paid garage with hourly/daily options and limited stalls, not as unit-specific or deeded parking. The lone ASSIGN checkbox in MLS is likely an agent error, since remarks never reference assigned or reserved stalls across many listings. Buyers should assume parking here is unassigned, pay-per-use rather than unit-dedicated.

Repeated references to a 'public parking garage', 'basement parking', and a garage 'underneath' the building clearly imply covered parking. Since all described on-site parking occurs in this garage/lower-level structure, the building does offer covered parking options. Buyers seeking covered or garage parking will find it available here on a paid basis.

Reviewed all remarks for terms like 'deeded parking' or 'parking included in deed' and found none. Parking is described as paid/public/optional with hourly or overnight rates, indicating stalls are not deeded to units.

Across dozens of listings that carefully describe the basement/public garage and building improvements, there is no reference to EV charging or electric vehicle stations. The MLS data likewise never flags EV charging. This strongly indicates that the building does not currently offer EV charging facilities.

Searched for monthly parking fees or monthly parking rental mentions; listings only provide hourly, prepaid, and overnight rates (e.g., '$2/30 min or $30 overnight'), so no monthly parking fee available in remarks.

Remarks reference 'self-pay public parking garage', 'public parking is offered at basement garage', and similar language, but never 'guest' or 'visitor' parking. This indicates there is no separate, reserved guest parking amenity—only general public/paid parking that guests may use. Buyers should not expect dedicated, free guest stalls here.

Listings provide detail on security upgrades (64‑channel system, FOB access, key vault, etc.) but never describe the garage as gated or secured-entry parking. Parking is portrayed as an open public/paid garage rather than a controlled-access residents’ garage. Accordingly, the building does not offer secured-entry parking as a distinct amenity.

Across many listings, parking is repeatedly described only in terms of being a public/paid garage with hourly/daily rates, without any reference to tandem arrangements. The consistent silence on tandem stalls makes it highly likely that tandem parking is not a feature of this building’s garage.

Multiple listings refer to self-service public/paid parking with posted rates, but none mention valet or attended parking services. The building operates more like a standard self-pay public garage, so valet parking is not a current amenity here.

Searched for 'parking waitlist'/'waiting list' language. Listings mention limited availability and 'subject to availability/rates' but do not describe any formal waitlist system.

While several remarks highlight new FOB access and a redesigned security area, none reference keyed or fob-restricted elevators, and agents otherwise describe security upgrades in detail. With 0 of 20 MLS entries checking a keyed-elevator amenity and no textual evidence, it is very likely this building does not have secure/keyed elevator access. Any FOB systems appear to control building entry and related areas, not the elevators themselves.

Public remarks repeatedly describe electronic access controls and FOB/keycard systems (new FOB system, upgraded FOB access, automatic entry doors), providing strong evidence the building has card/fob access security.

Strong evidence that Kuhio Village 1 provides building security: historical MLS data lists SECGUA on 15/20 listings and numerous current remarks explicitly state "24-hour security" / "24/7 security" and "on-site management & security." Multiple agents mention security upgrades ("64-channel security system", "new FOB system", "redesigned security area"), indicating consistent, building-level security rather than isolated or erroneous checkbox entries.

I searched for explicit mentions of a patrol service (e.g., 'security patrol', 'roving security', 'patrol service') and found none. While the building advertises robust security and 24/7 monitoring, there is no explicit reference to a patrol service in the public remarks.

Several remarks mention a '64-channel security system', an 'enhanced security with a monitoring system', and a redesigned security area with a 'new security system', all of which strongly imply camera-based video surveillance. These details appear in multiple independent listings describing recent building upgrades, outweighing the absence of the SECSYS checkbox in the MLS. Buyers can reasonably expect video monitoring throughout common areas.

Across all available remarks, there are no mentions of central air or building-wide HVAC, and MLS checkboxes for central AC are consistently unchecked (0/20). Listings that describe cooling specifically mention window A/C units instead, indicating this older Waikiki building relies on individual units rather than central AC.

No remarks across numerous listings mention split or ductless mini-split systems, despite agents frequently calling out such upgrades when present. With only 1/20 MLS entries checking split AC and all explicit cooling references pointing to window A/C, the evidence strongly suggests the building does not currently offer split AC in its units.

Window air conditioning remains clearly supported in this building. In addition to 16 of 20 current listings checking the window A/C inclusion, at least three separate public remarks explicitly reference window A/C units (e.g., “window A/C,” “window AC”), indicating multiple agents and units confirm this feature. Because any buyer seeking units that allow or include window A/C would find options here, this feature is included at the building level.

18 of 20 recent MLS listings flag the building construction as concrete (CONCRE). None of the public remarks explicitly describe alternative materials; agent checklist use is consistent across multiple listings, supporting a reinforced concrete building.

Double-wall construction appears infrequently and inconsistently in the MLS checkboxes, with no mention in remarks to back it up. Given the stronger evidence for a straightforward concrete high-rise, these few DOUWAL entries are likely erroneous rather than indicative of building-wide double-wall construction.

Just 2 of 20 MLS listings list hollow tile (HOLTIL) and the narrative remarks are silent on hollow tile. This sparse, inconsistent usage across agents—combined with dominant CONCRE entries—suggests hollow tile is not a building-level characteristic.

No public remarks mention masonry or stucco across the many unit listings; there are only 2/20 MLS records with MASSTU checked, which appear to be isolated outliers and likely copy/paste errors. Given the lack of corroborating language in remarks and the sparse checkbox presence, the building should not be listed as masonry/stucco.

There is zero MLS checkbox support for steel-frame, and remarks consistently describe concrete-related repairs rather than a steel structure. This strongly suggests the building is not a steel-frame building.

Slab construction has minimal and inconsistent representation in the MLS data, with no textual confirmation in the remarks. Given the pattern of agent checkbox behavior and lack of direct evidence, slab is not recorded as a confirmed construction feature here.

No analysis available

All current listings omit wood-frame as a construction type and instead point toward a typical Waikiki concrete condo tower. With no textual or checkbox support for wood framing, it is very likely the building is not wood-frame constructed.

The above-ground construction checkbox is almost never used for this building, and the narrative focuses on unit features and location rather than any special above-ground structural type. The single ABOGRO selection is best interpreted as a one-off checkbox choice, so this feature is not treated as present at the building level.

A small minority of agents (2/20) marked BRICK in the MLS, but there is no supporting mention of brick or brick-and-mortar construction in any remarks. Given the dominant evidence for concrete and the likely checkbox inconsistency, the building is very unlikely to be constructed of brick.

There is no MLS or narrative support for single-wall construction, and the property type (Waikiki condo tower) is inconsistent with single-wall methods. This makes it highly likely that single-wall construction is not present in this building.

Numerous listings explicitly state that short-term/daily vacation rentals are legally permitted in this Fee Simple, Resort Mixed-Use building (e.g., 'LEGAL SHORT-TERM RENTAL', 'allows legal daily rentals').

After confirming STR is allowed, searched remarks for hotel-managed rental pool language and found none. No evidence that the building participates in a hotel rental pool program.

Remarks explicitly describe owner flexibility and optional management, indicating participation in any rental program is optional and not mandatory for unit owners.

Across these remarks, well over a dozen separate listings emphasize 'Fee Simple' status, often in capital letters as a key selling point, and no listing describes any unit as leasehold. Thus Kuhio Village clearly offers Fee Simple units; based on the sampled listings, at least the vast majority (20+ of the described units) are Fee Simple with no evidence of any non-FS tenure.

Dozens of remarks consistently market units as 'Fee Simple' but never reference leasehold terms or lease rent, and MLS tenure flags for the sampled listings do not show any LH entries. This pattern strongly indicates that Kuhio Village is effectively an all–Fee Simple building with no leasehold units currently represented.

All listings explicitly state Fee Simple ownership (e.g., 'Fee Simple', 'FEE SIMPLE LEGAL VACATION RENTAL'), so leasehold expiry is not applicable.

Searched all remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found no references. No evidence in the listings to indicate VA loan approval.

I reviewed the remarks for statements like 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', or 'comprehensive building insurance' and found none. With no explicit mention and no current verified value, I set this to false with medium confidence (absence likely indicates not stated).

The MLS amenity field FIRSPR is checked on 16 of 20 current listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention a fire sprinkler or suppression system. Evidence is therefore mixed: the majority of agents have the FIRSPR box checked (likely copy/paste across listings), but there are no explicit remarks confirming installation or recent changes, giving only moderate confidence that the building has a sprinkler system.

I searched the remarks for explicit language indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation (e.g., 'FLSE passed', 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'fire safety certified') and found no such statements. In absence of any mention and no current confirmed value, I default to false with medium confidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

At least 4–5 listings describe ocean visibility from the unit or lanai with phrases like 'enjoy ocean views' and 'peekaboo ocean view from the interior and the lanai.' These mentions appear in different units and at different times, suggesting this is a real, building‑level characteristic, not a one‑off or copy‑paste error.

Multiple listings' public remarks explicitly mention mountain/mauka views — phrases include "main area lanai faces the mountains", "mountain range view", and "Mountain & City Views". This evidence appears across several different listings/agents and confirms the building offers units with mountain views.

A detailed unit remark notes a 'partial Diamond Head view' from the side lanai, tied to the unit’s specific orientation. While fewer listings mention Diamond Head than ocean or mountain views, this explicit reference is enough to confirm that some units in the building offer Diamond Head vistas.

Several public remarks explicitly advertise city views, often together with mountain views — examples include "city and mountain views" and "city and mountain views enhance indoor/outdoor living". The repeated, multi-listing mentions indicate the building offers units with city views.

Agents consistently describe views as 'partial' or 'peekaboo' ocean rather than expansive coastline vistas. The absence of coastline‑specific language across many listings suggests that this building does not offer notable coastline views.

Dozens of remarks emphasize urban, beach, and skyline surroundings but never refer to garden or courtyard views. Given the dense city setting and lack of any 'garden view' marketing, it is very unlikely that garden views are a notable or available feature here.

One unit’s remarks clearly advertise 'city, golf course, and mountain views,' directly tying the Ala Wai Golf Course to the unit’s view rather than just the neighborhood. Other remarks reference the Ala Wai Golf Course and its close proximity, consistent with the building’s location along the edge of Waikiki. While not mentioned as frequently as city or mountain views, this explicit statement is sufficient to conclude that some units in the building do have golf course views.

Across a large number of remarks that actively promote views (ocean, city, mountain, and even golf course), none mention a marina, harbor, yacht harbor, or canal view. Current MLS view fields likewise show no marina/canal-type view codes. This strongly indicates that, while near the beach and Ala Wai area, the building does not offer true marina views from its units.

View descriptions focus on landmarks (ocean, city, mountains, Diamond Head) rather than directional sun views, and 'sunrise' is never mentioned. In the absence of any explicit sunrise or morning‑sun marketing across many listings, sunrise view is not a recognized building feature.

None of the current listings (0/20) include SUNSET in the view field, and remarks consistently describe city, mountain, Diamond Head, and partial/peekaboo ocean views instead. Phrases like “northeast-facing (towards the mountain range view!)” and “mountain & city views” suggest primarily east/mauka exposures rather than west-facing sunset vistas. Given extensive marketing language with no mention of sunsets across numerous agents and units, the building should not be considered to offer sunset views as a defining feature.

Listings highlight proximity to Waikiki Beach, the zoo, golf course, parks, and nightlife, with no indication of any cemetery in the visual environment. Given the location and complete lack of 'cemetery view' references, cemetery views can be confidently ruled out as a building feature.

I looked for explicit language stating fireworks are visible from units or the building (e.g., 'fireworks view from lanai', 'see fireworks from unit') and found none in the public remarks.

At least two listings clearly describe the building as 'pet-friendly', explicitly marketing this to potential buyers and guests. With no contradictory 'no pets' language anywhere in the compiled remarks or MLS restrictions, there is strong evidence that pets are allowed in Kuhio Village.

The presence of an on-site/resident manager is consistently and explicitly mentioned in the public remarks across many listings (e.g., 'on-site Resident manager', 'onsite resident manager', 'on-site management & security') and aligns with MLS data showing RESMAN on 18 of 20 listings. This consistent, repeated language from multiple agents indicates strong, building-level evidence that a resident/on-site manager is present.

The phrase 'Nightly Condo-Hotel properties: Kuhio Village' directly identifies the building as a condo-hotel, satisfying the explicit language requirement for condotel. Consistent references to legal daily rentals, hotel-resort tax status, on-site management, security, check-in options, and luggage storage further support that Kuhio Village operates as a condotel-style property.

The building is repeatedly described as 'Fee Simple' with condo units and resort mixed-use zoning, and there is no reference to co-op ownership structures or share purchases. This consistent depiction across many independent listings confirms that Kuhio Village is a condominium/condotel, not a co-op.