Kuhio Village 1

MLS property data is unanimous with 39/39 listings reporting 1975 as the construction year for Kuhio Village. No remarks suggest a different build year or a complete rebuild, so 1975 is accepted as the correct year built.

Building remarks mention several penthouse units and describe one as the 'highest floor unit,' while MLS unit data shows the highest floor number as 24 with no higher floors referenced. Together this strongly supports that the building has 24 stories, with the penthouse level at floor 24.

No listing remarks mention how many condos are in Kuhio Village (no phrases like '109-unit building' or similar), and MLS unit-count data is flagged as unusable. As a result, the total number of units in the building cannot be determined from the available information.

I reviewed the public remarks for explicit owner-occupancy percentages or descriptive statements (e.g., '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied'). The listings emphasize legal short-term rental operations, strong rental history, and high occupancy as a rental product, but do not state the percentage of owner-occupied units. Without an explicit percentage in the remarks, I cannot infer or change a numeric value.

I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator counts or mentions (e.g., '4 elevators', 'four elevators', 'multiple elevators'). The remarks describe lobby, security, parking, and building improvements but do not mention number of elevators. Without an explicit number in the remarks, I will not guess a numeric value.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Listings describe individual window A/C units rather than central air, and there is no indication that the association provides central AC. Given the age/type of building and absence of ACCEN in MLS, central AC is not included in maintenance fees.

Strong evidence across listings: 17 of 20 MLS listings include CABTV and many remarks state phrases like 'maintenance fee includes ... cable' or 'cable TV included'. Multiple agents consistently list cable as included, suggesting this is a building-level inclusion rather than isolated errors.

Well-supported: 15 of 20 MLS listings indicate common area expenses are included and remarks frequently state 'common area maintenance' or 'common area expenses' are covered by the maintenance fee, consistent across multiple agent listings.

The building is consistently described as 'Fee Simple' with no references to co-op ownership or co-op tax obligations. Coop taxes are therefore not part of the maintenance fees.

Very strong evidence: 18 of 20 listings mark electricity included and numerous remarks use exact phrasing like 'maintenance fee includes electric & water (not sub-metered)' or 'electricity included', indicating building-level inclusion of electricity in HOA fees.

Omission supported: Only 2 of 20 MLS listings check GAS and public remarks never mention gas inclusion; combined with historical indications that units use electric appliances, there is strong evidence gas is not a building-level included utility.

Strong support: 16 of 20 listings mark hot water included and multiple public remarks include phrases like 'hot water included' or 'maintenance fee includes ... hot water', indicating hot water is covered by HOA fees for the building.

At least 4–5 listings clearly state that the maintenance fee includes internet, often in the recurring phrase 'maintenance fee includes electric & water (not sub metered), hot water, cable, internet, on-site management & security.' This repeated, explicit mention across multiple units indicates that building-provided internet service is included in the HOA fees.

The building is described as a Waikiki condo-hotel near the beach with no waterfront marina facilities or boat access. With zero textual or MLS evidence, marina access or fees are not part of the maintenance charges.

Very strong evidence: 19 of 20 listings include SEWER and numerous remarks state 'water, sewer' or 'water/sewer' are part of the all-inclusive HOA fee, demonstrating consistent agent reporting of sewer being covered.

Very strong support: 19 of 20 MLS listings indicate water is included and many public remarks use explicit language such as 'maintenance fee includes electric & water (not sub-metered)' or 'all-inclusive HOA fee covers water', confirming building-level inclusion.

Multiple remarks describe an 'outdoor patio with BBQ grill' as part of Kuhio Village’s common facilities. Even though only a minority of agents checked the MLS BBQ box, the explicit narrative description is strong evidence that a shared BBQ area exists.

Across more than half of the remarks, agents describe bike-related storage such as 'surfboard storage, and bike racks,' 'surfboard and bike racks,' and a 'Bicycle area,' with some noting 'surfboard and bike rack rentals too.' A building-level writeup references e-bike rentals, reinforcing that the property is set up for bicycle use and storage. The consistency of these descriptions over multiple years and listings from different agents provides strong evidence that the building offers dedicated bike storage facilities.

Listings focus on proximity to the beach, parks, and city attractions but never mention boat slips, docks, or marina facilities. This, along with the building’s non-waterfront location, confirms there is no boat dock amenity.

Agents discuss various paid parking options but never refer to a vehicle wash area or car wash station. This consistent omission and MLS data strongly suggest that no car wash amenity exists.

Kuhio Village is described as a boutique vacation-rental building with an open-air lobby and shops but never as having a clubhouse. The lack of references across many listings and unchecked MLS amenity indicate no clubhouse is available.

The building offers on-site management, security, check-in kiosks, and luggage storage, but these are operational services rather than a dedicated concierge who assists with reservations or personalized guest services. With no explicit concierge references in extensive remarks and no MLS checkbox usage, it is very likely there is no true concierge service. Buyers should view the building as self-check-in/managed, not concierge-driven.

Remarks discuss pet-friendliness but never reference any on-site dog park or pet exercise area. The lack of such mentions and MLS confirmation makes it very likely there is no dedicated dog park amenity.

Remarks consistently describe an open-air lobby, on-site resident manager, security, and automated check-in (kiosks and key vault systems) but never mention a staffed doorman or lobby attendant. Given this, and that no current MLS listing checks a doorman amenity, the building is best characterized as having security/management staff but no formal doorman service. Buyers should not expect a traditional doorman at the entrance.

Across all provided remarks, there are no references to a gym, fitness center, or exercise room. Combined with the fact that no MLS listings check the exercise-room amenity, this is very likely not available in the building.

Although the building is in a tourist area, none of the remarks mention any chauffeur or limousine service offered by the property. The lack of both MLS and narrative evidence indicates no limo or house-car service is provided.

The building is marketed for short-term rentals with lobby, security, and storage amenities, but no business or meeting facilities are described. This consistent omission supports that there is no dedicated meeting or conference room.

Many listings (well over 10) reference lanais, including 'large outdoor private lanai', 'two large lanais', and 'open lanai', showing that numerous units offer balcony-style outdoor space. One listing explicitly notes an 'outdoor patio with BBQ grill' as a Kuhio Village amenity, confirming shared patio facilities in addition to unit lanais. This mix of unit and common outdoor areas makes patio/deck a meaningful building feature for buyers.

Agents highlight access to outdoor recreation in the surrounding neighborhood rather than dedicated jogging paths on the property. This strongly suggests there is no building-specific jogging or walking path amenity.

Listings emphasize adult-oriented vacation amenities and nearby parks but never describe a kids’ playground in the building. Given the mismatch between a couple of MLS checkboxes and detailed remarks, the building almost certainly lacks a playground.

All outdoor references are to lanais/balconies and a shared outdoor patio, with no mention of 'yard', 'private yard', or fenced ground-level outdoor areas. Given the high-rise, resort-style nature of Kuhio Village and the absence of any yard-related amenities in remarks or MLS data, private yards are not a feature buyers can expect here.

One listing mentions a nearby golf course, but nothing suggests an on-site putting green. The absence of MLS and narrative evidence indicates there is no putting green at Kuhio Village.

Agents focus on the open-air lobby, outdoor patio with BBQ, and nearby parks, but do not advertise a formal recreation deck or recreation area. The consistent omission and MLS data strongly suggest no designated recreation area amenity.

Listings repeatedly describe lobby upgrades, security, and storage but never reference any kind of recreation or game room. The absence of both MLS and narrative evidence indicates this amenity is not present.

Remarks consistently emphasize easy access to nearby restaurants and nightlife but do not describe any on-site restaurant or dining facility. The narrative focus on external dining options and minimal MLS support indicate there is no in-building restaurant amenity.

Despite extensive detail about building improvements, there is no mention of any rooftop terrace or shared rooftop space. This, plus the unchecked MLS rooftop amenity, indicates the building does not offer rooftop amenities.

Given how extensively agents describe upgrades and amenities, a sauna would almost certainly be highlighted if present. Its complete absence from both MLS and remarks indicates the building does not have a sauna.

Several listings (at least 6–8) explicitly mention building-provided storage, e.g. 'surfboard & luggage storage,' 'surfboard storage,' and 'optional paid luggage storage' for early arrivals/late departures. A separate building description notes 'a dedicated service for the storage of bags and luggage,' confirming an established storage operation. Even though most MLS checkboxes omit storage, the repeated detailed remarks across different agents strongly support that the building offers shared storage facilities.

Numerous listings explicitly advertise surfboard racks/storage and pair it with bike storage/racks, providing strong and consistent evidence that surfboard storage is available in the building.

Remarks highlight proximity to parks and public tennis courts but never describe a tennis court within Kuhio Village itself. Given the lack of MLS and remarks support, the building is very unlikely to have its own tennis court.

Across both historical records and current MLS data, trash chutes are consistently indicated for this building, with 19 of 20 recent listings marking the TRACHU amenity. While none of the public remarks explicitly mention a trash or garbage chute, there is no evidence suggesting their removal or absence. Given the volume and consistency of MLS data, it is highly likely the building has a trash chute system available to residents.

Multiple listings highlight paid basement or public garage parking, always as self-park with hourly or daily fees, and never reference valet, valet attendants, or valet parking. The consistent description of only self-pay parking across many agents and listings supports that valet service is not a building amenity.

Listings characterize Kuhio Village as a centrally located Waikiki condo with open-air lobby, shops, and public/paid parking, with no reference to perimeter walls, fences, or gated access. Given both the descriptive language and absence of any gated/walled amenity in MLS, it is highly likely there is no enclosing wall or fence providing perimeter security. Buyers should not expect a gated or walled compound-style property.

The amenities described focus on location, security, storage, and an outdoor patio with BBQ, but not any water or spa facilities. This makes it very likely that there is no whirlpool or hot tub in the building.

No listing remarks mention a pool, lap pool, or swimming pool despite extensive descriptions of building amenities and repeated emphasis on proximity to Waikiki Beach instead. Only 3 of 20 MLS records check a pool-related box with no supporting text, indicating likely agent error. Given the consistent omission of any pool across many independent listings, the building is very likely to have no pool.

There are no explicit or implicit references to a heated pool anywhere in the remarks, and no pool is described in any listing. With just 1 of 20 listings ticking a heated-pool-related box and no textual support, this appears to be erroneous MLS data. Evidence strongly supports that the building does not have a heated pool.

The remarks do not reference a pool at all, and building context indicates no pool. I searched for terms like "pool", "saltwater", and "salt water pool" and found no mentions.

No listing remarks describe any unit having its own washer/dryer (no phrases like 'in‑unit laundry' or 'washer/dryer in unit'), despite detailed feature lists for many renovated units. Multiple listings instead highlight shared laundry options, strongly indicating that laundry is provided communally rather than in individual units. Given the building’s studio configuration and the absence of any explicit in‑unit laundry mentions, in‑unit laundry is considered not present for this building.

At least five listings explicitly reference shared laundry, e.g., 'community laundry facilities,' 'Amenities include: on-site resident manager, security, and laundromat,' and 'building amenities include an on-site resident manager, security, laundromat.' These mentions, from different agents and in varying marketing copy, confirm that the building provides community laundry facilities available to residents and guests.

Listings consistently reference a community laundromat but do not specify whether machines require payment. I searched for terms like "coin-op", "quarters", "card operated", "paid laundry", and found no mentions indicating payment method.

Multiple remarks reference a community laundromat or community laundry in the building, but there is no language indicating laundry facilities on every floor. I searched the remarks for phrases like "laundry on each floor", "laundry room on every floor", and "floor-by-floor laundry" and found none.

Multiple current listings (well over a dozen) explicitly mention on-site or adjacent paid parking: phrases include "optional paid parking," "basement parking at $2/30 min or $30 overnight," "paid parking garage (limited stalls)," and "self-pay public garage underneath." Historical MLS evidence was high confidence that parking existed, and current remarks from several different agents consistently reference paid/garage parking rather than omitting it, indicating the building offers parking (typically paid/limited).

All detailed descriptions characterize parking as a public or paid garage with hourly/daily options and limited stalls, not as unit-specific or deeded parking. The lone ASSIGN checkbox in MLS is likely an agent error, since remarks never reference assigned or reserved stalls across many listings. Buyers should assume parking here is unassigned, pay-per-use rather than unit-dedicated.

Repeated references to a 'public parking garage', 'basement parking', and a garage 'underneath' the building clearly imply covered parking. Since all described on-site parking occurs in this garage/lower-level structure, the building does offer covered parking options. Buyers seeking covered or garage parking will find it available here on a paid basis.

Multiple listings describe paid or public garage parking, hourly/overnight or limited paid stalls, and do not state any 'deeded' or 'owned' parking stalls. Evidence supports that parking is not deeded to units.

Across dozens of listings that carefully describe the basement/public garage and building improvements, there is no reference to EV charging or electric vehicle stations. The MLS data likewise never flags EV charging. This strongly indicates that the building does not currently offer EV charging facilities.

Searched for 'monthly parking', '$/month parking', or monthly rates but found only short-term/hourly/overnight/prepaid pricing references; no monthly parking fee is specified in the remarks.

Remarks reference 'self-pay public parking garage', 'public parking is offered at basement garage', and similar language, but never 'guest' or 'visitor' parking. This indicates there is no separate, reserved guest parking amenity—only general public/paid parking that guests may use. Buyers should not expect dedicated, free guest stalls here.

Listings provide detail on security upgrades (64‑channel system, FOB access, key vault, etc.) but never describe the garage as gated or secured-entry parking. Parking is portrayed as an open public/paid garage rather than a controlled-access residents’ garage. Accordingly, the building does not offer secured-entry parking as a distinct amenity.

Across many listings, parking is repeatedly described only in terms of being a public/paid garage with hourly/daily rates, without any reference to tandem arrangements. The consistent silence on tandem stalls makes it highly likely that tandem parking is not a feature of this building’s garage.

Multiple listings refer to self-service public/paid parking with posted rates, but none mention valet or attended parking services. The building operates more like a standard self-pay public garage, so valet parking is not a current amenity here.

Looked for 'parking waitlist' or related phrases; listings mention limited availability and paid public garage but do not mention any formal waitlist system.

While several remarks highlight new FOB access and a redesigned security area, none reference keyed or fob-restricted elevators, and agents otherwise describe security upgrades in detail. With 0 of 20 MLS entries checking a keyed-elevator amenity and no textual evidence, it is very likely this building does not have secure/keyed elevator access. Any FOB systems appear to control building entry and related areas, not the elevators themselves.

Public remarks repeatedly describe upgraded electronic entry and FOB/keycard systems and a redesigned security area, clearly indicating card/fob access for building entry.

Many recent listings for Kuhio Village 1 mention security, including explicit references to “24hr security,” “24/7 security,” and “24-hr security,” as well as “on-site management & security” and “added security.” Several remarks describe a redesigned security area with a 64-channel security system, FOB access, registration kiosk, and key vault system. Combined with 16/20 MLS entries showing SECGUA, this provides strong, building-wide evidence of staffed security services.

While the building advertises 24/7 security, monitored systems, and on-site management, there is no explicit mention of a security patrol or roving patrol service in the remarks. I searched for phrases like "patrol", "roving security", and "security patrol" and found none.

Several remarks mention a '64-channel security system', an 'enhanced security with a monitoring system', and a redesigned security area with a 'new security system', all of which strongly imply camera-based video surveillance. These details appear in multiple independent listings describing recent building upgrades, outweighing the absence of the SECSYS checkbox in the MLS. Buyers can reasonably expect video monitoring throughout common areas.

Across all available remarks, there are no mentions of central air or building-wide HVAC, and MLS checkboxes for central AC are consistently unchecked (0/20). Listings that describe cooling specifically mention window A/C units instead, indicating this older Waikiki building relies on individual units rather than central AC.

No remarks across numerous listings mention split or ductless mini-split systems, despite agents frequently calling out such upgrades when present. With only 1/20 MLS entries checking split AC and all explicit cooling references pointing to window A/C, the evidence strongly suggests the building does not currently offer split AC in its units.

Window air conditioning remains clearly supported in this building. In addition to 16 of 20 current listings checking the window A/C inclusion, at least three separate public remarks explicitly reference window A/C units (e.g., “window A/C,” “window AC”), indicating multiple agents and units confirm this feature. Because any buyer seeking units that allow or include window A/C would find options here, this feature is included at the building level.

Across 19 of 20 MLS listings, agents consistently flag the construction material as concrete (CONCRE), strongly indicating a reinforced concrete building. Several independent remarks mention 'spalling and painting (2020–2021)', consistent with concrete repair and maintenance. No listings suggest any different construction type or a major structural change, so the building is treated as concrete construction.

Double-wall construction appears infrequently and inconsistently in the MLS checkboxes, with no mention in remarks to back it up. Given the stronger evidence for a straightforward concrete high-rise, these few DOUWAL entries are likely erroneous rather than indicative of building-wide double-wall construction.

Hollow tile appears only sporadically in the MLS data and is absent from all narrative descriptions. This sparse and inconsistent usage suggests those entries are likely agent checkbox errors rather than true hollow-tile building construction.

No public remarks mention masonry or stucco across the many unit listings; there are only 2/20 MLS records with MASSTU checked, which appear to be isolated outliers and likely copy/paste errors. Given the lack of corroborating language in remarks and the sparse checkbox presence, the building should not be listed as masonry/stucco.

There is zero MLS checkbox support for steel-frame, and remarks consistently describe concrete-related repairs rather than a steel structure. This strongly suggests the building is not a steel-frame building.

Slab construction has minimal and inconsistent representation in the MLS data, with no textual confirmation in the remarks. Given the pattern of agent checkbox behavior and lack of direct evidence, slab is not recorded as a confirmed construction feature here.

No analysis available

All current listings omit wood-frame as a construction type and instead point toward a typical Waikiki concrete condo tower. With no textual or checkbox support for wood framing, it is very likely the building is not wood-frame constructed.

The above-ground construction checkbox is almost never used for this building, and the narrative focuses on unit features and location rather than any special above-ground structural type. The single ABOGRO selection is best interpreted as a one-off checkbox choice, so this feature is not treated as present at the building level.

A small minority of agents (2/20) marked BRICK in the MLS, but there is no supporting mention of brick or brick-and-mortar construction in any remarks. Given the dominant evidence for concrete and the likely checkbox inconsistency, the building is very unlikely to be constructed of brick.

There is no MLS or narrative support for single-wall construction, and the property type (Waikiki condo tower) is inconsistent with single-wall methods. This makes it highly likely that single-wall construction is not present in this building.

Numerous listings explicitly state that short-term/daily vacation rentals are legally permitted in this Fee Simple, Resort Mixed-Use building. STR allowance is clearly and repeatedly confirmed.

Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', 'managed by hotel' and similar terms; listings describe STR management and registration/check-in infrastructure but do not indicate participation in a hotel rental pool.

Remarks explicitly describe optional management approaches and owner flexibility, indicating that any rental management is optional. No language indicates mandatory participation in a hotel/rental pool, supporting a high-confidence false.

Across these remarks, well over a dozen separate listings emphasize 'Fee Simple' status, often in capital letters as a key selling point, and no listing describes any unit as leasehold. Thus Kuhio Village clearly offers Fee Simple units; based on the sampled listings, at least the vast majority (20+ of the described units) are Fee Simple with no evidence of any non-FS tenure.

Dozens of remarks consistently market units as 'Fee Simple' but never reference leasehold terms or lease rent, and MLS tenure flags for the sampled listings do not show any LH entries. This pattern strongly indicates that Kuhio Village is effectively an all–Fee Simple building with no leasehold units currently represented.

Searched for phrases such as 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'ground lease ends', and four-digit years; all listings describe Fee Simple ownership and do not provide any lease expiry year.

Searched all public remarks for terms like 'VA approved', 'VA loan', or 'VA financing' and found no references. With no evidence in the listings, VA approval is not indicated.

I searched the public remarks for statements that the HOA/building provides full (walls-in) insurance (e.g., 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', 'comprehensive building insurance'). The remarks list what maintenance fees include (electric, water, hot water, cable, internet, security, etc.) but do not state that the building is fully insured by the HOA. With no explicit mention and no verified current value, I report false with medium confidence.

No public remarks explicitly mention a fire sprinkler or suppression system, but the MLS amenities have FIRSPR checked on 16/20 current listings for this building. Given the strong pattern in the structured MLS data and no evidence to the contrary, fire sprinklers are treated as present with moderate-to-high confidence, though not fully confirmed by narrative remarks.

I looked for explicit language indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation (e.g., 'FLSE passed', 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'passed fire inspection'). The remarks discuss security systems, FOB access, and lobby renovations but do not mention fire/life safety evaluation or certification. Because there is no mention and no existing verified value, I report false with medium confidence (absence of mention suggests it is not stated publicly).

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

At least 4–5 listings describe ocean visibility from the unit or lanai with phrases like 'enjoy ocean views' and 'peekaboo ocean view from the interior and the lanai.' These mentions appear in different units and at different times, suggesting this is a real, building‑level characteristic, not a one‑off or copy‑paste error.

Several listings describe clear mountain views, including phrases like 'city, golf course, and mountain views,' 'northeast-facing (towards the mountain range view!),' and 'stunning city and mountain views from two private lanais.' These mentions appear across different units, including high-floor and corner units, indicating that multiple stacks in the building enjoy mountain views. Historical data already suggested mountain views, and the current remarks strongly reinforce this.

A detailed unit remark notes a 'partial Diamond Head view' from the side lanai, tied to the unit’s specific orientation. While fewer listings mention Diamond Head than ocean or mountain views, this explicit reference is enough to confirm that some units in the building offer Diamond Head vistas.

Historical records showed strong evidence of city views and current public remarks in multiple listings continue to market city vistas—I found explicit phrases such as "city, golf course, and mountain views," "arresting Mountain & City Views," and "stunning city and mountain views" in several listings. While the MLS view checkbox presently lists no CITY entries, the consistent remarks across different agents indicate the building does offer city views; evidence is strong enough to keep view_city = true.

Agents consistently describe views as 'partial' or 'peekaboo' ocean rather than expansive coastline vistas. The absence of coastline‑specific language across many listings suggests that this building does not offer notable coastline views.

Dozens of remarks emphasize urban, beach, and skyline surroundings but never refer to garden or courtyard views. Given the dense city setting and lack of any 'garden view' marketing, it is very unlikely that garden views are a notable or available feature here.

One unit’s remarks clearly advertise 'city, golf course, and mountain views,' directly tying the Ala Wai Golf Course to the unit’s view rather than just the neighborhood. Other remarks reference the Ala Wai Golf Course and its close proximity, consistent with the building’s location along the edge of Waikiki. While not mentioned as frequently as city or mountain views, this explicit statement is sufficient to conclude that some units in the building do have golf course views.

Across a large number of remarks that actively promote views (ocean, city, mountain, and even golf course), none mention a marina, harbor, yacht harbor, or canal view. Current MLS view fields likewise show no marina/canal-type view codes. This strongly indicates that, while near the beach and Ala Wai area, the building does not offer true marina views from its units.

View descriptions focus on landmarks (ocean, city, mountains, Diamond Head) rather than directional sun views, and 'sunrise' is never mentioned. In the absence of any explicit sunrise or morning‑sun marketing across many listings, sunrise view is not a recognized building feature.

None of the current listings (0/20) include SUNSET in the view field, and remarks consistently describe city, mountain, Diamond Head, and partial/peekaboo ocean views instead. Phrases like “northeast-facing (towards the mountain range view!)” and “mountain & city views” suggest primarily east/mauka exposures rather than west-facing sunset vistas. Given extensive marketing language with no mention of sunsets across numerous agents and units, the building should not be considered to offer sunset views as a defining feature.

Listings highlight proximity to Waikiki Beach, the zoo, golf course, parks, and nightlife, with no indication of any cemetery in the visual environment. Given the location and complete lack of 'cemetery view' references, cemetery views can be confidently ruled out as a building feature.

I looked for explicit statements about viewing Friday night or other fireworks from units or lanais and found none. Proximity to attractions is mentioned, but nothing about viewing fireworks from the building.

At least two listings clearly describe the building as 'pet-friendly', explicitly marketing this to potential buyers and guests. With no contradictory 'no pets' language anywhere in the compiled remarks or MLS restrictions, there is strong evidence that pets are allowed in Kuhio Village.

Evidence is strong and consistent: historical MLS data indicates 18 of 20 listings included RESMAN, and the current public remarks repeatedly state "on-site resident manager" / "on-site Resident Manager" across many listings. The repetition across multiple listings and agents, plus the MLS amenity checkbox prevalence, supports a high-confidence true value.

The phrase 'Nightly Condo-Hotel properties: Kuhio Village' directly identifies the building as a condo-hotel, satisfying the explicit language requirement for condotel. Consistent references to legal daily rentals, hotel-resort tax status, on-site management, security, check-in options, and luggage storage further support that Kuhio Village operates as a condotel-style property.

The building is repeatedly described as 'Fee Simple' with condo units and resort mixed-use zoning, and there is no reference to co-op ownership structures or share purchases. This consistent depiction across many independent listings confirms that Kuhio Village is a condominium/condotel, not a co-op.