Kuhio Plaza

The MLS property field consistently reports 1966 as the construction year across all available listings, and no remarks suggest a different build or rebuild date. 1966 is therefore accepted as the building’s year built.

Listings for Kuhio Plaza include units as high as #110x, establishing that the building has at least 11 residential floors. No remarks mention a higher or “top” floor, so 11 floors is used as the working building total based on current MLS data.

At least five separate listing remarks repeat that there are 'only 4 units per floor,' and units are observed on up to the 11th floor. This strongly implies approximately 44 units in the building (4 units × 11 floors).

Searched for explicit statements like '45% owner occupied' or 'majority owner occupied' but found none. With no remarks to confirm or contradict, retained the current owner_occupancy value (45.00) with low confidence and note absence of evidentiary support in the listings.

Searched remarks for explicit phrases like '2 elevators', 'four elevators', or numeric counts. Found only references to secured/fob-only elevator access ('secure fob-only elevator use'), not a number. Per rules, retained current value of 2 with low confidence due to lack of explicit confirmation.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Listings describe AC units in each condo (window or split) but do not state that central AC costs are included in maintenance fees. The absence of the ACCEN checkbox in all MLS records strongly suggests central AC is not an included association utility.

None of the reviewed listings indicate that cable TV is included in the maintenance or HOA fees. With 0/9 MLS records checking the cable TV inclusion box and no textual mention, it is very likely that cable is paid separately by unit owners.

MLS data indicates 9 of 10 current listings list common area electricity (OTCOEX) as included in association fees. No public remarks explicitly mention or contradict common-area electric billing, and the consistent MLS reporting across multiple listings (despite some agent copy/paste risk) supports including this feature.

No listing indicates that co-op taxes are part of the fees, and the building is treated as a condo rather than a cooperative. This strongly supports that cooperative taxes are not included in the maintenance fees.

There is no mention of owner-unit electricity being covered by the association in either MLS checkboxes or remarks. This pattern across all listings indicates unit electrical service is likely paid separately by owners.

No MLS data or text indicates that gas is included in the association fees. With 0/9 listings checking the gas inclusion field, gas costs are very likely not part of the maintenance fee.

All units are noted as having their own water heaters, which is a strong indicator that hot water is not a centralized building utility included in HOA fees. The consistent absence of HOTWAT supports that hot water is not included in maintenance charges.

No listing suggests that building-provided internet is bundled with HOA fees. The lack of the INTSER checkbox across all MLS entries indicates internet is likely contracted and paid by owners individually.

The building is portrayed as a landlocked Waikiki condo near the beach, not a marina property. With no MLS checkboxes or text referencing a marina or boat-slip fees, marina costs are almost certainly not part of the maintenance fee.

MLS data uniformly (10 of 10 listings) reports sewer is included in the association/HOA fees. Public remarks for the building do not reference a change or exception, and the consistent, building-wide MLS entries from multiple listings support marking sewer as included.

MLS data consistently (10 of 10 listings) indicates water is included in association fees. Although public remarks do not explicitly state 'water included,' the uniform MLS reporting across all listings and lack of contradictory remarks make this a well-supported building-level feature.

The remarks focus on proximity to Waikiki Beach, parks, and restaurants, but never mention any BBQ or grill area in the building. With all 9 MLS entries leaving BBQ unchecked, the evidence indicates there is no shared BBQ facility.

Remarks consistently mention nearby Biki bike stations and bike-friendly access but never describe on-site bike storage, and 0/9 listings indicate BSTORAG in amenities. This consistent absence across multiple listings suggests the building does not provide dedicated bicycle storage facilities.

Remarks consistently focus on being '1–1.5 blocks from Waikiki Beach' and near surfing, snorkeling, and paddling spots, but never suggest private dock access or boat slips. With 0/9 MLS listings indicating a marina or boat dock, this building does not provide boat docking facilities.

Multiple listings mention 'one assigned parking spot' or 'one secured, covered parking stall' yet none describe a vehicle wash station. With 0/9 MLS amenity flags, the building appears not to offer a car wash facility.

The building is described as a mid-rise, secure, pet-friendly condo with four units per floor, but no clubhouse or community center is mentioned. Given 0/9 MLS checkboxes for this feature, a clubhouse is very unlikely.

Despite detailed descriptions of upgrades and location, none of the 9 sets of remarks refer to concierge or any kind of front desk service. The focus on self-service amenities and fob access strongly suggests there is no concierge in this building.

Multiple remarks call the building 'pet-friendly,' but none refer to an on-site dog park or pet exercise area. With 0/9 MLS entries marking a dog park, it is very likely that only pet allowance exists, not a dedicated dog park.

If there were a doorman or lobby attendant, it would almost certainly be featured in remarks and selected in MLS amenities, but neither occurs in any of the 9 listings. The security described is key/fob-based, not staffed, so the building is best characterized as having no doorman service.

None of the 9 listings for this building mention an exercise room, gym, or fitness center in the remarks. MLS amenity checkboxes are uniformly unchecked for this feature, while other building details like community laundry and fire alarm upgrades are explicitly described, suggesting no on-site exercise room exists.

Transportation references are limited to 'public transit nearby,' 'busline,' and Biki bike stations, with no mention of building-provided car or limousine service. The absence of any such description across 9 listings and MLS data indicates there is no limo or house car service.

Remarks focus on residential and lifestyle features and omit any reference to meeting or conference facilities. With no MLS listings showing a meeting room amenity, it appears the building does not offer one.

At least 4 listings mention lanais, describing 'generous size lanai' and specific lanai square footage. This shows that units in the building offer patio/deck-style outdoor space that buyers can use.

Agents point to 'Diamond head hiking' and Kapiolani Park as nearby outdoor options rather than describing a dedicated jogging path on the property. With no MLS indication of jogging/walking paths, the building likely lacks this amenity.

Family-oriented nearby attractions are mentioned (Kapiolani Park, Honolulu Zoo, Aquarium), yet there is no mention of a kids' play area or playground within the building. All 9 MLS listings omit a playground amenity, indicating none exists on-site.

Across all provided listings, outdoor space is only described as lanais, with no reference to any yard or ground-level private outdoor area. Given the mid-rise, urban condo setting, it is very unlikely that any units have a private yard.

Marketing remarks do not mention any golf-related amenities such as a putting green. The complete absence from MLS amenity checkboxes supports that the building does not have a putting green.

Agents repeatedly sell the location (beach, parks, zoo, aquarium) rather than on-site recreation spaces and never reference a recreation deck or amenity area. The consistent absence in MLS amenities supports that there is no shared recreation area on the property.

Remarks emphasize unit upgrades, parking, pet-friendliness, and community laundry but do not mention any shared rec room or game room. With 0/9 MLS listings indicating such an amenity, it is very likely absent.

The building is marketed for its access to surrounding dining and the new Target at the International Marketplace, not for having its own restaurant. Since no listings or MLS entries indicate in-building dining, an on-site restaurant is very unlikely.

Agents highlight lanais and ocean breezes but never describe a shared rooftop terrace or roof deck, which would typically be a selling point in Waikiki. Consistent omission in both remarks and MLS suggests there are no rooftop amenities.

Amenity descriptions center on security, pet-friendliness, parking, and community laundry, with no mention of any sauna or steam room. Since no MLS entries mark a sauna amenity, the building almost certainly lacks this feature.

No listing remarks reference storage lockers or extra storage, and 0/9 listings have any storage-related MLS amenities checked. Given multiple different agents and timeframes with consistent omission, this strongly suggests the building does not offer dedicated storage units as a notable amenity.

While the listings mention proximity to surfing and the surf zone ocean views, there is no explicit reference to dedicated surfboard or board storage in the building. Set to false with low confidence.

Agents describe nearby 'closeby Tennis/Pickleball play' and 'closeby Tennis/Pickleball courts' along with Kapiolani Park and other area attractions, indicating public facilities rather than building amenities. All 9 MLS listings leave tennis court unchecked, so the building itself does not appear to have courts.

All 10 current listings include the TRACHU amenity (10/10), and historical inventory flagged this building as likely having trash/garbage chutes. No public remarks explicitly mention the chute (agents often omit such details), but the unanimous MLS amenity checkbox across multiple listings from different agents provides strong evidence the building has a trash chute system.

Parking is consistently described as assigned or deeded self-parking in the garage or basement. There are no references to valet parking or valet service in any remarks, so the building almost certainly does not offer valet.

Agents repeatedly highlight the urban, walkable setting 'just a block' or '1.5 blocks' from Waikiki Beach with easy access to shops and transit, but there is no mention of the property being gated, fenced, or walled. References to 'secured, covered parking' do not imply a full perimeter wall or gated community, so wall/fence should be considered absent.

Given Waikiki marketing norms, a hot tub or spa would be prominently advertised if present, but no listing references one. The consistent lack of this amenity in MLS data strongly suggests there is no whirlpool or hot tub in the building.

None of the 9 listings reference a pool, swimming pool, or similar amenity in the remarks, and MLS amenity fields for pool are unchecked across all units. This consistent absence across multiple agents strongly suggests the building has no shared pool.

Since there is no evidence of any pool in 9 listings and no heated pool features are checked in the MLS data, a heated pool is effectively impossible. The complete lack of remarks like 'heated pool' or 'warm pool' across all units supports this conclusion.

Public remarks do not reference a pool or a saltwater pool. The building context indicates no pool; keeping pool_salt as false with low confidence due to absence of explicit mentions.

One of nine recent MLS listings for this building includes a washer/dryer in its inclusions, suggesting at least one unit has in-unit laundry. Public remarks never explicitly advertise in-unit laundry and instead emphasize shared facilities, so this is treated as a possible but not strongly documented feature. Buyers should confirm in-unit laundry availability on a unit-by-unit basis.

High-confidence evidence that the building has shared laundry facilities: 10 of 10 current MLS listings include the COMLAU amenity and several agent remarks explicitly note 'community laundry on each floor' or 'coin laundry is on each floor'. The confirmation appears consistently across multiple listings and agents, supporting inclusion of this building-level feature.

Listings repeatedly describe the laundry as 'coin laundry' on each floor, which indicates the community laundry requires payment (coin-operated) with high confidence.

Multiple listings explicitly mention community/coin laundry on each floor (e.g., 'community laundry on each floor', 'coin laundry is on each floor'), confirming floor-by-floor laundry availability with high confidence.

Every listing for this building mentions an included parking stall, with phrases like “1 parking,” “One covered parking stall,” and “One secured, covered parking stall in garage,” indicating that each unit comes with building parking. MLS data also consistently shows parking-related features on 9/9 listings and never indicates 'NONE', so it is clear the building provides on-site parking.

Strong evidence that the building offers assigned parking: multiple listings (matching historical 7/10 MLS checks) explicitly state assigned or deeded stalls, with phrases like 'designated assigned parking spot', 'one assigned LARGE parking spot', and '1 assigned parking spot in the basement'. These consistent, repeated remarks from different listings/agents support high confidence that parking is assigned.

Multiple listings (consistent with the 8/10 MLS checkbox history) explicitly describe covered or garage parking with quotes such as 'deeded covered parking stall', 'one covered parking stall', and 'One secured, covered parking stall in garage'. The repeated, specific language across agents provides strong evidence the building has covered parking.

Public remarks repeatedly describe the unit as including a deeded/assigned covered parking stall or assigned parking spot. This consistent language indicates parking is owned with the unit.

None of the listings reference EV charging stations, Tesla chargers, or any kind of vehicle charging, even when describing parking in detail. The MLS data for 9/9 listings also omits any EV charging flag, so the building is very likely not offering dedicated EV charging at this time.

Searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or similar phrases. Listings reference assigned/deeded parking but do not state any separate monthly parking charge, so parking fee cannot be determined from remarks.

While parking for the units is repeatedly described, no listing mentions “guest parking” or “visitor parking,” which agents typically highlight if present. With 0/9 MLS entries indicating guest parking and no textual references, the building likely does not provide dedicated guest parking stalls.

Agents specifically note security for the parking, including phrases like “Dedicated secure parking with remote access” and “One secured, covered parking stall in garage.” This, along with MLS flags for secured entry on some listings, shows that the parking area uses some form of controlled or gated access.

Parking is repeatedly described in terms of being assigned, large, or covered, but never as tandem or back-to-back. Given the complete absence of tandem references in both remarks and MLS data, it is very likely that tandem parking is not a feature of this building.

The listings focus on assigned and secure garage parking but never mention valet or attended services, which are typically prominently advertised if available. With no textual or MLS indication of valet parking across multiple agents’ listings, the building almost certainly does not offer valet parking.

Looked for references to a waitlist system. Because the remarks emphasize an assigned or deeded stall for each unit and include no waitlist language, there is no evidence of a parking waitlist.

At least one listing clearly describes 'secure fob-only lobby entry, secure fob-only elevator use,' indicating elevator access is controlled by a fob system. Because this is an infrastructure feature of the building, it applies to all units and should be included even though the ELEVAT amenity is unchecked in the MLS.

Multiple remarks describe secure fob-only (keycard/fob) access for the lobby and elevators, which constitutes a card/fob access security system with high confidence.

No remarks across 9 different listings reference a security guard, 24/7 security, or any on-site security personnel, despite multiple mentions of other security aspects like 'secure building' and 'secure fob-only lobby entry.' The MLS security-guard amenity is also never checked, indicating this building does not offer staffed guard service.

Remarks describe secure entry and resident manager but do not reference any on-site or roving security patrol service. Set to false with low confidence due to lack of mentions.

Remarks do not contain any references to cameras or video surveillance—only to access controls like 'secure fob-only lobby entry'—and agents otherwise highlight safety-related upgrades like the new fire alarm system. With SECSYS absent from all MLS entries, it appears the building does not have a marketed video security system.

No listing remarks mention 'central AC' or similar, and the central AC MLS checkbox is 0/9. Multiple listings instead highlight 'new window AC units' or 'Split AC in every room,' suggesting the building relies on individual AC systems rather than central air.

At least one unit’s remarks clearly state 'Split AC in every room,' and split AC appears in the inclusions for 2/9 listings. This indicates that the building offers (and allows) split AC systems in some units.

One unit is marketed with 'new window AC units,' and 6/9 listings check the window AC inclusion. The combination of explicit remarks and frequent MLS checkboxes supports that window AC is a standard cooling option in this building.

All 10 of 10 current listings in the MLS mark construction_materials = CONCRE and prior analyses also reported concrete as the building structural system. Public remarks do not explicitly state 'concrete' but there is consistent, strong agent-level checkbox evidence across multiple listings, indicating a concrete building.

Agents consistently classify the building as concrete and never as double-wall, and the mid-rise condo form makes framed double-wall construction unlikely. Thus, double-wall construction is very likely not applicable here.

Two of the nine listings mark hollow tile construction in addition to concrete, while the others simply omit it. Although remarks do not mention it explicitly, this recurring checkbox across multiple agents suggests the building likely includes some hollow tile construction components.

Previously there was high confidence that the building is not masonry/stucco and none of the public remarks describe 'masonry' or 'stucco.' Only 1 of 10 current listings now has MASSTU selected (an outlier), with no corroborating remarks, suggesting an agent error rather than a real change.

None of the 9 listings identify steel frame construction and all classify the structure as concrete. In the absence of any mention of steel framing in remarks, steel frame construction is unlikely for this building.

No agents have selected the slab construction option or referred to a concrete slab foundation in remarks. Given this complete absence and alternative construction codes being used instead, slab construction is unlikely as a defining building feature.

No analysis available

No listings indicate wood frame construction and all instead mark concrete, with remarks aligning with a concrete mid-rise building. Given the unanimous MLS data and building type, wood frame construction can be confidently ruled out.

Three of nine listings mark above-ground construction and the building is a multi-story mid-rise, which is consistent with an above-ground structural classification. While remarks do not mention it directly, the repeated MLS selection across several agents supports including above-ground construction.

No agents have checked brick construction and none of the public remarks describe brick exterior or brick construction. Combined with the consistent concrete classification, brick construction can be confidently excluded.

No listings indicate single-wall construction, and the building type (Waikiki mid-rise, all listings marking concrete) is incompatible with old-style single-wall structures. Single-wall construction can therefore be confidently ruled out.

Searched for explicit STR-permission language (e.g., 'short-term rental allowed', 'TVU', 'NUC', or minimum-stay rules). While marketing copy references vacation use, there is no explicit legal allowance for STRs in the remarks, so STR allowance cannot be confirmed.

Searched for hotel rental pool or branded hotel management language. No such program is referenced in any remark; given STR is not confirmed, hotel-pool participation is not indicated.

Looked for phrases like 'mandatory hotel pool' or 'required to participate' and found none. Because there is no evidence STR participation is allowed or a hotel pool exists, a mandatory pool is not indicated.

Across 9 listings there are 0 explicitly marked Fee Simple units and no remarks using 'fee simple' or similar language. Tenure appears to be omitted rather than clearly identified, so Fee Simple presence remains uncertain and is treated as not evidenced here.

There are 0 listings explicitly marked Leasehold and no remarks reference any ground lease or lease expiration. As with Fee Simple, tenure is simply not specified, so Leasehold is treated as not evidenced rather than clearly absent.

Looked for phrases like 'lease expires 20xx', 'ground lease', or renewal language. There is no indication the property is leasehold or any lease expiry year, so the lease expiry year is unknown from the remarks.

Searched all public remarks for explicit language indicating VA approval or VA financing acceptance. Listings describe location, renovations, and parking but contain no VA-related terms, so no evidence supports VA approval.

Searched remarks for terms indicating HOA provides full building insurance (e.g., 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', 'comprehensive building insurance'). No such language appears in the public remarks, so absent an existing current value or user verification, returned false with medium confidence.

Multiple listings note a new fire alarm system and 'fire system' to comply with Honolulu’s updated fire safety regulations, but none mention sprinklers and the FIRSPR checkbox is consistently unchecked. This pattern strongly suggests the building does not have a fire sprinkler system.

Multiple listings explicitly describe a new or upgraded fire alarm/system installed to comply with the city's new fire safety law and regulations, and note the assessment for the building fire system is paid in full. This constitutes strong evidence that the building has passed the fire/life safety evaluation.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Building-level ocean views are well supported: CURRENT MLS shows 4/10 listings with OCEAN in view_descriptions and multiple public remarks state phrases like 'ocean views and breezes', 'ocean view from both bedrooms and the lanai', and 'Diamond Head and surf zone ocean views.' Evidence is strong across multiple listings and agents, indicating the building offers ocean-view units.

MLS data shows that 3 of 9 listings checked MOUNTAIN in their view descriptions, with no listings reporting 'NONE'. Even though the narrative remarks focus more on ocean and location, the consistent MLS checkbox usage across multiple listings suggests that certain units in the building have mountain views.

Diamond Head views are supported: CURRENT MLS shows 3/10 listings with Diamond Head in view_descriptions and multiple remarks directly mention 'Diamond Head' and 'Diamond Head and surf zone ocean views' or being on the 'Diamond Head ... corner.' Multiple agents reference the view, indicating some units offer Diamond Head vistas.

Building likely offers city/town views: CURRENT MLS shows 8/10 listings with CITY in view_descriptions and remarks repeatedly reference 'town living,' 'in the heart of Waikiki,' and proximity to downtown attractions. Although remarks emphasize proximity rather than explicit 'city view' phrasing, the high prevalence across listings indicates city-view units exist in the building.

Agents specifically describe 'ocean views' but never refer to broader coastline or shoreline panoramas, and the MLS data never checks COASTLINE. This pattern suggests that while some units see the ocean, extended coastline views are not a distinct or marketed feature.

Listings talk about 'lush parks' and nearby outdoor spaces but do not describe any specific garden or courtyard views from the building itself. With 0 of 9 MLS entries checking GARDEN, it appears garden views are not a notable or marketed building feature.

Neither the MLS data nor the narrative remarks reference any golf course views, even though agents repeatedly highlight other nearby attractions. The complete lack of mention across multiple listings strongly indicates that golf course views are not a feature of this building.

Across nine listings, no MLS view field checked marina/harbor/canal, and no public remarks describe any harbor or canal outlook despite emphasizing nearby amenities and views. This consistent absence suggests the building does not meaningfully offer marina or harbor views as a selling point.

While there are references to morning activities and beach proximity, no listing explicitly advertises sunrise views or eastern exposure. The absence of SUNRISE in all MLS view fields and narrative text suggests sunrise views are not a distinct selling point for this building.

Despite heavy emphasis on Waikiki lifestyle and location, none of the agents call out sunset views in remarks or MLS view checkboxes. This consistent omission across multiple listings indicates that sunset views are not a recognized feature of the building.

Across all provided listings, there is no mention in MLS view fields or remarks of any cemetery view, positive or negative. Given the level of detail agents provide about other views and surroundings, this strong and consistent silence indicates the building does not overlook a cemetery in a way that affects unit views.

No public remarks indicate you can view fireworks from the building or unit. I searched for explicit references to viewing fireworks from the lanai/unit but found none, so set to false with low confidence.

No analysis available

At least 5 listings describe the building as pet-friendly, including one that states 'Pet Friendly 1 pet up to 45 lbs'. This is strong, repeated evidence from multiple agents that pets are allowed in the building.

All 10 current MLS listings for Kuhio Plaza include the RESMAN amenity (high historical consistency). None of the public remarks explicitly mention a resident or on-site/live-in manager, but the uniform presence of the RESMAN checkbox across multiple agents/listings supports including the feature with high confidence rather than removing it.

Remarks frame the condos as suitable for vacation or investment but do not describe any hotel-style management or programs. The absence of any condotel-specific language across many listings indicates the building does not operate as a condotel.

Listings consistently refer to these units as condos, with no mention of co-op shares or cooperative ownership structures. Combined with the lack of any COOTAX indicator, this strongly supports that the building is not a co-op.