Kuhio Courte

The building’s construction year is unknown based on the current information. A future listing explicitly stating the year built or reliable MLS property data will be required to populate this field.

There is currently no evidence in the available remarks or data to determine how many floors this building has. Future listings that explicitly describe the building height or top-floor units will be needed to establish this value.

The total number of units in the building cannot be determined from the data supplied. Look for future listings that state phrases like 'XX-unit building' or 'one of XX units' to set this value.

Looked for statements like 'X% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied', or 'high owner-occupancy' and found no references. With no quantitative or qualitative data, the owner-occupancy rate cannot be determined.

The public remarks were checked for any references to elevators (e.g., 'elevator', 'two elevators', 'lift') and none were found. With no prior data or textual evidence, the number of elevators cannot be determined.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

No listings reference central AC being covered by the building or included in fees. Without explicit statements such as 'central AC included in HOA,' this feature is treated as not included in the fees.

There is currently no textual evidence that cable TV is included in the building's fees. No listings mention phrases like 'cable included' or 'cable in HOA.' Until specific documentation appears, this feature is assumed not to be included.

Typical indicators like 'common area electric included' or 'building power included in HOA' do not appear in the available data. In the absence of such evidence, common area electricity inclusion is assumed to be false.

Phrases such as 'coop taxes included' or 'co-op tax in maintenance' are not present. Without explicit confirmation or co-op specific language, inclusion of cooperative taxes in fees is assumed not to apply.

Indicators like 'electricity included' or 'power included in HOA' are absent from the data. Therefore, building-paid electricity for units is treated as not included in the fees pending further evidence.

No phrases such as 'gas included' or 'gas in HOA fees' appear in any available text. Without such confirmation, gas inclusion in fees is assumed to be false.

Listings do not mention 'hot water included' or similar language. In the absence of explicit confirmation, hot water is assumed not to be included in the maintenance or HOA fees.

There are no statements like 'internet included' or 'Wi-Fi in HOA' in the available information. Thus, internet service is treated as not included in the fees until specific evidence indicates otherwise.

Typical language such as 'marina included' or 'boat slip in HOA' does not appear. Without explicit references, marina-related fees are assumed not to be included.

Common indicators like 'sewer included' or 'sewer in HOA fees' are absent. Therefore, sewer inclusion in maintenance fees is assumed to be false pending further documentation.

Phrases such as 'water included' or 'water in HOA' are not present in the available data. Until explicit confirmation appears, water is treated as not included in the building fees.

No listings reference BBQ areas, grills, or barbecue facilities. Without any specific mention, this amenity cannot be confirmed for the building.

None of the provided information mentions bike storage, a bike room, or bicycle racks in the building. In the absence of any supporting evidence, bike storage is not considered a confirmed feature at this time.

The information does not mention a boat dock, marina, boat slips, or waterfront dock access. Given the amenity’s rarity and lack of mention, it is treated as not present.

There are no mentions of a car wash station or vehicle wash area. With no supporting data, this feature is treated as not present.

No data mentions a clubhouse, community center, or recreation center. With no supporting evidence, this feature is treated as not present.

The current listing provides no public remarks and there are no historical references to a concierge or front desk service. As a result, concierge service is assumed not to be an amenity in this building.

The available information does not mention a dog park, dog run, or designated pet area. Given the lack of evidence, this amenity is treated as not present.

With an empty remarks field and no prior data pointing to a doorman or lobby attendant, there is no evidence this service exists at the property. The building is treated as not having a doorman amenity.

Across the provided listing data, there are no references to a gym, fitness center, or exercise room. With no positive indications, this feature is treated as not confirmed for the building.

The data contains no references to limo service, house car, or courtesy car service. Given the rarity of this amenity and no mentions, it is treated as not present.

Listings do not mention meeting or conference facilities. This absence of any mention means the amenity cannot be confirmed.

Across the provided remarks, there are 0 listings that reference a patio, deck, lanai, or similar outdoor amenity. With no historical or remark-based evidence, this feature is assumed to be absent at the building level for now.

The listings do not describe jogging paths, walking trails, or fitness paths. With no direct evidence, this feature is not confirmed.

No listings refer to a playground, kids’ play area, or tot lot. Without any such references, this feature is not confirmed.

No listings mention private yards, fenced yards, or exclusive yard access. In the absence of any historical data or marketing references, this feature is treated as not present rather than a correction of prior data.

There are no references to a putting green or golf practice area. Given its rarity and no supporting mentions, this amenity is treated as not present.

No listings describe a recreation area or amenity deck. In the absence of such references, this amenity is not confirmed.

No remarks mention a recreation room, game room, or multi-purpose entertainment room. Without direct evidence, this feature is not confirmed for the building.

No remarks mention an on-site restaurant, café, or dining facility. The absence of any reference suggests this amenity is not present.

There are no references to rooftop decks or rooftop amenities in the provided data. Without explicit mention, this feature is not confirmed.

No data describes a sauna, steam room, or similar facility. With no supporting references, this feature is treated as not present.

Across the provided listing data, there are no remarks referencing storage units, storage lockers, or extra storage space. With no historical or remark-based evidence, this feature cannot be confirmed and is treated as absent for now.

The provided public remarks are empty, so there is no evidence of any surfboard storage facilities in the building. I searched for references to surfboard, board, or surf storage but found none, so this feature is marked as not present by default.

None of the available information references tennis courts or tennis facilities. Given the rarity of this amenity and the lack of evidence, it is treated as not present.

No listings mention trash chutes, garbage chutes, or refuse chutes. In the absence of explicit evidence, this feature is not confirmed for the building.

Zero listings reference valet or valet parking, which would typically be prominently advertised if available. With no historical evidence, valet is considered absent rather than removed.

Because there is no remarks text at all and no historical evidence for a gated, fenced, or walled perimeter, there is no support for this security feature. The property is assumed not to have a notable enclosing wall or fence as a marketed amenity.

Listings do not reference any hot tub, jacuzzi, whirlpool, or spa. Without explicit evidence, this amenity is not confirmed.

Across the available data, 0 listings mention any type of pool. With no remarks, MLS detail, or historical/user-verified evidence, the existence of a building pool cannot be supported.

0 listings mention a heated pool or similar language. In the absence of any supporting remarks or prior data, there is no basis to infer a heated pool at this building.

The public remarks provided are empty and contain no references to any type of pool, including a salt water or saline pool. I searched for terms such as 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', and 'saline pool' and found no matches. Based on this lack of evidence, it is likely the building does not have a salt water pool.

Across the available data, 0 listings provide any remarks mentioning in-unit laundry (e.g., 'washer/dryer in unit', 'in-unit laundry'). With no textual evidence or historical/user-verified information, this feature cannot be confirmed for the building.

There are 0 listings with remarks mentioning shared laundry facilities (e.g., 'community laundry', 'laundry room', 'coin laundry'). In the absence of any descriptive evidence or historical data, community laundry cannot be confirmed for this building.

The listing remarks are empty, providing no information about whether any community laundry is paid or coin/card operated. I searched for references such as 'coin laundry', 'coin-op', 'card operated', 'paid laundry', or 'laundry fee' but there were none. In the absence of any evidence or prior data, this is treated as not present by default.

The public remarks field is empty, so there is no direct evidence of laundry facilities on every floor. I looked for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', or 'floor-by-floor laundry' but found nothing. With no remarks and no prior data, this is assumed not present by default.

No listings or remarks mention parking, garages, or parking stalls. With zero supporting information, this feature cannot be confirmed and is treated as absent with very low confidence.

No listings mention assigned or reserved parking. Due to complete lack of evidence, assigned parking is treated as not present with very low confidence.

No listings reference any kind of covered or garage parking. This feature cannot be validated and is assumed absent with very low confidence.

The public remarks are empty, so there is no evidence that any parking is deeded to the units. Searched for terms like 'deeded parking', 'owned parking', and 'parking stall included' but found nothing, so it is assumed the building likely does not have deeded parking.

No listings mention EV charging or similar amenities. With no supporting evidence, EV parking is treated as not present with very low confidence.

Because the remarks are empty, there is no information about whether parking, if available, requires a separate monthly fee. Searched for references to parking costs or rental but found none, so the parking fee status remains unknown.

No listings mention guest or visitor parking. In the absence of any evidence, guest parking is assumed absent with very low confidence.

No listings reference secure or gated parking entry. With zero supporting detail, secured-entry parking is treated as not present with very low confidence.

No listings specify tandem parking. This feature cannot be confirmed and is assumed absent with very low confidence.

No listings mention valet parking or attended service. With no evidence, valet parking is treated as not present with very low confidence.

With no content in the public remarks, there is no indication that the building uses a parking waitlist. Searched for any indication of a waiting list for parking but found none, so it is assumed there is no formal parking waitlist system.

The one available listing contains no public remarks mentioning elevator security, fobs, or keyed access, and there is no historical corroboration. This suggests the building does not promote or provide keyed/fob-only elevator access as an amenity.

The public remarks provided are empty and contain no references to key card, fob, or electronic access systems. I searched for terms like key card access, fob entry, card reader, and electronic/secure entry but found no evidence, so this feature is assumed not present based on available data.

The available listing has an empty public remarks field, providing no evidence of on-site security guards or 24/7 staffed security. With no historical data or explicit references by agents, a staffed security guard service is assumed not to be offered at this building.

The public remarks are empty and do not mention any security patrol or roving security services. I looked for phrases such as security patrol, roving security, patrol service, or patrolled building and found none, so this feature is assumed not present given the current information.

Because the public remarks are empty and no historical remarks or notes reference cameras or video monitoring, there is no support for a video surveillance system. This building is therefore assumed not to advertise security cameras as a feature.

The provided public remarks are empty, so there are 0 listings mentioning central air, HVAC, or similar terms. With no corroborating remarks or prior data, there is currently no evidence to support that the building offers central AC; this is treated as absent but with low confidence due to lack of information.

Because the public remarks are empty, 0 listings mention ductless or split AC systems. With no explicit or implied references and no prior verification, split AC is currently treated as not present, but this is a low-confidence assessment driven by missing data rather than positive evidence of absence.

With an empty remarks field, there are 0 listings mentioning window AC, window units, or wall AC. In the absence of any supporting evidence or user verification, window AC is marked as not present, but with low confidence since this reflects uncertainty rather than a confirmed lack of such units.

No listing remarks are available to identify the building’s construction materials or methods. There is no mention of concrete construction in any source.

No listing remarks are available to identify the building’s construction materials or methods. There is no mention of double wall construction in any source.

No listing remarks are available to identify the building’s construction materials or methods. There is no mention of hollow tile construction in any source.

No listing remarks are available to identify the building’s construction materials or methods. There is no mention of masonry or stucco construction in any source.

No listing remarks are available to identify the building’s construction materials or methods. There is no mention of steel frame construction in any source.

No listing remarks are available to identify the building’s construction type or foundation. There is no mention of a concrete slab foundation in any source.

No analysis available

No listing remarks are available to identify the building’s construction materials or methods. There is no mention of wood frame construction in any source.

No listing remarks are available to identify the building’s construction type or foundation. There is no mention of above ground construction in any source.

No listing remarks are available to identify the building’s construction materials or methods. There is no mention of brick construction in any source.

No listing remarks are available to identify the building’s construction materials or methods. There is no mention of single wall construction in any source.

The provided public remarks are empty, so there is no explicit indication that short-term rentals are allowed. I looked for terms like 'short-term rental', 'STR permitted', 'vacation rental', '30-day minimum', or NUC/TVU references and found none. In the absence of any evidence, this is treated as if STRs are not allowed.

There is no text indicating participation in a hotel rental pool, such as 'hotel rental program', 'managed by hotel', or brand-name pool references. Since short-term rentals are not evidenced as allowed, a hotel pool program is also assumed not to be present.

I searched for language like 'mandatory hotel pool', 'must be in rental program', or 'required to participate' and found none. With no evidence of STR permission or a hotel pool at all, mandatory participation is assumed not to apply.

It is not possible to determine if any units in this building are fee simple from the current data. Future listings should be checked for explicit 'fee simple' or 'FS' wording to confirm this feature.

Whether the building has any leasehold units cannot be inferred from the current information. Future listings indicating 'leasehold' or giving lease expiry details will be needed to set this feature and any FS/LH ratio.

The remarks provide no information about leasehold terms or any lease expiration year. Since no lease expiry date or renewal information is mentioned, the lease expiration year cannot be determined and is left as unknown.

The public remarks are empty, with no reference to VA approval, VA financing, or VA loans. Due to the complete lack of information, this is treated as not VA approved by default, but with only moderate confidence. New remarks explicitly stating VA approval would be needed to change this.

The remarks were checked for phrases such as 'fully insured', 'full insurance', 'comprehensive building insurance', or 'walls-in coverage' and none appeared. Without explicit confirmation, full HOA insurance coverage is treated as not established.

The presence of a building fire sprinkler system is unknown given the current data. Confirmation will require listings that explicitly note sprinklers or fire suppression as a building feature.

Searched the remarks for terms like 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE', 'fire safety certified', or 'life safety compliant' and found no matches. In the absence of any explicit statement, this is assumed not to be confirmed as passed.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

The single available listing has empty public remarks and does not mention any ocean, water, or makai views. With no corroborating historical data or descriptive references, we infer the building should not be marketed as offering ocean views.

The only listing available contains no descriptive remarks referencing mountain or mauka views. In the absence of any supporting evidence across remarks or prior data, we treat mountain views as not present for marketing purposes.

The single listing has no remarks and does not mention Diamond Head, DH views, or crater views. Without any explicit or implied references, we assume Diamond Head views are not a feature of this building.

The available listing provides no text at all, and there is no evidence of city or downtown views in any provided data. Given the complete lack of references, we do not treat city views as a building feature.

The provided listing has empty remarks and includes no mention of coastline or shoreline outlooks. In the absence of any corroborating descriptions, coastline views are not considered a feature of this building.

The single listing provides no remarks describing garden, landscaped, or courtyard outlooks. With no evidence across listings or prior records, we do not treat garden views as a building attribute.

The only listing has no descriptive remarks that would suggest golf course exposure. In the absence of any references across available information, we assume golf course views are not offered by this building.

The single listing has empty remarks and does not reference any marina or harbor-related views. With no textual or historical support, we infer marina views are not a characteristic feature of this building.

The available listing has no text mentioning sunrise, morning light, or east-facing exposure. Given the lack of any supporting description, we infer that sunrise views are not a marketed feature of this building.

The single listing offers no remarks and does not mention sunsets, evening sun, or fireworks views. With zero supporting references, we treat sunset views as not present for building-level marketing.

The only available listing has no public remarks and does not mention a cemetery or similar nearby feature. With no indication across the available data, we conclude cemetery views are not associated with this building.

The remarks contain no text describing views of fireworks from the units, lanais, or building. Because there is no evidence of any fireworks view, this feature is marked as not present with moderate confidence, pending any future explicit mention.

No analysis available

No listings indicate that pets, dogs, or cats are permitted or restricted in the building. Because there is no historical or remark-based evidence of a pet policy, pets_allowed is set to false as a conservative assumption, not as a correction of past data.

It is not currently possible to determine whether the building has an on-site resident manager. Future listings should be reviewed for specific references to a 'resident manager' or 'on-site manager' to establish this feature.

None of the remarks reference condotel operation, hotel programs, or a hotel front desk. Given the requirement for explicit evidence for condotel classification and the lack of any such statements, the building is treated as a non-condotel.

There are zero references to cooperative or co-op ownership, shares, or similar terminology. Because ownership type is always noted when a building is a co-op and no such evidence exists, the building is treated as a condominium/non-coop rather than correcting any prior record.