Kuapa Isle
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kuapa Isle
Building Overview
Kuapa Isle in Hawaii Kai, built in 1970; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed, per MLS data.
About Kuapa Isle
Based on MLS data, Kuapa Isle is located in the Hawaii Kai neighborhood and was built in 1970. Specific information on building size, unit count, and construction type is not provided in the available MLS records.
The MLS listing does not include an amenities list; buyers should note the MLS explicitly indicates pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data.
According to available records, parking details, maintenance fees, and other community rules are not specified in the MLS. Prospective buyers and agents should verify parking, fees, rules, and management information with the seller, HOA, or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks directly describe Kuapa Isle as having a "High owner occupancy rate." No exact percentage is provided, so the qualitative value is retained rather than converting it to a numeric estimate.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator information, including a stated number of elevators, "four elevators," and "multiple elevators." None of these references were found, so the number of elevators is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable inclusion is well supported for Kuapa Isle. Historical MLS data shows 18/20 listings with CABTV, and current remarks explicitly say the association dues include cable. This looks consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off agent entry.
Common-area expenses appear to be included in the maintenance fee. The MLS pattern is strong at 15/20 listings, and remarks repeatedly reference maintained grounds and common-area upkeep. The evidence suggests this is a standard building-level fee component rather than a copied checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water should be marked as not included for Kuapa Isle. The MLS pattern is decisive, with 0/20 HOTWAT and many listings showing WTRHTR, which argues against HOA-supplied hot water. No current remarks contradict that pattern.
Internet appears to be included in the association fee. The feature is supported by 14/20 MLS listings and reinforced by explicit remarks listing internet among the included dues. This is consistent enough to treat as a building feature buyers can rely on.
Marina-related access/fees are clearly part of Kuapa Isle’s offering. Historical MLS data strongly supports this, and remarks repeatedly mention marina access, direct marina frontage, boat docks, and even 'marina fee' included in the dues. The evidence is consistent across many listings and agents.
Although 5 of 20 MLS records check SEWER, several listings explicitly state sewer is billed separately (quotes: "Sewer is billed separately on a bi-monthly basis", "Sewer fee $130 every two months"). The explicit remarks from multiple agents outweigh inconsistent MLS checkboxes, indicating sewer is not included in association fees.
Water is very strongly supported as included in the maintenance fees. Historical MLS data shows 19/20 listings with WATER, and current remarks explicitly mention water among the fee inclusions. The evidence is consistent across listings and agents.
No listings explicitly describe a building BBQ or grilling amenity. The only BBQ reference is to residents enjoying 'BBQs on your deck,' which reads as private usage rather than a shared facility. Evidence is weak and appears more like marketing language than confirmation of an amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Dozens of remarks across the dataset refer to a clubhouse/community space, often alongside pool, recreation area, and basketball court. This is consistent, repeated by multiple agents, and clearly indicates a shared building clubhouse.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least a few listings explicitly refer to a 'meeting/business room,' which is direct evidence of a building meeting room amenity. The mentions are less frequent than clubhouse/pool but still consistent enough to support inclusion.
Multiple listings explicitly mention patio/deck-type outdoor spaces: 'waterfront deck,' 'covered patio,' 'lanai,' 'enclosed lanai,' and 'covered lanai.' This appears across many different remarks, not just one agent, and aligns with current MLS amenities showing PATDEC/COVPAT in 6/20 listings. The evidence strongly supports that the building offers patio/deck amenities for at least some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence across multiple listings indicates units in this building offer private yard space. At least a dozen remarks explicitly mention "private yard", "oversized side yard", or similar phrases (examples: "private yard with tropical landscaping", "fenced landscaped sprinklered oversized side yard"). Mentions appear across different agent listings and are corroborated by historical MLS amenity checks (11/20 PRIYAR), so the feature is reliably present.
No analysis available
The building clearly offers a recreation area. Multiple listings reference 'recreation area' or 'rec area,' including amenity lists that pair it with clubhouse, pool, and basketball court. The repeated inclusion across listings supports a stable shared amenity rather than copy-paste noise.
Multiple listings mention this amenity directly, including phrases like 'recreation room,' 'rec room,' 'large recreation area,' and 'recreation area and clubhouse.' The evidence is consistent across different agents and is strong enough to treat as a real shared building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings mention storage-related features and the MLS historically flagged storage in many entries (previously Medium confidence). Public remarks explicitly state items like "Two Car Attached Carport With Storage," "boat and trailer storage," and "boat storage" across at least 5 separate listings, and other listings reference ample/custom closets. Evidence comes from different agents and appears repeated rather than a single copy/paste, supporting that the building offers storage/lockers or storage spaces.
The listings discuss surfing and paddleboarding activities as well as boat docks, boat parking, boat/trailer storage, and other storage. These references do not establish dedicated surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly confirmed at the building/community level. Multiple recent listings across different agents repeatedly mention a pool, with details such as "swimming pool," "saltwater pool," and "resort-style amenities including a pool," indicating this is not a one-off copy/paste error. The evidence is consistent and overwhelming across the remarks, so the amenity should remain true.
No analysis available
The community pool is directly identified as saltwater in multiple remarks. This is consistent with the existing pool context and provides strong confirmation.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported for Kuapa Isle. Across the provided remarks, several listings explicitly mention "washer and dryer," "newer washer/dryer," or a "separate washer/dryer area," and the current MLS data shows washer/dryer included in 18 of 20 listings. The repeated mentions across multiple listings and agents make this a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
The remarks refer to in-unit washers and dryers but do not identify shared laundry facilities requiring payment. No payment-related laundry language was found.
The remarks mention individual or newer washer/dryer appliances in some units but do not describe community laundry facilities. No evidence was found that laundry rooms are available on every floor.
Parking is clearly offered at the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention “parking for up to four cars,” “two covered parking stalls,” “2-car carport,” “guest parking,” and “parking for 4 cars.” The evidence is consistent across many remarks and aligns with the current MLS data, so this is high confidence.
Assigned/reserved parking appears in the current MLS data for 7 of 20 listings. While public remarks mostly describe carports, covered stalls, or parking capacity rather than saying “assigned” directly, the repeated structured parking references suggest some units have designated stalls. Confidence is moderate because the explicit assignment language is limited and may reflect MLS checkbox input rather than remarks.
Covered parking is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention '2-car carport,' 'two covered parking stalls,' and 'carport,' and the historical MLS data shows 19 of 20 current listings with covered parking features. This appears to be consistent building/community access rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
The listings confirm substantial parking, including two covered parking stalls and parking for up to four vehicles. However, the required deeded/owned parking language was not found.
No analysis available
The remarks describe carports, driveways, guest parking, boat parking, and trailer storage. They do not identify a recurring parking fee or rental charge.
Guest parking is well supported by both MLS data and public remarks. Multiple listings explicitly state 'guest parking,' 'ample guest parking,' 'lots of guest parking,' and 'tons of guest parking,' indicating this is a shared community feature. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the strong current MLS frequency.
Moderate evidence for secured/gated entry: approximately 8–10 listing remarks reference 'gated community', 'guarded entry', 'security booth at the entrance', 'staffed security booth', 'on-site security guard' or 'roving patrol'. While MLS SECENT flags are rare (2/20), repeated agent remarks about a staffed/guarded entrance suggest the community has secured entry features, though the checkbox data appears inconsistently applied.
There is not enough evidence to support tandem parking as a building feature. Only 3 of 20 current MLS listings mark tandem in the checkbox data, and none of the remarks use the words “tandem,” “back-to-back,” or similar language. This looks more like inconsistent MLS input than a confirmed feature.
No analysis available
The remarks reference resident, guest, carport, driveway, boat, and trailer parking. No waitlist system was described.
No analysis available
The building is repeatedly described as having staffed or guarded security and gated access. No public remark confirms card- or fob-based access.
Evidence is very strong and consistent across many listings, with well over a dozen remarks explicitly describing security service. Multiple agents use varied wording—"on site security guard," "security booth," "guarded entry," and "mobile security"—which supports this as a real building-level amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
Multiple listings provide direct evidence of patrol-based security, including roving and mobile security. This strongly supports that the community has a security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is clearly supported for Kuapa Isle. Multiple listings explicitly mention it in different forms: "split AC system," "split AC downstairs," "individual split AC units in each room," "split A/C’s throughout," and "4 brand new split AC systems." The evidence is consistent across many remarks and looks like genuine building/unit-level availability rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Across the provided listings, 0 mentions explicitly describe window air conditioning units. Several remarks do mention cooling, but they specifically say 'split AC,' 'new split AC systems,' or just 'AC,' which points away from window units and toward split systems instead. The current pattern looks more like checkbox/copy-paste noise than verified window AC coverage.
Across the provided remarks, there are 0 explicit mentions of concrete construction. The current MLS checkbox appears inconsistent and likely reflects copy-paste or unchecked agent entry rather than a verified building characteristic.
This feature is the best-supported construction characteristic in the data: 18 of 20 current MLS listings show DOUWAL. None of the public remarks dispute it, and the repeated building-level checkbox pattern suggests this is a stable, community-wide attribute rather than a unit-level copy/paste error.
No analysis available
MASSTU appears in 8/20 current MLS construction_materials entries, but 0/31 public remarks reference 'masonry' or 'stucco'. No agent remarks confirm or describe masonry/stucco construction, suggesting the MLS checkbox may be inconsistently applied; included based on MLS entries but with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
Nine of 20 current MLS records carry a SLAB foundation flag, but the public remarks never explicitly describe a concrete slab or solid concrete foundation. This looks like weaker MLS-level evidence without remark confirmation, so it should be treated as moderate-confidence building information.
No analysis available
No remarks explicitly describe the building as wood frame or wood frame construction. The MLS checkbox appears in only part of the data and is not corroborated by agent remarks, so it is not reliable enough to include.
The remarks are silent on above-ground construction, and only a small minority of current MLS records check the box. This looks unverified and likely should not be treated as a building-level feature.
Brick is only checked in 1 of 20 current MLS records and is not mentioned in the remarks. With no corroboration from listing text, this is weak evidence and may be an isolated or copied MLS entry.
No analysis available
The public remarks do not support short-term rental permission. No explicit STR authorization or qualifying NUC/TVU language was found.
None of the listings mentions participation in a hotel rental pool or hotel-operated rental program. Because short-term rental permission is not supported, the prerequisite for hotel-pool participation is not met.
The remarks contain no language requiring units to participate in a hotel rental program. Since STR permission is not supported and no mandatory pool language appears, mandatory hotel-pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not identify the building as leasehold or provide a lease expiration date. No specific four-digit lease-expiry year could be extracted.
The remarks were searched for VA approval and VA financing language, but none was found. A remark stating the property 'may not conform to conventional lending' does not establish VA eligibility.
I searched the remarks for fully insured coverage, full or comprehensive building insurance, and walls-in coverage. No qualifying insurance statement was found, so full HOA insurance is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for a passed fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE approval, fire-safety certification, life-safety compliance, and passed fire inspection. No qualifying statement was found, so this feature is not supported by the remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean/water views are repeatedly confirmed across the listings, with many agents describing the building as "marina-front," "waterfront," and having "ocean access" or "water views." Several remarks also mention direct marina frontage and sunset views, indicating this is a real building-level offering rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Mountain views are well supported across the listing set, with many remarks explicitly mentioning Koko Head, mountain views, or an unobstructed view of Koko Head. This appears to be consistent across multiple listings and multiple agents, not a one-off copy/paste anomaly.
No current listing remarks explicitly describe Diamond Head views; the remarks instead focus on Koko Head, Koko Crater, marina, and water views. With only 1/20 MLS view_descriptions showing DIAHEA and no corroborating agent remarks, evidence for Diamond Head views is weak and may reflect checkbox noise or mislabeling.
There is no meaningful evidence of city views in the current listing remarks. Across the set, agents consistently describe marina, water, Koko Head, mountain, and sunset views instead, which suggests the city-view checkbox is likely inaccurate or at least not a building feature buyers should rely on.
No analysis available
Garden views are mentioned in a smaller subset of listings, but the evidence is explicit. One listing directly says "garden-view 4-bedroom" and another describes a "tranquil rock garden," suggesting some units or orientations offer garden-facing outlooks. Confidence is solid but lower than marina or sunset because the feature appears in only a few listings.
No analysis available
Marina views are extremely well supported throughout the remarks, with repeated references to direct marina frontage, marina-front living, and water views over the marina. The evidence is consistent across most listings and clearly indicates this is a core building feature.
Moderate evidence that some units offer sunrise/morning views: 2/20 MLS entries include SUNRIS and at least two public remarks mention 'sunrise' or morning light (e.g., 'Views Of ... Sunrise', 'morning coffee'), suggesting some units have eastern exposure though the feature is not universally listed across MLS entries.
Sunset views are well supported across many listings and multiple agents. Several remarks explicitly say 'sunset views,' 'sunset over the water,' or reference 'sunset' and 'Hawaiian sunset,' and one listing even notes 'Friday night fireworks' style sunset-facing waterfront living by the marina. Current MLS data also shows 6/20 listings with SUNSET, so this feature remains strongly confirmed.
No analysis available
The listings describe marina, sunset, mountain, Koko Head, and water views. The Christmas boat parade reference does not establish a Friday night fireworks view from the building or units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence supports a resident/on-site manager at Kuapa Isle. Multiple listings explicitly mention "on site manager," "resident manager," "general manager," and "well managed community staff," suggesting this is a real building amenity rather than a one-off agent checkbox. The mentions appear across many listings and agents, reinforcing that the feature is consistently present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.