Kuapa Isle
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kuapa Isle
Building Overview
Kuapa Isle in Hawaii Kai, built in 1970; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed, per MLS data.
About Kuapa Isle
Based on MLS data, Kuapa Isle is located in the Hawaii Kai neighborhood and was built in 1970. Specific information on building size, unit count, and construction type is not provided in the available MLS records.
The MLS listing does not include an amenities list; buyers should note the MLS explicitly indicates pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data.
According to available records, parking details, maintenance fees, and other community rules are not specified in the MLS. Prospective buyers and agents should verify parking, fees, rules, and management information with the seller, HOA, or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The county assessor and state registration both report 2 floors, and MLS floor fields are predominantly 1-2 with no reliable higher-floor evidence. Unit-number-derived floors were set aside because they conflict with the MLS floor field.
The county assessor reports 234 residential units and the state registration independently reports 234 units for the project. The county dwell_sum of 236 was not used because reconciled residential units are the stronger figure.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 236. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
The remarks were searched for elevator information, including references to "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators." No elevator count or elevator-related statement was found, so the number is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
At least 2 listings explicitly mention cable inclusion, including the phrases "Association Dues Includes Cable, Internet, Basic Disney/Showtime" and "Monthly maintenance fees include cable, internet, basic Disney/Showtime." This confirms the strong 18/20 MLS pattern across multiple listings rather than relying only on an isolated checkbox.
Several listings reference "well-maintained common areas," "meticulously maintained grounds," or community/front-yard maintenance. Although the remarks do not specifically quote common-area electricity, the 15/20 OTCOEX pattern and repeated descriptions of association-maintained shared areas strongly support inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No remarks state that hot water is included, and one explicitly identifies a unit water heater. The decisive MLS pattern—0/20 HOTWAT versus 16/20 WTRHTR—supports correcting or retaining this feature as false with very high confidence.
Internet appears to be included in the association fee. The feature is supported by 14/20 MLS listings and reinforced by explicit remarks listing internet among the included dues. This is consistent enough to treat as a building feature buyers can rely on.
Many listings describe "marina access," "marina privileges," or a community dock, and one explicitly states that dues include the "Marina Fee." The feature is consistently described across multiple listings and is strongly supported by the 14/20 MLS inclusion rate.
Although 5 of 20 MLS records check SEWER, several listings explicitly state sewer is billed separately (quotes: "Sewer is billed separately on a bi-monthly basis", "Sewer fee $130 every two months"). The explicit remarks from multiple agents outweigh inconsistent MLS checkboxes, indicating sewer is not included in association fees.
Water is very strongly supported as included in the maintenance fees. Historical MLS data shows 19/20 listings with WATER, and current remarks explicitly mention water among the fee inclusions. The evidence is consistent across listings and agents.
No listings explicitly describe a building BBQ or grilling amenity. The only BBQ reference is to residents enjoying 'BBQs on your deck,' which reads as private usage rather than a shared facility. Evidence is weak and appears more like marketing language than confirmation of an amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
More than 20 current remarks explicitly reference a clubhouse or club house, often alongside the pool, basketball court, marina, and recreation areas. The feature is consistently described across many different listing descriptions and is supported by 19/20 current MLS records, making the evidence overwhelming.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least a few listings explicitly refer to a 'meeting/business room,' which is direct evidence of a building meeting room amenity. The mentions are less frequent than clubhouse/pool but still consistent enough to support inclusion.
Multiple listings explicitly mention patio/deck-type outdoor spaces: 'waterfront deck,' 'covered patio,' 'lanai,' 'enclosed lanai,' and 'covered lanai.' This appears across many different remarks, not just one agent, and aligns with current MLS amenities showing PATDEC/COVPAT in 6/20 listings. The evidence strongly supports that the building offers patio/deck amenities for at least some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence across multiple listings indicates units in this building offer private yard space. At least a dozen remarks explicitly mention "private yard", "oversized side yard", or similar phrases (examples: "private yard with tropical landscaping", "fenced landscaped sprinklered oversized side yard"). Mentions appear across different agent listings and are corroborated by historical MLS amenity checks (11/20 PRIYAR), so the feature is reliably present.
No analysis available
The building clearly offers a recreation area. Multiple listings reference 'recreation area' or 'rec area,' including amenity lists that pair it with clubhouse, pool, and basketball court. The repeated inclusion across listings supports a stable shared amenity rather than copy-paste noise.
At least 15 current remarks explicitly mention a recreation room or equivalent shared space, including "recreation room/clubhouse," "rec room," "recreation area," and "large recreation area." The references appear across multiple listing descriptions and consistently describe a community amenity, strongly validating the current MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by both MLS fields and multiple public remarks from different listings. At least four remarks explicitly reference storage, including "ample storage," "boat storage," "boat and trailer storage," and "carport with storage," while 13/20 listings flag unit-level storage and 7/20 flag building-level storage.
The remarks mention surfing, paddleboarding, kayaking, boats, trailers, and boat storage. They do not identify dedicated storage for surfboards or boards, so surfboard storage is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Approximately 25+ listings explicitly mention the community pool or swimming pool, often alongside the clubhouse and recreation facilities. References from multiple agents consistently describe a shared resort-style, saltwater, or marina-front pool, strongly confirming that Kuapa Isle offers this building-level amenity.
No analysis available
Several independent listings directly state that Kuapa Isle has a saltwater pool. The repeated explicit descriptions provide strong confirmation that the community pool is saltwater.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the building: 18 of 20 current listings include washer/dryer in the MLS inclusions, and multiple remarks explicitly mention "washer and dryer," a "separate washer/dryer area," or "newer washer/dryer." The evidence is consistent with the previously high-confidence determination and is repeated across multiple listings rather than appearing to be an isolated checkbox entry.
No analysis available
The remarks refer to in-unit washers and dryers but do not identify payment requirements for shared laundry. No references to coins, cards, quarters, laundry fees, or other paid laundry systems were found.
The remarks mention washers and dryers in some individual units but do not describe shared laundry facilities. No evidence was found of laundry rooms being available on every floor.
Parking is strongly confirmed across the building and multiple agents. At least 10 current remarks explicitly mention private or assigned parking, carports, driveways, or guest parking, including parking for up to four cars and two covered stalls. This aligns with 19/20 current MLS records indicating parking availability.
Assigned/reserved parking appears in the current MLS data for 7 of 20 listings. While public remarks mostly describe carports, covered stalls, or parking capacity rather than saying “assigned” directly, the repeated structured parking references suggest some units have designated stalls. Confidence is moderate because the explicit assignment language is limited and may reflect MLS checkbox input rather than remarks.
Covered parking is clearly available in the building, with multiple independent remarks identifying carports or covered stalls. Key phrases include 'two covered parking stalls,' '2-car carport,' 'Two Car Attached Carport With Storage,' and '2 Parking (Carport).' The strong historical evidence and repeated current confirmations support this feature.
Multiple listings describe parking arrangements, including two covered stalls, carports, and parking for up to four vehicles. None explicitly says the parking is deeded, included in the deed, or separately owned.
No analysis available
The remarks discuss carports, driveways, guest parking, boat storage, and vehicle capacity. They do not identify a recurring fee for parking.
Guest parking is well supported by both MLS data and public remarks. Multiple listings explicitly state 'guest parking,' 'ample guest parking,' 'lots of guest parking,' and 'tons of guest parking,' indicating this is a shared community feature. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the strong current MLS frequency.
Moderate evidence for secured/gated entry: approximately 8–10 listing remarks reference 'gated community', 'guarded entry', 'security booth at the entrance', 'staffed security booth', 'on-site security guard' or 'roving patrol'. While MLS SECENT flags are rare (2/20), repeated agent remarks about a staffed/guarded entrance suggest the community has secured entry features, though the checkbox data appears inconsistently applied.
There is not enough evidence to support tandem parking as a building feature. Only 3 of 20 current MLS listings mark tandem in the checkbox data, and none of the remarks use the words “tandem,” “back-to-back,” or similar language. This looks more like inconsistent MLS input than a confirmed feature.
No analysis available
The listings repeatedly mention guest parking and private or covered parking arrangements. No building-wide parking waitlist system is described.
No analysis available
The remarks repeatedly mention gated or guarded entry, security booths, and mobile or roving security. However, none describe a card- or fob-based access system, so card access is not supported.
Security service is strongly supported across many listings from multiple agents, with at least 15 of 20 listings containing explicit references to a security booth, guarded entrance, patrol, mobile security, or an on-site security guard. Key phrases include 'on site security guard,' 'guarded entry,' 'staffed security booth,' 'entry with roving patrol,' and 'guarded entrance with mobile security'; the consistency and historical high confidence indicate this is a genuine building amenity rather than isolated copy-paste.
Multiple listings directly confirm patrol-based security service at the community. References to mobile, roving, and patrol security provide strong repeated evidence that security patrol is present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is strongly supported across the building: 13/20 current listings include ACSPL, while numerous remarks from different listings explicitly describe split or individual systems. Key examples include 'split AC system,' 'split AC downstairs,' 'new split AC system installed in 2024,' and 'individual split AC units in each room,' indicating this is a legitimate building feature rather than merely copied checkbox data.
Across the provided listings, 0 mentions explicitly describe window air conditioning units. Several remarks do mention cooling, but they specifically say 'split AC,' 'new split AC systems,' or just 'AC,' which points away from window units and toward split systems instead. The current pattern looks more like checkbox/copy-paste noise than verified window AC coverage.
Across the provided remarks, there are 0 explicit mentions of concrete construction. The current MLS checkbox appears inconsistent and likely reflects copy-paste or unchecked agent entry rather than a verified building characteristic.
Double-wall construction is the strongest-supported feature: 18 of 20 current listings contain the DOUWAL construction code. No remarks mention “double wall,” “double-wall construction,” or “two walls,” so the support is broad but appears to derive from repeated MLS data rather than narrative confirmation.
No analysis available
MASSTU appears in 8/20 current MLS construction_materials entries, but 0/31 public remarks reference 'masonry' or 'stucco'. No agent remarks confirm or describe masonry/stucco construction, suggesting the MLS checkbox may be inconsistently applied; included based on MLS entries but with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
Nine of 20 current MLS records carry a SLAB foundation flag, but the public remarks never explicitly describe a concrete slab or solid concrete foundation. This looks like weaker MLS-level evidence without remark confirmation, so it should be treated as moderate-confidence building information.
No analysis available
Wood-frame construction is supported by MLS data in 12 of 20 listings, consistent with the prior high-confidence assessment. No public remarks explicitly state “wood frame” or “wood frame construction,” so the evidence is primarily checkbox-based rather than independently confirmed by listing narratives.
Only 3 of 20 current MLS listings identify ABOGRO, and none of the provided remarks mention “above ground construction” or related wording. The sparse current checkbox evidence makes this feature weakly supported and potentially copied inconsistently, but the prior high-confidence assessment prevents confidently correcting it to false.
Brick is only checked in 1 of 20 current MLS records and is not mentioned in the remarks. With no corroboration from listing text, this is weak evidence and may be an isolated or copied MLS entry.
No analysis available
The remarks consistently present Kuapa Isle as a residential townhome community and do not provide affirmative evidence that short-term rentals are permitted. No explicit STR approval or rental-use designation was found.
Listings mention pools, clubhouses, marina access, security, and resident or on-site management. No hotel rental pool, hotel operation, or hotel-managed rental program is mentioned, and STR is not established as allowed.
The remarks contain no evidence of a mandatory hotel rental program, required rental participation, or inability to opt out. Because STR and hotel-pool participation are not established, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks describe Kuapa Isle as a residential townhome community but do not identify leasehold land tenure. No specific lease expiration or extension year was found.
The remarks were searched for explicit VA financing language, including VA approved, VA financing, and VA loans accepted. No such language was found.
The remarks were searched for statements about full insurance, fully insured coverage, comprehensive building insurance, and walls-in coverage. No such statement was found; under the absence rule, this is treated as false with low-to-medium confidence.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for references to a passed fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE approval, fire-safety certification, life-safety compliance, or a passed fire inspection. None were found; under the absence rule, this is treated as false with low-to-medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean/water views are repeatedly confirmed across the listings, with many agents describing the building as "marina-front," "waterfront," and having "ocean access" or "water views." Several remarks also mention direct marina frontage and sunset views, indicating this is a real building-level offering rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Mountain views are well supported across the listing set, with many remarks explicitly mentioning Koko Head, mountain views, or an unobstructed view of Koko Head. This appears to be consistent across multiple listings and multiple agents, not a one-off copy/paste anomaly.
No current listing remarks explicitly describe Diamond Head views; the remarks instead focus on Koko Head, Koko Crater, marina, and water views. With only 1/20 MLS view_descriptions showing DIAHEA and no corroborating agent remarks, evidence for Diamond Head views is weak and may reflect checkbox noise or mislabeling.
There is no meaningful evidence of city views in the current listing remarks. Across the set, agents consistently describe marina, water, Koko Head, mountain, and sunset views instead, which suggests the city-view checkbox is likely inaccurate or at least not a building feature buyers should rely on.
No analysis available
Garden views are mentioned in a smaller subset of listings, but the evidence is explicit. One listing directly says "garden-view 4-bedroom" and another describes a "tranquil rock garden," suggesting some units or orientations offer garden-facing outlooks. Confidence is solid but lower than marina or sunset because the feature appears in only a few listings.
No analysis available
Marina views are extremely well supported throughout the remarks, with repeated references to direct marina frontage, marina-front living, and water views over the marina. The evidence is consistent across most listings and clearly indicates this is a core building feature.
Moderate evidence that some units offer sunrise/morning views: 2/20 MLS entries include SUNRIS and at least two public remarks mention 'sunrise' or morning light (e.g., 'Views Of ... Sunrise', 'morning coffee'), suggesting some units have eastern exposure though the feature is not universally listed across MLS entries.
Sunset views are strongly supported across multiple listings and appear to be a genuine building/location feature, particularly for marina-front units. Six of 20 current listings include SUNSET in the view descriptions, while several independent remarks explicitly describe sunset views or watching the sunset over the water; the three listings marked NONE likely reflect unit-specific orientation rather than disproving the building-level feature.
No analysis available
The listings describe marina, ocean, mountain, sunset, and water views. One remark mentions front-row seats for a Christmas boat parade, but no remark states that Friday night fireworks can be viewed from a unit or the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 7 current remarks explicitly mention a resident or on-site manager, including "on-site resident manager," "on-site manager," and "resident manager." The repeated confirmations across different listings, combined with 13/20 MLS listings carrying RESMAN and strong historical confidence, establish that Kuapa Isle has a resident manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.