Kon Tiki Hotel Annex

Property data shows a consistent build year of 1960 across 12/12 listings. No remarks indicate a different construction year or full rebuild, so 1960 is taken as the building’s construction year.

At least 3 separate listings state the building is a 'three-story walk-up' or 'three-story walkup (no elevators)'. The highest unit floor observed in MLS data is 3, with no evidence of any higher floors.

None of the 12 listings reference the total number of units (e.g., '109-unit building' or similar). Without explicit unit-count information, the building’s total unit count cannot be reliably determined.

Listings mention tenants, rental history, and investment potential but provide no numeric or descriptive owner-occupancy percentage. Current value of 15% is kept due to lack of contrary evidence.

Remarks clearly describe the property as a three-story walk-up with no elevators. This directly confirms the current value of 0 elevators for the building.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Multiple remarks explicitly mention 'window AC' and never central air conditioning, and the building is a small three-story walk-up where central A/C would normally be highlighted if present. MLS data confirms no association_fee_includes entries for central A/C, so it is not included in the fees.

Across 12 listings, agents consistently list included utilities (water, sewer, gas, electricity, hot water, garbage) but never mention cable TV or 'cable included.' MLS data also shows CABTV unchecked for all units, indicating cable service is not part of the maintenance fee.

One listing clearly notes that the maintenance fee includes 'common area maintenance,' and several others discuss shared amenities like pool, gated entry, and resident manager. MLS data with OTCOEX selected in most listings supports that common area expenses, including common-area utilities, are covered by the fees.

All remarks refer to leasehold terms ('Lease expires 2051') and never to co-op ownership or co-op tax structures. MLS data does not indicate co-op taxes are included, so cooperative taxes are not part of the maintenance fees.

Multiple listings state 'Maintenance fee includes ... electricity' or 'MF includes electric,' and several note that 'ALL utilities are included in the maintenance fee.' Every MLS entry marks electricity as included, providing strong building-wide evidence that electricity is covered by the maintenance fee.

Listings repeatedly highlight gas stoves and note that maintenance fees include gas ('Maintenance fee includes water, sewer, gas', 'MF includes electric, gas, water/sewer & hot water'). With GAS selected in all MLS entries, it's clear gas is included in the building's maintenance charges.

A key listing explicitly confirms that hot water is part of the maintenance fee ('MF includes ... hot water'), and MLS data shows HOTWAT checked in most units. The absence of unit-level water heaters in inclusions and the 'ALL utilities' language in multiple remarks support that hot water is centrally supplied and included in the fees.

Agents repeatedly list included items such as electricity, water, sewer, gas, hot water, and garbage, but never reference internet service, Wi-Fi, or cable/internet bundles. Combined with MLS showing no internet-included flag, this indicates internet is not part of the maintenance fee.

Remarks focus on proximity to Waikiki Beach, pool, and urban amenities, with no mention of boat slips, docks, or marina access. MLS data confirms no marina-related fees are included, so marina costs are not part of the maintenance fee.

Several listings directly mention sewer being included in the maintenance fee, often paired with water and gas. With SEWER checked on all MLS records, there is strong evidence that sewer charges are included building-wide in the maintenance fees.

Listings consistently list water among the included utilities, sometimes paired as 'water/sewer' in the maintenance fee. Combined with WATER being selected in every MLS record, this shows that water service is included in the building's maintenance fees.

None of the listings mention BBQ grills or a barbecue area, despite describing the pool, covered seating, and other common elements. Given the consistent omission in remarks and MLS data, the building is very unlikely to offer a dedicated BBQ facility.

No listings out of 12 reference any form of bicycle storage amenity (bike room, racks, or secured bike area), and the MLS bike storage checkbox is never selected. The few mentions of 'bike' refer only to getting around the neighborhood, not building features, so it is very likely that this building does not provide dedicated bike storage.

Although the building is in Waikiki, no listing claims direct marina, dock, or boat slip access. References to a 'reading nook beside the water' clearly relate to the pool area, so it is highly unlikely that there is any boat dock amenity.

The building already has limited parking (wait-list for stalls) and no agent mentions any car wash area. This strongly suggests there is no dedicated car wash amenity.

Listings consistently describe a simple walk-up with a pool, laundry, and resident manager but never a clubhouse or community center. The absence from both MLS and remarks strongly indicates there is no clubhouse amenity.

The building is described as having a resident or on-site manager, but there is no indication of concierge or front-desk services. In Waikiki, concierge service is typically highlighted when present, so its absence from all 12 remarks is meaningful. Current MLS amenities also do not show concierge.

Although the building is pet-relevant by location, none of the remarks describe a dedicated dog park or pet area. Combined with 0/12 MLS flags, this indicates there is no on-site dog park.

Security and management are attributed to a resident/on-site manager rather than a staffed door or lobby attendant. For a small three-story walk-up, a doorman would be unusual and a key selling point, yet it is never advertised. This strongly indicates there is no doorman service.

Across 12 listings, there is no mention of an exercise room, gym, or fitness center. Agents consistently focus on the pool, laundry, secure/gated entry, and resident manager, which strongly suggests there is no dedicated exercise facility in this small three-story walk-up.

All 12 listings describe the property as a modest, secure walk-up rather than a full-service luxury high-rise. The complete lack of any reference to limo or car service indicates such a service is not offered.

Across all 12 listings, there is no mention of any meeting room, conference room, or hospitality room. Given how small the building is and the lack of MLS flags, it is very likely there is no dedicated meeting room.

At least two listings note a 'Beautiful pool on property with covered patio' and a 'Nice pool on property with a covered patio area.' These phrases, repeated by different agents, strongly support that the building offers a common patio/deck area by the pool.

While the area offers walkability and access to nearby outdoor spaces, no listing claims an on-site jogging or walking path. This indicates there is no dedicated jogging path amenity within the building complex.

Listings do not reference any children's playground or play structure, instead focusing on the pool and proximity to the beach and shopping. This pattern makes it very unlikely that the building has a playground amenity.

None of the 12+ remarks reference a private or enclosed yard; the only 'back yard' mention is clearly figurative ('all of Waikiki Beach is your "back yard"'). Given the urban setting and lack of any yard-related marketing, the building very likely does not offer private yard space.

Agents never mention a putting green despite detailing other amenities such as the pool and seating areas. The complete absence in both MLS and remarks makes it highly probable that no putting green exists on site.

While there is a pool with some covered seating and a small reading spot, no listing calls this a recreation area or amenity deck. With 0/12 MLS flags and no explicit language, it is unlikely the building has a defined recreation area amenity as understood in the MLS sense.

Agents do not reference any recreation room, rec room, game room, or multi-purpose room in any of the 12 remarks. Instead, they emphasize outdoor pool and seating areas, indicating there is no separate indoor recreation room.

Agents emphasize the building's proximity to Waikiki restaurants and the International Marketplace rather than any on-site dining. With 0/12 MLS checks and no explicit mention, it is very likely there is no restaurant in the building.

The building is described as a three-story walk-up with amenities centered around the ground-level pool area. No agent mentions any rooftop deck or rooftop amenities, which strongly suggests no shared rooftop feature exists.

The amenity set described is limited to pool, laundry, secure/gated entry, and resident manager. The absence of any mention of a sauna or steam room across all listings makes it very likely there is no sauna on site.

Across 12 listings for this building, no remarks reference storage units, storage lockers, or additional building storage, despite multiple agents carefully describing amenities like pool, community laundry, and secured entry. Only in-unit or furniture-related storage (e.g., 'additional storage underneath' a bed, 'large closet') is mentioned. Given that only 3/12 MLS entries check a generic storage amenity and remarks never highlight it, this building is very likely not offering dedicated storage units or lockers.

The public remarks describe amenities such as a pool, laundry facilities, secured/gated entry, security cameras, resident/on-site manager, and seating/reading areas, but do not mention any surfboard or board storage. Based on this absence, it is likely the building does not offer dedicated surfboard storage, though this cannot be ruled out with complete certainty.

No listing describes any tennis court or tennis facility, and the building is repeatedly characterized as a small three-story walk-up with a pool. This makes it highly likely that there are no tennis courts on site.

The property is repeatedly described as a three-story walk-up, a building type that often lacks trash chutes. With no MLS indication and no mention in remarks, it is very likely that there is no trash chute system.

Multiple listings discuss parking as 'Parking wait list available, rental stalls available nearby' with no reference to valet or valet parking. This consistent self-park description across many agents strongly indicates there is no valet service at the building.

Several agents describe the property as having a 'gated entry', and emphasize it as a key part of the building’s security. This implies a physical gate/fence around the property rather than just an unlocked doorway. MLS data with at least one GATED/WALFEN flag reinforces this interpretation.

Agents call out a 'swimming pool', 'beautiful pool', and 'nice pool' but never a hot tub, whirlpool, or spa. Given this consistent wording and MLS data, the property almost certainly lacks a whirlpool amenity.

The building clearly has a swimming pool. All 12 listings reference it in remarks with phrases like 'Swimming pool, and community laundry', 'refreshing swimming pool', and 'Nice pool on property with a covered patio area', and 12/12 have pool-related amenities checked in the MLS. This consistent, multi-agent evidence strongly confirms a common-area pool for the building.

There is no indication that the pool is heated. Across 12 listings, agents describe a 'pool' or 'swimming pool' but never mention it being heated, and 0/12 have any heated-pool flags set in the MLS. This consistent absence suggests the building’s pool is standard, not heated.

I searched all remarks for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', or 'saline pool' and only found generic references to a pool or swimming pool. With no explicit indication it is salt water, it is most likely a standard (non-salt) pool, but this is not definitively confirmed by the remarks.

Across 12 listings, none reference in-unit washers or dryers, and MLS inclusions never list a washer/dryer. Multiple remarks instead emphasize shared options like 'community laundry', 'on-site laundry facilities', and 'coin-operated laundry', indicating laundry is building-based rather than inside units. Given the consistent absence of any in-unit mentions, it's very likely no units offer dedicated in-unit laundry.

Most listings explicitly describe shared laundry, with phrases like 'Swimming pool, and community laundry', 'on-site laundry facilities', 'On-site coin-operated laundry', and 'There’s a coin-operated laundry room on-site'. The amenity is also checked in the MLS for the majority of units, and references come from multiple different listings/agents, so the presence of community laundry in the building is well-established.

Multiple listings clearly describe the laundry as coin-operated, indicating residents must pay to use it. This is strong, direct evidence that the community laundry is paid.

I searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor' or 'laundry room on every floor' but found only general references to on-site/community laundry. This suggests shared laundry facilities exist but not specifically on every floor.

Multiple listings state there is a "parking wait list" and that residents can "rent a stall from the resident manager," showing the building maintains a limited number of on-site parking stalls. MLS unit-level data shows NONE for most units, consistent with stalls being optional/rented rather than deeded but still available in the building.

One detailed listing notes that "there is a waiting list to rent a stall from the resident manager (available for long-term residents or owners)," which strongly suggests individually controlled, reserved stalls. This pattern, repeated across several listings referencing a parking waitlist, supports that parking is assigned while rented.

Across all remarks, parking is only referred to generically as a "stall," with no references to covered or garage parking even when describing the parking waitlist. Given that no MLS records flag covered or garage options, it is very likely all on-site stalls are uncovered.

Multiple remarks clarify that parking is separately rented and not included with the units, which strongly suggests there is no deeded/owned parking. No descriptions mention deeded, owned, or included parking stalls.

None of the marketing materials or MLS features reference EV charging stations, Tesla chargers, or similar amenities. For a small vintage Waikiki walk-up, the absence of any mention across many listings is strong evidence that EV charging is not available.

There is clear evidence that parking, when available, is paid/rented, but no listing specifies the monthly parking fee or exact cost. Searched for explicit amounts or phrases like 'parking fee $X per month' and found none, so the fee amount remains unknown.

Listings emphasize that parking is scarce and must be obtained via a waitlist, with some residents using nearby rental stalls. This focus on limited resident parking and the complete absence of "guest" or "visitor" parking references strongly indicates there is no dedicated guest parking.

The building is described as having gated/secured entry and security cameras, but parking is never described as gated or access-controlled, even when the parking waitlist is discussed. This suggests SECENT in MLS is being used for building access only, not secured parking entry.

Agents describe how parking is obtained (waitlist, rental from resident manager, nearby rental stalls) but never mention tandem stalls or similar configurations. Given this consistent silence and the MLS data, it is very likely there is no tandem parking at this building.

The building is portrayed as a modest three-story walk-up with a resident manager and basic amenities, not a full-service property. The lack of any reference to valet service across many listings makes it virtually certain that valet parking is not offered.

Public remarks consistently describe a parking waitlist system administered by the resident manager. Repeated mentions across several listings make the existence of a parking waitlist highly certain.

The building is repeatedly described as a three-story walk-up, with one agent explicitly clarifying 'no elevators'. With no elevators present at all, keyed or fob-access elevator security cannot exist in this building. MLS amenity data is consistent with this.

The remarks describe the building as secure, with gated/secured entry and security cameras, but never mention card or fob-based access. I looked specifically for terms like key card, fob, card reader, electronic access, and keycard entry and found none, so card access is presumed not present.

Multiple agents emphasize security via gated/secured entry and an on-site/resident manager, but none mention a security guard or 24/7 security service. Given that this is a small three-story walk-up, a dedicated guard would be a major selling point and is almost certainly absent. Current MLS data (0/12 for SECGUA) supports that there is no guard service.

Listings note security features such as secure/gated entry, security cameras, and a resident manager, but do not reference any patrol or roving security service. I searched for terms like security patrol, roving security, and patrol service and found no evidence of a patrol program.

Several remarks describe the building as having 'gated entry' and 'security cameras' along with an on-site manager. These explicit mentions across multiple listings provide strong, direct evidence of a video surveillance system. Buyers can reasonably expect security cameras in common areas.

Across 12 listings, no remarks reference central air, HVAC, or forced air, and MLS checkbox data never indicates central AC. Instead, agents consistently highlight individual window A/C units in this three-story walk-up, so the building is very unlikely to have central air conditioning.

None of the 12 listings mention split, mini-split, or ductless AC, and MLS data never indicates split systems. Agents consistently describe window A/C units instead, so it is very likely the building does not offer split AC in its units.

Window AC is clearly present: 12/12 listings have ACWIUN checked, and at least 5 remarks explicitly say 'window A/C' or 'window AC unit.' Other listings that list 'refrigerator and AC' appear to follow the same pattern, indicating window units are common throughout the building.

MLS checkbox data shows 7 of 12 listings marking concrete construction, with no listings indicating wood or steel framing. Remarks describe a three-story walk-up but do not specify materials, so the majority MLS consensus is treated as reliable.

A small minority of listings mark double wall, but most describe concrete/masonry construction and none mark wood framing. The double-wall checkboxes are likely agent inconsistency, so the building is treated as not double wall.

A minority (2 of 12) of listings explicitly mark hollow tile construction, and none explicitly conflict with that. Given the age/type of the building and these MLS selections, hollow tile is plausible but not as strongly supported as concrete/masonry.

Most listings (7 of 12) identify masonry/stucco construction, with no conflicting materials checked. Remarks do not mention materials, so the strong MLS consensus is relied on.

None of the listings identify steel frame construction and the building is a low-rise 3-story walk-up, which is rarely steel-framed in this market. The data strongly supports that it is not steel frame.

Slab construction is checked in just 1 listing, versus much stronger patterns for above-ground, concrete, and masonry/stucco. With no remarks supporting slab and the MLS data largely omitting it, it is likely not a defining construction type for this building.

No analysis available

No listing checks wood frame construction, while most indicate concrete and masonry/stucco. For a mid-century Waikiki 3-story walk-up, this strongly suggests it is not a wood-frame building.

Half of the listings explicitly mark above-ground construction and none indicate an alternative such as full slab-only classification in a consistent way. This suggests the building is generally regarded in MLS as above ground.

No agents mark brick construction and no remarks reference brick or brick-and-mortar features. Given local building norms and the data, it is very likely not a brick building.

No agents mark single wall construction and the selected materials point to a more substantial concrete/masonry structure. This strongly indicates the building is not single wall.

Listings emphasize that only 30-day minimum rentals are allowed and that daily or sub-30-day rentals are prohibited by zoning. Based on the provided rules, a 30-day minimum means short-term rentals are not allowed in this building.

All remarks focus on standard 30-day rentals and long-term tenants with no reference to a hotel rental pool or hotel management operations. Since short-term rentals are not allowed, participation in a hotel pool is effectively ruled out.

There is no evidence of a building-wide mandatory hotel or rental pool requirement in any listing. Combined with the absence of any hotel pool program, mandatory participation can be confidently ruled out.

At least 9 of 12 listings explicitly describe the units as leasehold, with lease terms and lease rent renegotiations noted, and none advertise any unit as fee simple. This consistent, building-wide leasehold language strongly indicates there are no fee simple units in this CPR.

At least 9 of 12 listings explicitly identify the building/units as leasehold, with phrases like 'leasehold property' and 'leasehold building'. Remarks note lease rent of $182.93 until 11/30/2031, renegotiations in 2031 and 2041, and lease expiration on 11/30/2051 or 'leasehold ends in 2051'.

Across numerous listings for this building, the ground lease end date is consistently stated as 2051, sometimes with the exact date of November 30, 2051. With repeated, consistent references, the lease expiry year is determined to be 2051.

All listings emphasize leasehold terms, rental rules, and amenities but never reference VA approval or VA financing. Given this consistent omission across many remarks, the building is likely not VA-approved.

Remarks discuss what the maintenance fee includes (water, sewer, gas, electricity, etc.) but do not reference HOA-provided full or walls-in insurance coverage. Without explicit mention, full building insurance cannot be confirmed.

Across 12 listings, agents highlight amenities like pool, security cameras, gated/secured entry, and laundry, but never mention sprinklers. Combined with all MLS amenity data omitting FIRSPR and the building’s age and three-story walk-up design, this strongly suggests the building lacks a fire sprinkler system.

Listings describe security features like gated/secured entry and security cameras but do not mention any fire/life safety evaluation or certification. In the absence of explicit evidence, this is assumed not documented as passed.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

No listing remarks mention an ocean or water view, despite the building’s proximity to Waikiki Beach. MLS view data shows 0/12 units with OCEAN checked and 6/12 with view=NONE, suggesting the building does not offer marketable ocean-view units.

None of the 12 listings advertise a mountain view, and several explicitly state no view in the MLS checkbox. Agents highlight location and interior features but never refer to mountains, implying no significant mountain-view units in this 3-story walk-up.

Across all provided listings, Diamond Head is never mentioned as a view feature. Combined with 0/12 view_Diamond Head selections and multiple NONE view entries, this strongly indicates the building does not offer Diamond Head views.

Agents emphasize the ‘heart of Waikiki’ location and walkability but never promote any city or skyline view. The MLS data pattern (no CITY views checked, many NONE) suggests units generally lack notable city views worth marketing.

Although the building is a short walk to Waikiki Beach, no unit is advertised with a coastline or shoreline view. The lack of any coastline-view mentions or MLS flags suggests there are no coastline-view units here.

At least one MLS record explicitly marks a garden view, and the common-area descriptions (pool with covered patio, quiet reading spot by the water) suggest a landscaped interior environment. This supports that some units likely have garden/courtyard views, so buyers searching for garden-view options would be interested in this building.

The building is described as near golfing, but none of the 12 listings promote a golf course view. MLS data lacks any golf-course view selection, indicating there are no meaningful golf-course-view units here.

While some remarks mention proximity to the Ala Wai Canal and beaches, none mention views of a marina, harbor, or canal. With 0/12 marina-related view selections, it is very unlikely that any units offer a marina-type view.

Across all the provided remarks, there are no references to sunrise or morning views. With 0/12 MLS sunrise view selections, the building is not marketed as offering specific sunrise-view units.

None of the listings highlight sunset views or related features. The consistent absence of sunset mentions and zero MLS sunset view flags indicate that sunset views are not a notable feature of this building.

Cemetery views are never referenced in remarks or MLS view fields. Given the central Waikiki location and complete absence of such mentions, it is effectively certain that no units have a cemetery view.

Remarks focus on proximity to Waikiki Beach, shopping, and amenities, but do not state that fireworks can be viewed from the building. In the absence of any such description, a fireworks view is unlikely.

No analysis available

Across more than a dozen remarks emphasizing rental potential and amenities, there are zero references to pets, dogs, or cats, despite agents typically highlighting pet-friendliness when present. This absence suggests pets are likely not allowed or are heavily restricted, though this is not explicitly confirmed in the text.

At least 8 of 12 listings reference a resident or on-site manager (e.g., 'Resident manager lives on site', 'friendly on-site manager', 'Resident Manager on site'). The consistency of this language across multiple agents and MLS RESMAN checkboxes confirms that the building has a resident manager.

Listings explicitly state '30 Day Rental allowed' and 'Daily rentals or less than 30 days not allowed per zoning,' which conflicts with hotel-style nightly use typical of condotels. With no mention of a hotel program or front desk and CONDOT not used in MLS data, the building is very likely not operated as a condotel.

The building is repeatedly referred to as a leasehold property with unit-level leases (e.g., 'Leasehold ends in 2051', 'lease rent $182.93'), consistent with a condominium structure rather than a cooperative. The complete absence of cooperative terminology across all listings supports that it is not a co-op.