Kohina at Hoopili
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kohina at Hoopili
Building Overview
Kohina at Hoopili in Ewa — built 2019; concrete/steel/wood construction with pool and BBQ amenities.
About Kohina at Hoopili
Kohina at Hoopili is a residential building located in the Ewa neighborhood, completed in 2019. According to available records, the building is constructed with concrete, steel frame, and wood frame elements and is served by a single elevator. Unit size and count are not provided in the MLS data supplied.
Key amenities noted in the MLS data include a pool, a BBQ area, and a resident manager. Units are equipped with split air conditioning and some residences offer mountain and sunset views.
Parking is available with covered, assigned stalls and guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the provided data. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS information. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, rules, and any applicable fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit occupancy statistics like '80% owner occupied,' 'majority owner occupied,' or similar building-level language. No such statistic appears in the remarks, and references to owner-occupant requirements are not the same thing. Because there is no reliable percentage in the public remarks, this remains unknown.
Public remarks explicitly confirm elevator access in the building. No remarks indicate multiple elevators, so the current value of 1 remains supported. This aligns with the building being a small condo/townhome-style development rather than a high-rise.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is very strong that maintenance fees include common-area electricity/common-area maintenance. Across many listings, remarks mention the HOA covering "maintenance of common areas" and the building/community repeatedly references shared amenities, matching the MLS OTCOEX pattern in 19/20 listings. This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste note.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building does not appear to include hot water in maintenance fees. MLS history is highly consistent at 0/20 HOTWAT inclusions and 19/20 WTRHTR entries, and the public remarks contain no explicit hot-water-included language. The evidence strongly supports a false value here.
No analysis available
No analysis available
7 of 20 MLS listings currently list SEWER in association_fee_includes, suggesting some units may have sewer included. However, at least one public remark explicitly states 'the unit's water and sewer are separately billed and does not include with the maintenance fee,' indicating inconsistency across listings/agents. Because MLS checkbox presence suggests some units list sewer as included but remarks contradict for at least one unit, confidence is moderate that sewer is offered for some units.
6 of 20 MLS listings currently list WATER in association_fee_includes, indicating some listings/agents checked water as included. At least one public remark clearly states 'the unit's water and sewer are separately billed,' which conflicts with some MLS checkboxes. Given mixed evidence (MLS checkboxes vs agent remarks), there is moderate confidence that some units may list water included, but the data appears inconsistent and may reflect agent copy/paste errors.
Strong, repeated evidence supports BBQ/grilling amenities in the building/community. Multiple listings explicitly reference a “BBQ area,” “BBQs,” or “BBQ areas,” and the current remarks are consistent across many agents rather than a one-off mention. This looks like a stable shared amenity, not a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is moderate but consistent evidence for clubhouse/community-center type amenities. Several listings reference the SoHo Community Center, and one explicitly says “clubhouse, and BBQ area,” while others describe a recreation/community center used for gatherings. The wording varies, but it consistently points to a shared clubhouse/community center amenity.
No analysis available
Evidence for a dog park/pet area is overwhelming. Dozens of remarks explicitly say "dog park," including detailed phrasing like "fully gated dog park," "dog park right outside your back door," and "bark & ride park." This is a very consistent shared community amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence that Kohina at Ho‘opili offers patio/deck-style outdoor spaces. At least many listings mention a lanai, covered lanai, or balcony, suggesting this is a common amenity across units rather than a copy-paste anomaly. The historical MLS checkbox data and the remarks align closely, so confidence is very high.
There is strong evidence the building/community offers walking or jogging path access. Listings mention "walking paths," a "jogging path," "running path," and even "bike paths," showing repeated confirmation of path-based recreation amenities. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings, not a one-off claim.
No analysis available
Multiple ground-floor listings describe a small/private yard or private backyard area attached to units, and MLS amenities show PRIYAR in 3/20 entries.
No analysis available
There is strong evidence that the community includes a recreation area. Remarks mention "recreation area," "recreation spaces," and "recreation center" across multiple listings, often in the context of Ho'opili/SoHo amenities. This appears consistently across different agents, not just a single copied description.
Strong building-level evidence for a recreation room/rec room. Across many listings, agents reference a "rec room," "recreation center," and "multi-use recreation rooms," often alongside pool and clubhouse amenities. The consistency across multiple remarks supports that this is a real shared feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings in Kohina at Ho‘opili advertise extra storage, including phrases like “extra large storage closet,” “50-square-foot lanai boasting an ample storage closet,” and “ample closet and storage spaces within the home.” Combined with MLS data where a subset of listings are checked for STORAG/ADDLVSTORAG, this suggests that certain units in the building come with dedicated storage closets, so buyers searching for buildings with additional storage should consider this property.
I searched for surfboard-storage-related phrases such as surf storage, board storage, or bike and surfboard storage. The remarks do not mention any dedicated surfboard storage facilities.
There is clear but somewhat less frequent evidence for tennis courts than for other amenities. Several listings explicitly refer to “tennis courts” or “learning tennis,” often alongside basketball/pickleball, which supports that the building/community offers tennis facilities.
No public remarks reference a 'trash chute', 'garbage chute', or 'refuse chute' across the listings. With TRACHU checked in only 3 of 20 MLS entries and no corroborating remarks (and no prior high-confidence history), the available evidence indicates the building does not advertise a trash chute amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported across the listings: many remarks explicitly mention a "community pool," "swimming pool," or "SoHo Community Center" pool. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and unit types, and it aligns with the historical MLS data showing pool amenities in 19/20 listings.
There is no corroborating remark evidence that the community pool is heated: 0 of the reviewed public remarks mention "heated pool" or similar language, and only 1 of 20 MLS amenity flags lists a heated pool. Given the lack of explicit mentions across multiple agents and listings, the heated attribute is not supported by the remarks and is therefore marked false (low occurrence in MLS amenity flags and no confirming remarks).
I searched for explicit salt-water pool wording such as saltwater pool, salt pool, or saline pool. The remarks repeatedly mention a community pool, but none specify that it is a salt-water pool.
In-unit laundry is very strongly supported across the listing set. I found explicit confirmation in many current remarks—well over a dozen mentions—including phrases such as 'in-unit washer and dryer,' 'full-size washer & dryer,' 'stacked washer/dryer,' and 'dedicated laundry area.' The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and appears to be a real building feature, not just copy-paste MLS noise.
No analysis available
I looked for any indication that shared laundry requires payment, such as coin-operated machines, card access, or laundry fees. The listings only reference private in-unit laundry, so there is no evidence of paid community laundry.
I searched the public remarks for language like "laundry on every floor," "floor-by-floor laundry," or shared laundry access on each level. The remarks only mention in-unit washer/dryer, stacked washer/dryer, or laundry areas inside individual units, which does not indicate community laundry on every floor.
Parking is clearly a building feature across the remarks: many listings mention "1-car garage," "2 assigned parking stalls," "driveway parking," and "additional assigned stalls." The evidence is consistent across numerous agents and listing types, so this appears to be a reliable building-level feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Assigned parking is strongly supported. Multiple listings describe 2 assigned stalls, assigned tandem spaces, or a mix of garage plus assigned stalls, suggesting this is a real and recurring building feature rather than a checkbox artifact.
Covered parking is well supported by the remarks, including phrases like "enclosed one-car garage," "attached garage," "1 car garage," and "2-car garage." Multiple listings mention garages directly, confirming that covered parking is available in the building for at least some units.
I reviewed the listings for wording such as deeded parking, owned stall, parking included in deed, or parking stall included. The remarks consistently indicate assigned or garage/driveway spaces rather than deeded ownership, so deeded parking is not supported by the text.
No analysis available
I searched for any parking-specific fee language, including monthly parking charge, parking rent, or added cost for stalls. The remarks only describe the number and type of parking spaces, so no parking fee can be extracted from the public text.
Guest parking is explicitly mentioned in multiple listings, including "nearby guest parking," "available guest parking stalls," and "plenty of guests and street parking." The recurring references across different listings make this a strong building/community feature.
No analysis available
Tandem parking is directly confirmed by multiple remarks, with phrases such as "tandem driveway space," "tandem parking behind the garage," and "1 open tandem parking spot." While not every unit has it, the feature is clearly present in the building for some listings.
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist or waiting list language and found none. The remarks consistently describe assigned parking, garages, and guest stalls, which argues against a waitlist system.
No analysis available
The public remarks repeatedly describe card/fob-based or electronic secured entry. Examples include 'secure key fob entrance to the lobby,' 'secured building access,' and 'keyless entry,' which strongly support card/fob access security.
Only 1/20 MLS entries check SECGUA, while extensive remarks focus on secured entry (key fob, smart locks, security systems) but never mention on-site security guards or 24/7 staffed security, which would normally be advertised.
I looked for public remarks indicating patrol service or a patrolled building. The listings mention secured entry, key fob access, and security systems, but not an actual security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is very strongly supported across the building. Dozens of listings explicitly mention it, often in multiple rooms or throughout the unit, with phrases such as "split A/C," "split AC units in every room," and "split system ac throughout." This appears consistent across many agents and listings, not just a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
6 of 20 current MLS listings include the CONCRE construction material checkbox. Public remarks do not explicitly state 'concrete construction' or similar phrases; most agent remarks focus on finishes, amenities, and split AC. Because multiple listings still mark CONCRE but remarks are silent, the evidence is implied (not explicit) and moderately supportive.
Double-wall construction appears to be a real building feature. The MLS data is strong (14 of 20 listings checked DOUWAL), and several remarks reinforce the idea with language like "does not share walls with neighbors" and "solid, quality construction blocks out outside noises."
No analysis available
No listings in the provided remarks explicitly describe the building as masonry or stucco construction. Only 5 of 20 current MLS records include MASSTU in construction materials, which is too inconsistent to support the feature for the building with high confidence. The remarks are largely repetitive community/amenity copy and do not add corroborating construction details.
Steel-frame construction is not confirmed by the public remarks. Although the MLS shows STEFRA in 7 of 20 listings, none of the remarks mention "steel frame" or similar wording, which suggests the checkbox may be unreliable here.
4 of 20 current MLS listings include the SLAB checkbox; however, public remarks contain no explicit phrases like 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation.' Given the limited but present MLS checkbox usage, slab foundation is possible for some units but the evidence is implied and not confirmed in agent remarks.
No analysis available
Wood-frame construction is not supported by the current public remarks. Despite some historical MLS checkbox activity (6 of 20), there are no agent remarks using phrases like "wood frame" or "wood frame construction," so this appears to be checkbox noise rather than confirmed building-level evidence.
Above-ground construction remains supported by the MLS and remarks. Even though only 8 of 20 current listings check ABOGRO, the prior confidence was high and the listings consistently describe multi-level townhomes/condos rather than anything that would contradict above-ground construction. There is no strong evidence of a change.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, and other permissive STR wording, but found none. The remarks instead point to owner-occupant/DPP-restricted use, so STR is not supported.
I looked for hotel rental pool, branded hotel program, or hotel-managed wording and found nothing. Since the public remarks do not support STR, hotel pool participation is also false.
I searched for mandatory hotel pool, required participation, cannot opt out, or must rent language and found none. The remarks do not indicate any compulsory rental-pool structure.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms like leasehold, ground lease, lease expires, lease ends, and renewal language, but found no specific lease-expiration year. Because no public remarks explicitly state a lease term or expiry, the value remains unknown.
Public remarks consistently advertise VA approval and assumable VA financing across many listings. This is strong, repeated evidence from the listing text itself.
I searched for building-level insurance statements in the public remarks, including fully insured and walls-in coverage language. Nothing in the listings explicitly states that the building is fully insured by the HOA. The available remarks only describe limited HOA-covered items, so this is not supported.
Fire sprinklers are strongly supported across the building’s listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention them, including "fire sprinklered complex," "ceiling fire sprinklers," and "Fire Sprinklers," which aligns with the current MLS amenities showing FIRSPR in most listings. This appears to be a consistently present building feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
I searched the remarks for fire/life safety evaluation language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, and passed fire inspection. The only related references were to fire sprinklers, which indicate a safety feature but not an inspection or certification pass. Based on the public remarks, this feature is not confirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are clearly available in this building. Across many listings, agents explicitly mention them in different ways, including "beautiful mountain views," "tranquil mountain views," "view of the Ko'olau mountains," and "mountain/sunset views." The evidence is strong and repeated across multiple listings, suggesting this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple public remarks across different listings explicitly advertise sunset or evening views — quotes include "sunset views from both bedrooms and the lanai", "balcony to enjoy golden sunsets", and "covered Balcony w/ mountain/sunset views". At least four separate listings mention sunsets and the MLS view_descriptions include SUNSET on several units (5 of 20), indicating the building does offer sunset-view units across multiple listings rather than a single isolated listing.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit fireworks-view language such as seeing fireworks from a lanai or unit. The remarks mention mountain, city, ocean, and sunset views, but nothing about fireworks views from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is suggested by the MLS amenity data rather than the remarks. About 11 of 20 current listings include RESMAN, but none of the public remarks explicitly say "resident manager," "on-site manager," or similar. Confidence is moderate because the checkbox evidence is present, but it may still reflect inconsistent agent input.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.