Kohina at Hoopili
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Kohina at Hoopili
Building Overview
Kohina at Hoopili in Ewa — built 2019; concrete/steel/wood construction with pool and BBQ amenities.
About Kohina at Hoopili
Kohina at Hoopili is a residential building located in the Ewa neighborhood, completed in 2019. According to available records, the building is constructed with concrete, steel frame, and wood frame elements and is served by a single elevator. Unit size and count are not provided in the MLS data supplied.
Key amenities noted in the MLS data include a pool, a BBQ area, and a resident manager. Units are equipped with split air conditioning and some residences offer mountain and sunset views.
Parking is available with covered, assigned stalls and guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the provided data. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS information. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, rules, and any applicable fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for an owner-occupancy percentage and phrases such as majority owner occupied or highly owner occupied. The owner-occupant purchase requirement does not establish the building-wide percentage, so the value remains unknown.
The remarks confirm elevator access in the building, including a secured elevator. No listing explicitly mentions multiple elevators or provides a number greater than one, so the current value of 1 is retained with low confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly supports that maintenance fees include common-area electricity/common-area costs. The current listing set shows 17/20 with OTCOEX, and the remarks include explicit HOA coverage of common-area maintenance, consistent with a shared-building expense being included. This looks like a stable building-level feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The evidence strongly indicates maintenance fees do not include hot water. Across the listing set, 0/20 MLS records include HOTWAT while 18/20 list WTRHTR, and the public remarks contain no explicit hot-water-included language. This pattern is consistent across many listings and appears to reflect the actual building setup rather than inconsistent agent input.
No analysis available
No analysis available
7 of 20 MLS listings currently list SEWER in association_fee_includes, suggesting some units may have sewer included. However, at least one public remark explicitly states 'the unit's water and sewer are separately billed and does not include with the maintenance fee,' indicating inconsistency across listings/agents. Because MLS checkbox presence suggests some units list sewer as included but remarks contradict for at least one unit, confidence is moderate that sewer is offered for some units.
6 of 20 MLS listings currently list WATER in association_fee_includes, indicating some listings/agents checked water as included. At least one public remark clearly states 'the unit's water and sewer are separately billed,' which conflicts with some MLS checkboxes. Given mixed evidence (MLS checkboxes vs agent remarks), there is moderate confidence that some units may list water included, but the data appears inconsistent and may reflect agent copy/paste errors.
BBQ is strongly supported across the listing set. Multiple remarks explicitly reference a "BBQ area," "BBQ areas," and a "pool with BBQs," which is consistent with the MLS amenities data and appears in several listings from different agents rather than a one-off copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I found no evidence of a car wash amenity in the public remarks. The listings focus on parking, garages, and community amenities, but not any vehicle wash station or auto wash area.
Clubhouse/community-center style amenities are supported through repeated mentions of the SoHo Community Center and similar phrasing like "community center" and "clubhouse." The evidence is consistent enough to treat this as a shared building/community amenity.
No analysis available
Dog park access is overwhelmingly supported. Dozens of remarks mention a "dog park," including more specific descriptions like a "fully gated dog park" and "bark & ride park," so this appears to be a real shared building/community amenity across the listing set.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Direct "meeting room" wording is scarce, but the remarks do reference related shared spaces such as "party rooms," "rec room," and "community room." Given the historical MLS support and repeated mentions of communal indoor spaces, this is reasonably supported, though not as strongly as BBQ or dog park.
Patio/deck-style outdoor space is strongly supported for Kohina at Ho‘opili. Across the provided remarks, many listings explicitly mention a "covered lanai," "private lanai," "covered balcony," or "private covered lanai," and the current MLS data shows 13/20 listings marked with PATDEC/COVPAT. The repeated mentions across multiple agents confirm this is a real building-level feature available to buyers.
Walking/jogging path access is well supported by both historical data and current remarks. Listings mention "walking paths," a "jogging path," "bike paths," and a "running path," indicating a shared neighborhood amenity. The feature appears repeatedly across multiple agents and listing versions, so confidence is high.
No analysis available
Multiple ground-floor listings describe a small/private yard or private backyard area attached to units, and MLS amenities show PRIYAR in 3/20 entries.
No analysis available
Recreation area access is well supported by both MLS and public remarks. Listings mention "recreation area," "rec center," "recreation center," and "recreational spaces," indicating this is a genuine shared amenity rather than an MLS checkbox error.
Recreation room access is repeatedly referenced, including phrases like "rec room," "recreation room," and "multi-use recreation rooms." This appears to be a shared amenity and not just copy-paste noise.
The remarks consistently describe nearby dining, cafes, eateries, and shops, but not a building restaurant. Because the evidence points to surrounding retail/dining rather than an on-site amenity, this feature is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by multiple listing remarks across different agents, not just checkbox data. At least several listings explicitly mention storage-related features, including phrases like “extra large storage closet,” “ample storage throughout,” and “lots of additional storage,” which aligns with the historical MLS indicators for storage in amenities or unit features. The evidence appears consistent enough to include storage_unit for the building.
Although the remarks reference nearby beaches and surf spots, they do not identify any dedicated surfboard or board-storage facility in the building or community.
Tennis courts are mentioned in several remarks, including direct references to "tennis courts" and sports courts at Ho'opili. The evidence is less frequent than BBQ or dog park, but it appears across multiple listings and agents.
No public remarks reference a 'trash chute', 'garbage chute', or 'refuse chute' across the listings. With TRACHU checked in only 3 of 20 MLS entries and no corroborating remarks (and no prior high-confidence history), the available evidence indicates the building does not advertise a trash chute amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported. Across the provided remarks, well over 15 listings explicitly mention a "pool," "swimming pool," or "community pool/SoHo Community Center pool," often alongside other shared amenities like BBQ areas and recreation centers. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listing periods, so this appears to be a true building/community amenity rather than copied misinformation.
There is no corroborating remark evidence that the community pool is heated: 0 of the reviewed public remarks mention "heated pool" or similar language, and only 1 of 20 MLS amenity flags lists a heated pool. Given the lack of explicit mentions across multiple agents and listings, the heated attribute is not supported by the remarks and is therefore marked false (low occurrence in MLS amenity flags and no confirming remarks).
A community pool is clearly described, but its water type is not specified. No public remark confirms that the pool is salt water.
In-unit laundry is strongly and consistently supported across the listings. Well over a dozen remarks explicitly mention washer/dryer in-unit or a dedicated laundry area, including terms like "full-size washer & dryer," "stacked washer/dryer," and "3rd floor laundry." The evidence appears broad across multiple agents and is not just a copy-paste checkbox issue.
No analysis available
The remarks repeatedly describe in-unit washers and dryers. Nothing indicates that community laundry exists or requires payment.
The remarks consistently describe dedicated in-unit laundry areas or in-unit washer/dryer appliances. No public remarks indicate community laundry facilities on every floor.
Parking is clearly a building feature. Across the remarks, dozens of listings mention phrases like “1 car garage,” “assigned parking stalls,” “driveway parking,” “tandem parking,” and “open assigned parking stalls,” with no meaningful contradiction. The evidence appears consistent across many agents and is not limited to a single unit type.
Assigned parking is strongly supported. The remarks repeatedly mention "2 assigned parking stalls," "two full-sized assigned parking stalls," and "2 assigned parking" across many listings, which aligns with the MLS checkbox pattern. This is high-confidence, building-level evidence rather than isolated wording.
Covered parking is very strongly supported across the listings. Many remarks explicitly reference “attached garage,” “enclosed garage,” “1-car garage,” and “2-car garage,” often alongside additional driveway or open stalls. This is repeated across numerous listings from different agents, making the evidence highly reliable.
The listings commonly include parking with the residences, including phrases such as "2 assigned parking stalls," "5 dedicated parking stalls," and garage or driveway parking. However, assigned or dedicated parking does not by itself establish that the parking is deeded.
No analysis available
The remarks discuss garages, assigned stalls, tandem spaces, driveways, guest parking, and maintenance fees. Searches for a separate parking fee or additional parking cost found no specific amount.
Guest parking is repeatedly confirmed in the remarks from many listings. Several listings explicitly say "guest parking" or describe stalls nearby for visitors, which strongly supports the feature at the building level. This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off or copied mischeck.
No analysis available
Tandem parking is directly supported by the remarks. Multiple listings describe "1 car garage plus a tandem driveway space," "tandem parking behind the garage," and "2 additional tandem parking," which is strong evidence that tandem parking is part of the building's parking options. The pattern appears across several agents and unit types.
No analysis available
The public remarks repeatedly describe parking arrangements without any waitlist-related language. This strongly supports that no building parking waitlist is indicated in the remarks.
No analysis available
Repeated explicit references confirm card or fob-based access control at the building. This is consistent with the previously high-confidence verification.
Only 1/20 MLS entries check SECGUA, while extensive remarks focus on secured entry (key fob, smart locks, security systems) but never mention on-site security guards or 24/7 staffed security, which would normally be advertised.
The remarks mention secured buildings, key fobs, alarms, cameras, smart-home security systems, and access control. None describe staffed or roving security patrol services.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is overwhelmingly supported across Kohina at Ho'opili. Dozens of current remarks explicitly mention it in varied phrasing, including "split AC units in every room," "split AC throughout," and "split system AC throughout," across many different listings and agents. This appears to be a consistent building feature, not a one-off or copy-paste error.
Across the provided listings, 0 listings explicitly mention window AC/window units/wall AC. Multiple agents consistently describe the units as having split AC instead, which strongly suggests this building does not offer window air conditioning as a standard feature. The lone MLS inclusion is not supported by the remarks and appears to be a copy-paste or checkbox error.
No public remarks explicitly state concrete construction, and across the listings reviewed the feature is never directly described. With only 6 of 20 current MLS listings checking CONCRE and no supporting narrative evidence, this appears unverified and likely inconsistent checkbox data rather than a confirmed building-wide feature.
Double-wall construction appears strongly supported across the listing remarks, including comments such as "does not share walls with neighbors" and "Well-built construction blocks out outside noises." While the phrase "double wall" is not used verbatim, the repeated remarks from multiple listings are consistent with the MLS history and suggest this is a real building characteristic rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No listings in the provided remarks explicitly describe the building as masonry or stucco construction. Only 5 of 20 current MLS records include MASSTU in construction materials, which is too inconsistent to support the feature for the building with high confidence. The remarks are largely repetitive community/amenity copy and do not add corroborating construction details.
Steel-frame construction is not explicitly called out in the public remarks, so there is no direct agent confirmation. However, the current MLS history shows STEFRA in 7 of 20 listings, which suggests the material may be part of the building record even though it may also reflect inconsistent checkbox use.
4 of 20 current MLS listings include the SLAB checkbox; however, public remarks contain no explicit phrases like 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation.' Given the limited but present MLS checkbox usage, slab foundation is possible for some units but the evidence is implied and not confirmed in agent remarks.
No analysis available
Wood-frame construction is not supported by the current public remarks. Despite some historical MLS checkbox activity (6 of 20), there are no agent remarks using phrases like "wood frame" or "wood frame construction," so this appears to be checkbox noise rather than confirmed building-level evidence.
Above-ground construction remains supported by the MLS history and by the way the units are described in remarks, with many listings referencing second-floor living areas, upper-level bedrooms, and multi-story layouts. Even though the exact phrase "above ground" is rarely stated, the repeated building descriptions align with the existing MLS feature coding.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks provide no evidence that short-term rentals are permitted. The explicit owner-occupant requirement is inconsistent with unrestricted STR use, so STR is treated as not allowed.
The referenced pools are neighborhood or community amenities rather than hotel rental pools. Because STR is not supported and no hotel rental program is mentioned, this feature is false.
The listings contain no evidence of any hotel rental pool, much less mandatory participation. Under the prerequisite rule, mandatory hotel-pool participation must also be false when STR is not allowed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searches for leasehold, ground lease, lease expiration, lease expiry, and renewal language found no applicable lease-expiry year. References to 2030 concern a buy-back restriction period and do not establish land-lease tenure or expiration.
The remarks repeatedly confirm VA approval and availability of VA financing or assumable VA loans. This is strong, consistent evidence that the building is VA loan approved.
I searched the remarks for explicit HOA-provided full or comprehensive building insurance and walls-in coverage. No supporting or denying statement was found, so this feature is treated as false with medium-low confidence based on the absence of a mention.
Fire sprinklers are very strongly supported for this building. At least two current listings explicitly say "fire sprinklered complex" or "Fire Sprinklers," and the MLS amenity data shows 16 of 20 listings checked. This appears to be consistent across listings rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
I searched for references to a passed fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE approval, fire safety certification, life-safety compliance, and passed fire inspection. The remarks only discuss fire sprinklers, which is not evidence that the FLSE passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are clearly available in Kohina at Ho'opili. Across numerous listings, agents explicitly describe 'mountain views,' 'mauka view,' 'Ko'olau mountains,' and 'mountain/sunset views,' which strongly confirms the feature. The evidence is widespread and consistent, so this building should be treated as offering mountain-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are well supported across multiple listings and agents, not just the MLS view field. At least 4 listings explicitly mention sunset views or sunset skies, with phrases like "sunset views from both bedrooms and the lanai," "enjoy sunset skies," and "balcony to enjoy golden sunsets." This is strong, repeated evidence that the building offers sunset-view units.
No analysis available
Remarks mention sunset, mountain, ocean, city, and Diamond Head views, but do not establish fireworks visibility from residences. References to nearby events or community activities do not qualify.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is suggested by the MLS amenity data, with 10 of 20 listings including RESMAN. However, there are no explicit public-remark mentions such as resident manager, live-in manager, or on-site manager, so this is only moderate-confidence support and may reflect copied MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.